<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stock Market News &#38; Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks &#187; Moody&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.straightstocks.com/tag/moodys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.straightstocks.com</link>
	<description>Leading Stock Market News, Opinions and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Baselines, Counterfactuals and the Stimulus</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/baselines-counterfactuals-and-the-stimulus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/baselines-counterfactuals-and-the-stimulus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Menzie Chinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/11/baselines_count.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Apropos the <a href="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/11/assessing_the_i.html">post</a> on evaluating the impact of the stimulus, here is graphical depiction of what IHS Global Insight, Macroeconomic Advisers, and Moody's predicted under the counterfactual of no stimulus against the w/stimulus outlook (from <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/business/economy/21stimulus.html">NYT</a>).</p>
<br />
<img alt="globalinsight_MAD_Moodys.jpg" src="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/11/globalinsight_MAD_Moodys.jpg" width="436" height="530" />

<br />Source: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/business/economy/21stimulus.html">J. Calmes and M. Cooper, "New Consensus Sees Stimulus Package as Worthy Step," NYT (Nov. 21, 2009)</a>.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/baselines-counterfactuals-and-the-stimulus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s Cuts UBS Ratings &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-cuts-ubs-ratings-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-cuts-ubs-ratings-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank financial strength rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment banking arm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment banking division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubs Ag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/27445/Moody%27s+Cuts+UBS+Ratings+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Moody's Investors Service has cut various ratings on <strong>UBS AG</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/UBS">UBS</a>) pointing out the significant challenges the company continues to face in its Investment Banking and Wealth Management businesses. <br />
<br />
Moody's has downgraded the bank financial strength rating and the long-term debt and deposit ratings of UBS AG. The bank financial strength rating was lowered two notches to C from B-, while its deposits and senior debt ratings were lowered to Aa3 from Aa2. The ratings for senior subordinated debt were slashed to A1 from Aa3. The outlook for all ratings is negative implying that further downgrades are possible over the next 12 to 18 months.<br />
 <br />
Moody&#8217;s has expressed its concern over the loss of customer confidence, which is reflected by the ongoing net fund money outflows in the wealth management business. Also a number of key employees have left the organization that resulted in a significant decline in the revenues of the investment banking division, particularly in the fixed income business. Though some early signs of recovery are being noticed, Moody&#8217;s believes that the current challenges will prolong. <br />
<br />
Moody&#8217;s also suspect that the investment banking division may suffer more losses from its exposure to bond insurers. Relative to its peers, the company has benefited less from the recent rebound in trading margins and capital market volumes. <br />
<br />
Swiss banks have enjoyed large foreign deposit inflows over the years as a result of the country&#8217;s tax system, which emphasizes extreme secrecy. However, the adoption of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development standards for tax cooperation coupled with the US Internal Revenue Service&#8217;s lawsuit against UBS has led to dilution of secrecy. The company is experiencing large fund outflows as worried investors are eyeing a safer refuge.<br />
 <br />
UBS&#8217;s third quarter results were disappointing as the company reported its fourth consecutive quarterly loss. The ongoing global economic turmoil has severely hurt the Swiss banking major&#8217;s balance sheet when the subprime crisis led to record losses. In particular, the investment banking arm of UBS experienced large trading losses. The company had to take a financial aid package from the Swiss government. In addition, the issues emanating from the dilution of Swiss banking secrecy will significantly challenge the company&#8217;s return to profitability.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UBS">Read the full analyst report on "UBS"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-cuts-ubs-ratings-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company News for November 10, 2009 &#8211; Corporate Summary</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-november-10-2009-corporate-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-november-10-2009-corporate-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdMob;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkshire Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burlington Northern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coca Cola Enterprises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kroger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micron Tech;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Southern Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polo Ralph Lauren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Priceline.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductor group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer season travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyco International;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells fargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xilinx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/27098/Company+News+for+November+10%2C+2009+-+Corporate+Summary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">&#8226; Priceline.com (NASDAQ:PCLN) reported adjusted third quarter earnings of $3.45 a share, 55 cents above consensus estimates, on better-than-expected revenues of $730.7 million, ahead of estimates of $$693.97 million on strong summer season travel. The firm provided fourth quarter guidance at about $1.06-$1.16</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:ERTS) said it plans to cut 1500 additional jobs. The firm reported second quarter adjusted earnings of 6 cents, a one penny miss, on revenues of $1.15 billion, which slightly topped Street projections of $1.12 billion. The firm forecast 2010 earnings of $0.70-$1.00, topping estimates of 89 cents on revenues of $4.2-$4.4 billion versus estimates of $4.26 billion</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Cadbury (NYSE:CBY) rejected the latest Kraft (NYSE:KFT) bid calling it "derisory"</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Moody's (NYSE:MCO) commented that AIG (NYSE:AIG) will be able to repay its Federal loans</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) lifted its growth expectations for the semiconductor group following release of third quarter numbers. Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) remained its first pick within the group, with "outperform" ratings also on Micron Tech (NYSE:MU) and Xilinx (NASDAQ:XLNX). Analysts increased 2010 growth expectations of 25% for the industry from 10-20% prior</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) added Polo Ralph Lauren (NYSE:RL) to its Conviction Buy List, with a price target of $94</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) also added Kroger (NYSE:KR) to its Conviction Buy List, with a price target of $27</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) removed Coca-Cola Enterprises (NYSE:CCE) from its Conviction Buy List, but maintained a "buy" rating on the shares</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Tyco International (NYSE:TYC) released better-than-expected third quarter earnings of 61 cents a share, 7 cents above estimates, on revenues of $4.42 billion, slightly higher than estimates of $4.32 billion</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Burlington Northern (NYSE:BNI) CEO advised Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A) is liquidating shares of rival railroads Norfolk Southern Corp. (NYSE:NSC) and Union Pacific (NYSE:UNP) as it readies its purchase of Burlington</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) moved further into the market for digital advertising on cell phones with the acquisition of AdMob for $750 million</p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-november-10-2009-corporate-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company News for October 29, 2009 &#8211; Corporate Summary</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-october-29-2009-corporate-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-october-29-2009-corporate-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colgate Palmolive;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newmont Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OfficeMax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procter Gamble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal dutch shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26609/Company+News+for+October+29%2C+2009+-+Corporate+Summary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">&#8226; Aetna (NYSE:AET) reported third quarter earnings of 69 cents a share, 3 cents better than Zacks estimates, on revenues of $8.72 billion, up 14.4%.  The company sees full year earnings of $2.75 a share</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; OfficeMax (NYSE:OMX) posted third quarter earnings of 8 cents, 6 cents below Zacks estimates on inline revenues of $1.83 billion, down 12.6%. The firm issued cautious guidance, anticipating macro employment trends will not turn positive well into 2010</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Nintendo (NASDAQ:NTDOY) posted first half profits off 52% to $768 million, while sales dropped 34.5%. The company slashed its dividend for the first half by 37%</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Newmont Mining (NYSE:NEM) reported third quarter earnings of 79 cents a share, 24 cents above Zacks estimates, as revenues of $2.05 billion, up 49.5%, bested Zacks estimates of $1.78 billion</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE:RDS.A) reported a 73% drop in net profit, with earnings ex-items of $2.62 billion slightly ahead of estimates of $2.55 billion. The company noted, "We see some indications that energy demand and pricing are improving, but the outlook remains very uncertain and we are not expecting a quick recovery"</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Motorola (NYSE:MOT) reported third quarter results of one penny on better-than-expected revenues of $5.45 billion. The company expects fourth quarter earnings from continuing operations of 7-9 cents</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE:CL) reported third quarter results of $1.12, one penny above Zacks estimates, of inline revenues of $4 billion, up 0.3%</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Moody's (NYSE:MCO) reported third quarter earnings of 43 cents a share, a nickel above Zacks expectations, on better-than-expected revenues of $452 million, up 4.2%</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Procter &#38; Gamble (NYSE:PG) posted fiscal first quarter earnings of $1.06, 9 cents above Zacks estimates, on inline revenues of $19.8 billion, down 6%</p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-october-29-2009-corporate-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Southwest&#8217;s Ratings Go South &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/southwests-ratings-go-south-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/southwests-ratings-go-south-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing 737-700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business travel;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher energy costs;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southwest Airlines Co.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard and Poor's Ratings Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26056/Southwest%27s+Ratings+Go+South+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Standard &#38; Poor's Ratings Services has lowered its ratings on <strong>Southwest Airlines Co. </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/luv">LUV</a>), lowering the debt ratings to 'BBB' from 'BBB+&#8217; and placing it with negative implications. However, Southwest has retained its investment grade rating.<br />
<br />
The downgrade reflects lower operating cash flow caused by record high fuel prices, low global demand for air travel and weak prices. The travel downturn has eroded the airline's flow of cash at a time when the airline faces substantial fixed obligations and declining cash balances. Southwest's cash balance fell to $902 million in the third quarter from $1.4 billion at the end of 2008.<br />
<br />
Recently, Southwest borrowed $124 million under a new term loan agreement secured by five Boeing 737-700 aircrafts. It also replaced its previous $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a new $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility that will expire in Oct. 2012. The rating agency is also concerned by this move as it leads to incremental debt in its capital structure.<br />
<br />
The rating downgrade could make it more difficult and expensive for Southwest Airlines to borrow money in the future or refinance its current debt portfolio.<br />
<br />
The negative outlook reflects concerns about potential earnings volatility on the back of higher energy costs and delay in turnaround of business travel.<br />
<br />
Earlier during July, Moody's as well as Fitch downgraded Southwest's credit rating on unsecured debt and some other categories of debt with a negative outlook.<br />
<br />
On the same day that its rating was downgraded, the airline reported a third quarter net loss of $16 million or 2 cents a share compared to a loss of $120 million, or 16 cents a share in the year-ago period. Operating revenue fell nearly 8% to $2.7 billion from $2.9 billion.<br />
<br />
Southwest has been implementing additional revenue generating measures such as fees for pets and "early bird" seating, which are expected to boost its other revenues going forward. However, the visibility regarding operating environment remains unclear given the fuel price volatility and depressed economic environment.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=LUV">Read the full analyst report on "LUV"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/southwests-ratings-go-south-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s Downgrades Boeing  &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-downgrades-boeing-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-downgrades-boeing-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[787]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cargo services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military aerospace products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Aeronautics and Space Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-airplane products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space systems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25968/Moody%27s+Downgrades+Boeing++-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Moody&#8217;s Investor Services</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MCO">MCO</a>) has downgraded <strong>Boeing Co.</strong>&#8217;s (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BA">BA</a>) rating outlook to "negative" from "stable". The major reason for the downgrade was the delay in the airplane maker's new 787 series, besides other setbacks that had hurt its financial flexibility.<br />
 <br />
Pitted against Airbus&#8217;s A319 aircraft, Boeing&#8217;s 787 series is plagued by delays. The inaugural test flight at the end of fiscal 2009 is more than two years behind the original delivery schedule. The company has already deferred the inaugural delivery of the 787 series aircraft five times.<br />
 <br />
Boeing has witnessed falling orders in the recent times for its commercial planes on account of tepid demand for air travel and cargo services. Already, a slew of commercial airlines have cancelled or deferred their fleet additions. Boeing has cut costs and announced reduction in its workforce along with scaling back production of some aircrafts. Moody's estimates a 20% production cut would affect Boeing's operating profit by around $1 billion per year. Boeing has nearly doubled its corporate debt this year due to the acquisition of 787-related businesses, the payout under guaranty and the ramp-up of inventory levels.<br />
 <br />
Headquartered in Chicago, Boeing is the world&#8217;s largest manufacturer of commercial jet liners and military aerospace products (based on total sales). Boeing designs and produces commercial airplanes, defense systems, and civil and defense space systems. It is also the largest NASA contractor. Non-airplane products include helicopters, electronic and defense systems, missiles, satellites, rocket engines, launch vehicles, and advanced information and communication systems.</p>
<p>We maintain our market Neutral recommendation on the shares.</p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BA">Read the full analyst report on "BA"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MCO">Read the full analyst report on "MCO"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-downgrades-boeing-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Moody&#8217;s Investor Services, American Tower Corp, Crown Castle International, SBA Communications Corp and US Airways &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-moodys-investor-services-american-tower-corp-crown-castle-international-sba-communications-corp-and-us-airways-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-moodys-investor-services-american-tower-corp-crown-castle-international-sba-communications-corp-and-us-airways-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Tower Corp;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[base-station equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband wireless data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crown Castle International;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBA Communications Corp.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upgrades American Tower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volatile oil prices;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless tower industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25598/Zacks+Analyst+Blog+Highlights%3A+Moody%27s+Investor+Services%2C+American+Tower+Corp%2C+Crown+Castle+International%2C+SBA+Communications+Corp+and+US+Airways+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><strong>For Immediate Release</strong></p>
<p align="left">Chicago, IL &#8211; October 7, 2009 &#8211; Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: <strong>Moody&#8217;s Investor Services </strong>(<a href="void(0)">MCO</a>), <strong>American Tower Corp</strong> (<a href="void(0)">AMT</a>), <strong>Crown Castle International </strong>(<a href="void(0)">CCI</a>), <strong>SBA Communications Corp </strong>(<a href="void(0)">SBAC</a>) and <strong>US Airways </strong>(<a href="void(0)">LCC</a>).</p>
<p align="left">Get the most recent insight from Zacks Equity Research with the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513</a></p>
<p align="left">Here are highlights from Tuesday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/AnalystBlog">Analyst Blog</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><strong>Moody's Upgrades American Tower</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Moody&#8217;s Investor Services </strong>(<a href="void(0)">MCO</a>) has upgraded the rating of <strong>American Tower Corp</strong> (<a href="void(0)">AMT</a>) senior unsecured debt. So far, this paper has been given a &#8220;Ba1" rating by Moody&#8217;s which implies a junk corporate rating and probability of default rating.</p>
<p align="left">Now Moody&#8217;s has raised its rating to &#8220;Baa3," implying its lowest investment-grade rating. Major reasons for this debt rating upgrade were the company&#8217;s strong operating performance, increased cash flow and reduced debt over the past two years.</p>
<p align="left">American Tower accounts for most of its revenue from long-term (typically 5-10 year) tower leases with major wireless carriers. In addition, the company provides on-site maintenance and servicing of antennas, amplifiers and base-station equipment as it relates to leasing. This generates a strong long-term lease up-cycle.</p>
<p align="left">The revenue generated from leasing and management of such networks is impressive, and over 95% is recurring in nature. Yearly revenue increased 9.4% in fiscal 2008 compared to the previous year. In the first half of 2009, total revenue was $832 million, up 7.2% compared to the prior-year period.</p>
<p align="left">Mobile subscriber growth has significantly expanded the wireless tower industry. We believe, future financials are likely to be propelled by strong demand for wireless voice, broadband wireless data and video networks which require more tower space. Deployments of 3G and emerging 4G networks will also create impressive demand for tower leasing.</p>
<p align="left">American Tower maintains one of the strongest EBITDA margins in the industry. EBITDA margin for the most recent quarter was 68%, well above its peers <strong>Crown Castle International </strong>(<a href="void(0)">CCI</a>) and <strong>SBA Communications Corp </strong>(<a href="void(0)">SBAC</a>).</p>
<p align="left"><strong>US Airways Traffic Falls</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>US Airways </strong>(<a href="void(0)">LCC</a>) announced preliminary mainline traffic results for Sept. 2009. The company reported a drop in mainline passenger load factor to 79.3% from 80.1% last year. Total scheduled mainline revenue passenger miles (RPMs) decreased 1.6% to $4.6 billion on a capacity decrease of 0.6% in scheduled mainline available seat miles (ASMs), compared with the same period in 2008.</p>
<p align="left">Consolidated (mainline and express) passenger revenue per available seat mile (PRASM) decreased approximately 15%, versus the same period last year, while total revenue per available seat mile decreased approximately 14% on a year-over-year basis.</p>
<p align="left">The airline has been struggling with volatile oil prices, increased competition and decline in travel. The company has taken aggressive action to address the weakening demand by reducing capacity, introducing additional revenue streams, and prudently cost control. However, consolidated PRASM was also down 1.2% during September.</p>
<p align="left">Want more from Zacks Equity Research? Subscribe to the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks Equity Research</strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.</p>
<p align="left">Continuous coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.</p>
<p align="left">Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517</a></p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks </strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.</p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/zacksresearch">http://twitter.com/zacksresearch</a></p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a></p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.</p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />
Mark Vickery<br />
Web Content Editor<br />
312-265-9380<br />
Visit: <a href="www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a></p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left"> </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-moodys-investor-services-american-tower-corp-crown-castle-international-sba-communications-corp-and-us-airways-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s Upgrades American Tower &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-upgrades-american-tower-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-upgrades-american-tower-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Tower Corp;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[base-station equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband wireless data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBA Communications Corp.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upgrades American Tower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless tower industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless tower sights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25556/Moody%27s+Upgrades+American+Tower+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>Moody&#8217;s Investor Services </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mco">MCO</a>) has upgraded the rating of <strong>American Tower Corp&#8217;s</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/amt">AMT</a>) senior unsecured debt. So far, this paper has been given a &#8220;Ba1" rating by Moody&#8217;s which implies a junk corporate rating and probability of default rating.<br />
<br />
Now Moody&#8217;s has raised its rating to &#8220;Baa3," implying its lowest investment-grade rating. Major reasons for this debt rating upgrade were the company&#8217;s strong operating performance, increased cash flow and reduced debt over the past two years.<br />
<br />
American Tower accounts for most of its revenue from long-term (typically 5-10 year) tower leases with major wireless carriers. In addition, the company provides on-site maintenance and servicing of antennas, amplifiers and base-station equipment as it relates to leasing. This generates a strong long-term lease up-cycle.<br />
<br />
The revenue generated from leasing and management of such networks is impressive, and over 95% is recurring in nature. Yearly revenue increased 9.4% in fiscal 2008 compared to the previous year. In the first half of 2009, total revenue was $832 million, up 7.2% compared to the prior-year period.<br />
<br />
Mobile subscriber growth has significantly expanded the wireless tower industry. We believe, future financials are likely to be propelled by strong demand for wireless voice, broadband wireless data and video networks which require more tower space. Deployments of 3G and emerging 4G networks will also create impressive demand for tower leasing.<br />
<br />
American Tower maintains one of the strongest EBITDA margins in the industry. EBITDA margin for the most recent quarter was 68%, well above its peers <strong>Crown Castle International</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cci">CCI</a>) and<strong> SBA Communications Corp</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/sbac">SBAC</a>).<br />
<br />
During the first half of 2009, American Tower generated $295 million of free cash flow (cash flow less capital expenditure) compared to $262 million in the prior-year period. The company enjoys stable operating costs. With the tower industry moving forward, operating cash flow is likely to accelerate. As of now, the company has more than $9 billion worth of non-cancelable lease backlog. At the current revenue run-rate, this constitutes approximately 6 years of lease backlog.<br />
<br />
In addition, American Tower is quickly expanding its business operations in various emerging markets. Besides Brazil and Mexico, it has taken a major initiative to expand operations in India. Geographic expansion increases the total number of American Tower controlled wireless tower sights to over 26,000. This will generate a sustainable business in the long-run.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AMT">Read the full analyst report on "AMT"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MCO">Read the full analyst report on "MCO"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CCI">Read the full analyst report on "CCI"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=SBAC">Read the full analyst report on "SBAC"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-upgrades-american-tower-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wilmington Trust (WL) &#8211; Bear of the Day</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wilmington-trust-wl-bear-of-the-day-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wilmington-trust-wl-bear-of-the-day-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate lending concentration;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/12316/Wilmington+Trust+%28WL%29+-+Bear+of+the+Day</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wilmington Trust's (<a href=http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wl>WL</a>) second-quarter earnings came in ahead of the Zacks Consensus Estimate, aided by strong growth in client services business and improvement in net interest margin. However, credit
quality deteriorated drastically during the reported quarter.
<p>
In 2009, both S&#038;P and Moody's lowered their outlooks on the company to negative and downgraded the ratings based on concerns related to its real estate lending concentration. Though loan growth has been impressive relative to many of its peers in
the past, the pace of growth has started to moderate in the last few quarters.
</p><p>
We expect the pace to slow down further in the near to medium-term, based on the ongoing weakness in the economy. Thus, we are maintaining our Underperform recommendation.<a href="http://www.zacks.com" alt="Investment Research">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wilmington-trust-wl-bear-of-the-day-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Willis Tender Offer Results &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/willis-tender-offer-results-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/willis-tender-offer-results-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general corporate purposes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weak insurance markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willis Group Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willis North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25468/Willis+Tender+Offer+Results+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Willis North America Inc., a subsidiary of <strong>Willis Group Holdings Limited</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/WSH">WSH</a>), today announced the final results of its cash tender offer to purchase any and all of its 5.125% senior notes due 2010.
<p>The net proceeds from the offer came to $159,788,000. All of the 2010 notes that were tendered have been guaranteed for payment by Willis. The holders of the 2010 notes will be entitled to receive tender offer consideration of $1,027.50 per $1,000 principal amount of the 2010 notes, plus any accrued and unpaid interest.</p>
<p>The notes, which are guaranteed by Willis Group Holdings, carry ratings of Baa3 by Moody's and BBB- by S&#38;P.</p>
<p><strong>Bank of America</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BAC">BAC</a>) and <strong>JPMorgan Chase</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/JPM">JPM</a>) were the joint book running managers for the sale.</p>
<p>Willis intends to use the net proceeds from this offering to purchase any and all of Willis North America's outstanding 5.125% senior notes due 2010 that are tendered and accepted in a separate offering. Any remaining proceeds will then be used for general corporate purposes.</p>
<p>Willis Group Holdings' second-quarter profit of 52 cents per share was just a penny ahead of the Zacks Consensus Estimate. Results reflected growth in Global operations (7% organic growth) and International (5%), partly offset by a fall in organic commissions and fees in North America (down 8%). Weak insurance markets coupled with the deepening U.S. economic crisis led to a decline in the North American segment's commissions and fees.</p>
<p>However, the company is experiencing strong organic growth in revenues from its International business and Global segments, with steady client retention levels and momentum from the "Shaping Our Future" growth initiatives contributing to the organic growth.</p>
<p>While we expect Willis to benefit from the rate stabilization in the reinsurance segment, we anticipate top-line growth to be curtailed as a result of the overall less-than-robust economic environment. Nevertheless, the company's cost-saving initiatives and capital-bolstering moves bode well. Hence we have a Neutral recommendation on the shares of Willis.</p>
<p> </p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WSH">Read the full analyst report on "WSH"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BAC">Read the full analyst report on "BAC"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=JPM">Read the full analyst report on "JPM"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/willis-tender-offer-results-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citi Again Issues Guaranteed Debt &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/citi-again-issues-guaranteed-debt-analyst-blog-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/citi-again-issues-guaranteed-debt-analyst-blog-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book-running manager for the sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fdic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fitch Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Poors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25436/Citi+Again+Issues+Guaranteed+Debt+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
On Tuesday, <strong>Citigroup Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/c">C</a>) sold 4-part fixed and floating-rate notes worth $5.0 billion guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP).<br />
<br />
The notes belonging to the first tranche worth $1.25 billion carry a coupon rate of 1.25% and will mature on Nov 15, 2011. The notes will pay coupons semi-annually with the first payment expected on May 15, 2010.<br />
<br />
The notes belonging to the second tranche worth $250 million carry a coupon rate of 3 basis points (bps) below the 3-month London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and will also mature on Nov 15, 2011. The notes will pay coupons quarterly with the first payment expected on Feb. 15, 2010.<br />
<br />
The notes belonging to the third tranche worth $1.0 million carry a coupon rate equivalent to 3-month London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and will mature on Nov. 15, 2012. The notes will pay coupons quarterly with the first payment expected on Feb. 15, 2010.<br />
<br />
The notes belonging to the fourth tranche worth $2.5 billion million carry a coupon rate of 1.875% and will also mature on Nov. 15, 2012. The notes will pay coupons semi-annually with the first payment expected on May 15, 2010.<br />
<br />
Citigroup was the sole book-running manager for the sale. All the notes are non-callable and have been assigned a "AAA" rating by Standard &#38; Poor's Ratings Services (S&#38;P), Fitch Ratings and <strong>Moody's </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mco">MCO</a>).<br />
<br />
FDIC-backed debt is cheaper to issue than normal debt because investors are willing to accept a lower interest rate associated with lower risk coming from a government guarantee. Just 2 weeks ago, Citi had completed a sale of $5 billion government-backed debt offering.<br />
<br />
Citigroup, once the largest U.S. bank by assets, fell behind last year after a series of acquisitions by rivals. The bank has been severely hurt by billions in losses and write-downs of problem loans and toxic assets.<br />
<br />
The U.S. government injected $45 billion in bailout funds into the bank, $25 billion of which was recently converted to a 34% equity ownership stake. Top-level management at the company is conceiving plans to downsize the government's stake in the company through a multibillion-dollar stock offering.<br />
<br />
However, the latest offering does not seem to bode well for its efforts to exit from the government's stake. The debt issues could now reinforce the perception that Citigroup still does not demonstrate adequate capital and liquidity and hence delay the sale of the government's stake in the company.<br />
<br />
Citi has issued $15.4 billion in non-guaranteed debt this year, compared to $54.6 billion in guaranteed debt issued since the FDIC program was initiated in the fourth quarter of 2008.<br />
<br />
Citigroup will release its third quarter 2009 earnings on Oct. 15, 2009 with a conference call scheduled later in the day to discuss its results. Ahead of its results, we maintain our Neutral recommendation on the stock.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=C">Read the full analyst report on "C"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MCO">Read the full analyst report on "MCO"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/citi-again-issues-guaranteed-debt-analyst-blog-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wilmington Trust (WL) &#8211; Bear of the Day</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wilmington-trust-wl-bear-of-the-day-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wilmington-trust-wl-bear-of-the-day-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate lending concentration;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/12288/Wilmington+Trust+%28WL%29+-+Bear+of+the+Day</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wilmington Trust's (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wl">WL</a>) second-quarter earnings came in ahead of the Zacks Consensus Estimate, aided by strong growth in client services business and improvement in net interest margin.
<p>
However, credit quality deteriorated drastically during the reported quarter. In 2009, both S&#38;P and Moody's lowered their outlooks on the company to negative and downgraded the ratings based on concerns related to its real estate lending concentration. Though loan growth has been impressive relative to many of its peers in the past, the pace of growth has started to moderate in the last few quarters.
</p><p>
We expect the pace to slow down further in the near to medium-term, based on the ongoing weakness in the economy. Thus, we are maintaining our Underperform recommendation.<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wilmington-trust-wl-bear-of-the-day-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citi Again Issues Guaranteed Debt &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/citi-again-issues-guaranteed-debt-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/citi-again-issues-guaranteed-debt-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book-running manager for the sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fdic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fitch Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Poors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25392/Citi+Again+Issues+Guaranteed+Debt+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
On Tuesday, <strong>Citigroup Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/C">C</a>) sold 4-part fixed and floating-rate notes worth $5.0 billion guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). <br />
<br />
The notes belonging to the first tranche worth $1.25 billion carry a coupon rate of 1.25% and will mature on Nov 15, 2011. The notes will pay coupons semi-annually with the first payment expected on May 15, 2010. <br />
<br />
The notes belonging to the second tranche worth $250 million carry a coupon rate of 3 basis points (bps) below the 3-month London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and will also mature on Nov 15, 2011. The notes will pay coupons quarterly with the first payment expected on Feb 15, 2010. <br />
<br />
The notes belonging to the third tranche worth $1.0 million carry a coupon rate equivalent to 3-month London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and will mature on Nov 15, 2012. The notes will pay coupons quarterly with the first payment expected on Feb 15, 2010. <br />
<br />
The notes belonging to the fourth tranche worth $2.5 billion million carry a coupon rate of 1.875% and will also mature on Nov 15, 2012. The notes will pay coupons semi-annually with the first payment expected on May 15, 2010. <br />
<br />
Citigroup was the sole book-running manager for the sale. All the notes are non-callable and have been assigned a 'AAA' rating by Standard &#38; Poor's Ratings Services (S&#38;P), Fitch Ratings and Moody's. <br />
<br />
FDIC-backed debt is cheaper to issue than normal debt because investors are willing to accept a lower interest rate associated with lower risk coming from a government guarantee. Just 2 weeks ago, Citi had completed a sale of $5 billion government-backed debt offering. <br />
<br />
Citigroup, once the largest U.S. bank by assets, fell behind last year after a series of acquisitions by rivals. The bank has been severely hurt by billions in losses and write-downs of problem loans and toxic assets. <br />
<br />
The U.S. government injected $45 billion in bailout funds into the bank, $25 billion of which was recently converted to a 34% equity ownership stake. Top-level management at the company is conceiving plans to downsize the government&#8217;s stake in the company through a multibillion-dollar stock offering. <br />
<br />
However, the latest offering does not seem to bode well for its efforts to exit from the government's stake. The debt issues could now reinforce the perception that Citigroup still does not demonstrate adequate capital and liquidity and hence delay the sale of the government&#8217;s stake in the company. <br />
<br />
Citi has issued $15.4 billion in non-guaranteed debt this year, compared to $54.6 billion in guaranteed debt issued since the FDIC program was initiated in the fourth quarter of 2008. <br />
<br />
Citigroup will release its third quarter 2009 earnings on Oct 15, 2009 with a conference call scheduled later in the day to discuss its results. Ahead of its results, we maintain our Neutral recommendation on the stock.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=C">Read the full analyst report on "C"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/citi-again-issues-guaranteed-debt-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citi Issues Senior Notes &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/citi-issues-senior-notes-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/citi-issues-senior-notes-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book-running manager for the sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of the Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fitch Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general corporate purposes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peaceful Trading - Vlad Moraru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Poors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25012/Citi+Issues+Senior+Notes+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
On Thursday, <strong>Citigroup Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/c">C</a>) sold 5-year senior notes worth $2.0 billion. The notes are not guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).<br />
<br />
The notes, which were issued at a discounted price of $99.495, are non-callable and are expected to yield about 325 basis points over U.S. Treasuries. They carry a coupon rate of 5.5% and will mature on October 15, 2014. The notes will pay coupons semi-annually with the first payment expected on April 15, 2010. The company will use the proceeds of the debentures for general corporate purposes.<br />
<br />
Standard &#38; Poor's (S&#38;P) has assigned an 'A' rating to the notes, while Fitch Ratings and Moody's have assigned 'A+' and 'A3' rating to the notes, respectively.<br />
<br />
Citigroup was the sole book-running manager for the sale.<br />
<br />
The debt issue is in sharp contrast to the top-level management&#8217;s plans at Citigroup to downsize the U.S. government's 34% stake in the company through a multibillion-dollar stock offering. Under the plan, Citigroup would issue new shares to the public and the Treasury Department would sell at least a portion of its Citigroup holdings. The debt issues may reinforce the perception that Citigroup still does not demonstrate adequate capital and liquidity, and hence will delay the sale of the government&#8217;s stake in the company.<br />
<br />
Citigroup will release its third quarter 2009 earnings on October 15, 2009 with a conference call scheduled later in the day to discuss its results. Ahead of its results, we maintain our Neutral recommendation on the stock.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=C">Read the full analyst report on "C"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/citi-issues-senior-notes-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: FedEx Corp., United Parcel Service Inc., UBS AG, Moody&#8217;s Corp. and McGraw-Hill &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-fedex-corp-united-parcel-service-inc-ubs-ag-moodys-corp-and-mcgraw-hill-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-fedex-corp-united-parcel-service-inc-ubs-ag-moodys-corp-and-mcgraw-hill-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Superior Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit ratings agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FedEx Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fitch Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Blawie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mcgraw Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memphis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pursuit Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities And Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Poors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology bubble;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubs Ag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Parcel Service Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24761/Zacks+Analyst+Blog+Highlights%3A+FedEx+Corp.%2C+United+Parcel+Service+Inc.%2C+UBS+AG%2C+Moody%27s+Corp.+and+McGraw-Hill+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><strong>For Immediate Release</strong></p>
<p align="left">Chicago, IL &#8211; September 14, 2009 &#8211; Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: <strong>FedEx Corp. </strong>(<a href="void(0)">FDX</a>), <strong>United Parcel Service Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">SNDA</a>), <strong>UBS AG </strong>(<a href="void(0)">UBS</a>), <strong>Moody&#8217;s Corp. </strong>(<a href="void(0)">MCO</a>) and <strong>McGraw-Hill </strong>(<a href="void(0)">MHP</a>).</p>
<p align="left">Get the most recent insight from Zacks Equity Research with the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513</a></p>
<p align="left">Here are highlights from Friday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/AnalystBlog">Analyst Blog</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><strong>FedEx Preannouncement Beats</strong></p>
<p align="left">Shares of <strong>FedEx Corp. </strong>(<a href="void(0)">FDX</a>) have jumped more than 5% so far today after the company preannounced fiscal first-quarter earnings, which topped Wall Street expectations.</p>
<p align="left">The package-delivery major said that it expects to post earnings of 58 cents per share, which is well above its guidance of 30 cents to 45 cents as well as the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 43 cents per share. The company reported earnings of $1.23 per share in the year-ago quarter.</p>
<p align="left">The Memphis, TN-based company also stated that fiscal second-quarter earnings is expected to range between 65 cents and 95 cents per share, which is in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 71 cents per share derived from 15 covering analysts. The guidance is still well below the year-ago earnings of $1.58 per share.</p>
<p align="left">FedEx attributed the better-than-expected first quarter earnings to improved International Priority (IP) shipping volumes and management&#8217;s cost cutting efforts. The IP service generated revenues of nearly $7 billion and contributed about 19.6% towards total revenue during fiscal 2009.</p>
<p align="left">However, the company added that revenue per shipment dipped year over year in each of the transportation segments amid a competitive pricing environment coupled with significant overcapacity in less-than-truckload (LTL) freight market. The company, which competes with <strong>United Parcel Service Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">SNDA</a>), also said that the second quarter guidance incorporates the current outlook on fuel prices and a modest recovery in global economic conditions.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>Moody's Under SEC Axe</strong></p>
<p align="left">Swiss banking giant <strong>UBS AG </strong>(<a href="void(0)">UBS</a>) was recently ordered to pledge its assets or provide bonds worth $35 million by Judge John Blawie at Connecticut Superior Court. The unfavorable order came as a blow after reports claimed that top credit ratings agencies had committed a securities fraud by providing insider trading information to the bank.</p>
<p align="left">Stanford-based hedge fund Pursuit Partners claimed that UBS had entered a deal to sell its investment-grade collateralized debt obligation (CDO) notes in 2007 with the prior knowledge that the securities were about to be downgraded.</p>
<p align="left">The proceedings revealed that the rating agencies <strong>Moody&#8217;s Corp. </strong>(<a href="void(0)">MCO</a>) and Standard &#38; Poor's provided insider information to UBS regarding their impending decision to downgrade some of the CDOs the bank was selling. The credit crunch led the securities to default only months after they were sold and UBS used the situation to its advantage.</p>
<p align="left">The Court order came at the end of a one-week hearing, where various UBS employees testified and related documents, including internal UBS e-mails, were reviewed. However, UBS pledged innocence saying that the Court&#8217;s decision was a routine procedure, requiring defendants to provide security during the case proceedings.</p>
<p align="left">The UBS litigation reflects a negative sentiment that has built up against large credit rating agencies for sharing furtive connections with big investment banks. This would certainly hurt Moody&#8217;s goodwill and highlight the fact that rating agencies can be bought. The integrity of the company and its ratings are in question.</p>
<p align="left">Moody&#8217;s allegedly hastened the credit crisis earlier in the decade by assigning top ratings to mortgage-backed securities that deteriorated later. Moreover, it is being probed by regulators worldwide, with several ongoing reviews in Europe for rating a European debt product, constant proportion debt obligations (CPDOs), at a higher-than-merited AAA.</p>
<p align="left">The SEC has designed various measures to stop the practice of corporations seeking to buy favorable ratings by negotiating fees with raters. Although Moody&#8217;s is not ultimately compensated on the accuracy of its ratings, we believe it will face large penalties similar to investment banks in the wake of the technology bubble earlier in the decade.</p>
<p align="left">The SEC is expected to hold a meeting on Sept. 17 to vote on proposed rules for credit rating agencies and pose restrictions on controversial flash orders. Regulators will also vote on the subject on adopting previously proposed rules to improve credit rating practices. The major credit rating agencies under the scrutiny would be Moody's, <strong>McGraw-Hill </strong>(<a href="void(0)">MHP</a>), Standard &#38; Poor's and Fitch Ratings.</p>
<p align="left">Want more from Zacks Equity Research? Subscribe to the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks Equity Research</strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.</p>
<p align="left">Continuous coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.</p>
<p align="left">Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517</a></p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks </strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.</p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/zacksresearch">http://twitter.com/zacksresearch</a></p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a></p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.</p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />
Mark Vickery<br />
Web Content Editor<br />
312-265-9380<br />
Visit: <a href="www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a></p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left"> </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-fedex-corp-united-parcel-service-inc-ubs-ag-moodys-corp-and-mcgraw-hill-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MetLife Issues Fixed Rate Notes &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/metlife-issues-fixed-rate-notes-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/metlife-issues-fixed-rate-notes-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Suisse Group AG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank Ag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general corporate purposes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MetLife Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Poors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24723/MetLife+Issues+Fixed+Rate+Notes+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
On Sep 10, 2009, Metropolitan Life Global Funding I, a unit of <strong>MetLife Inc</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MET">MET</a>) announced the sale of fixed-rate funding agreement-backed notes in the 144a private placement market worth $1 billion. The size of the deal represents a 100% increase from the originally planned $500 million. <br />
<br />
<strong>Bank of America Corporation</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BAC">BAC</a>), <strong>Credit Suisse Group AG</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CS">CS</a>), and <strong>Deutsche Bank AG</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/DB">DB</a>) were the joint book-running managers for the sale.   <br />
<br />
The notes are non-callable and carry a coupon rate of 2.875% and will mature on Sep 17, 2012. The notes will pay coupons semi-annually with the first payment expected on Mar 17, 2010. The company will use the sale proceeds of the debentures for general corporate purposes.<br />
<br />
Standard &#38;Poor's Ratings Services (S&#38;P) assigned 'AA-' rating while Moody's assigned 'AA2' rating to the notes.   <br />
<br />
MetLife&#8217;s second-quarter earnings came in much ahead of the Zacks Consensus Estimate, aided by strong top-line growth and rebounding markets. The company's capital position remains one of the sturdiest in the industry as reconfirmed by the capital assessment process conducted by the Fed. However, results continued to be negatively impacted by investment losses, lower investment income and recent rating downgrades. <br />
<br />
While we think MetLife should continue to benefit from its diversified business mix as well as its leading brand, higher losses in the investment portfolio will impact the results in the coming quarters. We are maintaining our Neutral recommendation on the shares.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MET">Read the full analyst report on "MET"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BAC">Read the full analyst report on "BAC"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CS">Read the full analyst report on "CS"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=DB">Read the full analyst report on "DB"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/metlife-issues-fixed-rate-notes-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s Lifts Ford Outlook &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-lifts-ford-outlook-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-lifts-ford-outlook-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance arm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford Motor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24550/Moody%27s+Lifts+Ford+Outlook+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Moody's Investors Service has improved its rating on <strong>Ford Motor</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/F">F</a>), triggered by intensive restructuring in the company. The agency raised Ford's corporate family rating by two notches to Caa1, though seven steps below investment grade. The agency has also revealed its wish to raise Ford's finance arm &#8211; Ford Motor Credit&#8217;s senior unsecured rating, now Caa1. <br />
<br />
The agency commented that Ford has successfully overcome the period of worst downturn in the industry by establishing a sustainable cost structure. Its ratings upgrade will now affect about $25 billion of debt at the company. <br />
<br />
Ford, the only Detroit 3 survivor from bankruptcy in 2009, reported a net income of $2.3 billion or 69 cents per share, after adjusting for special items, for the second quarter of the year. This was well above the Zacks Consensus Estimate loss of 55 cents per share and a net loss of $3.88 per share in the prior year quarter. <br />
<br />
In the quarter, Ford was well on the track to reduce its Automotive debt obligations by $10.1 billion, which will save more than $500 million a year in interest expense. Automotive structural cost shrunk $1.8 billion in the quarter, including $1.2 billion in North America. <br />
<br />
Ford targeted to reduce Automotive structural costs by $4 billion in 2009 as drafted in its business plan last year. Overall, the company reduced Automotive structural costs by $3.6 billion in the first half of the year. <br />
<br />
Further, the U.S. Government's "Cash for Clunkers" incentive program has boosted Ford&#8217;s sales in the recent months. The company has announced raising production targets due to the demand for its fuel-efficient vehicles generated by the program.<br />
<br />
In August, the company revealed a 17% rise in sales to 181,826 cars and light trucks. Two models &#8211; Focus and Escape SUV &#8211; ranked fourth and tenth in the Cash for Clunkers program top-10 buy list, respectively &#8211; spurred the company&#8217;s sales. <br />
<br />
We continue to recommend the shares of Ford as Neutral with a target price of $8.00.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=F">Read the full analyst report on "F"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-lifts-ford-outlook-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Bancorp Issues Senior Notes &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/us-bancorp-issues-senior-notes-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/us-bancorp-issues-senior-notes-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book-runner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fitch Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general corporate purposes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Poors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stressed residential real estate markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Bancorp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24447/US+Bancorp+Issues+Senior+Notes+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
On Sept. 2, 2009, <strong>US Bancorp</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/usb">USB</a>) announced the sale of 3.5 year senior notes worth $350 million. The size of the deal represents a 40% increase from the originally planned $250 million.<br />
 <br />
<strong>Barclays</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/bcs">BCS</a>) acted as the sole book-runner for the sale of these notes. The notes carry a coupon rate of 2.125% and will mature on Feb 15, 2013. The notes will pay coupons semi-annually with the first payment expected on Feb 15, 2010. The company will use the sale proceeds of the debentures for general corporate purposes.<br />
<br />
Standard &#38;Poor's Ratings Services (S&#38;P) assigned an 'A+' rating while Fitch ratings assigned an 'AA-' rating to the senior notes. Moody's assigned US Bancorp&#8217;s 'AA3' rating to the notes.<br />
<br />
US Bancorp&#8217;s second quarter earnings of 12 cents per share were a penny short of the Zacks Consensus Estimate, reflecting deteriorating credit quality. However, we have been encouraged by the company&#8217;s exit from the TARP program. Despite the dilutive impact, the recent capital bolstering initiatives are also viewed positively as these will not only reduce government intervention but also help in maintaining a strong capital base in a soft economic environment.<br />
 <br />
Nevertheless, we think that the stressed residential real estate markets and mortgage-related industries and the impact from the U.S. economic issues on commercial and retail customers will continue to weigh on USB shares. Hence, we have a Neutral recommendation on the stock.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=USB">Read the full analyst report on "USB"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BCS">Read the full analyst report on "BCS"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/us-bancorp-issues-senior-notes-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s Confident About U.S. &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-confident-about-u-s-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-confident-about-u-s-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Express Company;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American International Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of New York Mellon Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BB&T Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of Management and Budget;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Street Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Bancorp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24268/Moody%27s+Confident+About+U.S.+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Moody's Investors Service on Friday affirmed its Aaa credit rating on the United States. The action considers the country&#8217;s ability to survive the credit crisis, its political stability and favorable long-term economic prospects.<br />
<br />
Though the rising debt burden could threaten the creditworthiness of the world's largest economy, much of the debt the country is accumulating is backed by equity and securities purchases, which lessens the negative effect on the government's net worth.<br />
<br />
According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve have injected about $12 trillion to revive the economy and credit markets. As a result, the budget deficit is expected to reach $1.6 trillion this year and $1.4 trillion next year. In its mid-year economic review, the Office of Management and Budget increased its estimate of the 10-year deficit by almost $2 trillion from the previous level to $9.05 trillion.<br />
<br />
The U.S. government has also invested hundreds of billions of dollars to rescue many financial institutions including<strong> American International Group</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aig">AIG</a>) and<strong> Citigroup</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/c">C</a>) as part of its goal to stimulate the economy. These spending programs have also increased debt.<br />
<br />
Most banks still have short-term debt guaranteed by the government. However, some large financial firms have repaid the government funds, including <strong>Morgan Stanley</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ms">MS</a>), <strong>Bank of New York Mellon Corporation</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/bk">BK</a>),<strong> Goldman Sachs</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/gs">GS</a>), <strong>U.S. Bancorp </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/usb">USB</a>),<strong> American Express Company </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/axp">AXP</a>), <strong>BB&#38;T Corporation</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/bbt">BBT</a>) and <strong>State Street Corporation</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/stt">STT</a>). The repayment of government money can be viewed as a sign of recovery of the institutions as well as the economy.<br />
<br />
Given the U.S. economy&#8217;s relatively decentralized fiscal structure, Moody&#8217;s considers the federal government debt ratios most relevant to the rating. According to the rating agency, the ratios of general government debt to gross domestic product (GDP) and to revenue are deteriorating sharply, and this trend will continue at least through 2010. After the crisis they are likely to be higher than the ratios of other top credit-rated countries. However, a substantial portion of the deterioration results from asset purchases, which does not have a major impact on the net worth of the federal government.<br />
<br />
According to the agency, the budget deficit will fall to about 4% of output by 2015, improving the ratio of debt to gross domestic product to 77% in 2019, the highest level since World War II.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AIG">Read the full analyst report on "AIG"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=C">Read the full analyst report on "C"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BK">Read the full analyst report on "BK"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=GS">Read the full analyst report on "GS"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=USB">Read the full analyst report on "USB"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AXP">Read the full analyst report on "AXP"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BBT">Read the full analyst report on "BBT"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=STT">Read the full analyst report on "STT"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-confident-about-u-s-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Moody&#8217;s Downgrade Sallie Mae? &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/will-moodys-downgrade-sallie-mae-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/will-moodys-downgrade-sallie-mae-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sallie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLM Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student lender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24201/Will+Moody%27s+Downgrade+Sallie+Mae%3F+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Moody's Investors Service said on Thursday that is thinking about downgrading the long-term ratings of the nation's biggest student lender, <strong>SLM Corp.</strong> or <strong>Sallie Mae</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/SLM">SLM</a>).<br />
 <br />
Previously, on May 13, Moody's cut Sallie Mae's ratings to junk, prompting the student loan provider to call the action "premature". The expected action by the rating agency would affect Sallie Mae's long-term Ba1 (non-investment grade) rating.<br />
 <br />
The agency is considering a possible downgrade as Sallie Mae faces significant uncertainties related to the political and consumer lending environment for student lenders. According to Moody&#8217;s, these issues could challenge the company's liquidity and funding position as it nears large unsecured debt maturities in 2010 and particularly in 2011.<br />
 <br />
The agency also cited that cash flow generation is taking on greater importance in the lender's credit profile because the firm's unsecured debt balance exceeds its unencumbered earning assets.<br />
 <br />
Higher funding costs have added to the negative results for Sallie Mae for the last several quarters. However, we expect funding costs to come down slightly once the federally sponsored programs gather momentum.<br />
 <br />
However, one of the items in President Obama's budget proposals for fiscal 2010 &#8211; the elimination of private lenders from the student-loan market and the shift of the entire system to direct governmental loans in order to eliminate uncertainty for students and save approximately more than $4 billion a year &#8211; is a major concern for Sallie Mae at this point as it will lose the bulk of its business, if the proposal is enacted. The expected action by Moody&#8217;s will further add to the negatives.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=SLM">Read the full analyst report on "SLM"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/will-moodys-downgrade-sallie-mae-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s Reaffirms Compass Ratings &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-reaffirms-compass-ratings-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-reaffirms-compass-ratings-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBVA Compass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guaranty Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[main retail areas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24172/Moody%27s+Reaffirms+Compass+Ratings+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Following the announcement of the acquisition of the failed Guaranty Bank by BBVA Compass, Moody&#8217;s has affirmed its current downgraded ratings on the company. BBVA Compass is a wholly-owned subsidiary of <strong>Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/bbv">BBV</a>).<br />
<br />
Though the rating agency reaffirmed its negative outlook, it said that the acquisition of $12 billion in Guaranty Bank assets will significantly strengthen the bank&#8217;s presence in Texas, which housed 105 Guaranty bank branches. The acquisition would take the bank deeper into Texas and California, accelerating the company&#8217;s strategy to become a regional U.S. bank.<br />
<br />
BBVA Compass will receive an additional investment of $440 million from its parent in the form of common stock as a result of the transaction.<br />
<br />
Currently, the company&#8217;s long-term issuer credit rating is Aa3, and its financial strength rating is B-. The overall outlook on the company is negative.<br />
<br />
The negative outlook mirrors the risks related to the company&#8217;s exposure to consumer loans, mortgages, home equity lines and loans, as well as credit cards. If the economic turmoil worsens further, the company&#8217;s exposure to these loans might lead to losses causing weaker results, which may strain the company&#8217;s capital base.<br />
<br />
Despite having problem loans in its portfolio, last month the group (BBVA) reported a 35% rise in net profit in the second quarter. In addition, the bank has improved its position in all its markets by strengthening relationships with customers. This is borne out by its increased market share of savings and current accounts in the three main retail areas: Spain &#38; Portugal, Mexico and South America.<br />
 <br />
BBVA&#8217;s capital base is sound. Despite the complex economic situatio,n it maintains its capacity to generate capital in an organic and recurrent manner. It is the only one of the 28 big European and American banks that did not need government aid or fresh capital in the crisis.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BBV">Read the full analyst report on "BBV"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-reaffirms-compass-ratings-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s Downgrades Paccar &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-downgrades-paccar-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-downgrades-paccar-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bellevue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class 6-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit ratings agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daimler AG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy truck maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACCAR Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volvo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24001/Moody%27s+Downgrades+Paccar+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded its outlook on <strong>Paccar Inc. </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/pcar">PCAR</a>) and its main financing arm to Negative from Stable, expecting the heavy truck maker to continue to face difficulties due to a slump in truck demand.<br />
<br />
The credit ratings agency has also affirmed its A1 long-term and Prime-1 short-term ratings for Paccar and the financing arm. A1 is an investment-grade rating four notches below the top triple-A rating. Obligations rated A by Moody&#8217;s are considered upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.<br />
<br />
Moody&#8217;s provides Prime-1 rating to taxable securities with maturity not exceeding thirteen months. Short-term ratings are based on the securities ability to honor short-term financial obligations.<br />
<br />
In the second quarter of 2009, Paccar had lost a penny per share, excluding a one-time tax gain. Net revenues slipped 55% driven by a significant fall in volumes on the back of a weak economy. Truck sales declined 37% in the U.S. and Canada and dropped 67% in Europe, where Paccar makes trucks and engines under the DAF brand. For the company's financial-services unit, profit dropped 73% from a year ago and revenue fell 26%.<br />
<br />
Paccar expects truck sales to remain weak in Europe. The company has cut its 2009 estimate for European sales of trucks heavier than 15 metric tons to a range of 150,000 to 180,000 from the previous expected range of 180,000 to 220,000. Given the weak economy, we are apprehensive about Paccar achieving the target.<br />
<br />
Moody's expects the economic downturn to continue to hurt asset quality and returns of Paccar's global financial services operations. It expects Paccar's credit metrics to be very weak this year. However, the agency anticipates truck demand to improve slightly beginning 2010, which should be a respite for truck manufactures.<br />
<br />
Based in Bellevue, Washington, Paccar is the third largest manufacturer of Class 6-8 heavy-duty trucks (with a capacity of more than 15 metric tons) in the world after Volvo and <strong>Daimler AG </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/dai">DAI</a>). We maintain our Neutral recommendation on the stock.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=PCAR">Read the full analyst report on "PCAR"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=DAI">Read the full analyst report on "DAI"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-downgrades-paccar-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s Beats, EPS Est Raised &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-beats-eps-est-raised-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-beats-eps-est-raised-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/23273/Moody%27s+Beats%2C+EPS+Est+Raised+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>Moody&#8217;s</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mco">MCO</a>) reported second quarter revenue of $450.7 million that was above the consensus estimate of $428.9 million. This was, however, down 7.6% from $487.6 million reported in the year-ago quarter.<br />
<br />
Excluding restructuring charges and benefits relating to the resolution of certain legacy tax matters, pro forma EPS of 43 cents was above the Zacks consensus estimate of 39 cents, but down 15.7% from 51 cents per share reported in the year-ago quarter.<br />
 <br />
Excluding certain legacy tax matters and restructuring efforts, the effective tax rate was 38.8% for the second quarter of 2009, compared to 39.6% in the prior-year period. The lower tax rate has boosted EPS.<br />
 <br />
Although results indicate a slight improvement in the credit market as reflected in the broadening of corporate bond issuance from investment grade into high yield, the company was impacted by an unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation. Excluding the foreign currency impact, revenue declined 4.0% year-over-year.<br />
 <br />
Revenue decreased due to a decline in Moody&#8217;s Investor Services (MIS) revenue, which fell 12.8% year-over-year. Structured Finance revenue also decreased due to limited new issuance in commercial and residential mortgage-backed securities. Moody&#8217;s Analytics (MA) revenue grew 6.5%, as the Software businesses grew 83.2% year over year, with flat Subscriptions and Professional Services revenue.<br />
<br />
As a result of international diversification, international revenue was down only 4.7% year over year in the quarter compared to a 10.0% decline in U.S. revenue.<br />
<br />
Excluding restructuring charges, operating expenses rose 2.5% from the prior-year period, resulting in an operating margin of 42.2% versus 47.9% in the year-ago quarter. The decrease in margin was due to the decline in revenue and increase in expenses.<br />
<br />
Moody&#8217;s remained cautious about its 2009 results, but raised its full year EPS guidance to $1.45-$1.55 from its previous outlook of $1.40-$1.50 due to better-than-expected first-half results. Although the full-year profit outlook was raised, it fell short of analyst estimates.<br />
<br />
Consequently, we expect weakness to linger in the second half of 2009. Revenue is expected to decline in the mid single-digit percentage range with no significant improvement until later in the year. The MIS business is expected to decline in the high single-digit percentage range, while Moody&#8217;s Analytics is expected to grow in the low single-digit percentage range. Operating expenses are expected to increase in the mid-single-digit percentage range, leading to an operating margin of mid to high-thirties percentage range.<br />
<br />
Although the economy is showing signs of revival, we remain cautious about the recovery in the debt market in 2009, and expect a slow recovery in the company&#8217;s results as it faces a tempered credit environment. We maintain a neutral stance on the stock.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MCO">Read the full analyst report on "MCO"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-beats-eps-est-raised-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ambac&#8217;s Capital Levels Concerning &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/ambacs-capital-levels-concerning-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/ambacs-capital-levels-concerning-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ambac Assurance Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambac financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everspan Financial Guarantee Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer MBIA Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard and Poor's Ratings Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin State Insurance Commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/23140/Ambac%27s+Capital+Levels+Concerning+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Last week, <strong>Ambac Financial Group</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ABK">ABK</a>) announced that its chief operating unit Ambac Assurance expects to report estimated impairment losses on credit derivatives of $4.9 million. This will be an increase of $1.6 billion during the quarter. The expected write downs on the credit derivatives portfolio is a result of falling values of underlying collateral within the collateralized debt obligations of asset-backed securities.
<p align="left">The unit will also incur about $800 million in statutory loss and loss expenses in the period. The statutory loss and loss expenses relate primarily to deterioration in Ambac Assurance&#8217;s second-lien and Alt-A mortgage-backed securities financial guarantee portfolios. The impairment loss is expected to reduce Ambac's statutory capital and surplus.</p>
<p align="left">At the end of March, Ambac Assurance had $372.8 million in statutory capital and surplus. With $1.6 billion in extra impairments from the second quarter, the unit would have negative statutory capital and surplus of more than $1 billion.</p>
<p align="left">Ambac Assurance has appealed to the Wisconsin State Insurance Commissioner to discharge a substantial part of its contingency reserves, which totaled $1.95 billion at the end of March. That would replenish the unit's statutory capital and surplus. However, there is uncertainty about the release of funds.</p>
<p align="left">To conserve cash, Ambac intends to stop paying interest on its directly issued subordinated capital securities on Aug, 1. Ambac Assurance will stop paying monthly dividends on the unit's auction market preferred shares on Aug. 1.</p>
<p align="left">Following Ambac&#8217;s potential loss announcement, S&#38;P downgraded Ambac and its insurance unit to deeply speculative grade. The rating agency is concerned about the company&#8217;s deteriorating capital levels. The losses are expected to eat into Ambac&#8217;s capital, causing it to fall below the minimum requisite levels.</p>
<p align="left">S&#38;P cut Ambac Assurance multiple notches to CC from BBB. It also lowered the counterparty Ambac Financial&#8217;s credit rating to CC from BB. CC is the most speculative non-investment grade rating. Ratings of BB or lower are junk. The ratings were removed from review for a further downgrade and the outlook is negative.</p>
<p align="left">Moody&#8217;s also made a similar move by downgrading Ambac Assurance Corp by five notches to Caa2, eight steps below investment grade and a deeply speculative rating. Moody's also cut Ambac Financial's ratings by three notches to Ca, ten steps below investment grade.</p>
<p align="left">Last month, Ambac deferred the launch of Everspan Financial Guarantee Corp., a new bond insurance unit, as it was unable to garner sufficient capital.</p>
<p align="left">Peer <strong>MBIA Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MBI">MBI</a>) has also seen several rating downgrades losing its &#8220;triple A" rating, since the onset of sub-prime mortgage crisis.</p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=ABK">Read the full analyst report on "ABK"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MBI">Read the full analyst report on "MBI"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/ambacs-capital-levels-concerning-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company News for July 29, 2009 &#8211; Corporate Summary</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-july-29-2009-corporate-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-july-29-2009-corporate-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arcelormittal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet-search alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medco Health Solutions;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYSE:MT;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qwest communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Nextel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Textron;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/22930/Company+News+for+July+29%2C+2009+-+Corporate+Summary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">&#8226; Media reports say Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) and Yahoo (NASDAQ:YHOO) have struck a revenue-sharing deal that could be finalized today.  The internet-search alliance could see a fierce competition with rival Google (NASDAQ:GOOG), the reports say</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Time Warner (NYSE:TWX) reported second quarter adjusted earnings 45 cents a share, ahead of consensus estimates of 37 cents a share, on revenues of $6.81 billion, versus estimates of $6.97 billion. The firm maintained its 2009 earnings guidance of flat adjusted results from continuing operations versus $1.98 a year ago</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Moody's (NYSE:MCO) second quarter earnings exceeded estimates by 3 cents at 43 cents as revenues fell 7.6% to $451 million</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Medco Health Solutions (NYSE:MHS) reported second quarter earnings of 69 cents, 4 cents ahead of estimates</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Qwest Communications (NYSE:Q) reported earnings of 13 cents, 3 pennies above estimates, on in-line revenues of $3.1 billion, that was off 9% from a year ago</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Textron (NYSE:TXT) reported second earnings of 8 cents ex-items, 11 cents above Street estimates of a loss as revenues fell 29.1% to $2.61 billion. The firm said it now sees full-year earnings of 33 cents to 63 cents a share, compared with its prior view of 45 cents to 75 cents a share and ahead of consensus estimates of 22 cents</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; General Dynamics (NYSE:GD) reported earnings of $1.60, topping estimates of $1.57 and upped its guidance for the full year by a nickel to $6.05-$6.15</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; Sprint Nextel (NYSE:S) reported a second-quarter loss of 13 cents a share, an 11-cent miss, on in-line revenues, down 10%, to $8.1 billion</p>
<p align="justify">&#8226; ArcelorMittal (NYSE:MT) reported a 57 cent per share, or $792 million, second quarter loss versus $4.19 a year ago and estimates of a $336 million profit, as revenues fell 60% to $15.18 billion from $37.84 billion</p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-july-29-2009-corporate-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reforming Financial Regulations &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/reforming-financial-regulations-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/reforming-financial-regulations-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice Rivlin;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank lobby;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Products Safety Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Safety Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fdic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Financial Services Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Premiums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large banks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zandi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plain vanilla financial products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plain vanilla mortgage products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/22603/Reforming+Financial+Regulations+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While most of the attention yesterday was focused on Ben Bernanke's testimony before the House Financial Services Committee (not much new came out in that one, Ben says the recovery will be anemic, inflation will not be a problem and the Fed has a plan to drain the liquidity before it causes problems), the same committee held another hearing in the afternoon focused on the reform of the financial regulatory structure. Among the witnesses were Alice Rivlin, the former #2 at the Fed in the 1990's, Mark Zandi of Moody's Economics and Simon Johnson, the former chief economist at the IMF. <br />
<br />
Among the key points that came out of it were that there were 2 basic approaches to preventing the need for future bailouts. One focused on better regulation particularly of those who are too big to fail, and the other is to make sure that institutions don't become too big to fail (TBTF). The Obama administration proposes to go down the first path. <br />
<br />
It would be very hard at this point to unscramble the egg and reinstitute a version of Glass Stiegel. After all, one of the ways we dealt with the problem was going in exactly the other direction, with <strong>JPMorgan Chase</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/jpm">JPM</a>) taking over the remnants of Bear Stearns and <strong>Bank of America</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BAC">BAC</a>) swallowing Merrill Lynch. There was general agreement that making the list of those institutions that are TBTF public would be a mistake. Those banks would have an implicit backing of the federal government, which would give them a very big competitive advantage by lowering their cost of capital. However, even if the list were kept secret, the market would pretty quickly figure out who was on the list (with a few big but not gigantic institutions left as question marks).<br />
<br />
Since the best way to get big in a hurry is to take outsized risks, this approach could actually worsen the moral hazard problems and make future problems more likely rather than less likely. The odds are that the banks would move more quickly than the regulators (or simply capture them) and if the incentives are there where any winnings are kept private while the losses are borne by the taxpayers, the banks will head off to Vegas every time. <br />
<br />
One solution would be to have the capital requirements on a sliding scale. Thus the bigger a bank is the higher the percentage of its capital that would have to be held in reserve, and that the FDIC insurance premiums would also reflect the higher systemic risk that very large banks pose. This is a very good idea. It would give banks an incentive not to get too big. If they were successful and grew, they could always spin off divisions to their shareholders to make themselves smaller, and thus have lower capital requirements. <br />
<br />
There was disagreement over the Fed being the best agency to serve as the systemic risk regulator. Clearly it did not cover itself in glory as a regulator in the lead up to the financial crisis (there monetary policy reactions to the crisis on the other hand were excellent). However, there are no clearly better placed alternatives and they already do have some regulatory functions.  Assigning it to a committee of different agencies would be a recipe for disaster, with no clear lines of responsibility. Some expressed concern that it could lessen the perceived independence of the Fed, but I do not see why that would have to be the case.<br />
<br />
Most of the participants strongly endorsed the idea of a financial Consumer Products Safety Commission. I whole heartedly agree. It, however, is likely to be fought tooth and nail by the bank lobby. To my mind, that is proof enough that it is desperately needed. <br />
<br />
The existing regulatory structure has been a dismal failure at protecting the consumer from abusive mortgage and credit card contracts (go ahead and pull out your credit card contract, I defy any reader to understand what it says, with the possible exception of a lawyer who specializes in that area). <br />
<br />
Protecting the consumer will always be an afterthought at agencies like the Fed. The top officials, and brains, there are going to be focused on monetary policy, not on making sure that plain vanilla mortgage products are available at all institutions that offer mortgages. Standardization of plain vanilla financial products would also help the smaller banks since it costs a lot of money to write 35 pages of fine print legalize, which a big bank can spread over millions of customers, but a small community bank could not hope to do. <br />
<br />
While this seems like a technical and complicated issue, it is important to keep the heat on congressmen and senators to make sure that the Consumer Safety Commission comes into existence, otherwise the lobbyists will kill it in its crib. <br />
<br />
After all, even after Sinclair published "The Jungle", the meat packing industry fought for the right to sell rancid meat to consumers. You can bet the banks will fight for the right to sell rancid mortgages a century later. They will claim that it will kill off innovation, but really, how much benefit have we gotten from innovations like option-ARMs and exploding subprime loans than get packaged into CDO squared? Wall Street reaped massive bonuses from those innovations, but could someone please explain to me just how an ordinary consumer benefited?<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/reforming-financial-regulations-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To The Finland Station And Back Again</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/to-the-finland-station-and-back-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/to-the-finland-station-and-back-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank credit fundamentals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank support package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon PowerShot S400 / IXUS 400 Digital Camera;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical industry new orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claus Vistesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commission of European Communities;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit rating agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danske Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance ministry forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finnish government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finnish Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finnish Statistics Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finnvera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global economy matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helsinki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HICP;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jorgen Elmeskov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monthly gross domestic product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oecd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partial financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pohjola Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime Minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[producer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail trade sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romain Duval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung 400PX 40 in. HDTV-Ready LCD TV;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialised state-owned finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics Finland building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanhanen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-6253074658246427134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: Barcelonabr /br /This post accompanies my recent piece on Sweden. I have been scratching my head and  trying to see what could be learnt from making a comparison between Finland and Sweden. Some of the differences are obvious - one is in the euro, and the other isn't, once can adjust monetary policy and currency values, and the other can't. Others are less so. Finland's goods trade surplus has been declining steadily since joining EMU while Sweden's has remained relatively constant. And Swedish males live on average three years longer than their Finnish counterparts. So what is important here, and why? And if convergence theory has anything positive to be said for it, shouldn't we be able to observe so sort of convergence going on here.br /br /br /First, and just to remind ourselves, here is the chart from Claus Vistesen which shows what the relation between population ageing and current account balance might look like. The key point is that as populations age beyond a certain point, a tendency to run a current account surplus emerges, as domestic demand steadily weakens, and becomes insufficient to drive growth. Evidence for this phenomenon can be found in Germany, Japan and Sweden.br /br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlMSCXRnOaI/AAAAAAAAOhs/0ENVvdtHpMA/s1600-h/claus+model.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 190px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5355644213690579362" border="0" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlMSCXRnOaI/AAAAAAAAOhs/0ENVvdtHpMA/s400/claus+model.png" //abr /br /The idea is that as median population age rises the current account dynamics of a country change. The last ageing phase shown to the right of the diagram is purely speculative at this point, although theory suggests that if the underlying momentum of ageing is left unaddressed it may well be what happens. But it is a development which is to be strongly avoided since although we do not yet know what happens when a society starts to dis-save at an advanced median age, the longer we can put off finding out, the better. p/ppWhich is why looking at Finland is important, since unlike the three aforementioned "ideal type" agers, Finland has in fact seen a deterioration in its external position over the last decade, and even though it has, up to now, remained a surplus country, the trend is certainly towards deficit, and this trend needs to be halted and reversed. Indeed this is the most pressing policy problem facing the Finnish authorities during the current recession.br /br /br /Now, as in Finland, Sweden's external position underwent a structural shift in the mid 1990s, just as Claus's model predicts. First positive balance - the submarine breaks water - in 1994, meadian age 38.4 (quite young in international comparisons so interesting). So so far so good.br /br //ppa href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlMTH16o8xI/AAAAAAAAOh0/t_tPM89ZNeU/s1600-h/sweden+CA+balance.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 232px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5355645407326696210" border="0" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlMTH16o8xI/AAAAAAAAOh0/t_tPM89ZNeU/s400/sweden+CA+balance.png" //abr /br /So Sweden is a sort of normal case, now let's look at Finland. Once more the mid 1990s "transition" is clear. Finland moves from deficit to surplus. But unlike the Swedish case the surplus peaks around the turn of the century, and since then has been steadily weakening.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleFZf-Qf8I/AAAAAAAAOj8/s3uL4qSA1NA/s1600-h/finland+CA+balance.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 202px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356896954906345410" border="0" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleFZf-Qf8I/AAAAAAAAOj8/s3uL4qSA1NA/s400/finland+CA+balance.png" //abr /br /There can be a number of explanations for this. The pattern of ageing could, for example, be different in Finland. Or the euro might be a factor, with the loss of control over monetary policy leading to a steady deterioration in the level of international competitiveness. As we will see below, some part of the explanation may be provided by each of these, but first, lets take a look as some of the empirical aspects of Finland's present recession, since it is evident that Finland, like many other countries, has entered a strong recession on the current back the global crisis. br /br /strongStrong Decline In Finland's GDP/strongbr /br /In the first three months of this year GDP was down by 2.7% when compared with the last three months of last year (an 11.2% annualised rate of contraction).br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleRyBM2YqI/AAAAAAAAOkM/_-6npDRFPUU/s1600-h/finland+GDP+2.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 203px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356910570282312354" border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleRyBM2YqI/AAAAAAAAOkM/_-6npDRFPUU/s400/finland+GDP+2.png" //a And it was down by 7.5% when compared with the first quarter of 2008 (Eurostat data).br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleRrNlzMFI/AAAAAAAAOkE/GbzBEZebYiI/s1600-h/finland+gdp+one.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 203px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356910453349101650" border="0" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleRrNlzMFI/AAAAAAAAOkE/GbzBEZebYiI/s400/finland+gdp+one.png" //abr /br /br /One significant difference which can already be noted between Sweden and Finland is that while the last three months of 2008 were definitely much worse than the first three months of 2009 in Swedan, in Finland, as in many other Eurozone economies, Q1 2009 was definitely much worse than Q4 2008. And indeed, while Sweden's economy shows some definite signs of small green shoots in Q2 2009, as far as we can see, Finland's economy still remains deeply mired in recession. Finland does not have a local variant of the ubiquitous Purchasing Managers Surveys, but the statistics office does maintain a monthly gross domestic product (GDP) indicator. Now, while the methodology is very different (the PMI composites are survey based and qualitative, and much more reliable) for what it is worth Finland's GDP indicator fell 9.2 percent in April in comparison with April 2008, that is to say, the year on year contraction was greater than in the first quarter, but it is difficult to draw any definitive conclusion from this, since there are many statistical factors at work here.br /br /According to Statistics Finland building and manufacturing industry were the hardest hit.br /br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleSGLHN4lI/AAAAAAAAOkU/iqk_UXBLuOQ/s1600-h/finland+GDP+indicator.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 220px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356910916540424786" border="0" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleSGLHN4lI/AAAAAAAAOkU/iqk_UXBLuOQ/s400/finland+GDP+indicator.png" //abr /br /The April data showed production in construction and manufacturing - both key contributors to the Finnish economy - down around 17 percent year-on-year. Production in April was down 0.6 percent from March. Output in agriculture and forestry showed slight growth on an annual basis of just below two percent, while services fell six percent.br /br /And the outlook for the rest of this year does not look much brighter. The OECD forecasts growth in the Finnish economy will fall by 4.7 percent in 2009 with a return to 0.8 percent growth next year. Significantly the OECD also stressed that uncertainty in the evolution of international trade poses the greatest risk in the outlook for the Finnish economy.br /br /The IMF currently expects the economy to shrink by 5.2 percent this year and again by 1.2 percent next year, while the latest finance ministry forecast is for a 6.0 percent shrinkage this year followed by 0.3 percent growth next year. All the 2009 forecasts seem to be subject to downside risk, while the 2010 ones are no better than guesses, since the level of uncertainty is so high, and Finland is so dependent on external trade, but further contraction seems more probable than growth at this point./ppbr /strongShort Term Indicators/strongbr /br /Industrial output fell again in May (year on year) for the seventh consecutive month, and was down by 23.2 percent over May 2008. This follows a revised fall of 21.3 in April.br /br /br /br //ppa href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Slej6XoJ9QI/AAAAAAAAOlk/rB4_suQB6EM/s1600-h/finland+IP+one.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 233px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356930504950674690" border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Slej6XoJ9QI/AAAAAAAAOlk/rB4_suQB6EM/s400/finland+IP+one.png" //abr /br /Month-on-month, industrial production also fell - by 2.2 percent from April when it fell by 3.8 percent over March. So the industrial situation is deteriorating, not improving at this point. Output fell in all main sectors, with metal industry reporting the biggest decline around 28 percent, while the paper industry production also shrank by nearly 28 percent year-on-year.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlekAuJTFcI/AAAAAAAAOls/QFbpolPVU9g/s1600-h/finland+IP+two.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 230px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356930614074480066" border="0" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlekAuJTFcI/AAAAAAAAOls/QFbpolPVU9g/s400/finland+IP+two.png" //abr /br /Over the January to May period, industrial output decreased by close on 22 per cent from the corresponding period in the previous year. And there seems to be little improvement on the horizon. According to Statistics Finland, the value of new orders in manufacturing was 39.6 per cent lower in May 2009 than in May 2008, slightly above the January to May average decrease of 38.9 per cent year-on-year.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlhIYF5xH3I/AAAAAAAAOmM/gwv9TvECAPY/s1600-h/finland+new+orders.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 223px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5357111335495737202" border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlhIYF5xH3I/AAAAAAAAOmM/gwv9TvECAPY/s400/finland+new+orders.png" //abr /br /As in earlier months, the decline in new orders was strongest in the metal industry (47.5 per cent). In the chemical industry new orders fell by 30.7 per cent, in the textile industry by 28.5 per cent and in the manufacture of paper, and paper and board products by 19.4 per cent.br /br /Construction activity is also well down, falling by 14.4% year on year in March (the latest detailed data we have), and by around 17% in April according to the GDP indicator.br /br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleXNKdAa-I/AAAAAAAAOkc/OjHPFOr1FSc/s1600-h/finland+construction+one.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 232px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356916534180604898" border="0" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleXNKdAa-I/AAAAAAAAOkc/OjHPFOr1FSc/s400/finland+construction+one.png" //abr /br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleXUucI7yI/AAAAAAAAOkk/vJWxuqPZrRs/s1600-h/finland+construction+two.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 230px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356916664099729186" border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleXUucI7yI/AAAAAAAAOkk/vJWxuqPZrRs/s400/finland+construction+two.png" //abr /br /Finland did not have a massive construction boom. The construction of new dwellings shows no obvious surge in the first decade of the century.br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlhToOeCtjI/AAAAAAAAOmU/iLNXI3GyOOU/s1600-h/finland+completed+dwellings.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 203px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5357123707301180978" border="0" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlhToOeCtjI/AAAAAAAAOmU/iLNXI3GyOOU/s400/finland+completed+dwellings.png" //abr /br /On the other hand rate of household indebtedness is up, with the ratio of debt to disposable income rising to 101.4 percent in 2007, from 70.3 percent in 2002. Significantly, the rate of indebtedness among households composed of persons in the key 25 to 34 age range reached 189 percent in 2007. House prices seem to be a story of one long steady march upwards since 1995, but prices did start to fall in 2008, and this trend now seems set to continue.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlhlgK9MxLI/AAAAAAAAOmc/BbpjfpDqrns/s1600-h/finland+falt+prices.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 201px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5357143360128468146" border="0" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlhlgK9MxLI/AAAAAAAAOmc/BbpjfpDqrns/s400/finland+falt+prices.png" //abr /br /Retail sales, which give us a measure of domestic demand, are also falling, if still only moderately. According to Eurostat, retail trade sales fell by 2.99 percent year on year in April. According to the Finnish Statistics Office, sales between January-April were down by 1.6 percent over a year earlier. During the same time period, motor vehicle trade sales were down 31.8 percent and wholesale trade sales down 17.5 percent.br /br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlemDngqsOI/AAAAAAAAOl8/7C0oGNnYqFk/s1600-h/finland+retail+sales+two.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 229px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356932862856311010" border="0" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlemDngqsOI/AAAAAAAAOl8/7C0oGNnYqFk/s400/finland+retail+sales+two.png" //abr /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlelzyUj7PI/AAAAAAAAOl0/SlBmc_ie5O4/s1600-h/finland+retail+sales+one.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 230px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356932590880419058" border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlelzyUj7PI/AAAAAAAAOl0/SlBmc_ie5O4/s400/finland+retail+sales+one.png" //abr /br /Finland's unemployment rate continues to rise, and at an accelerating pace. The increase in those unemployed from April to May alone was greater than that in the whole of last autumn, according to Statistics Finland. From January to May the seasonally adjusted jobless rate was up by two percent and there were more than 300,000 people recorded as without work in May, 60,000 more than in May 2008, taking the national unemployment rate as measured by Finland Statistics to 10.9 percent.br /br /Using the EU (ILO compatible) methodology, Eurostat report the May unemployment rate as 8.1 percent. The OECD expect unemployment to continue to rise in Finland, and forecast an unemployment rate of 8.7 percent this year, rising to 10.8 percent next year (ILO methodology).br /br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlenmfBj7zI/AAAAAAAAOmE/yMRmZ6ZW-vo/s1600-h/finland+unemployment+rate.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 232px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356934561385410354" border="0" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SlenmfBj7zI/AAAAAAAAOmE/yMRmZ6ZW-vo/s400/finland+unemployment+rate.png" //abr /br /br /The OECD is also worried about employment in Finland in the longer term, and point out that while the country has taken important steps to remove the barriers to employment of older workers (see a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/9/0,3343,en_2649_34747_28023113_1_1_1_1,00.html"the OECD publication Ageing and Employment Policies in Finland/a) more needs to be done. Since the early 1990s, Finland has introduced programmes to support the employment of older workers, notably the National Programme on Ageing Workers. It has also recently undertaken a major reform of the old-age pension system and will phase out early retirement schemes.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleYcpAUieI/AAAAAAAAOk8/NG9R-FRUCsc/s1600-h/finland+median+age.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 230px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356917899591453154" border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleYcpAUieI/AAAAAAAAOk8/NG9R-FRUCsc/s400/finland+median+age.png" //abr /br /However, Finland’s median age is rising steadily (see chart above) and the old-age dependency ratio (population aged 65 and over as a proportion of the population aged 20-64) is projected to increase from 25% in 2000 to 43% in 2025 compared with an OECD average of 22% in 2000 and 33% in 2025. This is a very steep rise, and raising employment rates among the older population is going to be the key to meeting the challenges presented by the need to find export lead growth.br /br /According to the OECD, only around 30% of people aged 61 are currently working – a drop of more than 50 percentage points compared with 51 year olds. This steep drop in employment rates can primarily be explained by the fact that Finland has too many pathways to early retirement, notably unemployment benefits, unemployment pension, disability pension and individual early retirement pension. Already at the age of 50, 18% of individuals are receiving either unemployment or disability benefits, increasing to more than 46% by the age of 60. Moreover, in the age group 60-64 most unemployed persons transfer to the unemployment pension with a further 20% relying on disability benefits and about 10% rely on the individual early retirement pension.br /br /br /strongDeflation dynamics/strongbr /br /br /Like Sweden, the inflation data also throws into the limelight the disparity between the EU HICP measure (which does not include housing interest) and the national CPI (which does). Year-on-year inflation, calculated by Statistics Finland dropped to 0.0 per cent in May, while in April it was still 0.8 per cent. According to Statistics Finland the drop was primarily due a fall in food prices and interest rates. Between April and May, consumer prices fell by 0.2 per cent. On the EU HICP index, however, year on year inflation is currently running at 1.5 percent. Thus, in a time of falling house prices and lowered interest rates, the HICP totally underestimates the deflation danger.br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleeGZNLsrI/AAAAAAAAOlc/aq-vhpTdqUI/s1600-h/finland+CPI.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 230px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356924114463077042" border="0" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleeGZNLsrI/AAAAAAAAOlc/aq-vhpTdqUI/s400/finland+CPI.png" //abr /br /It is important to remember here that two-thirds of Finland’s housing stock consists of owner-occupied homes, and home ownership is widespread in all forms of housing, including apartments as well as detached houses and row houses. Normally falling interest rates would produce rising house values, due to the affordability effect, but under current conditions we are observing the opposite. I can't help feeling that European monetary policymakers need to think more about this type of thing.br /br /br /More evidence for deflationary headwinds is offered by producer prices for manufactured products, which fell by 8.1 per cent year on year in May. Export prices were down 9.8 per cent and import prices fell by 11.7 per cent. The year-on-year change in the wholesale price index was -8.9 per cent.br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SledXbFfrVI/AAAAAAAAOlU/4OlIOIVaSfc/s1600-h/finland+ppi+one.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 232px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356923307513851218" border="0" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SledXbFfrVI/AAAAAAAAOlU/4OlIOIVaSfc/s400/finland+ppi+one.png" //abr /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SledR64EbDI/AAAAAAAAOlM/ZtxRqmJARKI/s1600-h/finland+ppi+one.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 232px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356923212968258610" border="0" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SledR64EbDI/AAAAAAAAOlM/ZtxRqmJARKI/s400/finland+ppi+one.png" //abr /br /strongSo Where Are We?/strongbr /br /br /Finland's economy faces important challanges in both the short and long terms. Finland's state debt is low at the present time, which gives the capacity for short term stimulus and bank bailouts. But it is rising, and reached a record high of 70.6 billion euros by the end of the first quarter of 2009. General government debt, calculated according to Eurostat methodology, grew by 7.5 billion euros in January-March, and reached 38 percent of 2008 gross domestic product (GDP). Still, there is plenty of stimulus ammunition left, the important thing is to use it wisely, and try to engineer an economic transition.br /br /br /br /The severe contraction in the Finnish economy is also likely to take its toll on bank credit fundamentals, according to the credit rating agency Moody's. The agency recently reaffirmed its negative outlook for the Finnish banking system. Up until now the Finnish banking sector - lead by Pohjola Bank and local branches of Nordea and Danske Bank - appear to have been weathering the storm without undue difficulty due to minimal exposure to toxic assets and a focus on traditional banking activities, according to Moody's. However:br /br /br /"Given that the crisis on financial markets has now spread extensively into the real economy, Moody's expects Finnish banks to be adversely affected," according to the latest report. Moody's said an increase in bankruptcies was indicative of the weakened credit environment.br /br /Corporate bankruptcies increased 33 percent in January-May from a year ago, according to Statistics Finland.br /br /br /The Finnish government has already approved one supplementary budget for 2009 including a special stimulus package. The overall impact is estimated at around €2 billion (although new spending is estimated at only €1.2 billion), and includes about €140 million in transport infrastructure projects. The government has committed itself to implementing a guaranteed pension from the beginning of March 2011. This will cost around €111 million a year, and will raise the lowest pensions by about €100 a month - affecting about 120,000 people.br /br /There have also been a number of measures aimed directly at helping corporate finance. The government now offers banks operating in Finland both deposit guarantees and capital, and will also invest its pension funds in corporate bonds, offer companies financial support through the specialised state-owned finance company, Finnvera, and provide partial financing for the construction of thousands of new homes through the state-owned credit institution Kuntarahoitus (Municipal  Finance).br /br /Overall, the government has pledged about €60 billion in guarantees, loans and investments, and is expecting a boost of €45 billion in corporate financing. Prime Minister Vanhanen described the decisions as ‘massive, even gigantic’. The largest sums of money are in the bank support package, which aims to secure the continuity of corporate credit. In fact, the Finnish parliament has already approved guarantees of €40 billion to help banks to raise capital.br /br /br /But in the longer term the issues raised at the start of this post need to be addressed. Competitiveness needs to be restored to the Finnish economy, and exports boosted, as illustrated by the REER chart below. In particular the situation pre 2007 needs to be restored. The change is not massive (maybe only 5% or so), so it is doable, and it needs to be done, especially since the Swedish Krona has been significantly devalued.br /br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleYhK9j5yI/AAAAAAAAOlE/ABWBRXo1X2w/s1600-h/finland+REER.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 203px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356917977426159394" border="0" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleYhK9j5yI/AAAAAAAAOlE/ABWBRXo1X2w/s400/finland+REER.png" //abr /br /As mentioned previously, the goods trade balance has been deteriorating, and the earlier positive balance now needs to be restored.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleYT6YC0NI/AAAAAAAAOks/DIqtYsokRx8/s1600-h/finland+goods+balance.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 233px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356917749635535058" border="0" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleYT6YC0NI/AAAAAAAAOks/DIqtYsokRx8/s400/finland+goods+balance.png" //abr /br /One of the things that stands out is Finland's differential preformance vis a vis Sweden. Using data prepared by Eurostat which shows the volume indexes of strongGDP per capita/strong as expressed in Purchasing Power Standards (PPS) (with the European Union - EU-27 - average set at 100) it is apparent that a gap exists (see below) and that it is not being closed. In fact, after 1998 the two lines move tantalisingly in tandem, but with Finnish per capital GDP stuck just short of the Swedish level. Any reading on these indexes of over 100 implies that the country's level of GDP per head is higher than the EU average and vice versa, and relative movements in the indexes imply that the rates of change in GDP per capita are either improving more or less rapidly than the EU average. The basic data behind the charts is expressed in PPS which effectively become a common currency eliminating differences in price levels between countries making possible meaningful volume comparisons of relative GDP per capita. Since the index is calculated using PPS figures and expressed with respect to EU27 = 100, it is only valid for cross-country comparison purposes and not for individual country inter-temporal comparisons, nonetheless charts based on such data are extraordinarily revealing.br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sli5_RB6ZOI/AAAAAAAAOoI/5-x-QudwTg8/s1600-h/finland+gdp+per+capita.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 202px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sli5_RB6ZOI/AAAAAAAAOoI/5-x-QudwTg8/s400/finland+gdp+per+capita.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5357236253311526114" //abr /br /So the real reason is why (given some sort of loose convergence expectation) this gap is not being closed. There can be several explanations. One may be differences in institutional quality (education systems, for example), another might be the impact of euro membership: it could be, for example, that, as OECD economists Jorgen Elmeskov and Romain Duval argued in a suggestive paper (a href="http://www.ecb.int/events/pdf/conferences/emu/sessionIV_Elmeskov_Duval_Handout.pdf"Structural reforms in product and labour markets/a) presented at the 2005 ECB conference "What effects is EMU having on the euro area and its member countries?", that membership has up to now slowed down rather than accelerating the reform process. Thirdly, the issue could be differential demographics. Few economists seem willing to investigate this possibility in any depth, despite mounting evidence that it may be important. /ppOne demographic indicator that springs to mind immediately when I think about these two countries is the differential in life expectancy. Swedish males live on average around 3 years longer than Finnish males (see below). Now this may be important, although no one has started to calibrate this effect yet. The economic intuition for the importance would be, think of investment in a machine (physical capital), then obviously the value of the investment is greater (other things being equal) if the machine keeps running five years longer. br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SljmWSWJ5tI/AAAAAAAAOoY/W3cxkKuwyjQ/s1600-h/finaland+exit+from+labour+force.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 205px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SljmWSWJ5tI/AAAAAAAAOoY/W3cxkKuwyjQ/s400/finaland+exit+from+labour+force.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5357285027313477330" //abr /br /Things cannot be that much different with human capital. The education and on the job training costs are similar, but the person is able to work three years less. Is it mere coincidence that labour market exit at 61 is so typical if the health outlook is worse? Here are the relative labour force participation rates for me between 55 and 65. It is my contention that this alone accounts for a substantial part of the GDP per capita difference between the two countries. br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sli_SXbm9PI/AAAAAAAAOoQ/xHW5qWedioE/s1600-h/finland+55+participation+rate.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 203px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sli_SXbm9PI/AAAAAAAAOoQ/xHW5qWedioE/s400/finland+55+participation+rate.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5357242079005570290" //abr /br /But the solution to this problem is not an easy one, and the OECD and others really need to think much more seriously about this phenomenon when they indisciminately propose raising higher-age participation rates across the board as a solution to the declining workforces problem./ppWhat is involved here is a complex mix of health provision, lifestyle and genetic differences, and any response needs to take account of all of these. br /br //pa href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleYXq0bsEI/AAAAAAAAOk0/8GejKUSpKc8/s1600-h/finland+life+expectancy.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 202px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5356917814179115074" border="0" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SleYXq0bsEI/AAAAAAAAOk0/8GejKUSpKc8/s400/finland+life+expectancy.png" //abr /br /Raising the health and life expectancy of the Finnish population would be one sure way to raising GDP per capita, another way (in the longer term) would be raising fertility back up to replacement levels, and a third path would be extending the younger labour force by encouraging immigration  (which interestingly has been a href="http://www.helsinkitimes.fi/htimes/domestic-news/general/7019-immigration-to-finland-at-record-levels.html"on the rise in the Helsinki area in recent months/a, although if many of the newcomers simply arrive from equally affected Estonia this is nothing more than moving the deckchairs around). Whichever way you look at it though, in both the short and longer term the deterioration in Finland's trade surplus needs to be addressed. If it isn't the outcome will not be a pleasant sight.div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8991369883287712098-6253074658246427134?l=globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/to-the-finland-station-and-back-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Market News for July 7, 2009 &#8211; Market News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-july-7-2009-market-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-july-7-2009-market-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America/Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of NY Mellon;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BenQ DC P500 Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Suisse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dupont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxim Integrated Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile telephone contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Semiconductor;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york stock exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil And Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proctor & Gamble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Nextel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology shares;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21869/Stock+Market+News+for+July+7%2C+2009+-+Market+News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">US stocks pared early losses to end the day mixed as a fall in commodities and oil prices worried investors, but a late rally in some blue chips sent conflicting signs about the strength of an economic recovery.  Mood was cautious on the Street Monday as markets looked for fresh direction ahead of the second-quarter earnings which begin this week.  </p>
<p align="justify">The Dow Jones industrial average rose 44.13 points, or 0.5%, to 8,324.87, and the broader Standard &#38; Poor's 500 index edged up 2.30 points, or 0.3%, to 898.72. The technology-laden Nasdaq declined 9.12 points, or 0.5%, to 1,787.40.  Among DJIA components, 19 closed higher while six of the ten S&#38;P 500 industry groups advanced.  On the New York Stock Exchange, declining issues beat advancing ones by a three-to-two margin. </p>
<p align="justify">Among DJIA components, American Express (NYSE:AXP), up 5.6% and Merck (NYSE:MRK), up 3.3% led on the upside.  American Express gained after Stifel Nicolaus upgraded its rating on the firm (NYSE:AXP), noting the company the best positioned of credit-card issuers to endure the regulatory changes, advising as well that worries of bad debt are easing.  Dupont (NYSE:DD) shares added 2.2% and Proctor &#38; Gamble (NYSE:PG) gained 2.1% on their safety play appeal.  However, as commodities declined, Alcoa (NYSE:AA) slid 6.1% ahead of its quarterly post after the markets closed Wednesday.</p>
<p align="justify">Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) shares declined 3.9% following a Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS) report that warned of worse-than-expected loan losses likely impacting the company's second-quarter results. Nevertheless, financials rose 1% with Bank of NY Mellon (NYSE:BK) adding 2.9%, Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) gaining 2.1% and JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM) rising 1% on news that Moody's (NYSE:MCO) may lift its rating on Brazil debt, lowering banks' exposure risk.  FedEx (NYSE:FDX) gained 3.2% to $56.04 after head of the company's international business said he saw signs of an economic rebound in the second half of the year.</p>
<p align="justify">Amid lingering worries about the pace of an economic recovery, commodity and material issues proved to be a drag as crude prices plunged to a five-week low of $64.05 after hitting an eight-month high of above $73 per barrel last week.  Among the ten S&#38;P500 industry groupings, basic material shares fell 1.9% and oil and gas declined 1.3%. Technology shares eased 0.5%, as Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) fell 1.0% and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) edged 0.7% lower, even as chipmaker Samsung projected a fivefold profit increase for the quarter.  A bullish report on semiconductors was also issued this morning, as Bank of America/Merrill (NYSE:BAC) upped its ratings on the sector, estimating 21% 2010 revenue gains versus 14%, and upgrading Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), Marvell (NASDAQ:MRVL) and LSI (NYSE:LSI) to "buy" and Maxim Integrated Products (NASDAQ:MXIM) and National Semiconductor (NYSE:NSM) to "neutral."  Sprint Nextel (NYSE:S) jumped 3.5% after receiving a ratings upgrade on strength of its Boost prepaid mobile telephone contracts. </p>
<p align="justify">Remarks from Obama advisor Tyson who noted a second stimulus package should be planned "on a contingency basis," and aimed at infrastructure investment may underscore remarks from Vice President Joe Biden Sunday complaining of a worse-than-anticipated economic legacy from ex-President Bush as well as the possibility of a second stimulus. </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-july-7-2009-market-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Budget Gaps   Investment Implications</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/state-budget-gaps-investment-implications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/state-budget-gaps-investment-implications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 04:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Muni Money Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Schwab & Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chubb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance company assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayor and governor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody’s Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Keegan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal Assistance Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC Teacher’s Pension Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overall systematic risk observer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard & Poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systematic aggregate tax observer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worst solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qvmgroup.com/invest/?p=5263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State budgets are a shambles. Sales taxes, corporate taxes, personal income taxes and other taxes are being raised all over the country.  The budget problems and consequential taxes will impact municipal bond rates and default risk, and after-tax investment returns on many forms of investment.
California Muni Money Funds:
We have been advising our California clients holding [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/state-budget-gaps-investment-implications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McClatchy Gets Upgrade &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/mcclatchy-gets-upgrade-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/mcclatchy-gets-upgrade-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gannett Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet operations;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Communications;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mcclatchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper publisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Poors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times Company;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post Co.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21760/McClatchy+Gets+Upgrade+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong><em></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Standard &#38; Poor's Upgrades McClatchy's Corporate Rating</em></strong></p>
<p>On Tuesday June 30, 2009, Standard &#38; Poor's raised its corporate credit rating for newspaper publisher <strong>McClatchy</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MNI" target="_self">MNI</a>) to "CC" (highly vulnerable) from "SD," (selective default). The rating agency still holds a negative view on the company on account of its possible restructuring.</p>
<p>Last Friday, June 26, both Standard &#38; Poor's and Moody's Investor Services had lowered their corporate ratings on the company following the debt exchange offer announced by McClatchy. Moody's lowered its corporate rating to "Caa2" from "Caa1", whereas Standard &#38; Poor's lowered its credit rating to "SD" from "CC." McClatchy offered to pay $60 million in cash and issue $175 million in new notes, with a 15.75% coupon rate due 2014, to replace $1.15 billion in debt owed to its bondholders.</p>
<p>The reason behind downgrading was the company's dubious ability to repay debt and high default risk. On the announcement of the completion of the debt exchange offer on June 26, only $102.9 million in debt had been tendered, (approximately 9% of $1.15 billion).</p>
<p>The recent marginal amendment to "CC" from "SD," by Standard &#38; Poor's was based on McClatchy's announcement that it exchanged $24.2 million in new senior notes and $3.4 million in cash, for a total of $102.9 million of senior notes.</p>
<p>McClatchy like other newspaper companies - <strong>The New York Times Company</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/NYT" target="_self">NYT</a>), <strong>Washington Post Co</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wpo" target="_self">WPO</a>), <strong>Gannett Co</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/gci" target="_self">GCI</a>) and <strong>Journal Communications </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/jnr" target="_self">JRN</a>) is in the midst of a secular and cyclical slowdown in print advertising. McClatchy, in a race for survival, is building its Internet operations, cutting costs, reducing its debt burden and has recently suspended its dividend.</p>
<p>However, postponement of $190 million land sale erodes visibility to any relief. We maintain a Sell rating on the stock with a six-month target price of $0.50. <br /></p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MNI">Read the full analyst report on "MNI"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=NYT">Read the full analyst report on "NYT"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WPO">Read the full analyst report on "WPO"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=GCI">Read the full analyst report on "GCI"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=JRN">Read the full analyst report on "JRN"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/mcclatchy-gets-upgrade-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s Action to Soothe PMI  &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-action-to-soothe-pmi-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-action-to-soothe-pmi-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genworth Financial Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MGIC Investment Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radian Group Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21636/Moody%27s+Action+to+Soothe+PMI++-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>On June 26, <b>PMI Group Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/pmi">PMI</a>), a California-based mortgage insurer, announced that <b>Moody's Investors Service</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mco">MCO</a>) confirmed its rating on PMI's senior unsecured debt to "B3" and junior subordinated debt to "Caa1". The outlook on the ratings was revised to developing. </p>
<p align="left">While the past downgrades by rating agencies have had a negative effect on PMI's eligibility to insure mortgage loans from GSEs and other private mortgage lenders, the recent action by Moody's will definitely give some relief to PMI. </p>
<p align="left">Moody's took this action as PMI successfully executed its Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Amended Agreement reduces the size of the facility to $125 million and eliminates certain financial covenants and events of default contained in the previous revolving credit facility. According to Moody's, amended terms of the credit facility would reduce PMI's near-term default risk. We think the Moody's action should offset the downside potential of the stock somewhat. </p>
<p align="left">Though the company may benefit from recent U.S. regulatory moves, we expect the losses to remain elevated in the coming quarters. At the current levels, shares of PMI trade at 0.15x the company's 1Q09 book value of $14.16 per share. This is significantly below its historical 2.2x high and 22% below the median of its peers like <b>MGIC Investment Corp.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mtg">MTG</a>), <b>Radian Group Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/rdn">RDN</a>) and <b>Genworth Financial Inc. </b>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/gnw">GNW</a>) </p>
<p align="left">Though the rise in delinquencies and defaults on loan payments may continue for longer than expected and lead to increased losses for mortgage insurers, we think that the downside risk is rather limited and hence have a Hold recommendation on the shares. </p>
<p align="left"></p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=PMI">Read the full analyst report on "PMI"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MCO">Read the full analyst report on "MCO"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MTG">Read the full analyst report on "MTG"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=RDN">Read the full analyst report on "RDN"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=GNW">Read the full analyst report on "GNW"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-action-to-soothe-pmi-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s Upgrades Debt Rating on DPL &amp; Subsidiary &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-upgrades-debt-rating-on-dpl-subsidiary-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-upgrades-debt-rating-on-dpl-subsidiary-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael G. Haggarty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Amended Substitute Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Utilities Commission of Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senior credit officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21626/Moody%27s+Upgrades+Debt+Rating+on+DPL+%26+Subsidiary+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Dayton, Ohio-based diversified energy utility <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">DPL Inc.</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/dpl">DPL</a>) and its subsidiary Dayton Power and Light Company were upgraded by Moody's Investors Service. On last Friday, June 26, Moody's upgraded the parent's senior unsecured debt rating to Baa1 from Baa2 and the subsidiary's senior secured debt rating to A1 from A2. </p>
<p align="left">The upside came from an approval for ESP settlement establishing rates till 2012 from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO). The ESP was originally filed in October 2008 as required by Ohio Amended Substitute Senate Bill No.221 (SB 221). </p>
<p align="left">Under the terms of the settlement, DP&#38;L will freeze base distribution and generation rates through 2012, with limited exceptions including changes in regulatory and tax laws, storm damage costs, costs associated with any new climate change laws or regulations, and certain regional transmission organization related costs. </p>
<p align="left">The settlement lent stability to the fortunes of DPL, which was rocked on the troubled shores of the Midwest economy. DPL's issuer rating rose to A2 from A3 while the rating of its preferred stock improved to Baa1 from Baa2. Moody's also upgraded the trust preferred securities of DPL Capital Trust II to Baa2 from Baa3. The rating outlooks of DPL and DP&#38;L are still positive, subsequent to the July 2008 upgrade from stable. </p>
<p align="left">Michael G. Haggarty, a Moody's senior credit officer observed, "The upgrade reflects the credit supportive cost recovery provisions included in the company's rate plan, which will provide rate stability and potentially improve the utility's already strong cash flow coverage ratios at least through 2012." </p>
<p align="left">With a high dividend yield of 4.9 and ROE of 23.5%, DPL was nominated as one of Forbes' "100 Most Trustworthy Companies" in 2009. The defensive stock (Beta: 0.58) rose more than 8% over the past month. All this gives us enough confidence to continue our Buy rating of the stock. </p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=DPL">Read the full analyst report on "DPL"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-upgrades-debt-rating-on-dpl-subsidiary-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Small-Cap Equity Funds &#8211; Mutual Fund Commentary</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-small-cap-equity-funds-mutual-fund-commentary-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-small-cap-equity-funds-mutual-fund-commentary-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carter's Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dun & Bradstreet Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Payments Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard F. Aster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21614/Top+Small-Cap+Equity+Funds+-+Mutual+Fund+Commentary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today we are featuring top-performing "Small-Cap" equity mutual funds, which invest primarily in equity securities of companies with market capitalizations of less than $1 billion. 
<p align="left">Investors can find such funds by checking out the entire list of the <a href="http://www.zacks.com/funds/mutualfund/allmfs.php?rank_in=ALL&#38;TableType=1Y&#38;fundtype=Equity - Small Cap" target="_self">Zacks #1 Rank Small-Cap equity Funds.</a><br /><br /><b>3 Strong Samples <br /><br /></b><b>Old Westbury Global Small &#38; Mid Cap</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/funds/mfrank/quotes.php?t=OWSMX&#38;type=main">OWSMX</a>) was incepted in April 2005. The investment seeks long term capital appreciation. </p>
<p align="left">The fund invests in a broad, diversified portfolio of common stocks of small and medium capitalization companies traded in the U.S. or in foreign countries, including emerging market countries. </p>
<p align="left">The fund's top holdings include Carter's Inc. (<a href="void(0)">CRI</a>), Dun &#38; Bradstreet Corp. (<a href="void(0)">DNB</a>) and Global Payments Inc. (<a href="void(0)">GPN</a>). </p>
<p align="left"><b>Janus Triton</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/funds/mfrank/quotes.php?t=JATTX&#38;type=main">JATTX</a>) seeks long-term growth of capital. The fund is designed for investors looking to diversify their portfolio and add the upside potential of small to mid-sized growth companies. </p>
<p align="left">Small-and medium-sized companies have a market capitalization of less than $10 billion. The fund may invest in foreign equity and debt securities, which may include investments in emerging markets. </p>
<p align="left">Unit holders have to make a minimum initial investment of $2,500 to enter this Zacks#1 Rank ("Strong Buy") fund. It has an expense ratio of 1.20%. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Meridian Growth</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/funds/mfrank/quotes.php?t=MERDX&#38;type=main">MERDX</a>) seeks long-term growth of capital. The fund invests primarily in growth stocks, including those with small and medium sized market values. </p>
<p align="left">The fund may also invest in debt and equity-related securities, bonds rated A or better by Moody's, and securities of foreign companies, including emerging-market firms. It may invest up to 25% of total assets in securities of foreign companies. </p>
<p align="left">Richard F. Aster has managed the fund since its inception in August 1984. The fund has topped the total returns of its benchmark index in the last 1-.3-and 5-year periods. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Discover Many More Funds</b> </p>
<p align="left">Learn more about the new Zacks Mutual Fund Rank and discover some of the best market-beating mutual funds by browsing our <a href="http://www.zacks.com/funds/mutualfund/">new mutual funds section.</a> This part of Zacks.com offers a variety of tools, including mutual fund research, a new mutual fund screener, helpful answers to frequently asked questions and quick access to prospectuses and other information.</p>
<p align="left">By applying the Zacks Rank to mutual funds, investors can find funds that not only outpaced the market in the past but are also expected to outperform going forward.</p>
<p align="left"></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-small-cap-equity-funds-mutual-fund-commentary-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commercial Real Estate Plunging &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/commercial-real-estate-plunging-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/commercial-real-estate-plunging-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog 
Yesterday;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fdic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential real estate prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21482/Commercial+Real+Estate+Plunging+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Yesterday, <a target="_self" href="http://www.rcanalytics.com/Reports/misc/Moody%27s_June_2009_Report.pdf">Moody's released its commercial real estate index</a> and reported that nationwide prices for all types of commercial real estate (CRE) plunged by 8.6% in April from March and now stand 25.3% below a year ago, and are off 29.5% from their October 2007 peak.<br /><br />The Moody's/REAL CPPI is a repeat sales index constructed very much along the same lines as the Case-Schiller index of residential real estate prices. In the graph below, Calculated Risk (<a target="_self" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/06/cre-and-residential-re-prices.html">http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/06/cre-and-residential-re-prices.html</a>) has overlaid the Case-Schiller index on the graph from the Moody's report. It clearly appears that CRE prices follow housing prices with about an 18-month lag.<br /><br />This is consistent with other findings that investment in CRE (i.e. new building of offices and stores) follows residential investment by about the same period. While the CRE price decline started later than that for houses, it is happening at a much faster rate.<br /><br />While the all property index shows a monthly change, the sub-indexes by property type are only available on a quarterly change basis. Relative to three months ago, office building prices have been particularly hard hit, plunging 18.6%. Prices of retail buildings have fallen by 12.9%.<br /><br />By comparison prices for Apartments and Industrial space have held up well, dropping by just 0.4% each. However, on a year-over-year basis they are both down sharply, Industrial space by 12.3% and Apartments by 16.1%. On a year-over-year basis, retail space has lost 18.5% of its value while office space has plunged by 28.9%.<br /><br />The reason why the value of CRE is falling is not a mystery. If stores are closing, then they will not be paying rent, and landlords will not be in a position to get rent increases from the remaining stores. If a company is laying off lots of people it will have lots of empty cubicles and offices, and will be looking to sublet its existing space, competing directly with the landlords trying to rent out existing space.<br /><br />In addition, as recently as the second half of last year, construction of new commercial real estate was still very robust, meaning that there is lots of new space that has recently come on line. Still, a 8.6% decline in a single month is startling and is very bad news for REITs like <span style="font-weight: bold;">Mack-Cali </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cli">CLI</a>), <span style="font-weight: bold;">Liberty Properties</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/lry">LRY</a>), <span style="font-weight: bold;">Post Properties</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/pps">PPS</a>) and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Cousins Properties </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cuz">CUZ</a>).<br /><br />We have already seen commercial delinquencies and foreclosures start to rise, and this will be a major headache for the banks going forward. Many small- and mid-sized banks ($1-10 billion in assets) are very heavily exposed to CRE. This could cause them to be the guest of honor at one of the Friday night pizza parties put on by the FDIC. However, individually these banks do not threaten the financial system the way the stress-tested 19 would if they failed.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1245955047.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CLI">Read the full analyst report on "CLI"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=LRY">Read the full analyst report on "LRY"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=PPS">Read the full analyst report on "PPS"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/commercial-real-estate-plunging-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>S&amp;P&#8217;s Downgrade Weighs on Wilmington &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/sps-downgrade-weighs-on-wilmington-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/sps-downgrade-weighs-on-wilmington-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware-chartered bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate lending concentration;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilmington Trust Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilmington Trust Corporation;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21476/S%26P%27s+Downgrade+Weighs+on+Wilmington+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>On June 17, 2009, S&#38;P's Ratings Services (S&#38;P) lowered ratings and revised its outlook on <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Wilmington Trust Corporation </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wl">WL</a>) along with 22 rated U.S. banks. S&#38;P lowered its outlook to "negative" from "negative watch" on Wilmington and HAD downgraded its long-term counterparty credit rating to "BBB" from "BBB+" earlier. S&#38;P believes that operating conditions for the industry will become less favorable, compared to the past, characterized by greater volatility in financial markets during credit cycles and tighter regulatory supervision. </p>
<p align="left">However, Wilmington's 1Q09 results exceeded expectations mainly due to lower-than-expected provision expense, which more than offset the decline in net interest income and non-interest income. Credit metrics were mixed during the quarter, with non-performing assets increasing to 2.67% of related assets (up 48 bps sequentially) and year-to-date net charge-offs at 0.22% of average loans (down 35 bps sequentially). During the reported quarter, net charge-offs improved somewhat sequentially but non-performing asset levels continued to increase. Moody's downgraded the rating of the company in April 2009 based on concerns related to its real estate lending concentration and investments in bank trust preferred securities. </p>
<p align="left">Wilmington Trust Corporation is a mid-cap financial holding company whose primary subsidiary, Wilmington Trust Company, is a Delaware-chartered bank and trust company. As of March 31, 2009, Wilmington had $11.5 billion in total assets, $9.4 billion in loans and leases, and $8.3 billion in deposits. Including its three advisory affiliates, Wilmington had $42.9 billion in assets under management, as of this date. </p>
<p align="left">We remain most concerned about Wilmington's exposure to construction loans (21% of the average loan portfolio). Within the construction loan portfolio, 71% loans are for residential construction/land development. Though Wilmington lends only to smaller homebuilders in the Delaware Valley (60% of the construction loan portfolio) and not to national homebuilders, we expect further deterioration in the credit quality on account of the ongoing weakness in sales. </p>
<p align="left">Further, as the Housing and Commercial Real Estate pricing continues to worsen and unemployment continues to rise, we expect further losses in other loan categories as well, especially Commercial Mortgage (21% of loan portfolio), Residential Mortgage (6%) and Consumer (17%) loan portfolios. </p>
<p align="left">Ahead of its 2Q09 results, scheduled to release on July 24, 2009, we are maintaining our Sell recommendation on the shares mainly due to our concerns related to its large construction portfolio. </p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WL">Read the full analyst report on "WL"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/sps-downgrade-weighs-on-wilmington-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Market News for June 24, 2009 &#8211; Market News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-june-24-2009-market-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-june-24-2009-market-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[787 Dreamliner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBR Capital;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bank for Reconstruction and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association Of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york stock exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil And Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21400/Stock+Market+News+for+June+24%2C+2009+-+Market+News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">Stocks struggled yesterday as better-than-expected results from Treasury's $40 billion auction of 2-year notes eased concerns that government borrowings to help fund various measures will spike interest rates.  The S&#38;P 500 index, which had fallen 3.1% on Monday, edged up 0.2% and the tech heavy Nasdaq lost 0.1%, or 1.27 points, to 1,764.92.  The Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped 0.2% lower to 8322.91 as Boeing (NYSE:BA) once again postponed the first flight of the 787 Dreamliner.  The plane-maker declined 6.5% and offset strength in banking components Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) and JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM). Market breadth was negative. On the New York Stock Exchange, losers beat winners by a narrow margin on volume of 1.21 billion shares. Meanwhile, Moody's advised that US government's credit rating of triple-A remains intact. </p>
<p align="justify">Among the number of economic posts that are due today, investors are likely to take a cue from Federal Reserve's interest-rate policy announcement that is due at 2.15 ET.  Expectations are that the central bank will hold the interest rates steady.  Also, May new home sales report is due out after the start of trading.  Monday saw increased risk-aversion in the market after the World Bank's report and the Vix volatility measure jumped 11.4%.  </p>
<p align="justify">But as governments across the world have geared up to prevent a collapse of the financial system, and a full-blown depression has been avoided, investors will now look toward the Fed for guidance on its exit strategy, on any expansion of its $300 billion Treasury purchase plan, as well as its views on rising yields. A bullish view form the Fed would likely put equities back on track to resume its three-month rally.</p>
<p align="justify">Among S&#38;P sector groupings, six recorded moderate declines yesterday, with utilities down 1.0%, consumer services off 0.7%, consumer goods off 0.3%, industrials and tech down 0.2%, and health care off 0.1%.  Basic material sector shares jumped 1.9% and oil and gas edged up 0.7%  Financials, taking a cue from FBR Capital's raised earnings projections and price target on Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), advanced 1.4%.</p>
<p align="justify">According to the National Association of Realtors, existing home sales gave further evidence that housing may be stabilizing as falling prices, increased foreclosure activity and government tax breaks attracted buyers, sending sales 2.4% higher in May, though slightly lower than an expected 2.6% increase. </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-june-24-2009-market-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Plan Spares Rating Agencies &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/obama-plan-spares-rating-agencies-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/obama-plan-spares-rating-agencies-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst Blog  President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fitch Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McGraw-Hill's  ( ) S&P Rating Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities And Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21307/Obama+Plan+Spares+Rating+Agencies+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />President Obama's regulatory reform plan appears to be a good beginning for restoring the confidence in the financial system, but there are many areas where it does not go far enough, like the revamp of the rating agencies. Despite their significant  role in the credit crisis, the impact of the proposed changes in the plan on rating agencies is minimal.<br /><br />The rating agencies play a crucial role in the capital markets by rating everything from simple corporate bonds to complex structured investments like mortgage backed securities. Institutional investors rely heavily on credit ratings while deciding their purchases. Banks are also required by law to take ratings into account when investing in bonds.<br /><br />Top rating agencies like <span style="font-weight: bold;">Moody's</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mco">MCO</a>), <span style="font-weight: bold;">McGraw-Hill's </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mhp">MHP</a>) S&#38;P Rating Services and Fitch Ratings are paid by issuers whose securities they rate, thus creating an incentive to assign high ratings in order to win more business. This system creates a conflict of interest and at times companies are even threatened with lower ratings if they don't pay particular ratings agencies.<br /><br />The plan does nothing to address this key shortcoming of the system -- the "issuer pay" model.<br /><br />Many of the mortgages and other securities which were awarded high ratings by the rating agencies later proved worthless, fueling the financial crisis.<br /><br />The plan does make many comments and suggestions to improve oversight of the ratings process and to better manage conflicts of interest. However, the proposals are similar to the changes that were already being considered by the SEC, or even the rating agencies themselves.<br /><br />The proposal also calls for regulators to reduce their reliance on agency ratings in regulations and supervisory practices wherever possible, but does not offer an alternative to the current system.<br /><br />The plan proposes that the SEC continue its efforts to strengthen the regulation of credit rating agencies, and it would also require the agencies to differentiate between credit ratings assigned to complex mortgage-related investments and more traditional bonds.<br /><br />The rating agencies have also escaped any liability for their ratings which later proved to be worthless under First Amendment protection, and the proposal does not change that, which may result in continuation of their irresponsible behavior in the future.  
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MCO">Read the full analyst report on "MCO"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MHP">Read the full analyst report on "MHP"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/obama-plan-spares-rating-agencies-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limited Brands Plans $500m Offering &#8211; Zacks Tale of the Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/limited-brands-plans-500m-offering-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/limited-brands-plans-500m-offering-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21080/Limited+Brands+Plans+%24500m+Offering+-+Zacks+Tale+of+the+Tape</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b><br />Limited Brands Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/LTD">LTD</a>) plans to raise $500 million in senior notes, due 2019, through the private placement route. 
<p>The company said that proceeds from the placement will be utilized for reducing debt and for general corporate purposes. </p>
<p>The specialty retailer's performance has been affected by the continuing slowdown in discretionary spending by consumers, which caused May same-store sales to contract 7% year over year. </p>
<p>Limited Brands' corporate rating was cut further into junk territory by Moody's last month on weak sales and earnings results. The agency, however, did highlight the company's sound liquidity position in its report. </p>
<p>Shares of the Zacks #3 Rank ("Hold") company have slipped more than 2% on volume of almost 2 million, which is lower than the average daily volume of about 4.8 million. </p>
<p></p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZRANK&#38;t=LTD">"LTD" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/limited-brands-plans-500m-offering-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Make Stock Market Returns -Without Stock Market Risk!-</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/make-stock-market-returns-without-stock-market-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/make-stock-market-returns-without-stock-market-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Herring;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sallie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve McDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pThe mutual fund industry has done their best to convince investors that the long-term return of the stock market is just over 12%. That is their justification for “buy and hold.” But you can throw that number out the window.br /
The annualized return of the S#38;P 500 from 1929 through 2008 is actually 8.9%. And for most active investors the return would be significantly less./p
pBut what if I told you that you can make two to three times the long term stock market average (15% to 30% annual returns)… without taking stock market risk?/p
pConsidering the return of the stock market the last couple of years and the fundamentals going forward, I hope you’ll give this your consideration. So how do you#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/make-stock-market-returns-without-stock-market-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Principal Financial Funds &#8211; Mutual Fund Education</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-principal-financial-funds-mutual-fund-education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-principal-financial-funds-mutual-fund-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon.com Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Pokrzywinski;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juniper Networks Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell 1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Principal Financial Funds;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21010/Top+Principal+Financial+Funds+-+Mutual+Fund+Education</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><b>SAM Flexible Income A</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/funds/mfrank/quotes.php?t=SAUPX&#38;type=main">SAUPX</a>) was incepted in July 1996. The investment seeks to provide a high level of total return, consisting of reinvestment of income with some capital appreciation. </p>
<p align="left">The fund operates as a fund of funds and invests principally in underlying funds. It may invest up to 40% of assets in any single fixed-income fund as well as cash equivalents, no more than 30% of its net assets in equity funds, and may invest up to 30% of the assets in any single equity fund. </p>
<p align="left">The fund offers dividends quarterly and capital gains annually. It has an expense ratio of 0.67%. </p>
<p align="left"><b>LargeCap Growth I A</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/funds/mfrank/quotes.php?t=OMSOX&#38;type=main">OMSOX</a>) seeks long-term growth of capital. The fund mainly invests in equity securities of companies with market capitalizations within the range of Russell 1000 Growth index. </p>
<p align="left">The fund normally focuses on companies with an above-average rate of earnings and cash flow growth and a lucrative niche in the economy that gives them the ability to sustain earnings momentum even during times of slow economic growth. As of January 2009, its portfolio turnover was 64.50%. </p>
<p align="left">Apple Inc. (<a href="void(0)">AAPL</a>), Juniper Networks Inc. (<a href="void(0)">JNPR</a>) and Amazon.com Inc. (<a href="void(0)">AMZN</a>) are among the fund's key holdings. </p>
<p align="left"><b>High Yield A</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/funds/mfrank/quotes.php?t=CPHYX&#38;type=main">CPHYX</a>) invests primarily in high-yield, high-risk, junk bonds in search of a relatively high level of current income. </p>
<p align="left">The fund invests normally at least 80% of net assets in a diversified portfolio of fixed-income securities rated lower than BBB by S&#38;P or Fitch or rated lower than Baa by Moody's or of equivalent quality. Gary Pokrzywinski has managed the fund since its inception in April 1998. </p>
<p align="left">Unit holders have to make a minimum initial investment of $1,000 to enter this Zacks#1 Rank ("Strong Buy") fund. The fund has outperformed the total returns of its benchmark index in the last 1-, 3-and 5-year periods. </p>
<p align="left"></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-principal-financial-funds-mutual-fund-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Market News for June 3, 2009 &#8211; Market News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-june-3-2009-market-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-june-3-2009-market-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allergan Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Horton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intuitive Surgical Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KB Homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association Of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pulte Homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toll Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20700/Stock+Market+News+for+June+3%2C+2009+-+Market+News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">U.S. stocks continued their advance Tuesday as an optimism that housing market is showing signs of life offset concerns that sale of shares will hurt several lenders who plan to repay the bailout money.  Helping the sentiment further was the S&#38;P 500's move above its 200-day moving average.  Stocks seesawed between gains and losses after the opening bell but the release of housing data helped cool nerves and the major indexes managed to end the day in positive territory.     </p>
<p align="justify">The National Association of Realtors' index for pending home sales continued its advance for the third month in a row, rising 6.7% in April.  At day's end, the Dow Jones industrial average managed a gain of 19 points or 0.2%, after briefly turning positive for the year.  The S&#38;P 500 edged up 0.2% and Nasdaq gained 0.4%.  Volume on the NYSE remained light with 1.4 billion shares exchanging hands with advancing issues outpacing declining stocks by a three-to-two margin.   Yesterday, better-than-expected reports on personal income, manufacturing and construction spending had propelled S&#38;P 500 to a seven-month high.</p>
<p align="justify">Treasury Secretary Geithner, travelling to China amid growing worries in that country over the prospects of American economy, sought to calm nerves, noting, "What I sense is a fair amount of confidence in the underlying strength of the American economy."  There is a growing worry in China, the largest holder of American debt, that bulging deficit in the US could hurt the dollar and obliterate the value of US Treasuries held by China.  Treasury prices edged slightly higher on optimism following the friendly talks in China.  However, US dollar dropped to its lowest since late September, declining 0.9% against a basket of currencies, after crude prices, continued to hover near the year's high set on Monday.</p>
<p align="justify">Among DJIA components, American Express (NYSE:AXP) and Citigroup (NYSE:C) led the list of declining components, off 4.9%, respectively.  JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM) dropped 4.5%. Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) shares, however, gained 1.8% after the company said it has raised almost $33 billion, and said it would easily achieve the $33.9 billion capital requirement.  During the last four weeks, banks have raised more than $85 billion, with American Express (NYSE:AXP), JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) raising $7.7 billion meet heightened cash payback requirements. Nevertheless, Moody's (NYSE:MCO) also maintained a negative outlook on banks and their credit outlook, noting US companies are expected to face $470 billion in pretax loan losses and write downs this year and next.</p>
<p align="justify">Allergan Inc. (NYSE:AGN) added 4.6% to $46.23 and Intuitive Surgical Inc. jumped 6.5% to $159.05 after the stocks were upgraded by analysts. </p>
<p align="justify">Following the positive housing data, D.R. Horton (NYSE:DHI) added 4.1% to $9.63; Pulte Homes (NYSE:PHM) increased 3.5% to $8.97; KB Homes (NYSE:KBH) shares rose 2.7% and Toll Brothers (NYSE:TOL) was up 3.9%.  This morning, Toll Brothers (NYSE:TOL) reported a second quarter loss of 52 cents a share, before items, versus the expectations of a 50 cents a share loss.  Revenues during the quarter plunged 51.3% year-over-year to $398.3 million. The company said it expects deliveries of 2200-2800 homes this year, versus its March guidance of 2000-3000 homes, but at lower delivery prices.</p>
<p align="justify">According to Autodata, Aggressive April discounting resulted in a total auto market annualized selling rate of 9.91 million, up from April's 9.32 million, and the highest so far this year.  Ford (NYSE:F) shares rose 4.6% on the news, while General Motors (OTC:GMGMQ), now trading in the pink sheets, plunged 18.7%.<br /></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-june-3-2009-market-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reboot…</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/reboot%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/reboot%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Gold Report</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gold Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank nationalizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Coffin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Coffin;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas importers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Rock Advisory Journal;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junior mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york stock exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red metal fruit;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rupee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockwork Consulting Ltd;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Stock Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.K. government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workable banking systems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yellow metal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/reboot%e2%80%a6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: David and Eric Coffin, Hard Rock Advisory Journal  05/29/2009
The greatest economic realignment since Genghis Kahn took over Eurasia’s trade routes is continuing apace. The west remains mired in an assets contraction of its own making, and the east is refocused on channeling its growth engines into domestic consumption. The resource sector, which is our focus [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/reboot%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Market News for May 28, 2009 &#8211; Market News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-may-28-2009-market-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-may-28-2009-market-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beleaguered automaker;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dimon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy  shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikkei 225]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS YP-T10JAB BLK/4 GB/FM/VIDEO/2.0"SCR (YP-T10JAB/XSA) Digital Media Player;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Bancorp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Mutual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells fargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20533/Stock+Market+News+for+May+28%2C+2009+-+Market+News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">Asian markets were mixed Thursday as looming bankruptcy of General Motors and rising government bond yields threatened to hurt prospects of a global economic recovery.  At day's end Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 stock average edged up 0.13% to 9,451.39 and South Korea's Kospi advanced 2.2% to close at 1,392.17.</p>
<p align="justify">Stock futures suggest a higher opening on the Wall Street.  Dow Jones industrial average futures rose 0.4% to 8,327. Standard &#38; Poor's 500 index futures rose 0.3% to 895.30 and Nasdaq 100 index futures were up 0.4% to 1,409.00.</p>
<p align="justify">On Wednesday, U.S. stocks sank amid growing worries over the fate of General Motors (NYSE:GM) and rising yields on longer-term US government debt.  An encouraging housing report did little to contain the selloff as yields on the benchmark 10-year jumped to a 6-month high. Energy shares declined but financials were the leading laggards.  Shaking investor confidence yesterday were yields on 10-year Treasuries which climbed 0.18 percentage point, or 18 basis points, to 3.732%.  According to Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) the US will sell $3.25 trillion in Treasuries by the end of the September fiscal year, as the US funds bank bailouts, stimulus spending and a record budget deficit.</p>
<p align="justify">General Motors' (NYSE:GM) bondholders turned down a $27 billion bond swap offer and many analysts said bankruptcy is imminent for the beleaguered automaker. The decline was broad based as all S&#38;P sectors ended in the red.  The S&#38;P 500 stock average declined 1.9% for its highest decline in two weeks.  The DJIA shed 173 points, or 2.1%, to close at 8300. Technology focused NASDAQ managed a 1.1% drop.  Volume on the NYSE remained low as only 1.3 billion shares exchanged hands.  The CBOE Vix, the measure of market volatility, however, surged 5.7% to 32.36.  On the NYSE, declining stocks outpaced advancing issues by a four-to-one margin.  SanDisk (NASDAQ:SNDK), which renewed a licensing agreement with Samsung Electronics, led the gainers on the S&#38;P 500, with a 14.3% jump to $15.52.</p>
<p align="justify">This morning Moody's (NYSE:MCO) asserted the US AAA sovereign rating is "stable," despite a heavy debt burden.  Moody's cited a diverse and resilient US economy, strong government institutions, high per capita income and a fundamental position in the global economy for its stable outlook.  Wednesday's Treasury auction of 5-year notes met with successful demand, with a 2.3 bid-to-cover ratio; today $26 billion 7-year notes will be auctioned. The government plans to turn out $101 billion in debt this week. </p>
<p align="justify">On the DJIA, all but two components slid.  Among the declining issues, General Motors (NYSE:GM) led on the downside with a 20.1% fall.  Many fear bankruptcy of the automaker would add to already swollen unemployment numbers and wreak havoc on the economy.  JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM) shares plunged 5.2% after CEO Dimon's said credit card losses at its Washington Mutual unit could rise to 24% by year-end. Nevertheless, Dimon remained optimistic on company's earnings prospects, noting that reduced leverage would be more than offset by increased interest rate spreads, providing 18 to 20 per cent return on equity. Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) announced that it has raised almost $26 billion in capital since results of the government stress test found the bank needed $33.9 billion in additional capital.  The bank also noted the possible issuance of 564 million additional common shares through an exchange of perpetual preferred shares for common stcok. Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) declined 6.1% to $24.08. U.S. Bancorp slid 5.7% to $17.96.  PNC Financial Services, which said it has raised $600 million in a common stock offering, declined 5% to $41.11.</p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-may-28-2009-market-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment News Briefs Thursday May 28. 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/investment-news-briefs-thursday-may-28-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/investment-news-briefs-thursday-may-28-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaa Credit Rating Stable;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ali al-Naimi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centre for Economics and Business Research;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Yun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maybank Investment Bank Bhd.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association Of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office       supply retailer;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacy Smith;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staples Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suhaimi Ilias;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pExisting Home Sales Up 2.9%; Malaysia’s Economy Shrinks 6.2%; Staples Beats Estimates; U.K. Millionaires Halved by Financial Crisis; Treasury Yield Spread Hits Record High; Intel Won’t Cut Dividend After Euro Fine; Moody’s: U.S. Aaa Credit Rating Stable; Oil Surges to Six-Month High/p
ul type="disc"
liExisting home sales in the United States ticked up 2.9% in April, according to the National Association of Realtors. The report suggests the a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/gc03/idUSN2754905920090527" target="_blank"housing       glut is turning around, but from the bottom up/a. “Most of the sales are taking place in lower price ranges and activity is beginning to pick-up in the mid-price ranges, but high-end home sales remain sluggish,” NAR chief economist Lawrence Yun told reporters, strongemReuters/em/strong reported./li
/ul
ul type="disc"
liMalaysia’s economy shrank 6.2% in the first quarter on slumping exports, making#8230;/li/ul]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/investment-news-briefs-thursday-may-28-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On to Moscow!</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/on-to-moscow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/on-to-moscow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Napoleon Bernanke;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times
 of London;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Federal Reserve Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Akron;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=16761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pLast week, the European Central Bank squared its shoulders and joined ranks of the damned. emThe Times/em of London reported that in joining up with the US Federal Reserve Bank and the Bank of England, strongthe European Central Bank “pulled out all the stops” in their drive to revive their economies./strong /p
pThe ECB announced that it will cut its key lending rate to its lowest level ever and begin a form of “quantitative easing,” in which it will buy corporate debt in order to reduce commercial interest rates. Details to follow, it said. “Stops” are to central bankers what safety fuses are to electricians. You may take them out when you really want to get the juice flowing; but your house might#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/on-to-moscow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Market News for May 15, 2009 &#8211; Market News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-may-15-2009-market-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-may-15-2009-market-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ak Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA's;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Djia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Chemical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortress Investment Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newmont Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nordstrom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Empire Manufacturing;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology firms;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells fargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whole Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20213/Stock+Market+News+for+May+15%2C+2009+-+Market+News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">With Wal-Mart reporting its earnings yesterday, an eventful earnings season almost closed its books. Although the performance of companies during the quarter was not as bad as feared, it was not encouraging either. The 455 S&#38;P firms that have reported their earnings so far posted a 35% y/y profit declines.  For the full year, analysts expect a 13% earnings fall among S&#38;P firms to $56.57. Nevertheless, investors once again showed appetite for risk and went bargain hunting.  The S&#38;P registered a 1.5% advance, and the NASDAQ added 1.0%. The DJIA edged 0.6% higher.</p>
<p align="justify">Financials were once again the leading gainers, with a 3.5% advance. JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM) shares jumped 4.4%, Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) added 2.7%, and Citigroup (NYSE:C) was up 4.1%. Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC), fresh from its $8.6 billion stock sale, jumped 6.2% after Moody's (NYSE:MCO) raised its ratings on the company's preferred shares, saying there is an improved likelihood of maintaining the dividend payout. The rating agency put Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) on review for an upgrade on consideration of its financial strength. Fortress Investment Group (NYSE:FIG), however, lost 5.3% after the company said an offering of its 40 million shares was priced at $5 each.  The 3-month LIBOR witnessed its biggest drop in three months, declining to a record low of 0.85%.</p>
<p align="justify">On Thursday, basic material shares jumped 2.2% and technology stocks were up 1.5%.  Among material stocks, Dow Chemical (NYSE:DOW) surged 6.0%, AK Steel (NYSE:AKS) was up 2.9% and Newmont Mining (NYSE:NEM) added 1.7%.  CA's (NYSE:CA) better-than-expected results helped technology firms register a 1.5% advance.  Reflecting improved Chinese demand for commodities, such as iron ore, coal and grains, the Baltic Dry Index jumped to its highest level this year. </p>
<p align="justify">Consumer spending nevertheless remained a core area of interest as several better-than-expected returns boosted sentiment yesterday, after Wednesday's 0.4% drop in April retail sales disappointed investors.  Although Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) reported inline earnings, its revenues came in below expectations.  Whole Foods (NASDAQ:WFMI) shares, however, added 2.8% after the company's cost controls measures helped it post better-than-expected earnings. Nike (NYSE:NKE) announced plans to lay off 1,750 jobs.  Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN), up 3.4% Thursday, posted better-than-expected first quarter earnings on inline revenues, and raised its full-year guidance.</p>
<p align="justify">Today's consumer price report is expected to have shown no change in April, with a 0.1% increase in core prices. NY Empire Manufacturing data is expected to come in at a negative 15.00.  Industrial production is expected to show a 0.6% m/m drop, with capacity utilization coming in at 68.9% from 69.3% prior.</p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-may-15-2009-market-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s Honors Wells Fargo&#8217;s Capital Raise &#8211; Zacks Tale of the Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-honors-wells-fargos-capital-raise-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-honors-wells-fargos-capital-raise-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit ratings agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large banks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york stock exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells fargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20196/Moody%27s+Honors+Wells+Fargo%27s+Capital+Raise+-+Zacks+Tale+of+the+Tape</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Moody's Investors Service upgraded <b>Wells Fargo &#38; Co.</b>'s (<a href="void(0)">WFC</a>) preferred stock rating by two notches on Thursday, saying that the bank's financial flexibility had improved after an $8.6 billion stock sale. </p>
<p align="left">The San Francisco, California-based firm had to raise capital by selling shares after the government's stress tests indicated that it required $13.7 billion to buffer itself against potential near-term losses. Federal regulators determined that Wells Fargo's requirement was second only to <b>Bank of America</b> (<a href="void(0)">BAC</a>) among the 10 large banks that had been asked to plug their capital holes. </p>
<p align="left">The credit ratings agency boosted Wells Fargo's preferred stock to Ba3 from B2 and said the bank's current capital position reduces the threat of a dividend cut. Moody's had slashed this rating by nine notches last March on concerns regarding Wells Fargo's short-term capital ratio. </p>
<p align="left">Shares of Wells Fargo jumped 5.74% to an intraday high of $25.59 at noon on the New York Stock Exchange. </p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZRANK&#38;t=WFC">"WFC" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moodys-honors-wells-fargos-capital-raise-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Market News for May 14, 2009 &#8211; Market News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-may-14-2009-market-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-may-14-2009-market-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beazer Homes;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caterpillar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAVID WALKER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fellow retailers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hang Seng 40]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home-Depot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovnanian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international energy agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york stock exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikkei 225]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office Depot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail shares;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunTrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20169/Stock+Market+News+for+May+14%2C+2009+-+Market+News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">Asian markets witnessed sharp losses Thursday after a decline in American retail sales dampened hopes of an economic recovery.  Japan's Nikkei 225 Stock Average slumped 2.6% to 9,093.73 and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index declined 3%.  South Korea's Kospi Index slid 2.4%.  Oil prices fell below $57 a barrel as disappointing retail sales numbers deflated hopes that consumer spending is starting to stabilize.  A study by Paris-based International Energy Agency said global oil consumption is expected to decline 3% in 2009. </p>
<p align="justify">The Commerce Department reported yesterday that U.S. retail sales declined 0.4% in April.  Economists had expected the number to remain unchanged.  Purchases at U.S. stores had tumbled 1.3% in March. </p>
<p align="justify">On Wednesday, U.S. stocks declined with the New York Stock Exchange witnessing the broadest sell-off in three weeks.  The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed 184.22 points, or 2.2%, to 8,284.89. The S&#38;P 500 Index declined for the third straight session, wiping off most of the gains it made last week.  The benchmark declined 2.7% to 883.92, and has lost 4.9% since the beginning of this week.  The tech-heavy Nasdaq declined 3%, or 51.73 points, at 1,664.19. Shares of industrial producers and consumer-related businesses bore the brunt. On the NYSE, volume was heavy as 1.76 billion shares exchanged hands and losing stocks outpaced advancing issues by a sixteen-to-one margin.</p>
<p align="justify">Treasury prices rallied as the unexpected decline in U.S. retail sales pushed investors towards risk aversion.  Dollar rose 0.7% against a basket of currencies.  Copper prices fell 3.2%; The DJ-UBS commodity index was off 1.2%.</p>
<p align="justify">Premarket futures are almost flat as inline earnings from Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) provided little boost to sentiments. According to a Financial Times article by a former US comptroller general, David Walker, the US' AAA debt rating is imperiled by the government's current excessive spending levels.</p>
<p align="justify">Optimism on the Street related to yesterday's retail sales was short lived as analysts failed to adequately assess the one-time, positive impact of January and February rebates from Social Security, which had helped revive consumer spending early this year.  Excluding autos, sales declined 0.5%.  As investors turned to cut positions, retail shares suffered, with Saks (NYSE:SKS) dropping 11.9%, Macy's (NYSE:M) plunging 6.7%, Target (NYSE:TGT) declining 4.8%, Costco (NASDAQ:COST) losing 2.3%, and Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) declining 1.2%. Office Depot (NYSE:ODP) shares plunged 15% after Moody's (NYSE:MCO) lowered the firm's debt rating.  Citigroup (NYSE:C) raised Home Depot (NYSE:HD) to "buy" from "hold," saying it expects the company to exceed this year's estimates; although fellow retailers declined, the shares bucked the trend with a 0.8% gain.</p>
<p align="justify">Basic materials led the declining sectors, off 5.8%, after weak demand assumptions from any economic recovery in the near-term hurt prospects. Alcoa (NYSE:AA) shares declined 8.8% on reports China may have restarted up to 1.4 million metric tons of capacity in April. Industrial shares fell 4.2%.  Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) shares declined 5.2%, General Electric (NYSE:GE) lost 5.6%, 3M (NYSE:MMM) fell 4.4%, and United Technologies (NYSE:UTX) lost 4.2%.</p>
<p align="justify">Financial shares were once again under renewed pressure, falling 5.0%, as investors pondered over the banks' ability to raise fresh capital from private sources. Among DJIA components, Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) plunged 9.5%, Citigroup (NYSE:C) lost 6.8%, and American Express (NYSE:AXP) declined 5.3%. BB&#38;T (NYSE:BBT) joined the growing list of banks tapping the market to raise funds, selling 75 million shares at $20 apiece, a discount to Tuesday's close of $22.50.  SunTrust (NYSE:STI) declined 6.9%, even as Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) upgraded the stock to "neutral" from "sell," citing better-than-expected stress test capital-raising needs.</p>
<p align="justify">Technology stocks showed signs of strength.  IBM (NYSE:IBM) said it expects 2009 earnings to be at least $9.20, versus consensus projections of $9.11, and noted it is "ahead of pace" to meet 2010 earnings projections of $10 to $12 per share. </p>
<p align="justify">Treasury Secretary Geithner's positive comments of "welcome signs" in the housing markets failed to convince investors as RealtyTrac reported increased foreclosures in April, with one in every 374 US homes receiving notices. Beazer Homes (NYSE:BZH) shares plunged 21.8%, and Hovnanian (NYSE:HOV) declined 12.2%.</p>
<p align="justify">Today's economic news covers wholesale prices for April, expected to show prices increased 0.1%. Besides the Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) inline post, weekly initial jobless claims are also expected to rate high on sentiment's Richter scale, with traders hoping for a continued diminished pace of claims.</p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-may-14-2009-market-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Seven-Decade Low for GM</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-seven-decade-low-for-gm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-seven-decade-low-for-gm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cape Coral/Ft.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cape Coral;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAVID WALKER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massive distribution site;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil tankers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhodesia;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saginaw;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bulford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterloo;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=16635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pUSA, General Motors and the state of California all to go Bankrupt/p
pAs GM goes#8230; so goes America#8230;/p
pUh oh#8230;/p
pStocks rose yesterday; the Dow went up 50 points. The bear market rally is still on. Oil touched the $60 mark#8230; a sure sign, say analysts, that the global economy is picking up. And the dollar fell further#8230; to $1.36 per euro. Gold held steady, at $912 an ounce./p
pWhile most stocks advanced yesterday, General Motors (NYSE:a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.co.uk/economic-forecasts/usa-general-motors-bankruptcy-54564.html"GM/a) backed up./p
pThe experts say the company is going broke. “Chapter 11 looms,” says a Bloomberg report. Investors sold the stock down to $1.15 – a price GM hasn’t seen in more than 70 years. At that price you can buy the whole company for $700 million. Peanuts.#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-seven-decade-low-for-gm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He Said What?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/he-said-what/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/he-said-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Addison Wiggin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Al Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Fleckenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HKD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I.O.U.S.A.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Mauldin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Incontrerra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koruna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLN;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sin City;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=16605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pForeclosures rise#8230;  Green Shoots, no so green!  Getting on a bus#8230;  Losing a triple A rating?                                                 And Now#8230; Today#8217;s Pfennig!br /
Good day#8230; And a Wonderful Wednesday to you! Not wanting to start the day off with bad news#8230; But I just saw a flash on the TV that said, #8220;foreclosures jumped 32% last month#8221;#8230; More Blood in the Streets, eh? That just happens to be the title of my presentation today#8230; Blood in the Street: Bargain time or just a cease fire? Hey! I don#8217;t make these things up#8230;/p
pOK#8230; Another day here in Sin City#8230; This city is packed with people, everywhere we go, it#8217;s simply amazing#8230; There#8217;s been no sign of a recession here#8230; Of course, if you got out#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/he-said-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Census Hiring and Reporting Methods Minimize April Unemployment Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/census-hiring-and-reporting-methods-minimize-april-unemployment-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/census-hiring-and-reporting-methods-minimize-april-unemployment-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays Capital plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dean Maki;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E.I. duPont Nemours & Co.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Naroff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zandi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redmond;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Severstal International;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steel Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Census Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wheeling;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=16482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pEmployers cut 539,000 jobs in April, the lowest total in six months, but the Labor Department said the unemployment rate still soared to 8.9%, from 8.5% in March. While some analysts viewed the latest report as a sign of a nascent economic recovery, the unemployment numbers are almost certain to head higher before the recession is declared over./p
pLast week’s report could have been worse if the numbers hadn’t been held in check by a burst of federal government hiring of temporary workers to prepare for the 2010 Census./p
pThe  report was also skewed by the way the government categorizes the  unemployed.  As strongema href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links"Money Morning/a/em/strong previously reported, a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/26/unemployment-rate-2/" target="_blank"if laid-off workers who have given up looking for  new jobs or have settled for part-time#8230;/a/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/census-hiring-and-reporting-methods-minimize-april-unemployment-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commercial Property Goes South &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/commercial-property-goes-south-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/commercial-property-goes-south-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avalon Bay;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog We]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/19573/Commercial+Property+Goes+South+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style: italic;">We highlight Avalon Bay (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/avb">AVB</a>) and Regency Centers (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/reg">REG</a>).</span>    
<p><b><u>Commercial Real Estate Values Go South</u></b></p>    
<p>The Moodys/Real National All Property Index dropped 0.6% in February compared to January of this year. In addition, the index is about 21% lower than a year ago, and about 18% lower than two years ago.</p>    
<p>This index tracks the change in sale prices for different property types based on sales of the same assets over time. The index is a good measure of where commercial property prices are going. The largest year over year price drop (February 2009 vs. February 2008) was reported in industrial, 13.9% decrease; followed by apartments, 13.6% decrease; office, 13.5% decrease; and retail, 8.5% decrease.  Also, according to the report, sales volumes in February were down 67% from the year ago period and most of the sales(90%) were for assets under $15 million.</p>    
<p>Some conclusions that can be inferred from this data:<br /></p>    
<ul>    
<li> Commercial property prices continue to fall, which could put many owners who bought at the height of the boom underwater on their mortgages.   <br /></li>    
<li> There will be a continued rise in loan defaults -- owners who have lostequity are more likely to walk away from their properties or sell at heavily discounted prices.</li>    
<li> Lower dollar deals are getting done vs. large transactions; financingfor smaller properties is easier, which should make price drops in this class &#62;$15 million, less severe.</li>    
<li> With financing still scarce and fundamentals going south, expect pricesto continue falling. Expect fewer transactions as owners are reluctant to take losses.</li>    
<li> Wait for more price drops before buying commercial real estate; whenbuying, focus on the larger, higher growth markets. According to the Moody's report, y/y price drops were significantly lower in the top 10 MSAs for all major property types (apartments, industrial, office, and retail).</li>    
<li> We still favor REITs with assets in supply constrained, urban markets,where values and rents will continue to hold up better. A couple of companies we have buys on are <span style="font-weight: bold;">Avalon Bay</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/avb">AVB</a>) for apartments and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Regency Centers </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/reg">REG</a>), a strip mall owner. Despite declining property values across these sectors, both companies are still trading below the value of their assets.</li></ul><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AVB">Read the full analyst report on "AVB"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=REG">Read the full analyst report on "REG"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/commercial-property-goes-south-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WL Beats but Gets Downgraded &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wl-beats-but-gets-downgraded-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wl-beats-but-gets-downgraded-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank-trust preferred securities;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate lending concentration;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate-construction loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilmington Trust Corp.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/19522/WL+Beats+but+Gets+Downgraded+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Wilmington Trust beats estimates, but gets a Moody's downgrade</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Wilmington Trust Corp.</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wl">WL</a>) reported its 1Q09 financial results this morning. 1Q09 net income came in at $21.8 million or $0.26 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $68.5 million $1.02 per diluted share in the prior quarter and net income of $41.4 million or $0.61 per diluted share in the prior-year quarter.<br /><br />On an operating basis (excluding after-tax securities gains and write-downs), net income for 1Q09 was $17.4 million or $0.19 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $6.1 million or $0.09 per diluted share for 4Q08. Operating earnings were substantially ahead of estimates, mainly due to a lower-than-expected provision expense which more than offset the decline in net interest income and non-interest income.<br /><br />Credit metrics were mixed during the quarter, with period end non-performing assets increasing to 2.67% of loans (up 48 bps sequentially), while year-to-date net charge-offs at 0.22% of average loans (down 35 bps sequentially). During the reported quarter, WL decreased provisions for loan losses to $29.5 million from $67.5 million at the end of 4Q08. The loan loss reserve ratio increased to 1.77% from 1.63% at the end of 4Q08.<br /><br />Tax-equivalent net interest income decreased 17.0% sequentially and 9.9% year-over-year to $79.0 million, as NIM [net interest margin] decreased 43 bps sequentially and 46 bps year-over-year to 2.91% at the end of 1Q09. Average loans decreased 1.0% sequentially but increased 10.2% year-over-year to $9.5 billion. Average deposits decreased 3.6% sequentially but remained almost flat compared to prior-year quarter to $7.9 billion.<br /><br />Core non-interest income (excluding securities gains) decreased 3.6% sequentially but increased 0.3% year-over-year to $103.1 million during 1Q09.<br /><br />Moody's downgraded the rating of the company this morning based on concerns related to its real estate lending concentration and investments in bank-trust preferred securities.<br /><br />We remain concerned with WL's exposure to commercial real estate-construction loans (about 20% of the portfolio). Within the construction loan portfolio, 75% loans are for residential construction/ land development. Though WL lends mainly to smaller homebuilders in the Delaware Valley (60% of the portfolio) and not to national homebuilders, we expect a further deterioration in the credit quality on account of the ongoing weakness in sales. We are also concerned about the recent rating downgrades.<br /><br />We are increasing our EPS estimates based on better-than-expected results, but maintaining our Sell recommendation on the shares mainly due to our concerns related to its large construction portfolio.
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WL">Read the full analyst report on "WL"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wl-beats-but-gets-downgraded-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ZION Gets a &#8216;Junk&#8217; Rating &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zion-gets-a-junk-rating-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zion-gets-a-junk-rating-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large commercial real estate;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zions Bancorporation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/19328/ZION+Gets+a+%27Junk%27+Rating+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">ZION reports loss for 1Q09; Moody's downgrades rating to Junk</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Zions Bancorporation</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/zion">ZION</a>) reported its 1Q09 results yesterday after market close. Net loss for the quarter was $832.2 million, or $7.29 per diluted share, mainly due to impairment and valuation losses of $1.35 per diluted share and noncash charges from goodwill impairment of $5.55 per diluted<br />share. After excluding special items, the loss from core banking operations was $0.39 per diluted common share.<br /><br />After the results, Moody's slashed Zions' senior debt rating eight notches to "B2," (junk grade), with a "negative" outlook, from "A3" (medium investment grade). Moody's rating action was due to significant pressure on the bank's capital position because of its large commercial real estate and collateralized debt obligation portfolio.<br /><br />Net loans and leases were $41.9 billion at March 31, 2009, up 2.6% from $41.7 billion at December 31, 2008. Average total deposits for the quarter increased 25.7% sequentially to $42.1 billion.<br /><br />Net interest margin was down to 3.93% for 1Q09, from 4.20% for 4Q08, mainly due to increase in the short-term investments and an increase in nonaccrual loans. Net interest income decreased $33.6 million to $474.8 million compared to $508.4 million for prior quarter. Non-interest income for the quarter was a negative $111.6 million compared to a negative $82.3 million for the prior quarter. The loss was mainly due to impairment and valuation losses on securities.<br /><br />Credit quality deteriorated sharply and nonperforming assets increased to 4.00% of net loans and leases, at March 31, 2009 compared to 2.71% at December 31, 2008, mainly due to deterioration in the commercial real estate loans in Nevada, Arizona and Texas and commercial and industrial loans in Utah. The provision for loan losses was $297.6 million, up from $285.2 million for last quarter.<br /><br />The shares are trading down about 22% this morning. We maintain our Sell recommendation on the shares.
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=ZION">Read the full analyst report on "ZION"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zion-gets-a-junk-rating-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mubadala bond sale may signal the return of corporate debt in the Gulf</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/mubadala-bond-sale-may-signal-the-return-of-corporate-debt-in-the-gulf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/mubadala-bond-sale-may-signal-the-return-of-corporate-debt-in-the-gulf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason G. Wulterkens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Frontier Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Dhabi government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Dhabi National Energy Company;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason g wulterkens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mubadala;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Bank Of Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sorouh Real Estate;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontiermarkets.wordpress.com/?p=597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mubadala, the state-owned investment vehicle of the Abu Dhabi government, will soon launch its first corporate bond sale&#8211;the latest sign that government companies are returning to the debt markets.  The fund plans a series of meetings with investors in Europe and the U.S., according to a report circulated among bankers at Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=frontiermarkets.wordpress.com&#38;blog=3702668&#38;post=597&#38;subd=frontiermarkets&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/mubadala-bond-sale-may-signal-the-return-of-corporate-debt-in-the-gulf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would You Be Interested in Earning a Steady 15% a Year?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/would-you-be-interested-in-earning-a-steady-15-a-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/would-you-be-interested-in-earning-a-steady-15-a-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank balance sheets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank crises;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buenos Aires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAX Global Russia+;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of the Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster insurance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy dominance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy need;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange Traded Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failed management;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[former senior bank regulator;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frederick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTSE 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTSE/Xinhua China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas resources;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graham Fisher & Co;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law School;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack McHugh;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Rosner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kass;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark-to-market accounting rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martin weiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meager oil;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSCI Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nouriel roubini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on-line publication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPIC;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shah Gilani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stansberry & Associates;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Peroulakis;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Dyson;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usa Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells fargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Black;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tr
strongNotes from thebr /
Investment Underground/strongbr /

/tr
tr
 April 9, 2009br /
Palermo Viejo, Buenos Aires, Argentina
pstrongWhy you should invest in pipeline companies… Wither Geither’s stress test results? Congress vs the Treasury… Check out of USA Inc with these four BRIC EFTs… How to survive the “Great Money Famine of 2009”… Three questions for Barney Frank… Congressional panel: Liquidate banks, fire top execs… PPIP FLOP… Geithner’s latest Orwellian manoeuvre… And more!/strong /p
pstrong*** We’ve added a new section to emNotes./embr /
/strongbr /
It’s called “Must Reads” and it’s basically a list of the day’s must read articles on money-making and the markets. It’s at the very bottom of the issue. Tell us what you think: a href="mailto:info@contrarianprofits.com" target="_blank"info@contrarianprofits.com./abr /
Don’t be shy. We’ve got thick skins./p
pstrong*** We love ema href="http://www.dailywealth.com"  class="alinks_links"DailyWealth/a./embr /
It’s quite possibly the single best free source#8230;/strong/p/tr]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/would-you-be-interested-in-earning-a-steady-15-a-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Centennial Communications Corp., AT&amp;T Inc., Allied Irish Banks, plc, The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland and Denbury Resources, Inc.  &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-centennial-communications-corp-att-inc-allied-irish-banks-plc-the-governor-and-company-of-the-bank-of-ireland-and-denbury-resources-inc-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-centennial-communications-corp-att-inc-allied-irish-banks-plc-the-governor-and-company-of-the-bank-of-ireland-and-denbury-resources-inc-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allied Irish Banks Plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank plan;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centennial Communications Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denbury resources inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated communications;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenihan;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puerto Rico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tertiary oil player;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/18992/Zacks+Analyst+Blog+Highlights%3A+Centennial+Communications+Corp.%2C+AT%26T+Inc.%2C+Allied+Irish+Banks%2C+plc%2C+The+Governor+and+Company+of+the+Bank+of+Ireland+and+Denbury+Resources%2C+Inc.++-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For Immediate Release 
<p align="left">Chicago, IL - April 9, 2009 - Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: <b>Centennial Communications Corp.</b> (<a onclick="quotepop('CYCL')" href="javascript:void(0)">CYCL</a>), <b>AT&#038;T Inc.</b> (<a onclick="quotepop('T')" href="javascript:void(0)">T</a>), <b>Allied Irish Banks, plc</b> (<a onclick="quotepop('AIB')" href="javascript:void(0)">AIB</a>), <b>The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland</b> (<a onclick="quotepop('IRE')" href="javascript:void(0)">IRE</a>) and <b>Denbury Resources, Inc.</b> (<a onclick="quotepop('DNR')" href="javascript:void(0)">DNR</a>). </p>
<p align="left">Get the most recent insight from Zacks Equity Research with the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=4579">http://at.zacks.com/?id=4579</a>. </p>
<p align="left">Here are highlights from Wednesday's Analyst Blog: </p>
<p align="left"><b>Centennial Reports, Kept a Hold</b> </p>
<p align="left">We maintain our Hold rating for <b>Centennial Communications Corp.</b> (<a onclick="quotepop('CYCL')" href="javascript:void(0)">CYCL</a>), a regional provider of wireless and integrated communications. The company's recent operational performance has been driven by solid growth in net income coupled with respectable subscriber additions across its wireless and broadband operations. </p>
<p align="left">CYCL recently received shareholders approval for the acquisition by <b>AT&#038;T Inc.</b> (<a onclick="quotepop('T')" href="javascript:void(0)">T</a>), the second largest wireless carrier in the U.S., for approximately $2.8 billion in cash and net debt, which includes cash to stockholders $8.50 per share. New initiatives in fiscal 2009, including network infrastructure upgrades in the U.S. and unlimited tariff plans in Puerto Rico, are expected to accelerate overall business performance. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Irish Banks Over a Cliff</b> </p>
<p align="left">Share prices at <b>Allied Irish Banks, plc</b> (<a onclick="quotepop('AIB')" href="javascript:void(0)">AIB</a>) and <b>The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland</b> (<a onclick="quotepop('IRE')" href="javascript:void(0)">IRE</a>) have plummeted, dropping almost 16% in morning trading, following release of the Irish government's bank plan and ratings downgrades by Moody's. </p>
<p align="left">The Irish government announced the establishment of a "bad bank," under which the government will purchase EUR80-90 billion ($107- $120 billion) of impaired property loans from Irish banks in exchange for government bonds. Critics pointed out that this amount is equivalent to 50% of Ireland's GDP, with Prime Minister Lenihan admitting that it could be 10 years before the debt might be repaid. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Denbury Resources a Buy to $24</b> </p>
<p align="left"><b>Denbury Resources, Inc.</b> (<a onclick="quotepop('DNR')" href="javascript:void(0)">DNR</a>) is a leading tertiary oil player, with a solid asset base and an impressive track record of production and reserve growth. We expect this growth momentum to continue over the next five years. </p>
<p align="left">Our continued favorable view of Denbury shares reflects the company's low risk profile and niche business model. In response to the commodity-price pullback and credit market issues, the company has reduced its capital budget to bring its projected outlays within operating cash flows. </p>
<p align="left"></p>
<p align="left">Want more from Zacks Equity Research? Subscribe to the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=2649">http://at.zacks.com/?id=2649</a>. </p>
<p align="left">About Zacks Equity Research </p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term. </p>
<p align="left">Continuous coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons. </p>
<p align="left">Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=2677">http://at.zacks.com/?id=2677</a> </p>
<p align="left"><b>About Zacks </b></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=4580">http://at.zacks.com/?id=4580</a>. </p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release. </p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security. </p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />Mark Vickery<br />Web Content Editor<br />312-265-9380<br />Visit: www.zacks.com<br /></p>
<p align="left"></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com" alt="Investment Research">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-centennial-communications-corp-att-inc-allied-irish-banks-plc-the-governor-and-company-of-the-bank-of-ireland-and-denbury-resources-inc-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody’s Downgrades Berkshire Hathaway</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moody%e2%80%99s-downgrades-berkshire-hathaway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moody%e2%80%99s-downgrades-berkshire-hathaway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Shepard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navivest.com/blog/2009/04/moodys-downgrades-berkshire-hathaway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thursday April 9, 2009
Navivest
 Berkshire and Hathaway (BRK-A) the holding company that’s majority owned by famed investor Warren Buffet, was downgraded by investment rating firm Moody’s (MCO) on...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my we...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/moody%e2%80%99s-downgrades-berkshire-hathaway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Irish Banks Over a Cliff &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/irish-banks-over-a-cliff-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/irish-banks-over-a-cliff-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlB;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allied Irish Bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allied Irish Banks Plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank financial strength ratings;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank plan;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank recapitalization plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog 
Share;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenihan;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/18959/Irish+Banks+Over+a+Cliff+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Share prices at <span style="font-weight: bold;">Allied Irish Banks, plc</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aib">AIB</a>) and <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ire">IRE</a>) have plummeted, dropping almost 16% in morning trading, following release of the Irish government's bank plan and ratings downgrades by Moody's.<br /><br />The Irish government announced the establishment of a "bad bank," under which the government will purchase EUR80-90 billion ($107- $120 billion) of impaired property loans from Irish banks in exchange for government bonds. Critics pointed out that this amount is equivalent to 50% of Ireland's GDP, with Prime Minister Lenihan admitting that it could be 10 years before the debt might be repaid.<br /><br />This is on top of the bank recapitalization plan, under which the Irish government is purchasing 25% stakes in Allied Irish Bank and the Bank of Ireland.<br /><br />In addition, Moody's downgraded the ratings of 12 Irish banks, including those of AIB and IRE. Moody's lowered the bank financial strength ratings on AlB and IRE to D from C, citing the likelihood of increased credit losses and erosion of capital adequacy.<br /><br />Prior to this, the bank shares had traded up from lows reached on March 5, 2009 when AIB traded at $0.76 and IRE hit $0.72. On Monday, AIB shares closed at $3.64 and IRE shares closed at $5.34.<br /><br />We currently have Hold recommendations on both AIB and IRE. The current Zacks rank for both AIB and IRE is 3, indicating no clear near-term directional pressure on share prices.<br /><br />(US$1 = EUR0.75)
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AIB">Read the full analyst report on "AIB"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=IRE">Read the full analyst report on "IRE"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/irish-banks-over-a-cliff-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Housing  Recovery Here We Come</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/contrarian-perspectives/housing-recovery-here-we-come/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/contrarian-perspectives/housing-recovery-here-we-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Investment U</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contrarian Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Horton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InvestmentU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pulte Homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real  estate default rates;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P Homebuilder;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPDR S&P Homebuilder Index ETF;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustained real estate recovery;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toll Brothers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/April/housing-recovery.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Housing  Recovery Here We Come
by The Investment U Research Team
It was rumored that market recovery wouldn’t occur until the  housing market turned itself around. For months it seemed a popular thing to  say.
And why not? It makes sense that in order for millions of  Americans to move forward, we needed to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/contrarian-perspectives/housing-recovery-here-we-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>G-20 Statement, Part 1 &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/g-20-statement-part-1-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/g-20-statement-part-1-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessional finance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Stability Board;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSF;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bank for Reconstruction and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oecd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade finance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/18835/+G-20+Statement%2C+Part+1+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The following is the text of the Statement from the Group of 20 summit.  I will translate and interpret it point by point.</p>
<p>1. We, the Leaders of the Group of Twenty, met in London on 2 April 2009.</p>
<p>2. We face the greatest challenge to the world economy in modern times; a crisis which has deepened since we last met, which affects the lives of women, men, and children in every country, and which all countries must join together to resolve. A global crisis requires a global solution.</p>
<p><em>Things stink all over due to this mess, and it has gotten worse lately.</em></p>
<p>3. We start from the belief that prosperity is indivisible; that growth, to be sustained, has to be shared; and that our global plan for recovery must have at its heart the needs and jobs of hard-working families, not just in developed countries but in emerging markets and the poorest countries of the world too; and must reflect the interests, not just of today's population, but of future generations too. We believe that the only sure foundation for sustainable globalization and rising prosperity for all is an open world economy based on market principles, effective regulation, and strong global institutions.</p>
<p><em>It would be nice if everybody could grow and get richer.  Lets not forget about the poor countries that have been hurt even more than the rich countries by this crisis, even though it was not their fault.  However, we will not fundamentally alter the overall global economic system.</em></p>
<p>4. We have today therefore pledged to do whatever is necessary to:</p>
<ul>
<li>restore confidence, growth, and jobs;</li>
<li>repair the financial system to restore lending;</li>
<li>strengthen financial regulation to rebuild trust;</li>
<li>fund and reform our international financial institutions to overcome this crisis and prevent future ones; promote global trade and investment and reject protectionism, to underpin prosperity; and</li>
<li>build an inclusive, green, and sustainable recovery. </li></ul>
<p>By acting together to fulfill these pledges we will bring the world economy out of recession and prevent a crisis like this from recurring in the future.</p>
<p><em>Nice set of goals.  However, what is meant by do "what ever is necessary" to repair the financial system.  Calls for stronger regulation of markets are good and very much needed.  The international financial institutions they are referring to here are the World Bank, the IMF and their regional counterparts.</em></p>
<p>5. The agreements we have reached today, to treble resources available to the IMF to $750 billion, to support a new SDR allocation of $250 billion, to support at least $100 billion of additional lending by the MDBs, to ensure $250 billion of support for trade finance, and to use the additional resources from agreed IMF gold sales for concessional finance for the poorest countries, constitute an additional $1.1 trillion programme of support to restore credit, growth and jobs in the world economy. Together with the measures we have each taken nationally, this constitutes a global plan for recovery on an unprecedented scale.</p>
<p><em>This is a major increase in support for the IMF and is a very useful step.  It actually means that the calls to help out the poor countries that are suffering from this are not just platitudes, but that the major countries of the world are actually prepared to help.</em></p>
<p><em>Restoring growth and jobs</em></p>
<p>6. We are undertaking an unprecedented and concerted fiscal expansion, which will save or create millions of jobs which would otherwise have been destroyed, and that will, by the end of next year, amount to $5 trillion, raise output by 4 per cent, and accelerate the transition to a green economy. We are committed to deliver the scale of sustained fiscal effort necessary to restore growth.</p>
<p><em>I will note that the vast bulk of that $5 trillion is coming from a handful of countries, most notably the U.S. and China, with honorable mentions to Japan and the U.K. Continental Europe is effectively trying to free ride off the increased aggregate demand from the countries that are actively stimulating their economies. I would however read this clause as an endorsement of the Obama Strategy. </em></p>
<p>7. Our central banks have also taken exceptional action. Interest rates have been cut aggressively in most countries, and our central banks have pledged to maintain expansionary policies for as long as needed and to use the full range of monetary policy instruments, including unconventional instruments, consistent with price stability.</p>
<p><em>A pat on the back for the central bankers.  This is an explicit endorsement of the use of Quantitative Easing (central banks buying long term government bonds and effectively printing money) which is being implemented by the Fed and the Bank of England.  I would also see this as a call for the European Central Bank (ECB) help out a bit more.</em></p>
<p>8. Our actions to restore growth cannot be effective until we restore domestic lending and international capital flows. We have provided significant and comprehensive support to our banking systems to provide liquidity, recapitalize financial institutions, and address decisively the problem of impaired assets. We are committed to take all necessary actions to restore the normal flow of credit through the financial system and ensure the soundness of systemically important institutions, implementing our policies in line with the agreed G20 framework for restoring lending and repairing the financial sector.</p>
<p><em>We have thrown lots of money at the banks to keep the system afloat and are prepared to continue throwing money at the banks.</em></p>
<p>9. Taken together, these actions will constitute the largest fiscal and monetary stimulus and the most comprehensive support programme for the financial sector in modern times. Acting together strengthens the impact and the exceptional policy actions announced so far must be implemented without delay. Today, we have further agreed over $1 trillion of additional resources for the world economy through our international financial institutions and trade finance.</p>
<p><em>Yes, it has been a lot of money we have thrown at the banks.  So far we have been helping out private commercial banks.  However given the scale of this problem we also need to significantly increase the resources of the IMF and World Bank (mostly IMF).</em></p>
<p>10. Last month the IMF estimated that world growth in real terms would resume and rise to over 2 percent by the end of 2010. We are confident that the actions we have agreed today, and our unshakeable commitment to work together to restore growth and jobs, while preserving long-term fiscal sustainability, will accelerate the return to trend growth. We commit today to taking whatever action is necessary to secure that outcome, and we call on the IMF to assess regularly the actions taken and the global actions required.</p>
<p><em>The sun will come out tomorrow.  We think this plan will work, but perhaps the IMF can give some progress reports from time to time.</em></p>
<p>11. We are resolved to ensure long-term fiscal sustainability and price stability and will put in place credible exit strategies from the measures that need to be taken now to support the financial sector and restore global demand. We are convinced that by implementing our agreed policies we will limit the longer-term costs to our economies, thereby reducing the scale of the fiscal consolidation necessary over the longer term.</p>
<p><em>We are sure we can pull back from the fiscal stimulus before it bankrupts us and from the monetary stimulus before hyperinflation breaks out.  You don't get to be a head of state by lacking in confidence, and this was a meeting of 20 heads of state or government.</em></p>
<p>12. We will conduct all our economic policies cooperatively and responsibly with regard to the impact on other countries and will refrain from competitive devaluation of our currencies and promote a stable and well-functioning international monetary system. We will support, now and in the future, to candid, even-handed, and independent IMF surveillance of our economies and financial sectors, of the impact of our policies on others, and of risks facing the global economy.</p>
<p><em>If the independent surveillance of the economy by the IMF applies to the U.S. then this is big news.  More likely there are no teeth to this.  If the U.S were any other country, the IMF would have long ago pressed us to nationalize the banks, clean them up and sell them off.</em></p>
<p><em>Strengthening financial supervision and regulation</em></p>
<p>13. Major failures in the financial sector and in financial regulation and supervision were fundamental causes of the crisis. Confidence will not be restored until we rebuild trust in our financial system. We will take action to build a stronger, more globally consistent, supervisory and regulatory framework for the future financial sector, which will support sustainable global growth and serve the needs of business and citizens.</p>
<p><em>Deregulation was a VERY bad idea when it comes to financial institutions.  With the world now interconnected more than ever before, regulations need to be strengthened and made more consistent across boarders.</em></p>
<p>14. We each agree to ensure our domestic regulatory systems are strong. But we also agree to establish the much greater consistency and systematic cooperation between countries, and the framework of internationally agreed high standards, that a global financial system requires. Strengthened regulation and supervision must promote propriety, integrity and transparency; guard against risk across the financial system; dampen rather than amplify the financial and economic cycle; reduce reliance on inappropriately risky sources of financing; and discourage excessive risk-taking. Regulators and supervisors must protect consumers and investors, support market discipline, avoid adverse impacts on other countries, reduce the scope for regulatory arbitrage, support competition and dynamism, and keep pace with innovation in the marketplace.</p>
<p><em>Everyone has to regulate, no trying to lure financial activity to your country by promising to look the other way when institutions take on excessive risk in the hunt for short term profits.</em></p>
<p>15. To this end we are implementing the Action Plan agreed at our last meeting, as set out in the attached progress report. We have today also issued a Declaration, Strengthening the Financial System. </p>
<p>In particular we agree:</p>
<ul>
<li>to establish a new Financial Stability Board (FSB) with a strengthened mandate, as a successor to the Financial Stability Forum (FSF), including all G20 countries, FSF members, Spain, and the European Commission;<br />that the FSB should collaborate with the IMF to provide early warning of macroeconomic and financial risks and the actions needed to address them;<br />to reshape our regulatory systems so that our authorities are able to identify and take account of macro-prudential risks;</li>
<li>to extend regulation and oversight to all systemically important financial institutions, instruments and markets. This will include, for the first time, systemically important hedge funds;</li>
<li>to endorse and implement the FSF's tough new principles on pay and compensation and to support sustainable compensation schemes and the corporate social responsibility of all firms;</li>
<li>to take action, once recovery is assured, to improve the quality, quantity, and international consistency of capital in the banking system. In future, regulation must prevent excessive leverage and require buffers of resources to be built up in good times;</li>
<li>to take action against non-cooperative jurisdictions, including tax havens. We stand ready to deploy sanctions to protect our public finances and financial systems. The era of banking secrecy is over. We note that the OECD has today published a list of countries assessed by the Global Forum against the international standard for exchange of tax information;</li>
<li>to call on the accounting standard setters to work urgently with supervisors and regulators to improve standards on valuation and provisioning and achieve a single set of high-quality global accounting standards; and<br />to extend regulatory oversight and registration to Credit Rating Agencies to ensure they meet the international code of good practice, particularly to prevent unacceptable conflicts of interest.</li></ul>
<p><em>That is a long list of reforms and areas for tighter supervision.  Mostly it amounts to more international cooperation on regulation, in a more formal and institutionalized way.  The call for regulation and oversight of the Credit Rating agencies (i.e. Moody's and S&#38;P) is long overdue, as their lack of action and incompetence was a major factor in this whole mess occurring.  All big financial institutions, including hedge funds need to be regulated.</em></p>
<p>16. We instruct our Finance Ministers to complete the implementation of these decisions in line with the timetable set out in the Action Plan. We have asked the FSB and the IMF to monitor progress, working with the Financial Action Taskforce and other relevant bodies, and to provide a report to the next meeting of our Finance Ministers in Scotland in November.</p>
<p><em>We hope we can get our act together by November.</em></p>
<p><em>That is about half of the statement, I will have a follow up post on the rest of it.  In general the basic thrust of the statement is that it endorses aggressive government actions, both on the fiscal and monetary front to address the crisis.  It calls for much stronger regulation.  Perhaps the most significant news is a very large commitment to strengthening the resources of the IMF to help some of the emerging economy's deal with the fallout of this mess that they did not create.</em></p>
<p></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/g-20-statement-part-1-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Investment News Briefs Friday, April 3, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/global-investment-news-briefs-friday-april-3-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/global-investment-news-briefs-friday-april-3-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celia Chen;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Machines Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santiago Gonzalez;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pFebruary Factory Orders Turn Positive; Fixed Mortgages at Record Low; GM Seeks Gov’t Money For Hybrids; Chile: Copper Prices Heading North; IBM Lowers Bid for Sun; Oil Surges 9% on Dollar Weakness/p
ul type="disc"
liU.S.       factory orders rose in February, a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE53142220090402"reversing       six months of consecutive declines/a, the Commerce Department said. New       factory orders rose 1.8% in February after dropping a revised 3.5% in       January, strongemReuters /em/strongreported./li
/ul
ul type="disc"
liThe       30-year fixed-mortgage rate a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087#38;sid=ayW7Zu26idSE#38;refer=home"dropped       to 4.78%/a, a 30-year low, as the U.S. Federal Reserve increases its       purchases of mortgage-backed bonds, strongemBloomberg /em/strongreported. “Lower rates will help increase demand for homes. We need to see stronger demand for homes to help end the housing correction,” Celia Chen, senior director at Moody’s Economy.com told strongemBloomberg/em/strong./li
/ul
ul type="disc"
liSeeking       funding to develop three#8230;/li/ul]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/global-investment-news-briefs-friday-april-3-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Crisis Is Just Starting to Hit the Headlines</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/contrarian-perspectives/this-crisis-is-just-starting-to-hit-the-headlines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/contrarian-perspectives/this-crisis-is-just-starting-to-hit-the-headlines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Wealth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contrarian Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bridgewater Associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital insurance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guaranteed investment products;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guaranteed return products;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larger real estate bubble;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance company capital levels;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance industry;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance stocks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln National;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate debt holdings;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:feeds.feedburner.com://0dc76ca19cb99c76aca93ffe85c817fb</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Dan Ferris, editor, Extreme Value/

Two recent headlines in the Wall Street Journal have confirmed my worst fears are coming true... much faster than I thought they would:

On Tuesday, the Journal ran a story called "Life Insurers Are Finding Their Fates Tied to Stocks." It confirmed what I told my subscribers in the latest issue of Extreme Value. Stock market losses might hit more than your equity portfolio...

Many life insurance companies sell variable annuities and other guaranteed return products. These products guarantee the investor will receive either a minimum return... or the gain in the S and P 500... whichever one is larger.

With the big stock indexes way down, losses have already piled up. The hedging that supports guaranteed investment products is too dense to get into here... But as the Journal pointed out on Tuesday, big life insurers like Lincoln National and Hartford have already suffered ratings downgrades due to investment losses and exposure to variable annuities. Moody's also said there's a risk of even greater losses.

But variable annuities aren't even the biggest problem. No one has quite caught on to the real issue yet...

Last week, the Wall Street Journal ran a story called "Commercial Property Faces Crisis." It reported default rates on $700 billion of commercial mortgage-backed securities could hit 30%, and noted that as many as 700 banks could fail as property loans go sour.

So what does all that have to do with life insurance companies? Everything...

The life insurance industry has put a lot of money into the commercial property market. Connecticut-based hedge fund Bridgewater Associates estimates 10% of the life insurance industry's investments are direct commitments to office buildings, shopping centers, and other commercial real estate projects.

Commercial real estate losses are rising rapidly. The delinquency rate on commercial mortgage-backed securities is already nearly as high as in the 1990s recession. Back then, the financial industry lost $48.5 billion on commercial real estate debt holdings.

The current commercial real estate crisis will certainly be much worse, due to the much larger real estate bubble this time around. The Journal reported U.S. banks could lose as much as $250 billion on commercial real estate. They're not the only ones.

As I explained last month, insurance companies are state regulated. Every state determines how much capital insurance companies have to keep on hand according to their financial strength and credit ratings.

As commercial real estate continues to collapse, life insurance companies won't have enough capital on hand. That will cripple their business... and their shares.

Take MetLife for example. MetLife has $36 billion worth of direct exposure to commercial real estate... and less than $19 billion of tangible equity. A 25% drop in the value of its commercial real estate holdings would cut tangible equity in half. That would crush the stock.

MetLife isn't alone. I've got my eye on 13 North American insurance companies. And all of them will take large writedowns due to commercial real estate and variable annuity exposures. At least one of them will fail over the next year.

I wish I were wrong about this. And I have nothing against any of the companies involved. Many are well run and, until now, had decent track records as good investors.

But they simply can't get out of the way. They're like giant hotels sitting on a sunny tropical shore... with an enormous tsunami headed straight for them.

Right now, it's time to go short on the biggest U.S. life insurance stocks. The next headline to look out for is the one that finally connects the dots, the one that tells you corporate-bond downgrades will result in permanent impairments to life insurance company capital levels.

Life insurance companies have even worse times ahead than what they've already endured. Investors who short now can spare themselves the pain.

Good investing,

Dandiv class="feedflare"
a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?a=poGnjjCgp5s:jLPHa-7OEPk:yIl2AUoC8zA"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?a=poGnjjCgp5s:jLPHa-7OEPk:7Q72WNTAKBA"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?a=poGnjjCgp5s:jLPHa-7OEPk:V_sGLiPBpWU"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?i=poGnjjCgp5s:jLPHa-7OEPk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?a=poGnjjCgp5s:jLPHa-7OEPk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?i=poGnjjCgp5s:jLPHa-7OEPk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?a=poGnjjCgp5s:jLPHa-7OEPk:TzevzKxY174"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?a=poGnjjCgp5s:jLPHa-7OEPk:69LSlcDtVW8"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?d=69LSlcDtVW8" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?a=poGnjjCgp5s:jLPHa-7OEPk:qj6IDK7rITs"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/dailywealth/rss?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/img/a
/divimg src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~r/dailywealth/rss/~4/poGnjjCgp5s" height="1" width="1"/]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/contrarian-perspectives/this-crisis-is-just-starting-to-hit-the-headlines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moody&#8217;s Cuts Slovakia&#8217;s Outlook</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/moodys-cuts-slovakias-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/moodys-cuts-slovakias-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon PowerShot S400 / IXUS 400 Digital Camera;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car manufacturing capacity;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas deliveries;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Claude Trichet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung 400PX 40 in. HDTV-Ready LCD TV;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovak Finance Ministry;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovak government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia's government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volkswagen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-4320465340253010796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: Barcelonabr /br /Now here's an interesting story. Slovakia has just joined the eurozone, a status most of the rest of the EU's East European members would badly like to attain. But just to remind us that joining the zone, while offering considerable support and protection in times of trouble, is no panacea, Moody's Investors Service have last Friday cut their outlook on Slovakia’s government bonds rating (to stable from positive, implying their is no likelihood of an upgrade in the near future, a possibility which was implicit in the earlier positive outlook).br /br /Moody's justify their decision on the grounds that future investment in Slovakia is at risk due to a combination of factors: the recession in the euro-region, the country’s dependence on the car industry and its falling competitiveness compared with other eastern European nations, many of whose currencies have fallen sharply during the crisis. In fact the Slovak Finance Ministry forecast only last Friday that foreign direct investment into Slovakia will be much lower this year than originally expected - with the Minister stating he expected a decline in FDI to 0.6 percent of gross domestic product in 2009, compared with a 2.7 percent forecast before the economic and financial crisis hit the country. br /br /br /The worrying thing for me about all this, is not the immediate short term pressure which Slovakia will undoubtedly be under due to the regional crisis, but rather the loss of competitiveness issue,  becuase it is ringing bells in my head about what previously happened in the case of Portugal (see a href="http://www.lse.co.uk/MacroEconomicNews.asp?ArticleCode=qr121yaaax2haxnArticleHeadline=slovak_finmin_cuts_2009_fdi_fcast_to_06_pct/gdp"my lengthy post on this here/a). The danger is that eurozone membership gets to be seen as a target you strive to achieve, and then relax into once it has been attained. The Southern Europe experience generally is not encouraging in this regard, and as they are finding out now, the hardest work begins after adopting the euro, since there is no currency left to devalue should loss of competitiveness prove severe.br /br /So I really do wish Jean Claude Trichet would exercise some of that famous "vigilance" on what to do about this issue too, since the long term future of the currency zone undoubtedly depends on getting this one right.br /br /In fact investors are already positioning themselves for a future weakening in the country's creditworthiness. Slovak five-year credit default swaps have been falling back recently, after hitting an all time high of 133.1 earlier in the month, according to CMA Datavision prices. (A basis point on a credit-default swap contract protecting 10 million euros of debt from default for five years is equivalent to 1,000 euros a year). br /br /But the spread on Slovak government bonds has also been rising (see chart below), and the spread with the 10 year government bond vis a vis the German equivalent was 136.7 on Friday. The chart presents a pretty preoccupying picture, since while bond spreads have all been under pressure since the onset of last October's crisis, it is unusual to see investors perceiving credit risk rising in a country which has only just joined the "gold-digger" club. And Friday's warning shot from Moody's needs to be understood in this context.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sc_dz0qimEI/AAAAAAAANTk/x5pYTdFOPf4/s1600-h/slovakia+bonds.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 195px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sc_dz0qimEI/AAAAAAAANTk/x5pYTdFOPf4/s400/slovakia+bonds.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5318713567327983682" //abr /br /br /The country has seen a huge increase in its car manufacturing capacity in recent years, fueling double-digit economic growth in the quarters before the financial crisis, but amid waning western European demand for Slovak-made cars - including brands Volkswagen, Audi  and Peugeot  - the country now faces a stalling economy and rising unemployment. Slovak unemployment data for February showed the jobless rate reaching its highest level in more than two years, rising to 9.7% from 9% in January. br /br /Over 75% of the country's EUR332 million stimulus has now been spent, largely giving tax breaks to low-wage earners to encourage them to reenter the work force, and with a fiscal deficit ceiling of 3% of GDP to defend, spending cuts rather than stimulus cannot be ruled out, since VAT returns are falling fast.br /br /So while Slovakia's total public debt only equals around 30% of GDP, pressure on the spread could increase if the country is forced to increase its borrowing. Slovakia only expects to need EUR 5 billion in borrowing this year, and EUR 2.5 billion has already been secured in the first few months of the year. br /br /strongStrong Economic Slowdown Underway/strongbr /br /The Slovak economy slowed further in the fourth quarter of last year with real GDP growing by 2.5 percent year on year. Whole year GDP for 2008 was 6.4 percent with total GDP reaching €67.33 billion. Economic growth had been 6.6 percent in the third quarter, and while there is no official data for seasonally adjusted quarter on quarter growth, I estimate the economy may well have contracted by around 1.5%. br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrGsHai7VI/AAAAAAAANC0/uCP75wGY8n0/s1600-h/slovakia+GDP.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 209px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrGsHai7VI/AAAAAAAANC0/uCP75wGY8n0/s400/slovakia+GDP.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312777171643854162" //abr /br /Part of the problem is the drop in export demand for Slovakia's car driven economy, and the country posted a trade deficit in January, as drop in demand was made worse by the suspension of gas deliveries from Russia. Exports slumped 29.9 percent on the year in January, the fourth consecutive monthly decline, and the biggest drop at least since 2006 when the statistics office began compiling data under the current methodology. Imports were down 22.4 percent. br /br /The trade deficit totalled 279.5 million euros ($361 million), following a revised deficit of 341.6 million euros in December. Slovakia posted a trade surplus of 42.3 million euros in January 2008. br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbqfcLPdzDI/AAAAAAAANCM/K40ooxi7G3o/s1600-h/slovakia+exports.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 234px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbqfcLPdzDI/AAAAAAAANCM/K40ooxi7G3o/s400/slovakia+exports.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312734016839732274" //abr /br /The drop in the demand for exports has obviously hit industrial production which decreased by 27 % year-on-year in January reach the biggest drop since the statistics office began compiling data in 1999. Manufacturing output fell 32,7 %.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sbqfg9U0jbI/AAAAAAAANCU/Ts7I1BtMGok/s1600-h/slovakia+IP.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 230px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sbqfg9U0jbI/AAAAAAAANCU/Ts7I1BtMGok/s400/slovakia+IP.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312734099003444658" //abr /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sc_PCQTVDHI/AAAAAAAANTc/q6NI2BRIsYQ/s1600-h/slovakia+industrial+output.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 227px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sc_PCQTVDHI/AAAAAAAANTc/q6NI2BRIsYQ/s400/slovakia+industrial+output.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5318697322590571634" //abr /br /br /Construction output was also down sharply in January, falling by 25.6% year on year, although seasonal factors can obviously be playing a part here.br /br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sc_OmrkTSzI/AAAAAAAANTU/nOJunWOX-8A/s1600-h/slovakia+construction+2.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 231px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sc_OmrkTSzI/AAAAAAAANTU/nOJunWOX-8A/s400/slovakia+construction+2.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5318696848873179954" //abr /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sc_Oes3MdvI/AAAAAAAANTM/2r320YxCzDI/s1600-h/slovakia+construction+one.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 230px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sc_Oes3MdvI/AAAAAAAANTM/2r320YxCzDI/s400/slovakia+construction+one.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5318696711781906162" //abr /br /Slovak retail sales fell by 3.3% year on year and totalled €1.3bn in January 2009. The largest contributing factor to this overall decrease was from the category of ‘other household goods in specialised shops’ retail which dropped by 24%. In addition sales of fuels ‘in specialised shops’ retail (15.6%) and the category of ‘retail sales realised not in stores’ (4.8%) experienced significant drops. Retail sales of electronics fell sharply (42.5%), and drops were also witnessed in the categories of: ‘food in specialised shops’ (15.8%); recreation and entertainment (12.7%); other goods in specialised shops retail (5.9%); and retail in non-specialised shops (4.5%).br /br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sc_e6Mfl4FI/AAAAAAAANT0/lRlW96XRePA/s1600-h/slovakia+retail+two.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 206px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sc_e6Mfl4FI/AAAAAAAANT0/lRlW96XRePA/s400/slovakia+retail+two.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5318714776315355218" //abr /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sc_e177VKUI/AAAAAAAANTs/wE6rSEDl_bc/s1600-h/slovakia+retail+one.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 227px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sc_e177VKUI/AAAAAAAANTs/wE6rSEDl_bc/s400/slovakia+retail+one.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5318714703148820802" //abr /br /br /strongWorry Now, So As Not To Pay The Price Later/strongbr /br /In the short term the Moody's decsion really  doesn't mean that much, since Slovakia only had 28.6% (of GDP) in gross debt in 2008, but it is the mid and longer term dynamic we need to think about. Slovakia is about to issue a 2-year zero-coupon bond for an unspecified amount today, but the government debt agency is unlikely to have problems. However, as we have already seen in the cases of Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Spain, simply becoming a member of the eurozone is not a guarantee of anything in economic performance terms (although it does provide almost automatic protection from short term balance of payments crises). So it is important that Slovakia takes the appropriate measures to restore competitiveness now, otherwise we could see the horrifying spectacle of the eurozone's newest member steadily moving over to stand alongside countries like Greece, hovering around near the exit door, struggling desperately to avoid being rocketed out.div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/8991369883287712098-4320465340253010796?l=globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/moodys-cuts-slovakias-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recession-Proof Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/recession-proof-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/recession-proof-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eldon Mast</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good News Economist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1227919517269937208.post-2119299398316769992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pa href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/1zDOa86R-s3ojYe0z5k-GezKARI/a"img src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/1zDOa86R-s3ojYe0z5k-GezKARI/i" border="0" ismap="true"/img/a/pDespite the news of job losses and unemployment numbers, there is indeed a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);" href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/01/estimate-top-us-firms-have-over-700000.html"strong employment opportunity/a in selected in parts of this economy.  In fact several industry segments have actually continued to add jobs throughout this whole recession.  Indeed thea style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);" href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/03/monster-employment-index-up.html" jobs data shows bright spots/a — expanding industries that promise new, stable career opportunities.br /br /•Health care. Hiring has continued non-stop at hospital, medical clinics and doctors' offices. Jobs in demand: nurses, lab technicians, physician assistants.br /br /•Government. Cities, counties and school districts continue to a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);" href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/01/help-wanted-jobs-jobs-and-more-jobs.html"add a great number of jobs/a -- seven times as many as the federal government. Jobs in demand: educators, police, firefighters and workers connected to infrastructure such as roads.br /br /• Energy. Oil, gas, coal and electricity production have kept adding jobs, although the pace has slowed since energy prices declined last year. City utility jobs have also continued to increase.br /br /According to a href="http://www.bls.gov/jlt/"BLS data/a, about 4.4 million people got hired into new jobs in January, and 3 million more openings were available.  Granted, those numbers are down sharply from the start of the recession, but don't let anyone tell you there are "no jobs."br /br /More broadly these charts show the last several year's actual job growth and Moody's a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-02-06-new-jobs-growth-graphic_N.htm"Economy.com's forecasted job growth/a for 2009-12.br /br /With a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);" href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/03/corporate-layoffs-subsiding.html"corporations scaling back their layoffs/a significantly, you can see from the charts when those companies actually begin to contribute to renewed job growth again.br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_jlRX6zR7UgM/Scw1FUrGOzI/AAAAAAAAAUs/nD4NZ_D81AE/s1600-h/jobs_segments.png"img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: center; cursor: pointer; width: 303px; height: 318px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_jlRX6zR7UgM/Scw1FUrGOzI/AAAAAAAAAUs/nD4NZ_D81AE/s320/jobs_segments.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5317683625582803762" border="0" //abr /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_jlRX6zR7UgM/Scw1Fm71AbI/AAAAAAAAAU8/mLN2p4snIow/s1600-h/jobs_totals.jpg"img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: center; cursor: pointer; width: 310px; height: 288px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_jlRX6zR7UgM/Scw1Fm71AbI/AAAAAAAAAU8/mLN2p4snIow/s320/jobs_totals.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5317683630484816306" border="0" //abr /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jlRX6zR7UgM/Scw1FqDQHyI/AAAAAAAAAU0/ieHPHmeTM8Y/s1600-h/jobs_percent.png"img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: center; cursor: pointer; width: 307px; height: 270px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jlRX6zR7UgM/Scw1FqDQHyI/AAAAAAAAAU0/ieHPHmeTM8Y/s320/jobs_percent.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5317683631321259810" border="0" //adiv class="blogger-post-footer"div/div
No Gloom here.  Only Good News.
div/div
a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1416560610?ie=UTF8tag=thegooneweco-20linkCode=as2camp=1789creative=9325creativeASIN=1416560610"The Power of Positive Thinking/a
div/div
a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0743243153?ie=UTF8tag=thegooneweco-20linkCode=as2camp=1789creative=390957creativeASIN=0743243153"The Road Less Traveled/a
div/divimg width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/1227919517269937208-2119299398316769992?l=mast-economy.blogspot.com'//divdiv class="feedflare"
a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:yIl2AUoC8zA"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:63t7Ie-LG7Y"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=63t7Ie-LG7Y" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:dnMXMwOfBR0"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:F7zBnMyn0Lo"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?i=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:7Q72WNTAKBA"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:V_sGLiPBpWU"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?i=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:qj6IDK7rITs"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:KwTdNBX3Jqk"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?i=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:l6gmwiTKsz0"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:gIN9vFwOqvQ"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?i=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=5j-5GG6LEb8:uKW8m8UDV-k:TzevzKxY174"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"/img/a
/divimg src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~r/TheGoodNewsEconomist/~4/5j-5GG6LEb8" height="1" width="1"/]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/recession-proof-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expert Reactions to Geithner Plan:  Net Positive</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/expert-reactions-to-geithner-plan-net-positive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/expert-reactions-to-geithner-plan-net-positive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eldon Mast</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank liquidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad DeLong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irvine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Kyser;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Burns;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Gapper;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Thoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zandi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Herald;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Spence;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Anderson;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good News Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Berkeley;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells fargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1227919517269937208.post-9090174319472455488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pa href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/O-tZmZdhmyXoelNcUEPFbFLjCmo/a"img src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/O-tZmZdhmyXoelNcUEPFbFLjCmo/i" border="0" ismap="true"/img/a/pYesterday you read one scenario for a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);" href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/03/how-toxic-assets-turn-to-gold.html"toxic asset appreciation/a over time.  That would spell good news for big bank liquidity in the short term and good news for private investors and taxpayer equity gains in the long run.br /br /You may have heard that not all economists agree on the efficacy of the plan.  But there were surprisingly many positive comments on the the government's new roadmap:br /br /From Mark Thoma in the Economist's View's article a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/03/which-bailout-plan-is-best.html"Which Bailout Plan is Best?/a, "I am willing to get behind this plan and to try to make it work. It wasn't my first choice... but like it or not this is the plan we are going with and the important thing now is to do the best that we can to try and make it work."br /br /Scott Anderson, senior economist at Wells Fargo said, "My gut reaction is that this is an excellent plan. This plan will go a long way toward getting banks in better position to lend more aggressively and break the deleveraging feedback loop that is now in place."br /br /From the a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/03/some-positive-comments-on-geithner.html"Calculated Risk Blog/a (usually a quite negative read), "It is probably the best we can get in the current environment."br /br /John Burns, real estate consultant, Irvine, "This plan is very smart.  It will cause an economic rebound much sooner than would otherwise have occurred."br /br /Jack Kyser, chief economist, Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp., "It should help get the [big] banks lending again, which is very important to our small-to-medium sized business community."br /br /Mark Zandi of Moody's Economy.com, a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/962778.html" target="new" class="link"wrote in the Miami Herald/a that, "This plan has a good chance of success."br /br /UC Berkeley's Brad DeLong wrote on a href="http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/03/i-think-paul-krugman-is-wrong.html" target="new" class="link"his blog/a that the plan is a "positive step" that lets the government shoulder the risk. DeLong emphasizes that the US treasury is much more risk-tolerant than private firms.br /br /John Gapper from The Financial Times offers, "a href="http://blogs.ft.com/gapperblog/2009/03/two-cheers-for-tim-geithners-bad-assets-plan/"Two cheers for Tim Geithner’s bad assets plan./a"br /br /The plan to cleanse banks of toxic assets "has a good chance of succeeding," says A. a href="http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Michael+Spenceamp;site=wnewsamp;client=wnewsamp;proxystylesheet=wnewsamp;output=xml_no_dtdamp;ie=UTF-8amp;oe=UTF-8amp;filter=pamp;getfields=wnnisamp;sort=date:D:S:d1" onmouseover="return escape( popwSearchNews( this ))"Michael Spence/a, co-winner of the 2001 Nobel Prize in economics.br /br /The plan obviously has its naysayers.  And the mainstream media was parading them out yesterday. (You can read about them elsewhere).  But it is quite interesting to note the overwhelming support to try to make this plan work -- even from many of the "perma gloomsters." br /br /So with a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);" href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/03/consumer-confidence-makes-up-huge.html"consumer confidence now spiking higher/a by the day, some additional a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);" href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/03/san-francisco-housing-market-instantly.html"good news on the housing market/a, and increased investor confidence in a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);" href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/03/wessel-on-fix.html"big bank future fundamentals/a, this first full week of spring just may be a positive precursor to a much a style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);" href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/02/bull-market-move-swift-and-steep.html"warmer summer stock market/aspan style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);"./spandiv class="blogger-post-footer"div/div
No Gloom here.  Only Good News.
div/div
a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1416560610?ie=UTF8tag=thegooneweco-20linkCode=as2camp=1789creative=9325creativeASIN=1416560610"The Power of Positive Thinking/a
div/div
a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0743243153?ie=UTF8tag=thegooneweco-20linkCode=as2camp=1789creative=390957creativeASIN=0743243153"The Road Less Traveled/a
div/divimg width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/1227919517269937208-9090174319472455488?l=mast-economy.blogspot.com'//divdiv class="feedflare"
a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:yIl2AUoC8zA"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:63t7Ie-LG7Y"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=63t7Ie-LG7Y" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:dnMXMwOfBR0"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?i=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:7Q72WNTAKBA"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:V_sGLiPBpWU"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?i=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:qj6IDK7rITs"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:KwTdNBX3Jqk"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?i=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:l6gmwiTKsz0"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:gIN9vFwOqvQ"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?i=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?a=p0rwJDnb62Q:gLW9Hl5Slz0:TzevzKxY174"img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~ff/TheGoodNewsEconomist?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"/img/a
/divimg src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~r/TheGoodNewsEconomist/~4/p0rwJDnb62Q" height="1" width="1"/]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/expert-reactions-to-geithner-plan-net-positive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do They Have Parachutes In Bulgaria?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/do-they-have-parachutes-in-bulgaria/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/do-they-have-parachutes-in-bulgaria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgarian National Bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgarian National Radio;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon PowerShot S400 / IXUS 400 Digital Camera;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit ratings agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czech Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBRD;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency projects;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food processing industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign parent banks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute for International Finance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intra-bank lending;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Orchard;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal goods;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Statistical Institute;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Statistics Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Statistics Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nett bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-food sales;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-metal goods;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung 400PX 40 in. HDTV-Ready LCD TV;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergey Stanishev;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mirow;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-2346065236807192211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: Barcelonabr /br /With capital inflows to the CEE economies slowing to a trickle in Eastern Europe, a sharp correction is now underway in most countries' external imbalances and in particular in their current-account deficits. For the CEE-6 (Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey), net private capital flows are forecast to slow to $59.5 billion in 2009, down from an estimated $161.9 billion in 2008, according to estimates from the Institute For International Finance. The basic concern is that those countries with significant external deficits are extremely vulnerable to foreign capital reversals, especially in the current environment of global credit tightening.br /br /br /FDI flows (which are generally considered more stable and less susceptible to rapid outflows than other capital flows) have been the main form of financing for current-account deficits in recent years, but such inflows are set to slow sharply in 2009. The Economist estimates that between 2003 and 20007 FDI inflows (on average) covered almost 100% of the current-account deficit in the ten EU member states. In 2008, this coverage fell to an estimated 55%br /br /As FDI has fallen back, debt - particularly intra-bank lending - has become the main financing vehicle for the current-account deficits.  Nevertheless, intra-bank lending – that is, lending between foreign parent banks and their subsidiaries in the region – is falling back sharply in 2009, with  nett bank lending to emerging Europe, excluding Russia, being projected at around $22 bn in 2009, down from $95 bn in 2008 (according to the Institute for International Finance)br /br /Now the central issue is that such corrections in external imbalances can take pplace in one of two ways - either domestic demand drops sharply and/or the currencies weaken significantly. In the case of those countries with an exchange rate peg the second route is not open, hence what we are likely to see is a very sharp contraction. Such contractions are already evident in the Baltics, but what about Bulgaria. How sharp will the correction in Bulgaria be? Only today capital economics have come in with a forecast of 5% contraction over the year. But how realistic is this, let's look at some data.br /br /br /Well, we could start with this little deatil: retail sales down 25.7% month-on-month in January, according to the national statistics office. For an economy which has been driven by a consumer borrowing and lending boom, that looks like dramatic evidence of some kind. It looks like dramatic evidence, but it isn't really quite so dramatic as it appears at first sight, and the first warning I would issue to anyone who wants to study the Bulgarian economy is never to believe anything you see at first sight.br /br /The data came from a Bulgarian press source (see extract below), but they evidently had no idea what they were talking about, since they confused the basics of year on year and month on month, and obviously non seasonally adjusted sales are down massively January over December, every year. Actually according to Eurostat, seasonally corrected sales were down only 0.15% month on month, and were even still up 4.79% year on year, although this is still a very large drop from the 20% rate of increase registered earlier in the year. So the basic point would seem to hold, that Bulgaria's economy is now in freefall, but I have learnt something: never, ever, cite material from direct Bulgarian sources without checking.br /br /blockquoteRetail sales revenue in Bulgaria declined by 25.7% in January from the same month of last year, the National Statistical Institute (wwwo.nsi.bg) said in a statement. The slump was attributed to a sharp decrease in retail sales of larger consumer goods, although a decline is normal for the beginning of each year. A major 31.5% drop was reported in sales of vehicles and technical maintenance. Revenue generated by non-food sales went up by 3.0% year-on-year, the data showed. Revenue from food, beverages and cigarettes sales showed a minor increase of 0.5%/blockquotebr /br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScTjk_QxfEI/AAAAAAAANK8/jf3e6HC7T7c/s1600-h/bulgaria+retail+sales+one.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5315623684800609346" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 203px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScTjk_QxfEI/AAAAAAAANK8/jf3e6HC7T7c/s400/bulgaria+retail+sales+one.png" border="0" //abr /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScTjgTgDXKI/AAAAAAAANK0/97roK0o3zZw/s1600-h/bulgaria+retail+sales+2.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5315623604334058658" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 206px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScTjgTgDXKI/AAAAAAAANK0/97roK0o3zZw/s400/bulgaria+retail+sales+2.png" border="0" //a!--more--br /br /So there is evidence of a sharp slowdown in retail sales, but at present that is all it is, a slowdown. So what about the rest of the economy? Well, if we come to look at industrial output, the situation is a lot clearer, since production is falling rapidly.br /br /blockquoteBulgaria's industrial output fell by 19% in January 2009 month-on-month, after rising by a monthly 1.7% in December, preliminary data of the National Statistics Institute (NSI) showed on Tuesday. This is the fourth drop in a row, causing the index to go below the 2006 levels. The industrial output index is mainly determined by the indicators of the processing industry, which dropped by 21,4% in January, compared to December 2008. There is a 66,5% decrease in the production of metal goods, excluding machines and appliances. In the production of non-metal goods the drop is by 42,1%, and in the food processing industry by 24,8%./blockquotebr /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScS0-6GKSPI/AAAAAAAANKc/lmDbYy2ux04/s1600-h/bulgraia+IP.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5315572453044013298" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 203px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScS0-6GKSPI/AAAAAAAANKc/lmDbYy2ux04/s400/bulgraia+IP.png" border="0" //abr /br /As can be seen in the chart below, the output index is now somewhere round the level of summer 2006, and falling.br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScS06YmpvCI/AAAAAAAANKU/oLb8ysjjHxY/s1600-h/bulgaria+IP+2.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5315572375334009890" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 203px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScS06YmpvCI/AAAAAAAANKU/oLb8ysjjHxY/s400/bulgaria+IP+2.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /Construction is also falling, and has been slowing all through 2008.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScT4eo7KXlI/AAAAAAAANLM/8C059TZYeqk/s1600-h/bulgaria+construction+one.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5315646665469353554" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 205px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScT4eo7KXlI/AAAAAAAANLM/8C059TZYeqk/s400/bulgaria+construction+one.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScT4Zth1QxI/AAAAAAAANLE/fMzyF8uAWFg/s1600-h/bulgaria+construction+two.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5315646580805944082" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 205px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScT4Zth1QxI/AAAAAAAANLE/fMzyF8uAWFg/s400/bulgaria+construction+two.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /strongUnemployment Rising and GDP Slipping Back/strongbr /br /Bulgaria's unemployment rate has not spiked dramatically upward yet, but it is continuing to rise, and was up for the fifth consecutive month in a row in February, with 248,000 Bulgarians registering as unemployed, up by 7,000 over January. The average jobless rate for Bulgaria is now 6.69%, up by 0.9% since September.br /br /And while Bulgaria's gross domestic product still strongseems/strong to be growing, it was at the very best a close shave in Q4 2008 grew, since the economy grew by a preliminary 3,5% year on year, down from the 6.8% rate registered in the previous quarter. This is sharp enough to mean that the economy may actally have contracted on a seasonally adjusted quarter on quarter basis, but since the statistics office don't publish this level fo data we simply don't know (that is, an educated guess would be that it did contract, but I certainly couldn't swear to the fact).br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScT8tpiudNI/AAAAAAAANLU/pXXUmiSvfd8/s1600-h/bulgaria+GDP.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5315651321379845330" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 203px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScT8tpiudNI/AAAAAAAANLU/pXXUmiSvfd8/s400/bulgaria+GDP.png" border="0" //abr /br /strongSharp Current Account Contraction/strongbr /br /According to the Bulgarian National Bank last week Bulgaria's current account deficit was EUR 439.7 M in January 2009, down from EUR 806.8 M in January 2008.br /br /blockquotePM Sergey Stanishev said "the country's deficit has begun rapidly shrinking which means that the economy has unsurprisingly slowed down," Bulgarian National Radio reported./blockquotebr /br /The current and capital account deficit was EUR 288.7 M in January compared to EUR 806.2 M recorded in the previous year.And January's trade deficit was EUR 339.3 M, narrowing from EUR 607.8 million in 2008. All this is consistent with a very sharp and rapid contraction of the economy, as imports collapse and fund flows dry up, rather than any positive news on exports. Exports fell by 27.2% to EUR 811.8 billion in January, while imports dropped by 33.2% to EUR 1.1 billion.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScTc5aXs3fI/AAAAAAAANKs/zyOHj9_YTlY/s1600-h/bulgaria+ca+deficit.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5315616339093413362" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 226px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScTc5aXs3fI/AAAAAAAANKs/zyOHj9_YTlY/s400/bulgaria+ca+deficit.png" border="0" //abr /br /strongInflation Still A Problem/strongbr /br /Bulgarian inflation slowed again in February for the eighth consecutive month and hit 6 percent - down from the 7.1 percent registered in January, but prices are still rising far too fast for an economy which is slowing rapidly. Consumer prices gained 0.1 percent in the month.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScUQLCNzQ3I/AAAAAAAANLk/P8O8yLRa1VQ/s1600-h/bulgaria+CPI+1.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5315672716940100466" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 233px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScUQLCNzQ3I/AAAAAAAANLk/P8O8yLRa1VQ/s400/bulgaria+CPI+1.png" border="0" //abr /br /And the core index - taking out food, energy, alchohol and tobacco - has almost stopped rising but has yet to fall. So we have had a significant period of price deflation, but we have yet to see price reductions, and these of course, as in the case of the Baltics, are vital for a country operating a currency peg which has seen a substantial loss in competitiveness.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScUQDejeIDI/AAAAAAAANLc/Owjiofxwq7o/s1600-h/bulgaria+CPI+2.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5315672587108229170" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 231px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScUQDejeIDI/AAAAAAAANLc/Owjiofxwq7o/s400/bulgaria+CPI+2.png" border="0" //abr /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScVj6Nu_jQI/AAAAAAAANLs/-b8RGy_nK2E/s1600-h/bulgaria+reer.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5315764786951064834" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 232px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ScVj6Nu_jQI/AAAAAAAANLs/-b8RGy_nK2E/s400/bulgaria+reer.png" border="0" //abr /br /strongMoody's Review/strongbr /br /The credit ratings agency Moody's this week affirmed Bulgaria's Baa3 local and foreign currency ratings, with a stable outlook, but said that Bulgaria's economy faced tough times this year.br /br /blockquote"Bulgaria is likely to experience a difficult recession in 2009 as the economy suffers from shrinking exports and slowing inflows of foreign capital," Moody's sovereign risk group analyst Kenneth Orchard said in a statement. "Nevertheless, many years of prudent fiscal policy and low debt mean that the government is well positioned to cope with the situation."/blockquotebr /br /Having averaged Budget surpluses of 2.7 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) since 2004, the Cabinet has strengthened its financial position, but the main threat did not come from the Government debt, which was a very low 14 per cent of GDP. Moody's argued Bulgaria's most pressing problem comes from the large quantity of private sector debt that has been accumulated and needs refinancing in 2009. Short-term external debt totalled around 13 billion euro at the end of 2008, which is equivalent to 40 per cent of GDP. Much of this debt is likely to be rolled over, but automatic re-financing can no longer be assumed in the current financial environment. The low Government debt is seen as a safety net, because it allows Bulgaria (like Latvia) to borrow funds to support the private sector and the currency board without immediately threatening the government's creditworthiness. The debt-to-GDP ratio could rise and still remain well below the EU average, according to Moody's.br /br /And as if to prove Moody's point Bulgaria announced during the week that it was going to borrow a further 50 million euros from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development in 2009 than it did in 2008, in order to cope with the impact of the global financial crisis. Half of the 250 million euros total 2009 borrowing will go to local banks to spur corporate borrowing, EBRD President Thomas Mirow said. The rest will go toward energy efficiency projects, municipalities and direct lending to “sound companies.”br /br /So, to return to the start of this post, and the correction in the external imbalance, I would say there is plenty of evidence building up now that this is taking place, and that the process is starting to hurt. In which case I think the 5% GDP contraction Capital Economics forecast not only looks realistic, there seems to be significant downside risk attached to it.div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/8991369883287712098-2346065236807192211?l=globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/do-they-have-parachutes-in-bulgaria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slovenia&#8217;s Economy Falls Off The Roof, While Slovakia Slides Into Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/slovenias-economy-falls-off-the-roof-while-slovakia-slides-into-recession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/slovenias-economy-falls-off-the-roof-while-slovakia-slides-into-recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[//abr /br /Slovakia's government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkelbr;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billion-euro bank guarantee plan;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon PowerShot S400 / IXUS 400 Digital Camera;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas deliveries;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Shearing;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pociatek;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preliminary gross domestic product;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung 400PX 40 in. HDTV-Ready LCD TV;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sario;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovak government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenian government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state investment agency;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Europe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-3825561050246228560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: Barcelonabr /br /br /blockquote"Most other countries in the region are faring much better, though....Like Slovenia, which joined two years ago, Slovakia can enjoy the full protection of rich Europe’s currency union, rather than just the indirect benefit of being due to join it some day."br /The Economistbr /br /“Saying that the situation is the same for all central and eastern European states, I don’t see that……you cannot compare the dire situation in Hungary with that of other countries.”br /Angela Merkelbr /br /“Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way”br /Tolstoy/blockquotebr /br /With Slovakia going to the polls today to elect a new president, I thought this might be a good moment to examine how the two East European economies which have recently enetered the eurozone are getting on in the current crisis. None too well, would be my tentative reply.br /br /br /Slovenia’s economy contracted for the first time in more than 15 years in the fourth quarter of 2008,  and is almost certainly heading for quite a deep recession as a construction boom came to an end while demand dropped for exports to other economies in the European Union.  Gross domestic product shrank  0.8 percent year on year following a revised 3.9 percent expansion in the previous quarter. More astonishingly, quarter on quarter GDP contracted a seasonally adjusted 4.1 percent. Only Estonia and Latvia contracted at a faster rate.br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrL_-fK4cI/AAAAAAAANDE/T3ifids4VmQ/s1600-h/slovenia+GDP.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 260px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrL_-fK4cI/AAAAAAAANDE/T3ifids4VmQ/s400/slovenia+GDP.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312783010402853314" //abr /br /Goods exports were down by 9.4 percent, while goods imports fell by 7.3 percent. The positive growth services exports meant that total exports decreased less than total imports, and consequently the external trade balance contributed positively to the GDP growth (0.6 percentage points). br /br /Gross fixed capital formation decreased sharply year on year (by 5.3 percent), having grown by 16,9 percent in the first quarter of 2008, and the fall back was undoubtedly the main factor behind the shock shrinkage. Negative growth was recorded in both construction investment (-5.5 percent) and  in machinery and equipment (-6.1 percent). br /blockquotebr /“Slovenia can’t escape the sharp downturn in western Europe, and Germany in particular, so recession now seems inevitable,” according to Neil Shearing, an emerging markets economist at Capital Economics in London. /blockquotebr /br /Obviously the economic performance of Slovenia - the first new EU member to adopt the euro in 2007 - will be closely watched during this recession, to see how euro membership actually affects performance.  The Slovenian government forecast GDP growth to contract at 2 percent in 2009, but since this slowdown has come on so rapidly, it is hard to say much with certainty at this point.br /br /Slovenia’s  economy expanded in 2007 at the fastest pace since the country gained independence in 1991, with GDP increasing by 6.8 percent, driven largely by construction activity and investment. br /br /The economy was maintained largely by a sharp acceleration in government spending which was up 5 percent year on year in the last quarter.br /br /This problem seems to be an accelerated pass through of the financial crisis into other sectors of the economy with the biggest impact being felt in exports and construction investments.  The Slovenian government have introduced a 12 billion-euro bank guarantee plan (amounting to nearly one third of the country's 35 billion euro GDP), together with subsidies for shorter work time and the sale of government bonds in an attempt to restart bank lending. br /br /Industrial output and exports seem both to be very badly affected, and according to seasonally adjusted data industrial production last December was down by 4.1% over November, while year on year it decreased by 22.1%. Manufacturing output was down by 4.2% on the month and 22.2% year on year. br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbqyL38P23I/AAAAAAAANCk/Y_kDXTUVb2w/s1600-h/slovenia+IP.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 225px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbqyL38P23I/AAAAAAAANCk/Y_kDXTUVb2w/s400/slovenia+IP.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312754627501874034" //abr /br /Construction activity has been very badly hit, and in January 2009 fell by 20.7% on the year. New buildings decreased by 29.8% while civil engineering only fell by 10.2%, reflecting the impact of government counter cyclical spending. br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sbq0HlbCkfI/AAAAAAAANCs/nG5IxpigGPY/s1600-h/slovenia+construction.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 226px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sbq0HlbCkfI/AAAAAAAANCs/nG5IxpigGPY/s400/slovenia+construction.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312756752834531826" //abr /br /br /Slovenia had an estimated  fiscal deficit of 1% of GDP in 2008, but the EU Commission now forecasts this will reach 3.2% in 2009, and if the economy contracts more sharply than expected (the Commission is expecting positive growth of 0.6%) this may well be somewhat larger.br /br /strongSlovakia's GDP Drops Sharply/strongbr /br /The Slovak economy slowed further in the fourth quarter of last year with real GDP growing by 2.5 percent year on year. Whole year GDP for 2008 was 6.4 percent with total GDP reaching €67.33 billion. Economic growth had been 6.6 percent in the third quarter, and while there is no official data for seasonally adjusted quarter on quarter growth, I estimate the economy may well have contracted by around 1.5%. br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrGsHai7VI/AAAAAAAANC0/uCP75wGY8n0/s1600-h/slovakia+GDP.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 209px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrGsHai7VI/AAAAAAAANC0/uCP75wGY8n0/s400/slovakia+GDP.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312777171643854162" //abr /br /br /Part of the problem is the drop in export demand for Slovakia's car driven economy, and the country posted a trade deficit in January, as drop in demand was made worse by the suspension of gas deliveries from Russia. Exports slumped 29.9 percent on the year in January, the fourth consecutive monthly decline, and the biggest drop at least since 2006 when the statistics office began compiling data under the current methodology. Imports were down 22.4 percent. br /br /The trade deficit totalled 279.5 million euros ($361 million), following a revised deficit of 341.6 million euros in December. Slovakia posted a trade surplus of 42.3 million euros in January 2008. br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbqfcLPdzDI/AAAAAAAANCM/K40ooxi7G3o/s1600-h/slovakia+exports.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 234px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbqfcLPdzDI/AAAAAAAANCM/K40ooxi7G3o/s400/slovakia+exports.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312734016839732274" //abr /br /The drop in the demand for exports has obviously hit industrial production which decreased by 27 % year-on-year in January reach the biggest drop since the statistics office began compiling data in 1999. Manufacturing output fell 32,7 %.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sbqfg9U0jbI/AAAAAAAANCU/Ts7I1BtMGok/s1600-h/slovakia+IP.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 230px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sbqfg9U0jbI/AAAAAAAANCU/Ts7I1BtMGok/s400/slovakia+IP.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312734099003444658" //abr /br /strongSlovakia's Current Account Gap Widening/strongbr /br /The fall in the trade gap obviously works against the current account balance, and Slovakia’s 2008 current-account deficit widened 29 percent over 2007.    The 2008 gap represents 6.3 percent of preliminary gross domestic product, up from 5.3 percent of GDP a year ago. Not Spain or Greece territory yet, but certainly not a positive development given what we know about the effect of eurozone membership on some economies.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrJ26lgDGI/AAAAAAAANC8/Zz9tw-N24Ok/s1600-h/slovakia+CA+deficit.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 251px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrJ26lgDGI/AAAAAAAANC8/Zz9tw-N24Ok/s400/slovakia+CA+deficit.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312780655713586274" //abr /br /Slovakia’s government has cut its forecast for economic growth in 2009 to 2.4 percent from 4.6 percent, but this seems very optimistic indeed, and I think it will be hard for the economy not to contract. br /br /The slowdown in growth may cut budget revenue this year by about 330 million euros, or 0.5 percent of gross domestic product, According to Finance Minister Pociatek said citing preliminary estimates. The finance minister doesn't expect the deficit for this year to breach the European Union’s budget-deficit limit of 3 percent of GDP, since the original target for the shortfall of 2.1 percent of GDP. However, if the economy should contract, then of course this limit will be in danger.br /br /It is also worthy of Slovakia won fewer foreign direct investment projects in 2008 compared with 2007. The state investment agency Sario brought in  investment projects worth 538 million euros last year, less than half of the previous year’s total of 1.28 billion euros.br /br /In July 2008 Moody’s gave Slovakia an A1 rating with a positive outlook, while in November SP raised the long-term foreign currency rating to A+ from A with a stable outlook. Slovakia thus became the highest rated Central European country. The cost of protecting Slovak government debt against default rose to a record high in mid February, according to monitor CMA DataVision, with Slovakia's 5-year CDS hitting 237.5 bps. br /br /br /This means it would cost 63,900 euros to protect 10 million euros worth of German government bonds and 308,200 euros to protect 10 million euros of Irish government bonds. To get some comparative idea of what this means there is currently a Cumulative Probability of Default (CPD) of around 5.3 percent on German debt, 22.8 percent on Ireland; 10.7 percent on Belgium, while Slovakia curently has an 18.7 percent CPD.  In the short term this doesn't mean that much, since the country only had 28.6% gross debt in 2008, but it is the mid and longer term dynamic we need to think about. We have already seen the example of Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Spain, and should know that simply becoming a member of the eurozone is not a guarantee of anything in economic performance terms (although it does provide almost automatic protection from short term balance of payments crises), so it will now be interesting to watch whether the future evolution of these two newer members goes down the same road, or whether any lessons have been learnt from the earlier experience.div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/8991369883287712098-3825561050246228560?l=globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/slovenias-economy-falls-off-the-roof-while-slovakia-slides-into-recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slovenia&#8217;s Economy Falls Off The Roof, While Slovakia Slides Into Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/slovenias-economy-falls-off-the-roof-while-slovakia-slides-into-recession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/slovenias-economy-falls-off-the-roof-while-slovakia-slides-into-recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[//abr /br /Slovakia's government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkelbr;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billion-euro bank guarantee plan;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon PowerShot S400 / IXUS 400 Digital Camera;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas deliveries;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Shearing;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pociatek;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preliminary gross domestic product;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung 400PX 40 in. HDTV-Ready LCD TV;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sario;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovak government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenian government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state investment agency;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Europe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-3825561050246228560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: Barcelonabr /br /br /blockquote"Most other countries in the region are faring much better, though....Like Slovenia, which joined two years ago, Slovakia can enjoy the full protection of rich Europe’s currency union, rather than just the indirect benefit of being due to join it some day."br /The Economistbr /br /“Saying that the situation is the same for all central and eastern European states, I don’t see that……you cannot compare the dire situation in Hungary with that of other countries.”br /Angela Merkelbr /br /“Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way”br /Tolstoy/blockquotebr /br /With Slovakia going to the polls today to elect a new president, I thought this might be a good moment to examine how the two East European economies which have recently enetered the eurozone are getting on in the current crisis. None too well, would be my tentative reply.br /br /br /Slovenia’s economy contracted for the first time in more than 15 years in the fourth quarter of 2008,  and is almost certainly heading for quite a deep recession as a construction boom came to an end while demand dropped for exports to other economies in the European Union.  Gross domestic product shrank  0.8 percent year on year following a revised 3.9 percent expansion in the previous quarter. More astonishingly, quarter on quarter GDP contracted a seasonally adjusted 4.1 percent. Only Estonia and Latvia contracted at a faster rate.br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrL_-fK4cI/AAAAAAAANDE/T3ifids4VmQ/s1600-h/slovenia+GDP.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 260px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrL_-fK4cI/AAAAAAAANDE/T3ifids4VmQ/s400/slovenia+GDP.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312783010402853314" //abr /br /Goods exports were down by 9.4 percent, while goods imports fell by 7.3 percent. The positive growth services exports meant that total exports decreased less than total imports, and consequently the external trade balance contributed positively to the GDP growth (0.6 percentage points). br /br /Gross fixed capital formation decreased sharply year on year (by 5.3 percent), having grown by 16,9 percent in the first quarter of 2008, and the fall back was undoubtedly the main factor behind the shock shrinkage. Negative growth was recorded in both construction investment (-5.5 percent) and  in machinery and equipment (-6.1 percent). br /blockquotebr /“Slovenia can’t escape the sharp downturn in western Europe, and Germany in particular, so recession now seems inevitable,” according to Neil Shearing, an emerging markets economist at Capital Economics in London. /blockquotebr /br /Obviously the economic performance of Slovenia - the first new EU member to adopt the euro in 2007 - will be closely watched during this recession, to see how euro membership actually affects performance.  The Slovenian government forecast GDP growth to contract at 2 percent in 2009, but since this slowdown has come on so rapidly, it is hard to say much with certainty at this point.br /br /Slovenia’s  economy expanded in 2007 at the fastest pace since the country gained independence in 1991, with GDP increasing by 6.8 percent, driven largely by construction activity and investment. br /br /The economy was maintained largely by a sharp acceleration in government spending which was up 5 percent year on year in the last quarter.br /br /This problem seems to be an accelerated pass through of the financial crisis into other sectors of the economy with the biggest impact being felt in exports and construction investments.  The Slovenian government have introduced a 12 billion-euro bank guarantee plan (amounting to nearly one third of the country's 35 billion euro GDP), together with subsidies for shorter work time and the sale of government bonds in an attempt to restart bank lending. br /br /Industrial output and exports seem both to be very badly affected, and according to seasonally adjusted data industrial production last December was down by 4.1% over November, while year on year it decreased by 22.1%. Manufacturing output was down by 4.2% on the month and 22.2% year on year. br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbqyL38P23I/AAAAAAAANCk/Y_kDXTUVb2w/s1600-h/slovenia+IP.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 225px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbqyL38P23I/AAAAAAAANCk/Y_kDXTUVb2w/s400/slovenia+IP.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312754627501874034" //abr /br /Construction activity has been very badly hit, and in January 2009 fell by 20.7% on the year. New buildings decreased by 29.8% while civil engineering only fell by 10.2%, reflecting the impact of government counter cyclical spending. br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sbq0HlbCkfI/AAAAAAAANCs/nG5IxpigGPY/s1600-h/slovenia+construction.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 226px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sbq0HlbCkfI/AAAAAAAANCs/nG5IxpigGPY/s400/slovenia+construction.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312756752834531826" //abr /br /br /Slovenia had an estimated  fiscal deficit of 1% of GDP in 2008, but the EU Commission now forecasts this will reach 3.2% in 2009, and if the economy contracts more sharply than expected (the Commission is expecting positive growth of 0.6%) this may well be somewhat larger.br /br /strongSlovakia's GDP Drops Sharply/strongbr /br /The Slovak economy slowed further in the fourth quarter of last year with real GDP growing by 2.5 percent year on year. Whole year GDP for 2008 was 6.4 percent with total GDP reaching €67.33 billion. Economic growth had been 6.6 percent in the third quarter, and while there is no official data for seasonally adjusted quarter on quarter growth, I estimate the economy may well have contracted by around 1.5%. br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrGsHai7VI/AAAAAAAANC0/uCP75wGY8n0/s1600-h/slovakia+GDP.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 209px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrGsHai7VI/AAAAAAAANC0/uCP75wGY8n0/s400/slovakia+GDP.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312777171643854162" //abr /br /br /Part of the problem is the drop in export demand for Slovakia's car driven economy, and the country posted a trade deficit in January, as drop in demand was made worse by the suspension of gas deliveries from Russia. Exports slumped 29.9 percent on the year in January, the fourth consecutive monthly decline, and the biggest drop at least since 2006 when the statistics office began compiling data under the current methodology. Imports were down 22.4 percent. br /br /The trade deficit totalled 279.5 million euros ($361 million), following a revised deficit of 341.6 million euros in December. Slovakia posted a trade surplus of 42.3 million euros in January 2008. br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbqfcLPdzDI/AAAAAAAANCM/K40ooxi7G3o/s1600-h/slovakia+exports.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 234px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbqfcLPdzDI/AAAAAAAANCM/K40ooxi7G3o/s400/slovakia+exports.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312734016839732274" //abr /br /The drop in the demand for exports has obviously hit industrial production which decreased by 27 % year-on-year in January reach the biggest drop since the statistics office began compiling data in 1999. Manufacturing output fell 32,7 %.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sbqfg9U0jbI/AAAAAAAANCU/Ts7I1BtMGok/s1600-h/slovakia+IP.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 230px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sbqfg9U0jbI/AAAAAAAANCU/Ts7I1BtMGok/s400/slovakia+IP.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312734099003444658" //abr /br /strongSlovakia's Current Account Gap Widening/strongbr /br /The fall in the trade gap obviously works against the current account balance, and Slovakia’s 2008 current-account deficit widened 29 percent over 2007.    The 2008 gap represents 6.3 percent of preliminary gross domestic product, up from 5.3 percent of GDP a year ago. Not Spain or Greece territory yet, but certainly not a positive development given what we know about the effect of eurozone membership on some economies.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrJ26lgDGI/AAAAAAAANC8/Zz9tw-N24Ok/s1600-h/slovakia+CA+deficit.png"img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 251px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SbrJ26lgDGI/AAAAAAAANC8/Zz9tw-N24Ok/s400/slovakia+CA+deficit.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5312780655713586274" //abr /br /Slovakia’s government has cut its forecast for economic growth in 2009 to 2.4 percent from 4.6 percent, but this seems very optimistic indeed, and I think it will be hard for the economy not to contract. br /br /The slowdown in growth may cut budget revenue this year by about 330 million euros, or 0.5 percent of gross domestic product, According to Finance Minister Pociatek said citing preliminary estimates. The finance minister doesn't expect the deficit for this year to breach the European Union’s budget-deficit limit of 3 percent of GDP, since the original target for the shortfall of 2.1 percent of GDP. However, if the economy should contract, then of course this limit will be in danger.br /br /It is also worthy of Slovakia won fewer foreign direct investment projects in 2008 compared with 2007. The state investment agency Sario brought in  investment projects worth 538 million euros last year, less than half of the previous year’s total of 1.28 billion euros.br /br /In July 2008 Moody’s gave Slovakia an A1 rating with a positive outlook, while in November SP raised the long-term foreign currency rating to A+ from A with a stable outlook. Slovakia thus became the highest rated Central European country. The cost of protecting Slovak government debt against default rose to a record high in mid February, according to monitor CMA DataVision, with Slovakia's 5-year CDS hitting 237.5 bps. br /br /br /This means it would cost 63,900 euros to protect 10 million euros worth of German government bonds and 308,200 euros to protect 10 million euros of Irish government bonds. To get some comparative idea of what this means there is currently a Cumulative Probability of Default (CPD) of around 5.3 percent on German debt, 22.8 percent on Ireland; 10.7 percent on Belgium, while Slovakia curently has an 18.7 percent CPD.  In the short term this doesn't mean that much, since the country only had 28.6% gross debt in 2008, but it is the mid and longer term dynamic we need to think about. We have already seen the example of Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Spain, and should know that simply becoming a member of the eurozone is not a guarantee of anything in economic performance terms (although it does provide almost automatic protection from short term balance of payments crises), so it will now be interesting to watch whether the future evolution of these two newer members goes down the same road, or whether any lessons have been learnt from the earlier experience.div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/8991369883287712098-3825561050246228560?l=globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/slovenias-economy-falls-off-the-roof-while-slovakia-slides-into-recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Slump Narrows U.S. Trade Gap to Lowest Level in Six Years</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/economic-slump-narrows-us-trade-gap-to-lowest-level-in-six-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/economic-slump-narrows-us-trade-gap-to-lowest-level-in-six-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays Capital Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil purchases;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Coronado;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zandi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization Of Petroleum Exporting Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom equipment;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Chester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=14992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pThe U.S. trade deficit narrowed for a record sixth consecutive month in January to the lowest level in six years as imports and exports both slumped on weak domestic demand, government data showed on Friday./p
pWeak American demand for everything from oil to automobiles led to shrinking imports, which fell faster than exports, reducing the gap by 9.7% to $36 billion, compared to the $38 billion Wall Street expected, the Commerce Department said Friday in Washington./p
p“The narrowing reflects the ongoing economic downturn. U.S. consumers are pulling back and that’s resulting in fewer imports while exports are falling,” Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s a href="http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient#38;aq=h0#38;oq=econ#38;ie=UTF-8#38;rlz=1T4GGIH_enUS247US247#38;q=economy.com+moody%27s" target="_blank"Economy.com/a in West Chester, Pa., told strongemReuters./em/strong “a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/pressReleasesMolt/idUSTRE52C2SQ20090313" target="_blank"It  reflects how bad economic conditions are everywhere/a.”/p
pFor the first time since 1982,#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/economic-slump-narrows-us-trade-gap-to-lowest-level-in-six-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A perceived heartier appetite for risk spells volatility in Asian bond markets</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/malaysia/a-perceived-heartier-appetite-for-risk-spells-volatility-in-asian-bond-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/malaysia/a-perceived-heartier-appetite-for-risk-spells-volatility-in-asian-bond-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason G. Wulterkens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontier Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason g wulterkens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippine government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontiermarkets.wordpress.com/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yields on Indonesia’s three-year government bonds fell to its lowest in a month on Wednesday, prompting economists and analysts alike to cite a general increase in &#8220;risk appetite&#8221;.  The general speculation across Asia at the moment is that improving finances in U.S. banks will increase demand for emerging-market assets.
Likewise, the yield on the five-year, 5.094% [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=frontiermarkets.wordpress.com&#38;blog=3702668&#38;post=502&#38;subd=frontiermarkets&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/malaysia/a-perceived-heartier-appetite-for-risk-spells-volatility-in-asian-bond-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternative Energy: Why You Can’t Ignore “Green” Investing</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/alternative-energy-why-you-can%e2%80%99t-ignore-%e2%80%9cgreen%e2%80%9d-investing-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/alternative-energy-why-you-can%e2%80%99t-ignore-%e2%80%9cgreen%e2%80%9d-investing-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggressive alternative energy generation;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy roadmap;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green energy super-bubble;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Basenese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unwary alternative energy investors;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=14813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pLouis Basenese is one of the smartest investment analysts I know, and a good friend of mine to boot. And most of the time I agree with his research - and his conclusions. Just not this time./p
pYou see, this past Tuesday, his ema href="http://www.investmentu.com/"  class="alinks_links"Investment U/a/em article caught my attention. In case you missed it, it was written about a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/March/green-energy.html" target="_blank"green energy/a. In it, Louis makes an argument for a “green energy super-bubble” that could burst in as little as two or three years, leaving unwary alternative energy investors in the lurch./p
pIn his article, he cites four conditions that exist that make alternative energy ripe for a bubble. Those conditions may indeed be forming, but in and of themselves won’t cause a “speculative bubble.”#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/alternative-energy-why-you-can%e2%80%99t-ignore-%e2%80%9cgreen%e2%80%9d-investing-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Safe 15% Per Year, No Sweat</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-safe-15-per-year-no-sweat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-safe-15-per-year-no-sweat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=14794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pThe markets don’t get any tougher than the last few weeks. Nothing seems to be working, except for the toughest of the tough- bonds./p
pWhile we have been getting roughed up to the tune of almost a 50% drop in the stock indices, corporate bonds have been as solid as stone, with a few exceptions./p
pRight now, you can earn as much as 15-17% per year on investment grade corporate bonds with very short maturities. So why are we taking risks in the stock market and getting killed?/p
pSimple, most people know less about bonds than any other investment. Too many moving parts, too many new terms to understand, so they stay within their comfort zone./p
pYield to maturity, current yield, yield to call,#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-safe-15-per-year-no-sweat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dollar Kicks Euro</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/dollar-kicks-euro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/dollar-kicks-euro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Casey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Wilkinson;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Watt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenwich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive Brokers Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBC Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=13854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pIn the currency market, the dollar rose sharply against the euro. Late Tuesday, the euro was trading at $1.2622 vs. $1.2887 on Friday. /p
pThe buck continues to be the go-to currency around the world, and benefited yesterday from increasing worries about the euro, as Moody#8217;s warned that euro-zone banks are highly exposed to the financial turmoil unfolding in Eastern Europe./p
pAustria, Italy, France, Belgium and Germany were among the countries singled out by Moody’s as most likely to be affected./p
pWhereto for dollar/euro from here? “It is unlikely that the euro will make it through the week without printing below the October low at $1.2330 as investors collectively work out that, no matter how bad the U.S. economy looks, Europe is behind#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/dollar-kicks-euro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Steel (NYSE:X): Likely Trips Covenant in Q4; Reiterate Sell &#8211; UBS</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/us-steel-nysex-likely-trips-covenant-in-q4-reiterate-sell-ubs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/us-steel-nysex-likely-trips-covenant-in-q4-reiterate-sell-ubs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Cramer;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-3421385222572941804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"UBS is out very negative onspan style="font-weight: bold;" US Steel (NYSE:X) /spanlowering their tgt to $23 from $25 after their 2009 EPS estimate for X drops to a $0.55 loss from breakeven EPS, now incorporating weaker tubular results, plus company guidance for pension/OPEB and capex costs. Drilling permits and rig counts suggest sharply worse tubular prices and volume, retreating from record Q4. This compares with consensus ’09 EPS at $1.43. UBS foresees H1 losses, with a turnaround in Europe after destocking potentially supporting H2.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Volume recovery is key, but challenging in global recession/spanbr /The company reiterated that better volume is key to earnings recovery, highlighting the importance of economies of scale. Firm anticipates below 60% utilization in ’09 from the U.S. sheet business, as mini-mills restart to 80%, for a US average ~70%. Distributor shipments down ~40% in Q1 suggest potential downside to volumes.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Debt costs likely rise,/spanbr /UBS anticipates in Q409 U.S. Steel will trip the total debt-to-EBITDA covenant on its $750M revolver of 3.25x, registering 4.5x. UBS credit analyst Jeff Cramer also believes its credit ratings could be lowered. Currently Moody’s has X as investment grade, at Baa3, while Samp;P’s BB+ rating is junk. While debt maturities look manageable near term, they anticipate funding costs will rise.br /br /Reits Sell.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls:/span This call is going to hurt X stock for two reasons:br /br /- UBS is calling for weaker Tubular results. Tubular has been the single bright spot supporting the whole co.br /br /- Convenants tripping? Uhoh! Don't think the market is going to like this one.br //div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/us-steel-nysex-likely-trips-covenant-in-q4-reiterate-sell-ubs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debt Reckoning Looms in Eastern Europe&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/debt-reckoning-looms-in-eastern-europe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/debt-reckoning-looms-in-eastern-europe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Maher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltic states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit rating agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czech Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exposed banks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raffeisen Bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovakia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sparked fresh concern;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swedbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.deadcatsbouncing.com/span;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1897020887579135393.post-1224887817490101332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div align="justify"strongemI warned way back in June 2008 of the dangers of a potential economic crisis in Eastern Europe/em/strong in a href="http://deadcatsbouncing.blogspot.com/2008/06/eastern-europe-next-bursting-bubble.html"span style="color:#990000;"Eastern Europe: The Next Bursting Bubble?/span/a and the global economic deterioration since then has hugely increased the risks of implosion. Two weeks ago, I indicated the downside risks to Eurozone banks and the Euro itself from exposure to the region. A report this week from Moody’s, the credit rating agency, saying it could downgrade banks with subsidiaries in Eastern Europe, has sparked fresh concern over the Eurozone banking sector, leading to spiking CDS spreads for the most exposed banks such as UniCredit (45% exposure in risk-weighted assets to EE) and Swedbank (29%). emstrongThe chart below, based on BIS statistics, illustrates the debt exposure of European banks to each Eastern European economy/strong/em and Austria stands out as having disproportionate exposure relative to the size of its own economy, particularly to the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania and Hungary; Raffeisen Bank has 54% of assets tied up in the region, while Erste has 38%. If these economies tumble, they will take Austria with them. Swedish banks are also uncomfortably exposed to the Baltic states, which are in probably the worst economic shape in the region. Currency markets are reflecting these fears. Hungary’s forint has fallen to an all-time low this week and Poland’s zloty slumped to the lowest in five years on plunging industrial output. As 50% of all loans to the private sector in Poland are in foreign currencies (generally the Euro) borrowers face a severe debt shock after the 40pc fall of the zloty against the euro since August. emstrongspan style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"This article continues at /span/strong/ema href="http://www.deadcatsbouncing.com/"emstrongspan style="font-family:trebuchet ms;color:#990000;"www.deadcatsbouncing.com/span/strong/em/a./divdiv align="justify"/divdiv align="justify"/divdiv class="feedflare"
a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=djpP2R.Q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=djpP2R.Q" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=xyvyz9.Q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=xyvyz9.Q" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=py9xLk.Q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=py9xLk.Q" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=QBA9Dw.Q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=QBA9Dw.Q" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=DTj6UD.q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=DTj6UD.q" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=wPFSkE.q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=wPFSkE.q" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=be426n.Q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=be426n.Q" border="0"/img/a
/divimg src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets/~4/541687961" height="1" width="1"/]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/debt-reckoning-looms-in-eastern-europe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New High-Yield Muni ETF Not Like Other Junk Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/new-high-yield-muni-etf-not-like-other-junk-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/new-high-yield-muni-etf-not-like-other-junk-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndexUniverse Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange Traded Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvey Hirsch;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[index universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Colby;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-Term Municipal Bond ETF;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray Coleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Eck Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Eck High-Yield;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.indexuniverse.com://b303ed5995240f11bc9e4e449e45313c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
New Van Eck High-Yield Muni ETF has quite different characteristics than corporate junk bond funds.  
</p>

<p>
&#160;
</p>
<p>
While high-yield bond exchange-traded funds have proved to be popular with investors in recent years, similar options for muni investors haven't been so plentiful. The only available high-yield muni funds have been either in the closed-end marketplace or through traditional open-end mutual funds.  
</p>
<p>
But that has changed. The Market Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (NYSE Arca: HYD) was launched on Feb. 5, becoming the first of its kind in the ETF marketplace. It's expected to wind up with an annual expense ratio of 0.35%.The average high-yield muni mutual fund charges 0.63%, according to Morningstar.  
</p>
<p>
"The muni high-yield segment is very interesting and has real potential in the format of an ETF," said Harvey Hirsch, a senior vice president at Van Eck Global. "About 10% of the muni market is now represented by high-yield issues." 
</p>
<p>
HYD is the fifth muni ETF now out by Van Eck Global. Its index was created by Barclays and had about 4,204 different bonds entering 2009 with a market value of $101 billion. The average coupon in the index was about 5.82% and the average duration was 8.63 years. 
</p>
<p>
Perhaps more important for investors is the fact that the portfolio's yield is starting out at a quite-attractive 9.35%. By comparison, the Market Vectors Long-Term Municipal Bond ETF (NYSE Arca: MLN) has a yield of 5.71%. 
</p>
<p>
"There's a significant spread now between long-term investment-grade munis and high-yield munis," said Jim Colby, senior municipal strategist and portfolio manager at Van Eck Global. 
</p>
<p>
In fact, yield spreads on muni high-yield bonds are now at historically high levels compared to investment-grade munis, he added. The average spread between the two, based on long-term performances of two Barclays bond indexes, has been about 242 basis points. At the end of 2008, that differential was 636 basis points. 
</p>
<p>
"There would appear to be significant opportunity for those willing to assume the added risks of investing in high-yield munis now," said Colby. 
</p>
<p>
In the rolling 10-year period ending June 30, 2008, the taxable equivalent return on high-yield munis topped all other categories of munis, he added. "And high-yield led by a very wide margin," Colby noted. 
</p>
<p>
High-yield munis had a difficult second half of 2008. "The auto industry, airlines and paper industries that are fairly recognizable in the corporate equities indexes are also components of high-yield indexes," said Colby. 
</p>
<p>
While corporate high-yield bonds have held higher correlations to stocks in the past, that hasn't been true with muni high-yield issues, contends Van Eck. 
</p>
<p>
"Investment-grade municipal bonds have far less correlation to the equity market than municipal high-yield. The corporate component of HYD is in the order of 25% to 30%," said Colby. "That should be much less than a high-yield bond fund, which likely will hold a majority of its portfolio in corporate issues." 
</p>
<p>
And the commonly used term for the category, junk bonds, doesn't necessarily apply to munis, points out Colby. He notes a Moody's study showing that historical default rates on high-yield munis run about 4.3% on an annualized basis. By comparison, high-yield corporate default rates come out about 32.7%. 
</p>
<p>
"Muni high-yield bonds have different characteristics than they do in the corporate world," said Colby. 
</p>
<p>
<em>-- This article was submitted by IndexUniverse.com's Murray Coleman. </em>
</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/new-high-yield-muni-etf-not-like-other-junk-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HIG Misses Badly, Shares Plunge &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/hig-misses-badly-shares-plunge-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/hig-misses-badly-shares-plunge-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big concern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford Financial Services Group Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/17257/HIG+Misses+Badly%2C+Shares+Plunge+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br /><span style="underline;">HIG Misses Badly, Shares Plunge More Than 26%</span><br /><br />On February 5, 2009, after market-close,<span style="bold;"> Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/hig">HIG</a>) reported its 4Q08 and FY08 financial results. A conference call to discuss the results was held this morning.<br /><br />Core losses excluding the effects of all realized investment gains and losses for the reported quarter were $208 million ($0.72 per diluted share), versus an earnings of $840 million ($2.66 per diluted share) in 4Q07. Net loss for the reported quarter came in at $806 million or $2.71 per diluted share, versus a net income of $595 million or $1.88 per diluted share for the prior-year quarter. The company recorded net realized capital loss (after-tax) of $610 million in the reported quarter, compared to a loss of $230 million in the prior-year quarter. 4Q08 also included a $597 million after-tax write-off of goodwill.<br /><br />Book value excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI), declined 7.1% sequentially and 19.1% year-over-year to $51.69 per share. Reported book value decreased 31.7% sequentially and 53.4% year-over-year to $28.53 per share.<br /><br />The trailing 12-month ROE [return on equity] including AOCI was negative 19.3% (compared to negative 8 .6% at September 30, 2008 and 15.5% at December 31, 2007). Excluding AOCI, ROE was 4.7% at December 31, 2008 (compared to 10.5% at September 30, 2008 and 18.1% at December 31, 2007).<br /><br />The company also reduced its quarterly dividend by 84% to $0.05 per share.<br /><br />Following the declaration of the results, Moody's again lowered the credit ratings of HIG and its key operating subsidiaries, and placed a negative outlook on the ratings.<br /><br />Based on 4Q08 results, we are moderating our FY09 core earnings estimate to $5.90 per share and installing our FY10 core earnings estimate at $6.25 per share. We remain concerned with the company's huge exposure to variable annuities and the current capital levels and also suspect that the company will continue to incur increasing losses on its investment portfolio.<br /><br />As a result, HIG may need to raise additional capital in near-to-medium term. The rating downgrades and negative outlook of rating agencies also remains a big concern for HIG. We are maintaining our Sell recommendation on the shares.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com/ZER/zer_comp_reports.php?f_ticker=hig">Read the full analyst report on HIG</a><br /><br /><br />
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=HIG">"HIG" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/hig-misses-badly-shares-plunge-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Latvia Needs To Devalue Soon &#8211; A Reply To Christoph Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/why-latvia-needs-to-devalue-soon-a-reply-to-christoph-rosenberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/why-latvia-needs-to-devalue-soon-a-reply-to-christoph-rosenberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Alvarez-Rivera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltic states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bailout plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank problems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank restructuring;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by-product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabinet of Ministers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrisoph;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christoph Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claus Vistesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit ratings agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czech Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eastern europe economy watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emThe government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal tools;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenfield site;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungarian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF loan facility;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inevitable bank losses;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insolvency law;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Orchard;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LVL;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Stokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Tripartite Co-operation Council;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nils Melngailis;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parex;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy solutions;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swedish Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology ladder;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time horizon./ppThe bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyre rubber;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Europe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1443720106009957151.post-4880981900387477966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IMF Senior Regional Representative For Central Europe and the Baltics, Christoph Rosenberg, recently a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/euro-monitor/254975/why_the_imf_supports_the_latvian_currency_peg"took me to task on RGE Monitor about my Latvian devaluation proposal/a (as did a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/economonitor-monitor/254905/devaluation_in_latvia_why_not"RGE's own Mary Stokes/a), and I would like now to take a closer look at some of the points they raise.br /br /In the first place, I would like to say that I obviously regard both Chrisoph and Mary as excellent economists, and I was in no way refering to them when I said that arguing in favour of sticking to the present currency peg constitutes trying to justify “virtually the unjustifiable” according to “the implicit consensus among thinking economists.” I do still hold that the consensus is with me, but that certainly does not mean I regard those who differ from me as "unthinking", and certainly hope I didn't give the impression that I was. And with that little "mea culpa", let combat begin.br /br /And what better way to do this than by looking at Christoph's own arguments, (see below, and I hope I am being fair), although before I actually get into this part, let me "fast forward" to what I see as the three central issues involved: the timing and duration of the correction (that we all agree is needed), the role of Latvia's special demographics, and the distribution of the impact of the eventual debt restructuring between external stakeholders (the EU fiscal structure and the foreign banks) and Latvian state finances.br /br /strongV Shaped or U Shaped?/strongbr /br /As I see it, some of the force of Christoph and Mary's argument lies in the idea that there is little possibility of Latvia being able to succesfully carry out a V shaped correction at the present time due to the hostile global environment, thus it is better (my words not theirs') for Latvia to "mark time" to some extent between now and (say) 2012 (when possibly the external environment will be returning to some sort of normality, again my feeling, not theirs), and I understand the force of this point, I really do, it's just that I don't think Latvia's social fabric will be able to withstand the sort of pressure it is going to be put under (and a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/euro-monitor/255121/violence_erupts_in_latvia"Edward Harrison has already highlighted this part/a, as I have in my longer post a href="http://globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com/2009/01/long-and-difficult-road-to-wage-cuts-as.html"on the difficulties associated with introducing generalised wage reductions/a). The IMF report on the Stand-By Arrangement stresses time and again that political consensus is vital to carrying through the proposed "fixed-peg correction", and yet it seems as if a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/euro-monitor/255306/political_unrest_on_the_rise_in_economically_troubled_hotspots"we are already running into difficulties on this front/a.br /br /br /Also, and to try to keep this simple and as non-technical as possible, we are simply dealing here with trade offs, trade offs between the accumulation of bankruptcy and non-performing loans on the one hand, and the attraction of new FDI for manufacturing industry and getting growth through exports moving on the other. The trick is to get the balance right.br /br /Now the U shaped recovery puts greater weight on the former, while the V shape one puts it on the latter, and I think the choice is as simple as that really. But I would also add in a further factor (to be explored a little more below), and this is the cost of waiting (there is strongalways/strong a cost to waiting) in terms of the demographic transition Latvia is living through (I am thinking about both out-migration and the impact of population ageing and Latvia's declining potential labour force). I suspect that part of the difference between us lies in the fact that Christoph and I attach different values to the cost of waiting in the Latvian case, and the roots of this difference lie, at least in part, on the differing theoretical frameworks we are using. To be blunt, I do not live in what I consider to be the rather timeless and abstract world of neo-classical steady-state growth and convergence theory (for all of which we have precious little meaningful empirical evidence across the EU27), but in the real historical time of ageing and shrinking populations, non-linear growth trajectories and windows of opportunity.br /br /Latvia has between now and 2020 to get rich before it gets starts to accumulate so many age-dependency-related on-costs that it may, if it doesn't put in a well-founded spurt now, quite simply never close the gap. So Latvia is living in real historical time, and not an abstract theoretical one, and in the former, if you don't seize the opportunities you are offered with both hands, then you may well simply end up as tyre rubber on the highway of history, enjoying momentary fame only to end up as a historical irrelevance. So although history doesn't simply keep repeating itself in a simple circular (or Poincaréan) fashion, tragedy is always tragedy, whether it is the first, second, third or nth time round.br /br /But perhaps "marking time" isn't really a fair analogy either, since obviously Christoph feels that the time in question can be put to good use - implementing structural reforms, rewriting the bankruptcy law to make debt restructuring easier, reducing wages and prices, etc, etc - but my worry is that all this will take place against a strongly contractionary atmosphere, with strong reductions not only in real GDP but also in nominal GDP - I mean if we are talking about a 5% plus contraction in real GDP, and (let's say, just as an example) a 3% reduction in the general price level, then we are talking about a drop of about 8% in the nominal value of GDP in 2009, and about another very large one in 2010, so let's be clear, these are contractions of a large order of magnitude (not far off the US 1930 - 33 ones) and my most serious doubt is about the ability of the Latvian social consensus to hold together through this, especially if there is no visible improvement in general conditions as a result. You need some sort of carrot, and not just good will.br /br /strongWage freezes Are more Palatable than Wage Cutsbr //strongbr /Now it may seem strange to adduce arguments from evolutionary psychology (not Evolutionary Psychology, please note) in a debate about macro economic policy, but I do feel that years and years of evolution have left us with a kind of asymmetric bias which means while we definitely (always and everywhere) don't like to see our wages and salaries actually cut, we have much less resistance to them being eaten away by price inflation (again, this is the whole point of Keynes's little tract "How To Pay For The War" - its just that this war is an economic and not a military one). So politically, it is easier in principle to maintain consensus around a devaluation which followed by tight controls on income, than it is to cut people's salaries outright. Another example which illustrates my point here comes from the recent German experience, where real wage deflation was effected over a number of years (1995 - 2005), and export competitiveness restored, by maintaining a wage freeze, and getting people (during the most significant part of this process) to agree to work more hours for the same money. But to do this in Latvia you need to be able to expand output and add jobs, which is why devaluation is, in my opinion, highly desireable. You cannot expect people to work for the same money and longer hours, and agree to the chap working next to them being dispatched off to the employment offices, things just aren't that simple in the real world.br /br /br /The bicycle is must easier to keep stable if you peddle forwards.br /br /strongThe Demographics Clinch It/strongbr /br /br /br /br /pa href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU6x87sGovI/AAAAAAAAL1k/EnvJlub7-Io/s1600-h/latvia+population.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282355073325114098" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 174px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU6x87sGovI/AAAAAAAAL1k/EnvJlub7-Io/s320/latvia+population.png" border="0" //a /pbr /pSo this brings me to the biggest problem I have to the whole U shaped correction idea in the Latvian context. I will readily agree with Christoph when he says that the Latvian labour force is extremely nimble, and indeed it is especially so when it comes to packing its bags and heading off in the direction of the frontier in search of work abroad. In fact it is so nimble that it manages to do this without the Latvian statistical office even noting that the people have gone, that's how nimble they are.br //ppSo this is the outcome I really fear most, the one which means that when Latvia does eventually start to recover, this recovery will only take place with a time lag, and in the wake of an expansion in some key West European (and especially Nordic) economies, which will mean that their will be another loss of workforce in the slipstream their take off will create, a loss which can become a very serious drag on future growth, and indeed may well restrict even further the inflation-free level of sustainable growth for the entire Latvian economy. The chart below, which compares the Irish and the Latvian wage distributions comes from an earlier period (and indeed was prepared by the IMF itself), but it does give some idea of the problem, since there is a clear wage slope running across Europe from east to West, and much needed Latvian workers have an unfortunate tendency of trying to climb their way up it.br /br /(please click over image for better viewing)br /br //pa onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/RnrXR5IXIbI/AAAAAAAAAWE/wd9rpOvxEmQ/s1600-h/latvia+and+Ireland+wages.jpg"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5078608232207294898" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: pointer; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/RnrXR5IXIbI/AAAAAAAAAWE/wd9rpOvxEmQ/s400/latvia+and+Ireland+wages.jpg" border="0" //abr /So the situation envisaged in the "fixed-peg correction" - namely a period of negative economic growth and substantial wage contraction - will probably only produce yet another round of out-migration (although this time, in all probabity, it won't be to Ireland) which will in turn makes the domestic wage correction even more difficult to implement (another kind of 'vicious loop'). It is interesting to note that the IMF were raising this sort of issue with the Latvian authorities during the earlier overheating phase, but the Latvian solution (which prevailed at the time) was really to tolerate higher than desireable wage increases in order to disuade Latvians from leaving. So there is prior evidence that whatever the promises (and even, lets be generous, the good intentions) local governments find it very hard to stand in the path of their voters when these want social improvemnt, and indeed such vulnerability could come from the most compassionate and noble of motives, the problem is these are simply misplaced.br /br /strongDebt Restructuring A key Problem/strongbr /br /Here (see below) is the IMF Structural Roadmap a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?sk=22586.0"as it appears in the latest report/a, and as can be seen, there is a heavy emphasis on the legislative changes needed to carry out the debt restructuring, which gives some idea of the important role this played in the decision making process.br /br /blockquote• Cabinet of Ministers to adopt decision that reforms controls over budget execution (December 31, 2008).br /• Adopt operational guidelines clarifying procedures for provision of emergency liquidity assistance (December 31, 2008).br /• National Tripartite Co-operation Council will establish a Committee to Promote Wage Restraint (January 31, 2009).br /• Review and, if necessary, revise regulations on emergency liquidity support (January 31, 2009)br /• Complete focused examination of the banking system (March 31, 2009).br /• Develop comprehensive debt restructuring strategy (April 30, 2009).br /• Amend banking laws to give FCMC, BoL and Government powers to restore financial stability in case of systemic crisis (June 30, 2009).br /• Adopt an amendment to the Budget and Financial Management law to strengthen financial responsibility, transparency and accountability (June 30, 2009).br /• Amend insolvency law to facilitate orderly and efficient debt restructurings (June 30, 2009)./blockquotepI have to say that I am really rather surprised at a numberof the things I found on reading a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?sk=22586.0"the IMF report /ain detail. In particular I discovered that the true size of the 2009 annual fiscal deficit is going to be 17.3% and not the "mere" 4.9% that appears in the final budget accounts. This is not a problem of "massaging" (I am not suggesting that) but a by-product of the cost of bank restructuring - which involves recapitalisation and the acquisition of "troubled assets" - and these costs, under the new accounting rules, are classified as held to maturity, and not marked to market in terms of their valuation, nor, under the present convention do such liabilities appear as part of the headline fiscal deficit number. /ppNonethless Latvia's gross public debt is now set to rise, and dramatically. It is set to go up from 8.3% of GDP in 2007, to 14.3% in 2008 and to an estimated 46% in 2010. And this is all basically to pay for the bank bailout (which is estimated by the IMF to be likely to cost of $1.868 billon in 2009) and not in order to address issues in the broader economic crisis.br /br /The worrying part of all this is that if we don't get the best case scenario, and find ourselves, for example) not with a U- but with an L- shaped non-recovery, then this debt to GDP (and indeed even the annual fiscal deficit itself) may start to head above the EU 60% and 3% rules in 2011 or 2012, thus putting in jeopardy the IMF's own exit strategy for Latvia of eurozone membership. The IMF themselves go to some length to point out that the best case outcome critically depends on maintaining a political will which (as we are starting to see) may not be so strong as they were lead to believe at the time of making the agreement.br /br /The problem is that Latvia, apart from the internal credit boom, and the consequent housing bust and real economy contraction which follows (and which all three Baltic states "enjoyed" actually stands out from its Baltic peers in that it also became something of an offshore financial centre during the boom years. That is to say, there are shades of the Iceland or UK problem in the Latvian situation. I quote the IMF document:br /br /"Finally, standard debt sustainability analysis may not capture all of Latvia's characteristics, given its dependence on foreign bank borrowing for credit intermediation and its role as an offshore financial centre. First, Latvia's net foreign debt is much lower (around 70 percent of GDP), as it reinvests many of the non-resident deposits in assets overseas. The value and liquidity of these assets then becomes key. Second, much of its foreign borrowing is backed by domestic assets. Thus external debt sustainability will depend on whether these assets recover value and will be able to generate future returns to service the debt."br /br /As I read it, this means that Latvia is a miniture version of Iceland or the UK, and that as well as a macro consumption boom/bust disaster there is a non-domestic-loan recovery problem inside the banking system of some magnitude. As the IMF itself says the value and liquidity of Latvia's overseas assets is one of the "keys" to the problem. The other "key" depends on whether or not domestic assets recover their earlier value, an outcome which given even the internal price deflation strategy proposed by the IMF seems fairly unlikely, at least over the relevant time horizon./ppThe bank restructuring component is so expensive largely because the Latvian owned Parex bank (assets equivalent to more than 20% of GDP) was taken over by the government following a run on deposits and the consequent need to avoid default on the 775 million euros ($1 billion) of syndicated credits due in 2009. In fact the problems at Parex were one of the main reasons Latvia went to the IMF and EU for financial help in the first place - since in theory the issuers of the syndicated credit had the right to demand repayment of the debt immediately following a change in ownership at the bank, and the government needed the institutional support to be able to renegotiate and rollover the debt.br /br /As a result the Latvian authorities have been able to issue guarantee for the refinancing of isyndicated loans of EUR775 million due in 2009 (EUR275 million in February and EUR500 million in June). The credit ratings agencies, and in particular Fitch, believe that in the current global economic climate a rapid future sale of the bank difficult and that the government will have increasing difficulty in the future refinancing the syndicated loans. Moreover, the risk of further deposit withdrawals from Parex bank, especially by non-residents, will continue despite the effective nationalisation of the bank.br /br /The new Parex chairman Nils Melngailis was a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/privateEquityFinancialServicesAndRealEstate/idUSLB33129320081211"quoted recently as saying/a that the bank's value was anywhere between 2 lats ($3.65), the price the state paid to buy out the two previous owners, and 600 million euros. /ppIf all this is correct, then my guess is that we could even be eventually looking at the possibility of a Latvian sovereign default. I mean, personally speaking, I am pretty sure the medicine the IMF are administering just won't work (for the reasons I am putting forward) and that things will deteriorate. But sovereign default something I would never have imagined before I started digging a bit deeper into the whole situation. And the IMF should seriously be thinking about this. Latvia's level of public debt was previously very low, and then whooosh. Fitch seem to share this view, since they have maintained their negative outlook following last November's downgrade./pblockquoteFitch Ratings has today downgraded the Republic ofLatvia's long-term foreign currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR)to 'BBB-' (BBB minus) from 'BBB', Long-term local currency IDRto 'BBB' from 'BBB+' and Country Ceiling to 'A-' (A minus) from'A'. The Short-term foreign currency IDR is affirmed at 'F3'.In addition, Fitch has placed Latvia's sovereign ratings onRating Watch Negative (RWN)./blockquotepbr /br /br //pa href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SX-IRFyv1dI/AAAAAAAAMZo/x_gK48k2DvA/s1600-h/latvia+median+age.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5296101514005173714" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 224px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SX-IRFyv1dI/AAAAAAAAMZo/x_gK48k2DvA/s400/latvia+median+age.png" border="0" //abr /br /Soon enough Latvia will have to face all the on-costs of pensions, health etc for the growing numbers of old people as the median age rises (see chart above). Claus Vistesen and I are busily trying to "calibrate" things here, since notionally Latvia's median age is a lot younger (41) than that of Japan, Italy or Germany (43). But then, on the other hand, Latvians live on average ten years less. So people stop working earlier, and since the really large health care costs are during the last 5 years of life, and this doesn't change substantially if those involved are between 65 and 70 or between 80 and 85. So there is an ageing "calibration" issue here - one which non of the multilateral agencies involved have yet taken on board as far as I can see. Also we need to move the saving and borrowing age ranges around a bit when we come to think about the life cycle (to adjust for shorter working lives etc).br /br /And this "just where is all the money from the loans going" issue is a much bigger question than simply a Latvian one. The IMF original loan to Hungary, for example, included HUF 600 billion (about 20% of the total loan) to be allocated to bank bailout plans, 50% of which was earmarked for capital injections while the other 50% was to be used for state guarantees for commercial banks. The government later boosted this HUF 300 billion guarantee fund to HUF 1,500 billion, however today it has been announced that more of the IMF loan facility may be used to back loans right up to the 1,500 billion HUF level - which surely gives us an indication of the severity of the problems they are having. But what concerns us here is that as a result of these and other measures Hungarian debt to GDP is now projected to rise (Januarry 2009 EU Commission forecast) from approximately 65% in 2009 to 79% in 2010, and of course there can be downside (or if you prefer, upside) on this. So both Hungary and Latvia look dead set to me to receive further credit downgrades, downgrades which will only serve to materially worsen the situation. And thus there is a considerable danger of a self-perpetuating downward spiral, especially if due to the weighting towards the bank problems the present package of measures simply don't work. People are vastly overestimating the power of longer term structural reforms in the context of such a sharp downturn. All very troubling.br /br /br /strongDeflation A Problem?/strongbr /p/ppAlso, there is another fundamental reason for devaluation, and that is the ability to regain control over an independent monetary policy, since handling a sharp and sudden deflationary shock may well be much harder with a fixed-wheel lock-in to the ECB benchmark rate. Ben Bernanke himself gave us a good example of how the sort of debt deflation process to which Latvia is going to be subjected works in practice, and why it is so dangerous in a modern economic context) a href="http://www.princeton.edu/svensson/und/522/Readings/Bernanke.pdf"in an early paper he wrote on Japan/a.br /br /emTo take an admittedly extreme case, suppose that the borrower’s loan (taken out prior to 1992) was still outstanding in 1999 , and that at loan initiation he had expected a 2.5% annual rate of increase in the GDP deflator and a 5% annual rate of increase in land prices. Then by 1999 the real value of his principal obligation would be 22% higher, and the real value of his collateral some 42% lower, then he anticipated when he took out the loan. These adverse balance-sheet effects would certainly impede the borrower’s access to new credit and hence his ability to consume or make new investments. The lender, faced with a non-performing loan and the associated loss in financial capital, might also find her ability to make new loans to be adversely affected. This example illustrates why one might want to consider indicators other than the current real interest rate—-for example, the cumulative gap between the actual and the expected price level—-in assessing the effects of monetary policy. It also illustrates why zero inflation or mild deflation is potentially more dangerous in the modern environment than it was, say, in the classical gold standard era. The modern economy makes much heavier use of credit, especially longer term. Further, unlike the earlier period, rising prices are the norm and are reflected in nominal-interest-rate setting to a much greater degree. Although deflation was often associated with weak business conditions in the nineteenth century, the evidence favors the view that deflation or even zero inflation is far more dangerous today than it was a hundred years ago./embr /br /And it seems Lavia is now about to enter a sustained period of price and wage deflation (and thus loan to income inflation) with no monetary and no fiscal tools to attack the problem.br /br //ppstrongOK, Now for Christoph's pointsbr //strongbr /1/ ema devaluation in Latvia would have severe regional contagion effects/em. I think that on this point we are all in basic agreement. On my view, the EU and the IMF need a coherent common strategy to address the whole situation in the East (at least across those countries who form part of the EU), and I think we are rapidly getting past the point where problems can be dealt with on a piecemeal basis. I mean. clearly some of the points here post date our earlier debate, but part of the foundation of my initial argument was that the whole situation was at risk of becoming so serious that nothing less than a concerted regional initiative would have the credibility and the robustness to work. It may be that outright eurosisation of the entire group maybe the only viable way to go, but I need to argue this separately and substantially, so I will not go into this further here). But, be that as it may, the leading question is that even if eurosiation is to be contemplated, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and Bulgaria all need to come of their pegs and lower the parity at which they would enter, and even if the situation in each case is different, the problem is going to be the same, so my underlying point would be better to do this in a cordinated way, and indeed the decision by the Hungarian government to come off their band back in May could be seen as a first step in just this direction.br /br /This is doubly the case since when we talk about regional consequences, we can also talk about the regional effects of a strong devaluation of the UK pound, the Swedish krona, the Russian ruble, the Ukrainian hryvnia, the Czech koruna, the Hungarian forint, and the Polish zloty. Basically the economies in all the aforementioned countries all face a similar problem - domestic demand is down and they need to export, and they are all addressing this by the application of a mixture of devaluation and price deflation, and basically I don't see why the Baltics should be so different, and why we (or at least the IMF, the WB and the EU) don't treat the three Baltic states as one single group here.br /br /3/ emLatvia’s preference for the peg is strongly supported by all foreign stakeholders, including the EU and its Nordic neighbors..........it seems unlikely that they will cut their losses and pull out, as Japanese banks did during the Asian crisis./em Well, this is certainly the case, but it is not at all clear that these stakeholders could not be brought over to a devaluation strategy. There is currently a lively debate going on in Sweden about just how much responsibility the Swedish government and monetary authorities should accept in the context of what is happening in the Baltics (a href="http://www.balticbusinessnews.com/Default2.aspx?ArticleID=74b58ea8-76b7-46ed-acb2-286631e4a81bamp;open=sec"see here/a, and a href="http://www.balticbusinessnews.com/Default2.aspx?ArticleID=bdd51c19-f912-4a0f-b57c-d007fb49426c"here/a), and more significantly, the a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssFinancialServicesAndRealEstateNews/idUSLI39362320081218"Group Of Ten West European banks /awith most exposure to the CEE economies has started to lobby for an initiative from the ECB and the EU Commission to address the problem of the inevitable bank losses (since I take it we are agreed that the defaults will be no less on the internal deflation approach, and may well, as Krugman suggests, be greater as those who have borrowed in local currency are also forced into default).br /br /4/ emA devaluation would not significantly reduce Latvia’s external financing needs./em I am not sure about this. Obviously a devaluation which was sharp enough to remove all further worries about future devaluations would take a lot of pressure off the country's reserves. The shrinkage in the CA deficit would also, as you say, help a little, as would the fact that internal saving would start to improve domestic liquidity.br /br /While it would shrink the current account deficit further, private sector roll-over rates might not improve because the higher external debt to GDP ratio would likely result in credit agency downgrades to junk status and trigger the immediate repayment of most syndicated loans. I completely accept this point, but assume that the devaluation strategy would need to be accompanied by a loan restructuring package. Evidently this will be necessary in any event, on the devaluation variant they restructuring will come sooner, but against the difficulties this may present for a Latvian legal framework which is ill equipped to address the problems which will arise can be offset the advantages of getting all the bad news out of the way early.br /br /5/ emthere are advantages to a U-shaped adjustment via factor price compression over the V-shaped recovery that is often associated with a devaluation...../emChristoph makes the entirely valid point thatem /emLatvia’s banks (both domestic and foreign owned) and its legal system are at this point quite uprepared for the sort of stress a comprehensive debt restucturing process would put them under. By drawing the process of bankruptcies and nonperforming loan accumulation out a bit, Christoph argues, the authorities may well buy time to improve the country’s insolvency regime, strengthen banks’ capital base and allow private debt restructuring.br /br /Well, this is essentially the same set of issues as in argument 4. There are advantages in drawing out the bankruptcy process, but against these advantages need to be offset the problems posed by reform fatigue, as people are asked to sacrifice over a long period with no visible benefits to see for their effort. And there is no guarantee that the towel won't simply have to be thrown in at the end of the day on the U shaped recession, with a hasty devaluation being carried out, and the U being converted into a UL, with the bounce back only coming much later.br /br /6/ emit is questionable whether a devaluation would quickly boost exports, given the global environment and the structure of its exports/em. emRe-orienting the economy towards tradables will require structural reforms which are envisaged in the program/em. Basically, I think we are back to the "waiting room" approach again here. Export lead growth is not really a credible option at the moment, so the argument goes, given that the external conditions are extremely unfavourable, and that Latvia's economy is dominated by non-tradeables, financial services and construction. All of this is undoubtedly true, but my argument is that you have to start somewhere, and may own view is that it is better to start tomorrow, rather than the day after, and I think the key to breaking the logjam is attracting greenfield site FDI, but to do this you need to get your operating costs down, and the V shape correction achieves this outcome quicker than the U shaped one.br /br /7/em Latvia has a very flexible economy, especially a quite nimble labor market/em. Really I don't know what to make of this argument, since if this is the case, why was it not more evident during the years of dramatic wage inflation. Wage cuts of up to 25 percent do seem, as Christoph says, large, but so does the tripling of nominal wages between 2001-07 (doubling in real terms), and unless we get to grips with why all that happened in the first place (that is we take a good look at what may be the real Latvian capacity growth rate without inward migration) then I feel I remain unconvinced that we are suddenly about to see a newborn agility in the Latvian labour market. What I see are rather labour market rigidities, and a resistance to change.span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"/p/spanblockquotespan style="FONT-STYLE: italic"Some analysts called for expanding inward migration to alleviate shortages and dampen wage pressures. However, policymakers generally considered that this would have the effect of replacing domestic low-cost workers with imported ones, thereby holding down wages and promoting further emigration./span emThe government argues that rapid wage convergence with western Europe is needed to check emigration./em - IMF Staff Report, 2006br //blockquotestrongConclusions And Exit Strategy/strongbr /br /pbr /So where does all this leave us? Well basically that what we have on our hands is one hell of a mess, and that here there are no easy solutions. Did anyone tell you we lived in an imperfect world? Well what is going on in Latvia is surely as good an illustration that you are likely to find that this is the indeed the case. There are no easy, quickfix, policy solutions, and I fully understand Christoph's dilemma, and the difficulty associated with decision taking in this case./ppBut, while nothing is guaranteed to work, some approaches may turn out to be better placed than others, and it is my considered opinion that the best way of addressing the Latvian problem is by trying to kick-start the economy via devaluation, and to then tackle the wage increase problem by explicitly opening Latvia's frontiers to external migrant labour (as, for example, the Czech Republic have, to some extent, done). Such devaluation, backed by imaginative enough greenfield site support from the government, could attract the FDI, and alongside it the migrants to provide the manpower for unskilled positions, with better educated Latvians being able to get involved in some of the higher value work. If something is not done to break the population vicious circle, and the meltdown in internal demand and property prices as young Latvians seek work elsewhere then the outcome is all too clear, although not for that any less tragic, as Krugman suggests./ppOf course, some may wish to object at this point that devaluation has the same effect on wages as wage cuts do, and they would be right, but the point is strongthe overall level of economic activity is greater on the V shaped approach/strong (this was Keynes', and is today Bernanke's, basic insight). Latvian GDP is about to be thrown, from a period of trying to operate above capacity, to one where for an extended period of time it will operate below capacity. This can never be a good solution. On the V shaped recovery scenario the strongtime path of GDP is higher/strong, and the possibility of finding remunerative employment for each and every individual Latvian is to that extent greater. More idle resources will be put to work at a time when there is huge slack in the global system, and energy and material costs are at very low levels. Investment (building factories etc, buying machinery and equipment) simply couldn't be cheaper . Putting the resources to work to make this possible quite simply can't be a bad thing, or so I contend, and certainly not if the alternative may be sitting back and waiting till you have a sovereign default coming crashing in on top of you. /ppI see plenty of work for Latvian parliamentarians (passing much needed laws etc) in the current proposals but I see comparatively few initiatives which will keep the idle hands of Latvia's valuable human resource base from freezing over. /ppLet us be clear, of course there is no single clear "cure all" remedy here, but I think we need to say strongly that the earlier attempt to stem the migrant out-flow by being lax on the wage inflation front was to invite disaster (and the disaster of course came), whereas now, excessively compressing wages as the solution will have the impact which was previously feared./pstrongExport Defeatism?br //strongbr /pOne of the biggest obstacles facing countries like Latvia at the present time (of course Latvia is far from being unique, Latvia is simply the "canary in the coalmine") is a kind of passive defeatism about exports. Of course, Christoph is completely right, the global environment coundn't be more unfavourable, but there really is plenty to be done, so why not keep warm during those long dark winters doing some of it. The EU Commission points out the problem in its latest forecast:/pblockquotepExports are still dominated by commodity products and re exports, with only limited evidence of moving up the technology ladder. Hence, export revenues are exposed to volatile global commodity price developments (mainly prices of wood and metals). Furthermore, unfavourable real exchange rate developments (based e.g. on unit wage costs in manufacturing) had a negative effect on the external competitiveness of the economy. However, a recovery of exports in the first part of 2007 was driven by manufactured goods which stood at odds not only with the above described problems of the supply side, but also with the reportedly very low increase in manufacturing output in the same period. The overall conclusion on progress in strengthening the supply side is therefore mixed, but it can be concluded that the current domestic cost developments pose serious challenges to producers of tradeable goods and services. EU Commission, January 2009 Latvia Forecastbr //p/blockquotebr /pFinally Christoph has one additional point which really serves as a conclusion and a monument to all this, and that is the idea that emLatvia has a clear exit strategy from its currency predicament: euro adoption./em /ppAs Christoph says, the Latvian authorities are determined to work to meet the Maastricht criteria in 2012. Certainly entering the euro zone will not do away - at a click of the finger - with the hard lifting necessary to address the competitiveness and high external debt problems (as he suggests in his a href="http://www.imf.org/external/np/vc/2008/022008.htm"avoiding the Portuguese trap article/a, and I go through in my a href="http://globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com/2009/01/portugal-sustains.html"Portugal Sustains post here/a). But it would offer support to a struggling Latvia and help bring back investor confidence. The point is, at which exchange rate should Latvia enter ERM2? Indeed, it is now apparent - if you read the a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?sk=22586.0"IMF staff report on the standby arrangement/a, on their website, that they favoured an expansion of the band to 15% (which basically means 15% devaluation) and it was the EU itself who objected and pushed to retain the peg (see appendix below). It is not difficult to see the problems a Latvian devaluation might face in the light of the Parex related issues without direct euroisation (or EU fiscal support), but the thrust of my argument here has been that these difficulties (credit rating downgrades, sovereign default vulnerability) are going to come anyway. Indeed Latvia had its foreign-credit rating cut to Baa1 by Moodys on January 7 2009, the second such downgrade in three months, with the agency citing increased risks of a prolonged economic decline (read L shaped recession). /pblockquote“The downgrade reflects the further intensification of the economic adjustment in Latvia since October 2008,” said Kenneth Orchard, an analyst with Moody’s, in the statement. “The economic downturn is now expected to be deeper and more prolonged than previously assumed.” The risk of a “disorderly correction” to economic imbalances remains even after securing the 7.5 billion-euro ($10.2 billion) international aid package. “Government borrowing will rise significantly over the next few years to smooth the adjustment and prevent a major economic crisis,”/blockquotepBasically, the EU objected to the IMF proposal for emergency eurozone membership on the grounds that this would sat a precedent in other cases. But I really do feel that the Commission (and the ECB presumeably) are being ridiculously pig-headed here. We have an emergency on our hands, and exceptional measures are called for.br /br /It is impossible for me to go here into all the issues involved in collective membership of the eurozone for the EU12 states that are not already in, but let me just say we need a substantial rethink allround, involving:/ppa) Issuing EU bonds to collectively fund bank bailouts across the Union (East and West)br /b) Collective membership of the eurozone for those EU member states who want itbr /c) A new Lisbon Strategy and Stability and Growth Pact code involving much stricter conditions and stronger Commission powers and sanctions.br /br /c) is the necessary and prior condition for giving consideration to (a) and (b) and not the other way round. /ppFinally, thank you, one and all, who have struggled forward and reached this point. In particular thank you for being so patient with my verbal largesse. I am trying to contain it, I really am.br /br /strongAppendix: Extracts From IMF Staff Report On Latvian Request for Stand-By Arrangementbr //strongbr /emThe authorities and staff examined the merits of alternative exchange rate regimes. A widening of the exchange rate band to ±15 percent (as permitted under ERM2; currently Latvia has unilaterally adopted a ±1 percent band) would result in a larger initial output decline, since adverse balance sheet effects would reduce domestic demand. However, competitiveness would improve more quickly, reducing the current account deficit and fostering a more rapid economic recovery. The case for changing the parity would be stronger if it could be accompanied by immediate euro adoption. Technically, this would address many of the risks described above, and give Latvia deeper access to capital markets. With its negligible public sector debt, the government would also find it easier to borrow in euros on international capital markets. However, the EU authorities have firmly ruled out this option, given its inconsistency with the Maastricht Treaty and the precedents it would set for other potential euro area entrants./embr /br /br /emThe main advantage of widening the bands is that it should eventually deliver a faster economic recovery. Although growth would be depressed in the short run by balance-sheet effects (see below), the economy might then bounce back more sharply, and a Vshaped recovery would likely start in 2010. This reflects a faster improvement in competitiveness since high pass-through (reflecting Latvia’s openness to trade and liberalized movement of labor within the European Union) would be dampened by the negative output gap. Enhanced competitiveness would also reduce the current account deficit more quickly. This would come mainly from import compression, with a relatively slow response of Latvia’s underdeveloped export sector, especially as the external environment is not as supportive as in previous devaluation-induced recoveries as Argentina, Russia or East Asia.br /br /However, balance-sheet effects would cause a sharp drop in domestic demand. The net foreign currency exposure of Latvia’s private sector is around 70 percent of GDP, with the corporate sector’s foreign currency open position roughly double that of the household sector’s. A 15 percent devaluation against the euro would increase private sector net foreign currency exposure by 11 percent of GDP, two thirds in the corporate sector and one third in the household sector. Mismatches between owners of foreign currency assets and liabilities suggest that devaluation may cause substantial redistribution effects. Private consumption would fall by around 6 percentage points due to negative wealth effect as net foreign debt increases, house prices decline, debt service costs increase, and consumer confidence deteriorates. Experience of other countries suggests that a devaluation of this magnitude would lead to a 5 percentage point decline in private sector investment.br /br /Euroization with EU and ECB concurrence would also help address liquidity strains in the banking system. If Latvian banks could access ECB facilities, then those that are both solvent and hold adequate collateral could access sufficient liquidity. The increase in confidence should dampen concerns of resident depositors and also help stem non resident deposit outflows.br /br /br /br /However, this policy option would not address solvency concerns and has been ruled out by the European authorities. If combined with a large upfront devaluation, there would be an immediate deterioration in private-sector solvency, which could slow recovery. Privatesector debt restructuring would likely be necessary. Finally, the European Union strongly objects to accelerated euro adoption, as this would be inconsistent with treaty obligations of member governments, so this option is infeasible./em/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/why-latvia-needs-to-devalue-soon-a-reply-to-christoph-rosenberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barrons: Noble Drilling Trading Below Breakup Value</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/barrons-noble-drilling-trading-below-breakup-value/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/barrons-noble-drilling-trading-below-breakup-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael E. Brisky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil heading;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FULL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael brisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble Drilling Corp.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore oil leases;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert MacKenzie;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-819581243324579563.post-4996906745060250247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's some interesting news on a stock I was high on for a long time, Noble Drilling Corp. (a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=NE"NE/a).  They are an offshore oil driller with a great competitive advantage in terms of leases, locations, and how the company is structured.  The problem is its be massacred with the price of oil.  I owned it for quite awhile in 2008, but currently have no position.br /br /Barron's has an a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB123189100399379157.html?mod=9_0002_b_online_exclusives_topamp;apl=y"online exclusive out today/a saying the stock is now trading below breakup value. br /br /blockquoteFriedman Billings Ramsey Managing Director Robert MacKenzie estimates that Noble's liquidation value is $24 a share. (In valuing Noble's fleet, MacKenzie estimates what these rigs would be sold for in the open market after depreciation. To be conservative, he takes 30% off last fall's peak prices for rigs.) p origdisplay="" class="verdana"Noble's shares closed at $21.04 on Wednesday./p"Noble is trading below the worst-case intrinsic value" of its fleet of rigs, says MacKenzie. "That doesn't mean that it's not going to trade down in the near term, but anytime you can get an investment-grade company at less than what it seems to be fundamentally worth, it's a good investment over a prolonged period." p origdisplay="" class="verdana"It helps that Noble has "by far the strongest balance sheet" among its peers with debt to capitalization of 7%, adds MacKenzie. Carrying a universally Stable rating by credit agencies, its long-term debt is rated Baa1 by Moody's and A-minus by both Standard amp; Poor's and Fitch./p/blockquotep origdisplay="" class="verdana"/pp origdisplay="" class="verdana"Now, the stock price isn't going to resume higher unless a few key things happen, and the most important one would be crude oil heading higher.  The key reasons why its business model flourished over the past year are in question.  With demand soft, there is no need for oil companies to pay big money for offshore oil leases.  Noble is okay for the near term, as they have leases locked in (usually about a year out) with high dayrates, but the market trades on anticipation of future events. br //pp origdisplay="" class="verdana"Saying the stock is trading below breakup value is great from a value standpoint, but it doesn't mean you're going to make money by buying the stock.  The company likely won't breakup and sell off its assets, and those breakup values could prove to be grossly inflated if the recession lasts for a long time, or if we see a major shift from crude oil to alternative energies (this will happen, but it will take some time).br //pp origdisplay="" class="verdana"Bottom line, if you're looking to buy an oil stock, its a good buy.  They are positioned well and ready for a major bounce if oil prices come back.  A lot of the downside risk has been taken out of the stock, and if you're willing to be patient, this could be a nice buy. br //pp origdisplay="" class="verdana"Disclosure: No positionbr //p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/barrons-noble-drilling-trading-below-breakup-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SP&#8217;s Puts Spanish Sovereign Debt On Ratings Watch Negative</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/sps-puts-spanish-sovereign-debt-on-ratings-watch-negative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/sps-puts-spanish-sovereign-debt-on-ratings-watch-negative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andorra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank asset purchases;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank defualt;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Madoff;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emilio Botin.br;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emilio Botin;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfield Greenwich Group;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Comerma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[La Caixa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mauled banking system;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oecd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Koo;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarkozy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savings bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain's Instituto;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spaniards;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spanish government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trevor Cullinan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-8434369327327378504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: Barcelonabr /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SUEsR712NQI/AAAAAAAALuU/VGFiqyCyzBw/s1600-h/bond+spreads+2.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5278548924887872770" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; HEIGHT: 170px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SUEsR712NQI/AAAAAAAALuU/VGFiqyCyzBw/s320/bond+spreads+2.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /Spain yesterday became the third euro zone country within a week to be warned by rating agency Standard amp; Poor's that its credit rating (currently the highest - AAA) is under threat from the deterioration in public finances which is being produced by the government's attempt to support the banking system and put a brake on the dramatic decline in the domestic economy. As in the case of Ireland and Greece last Friday, Samp;P said Spain faces a painful process of rebalancing of its economy and a consequent marked deterioration in its public finances.br /br /The gap in bond yields between the benchmark German bunds and the sovereign debt of Spain, Greece, Ireland, Italy and Portugal has risen fourfold since July (see charts above to get some idea) to levels not seen since the launch of the euro in January 1999, and this despite the fact that bond yields have fallen for all countries since last year’s peaks in July as interest rates have steadily fallen.br /br /One year ago the financing of Spanish government debt was barely more expensive than it was in Germany, but yesterday the 10-year bond spread between the two reached more an unprecedented 92.6 basis points (or nearly a full percentage point) before settling at 92.3 basis points. The spread, or additional interest, between Spanish 10-year bonds and similar German debt rose 9 basis points, or nine hundredths of a percentage point.br /br /Credit-default swaps linked to Spanish government debt also rose 11 basis points to 106, according to CMA Datavision, in the biggest one-day move since Oct 23. Credit-default swaps, which are used to hedge against losses or to speculate on the ability of companies to repay debt, typically rise as investor confidence deteriorates and fall as it improves.br /br /The Euro was also affected by the news, and is this morning (Tuesday) still trading at a reaching a one-month low of around 1.328 to the dollar, as the negative news from Spain simply added to trader bets that the European Central Bank will reduce interest rates, the decreasing the yield differential.br /br /blockquote“Everyone knew that Spain was in trouble, but this is one of the triggers that investors were waiting for,” said Ivan Comerma, head of treasury and capital markets at Banc Internacional-Banca Mora in Andorra. “This is the worst timing as Spain is about to start with its funding plan for this year and the country’slenders are about to start selling government- backed bonds.”/blockquoteIn a climate where governments across the OECD are preparing to significantly increase their bond issues in 2009 , Spain, Ireland and Greece could find themselves paying significantly higher prices to borrow money if their ratings do in fact fall. Spain is set to increase 2009 debt issuance by around 51 percent to 104.5 billion euros in 2009 to cover its fiscal deficit. This borrowing requirement follows government announcements of something in the region of 90 billion euros in various packages of stimulus measures, in addition to measures to support banks, while at the same time tax revenue is falling due to the contraction in the economy. And we may yet see considerable overshoot on this borrowing estimate, since the government had a predicted one percent GDP growth incorporated in the original budget, and of course what we are likely to see is a contraction of several percentage points of GDP.br /br /In addition the Spanish government has offered to guarantee 100 billion euros of new bank debt this year as covering up to a further 50 billion euros in bank asset purchases intended to boost liquidity as the banks are forced to seek news sources of refinance for their expiring cedulas hipotecarias. The first financial institution to take advantage of such guarantees may well be savings bank La Caixa who have announced they plan to issue a 3-year bond next week, a bond which it seems may well be backed by a government guarantee. La Caixa's decision to move ahead with a government guaranteed bond (and ride out the stigma which could be attached) may well be influenced by the outcome of last Friday's sale by Spain's second-largest bank, BBVA, who placed 1 billion euros in 5-year unsecured senior debt on offer, without a government guarantee - the first such operation by a Spanish bank in over a year and a half. The bank set guidance on the bonds at mid-swaps plus 180 basis points, but it is far from clear that the operation was a spectacular success.br /br /blockquote“"The Creditwatch placement reflects our view of the significant challenges facing the Spanish economy as it traverses a period of very weak growth...We expect public finances to deteriorate markedly with the general deficit rising,” Standard amp; Poor’s analysts led by Trevor Cullinan said. The analysts also said they expected the general government deficit to rise well above 3 percent of gross domestic product until 2011, peaking at more than 6 percent this year. /blockquotebr /br /Spain’s public finances are thus threatened with a marked and sharp deterioration. Debt was equivalent to a mere 36 percent of GDP in 2007, compared with a 66 percent average for the euro zone as a whole, 95 percent for Greece, and 105% for Italy. Worse, Samp;P's and many others (myself included) are worried not so much by the deterioration itself (in times of crisis fiscal spending is entirely legitimate) but by the level of realism in the government's approach to the problem. What we could thus well see, in my opinion, are two or three years of above expectation annual contractions, accompanied by two or three years of above expectation fiscal deficits, with the national credit rating steadily deteriorating. We could then find ourselves in 2011 with one unholy mess of an economic problem still to be sorted out - a construction sector which is still in need of serious downsizing, and an export sector which is still far from competitive, for example - with all the resources in the national coffers effectively exhausted by a completely useless spending spree. So now it isn't only "Edward" who is saying this, we are getting some objective international responses to the situation too, and this is now likely to continue.br /br /I have been warning about this problem a href="http://eurowatch.blogspot.com/2005/11/promises-promises-but-more-than.html"in Italy for years/a (their position will be much more serious in the short term if they do get another downgrade), a href="http://greekeconomy.blogspot.com/2008/12/why-we-all-need-to-keep-eye-on-what-is.html"and I recently commented on Greece/a. Back in August 2007 a href="http://bonoboathome.blogspot.com/2007/08/ratings-agencies-and-sovereign-debt.html"I even pointed out/a what "fools" I felt Sarkozy, the EU Commission and some European MPs were being by pointing the figure directly at the ratings agencies in the sub prime scandal. As I said at the time (16 August 2007):br /br /blockquoteThe sub prime situation is in fact a good "case in point" example of this process at work. And after the agencies themselves admit the problems were worse than previously anticipated, then the markets, predictably, also over-react. So the question I am asking is, would we all now really like to see this situation replicated in the case of the Italian debt problem, or the Baltic overheating issue? Would we, or the EU Commission, be happy with the outcome?I think in this kind of area it is better not to tempt fate, or call on others to do what you are not prepared to do yourself.br /br /In the event that the Italian government is one day forced to default on its sovereign debt, will we be holding the European Commission itself responsible in the way that they would now try to point the finger at Standard and Poor's or Moody's? The root of the problem here is that the EU itself needs to be able to make accurate and clear assessments of the underlying issues involved on its own account, and to develop the capacity to face up to difficult decisions, take them, and then make them stick, rather than simply fudging everything in an ongoing process of political "deals" and horse trading. Nor is it a solution, when the going gets really tough, to outsource responsibility to agencies which really are neither designed for, or adequate to, the task in hand./blockquotebr /At the present time it isn't clear that there will be an immediate downgrade in the credit, and at AAA there is of course quite a long road to travel before we reach the menace of earning "junk bond" status. However, this is a road, however long, that it would have been better never to have started down in the first place. Even the activities of Spain's Instituto de Credito Oficial, which issues bonds in its own right as part of the bailout programme - and only this week sold a five-year euro-denominated benchmark bond will see its triple-A rating lowered in the event of a downgrade, since the rating is effectively supported by the Spanish national one. The ICO - in theory - provides backing to small and medium-sized businesses, long-term loans for infrastructure projects and financial support in cases of economic or natural disaster.br /br /br /strongThe Problems Of Resolving The Credit Crunch/strongbr /br /The difficulty I see coming in all of the above refers to the need for a large injection of funds at some point to decisively unblock the credit crunch. Let's look again at my exhibit A from the Japan experience, the chart, a href="http://www.csis.org/component/option,com_csis_events/task,view/id,1828"prepared by the Japanese economist Richard Koo/a, which shows the evolution of lending conditions in Japan during the 1990s (those who read my "coffee deflation" post will already have seen this). The thick blue line (please click over chart if you can't see adequately) shows the perception of large businesses of the willingness of banks to lend to them, as surveyed by the Bank of Japan for the Tankan index. You will note the line plunges twice, and it is the second plunge, or "credit crunch", which interests us here, since it is my conjecture that we have yet to see this part of the crunch, but that we will.br /br /This was strongthe crunch,/strong the onestrong /strongthat finally drove Japan decisively off into deflation, and produced that now famed "liquidity trap". Basically the first credit crunch was resolved via large scale government contruction spending, the guaranteeing of bank deposits, and the swallowing by the banks of a large number of non-performing loans. Does all this sound familiar? It should. But then Japan reached a point were the financial system could struggle forward no further. So the crunch broke out again, and this time the only way to resolve the problem was with two massive injections of capital into the banking system. These injections served to push the Japan government debt to GDP ratio sharply upwards, and it is this part of the story that I feel we will see repeating itself here in Spain. Maybe in 2010, maybe in 2011. It all depends how far the system can limp forward before it folds in on itself.br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SWPNn2SRsMI/AAAAAAAAMCs/pakJYeWnQ60/s1600-h/japan+willingness+II.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5288296471933857986" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 171px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SWPNn2SRsMI/AAAAAAAAMCs/pakJYeWnQ60/s320/japan+willingness+II.png" border="0" //abr /br /And while I am here one further point on all this, since  a friend of mine asked me earlier in the week some searching questions about  my "back of the envelope" calculation of a 50% to 60% of GDP cash injection requirement. That conversation has lead me to see that I may have been responsible for causing some confusion here. What I want to try and make clear that I am not saying that the extent of DEFAULT in Spain will be to the tune of 50% to 60% of GDP (private sector and bank defualt, we are not talking about government default here, and I hope that in the Spanish case we never will be), but the size of the government cash injection needed to break the back of the credit crunch.br /br /To try to explain the distinction I am trying to make lets look at one of the most publicised recent defaults in Spain - that ofMartinsa Fadesa. Now in this case the Non Performing Loan was something in the order of 6 billion euros. So in a way the press are right to talk about it as a 6 billion euro default. But of course not all the 6 billion euros is lost, since the administration process will recover something from the assets which are still to be disposed of. So even if the Spanish state has to fund in some way or another some 300 billion euros in non performing loans, this doesn't mean that net government debt needs to rise long term to pay for them, since in the end something can be recovered.br /br /The same thing goes for the cedulas. In my opinion the Spanish state will have to buy out all the cedulas which need refinancing over the next 5 years, and they will need to fund this. I estimate there may well be between 250 and 300 billion euros involved here. So someone has to raise this money, and I am saying the Spanish state cannot do this alone, or the yield spread will go through the roof as the credit rating goes down.br /br /One possibility might be the creation of EU bonds to expand the ECB balance sheet in the way that the US Treasury has done for Bernanke and the US Federal Reserve, but this raises a structural question with important political implications, since non eurozone countries like the UK and Sweden would also be being asked to underwrite eurozone debt. Or are we talking of a "shotgun-fushion of the EU and the eurozone to created that much maligned federal state which some have been arguing we need to make the eurozone a coherent entity, but which others have resisted tooth and nail. br /br /In times of need, you do what you can.br /br /Basically my view is that our architecture is a mess here, simply because not enough thought was given to all this when the eurozone was set up - in the same way little attention was paid to the question of how to avoid the kind of bubble Spain has been subjected to by having a single size for everyone interest rate policy thrust upon it. The problem is there is no eurozone specific equivalent of the EU commission which could issue bonds and regulate fiscal policy.br /br /Having acknowledged, however, that all this doesn't need to go straight onto those widely quoted debt to GDP figures, doesn't amount to saying that all those extra debt obligations don't matter, as we can see in the Japanese case. The true level of Japan debt to GDP is still a hugely controversial issue. The OECD insists on using the gross figure 182% - due to their unwillingness to put a value on assets (like land) still held by the government, and for which no one really knows the mark to market prices. Other agencies quote the much lower net debt to GDP - which is still near 100% - and until someone actually disposes of the assets the Japan government holds post the credit crunch bailout no one will really know what the true level of Japan sovereign debt is. In Japan's case this doesn't matter so much, since most of the people buying the debt are themselves Japanese (home bias) and Japan is a current account surplus country. This is not Spain's case, and Spain will need non Spaniards to buy some significant part of this extra debt, hence the problem.br /br /br /br /strongSantander Under Investigationbr //strongbr /br /As we say in English, it never rains but it pours (sempre plou sobre mullat) - and just to confirm the validity of the old adage we learn today that Spanish prosecutors are currently investigating Banco Santander's loss of more than 2.3 billion euros of its clients' money by investing with alleged swindler Bernard Madoff. Just what Spain and its badly mauled banking system needed at this moment in time - a crisis of confidence in the professional judgement of Emilio Botin.br /br /br /According to the Wall Street Journal yesterday Spain's anticorruption prosecutor is set to examine the relationship between Santander, Fairfield Greenwich Group, and the Madoff funds. Fairfield Greenwich Group is an investment fund, whose clients stand to lose $7.5 billion in the alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme. According to the Journal, investigators are looking into why Santander Chairman Emilio Botin sent his head of risk management operations to visit Madoff weeks before the scheme fell apart. Investigators are also reported to be looking into whether several people who managed money at Santander funds were aware of problems at the Madoff funds.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/sps-puts-spanish-sovereign-debt-on-ratings-watch-negative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Make Big Gains With ‘Keynesian’ Investing</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/make-big-gains-with-%e2%80%98keynesian%e2%80%99-investing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/make-big-gains-with-%e2%80%98keynesian%e2%80%99-investing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chest Fund;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hancock Preferred Income Fund;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Maynard Keynes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King's College;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Skousen;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maynard Keynes;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=9935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p#8220;Keynesian#8221; economics has been given a bad name by unprecendeted government bailouts this year. But John Maynard Keynes was also a great investor says strongDr. Mark Skousen/strong. His strategy was to buy preferred stocks of quality, high-dividend companies when everyone else was selling. Mark says today#8217;s investors can follow this advice for big long-term gains with the strongJohn Hancock Preferred Income Fund /strong(NYSE:a title="Open a new browser window to find out more" href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AHPI" target="_blank"HPI/a)./p
pThis from a href="http://www.investmentu.com/"  class="alinks_links"Investment U/a:/p
blockquotep“emPractical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist/em.” ~John Maynard Keynes, 1936/p
pWhen it comes to the best strategy to use during a treacherous bear market, I turn to advice from my favorite guru. The British economist, John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946), made a#8230;/p/blockquote]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/make-big-gains-with-%e2%80%98keynesian%e2%80%99-investing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rating agencies review corporates in GCC States</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/frontier-markets/rating-agencies-review-corporates-in-gcc-states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/frontier-markets/rating-agencies-review-corporates-in-gcc-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Broby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Frontier Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Dhabi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dubai's government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rating government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3742382075154765669.post-6394113030423814438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rating agencies are looking into various GCC institutions and may adjust some ratings. Moody’s believes that governments will intervene before a default occurs, but over the long term particular institutions may not be viable and may be merged or taken in “a sort of orderly bailout”.br /br /Talk of a GCC liquidity crisis is probably more to do with investor confidence than traditional fundamentals.  The other issue is transparency and the level of disclosure. Rating government-related entities in the region hinges on the assessment of the level of government backing they might receive, which can be tricky.br /br /Currently there are conflicting rumours about the likelihood of mergers between real estate companies, the role of Abu Dhabi and the scale of Dubai’s government debt.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/frontier-markets/rating-agencies-review-corporates-in-gcc-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primus Guaranty Ltd. (PRS) &#8211; Bear of the Day</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/primus-guaranty-ltd-prs-bear-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/primus-guaranty-ltd-prs-bear-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bermuda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Day Primus Guaranty Ltd.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Primus Guaranty Ltd.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard and Poor's Ratings Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/9418/Primus+Guaranty+Ltd.+%28PRS%29+-+Bear+of+the+Day</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Primus Guaranty Ltd. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/PRS">PRS</a>) - Headquartered in Bermuda, Primus Guaranty sells credit swaps as protection against the risk of default on investment grade obligations. The primary purchasers of credit swaps are commercial and investment banks as well as portfolio managers, insurance companies, and other financial institutions seeking to reduce the credit risk exposure in their fixed-income security portfolios. 
<p>
During October 2008, Primus Financial, the issuing subsidiary was downgraded by both S&#38;P and Moody's to AA+ and AA1 (from AAA and Aaa ) respectively, with negative implications. Additionally, S&#38;P and Moody's downgraded the 7% notes issued by Primus Guaranty to "BB" and "BA1," respectively.
</p><p>
In view of the challenging conditions, the company has decided to manage its business in the amortization mode versus the growth mode earlier. After reviewing the results, we are maintaining our Sell recommendation on the shares.
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=PRS5">"PRS5" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/primus-guaranty-ltd-prs-bear-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primus: More Downward Pressure &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/primus-more-downward-pressure-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/primus-more-downward-pressure-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 12:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bermuda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog 
Headquartered;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Primus Guaranty Ltd.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard and Poor's Ratings Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/16270/Primus%3A+More+Downward+Pressure+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Headquartered in Bermuda, <span style="bold;">Primus Guaranty Ltd. </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/prs">PRS</a>) sells credit swaps as protection against the risk of default on investment grade obligations. The primary purchasers of credit swaps are commercial and investment banks as well as portfolio managers, insurance companies, and other financial institutions seeking to reduce the credit risk exposure in their fixed-income security portfolios. <br /><br />During October 2008, Primus Financial, the issuing subsidiary was downgraded by both S&#38;P and Moody's to AA+ and AA1 (from AAA and Aaa ) respectively, with negative implications. Additionally, S&#38;P and Moody's downgraded the 7% notes issued by Primus Guaranty to "BB" and "BA1", respectively.<br /><br />In view of the challenging conditions, the company has decided to manage its business in the amortization mode versus the growth mode earlier. After reviewing the results, we are maintaining our Sell recommendation on the shares.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com/ZER/zer_comp_reports.php?f_ticker=prs">Read the full analyst report on PRS</a><br /><br /><br />    
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=PRS">"PRS" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/primus-more-downward-pressure-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dec. 4: The Best ETF Articles In The National Media</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/dec-4-the-best-etf-articles-in-the-national-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/dec-4-the-best-etf-articles-in-the-national-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndexUniverse Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange Traded Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[index universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lonski;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk Shinkle;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legg Mason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Kiesel;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Hougan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Street Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.  News & World Report;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.indexuniverse.com://5a9daac8dbdc795ab3b541b2b8da8636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
&#160;
</p>

<p>
&#160;
</p>
<p>
<strong>ETFs As The World's Playground </strong>
</p>
<p>
Kirk Shinkle, one of
the most experienced and artful markets reporters on the national
scene, takes an interesting look at ETFs as they've "evolved into a
playground for index designers, offering easy access to esoteric
corners of the market and far-flung reaches of the globe."
</p>
<p>
Shinkle, who now writes for <em>U.S. News &#38; World Report</em>,
takes an entertaining jaunt around the globe to see all of the sectors
and countries ETFs provide access to these days. Along the way, he
bumps into our own Matt Hougan for a quick observation. 
</p>
<p>
You can read the story <a href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/business/investing/2008/12/03/exotic-etfs-for-adventurers-only.html" target="_blank">here</a>.
</p>
<p>
&#160;
</p>
<p>
<strong>Corporate Bonds Set To Rocket?</strong><br />
<br />
Now that the largest bond fund manager in the world is making plans to enter the exchange-traded funds marketplace, it's worth noting that its top corporate fixed-income manager is predicting banner times in 2009 for the asset class.
</p>
<p>
<br />
Mark Kiesel tells <em>Bloomberg News</em> that despite the fact corporate bonds are heading for a terrible 2008, he expects funds focusing on that segment of the market to rebound strongly next year. In fact, he's forecasting they'll do better than equities. 
</p>
<p>
<br />
You can read the story <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#38;sid=avdyJgszNQg4&#38;refer=home" target="_blank">here</a>.
</p>
<p>
&#160;
</p>
<p>
<strong>Rising Junk Bond Rates Point To More Problems? </strong>
</p>
<p>
Meanwhile, another report from <em>Bloomberg News</em> says that with yields on junk bonds now topping 20%, the broad U.S. credit market could face a massive rise in defaults. 
</p>
<p>
John Lonski, chief economist at Moody's Investment Service, in a note forecasted U.S. default rates for the overall bond market to rise to levels not seen since the Great Depression. 
</p>
<p>
Pick your poison ... here's the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#38;sid=aRvI6WCvliK4&#38;refer=home" target="_blank">story</a>.  
</p>
<p>
&#160;
</p>
<p>
<strong>State Street To Cut 6% Of Workforce</strong>
</p>
<p>
Another big fund manager, State Street Corp., also is in the headlines. The parent of ETF player State Street Global Advisors says it plans to lay off up to 1,800 workers, mainly in North America. 
</p>
<p>
No word on how many of those job cuts will come in its SSgA unit. But this <em>Reuters</em> story notes that State Street's moves come after similar slashes at asset managers Fidelity, Janus and Legg Mason. You can read the story <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/etfNews/idUSN0352740920081203" target="_blank">here</a>.
</p>
<p>
&#160;
</p>
<br />
<p>
&#160;
</p>
<p>
&#160;
</p>
<p>
&#160;
</p>
<p>
&#160;
</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/dec-4-the-best-etf-articles-in-the-national-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Nationalization Day</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-hedge-funds/bank-nationalization-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-hedge-funds/bank-nationalization-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard C. Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hedge Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a Old HQ;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abn Amro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banco Santander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Nationalisation;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Nationalization;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank plus;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank run]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bBank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benelux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emUK Financial Investments Ltd;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortis Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halifax Bank of Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HoC Treasury Committee;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Commons Treasury Committee;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance groups;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leading Hedge Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learn About Hedge Funds;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leicester;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lloyds Bank Group;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lloyds TSB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NatWest Bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Mcdowell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Bank Of Scotland Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sold bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Hester;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telcom Company BCI;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Committee;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.K. government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Hogg;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-125009547106294711.post-3506398539526584879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[h1 style="text-align: center;"bBank Nationalization/b/h1h2 style="text-align: center;"bspan class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0);"Bank Nationalization Day/span/b/h2a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_tvshDVnXSLc/SS_l74vGpJI/AAAAAAAAAf4/J6EgOxMC024/s1600-h/RBS-DundasHouse.jpg"img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_tvshDVnXSLc/SS_l74vGpJI/AAAAAAAAAf4/J6EgOxMC024/s320/RBS-DundasHouse.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5273686505679135890" border="0" //a Old HQ pictured. Following failure of shareholders to buy more than 0.24% (only £36m for 56m shares) of the Royal Bank of Scotland Group's £20bn share issue, RBS (1) (including Citizens Bank, USA, and NatWest Bank, England) today became the third to be formally nationalised (nearly 58%). The small take-up of the issue by existing shareholders had been expected as the offer price of 65.5p was 10p higher than the price at which the shares were trading, so those who did buy on paper lost £5m doing so. The share issue by RBS was part of the government's plan to recapitalise banks. The government will pay £15bn for the majority stake in the bank plus £5bn of preference shares in the bank. Taxpayers too have an immediate paper loss of £2.4bn based on Thursday's closing share price. The bank's Chief Executive Stephen Hester said, "emWe regret that existing shareholders did not take up their pre-emptive rights but understand that market sentiment toward the banking sector made this uneconomic in the short term/em." That is the least of it. What is remarkable is that there is not more confidence in a regulated, government backed, major public company whose accounts are as transparent as the best standards demand, and whose market price is far below 'book value'? What has happened to investing in fundamentals for slightly longer than the immediate short term? Hester says,"emThere remain substantial uncertainties and challenges outside our control but for our part the job is underway/em." There are always uncertainties, but they should not any longer be called 'substantial' when a bank is covered with guarantees and writedowns and paperf losses are far ahead of any actual losses yet experienced in the underlying assets. The bank now needs its major shareholder's approval for executive pay and dividend, and has to agree to return to "normal" lending levels and more sensitive customer relations practices. Last week it said it is guaranteeing overdraft rates amp; contracts for business customers for a year at least. The UK government's shares of banks are held by a company called emUK Financial Investments Ltd/em, which is to emmaximise value for taxpayers and prevent politicians making business decisions about banks/em something that the Opposition Conservatives are keen to monitor to ensure this is true. a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_tvshDVnXSLc/SS_mKgH5_KI/AAAAAAAAAgA/cYbDGrWqcj0/s1600-h/gogarburnHQ.jpg"img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 262px; height: 175px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_tvshDVnXSLc/SS_mKgH5_KI/AAAAAAAAAgA/cYbDGrWqcj0/s320/gogarburnHQ.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5273686756770315426" border="0" //aThe new RBS HQ (pictured) opened just as RBS-led consortium's deal to buy ABN-AMRO 'successully' closed, a deal paying 71bn euros ($91bn; £61bn) for the Dutch bank, that was the last