Why One-Party Dominance Is Dangerous For Stocks
Contrarian Profits (November 13th, 2008) Writes:
Throughout US history, the most dangerous time for stock markets has been when one party controls the White House and Congress, says Keith Fitz-Gerald. And when you account for inflation, it doesn’t really matter whether the Democrats or Republicans are in the driving seat.
This from Money Morning:
With the whipsaw trading we’ve seen of late, it appears that the U.S. financial markets are already chewing through the post-election honeymoon. I have to say that I, for one, am relieved that’s the case because it signals that the markets are already returning to normal.
I realize it may not feel that way, but there’s one very important thing to remember: We nearly always seem to receive the best news near, or at, market tops, and the worst news near, or at, market bottoms. Although that seems contradictory, it actually makes sense. And investors can take some solace in the fact that
...America, Barack Obama, Biotechnology, China, Congress, contrarian profits, Dow 30, energy, Iraq, Keith Fitz-Gerald, Korea, Latin America, Mark Skousen;, Market Commentary, Ned Davis, New Year's Day, Obama administration, Oil, Retail Sales, U.S. Capitol Building;, United States, Us Government, USD, Vietnam, White House


![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/silver/t24_ag_en_usoz_2.gif)



