Enter your Email Address


Useful Links

Know What The Insiders Are Doing!
Stock Trading Software

More Links




[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]




Oil Companies Still Making Piles of Money

Contrarian Profits (July 31st, 2009) Writes:

It’s not without some sort of satisfaction that many consumers react to the news that earning reports from oil companies have been dismal. After all, these companies have been making money off us hand over fist for quite some time.

Of course that doesn’t mean that they aren’t still making money.

Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM) reported that profit dropped 66% last quarter. Although it still made $3.95 billion, it’s just not making money hand over fist like last year.

In a eerily similar report, Royal Dutch Shell ADR (NYSE: RDS.A) said that it’s profit dropped 67% to $3.82 billion. ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) fared even worse, with profits plummeting 76% to $1.3 billion.

Hard times indeed in the petroleum industry.

This all comes on the heels of a volatile market in oil prices, regulators considering limits on oil speculation, and oil stockpiles fluctuating.

The real reason oil supplies have been moving so much

...

Oil Companies Still Making Piles of Money

Investment U (July 30th, 2009) Writes:

Oil Companies Still Making Piles of Money

by The Investment U Research Team

It’s not without some sort of satisfaction that many consumers react to the news that earning reports from oil companies have been dismal. After all, these companies have been making money off us hand over fist for quite some time.

Of course that doesn’t mean that they aren’t still making money.

Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM) reported that profit dropped 66% last quarter. Although it still made $3.95 billion, it’s just not making money hand over fist like last year.

In a eerily similar report, Royal Dutch Shell ADR (NYSE: RDS.A) said that it’s profit dropped 67% to $3.82 billion. ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) fared even worse, with profits plummeting 76% to $1.3 billion.

Hard times indeed in the petroleum industry.

...

Video-o-rama: Fresh wave of risk aversion

Prieur du Plessis (July 10th, 2009) Writes:

The first few days of the week have been characterized by a fresh wave of risk aversion as uncertainty over the global economic outlook took its toll on stock markets and investors favored safe-haven assets such as government bonds, the US dollar and Japanese yen. However, yesterday brought some relief for risky assets - now in corrective mode - and it remains to be seen whether the S&P 500 Index will close down for a fourth consecutive week as the US earnings season gets on the way.

The usual debate on the outlook for the economy and financial markets dominated the video channels over the past few days, but interesting snippets on the IMF’s improved forecast for the global economy, the viability of the Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP), the US dollar’s role as reserve currency, the prospects for the earnings-reporting season and President Obama’s visit to Russia were also

...
Tags for this Post:
ABC, Allen Sinai, Allen Sinia, America, Andrew Freris, Art Cashin, Bank, Barack Obama, Bianco Research;, bloomberg, BNP Paribas Wealth Management, Boone Pickens, BP Capital, Bryan Marsal;, ceo, Chairman, chairman and chief investment officer, Charlie Rose, chief economist, Chris Giles;, Cnbc, Cumblerland Advisors, Daniel Garrahan, David Kotok, David Rosenberg, Deputy Treasury Secretary, Dow 30, Dylan Ratigan, Federal Reserve System, Financial Times, foreign oil, Gbp, head of floor, head of floor operations, International Monetary Fund, invesment strategist, investment editor, investment postcards, Italy, Jeff Saut;, Jeffrey Saut, Jim Bianco;, Jim DeMint, John Authers, Lehman Brothers, Lehman Brothers Holdings, Market Commentary, Martha Raddatz, Martin Soong, Merrill Lynch, Michael Mandelbaum, Oil Speculation, Oliver Blanchard, Olivier Blanchard;, Peter Cook;, Peter Peterson;, president, Professor, Professor and Director, Raymond James, Roger Altman, Ron Paul, Russia, Russia, Sam Stovall, Senate, Sinai;, Sp 500, The Financial Times, the Johns Hopkins University;, The Macro Trader, UBS, United Kingdom, United States, Wilbur Ross;, WL Ross & Co, Yahoo

What happened to oil markets on Monday?

James Hamilton (September 23rd, 2008) Writes:

Here's how it was reported, for example, in the Wall Street Journal:

Reaction to the Wall Street bailout and frenzied last-minute trading in the oil market sent crude prices soaring by more than $16 a barrel, the biggest one-day jump ever.

The late-day spike, which shoved oil up 16% to $120.92 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, offered an illustration of Wall Street's hard-to-predict moves amid broad market turmoil.

And here's what really happened.

The most striking thing about yesterday's oil prices was the disparity between different futures contracts. The October contract, which expired yesterday, did indeed settle at $120.92, up more than $16. But oil for delivery in November closed at $109.27, an increase of only $6.62, and longer-forward contracts saw an even more modest increase. Unquestionably what was going on was a short squeeze, in which traders who had sold the October contract short were scrambling

...

More speculation about those oil speculators

James Hamilton (August 21st, 2008) Writes:

I normally leave it to folks like Dean Baker to beat up on the press. But I can't resist shining a bright light on today's story about oil speculators in the Washington Post, which has also been discussed by Mark Thoma and Tyler Cowen.

David Cho opens his story in the Washington Post with this bombshell:

Regulators had long classified a private Swiss energy conglomerate called Vitol as a trader that primarily helped industrial firms that needed oil to run their businesses.

But when the Commodity Futures Trading Commission examined Vitol's books last month, it found that the firm was in fact more of a speculator, holding oil contracts as a profit-making investment rather than a means of lining up the actual delivery of fuel.

Let's start with some background. The CFTC issues a report each week that summarizes the number of open futures contracts in

...

Kling’s question on oil speculation

James Hamilton (June 26th, 2008) Writes:
Article Source Arnold Kling poses a question for Paul Krugman. Here's how I would answer. Kling writes: Early in 2007, the price of oil was $60 a barrel. Recently, it has been above $130 a barrel. Which of the following does Paul Krugman believe: (a) market fundamentals justified $60 a barrel then, and they justify $130 a barrel now; or (b) market fundamentals justified a much higher price in 2007? ...We know that Krugman does not believe that today's oil price is out of line with fundamentals. Krugman's view, in effect, is that if speculators artificially boost the price of oil, then supply will exceed demand, and the excess has to go somewhere. Where are the inventories? This view ought to hold in reverse. If speculators artificially kept the price of oil too low early in 2007, then demand should have exceeded supply and inventories should have ...

How big a contribution could oil speculation be making?

James Hamilton (June 25th, 2008) Writes:
Article Source A key reason why oil prices have been going up is that Asia and the oil producing countries are consuming more while global oil production has stagnated. That means Europe and America had to consume less, and a very high price proved necessary to accomplish that. I do believe that speculation has been another factor that contributed to recent high oil prices. However, a key element of the bubble story is that there needs to be a very limited response of quantity demanded to the price increases, which the most recent data persuade me is no longer the case. Some of the estimates I've been hearing of the size of the contribution speculation is currently making to the price are therefore difficult to defend. Here I explain why, essentially elaborating on Paul Krugman's theme. Senator Barack Obama's (D-IL) recent proposal ...

Obama offers steps to curb oil speculation (DIG DUG)

Stockmasters Staff (June 24th, 2008) Writes:
Barack Obama has offered new steps to crack down on speculation in oil markets, saying his plan would help rein in runaway fuel costs. Let's review the details of Obama's plan, which will benefit investors by Shorting DIG and going Long DUG: * The Illinois senator's campaign said he would close the so-called Enron loophole that exempts some energy speculators from U.S. regulations that apply to commodities traded over exchanges. It takes its name from the energy giant that benefited from the law and later collapsed because of massive accounting fraud. * His plan would require ...

Newsletter

No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.