<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stock Market News &#38; Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks &#187; Merrill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.straightstocks.com/tag/merrill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.straightstocks.com</link>
	<description>Leading Stock Market News, Opinions and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Stock Market News for November 20, 2009 &#8211; Market News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-november-20-2009-market-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-november-20-2009-market-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America Merrill Lynch;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chevron corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conocophillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy producers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq Composite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oecd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schlumberger Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Instruments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/27493/Stock+Market+News+for+November+20%2C+2009+-+Market+News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">U.S. stocks tumbled Thursday as concerns about a subdued economic recovery played in the minds of investors.  Safer bets like dollar strengthened and oil prices slumped.  As investors turned to safe havens, Treasury prices rose, sending corresponding yields lower.  Yields on three-month bills, considered one of the safest bets, turned negative for the first time since December.  A Bank of America Merrill Lynch downgrade of semiconductor industry also added to the downward pressure.     </p>
<p align="justify">The spike in bond prices came even as the Treasury announced plans to auction a record $118 billion in new notes next week &#8211; an auction schedule of $44 billion 2-year notes on Monday, $42 billion 5-year notes Tuesday, and $32 billion 7-year notes on Wednesday.</p>
<p align="justify">The Dow, which had plunged as much as 170 points during the session, ended down 93.87 points, or 0.9%, to 10,332.44.  The broader Standard &#38; Poor's 500 index fell 14.90 points, or 1.3%, to 1,094.90, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq composite index dropped 36.32 points, or 1.7%, to 2,156.82.  Wall Street&#8217;s fear gauge, the CBOE Vix, jumped more than 4%.  Crude prices dropped $1.93 to $77.46. Gold prices rose to their fifth straight record close, up 70 cents to $1141.90.</p>
<p align="justify">As glimmers of a full-blown economic recovery fade, investors have increasingly become intolerant, locking in profits at every opportunity.  Also, a lack of conviction on part of the market to push beyond the current rally has been a dampener and concerns of an asset bubble build-up due to accommodative monetary policies have diminished risk appetites, sending daily average volume to levels of only about 1 billion.   </p>
<p align="justify">Nevertheless, to show not all is bad, the OECD raised its growth estimates for its 30-country members to 1.9% in 2010 from June's estimate of a 0.7% growth, and to a 2.5% GDP expansion in 2011.</p>
<p align="justify">Tech shares, already up 54.3% year-to-date, fell 1.7% Thursday, after Merrill's analyst slashed 2010 global growth targets, and downgraded ten companies in the semiconductor sector.  Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) shares fell 4.1%, and Texas Instruments (NYSE:TXN) retreated 3.4% after the downgrade.  Dell (NASDAQ:DELL) shares plunged 6.1% in premarket trading, after the company reported earnings that missed analysts&#8217; projections.</p>
<p align="justify">Among the S&#38;P 500 industry groups, energy producers, off 2.1%, were the biggest decliners.  ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) fell 1.9% and Chevron Corp. (NYSE:CVX) dropped 2% as crude prices fell for the first time in four days. Schlumberger Ltd. (NYSE:SLB) shares fell 3.3%.</p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-november-20-2009-market-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Market News for November 12, 2009 &#8211; Market News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-november-12-2009-market-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-november-12-2009-market-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beazer Homes;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BenQ DC P500 Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kohl's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq Composite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york stock exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nordstrom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pulte Homes Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail sales data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toll Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Outfitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/27214/Stock+Market+News+for+November+12%2C+2009+-+Market+News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">With no economic reports on Wednesday and bond markets closed for the Veteran&#8217;s Day, Wall Street was witness to a quiet trading session, but stocks managed to inch higher on expectations interest rates would remain at a record low for some time.  Also, strong Chinese manufacturing and retail sales data lifted investor sentiments.  Gold prices touched an all-time high.  </p>
<p align="justify">The Dow Jones industrial average, which hit an intraday high of 10,341, advanced 44 points, or 0.4%, to close at 10,291.26. The S&#38;P 500 added 6 points, or 0.5%, to close at 1,098.51, and the tech-laden Nasdaq composite rose 16 points, or 0.7%, to end the day at 2,166.90.  On the New York Stock Exchange, 19 stocks were higher in price for every 11 that declined</p>
<p align="justify">Nine of the ten S&#38;P500 industry groups ended in the green, with financials (+1.3%), basic materials (+1.0%) and technology (+0.7%) leading the gainers.  Utilities fell 0.2%.  On the DJIA, Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) led the advancing issues as the firm&#8217;s CEO noted the integration of Merrill was running ahead of schedule, and will result in greater-than-anticipated cost savings in 2009.  Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) advanced 1.3% ahead of this morning's results.</p>
<p align="justify">Shares in home building companies rose after Toll Brothers (NYSE:TOL) said late Tuesday that signed contracts for new homes in its latest quarter jumped 42%.  Toll rose $3.02, or 16.4%, to $21.41.  Pulte Homes Inc. (NYSE:PHM) advanced 77 cents, or 8.1%, to $10.23, while Beazer Homes (NYSE:BZH) advanced 63 cents, or 12.4%, to $5.73.</p>
<p align="justify">Meanwhile, the greenback plunged to its lowest level since 2008 and ended the day just below $1.50 against the euro.  The steady decline in the greenback has been precipitated by continuing suggestions from the Fed that interest rates will remain low for an extended period as the recovery strengthens.  Across the globe, markets have interpreted this language as suggesting a mid-2010 timetable for raising rates. </p>
<p align="justify">However, gold prices steered clear of wavering sentiment and hit an all-time high Wednesday at $1114.60 per troy ounce, up $12.10.  China reported greater-than-expected industrial output and retail sales, sending resource-related shares higher. Commodity prices also rose, with the broad-based, DJ-UBS index up 0.6% to 133.408. Crude prices gained, up 0.3% to $79.28.</p>
<p align="justify">Today's retailers' results will be an indication of consumers' appetites for goods.  Although the third quarter is seasonally slow, the current quarter numbers will be closely watched as the holiday season approaches.  Yesterday's reported loss at Macy's (NYSE:M) was less than anticipated; however, its raised fourth quarter guidance failed to meet expectations. Companies reporting results today include: Kohl's (NYSE:KSS), Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN), Urban Outfitters (NASDAQ:URBN) and another key consumer-driven firm, Disney (NYSE:DIS). <br />
 </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-november-12-2009-market-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An interview with Charlie Gasparino</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/an-interview-with-charlie-gasparino/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/an-interview-with-charlie-gasparino/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prieur du Plessis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailey Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Gasparino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Prince]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Einhorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Fuld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Cisneros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment postcards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Cayne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Let Long Term Capital Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protected bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Weill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teddy Forstmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/?p=13142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan Holland has just interviewed Wall Street chronicler Charlie Gasparino's. Excerpts from the interview are published in this post.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/an-interview-with-charlie-gasparino/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC Charges BofA for Merrill Bonuses &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/sec-charges-bofa-for-merrill-bonuses-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/sec-charges-bofa-for-merrill-bonuses-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bofa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of the Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment-banking platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jed Rakoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profitable retail brokerage addition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities And Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[York Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25173/SEC+Charges+BofA+for+Merrill+Bonuses+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will aggressively pursue a trial against <strong>Bank of America Corp.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BAC">BAC</a>) for allegedly misleading investors during the acquisition of Merrill Lynch &#38; Co. late last year. The SEC accused BofA of failing to disclose to shareholders that it had authorized Merrill to pay up to $5.8 billion in bonuses to employees in 2008 even after it lost $27.6 billion that year.
<p align="left">Last month, the SEC and BofA had reached a settlement on the charges that required the bank to pay a $33 million fine. But US District Judge Jed Rakoff condemned the deal, saying the corporate fine would further unfairly penalize the shareholders instead of the people actually guilty of misleading investors.</p>
<p align="left">Both the SEC and BofA have defended the earlier settlement proposal as appropriate. But after Rakoff's ruling, the SEC weighed its options - to go to trial, drop the charges or attempt to renegotiate the deal with BofA.</p>
<p align="left">The SEC also said that it could bring additional charges against BofA on the basis of evidence that might develop in course of the trial. This indicates that regulators may draft civil fraud charges against top bank executives in the coming weeks.</p>
<p align="left">Bank of America, however, continues to defend itself by proclaiming that disclosures on the Merrill deal met all legal requirements. The bank had earlier agreed to pay a fine to avoid legal hassles with the SEC at a time of market uncertainty.</p>
<p align="left">The SEC lawsuit comes as an added blow to Bank of America. The New York Attorney General's office is carrying out its own investigation into the Merrill deal and has been drafting what are likely to be civil fraud charges against top bank executives in the coming weeks. The bank also missed a Monday noon deadline to provide additional information about the deal to a congressional committee.</p>
<p align="left">Separately, Bank of America agreed to pay $425 million to government agencies, including the Treasury Department, to exit an arrangement under which public funds might have been used to shoulder losses on risky assets worth $118 billion associated with the Merrill takeover.</p>
<p align="left">This step was part of the bank&#8217;s broader effort to loosen various forms of government support. While the option was never used, the government has argued that the bank benefited from the promise of protection.BofA has been one of the largest beneficiaries of the federal bailout program, receiving $45 billion from a total of the $700 billion.</p>
<p align="left">Bank of America did overpay for Merrill but the deal makes strategic sense now. BofA gained a global investment-banking platform, profitable retail brokerage addition and significant equity-underwriting capacity, all of which it lacked earlier. For the first half of 2009, Merrill contributed $1.84 billion.</p>
<p align="left">We anticipate continued synergies from the company&#8217;s large scale operation and balance sheet restructuring. However, higher credit costs, various legal issues and worsening credit quality will be a drag on BofA&#8217;s upcoming results. As such, we are maintaining a Neutral recommendation on the stock.</p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BAC">Read the full analyst report on "BAC"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/sec-charges-bofa-for-merrill-bonuses-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Market News for September 23, 2009 &#8211; Market News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-september-23-2009-market-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-september-23-2009-market-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BenQ DC P500 Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caterpillar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clorox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq Composite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procter Gamble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Bove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rochdale Securities;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25115/Stock+Market+News+for+September+23%2C+2009+-+Market+News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">Traders were back on the buying table Tuesday, adding to their holdings even as they remained glued to the Fed for its take on the economy, interest rates and inflation.  Banks and industrial companies led the advance as stocks zoomed to new highs for 2009.  Nevertheless, uncertainty remained if the Central Bank will offer any detail on an exit strategy. </p>
<p align="justify">The 30-share Dow Jones industrial average finished higher by 51 points, or 0.52%, at 9,829.87. The broad Standard &#38; Poor's 500-stock index gained 7 points, or 0.66%, at 1,071.66 and the technology-laden Nasdaq composite index gained 8.26 points, or 0.39%, to 2,146.30.  Treasury prices rallied after the government&#8217;s successful auction of $43 billion in two-year notes.</p>
<p align="justify">Meanwhile, dollar continued its downward spiral against other major currencies, sending energy and material shares higher.  Gold and crude prices also advanced.  Gold reached $1014 per ounce, up $12.50, and oil, after a 3.3% plunge Monday, went above the $70 level, rising 2.6% to $71.55.  Volume on the NYSE was a modest 1.27 billion shares, with advancing shares ahead of decliners by a seven-to-three margin.</p>
<p align="justify">Among the ten S&#38;P500 industry sectors, seven closed higher, led by financial shares (+2.2%), basic materials (+1.9%), industrials (+0.8%).  On the downside, telecommunication shares fell 0.6%, health care stocks eased 0.3%, and utilities edged 0.1% lower.</p>
<p align="justify">Twenty of the DJIA's thirty components finished higher yesterday.  On the Dow average, JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM) was the leading gainer, rallying 4.3% to $46.47 after analysts at Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) lifted their third-quarter earnings estimate on the firm to 49 cents per share from 46 cents per share.  Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) shares jumped 3.6%, following the expected weak dollar benefit to foreign sales.  Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) rose 2.1% after Rochdale Securities&#8217; Richard Bove raised the shares' price target to $25 from $19 due to the firm's recent moves to exit two federal guarantee programs.  However, rumors that CEO Ken Lewis might resign over the Merrill bonus saga kept the stock&#8217;s move in check.  Alcoa (NYSE:AA) rose 2.3% after analysts at Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) raised price target on the firm, citing projections for higher aluminum prices.</p>
<p align="justify">Analyst upgrades also benefited shares of Macy's (NYSE:M) (+5.1%); Citigroup (NYSE:C) lifted its rating on the shares to "buy" from "hold" on higher revenue expectations.  US Steel (NYSE:X) shares increased 4.6% after Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) changed its recommendation on the stock to "neutral" from "underperform," citing expectations the firm should return to profitability in 2010. Clorox (NYSE:CLX) shares gained 2.6% on speculation of a potential Procter &#38; Gamble (NYSE:PG) bid.  AIG (NYSE:AIG) shares fell 5.4% in a late-session sell-off on talks of a possible secondary offering.  Goldman (NYSE:GS) shares rose 1.7% to $185.52, closing at its highest level since July 2008.</p>
<p align="justify">Of key interest today would be the much-expected FOMC policy report, due out at 2:15 ET.  Expectations that the Fed will maintain record low interest rate levels of zero to 0.25% are intact. Most expect the Fed language to support an ongoing accommodative stance.  Moreover, President Obama cautioned that unemployment could even get a little worse in coming months. Therefore, the Fed's $1.75 trillion asset purchase program is likely to remain in place to encourage the recovery's traction.</p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-september-23-2009-market-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morgan Stanley CEO Steps Down, Will Remain as Chairman</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/morgan-stanley-ceo-steps-down-will-remain-as-chairman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/morgan-stanley-ceo-steps-down-will-remain-as-chairman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anton Schutz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Executive Officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Gorman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Mack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mendon Capital Advisors Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the CEO post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pMorgan Stanley (NYSE: a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:MS" target="_blank"MS/a) Chief Executive Officer John Mack will step down and be replaced by Co-President James Gorman, who has been running the company’s brokerage and overseeing its merger with Citigroup Inc.’s (NYSE: a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:C" target="_blank"C/a) Smith Barney unit./p
pThe 64-year-old Mack a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view#38;newsId=20090910006416#38;newsLang=en" target="_blank"will remain as Morgan’s Chairman/a when Gorman, 51, takes over the CEO post on January 1, the company said./p
pa href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MORGAN_STANLEY_CEO?SITE=AP#38;SECTION=HOME#38;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT#38;CTIME=2009-09-10-16-45-50" target="_blank"Mack came under criticism/a as he scaled back Morgan’s risk profile even as rivals like Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=GS" target="_blank"GS/a) regained momentum as the worst economic downturn since World War II began to wane, according to thestrongem Associated Press/em/strong./p
p#8220;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE58964J20090910" target="_blank"Gorman has really earned his stripes/a,#8221; Anton Schutz, president of Mendon Capital Advisors Corp., which owns Morgan Stanley shares, told strongemReuters/em/strong. #8220;He did a great job#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/morgan-stanley-ceo-steps-down-will-remain-as-chairman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Market News for September 8, 2009 &#8211; Market News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-september-8-2009-market-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-september-8-2009-market-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BenQ DC P500 Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Suisse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization Of Petroleum Exporting Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SociéTé GéNéRale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax preparer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24536/Stock+Market+News+for+September+8%2C+2009+-+Market+News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">A better-than-expected jobs report helped U.S. stocks rally ahead of the long weekend but the unemployment scenario continued to remain grim, signaling the much-expected economic recovery is not going to be smooth.  Worries that the rally has gone ahead of any economic recovery continued to keep a check on sentiments and stocks declined during the first three sessions of last week.  All major indexes started off on a dull note but posted strong gains in the afternoon.          </p>
<p align="justify">Following advances in the overseas markets, US stocks are expected to gain at the opening.  The DJIA futures added 79 points for a gain to 9496; the S&#38;P500 increased 9.9 points heading toward a 1023.80 open.  Markets were closed yesterday for the Labor Day holiday.</p>
<p align="justify">On Friday, the 30-stock Dow Jones industrial average rose 96.66 points, or 1.03%, to 9,441.27.  The S&#38;P 500 index rose 13.16 points, or 1.31%, to 1,016.40.  The technology-laden NASDAQ advanced 35.58 points, or 1.79%, to 2,018.78.  However, all three indexes ended the week lower.  During the week, the DJIA retreated 1.1% and the S&#38;P 500 was off 1.2%; NASDAQ was comparatively better, easing only 0.5%.   </p>
<p align="justify">As stock prices gained, Treasury bonds lost ground.  The yield on the benchmark 10-year note rose 0.09% to 3.44% and the 30-year bond yield rose 0.11 to 4.27%.  On Tuesday $38 billion in 3-year notes is slated for auction, on Wednesday $20 billion of 10-years, and on Thursday $12 billion in 30-years.</p>
<p align="justify">Last week, Tax preparer (NYSE:HRB) saw its shares fall after the firm reported a wider-than-expected loss of 39 cents a share.  Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) shares rose ahead of its media event next week where it is expected to introduce iPod Nano and Touch models that include digital cameras.  Societe Generale sharply raised its price target on the iPhone maker.</p>
<p align="justify">Traders return to their desks in a holiday-shortened week with last September&#8217;s collapse of Lehman Brothers absorption of Merrill and a government bailout of AIG still fresh in their minds.  Although a lot of water has passed under the bridge since then, traders still remain skeptical about the prospects of a full blown economic recovery.</p>
<p align="justify">This week, healthcare and insurance stocks may take a cue from President Obama's attempt to garner support for his much-talked-about healthcare initiative in a rare joint session of Congress Wednesday.  Remarks from Saudi Arabia's oil minister that crude markets are "in good shape" indicate further production cuts are not expected at this week's OPEC meeting.</p>
<p align="justify">Moreover, a Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS) report noting, "This is the ideal phase of the economic cycle...There is more of a positive growth surprise to come over the next three to six months," could be viewed in positive light.  Credit Suisse projected a 13% gain in the S&#38;P500 to 1150 by mid-2010.</p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-september-8-2009-market-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BofA to Resolve Merrill Lawsuit &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/bofa-to-resolve-merrill-lawsuit-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/bofa-to-resolve-merrill-lawsuit-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jed Rakoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/23974/BofA+to+Resolve+Merrill+Lawsuit+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><br />
Bank of America Corp.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BAC">BAC</a>) agreed to settle a class-action lawsuit against Merrill Lynch &#38; Co. for $150 million. The lawsuit accused Merrill Lynch for misleading investors with respect to the sale of bonds and preferred stock.
<p align="left">The preliminary approval of the settlement, granted by US District Judge Jed Rakoff on Aug. 21, was made public yesterday.</p>
<p align="left">Two Louisiana pension funds were the major applicants for the lawsuit. About 20 former Merrill executives and directors were named as defendants. The company was accused of issuing false and misleading prospectuses and registration statements in the offerings between 2006 and 2008.</p>
<p align="left">Bank of America acquired Merrill Lynch on Jan. 1, creating the largest U.S. bank by assets.</p>
<p align="left">We think that Bank of America is in relatively good shape from a capital perspective. During this delicate period of market stress, the availability of significant private-sector capital is very limited. As a result, management remains focused on managing asset-levels efficiently, ensuring the deployment of TARP funds in core lending businesses and trimming other assets in non-core businesses.</p>
<p align="left">We also think that the management is quite confident about its capital position as it has recently indicated that it is in discussion with regulators for paying back a material amount of TARP funds.</p>
<p align="left">We anticipate continued synergies from the company&#8217;s large-scale operation and balance sheet restructuring. However, higher credit costs and worsening credit quality will be a drag on upcoming results.</p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BAC">Read the full analyst report on "BAC"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/bofa-to-resolve-merrill-lawsuit-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stitch in Time</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/stitch-in-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/stitch-in-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernie Madoff;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London School of Economics;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stalin;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy  Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasury secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zimbabwe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pAt least something good has come out of the economic crisis; it blew off the purple robes that clothed economists and exposed their naked flanks. Still, they don’t deserve the beating they’re getting in the press – with snide remarks and sarcastic comments; they deserve better. A beating with sticks! /p
pEven Alan Greenspan admitted he had “found a flaw” in his own thinking. We will have to imagine the giggles from the back of the room – if anyone had been awake. It was as if Stalin had confessed to being rude to his mother or Bernie Madoff copped a plea for shoplifting. The mea was fine, but the culpa didn’t seem to measure up to the facts. strongHe, more#8230;/strong/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/stitch-in-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman…Goldman…Goldman…</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/goldman%e2%80%a6goldman%e2%80%a6goldman%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/goldman%e2%80%a6goldman%e2%80%a6goldman%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Xie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buenos Aires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lehman bros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romano Prodi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p Goldman Sachs Would Have Collapsed If Not For Henry Paulson./p
pThe Dow slipped a bit yesterday – only 39 points. Everyone is watching. They want to see how far this rally carries on. Many think it is more than a bear market bounce; they think it is for real./p
pThe prevailing opinion is that quick action by the feds avoided a more serious meltdown. Ben Bernanke says he was working to prevent a “second great depression.”/p
pAnd now that the crisis is past, the economy is slowly climbing out of its hole. The second quarter showed GDP falling at 1% per year in the US#8230; rather than the 6.4% rate recorded earlier in the year. Housing sales have perked up. Oil is trading#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/goldman%e2%80%a6goldman%e2%80%a6goldman%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cash for Liquor Anyone?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/cash-for-liquor-anyone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/cash-for-liquor-anyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Reckoning  vacation headquarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Herald Tribune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Rogoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professor of economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[set 10 ;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the International Herald Tribune;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasury secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pThe future cometh#8230;Cash for bankers! Cash for Detroit’s clunkers! From one scam to the next#8230;But first, let us turn to the latest market update. /p
pThe Dow rose again yesterday – up 33 points, to close at 9,320. We set 10,000+ as our objective for this bounce. We’ll stick with it for a while longer./p
pMake no mistake though. No one knows how long this rally will last – certainly no one here at the a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links"Daily Reckoning/a vacation headquarters. It will continue until it runs out of gas. That could be tomorrow. It could be months from now./p
pIt will run out of gas sooner or later, and probably this fall. A real, durable bull market would require an economic boom – a genuine#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/cash-for-liquor-anyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video-o-rama: Goldman Sachs ad nauseam</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/commodities/video-o-rama-goldman-sachs-ad-nauseam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/commodities/video-o-rama-goldman-sachs-ad-nauseam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 07:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prieur du Plessis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aline van Duyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Ritholtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Can Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief economist and co-founder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Kofinis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Suisse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damien Hoffman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Wessel;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic strategist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dennis Berman;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Newmark;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusion IQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusion IQ CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Shilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giles Keating;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Head of Global Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Influential bank analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Investor columnist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment postcards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Zweig;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffery Harte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Siegel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Authers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Prewitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacroMarkets;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Keiser;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meredith Whitney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meredith Whitney Advisory Group;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nouriel roubini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican strategist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Shiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stern School of Business;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Holt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Keene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wharton finance professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/?p=8798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am experiencing Internet problems and have difficulty accessing my data sources. This week’s video compilation is therefore posted without the usual introductory paragraphs. But I’m sure the interesting clips will speak for themselves.
Wall St Cheat Sheet: AIG - writing stories about people who play &#8220;it&#8221; safe
&#8220;Evidently, AIG is a company that plays &#8216;it&#8217; safe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/commodities/video-o-rama-goldman-sachs-ad-nauseam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paulson To Testify On BAC/Merrill Merger  &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/paulson-to-testify-on-bacmerrill-merger-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/paulson-to-testify-on-bacmerrill-merger-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21649/Paulson+To+Testify+On+BACMerrill+Merger++-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />On Jul 16, Former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is expected to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee as to whether he and/or other government officials pressured <b>Bank of America</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BAC">BAC</a>) to acquire Merrill Lynch, which resulted in a $20 billion cost taxpayers. 
<p>This will follow BAC CEO Kenneth Lewis' statements before the committee that both Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke threatened to oust BAC's CEO and the bank's board members if they abandoned the takeover after discovering losses at Merrill. </p>
<p>In September 2008, BAC agreed to acquire Merrill Lynch, which resulted in the government supplying an additional $20 billion to BAC in order to cope with rising losses following the acquisition. This was on top of the $25 billion from the government's bailout program. </p>
<p>We would be surprised if the story behind the headlines is ever revealed. </p>
<p></p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BAC">Read the full analyst report on "BAC"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/paulson-to-testify-on-bacmerrill-merger-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Market News for June 25, 2009 &#8211; Market News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-june-25-2009-market-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-june-25-2009-market-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[787 Dreamliner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConAgra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legg Mason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lennar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCormick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micron Tech;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nelson Peltz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SuperValu Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21449/Stock+Market+News+for+June+25%2C+2009+-+Market+News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">A surprise rise in demand for durable goods and Oracle's better-than-expected earnings pushed equity markets higher yesterday, but stocks pared gains as policy makers at Federal Reserve decided to keep the benchmark interest rate between zero and 0.25%.  The S&#38;P 500 index edged up 0.7% to 900.94 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 23 points or 0.3% to end the day at 8299.86.  Tech-heavy Nasdaq jumped 1.6%.  Boeing (NYSE:BA) continued to trade lower after announcing that it had again delayed initial test flight of its 787 Dreamliner program.  Volume on the NYSE was light at 1.10 billion with advancing issues outpacing declining stocks by a seven-to-three margin.  Crude price eased 0.2% to $68.53 as weekly US stockpile reports were ahead of estimates.  The absence of Fed plans to extend or increase its $300 billion debt buyback program sent Treasury prices lower, with the 10-year, which influences interest rates on mortgages and other consumer debt off 20/32 and the 30-year off 1 14/32.</p>
<p align="justify">Although Fed noted that the economic contraction is slowing, its decision to maintain the status quo was widely expected and unanimous.  The Fed also sounded a cautious tone, noting the economy "likely to remain weak for a time," as the consumer remains constrained and employment weak. Nevertheless, at the end of the two-day meeting in Washington, no plans for additional quantitative easing were announced.  At the same time, the central bank reiterated that it is likely to keep the interest rates at low levels for an extended period.  </p>
<p align="justify">Among S&#38;P sector grouping, technology stocks led the gainers with a 1.4% rise, after Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) advanced.  Oracle (NASDAQ:ORCL) jumped 7% to $21.26 after reporting better-than-expected results.  Legg Mason (NYSE:LM) jumped 11% and was the leading gainer on the S&#38;P 500 after media reports said billionaire Nelson Peltz bough a stake in the company and would be looking for a breakup or sale.  On the downside, Supervalu Inc. (NYSE:SVU) led the decliners on the S&#38;P 500 after it said first quarter earnings will be "substantially below" Street estimates.</p>
<p align="justify">Meanwhile, data continued to suggest that recession may be ending.  Durable goods orders unexpectedly rose for the second month in a row, up 1.8% in May, and up 1.1% excluding transportation. Estimates were for a 0.9% decline in total orders, and a 0.5% drop excluding transportation. Of greatest note, nondefense capital orders jumped 4.8%, rallying from the prior two months' falls of 2.9% in April and 1.4% in March.</p>
<p align="justify">Thursday sees Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke testifying before a House of Representatives Committee regarding Bank of America's (NYSE:BAC) acquisition of Merrill.  Companies reporting their results include ConAgra (NYSE:CAG), McCormick (NYSE:MKC), Micron Tech (NYSE:MU) and Lennar (NYSE:LEN).</p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-june-25-2009-market-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Market News for June 18, 2009 &#8211; Market News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-june-18-2009-market-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-june-18-2009-market-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitol One Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discover Financial Services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FedEx Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance coverage;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare overhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House committee;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jefferies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JM Smucker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regions financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research-In-Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard and Poor's Ratings Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Poors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Instruments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasury secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells fargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21200/Stock+Market+News+for+June+18%2C+2009+-+Market+News</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">U.S. stocks declined for the third consecutive day after Standard &#38; Poor's cut its credit ratings and outlooks for 22 banks and bellwether FedEx Corp's weak profit forecast reignited worries of a prolonged recession.  Nevertheless, consumer and technology stocks helped Nasdaq end the day higher with a 0.7% gain. </p>
<p align="justify">Pre-market futures suggest a flat opening as traders look for concrete signs of an economic recovery, amid fears of increased government interventions and a crushed economic rebound.</p>
<p align="justify">Commodities and financial shares led the decliners yesterday, but healthcare stocks rose after Democratic leaders began working on a healthcare overhaul that would make it mandatory for all Americans to have health insurance coverage.  Shares traded in a narrow range, swinging between gains and losses.  Among S&#38;P industry groups, financials led the declining issues with a 2.2% fall.  Oil and basic materials both recorded a 1.6% fall.  Stocks of consumer services companies gained 1.1%, with drug retailers rising 2.3%.</p>
<p align="justify">Among financial sector issues, Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) fell 3.4%, Citigroup (NYSE:C) plunged 5.2% and Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) recording a 5.4% decline.  JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM), Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), State Street (NYSE:STT) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) repaid funds borrowed under the government's TARP program.  The Obama Administration's proposed plan for a major financial system overhaul to counter the "cascade of mistakes and missed opportunities of the past decade," however, could not boost sentiments, even as $68 billion of TARP funds were repaid on Wednesday.  S&#38;P, on its part, cited less favorable conditions industry-wide and greater volatility in financial markets for its decision to lower ratings on banks. Banks mentioned included Regions Financial (NYSE:RF), Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC), Capitol One Financial (NYSE:COF) and PNC (NYSE:PNC).</p>
<p align="justify">Technology stocks, nevertheless, showed some resistance, riding high on a number of analyst upgrades and a better-than-expected forecast from Adobe Systems (NASDAQ:ADBE). Merrill/BoA upended its rating on Texas Instruments (NYSE:TXN) from "underperform" to its US I Focus List with a $27 target, noting its expected margin expansion even as the firm faces only modest cyclical recovery prospects. Qualcomm (NASDAQ:QCOM) rose after Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) added the firm to its conviction buy list, citing a raised global handset forecast along with an undervalued royalty business.</p>
<p align="justify">Chevron (NYSE:CVX) shares declined 1.5% after weekly crude stockpiles showed a larger-than-expected decline of 3.87 million barrels.</p>
<p align="justify">Among corporate releases slated for today are JM Smucker (NYSE:SJM) and Discover Financial Services (NYSE:DFS); Research in Motion (NASDAQ:RIMM) is expected to report results after today's close. Treasury Secretary Geithner is scheduled to testify in a House committee hearing on financial regulation. Jefferies' Healthcare Conference continues for its third and final session. </p>
<p align="justify"></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/stock-market-news-for-june-18-2009-market-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company News for June 5, 2009 &#8211; Corporate Summary</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-june-5-2009-corporate-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-june-5-2009-corporate-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bhp Billiton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinalco;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dupont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gap Stores;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port Arthur refinery;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rio tinto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20799/Company+News+for+June+5%2C+2009+-+Corporate+Summary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">* Valero (NYSE:VLO) was downgraded to "underperform" from "market perform" following news of its suspension of expansion plans for its Port Arthur refinery. Valero's 40 million shares offering was repriced lower at $18, sharply off original estimates, although only a slight discount to Wednesday's close</p>
<p align="justify">* Goldman Sachs' (NYSE:GS) removed Gap Stores (NYSE:GPS) from its conviction buy list, and downgraded the stock to "neutral."</p>
<p align="justify">* Dupont (NYSE:DD) was downgraded by Merrill's analysts as being fully priced</p>
<p align="justify">* Rio Tinto (NYSE:RTP) initiated a deeply-discounted $15.2 billion rights issue as well as a joint venture with BHP Billiton (NYSE:BHP), walking away from its $19.5 billion Chinalco (NYSE:ACH) deal</p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-june-5-2009-corporate-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Rosenberg: Market musings  data deciphering</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/david-rosenberg-market-musings-data-deciphering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/david-rosenberg-market-musings-data-deciphering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 07:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prieur du Plessis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cape Town]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gluskin Sheff & Associates;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment postcards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/?p=5508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Rosenberg, Merrill’s former chief North American economist, has returned to his native Toronto and commenced duty with buy-side firm Gluskin Sheff &#38; Associates. David has just produced his first report as chief economist and strategist of his new employer, as shared in this post.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/david-rosenberg-market-musings-data-deciphering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TW Telecom (NASDAQ:TWTC): Downgraded at Merrill and FBR</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/tw-telecom-nasdaqtwtc-downgraded-at-merrill-and-fbr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/tw-telecom-nasdaqtwtc-downgraded-at-merrill-and-fbr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBR Capital;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TW Telecom;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-4627691695032994425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[span style="font-weight: bold;"TW Telecom (NASDAQ:TWTC)/span gets two downgrades this morning:br /div style="text-align: justify;"br /span style="font-weight: bold;"- Merrill Lynch/BAM /spandowngrades TWTC to Underperform from Buy with a $10 tgt on the realization of their thesis, strong stock performance and valuation. TW Telecom shares are discounting a view that the company can maintain its current revenue trajectory and margin profile throughout the economic downturn. Firm's projections are more cautious, as they believe TW Telecom’s contractual business model creates a lagged effect regarding changes in economic activity. TW Telecom faces regional economic pressure.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"- FBR Capital /spannotes TWTC reported better-than-expected 1Q09 results but provided a cautious outlook for 2009, reflecting macro trends, weak enterprise demand, product substitution, and pricing pressure. Results for 1Q09 were largely ahead of consensus and FBR expectations, driven by solid execution amid a difficult environment and reflecting the relative resiliency of the telecom services subscription-based business model. The $10M acquisition of a metro fiber asset (plus ancillary assets) in early 1Q09 is augmenting customer growth. Adjusted EBITDA exceeded expectations due to the combination of higher revenue and higher gross margin but was partially driven by a $2M deferral in merit pay increases to 2Q09. Enterprise revenue momentum in  2Q09 is a key focus, and management conveyed a cautious tone, consistent with FBR's meeting on March 12. Although 1Q09 is typically a seasonally weak quarter, they have not extrapolated the revenue growth rate, as they do not believe there has been a pickup in business demand at this juncture. The  company typically sees revenues from new contract signings after a 60-day to six-month buildout following a new contract, suggesting lower 1Q09 signings will be evidenced in 2Q09 and 3Q09. FBR believes shares are fairly valued in the $12 range, and moderating revenue trends may limit near-term upside potential. Tspan style="font-weight: bold;"hey are lowering their rating from Outperform to Market Perform but would expect the shares to respond positively to any evidence of revenue momentum as part of a recovery scenario, which they believe it is too early to call./spanbr /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls: /spanTwo downgrades, with one coming from a tier-1 firm with a large client base will likely hit the stock. I would not be surprised to see sub-$11 levels today.br //divdiv class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/29297569-4627691695032994425?l=notablecalls.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/tw-telecom-nasdaqtwtc-downgraded-at-merrill-and-fbr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merrill’s David Rosenberg on Our Frugal Future</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/merrill%e2%80%99s-david-rosenberg-on-our-frugal-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/merrill%e2%80%99s-david-rosenberg-on-our-frugal-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flashiest car;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=16569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pHere’s Merrill Lynch economist David Rosenberg on employment trends, the consumer and why we face a frugal future (hat tip Zero Hedge): This post-credit collapse/asset-bubble burst cycle remains an enigma, and we strongly believe that investors today who are buying stocks and selling bonds in anticipation of a sustained reflation trade are going to end up as disappointed as they were under similar conditions in 2002./p
pThere may be a growing sense that because the stock market has enjoyed a nice bounce, credit spreads have come in and new issue activity has perked up, that somehow things are going to get better in the real economy. Not so fast. We may be out of the hurricane, but it’s still raining outside.#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/merrill%e2%80%99s-david-rosenberg-on-our-frugal-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Williams-Sonoma (NYSE:WSM): Downgraded at Merrill/BAM and Sanford Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/williams-sonoma-nysewsm-downgraded-at-merrillbam-and-sanford-bernstein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/williams-sonoma-nysewsm-downgraded-at-merrillbam-and-sanford-bernstein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank agreements;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernstein;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycle retail call;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early cycle retail;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overall retail;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams Sonoma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-3868442259466781671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"span style="font-weight: bold;"Williams-Sonoma (NYSE:WSM)/span is getting two downgrades today:br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"- Merrill Lynch/BAM /spanis downgrading WSM to Neutral from Buy with a $13 tgt noting that while WSM’s LT viability and strong brand identity remain intact the shares up substantially since December as a result of the realization of numerous factors, which are reflected in today's share price, the current risk/reward ratio is not as compelling. The balance sheet has strengthened, cash flows have improved, the dividend is intact, bank agreements have been renegotiated, inventory levels significantly reduced, capex reduced to a minimum, comps sequentially improved from Oct 2008 lows.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"- Sanford Bernstein/span is out with a U.S. Retail downgrade taking their rating down on WSM, HD and LOW (from OP to MP).br /br /Early cycle retail call is rapidly running its course, leading them to shift their overweight sectorbr /positioning to a more balanced market-weight. As evidence continues to accumulate that the cyclical downturn in the broader economy and the consumer sector is beginning to bottom, the rationale for overweighting the early cycle retail / consumer discretionary sector is waning. Broadly, the leading indicators have turned positive, and weekly jobless claims have now been in a downtrend for over a month, both of which in the past have preceded the official conclusion of prior recessions. span style="font-weight: bold;"Firm notes their are not explicitly calling an end to the recession, but they are very cognizant that 12-month relative returns for the retailers have turned negative around the conclusion of past recessions. /spanAs the probability increases of an end to this recession in 2009, the investment case for a Retail sector overweight deteriorates, which argues for a more selective approach to Retail.br /br /Within the context of overall retail, the home-related retailers have tended to be the earliest of the early cycle names, given housing's typically leading characteristics. This cycle has been similar, with HD and LOW among the best performing stocks in firm's coverage in 2008 (outside of the more defensive auto parts retailers).br /br /With this strong relative performance and significant multiple expansion, these two stocksbr /are now already discounting a majority of a recovery to fair value. Based on our view of normalized margins in the 9.5% range for both,   blended fair value framework suggests only 20% to 30% upside to true fair value. While this still represents meaningful upside, they  would argue that relative returns could pale in a true economic recovery and that still significant uncertainty in the timing and pace of recovery to normalized margins should keep the stocks at some reasonable discount to true fair value.br /br /WSM is a somewhat different case as the stock performed relatively poorly in 2008 (- 31% relative) as liquidity concerns pressured the stock, but year to date, WSM is up ~80% versus the market. Bernstein sees normalized margins in the 7% range (in line with WSM's 15-year average), which implies a fair value of ~$15 or approximately 15% upside to FV from current levels. Given more significant and lingering structural questions around WSM's business model and competitive positioning, they would need to see more significant upside opportunity to continue to recommend the stock.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls: /spanTwo downgrades will do their damage to WSM's stock price today. I see it going to about $12-ish (or slightly below) where it will find buyers and squeeze higher again.br /br /Going short retail is going to be the next crowded trade, I suspect.br //divdiv class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/29297569-3868442259466781671?l=notablecalls.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/williams-sonoma-nysewsm-downgraded-at-merrillbam-and-sanford-bernstein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parting thoughts from David Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/bonds/parting-thoughts-from-david-rosenberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/bonds/parting-thoughts-from-david-rosenberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 08:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prieur du Plessis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cape Town]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gluskin Sheff & Associates;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment postcards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the University of Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler  Durden;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/05/06/parting-thoughts-from-david-rosenberg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Rosenberg, respected chief North American economist at Merrill Lynch, is leaving the firm this month to return to his native Toronto. This post features some of his thoughtful parting comments.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/bonds/parting-thoughts-from-david-rosenberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ralph Lauren (NYSE:RL): Downgraded to Underperform at Merrill/BAM</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/ralph-lauren-nyserl-downgraded-to-underperform-at-merrillbam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/ralph-lauren-nyserl-downgraded-to-underperform-at-merrillbam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anniversary of the sell-in of American Living;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Easter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F10;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Lauren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail comps;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SP500;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-497359561422716220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"Merrill Lynch/BAM is out with span style="font-weight: bold;"cautious comments on Apparel players /spansaying following easy sales and weather comparisons in March, underlying momentum may still be weak (adjusting for the Easter shift) as retailers continue to face traffic and ticket pressures.br /br /Firm also notes relative outperformance of retail stocks (vs. SP500) usually ends in May as Retail stocks typically outperform the SP500 starting in Jan / Feb, peaking in Mar, and then underperform in May/Jun until Aug/Sep. Branded Apparel stocks typically start to underperform the SP500 in Jun and July.br /br /They are downgrading span style="font-weight: bold;"Ralph Lauren (NYSE:RL)/span to Underperform from Neutral (with a $42 tgt) noting that after benefiting from the upward mobility in customer spending patterns (as key dep’t stores customers focused on up-scaling merchandise assortments through ‘06-’07), dep’t stores shift away from a higher AUR strategy and emphasis onsharper price points, coupled with continued customer traffic declines and tightening inventory plans, should be unfavorable to RL’s core US wholesale outlook through F10 (roughly 30% of RL’s global revenues concentrated in M, DDS, KSS, and JCP). RL will also face the difficult anniversary of the sell-in of American Living (initial shipments started in Dec 07 – F3Q08, launched Feb 08, with additional category launches throughout 2008).br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Owned retail comps likely still weak/spanbr /Owned retail comps (40% of F09E rev) at full-line and outlet stores are also deteriorating and could pressure results through F1H10, despite RL’s efforts to reduce inventory levels.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Europe should moderate; FX amp; Expenses pressure outlook/spanbr /Declining trends, already impacting RL’s owned Retail in Europe, could pressure Europe wholesale (from the +DD% in constant currency for F3Q09), despite the Lauren launch Spring 09.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls:/span I think the downgrade makes sense here - the stock is up a lot from March lows and there are only neg. catalysts on the horizon.br /br /Can RL do 2 pts worth of downside today? Yes, unless the market goes bananas again./divdiv class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/29297569-497359561422716220?l=notablecalls.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/ralph-lauren-nyserl-downgraded-to-underperform-at-merrillbam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emerson (NYSE:EMR): Upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Merrill/BAC</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/emerson-nyseemr-upgraded-to-buy-from-neutral-at-merrillbac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/emerson-nyseemr-upgraded-to-buy-from-neutral-at-merrillbac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Hopkins;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerson;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Oldman;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannibal;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mason Verger;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research-In-Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upgraded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-2427963921894355403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"Merrill Lynch/BAC is upgrading span style="font-weight: bold;"Emerson (NYSE:EMR)/span to Buy from Neutral while establishing a whopping $50 tgt on the name (vs. prev. $32 tgt)br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Lagging share price creates opportunity/spanbr /EMR has significantly lagged its industrial peers during this recent rally – Merrill thinks driven by concerns that trough earnings for Emerson occur much later than other perceived shorter cycle plays. However, they think earnings for most industrials are likely to trend lower in 2010, which they think puts EMR on more of a comparable footing to close the performance gap with other industrials.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Emerson business outlook appears to be turning higher/spanbr /Firm thinks the outlook for Emerson’s business, on average, has also begun to turn up. For instance, Emerson has the largest direct exposure to China at ~9% of revenues. Roughly 75% of the company’s products are estimated to be tied to infrastructure spending which should benefit from global stimulus efforts. In addition, roughly one quarter of Emerson’s product mix sells into economically sensitive end markets – mostly in North America – that should benefit in a U.S. recovery.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Future order rate improvement could boost sentiment/spanbr /Emerson’s orders also appear to be hitting trough levels at down over 20%. Consequently, once the rate of order decline begins to ease – possibly later this year – they think the stock could also respond favorably.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls:/span That $50 tgt will surely catch traders attention and cause the stock to move above the $35 level.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"PS:/span I know I should be making fun of the span style="font-weight: bold;"Research in Motion (NASDAQ:RIMM)/span upgrade out of UBS this morning. I won't, though - the fact they upgraded it here is retarded enough.br /br /span style="font-style: italic;""I'll bet you wished you had fed the rest of me to the dogs."/spanbr /span style="font-style: italic;"Gary Oldman as Mason Verger/spanbr /br /span style="font-style: italic;""No, no Mason I prefer you the way you are."/spanbr /span style="font-style: italic;"Sir Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal/spanbr //divdiv class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/29297569-2427963921894355403?l=notablecalls.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/emerson-nyseemr-upgraded-to-buy-from-neutral-at-merrillbac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BofA CEO&#8217;s Future Unclear &#8211; Zacks Tale of the Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/bofa-ceos-future-unclear-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/bofa-ceos-future-unclear-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of america corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countrywide Financial Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/19672/BofA+CEO%27s+Future+Unclear+-+Zacks+Tale+of+the+Tape</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>The fate of embattled <b>Bank of America Corp.'s</b> (<a href="void(0)">BAC</a>) Chief Executive Kenneth Lewis remained a matter of speculation on Wednesday afternoon after the company asked for more time to count the votes from its annual meeting in Charlotte. </p>
<p align="left">Meanwhile, Lewis defended his decisions before shareholders who had criticized the largest U.S. bank's acquisition of Countrywide Financial Corp. and Merrill Lynch &#38; Co. At the annual meeting, investors voted on a proposal to separate the posts of chairman and CEO at the firm. </p>
<p align="left">"This has been an incredibly difficult and painful year for all of us," Lewis told shareholders, "But we are building this company for the long term." Lewis had earlier indicated that regulators did not allow him to back out of the deal that required $20 billion in federal loans. </p>
<p align="left">Bank of America believes Merrill would help the bank in the long run due to the strength of its financial advisers. </p>
<p align="left">While some investors complained about not being informed about the state of Merrill's losses, others backed the management for its decisions made during the worst financial downturn since the Great Depression. Some news sources claim that all 18 directors were re-elected to the board by shareholders but the vote tally on Lewis' chances of reclaiming the chairman's title were too close to call. </p>
<p align="left">Bank of America might release the final results later on Wednesday. Shares of the company were up more than 4% to $8.52 in New York trading. </p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZRANK&#38;t=BAC">"BAC" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/bofa-ceos-future-unclear-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And Then There’s This…Friday, April 24th, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6friday-april-24th-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6friday-april-24th-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ambrose Evans-Pritchard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Dodd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comatose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Far East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Grandits;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis Threat;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pBoth gold and silver were comatose all night long in the Far East#8230;and all through European trading once again. However, the moment that the London p.m. fix was in, both metals#8217; prices went vertical. Silver got capped before it hit $13#8230;but gold managed to close above $900, and is now above $910 as I write this. As I said yesterday#8230;Friday is options expiry#8230;so be ready for anything. But even I wasn#8217;t expecting that. Today#8217;s New York price action should be enlightening./p
pNeedless to say, Ted Butler and I had a discussion about yesterday#8217;s goings-on. His guess [and it's only a guess] is that the #8216;four or less#8217; traders in the Commercial category of the Commitment of Traders#8230;all bullion banks#8230;have covered all#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6friday-april-24th-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Protect Your Finances from Reckless Government Spending</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/how-to-protect-your-finances-from-reckless-government-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/how-to-protect-your-finances-from-reckless-government-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10x Optical Zoom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.7" Widescreen Hybrid LCD];]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buenos Aires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centex Corp.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Delvalle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dennis Gartman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dennis Kellerman;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Federal Reserve;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Third]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frederick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartman Letter;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gregg Wahl;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoover;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jesse livermore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Mauldin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keycorp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak  Easyshare Z812-IS Zoom 8.2 Megapixel 12x Optical/4.2x Digital Zoom Digital Camera;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Fall;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Hutchinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martin weiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxine Waters;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media critics;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mgm mirage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Klein;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nijs;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil service stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on-line publication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outrageous solution;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC protocol;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regions financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony DCR-DVD403E Handycam DVD Camcorder [3MP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler  Durden;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Bancorp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usa Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westwood Capital;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tr
strongNotes from thebr /
Investment Underground/strong 
/tr
tr

pThursday, April 23, 2009/p
pPalermo Viejo, Buenos Aires, Argentina/p
pstrongThe greatest economic disaster in  recorded history (and how to profit from it)#8230;  Your market ”script”#8230; Lessons on guerrilla investing#8230; Banks  switch sides#8230; The best communications company in the world#8230; 3 sectors  you should own now#8230; Your key to “permanent wealth”#8230;  A massive glitch in the administration’s matrix#8230;/strongstrong /strong strongemNotes/em subscribers beat up on your editor#8230; 1,159% gains as  stocks go bust#8230; And more! /strong/p
pstrong***  “The current administration#8217;s economic strategy could create the greatest  economic disaster in recorded history,” /strong says a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/porter-stansbury/"  class="alinks_links"Porter Stansberry/a in today’s ema href="http://www.dailywealth.com"  class="alinks_links"DailyWealth/a./em/p
ulNot only is the administration  planning on enormous deficit spending this year, but the current plan  calls for increasing deficit spending emfor the next decade /em– spending  that will more than#8230;/ul/tr]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/how-to-protect-your-finances-from-reckless-government-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company News for April 20, 2009 &#8211; Corporate Summary</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-april-20-2009-corporate-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-april-20-2009-corporate-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banco Pactual;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countrywide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halliburton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepsi Bottling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PepsiAmericas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PepsiCo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stiefel Labs;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/19278/Company+News+for+April+20%2C+2009+-+Corporate+Summary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">* Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) joined banking firms reporting better-than-expected first quarter numbers. Its earnings beat Street estimates by 40 cents, posting at 44 cents versus 23 cents a year ago and estimates of 4 cents, as Merrill and Countrywide acquisitions remained "on track." </p>
<p align="justify">* Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) bettered estimates by 3 cents, reporting first quarter earnings of 44 cents a share versus 64 cents a year ago </p>
<p align="justify">* GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE:GSK) announced plans to acquire US skincare provider Stiefel Labs for up to $3.6 billion</p>
<p align="justify">* UBS (NYSE:UBS) said it will sell its Brazilian I-bank, Banco Pactual, for about $2.5 billion</p>
<p align="justify">* PepsiCo (NYSE:PEP) offered $29.50 in cash and stock for Pepsi Bottling (NYSE:PBG) and $23.27 per share for PepsiAmericas (NYSE:PAS), valuing the companies at about $6.4 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively</p>
<p align="justify">* Oracle (NASDAQ:ORCL) announced plans to acquire Sun Microsystems (NASDAQ:JAVA) for $9.50 per share, or about $7.4 billion<br /></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-april-20-2009-corporate-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Ready for Ken Lewis and Bank of America (BAC) reporting Earnings Monday (4/20)</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/get-ready-for-ken-lewis-and-bank-of-america-bac-reporting-earnings-monday-420/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/get-ready-for-ken-lewis-and-bank-of-america-bac-reporting-earnings-monday-420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank Lara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countrywide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative accounting;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1309 at http://thestockmasters.com</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p
img src=http://www.euromoney.com/images/502/50149/Abigail_KenLewis.gif alt=Bank of America's Ken Lewis align=right /What tricks does Ken Lewis have up his sleeves for Monday?  Get ready for Bank of America's (NYSE:BAC) Q1 Earnings call tomorrow and the talking heads expect them to report a profit of 5 cents a share.  Thanks to creative accounting, I mean Mark-to-Market accounting, BofA could 'strongspan style=color: #3366ffchoose its own adventure/span/strong' and hit profits in the 5 to 26 Cent range, but why stop there, let's shoot for for a whole Dollar!
/p
pa href=http://thestockmasters.com/bofa-bac-earnings-q1-mark-to-market-04202009.htmlread more/a/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/get-ready-for-ken-lewis-and-bank-of-america-bac-reporting-earnings-monday-420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take Profits on Banks Trade &#8211; Fox-Pitt</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/take-profits-on-banks-trade-fox-pitt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/take-profits-on-banks-trade-fox-pitt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox-Pitt;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-3145338351858811110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"Fox-Pitt recommends closing their March 11 trade — a long/short strategy of long Banks and short Pamp;C Insurance and Insurance Brokers.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"At that time, their analysis was based on: /span1) the depressed values of financials, and especially the Banks sector, since the Inauguration; 2) the potential run-up in Banks as short-covering, changes in Mark-to-Market rules, and plans for distressed assets benefited the stock prices over the short term; and, 3) the movement wherein banks had become strongly negatively correlated with the Pamp;C Insurance and Insurance Brokers sector.br /br /In their March 11 note, they also suggested unwinding the trade before April as the market braces for another bad quarter for the Banks sector. After the recent run-up, the firm believes that unwinding the trade is appropriate at this time. Short covering has probably run its course, the latest plan from Secretary Geithner has provided a substantial boost, and they believe that the next catalyst on the Banks sector is likely to be earnings reports, which should be more negative.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"The results of the trade, from the close on March 10 to the close on March 23:/spanbr /Banks: +43%br /P/C Insurance: +28%br /Insurance Brokers: +13%br /br /A combination of long Banks/short Pamp;C Insurance would have yielded a +15% return, while shorting Insurance Brokers instead would have yielded a +30% return. Removing HIG ($9.30- In Line) and XL ($5.69-In Line) from the Pamp;C basket (as they are moving on the same credit and asset fundamentals as Banks) would have lowered the Pamp;C return and boosted the long/short by an additional 6%.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Fox-Pitt's long-term sector ratings based on fundamentals continue to be:/spanbr /Banks: Underweightbr /Pamp;C Insurance: Marketweightbr /Insurance Brokers: Overweightbr /br /The Pamp;C Insurance and Insurance Brokers continue to be negatively correlated with Banks, much more than in the past, although the correlation between Banks and Pamp;C Insurance has become slightly less negative.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls: /spanJust to let you know what the analysts are telling their clients. I noticed Merrill/BAM was out with a similar call yesterday.br /br //divdiv class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/29297569-3145338351858811110?l=notablecalls.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/take-profits-on-banks-trade-fox-pitt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Steel (NYSE:X): Price tgt lowered to $11 at Merrill/BAM</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/us-steel-nysex-price-tgt-lowered-to-11-at-merrillbam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/us-steel-nysex-price-tgt-lowered-to-11-at-merrillbam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank covenants;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[near term concern;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-5427630055320566193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"Merrill Lynch/BAM is out with some pretty harsh comments on Steels lowering their hot rolled coil price benchmarks given the continued fall in steel prices. Revised ’09 benchmark is now $475/ton, down from previous forecast of $600/ton. They are also revising their ’10 and ’11 forecasts to $550/ton (was $650/ton) and $600/ton (was $700/ton). Firm is now assuming a 55% utilization rate for the group in 2009, down from 65%.br /br /One of the most hardest hit names in the sector is span style="font-weight: bold;"US Steel (NYSE:X):/spanbr /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Cut EPS outlook, uses of cash to exceed $1bb in 2009/spanbr /Given the decline in benchmark pricing/operating rates they are lowering ’09E EPS to a $6.00 loss (was $2.00 loss) and revising down ’10E and ’11E EPS as well. US Steel has an undrawn $750mm revolver but liquidity is a near term concern as bank covenants could be tripped. In firm's view, US Steel is a prime candidate to issue equity and cut the dividend near term as it looks to bolster its liquidity position. Assuming reduced revolver access, they estimate the company is facing a $700mm funding gap this year.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Decreasing PO to $11/spanbr /With EPS and EBITDA at negative levels this year, they value X based on 60% of tangible book value (in line with previous trough levels). This brings PO to $11 (was $24). Based on revised PO, they calculate 35%+ downside to X shares.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Highest conviction underperform call /spanbr /Merrill maintains underperform view on US Steel given the company’s high fixed cost structure, automotive exposure, and liquidity issues. Profits in all segments are under pressure and they see further downside to Street consensus. In firm's view, 2009 losses should be comparable to those seen in the 2001-03 timeframe.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls:/span Merrill's $11 tgt is the new Street Low (prev. was $16). This will attract sellers. I suspect new lows are in store for X in the n-t.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"PS:/span With USD down...any downside is going to be muted today, I think.br //divdiv class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/29297569-5427630055320566193?l=notablecalls.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/us-steel-nysex-price-tgt-lowered-to-11-at-merrillbam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandisk (NASDAQ:SNDK): Sell, $6 tgt at Merrill/BAM reinstated &#8211; SHORT</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/sandisk-nasdaqsndk-sell-6-tgt-at-merrillbam-reinstated-short/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/sandisk-nasdaqsndk-sell-6-tgt-at-merrillbam-reinstated-short/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAND chips;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PO of US;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-7870485572801569546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"Merrill Lynch/BAM is out reinstating coverage on span style="font-weight: bold;"Sandisk (NASDAQ:SNDK)/span with an Underperform rating and $6 tgt.br /br /Although its stock price has massively underperformed the Samp;P over the past three years, their PO of US$6.0 implies over 40% downside risk. They acknowledge its solid B/S (net cash) and IP (royalty revenue), but forecast large losses through 2009-10 and only a weak recovery in 2011.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Hit by excess JV capacity; needs to restructure biz model/spanbr /SanDisk’s large exposure to NAND chip production capacity via its JVs with Toshiba is likely to remain a big burden, in Merrill's view. The JV’s transfer pricing for NAND chips (manufacturing cost plus mark up to generate breakeven performance or higher for the JVs) to SanDisk is far higher than spot prices (and vice versa in the case of chip shortage). This clearly indicates cost disadvantages during the downturn vs. pure OEMs. NAND industry model still indicates a glut even in 2010.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Large loss and off B/S items are negative catalysts/spanbr /The firm expects negative EPS for three consecutive years (2008-10E). This is expected to lead to substantial book value erosion until 2010. Cost disadvantages (JV capacity) and potential downside risks to royalty revenue (license agreement with Samsung expires in August 2009) coupled with the NAND downturn also present risks to estimates and valuations. They also note that the lessors for the JV fabs may require earlier payments if SanDisk fails to meet its debt covenants.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"New funding likely; dilution concerns linger/spanbr /Merrill doesn't expect immediate cash drain, but SanDisk needs to preserve more cash for large operating losses and unexpected lease obligation payments for the JVs. They expect the company to raise about $500m from potential new equity financing in 2Q-3Q09 to meet estimates of their capex and working capital needs.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls: /spanGiven the 10% run on Friday (and 30%+ run over last week), I think there's a trade in the short side in store. MLCO's comments will bring panic sellers.br /br /I would not be be surprised to see SNDK retrace at least Friday's gains toward the $10 level (I may be too optimistic here as we may see lower levels.)br //divdiv class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/29297569-7870485572801569546?l=notablecalls.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/sandisk-nasdaqsndk-sell-6-tgt-at-merrillbam-reinstated-short/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alcoa (NYSE:AA): Target lowered to $3 at Merrill/BAM</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/alcoa-nyseaa-target-lowered-to-3-at-merrillbam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/alcoa-nyseaa-target-lowered-to-3-at-merrillbam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banc of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lower metal price assumptions;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal price.br /br /span style=;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-2313579016987545708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"Merrill Lynch/Banc of America is out neg on span style="font-weight: bold;"Alcoa (NYSE:AA) /spanlowering their tgt to $3 from $6 after reduced EPS outlook. Their rating continues to be Underperform.br /br /Based on a $0.59/lb aluminum price (was $0.88), they are revising down our 2009e EPS to a $1.50 loss (was $0.20 loss). 2010e EPS is revised down to $0.00 (was $0.90) based on a $0.79/lb metal price.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Cash burn situation is the key issue/spanbr /AA should be able to bring its costs down to ~$0.80/lb in 1H09 ($0.99/lb in 4Q08) but metal prices are expected to remain below breakeven over the near term. Based on lower metal price assumptions, the firm forecasts AA will burn $2.5bb of cash in ’09 if metal prices do not recover (assuming no dividend cut). In their view, a dividend cut could ease AA’s cash burn situation but does not buy much extra time. They believe AA has sufficient liquidity to fund operating losses into mid-’10.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"BAS-ML adopting more bearish commodities stance/spanbr /Today, the Global BAS-ML Commodities Team lowered its price assumptions for aluminum, copper, nickel and zinc (Metals Strategist, 4 March 2009). Aluminum consumption has declined by 15-20% over the past months, but production curtailments have only been about 12%. Aluminum inventories are expected to build and the market is expected to remain in surplus over the next 3-4 years. The surplus is forecasted to reach 807k mt (was 607k mt) in ’09 and recover slightly in ’10 to 514k mt (was 386k mt). This market imbalance will likely keep aluminum prices under pressure over the next 2 years.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls: /spanThe $3 tgt (50% downside to tgt) reads ugly for Alcoa. I think we are going to see some more downside in the name today.br //div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/alcoa-nyseaa-target-lowered-to-3-at-merrillbam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Investment News Briefs Thursday, March 5, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/global-investment-news-briefs-thursday-march-5-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/global-investment-news-briefs-thursday-march-5-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays Capital plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill gross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Kolinski Morris;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employers Cut;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford Motor Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general electric co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Investment Management Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private employers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sailesh  Jha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Reserve Bank of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=14558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pIndia Cuts Repurchase Rate to 5%; Private Employers Cut 697,000 Jobs in Feb.; U.S. Auto Sales Down 41% in February; Oil Rallies to Six-year High; Merrill’s Top 10 Execs Paid $209 Million Last Year/p
ul class="style2"
liThe Reserve Bank of India reduced its repurchase rate from an already low of 5.5% to 5.0%, its fifth cut since October. “a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601091#38;sid=a_2KVhBr3AWE#38;refer=india"We       see a significant slowdown in investment/a,” Sailesh Jha, a senior       regional economist at Barclays Capital Plc in Singapore, told strongemBloomberg/em/strong.       “There is scope for more significant rate cuts.”/li
/ul
ul class="style2"
liADP       Employer Services said that a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5232V420090304"U.S.       private employers cut 697,000 jobs in February/a, an acceleration of the revised 614,000 jobs lost in January. The figures mark the biggest job loss since the report’s launch in 2001, strongemReuters/em/strong reported./li
/ul
ul class="style2"
liU.S.#8230;/li/ul]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/global-investment-news-briefs-thursday-march-5-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Much Time to Save Earnings Season &#8211; Earnings Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/not-much-time-to-save-earnings-season-earnings-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/not-much-time-to-save-earnings-season-earnings-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[0.22	

	6 	

	22 	

	Technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[0.28	

	9 	

	30 	

	Technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10	

	Technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[596 	

	Technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conocophillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Mobil Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Laboratories;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McKesson Corporation;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Malkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P 10 ;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wachovia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/9987/Not+Much+Time+to+Save+Earnings+Season+-+Earnings+Trends</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<i>Highlighted stocks include <b>McKesson Corporation</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MCK">MCK</a>), <b>Forest Laboratories</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/FRX">FRX</a>), <b>Exxon Mobil Corporation</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/XOM">XOM</a>), <b>Chevron Corporation</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CVX">CVX</a>) and <b>ConocoPhillips</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/COP">COP</a>).</i>
<p ALIGN="left">
<hr />
</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Key Points:</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<ul>
<li>Earnings reports remain ugly, total net income running 37.9% below a year ago
</li><li>Surprise ratio of 1.70:1 and median surprise of 2.22% are both below "normal"
</li><li>Fourth-quarter total net income expected to be 32.7% below year ago
</li><li>Financials red ink is $18.9 billion versus $6.0 Billion black ink last year
</li><li>Excluding Financials, total earnings down 20.5% so far
</li><li>Still heading south as 2009 expectations fall 2.22% in a week
</li><li>More than 1/3 of all 2009 consensus earnings estimates down more than 10%; 1/6 down more than 25% over the last month
</li><li>Total net income in 2009 now expected to fall 10.0%, following 13.3% 2008 decline
</li><li>P/Es based on 2009 estimates will prove to be to low as "E" plunges
</li><li>Bottom up estimate for S&#38;P 500 now $65.12 in 2009, down from $66.60 a week ago; I expect it to be less than $60.
</li></ul>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Total Net Income Growth</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
For those that desperately search for silver linings in the earnings expectations data, the best that can be said is that the rate of decline has slowed somewhat.<table align="right"><tr><td></td></tr></table>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The bottom-up consensus earnings estimate declined 2.2% over the last week, but at least that is a much slower decline than the 6.6% decline the week before. However, anyone who thinks that the earnings for the S&#38;P 500 in 2009 will come in at anything close to the current figure of $65.12 is an absolute fool.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
When looking at this data, the trend is always more significant than the level at any given date. While down 2.2% is better than down 6.6%, it is still awful any way you cut it. We are talking weekly changes here, not monthly.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
If the rate of decline were to slow to 1.0% per week for the rest of the year, that would mean that earnings for the year would be only $41.01. I suspect that it will end up being somewhat higher than that, since I am optimistic that the economic stimulus package will get passed and will start to have some limited impact in the second half. Even so, earnings of $55 for the year seem like a fairly optimistic forecast, but in the right ball park.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The question then becomes, what sort of multiple should one put on those earnings. As of Friday lunchtime, the <b>S&#38;P 500</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/SPX">SPX</a>) was trading at 868.10, which based on earnings of $55 would put the P/E at 15.8x. To make money holding the S&#38;P 500 then one of two things has to happen. Either I have to be all wet about the $55 earnings level, or the multiple has to expand from this level. Granted interest rates are low and they are depressed earnings, but north of 16x is a pretty princely multiple.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The earnings declines are very widespread. When we combine those that have already reported with the expectations for those yet to report (implicitly assuming no surprises for the yet to report group), 8 of the 10 economic sectors are expected to earn less in the fourth quarter of 2008 than they did in the fourth quarter of 2007, and 7 of those sectors have expected declines of over 19%. The outlook for the first quarter is just as bad, with an expected drop of 28.5% and nine sectors down and one essentially unchanged.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="center">

<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tr> <th COLSPAN="10"><b>Total Net Income Growth (Reported)</b><font size="2"></font></th> </tr>
<tr bgcolor="#A2D39C"><td align="left"><b><u>	Sector	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q2 '08 A	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q3 '08 A	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q4 '08 A	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q1 '09 E	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2007 A	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2008 A	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2009 E	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2010 E	</u></b></td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Health Care	</td>	<td align="center">	8.80%	</td>	<td align="center">	6.06%	</td>	<td align="center">	8.07%	</td>	<td align="center">	-4.81%	</td>	<td align="center">	20.11%	</td>	<td align="center">	8.99%	</td>	<td align="center">	-0.47%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.61%	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Utilities	</td>	<td align="center">	3.13%	</td>	<td align="center">	-8.96%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.41%	</td>	<td align="center">	-1.18%	</td>	<td align="center">	8.44%	</td>	<td align="center">	2.70%	</td>	<td align="center">	2.29%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.13%	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons. Stap.	</td>	<td align="center">	10.02%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.74%	</td>	<td align="center">	-4.52%	</td>	<td align="center">	-10.49%	</td>	<td align="center">	2.80%	</td>	<td align="center">	9.53%	</td>	<td align="center">	6.75%	</td>	<td align="center">	6.20%	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Telecom	</td>	<td align="center">	7.03%	</td>	<td align="center">	-5.85%	</td>	<td align="center">	-10.07%	</td>	<td align="center">	-25.47%	</td>	<td align="center">	24.79%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.24%	</td>	<td align="center">	-15.61%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.02%	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Industrials	</td>	<td align="center">	5.92%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.48%	</td>	<td align="center">	-20.54%	</td>	<td align="center">	-32.13%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.29%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.99%	</td>	<td align="center">	-18.29%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.82%	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Technology	</td>	<td align="center">	21.06%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.73%	</td>	<td align="center">	-23.31%	</td>	<td align="center">	-34.38%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.84%	</td>	<td align="center">	15.29%	</td>	<td align="center">	-16.25%	</td>	<td align="center">	22.25%	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Energy	</td>	<td align="center">	14.58%	</td>	<td align="center">	57.43%	</td>	<td align="center">	-25.36%	</td>	<td align="center">	-53.83%	</td>	<td align="center">	8.93%	</td>	<td align="center">	19.49%	</td>	<td align="center">	-45.51%	</td>	<td align="center">	35.18%	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons. Disc.	</td>	<td align="center">	-30.06%	</td>	<td align="center">	-39.34%	</td>	<td align="center">	-79.33%	</td>	<td align="center">	-54.75%	</td>	<td align="center">	-3.35%	</td>	<td align="center">	-37.48%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.03%	</td>	<td align="center">	65.20%	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Materials	</td>	<td align="center">	5.35%	</td>	<td align="center">	5.50%	</td>	<td align="center">	-86.21%	</td>	<td align="center">	-66.46%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.46%	</td>	<td align="center">	-10.17%	</td>	<td align="center">	-43.05%	</td>	<td align="center">	39.59%	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Financials	</td>	<td align="center">	-50.17%	</td>	<td align="center">	-65.39%	</td>	<td align="center">	-416.79%	</td>	<td align="center">	-47.22%	</td>	<td align="center">	-18.90%	</td>	<td align="center">	-75.50%	</td>	<td align="center">	68.66%	</td>	<td align="center">	72.40%	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	S&#38;P	</td>	<td align="center">	-5.77%	</td>	<td align="center">	-3.68%	</td>	<td align="center">	-37.87%	</td>	<td align="center">	-34.26%	</td>	<td align="center">	2.89%	</td>	<td align="center">	-10.36%	</td>	<td align="center">	-14.27%	</td>	<td align="center">	25.26%	</td>
</tr></table>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="center">

<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tr> <th COLSPAN="8"><b>Total Net Income (Reported)</b></th> </tr>
<tr bgcolor="#A2D39C"><td align="left"><b><u>	Sector	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q4 '08	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q4 '07	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q3 '08	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q3 '07	</u></b></td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Energy	</td>	<td align="center">	$22,803 	</td>	<td align="center">	$30,549 	</td>	<td align="center">	$41,794 	</td>	<td align="center">	$26,547 	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Health Care	</td>	<td align="center">	$22,702 	</td>	<td align="center">	$21,008 	</td>	<td align="center">	$22,904 	</td>	<td align="center">	$21,596 	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Technology	</td>	<td align="center">	$18,446 	</td>	<td align="center">	$24,051 	</td>	<td align="center">	$20,909 	</td>	<td align="center">	$18,882 	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Industrials	</td>	<td align="center">	$18,051 	</td>	<td align="center">	$22,719 	</td>	<td align="center">	$21,048 	</td>	<td align="center">	$20,948 	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons. Stap.	</td>	<td align="center">	$10,140 	</td>	<td align="center">	$10,620 	</td>	<td align="center">	$11,889 	</td>	<td align="center">	$10,453 	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Telecom	</td>	<td align="center">	$5,634 	</td>	<td align="center">	$6,265 	</td>	<td align="center">	$5,908 	</td>	<td align="center">	$6,275 	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Utilities	</td>	<td align="center">	$3,496 	</td>	<td align="center">	$3,349 	</td>	<td align="center">	$5,121 	</td>	<td align="center">	$5,625 	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons. Disc.	</td>	<td align="center">	$1,319 	</td>	<td align="center">	$6,379 	</td>	<td align="center">	$4,654 	</td>	<td align="center">	$7,672 	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Materials	</td>	<td align="center">	$673 	</td>	<td align="center">	$4,883 	</td>	<td align="center">	$5,869 	</td>	<td align="center">	$5,563 	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Financials	</td>	<td align="center">	($18,904)	</td>	<td align="center">	$5,967 	</td>	<td align="center">	$11,818 	</td>	<td align="center">	$34,150 	</td>
</tr><tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	S&#38;P	</td>	<td align="center">	$84,361 	</td>	<td align="center">	$135,788 	</td>	<td align="center">	$151,915 	</td>	<td align="center">	$157,712 	</td>
</tr></table>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="center">

<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tr> <th COLSPAN="9"><b>Total Net Income Growth (Not Reported)</b></th> </tr>
<tr bgcolor="#A2D39C"><td align="left"><b><u>	Sector	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q2 '08 A	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q3 '08 A	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q4 '08 E	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q1 '09 E	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2007 A	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2008 E	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2009 E	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2010 E	</u></b></td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Financials	</td>	<td align="center">	-69.07%	</td>	<td align="center">	-186.93%	</td>	<td align="center">	636.57%	</td>	<td align="center">	1926.89%	</td>	<td align="center">	-13.08%	</td>	<td align="center">	-90.34%	</td>	<td align="center">	483.10%	</td>	<td align="center">	9.89%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Health Care	</td>	<td align="center">	9.07%	</td>	<td align="center">	14.69%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.56%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.27%	</td>	<td align="center">	17.17%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.44%	</td>	<td align="center">	9.86%	</td>	<td align="center">	14.36%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Utilities	</td>	<td align="center">	5.50%	</td>	<td align="center">	-1.40%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.07%	</td>	<td align="center">	-7.59%	</td>	<td align="center">	14.04%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.64%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.89%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.97%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Industrials	</td>	<td align="center">	9.51%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.84%	</td>	<td align="center">	1.90%	</td>	<td align="center">	17.24%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.43%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.54%	</td>	<td align="center">	-10.26%	</td>	<td align="center">	-0.06%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons. Stap.	</td>	<td align="center">	-6.10%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.11%	</td>	<td align="center">	-1.44%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.67%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.43%	</td>	<td align="center">	14.28%	</td>	<td align="center">	5.29%	</td>	<td align="center">	9.48%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Technology	</td>	<td align="center">	7.86%	</td>	<td align="center">	-2.37%	</td>	<td align="center">	-23.80%	</td>	<td align="center">	-26.68%	</td>	<td align="center">	14.21%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.07%	</td>	<td align="center">	-11.74%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.78%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Energy	</td>	<td align="center">	32.54%	</td>	<td align="center">	47.46%	</td>	<td align="center">	-32.20%	</td>	<td align="center">	-32.32%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.67%	</td>	<td align="center">	19.11%	</td>	<td align="center">	-29.06%	</td>	<td align="center">	24.18%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Materials	</td>	<td align="center">	13.01%	</td>	<td align="center">	-16.31%	</td>	<td align="center">	-54.85%	</td>	<td align="center">	-26.94%	</td>	<td align="center">	-3.67%	</td>	<td align="center">	-3.98%	</td>	<td align="center">	-15.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	30.70%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons. Disc.	</td>	<td align="center">	-80.17%	</td>	<td align="center">	-48.21%	</td>	<td align="center">	-61.14%	</td>	<td align="center">	-53.30%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.70%	</td>	<td align="center">	-62.10%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.48%	</td>	<td align="center">	116.18%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Telecom	</td>	<td align="center">	-40.48%	</td>	<td align="center">	-63.43%	</td>	<td align="center">	-66.71%	</td>	<td align="center">	-41.87%	</td>	<td align="center">	-6.35%	</td>	<td align="center">	-49.52%	</td>	<td align="center">	-28.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	-11.34%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	S&#38;P	</td>	<td align="center">	-28.45%	</td>	<td align="center">	-39.27%	</td>	<td align="center">	-13.71%	</td>	<td align="center">	-7.54%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.56%	</td>	<td align="center">	-23.24%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.39%	</td>	<td align="center">	21.23%	</td></tr>
</table>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="center">

<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tr> <th COLSPAN="9"><b>Total Net Income Growth (Not Reported)</b></th> </tr>
<tr bgcolor="#A2D39C"><td align="left"><b><u>	Sector	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q2 '08 A	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q3 '08 A	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q4 '08 E	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Q1 '09 E	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2007 A	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2008 E	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2009 E	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2010 E	</u></b></td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Health Care	</td>	<td align="center">	8.84%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.07%	</td>	<td align="center">	8.60%	</td>	<td align="center">	-3.40%	</td>	<td align="center">	19.76%	</td>	<td align="center">	8.81%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.72%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.96%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Utilities	</td>	<td align="center">	4.11%	</td>	<td align="center">	-5.99%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.22%	</td>	<td align="center">	-3.70%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.62%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.48%	</td>	<td align="center">	2.94%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.43%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons. Stap.	</td>	<td align="center">	2.04%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.45%	</td>	<td align="center">	-3.14%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.04%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.23%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.82%	</td>	<td align="center">	6.03%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.81%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Telecom	</td>	<td align="center">	-1.11%	</td>	<td align="center">	-15.97%	</td>	<td align="center">	-19.08%	</td>	<td align="center">	-27.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	18.24%	</td>	<td align="center">	-5.56%	</td>	<td align="center">	-16.72%	</td>	<td align="center">	5.61%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Industrials	</td>	<td align="center">	6.23%	</td>	<td align="center">	1.08%	</td>	<td align="center">	-19.11%	</td>	<td align="center">	-28.63%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.07%	</td>	<td align="center">	1.75%	</td>	<td align="center">	-17.65%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.14%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Technology	</td>	<td align="center">	17.37%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.46%	</td>	<td align="center">	-23.42%	</td>	<td align="center">	-32.32%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.67%	</td>	<td align="center">	14.48%	</td>	<td align="center">	-15.14%	</td>	<td align="center">	20.09%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Energy	</td>	<td align="center">	16.25%	</td>	<td align="center">	56.44%	</td>	<td align="center">	-26.09%	</td>	<td align="center">	-51.51%	</td>	<td align="center">	9.12%	</td>	<td align="center">	19.45%	</td>	<td align="center">	-43.78%	</td>	<td align="center">	33.72%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons. Disc.	</td>	<td align="center">	-58.72%	</td>	<td align="center">	-43.68%	</td>	<td align="center">	-69.01%	</td>	<td align="center">	-53.80%	</td>	<td align="center">	1.06%	</td>	<td align="center">	-51.47%	</td>	<td align="center">	5.45%	</td>	<td align="center">	87.40%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Materials	</td>	<td align="center">	6.18%	</td>	<td align="center">	2.03%	</td>	<td align="center">	-80.94%	</td>	<td align="center">	-61.98%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.15%	</td>	<td align="center">	-9.40%	</td>	<td align="center">	-39.33%	</td>	<td align="center">	37.94%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Financials	</td>	<td align="center">	-53.87%	</td>	<td align="center">	-89.80%	</td>	<td align="center">	-324.04%	</td>	<td align="center">	-22.16%	</td>	<td align="center">	-17.78%	</td>	<td align="center">	-78.53%	</td>	<td align="center">	106.81%	</td>	<td align="center">	56.18%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	S&#38;P	</td>	<td align="center">	-10.95%	</td>	<td align="center">	-11.57%	</td>	<td align="center">	-32.67%	</td>	<td align="center">	-28.53%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.26%	</td>	<td align="center">	-13.26%	</td>	<td align="center">	-9.95%	</td>	<td align="center">	24.30%	</td></tr>
</table>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Scorecard and Median EPS Growth Rates</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<ul>
<li>Median EPS growth of 326 firms reporting so far is -6.8%
</li><li>Surprise ratio 1.70, median surprise 2.2%, both below normal
</li><li>Health Care still healthy with 10.1% growth, others anemic or down
</li><li>Health Care, Industrials doing well on Surprise front
</li><li>Nine sectors expected to be negative in 1Q
</li><li>Remaining firms expected to be down 9.5% in 4Q
</li></ul>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Positive surprises still out number disappointments, but at only about half the ratio that we became accustomed to seeing during the good times. CEOs learned long ago that it is better to under promise and over deliver, and thus keep the guidance to the analysts conservative.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The overall picture when we measure earnings based on median year-over-year EPS growth is not quite as bleak as on a total net income basis. During the first three quarters of 2008, firms were still buying back stock at a fairly aggressive pace (although not as aggressively as in 2007, fourth-quarter data is not out yet), which helps boost EPS by shrinking the denominator, where that effect is not present in the total net income data. Also the decline in total net income is in part been driven by some huge losses at some mega firms, most notably in the financial sector.

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="center">

<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tr> <th COLSPAN="10"><b>Fourth-Quarter Scorecard (Reported)</b><font size="2"></font></th> </tr>
<tr bgcolor="#A2D39C"><td align="left"><b><u>	Sector	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	4Q '08 Growth (A)	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	1Q '09 Growth (E)	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2008 Growth (A)	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2009 Growth (E)	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2010 Growth (E)	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	% Report	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Median % Surprise	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	# Pos Surprise	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	# Neg Surprise	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	# Match	</u></b></td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Healthcare	</td>	<td align="center">	10.13%	</td>	<td align="center">	6.36%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.73%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.37%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.84%	</td>	<td align="center">	68.52%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.11%	</td>	<td align="center">	25	</td>	<td align="center">	4	</td>	<td align="center">	8	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Utilities	</td>	<td align="center">	2.45%	</td>	<td align="center">	-1.81%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.60%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.10%	</td>	<td align="center">	8.46%	</td>	<td align="center">	41.18%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.12%	</td>	<td align="center">	8	</td>	<td align="center">	4	</td>	<td align="center">	2	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Energy	</td>	<td align="center">	1.81%	</td>	<td align="center">	-24.88%	</td>	<td align="center">	20.30%	</td>	<td align="center">	-37.69%	</td>	<td align="center">	20.43%	</td>	<td align="center">	66.67%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.04%	</td>	<td align="center">	14	</td>	<td align="center">	10	</td>	<td align="center">	2	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Industrial	</td>	<td align="center">	0.89%	</td>	<td align="center">	-18.53%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.32%	</td>	<td align="center">	-11.29%	</td>	<td align="center">	9.12%	</td>	<td align="center">	81.36%	</td>	<td align="center">	2.39%	</td>	<td align="center">	30	</td>	<td align="center">	8	</td>	<td align="center">	10	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Tech	</td>	<td align="center">	-6.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	-26.60%	</td>	<td align="center">	19.09%	</td>	<td align="center">	-15.15%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.04%	</td>	<td align="center">	76.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	35	</td>	<td align="center">	17	</td>	<td align="center">	5	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons. Stap.	</td>	<td align="center">	-6.98%	</td>	<td align="center">	-3.13%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.11%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.28%	</td>	<td align="center">	8.31%	</td>	<td align="center">	55.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	2.24%	</td>	<td align="center">	14	</td>	<td align="center">	6	</td>	<td align="center">	2	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Telecom	</td>	<td align="center">	-9.86%	</td>	<td align="center">	-11.11%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.03%	</td>	<td align="center">	-5.10%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.16%	</td>	<td align="center">	33.33%	</td>	<td align="center">	-1.61%	</td>	<td align="center">	0	</td>	<td align="center">	2	</td>	<td align="center">	1	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons. Disc.	</td>	<td align="center">	-31.13%	</td>	<td align="center">	-17.39%	</td>	<td align="center">	-7.88%	</td>	<td align="center">	-7.58%	</td>	<td align="center">	9.01%	</td>	<td align="center">	52.50%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.83%	</td>	<td align="center">	26	</td>	<td align="center">	14	</td>	<td align="center">	2	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Financial	</td>	<td align="center">	-39.83%	</td>	<td align="center">	-38.86%	</td>	<td align="center">	-21.79%	</td>	<td align="center">	-0.91%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.99%	</td>	<td align="center">	69.14%	</td>	<td align="center">	-12.13%	</td>	<td align="center">	17	</td>	<td align="center">	35	</td>	<td align="center">	4	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Materials	</td>	<td align="center">	-55.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	-60.99%	</td>	<td align="center">	-4.89%	</td>	<td align="center">	-27.83%	</td>	<td align="center">	16.80%	</td>	<td align="center">	72.41%	</td>	<td align="center">	6.45%	</td>	<td align="center">	13	</td>	<td align="center">	7	</td>	<td align="center">	1	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	S&#38;P 500	</td>	<td align="center">	-6.82%	</td>	<td align="center">	-15.47%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.25%	</td>	<td align="center">	-5.79%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.39%	</td>	<td align="center">	65.20%	</td>	<td align="center">	2.22%	</td>	<td align="center">	182	</td>	<td align="center">	107	</td>	<td align="center">	37	</td></tr>
</table>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="center">


<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tr> <th COLSPAN="6"><b>Fourth-Quarter EPS Growth (Yet-to-Report)</b></th> </tr>
<tr bgcolor="#A2D39C"><td align="left"><b><u>	Sector	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	4Q '08 Growth (E)	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	1Q '09 Growth (E)	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2008 Growth (E)	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2009 Growth (E)	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2010 Growth (E)	</u></b></td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Healthcare	</td>	<td align="center">	5.13%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.44%	</td>	<td align="center">	17.86%	</td>	<td align="center">	16.89%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.75%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons. Stap.	</td>	<td align="center">	3.95%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.40%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.10%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.56%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.30%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Utilities	</td>	<td align="center">	3.41%	</td>	<td align="center">	5.62%	</td>	<td align="center">	-0.78%	</td>	<td align="center">	9.18%	</td>	<td align="center">	8.19%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Telecom	</td>	<td align="center">	-1.23%	</td>	<td align="center">	-10.09%	</td>	<td align="center">	29.51%	</td>	<td align="center">	5.31%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.79%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Industrial	</td>	<td align="center">	-3.70%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	9.71%	</td>	<td align="center">	15.29%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.62%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Energy	</td>	<td align="center">	-11.05%	</td>	<td align="center">	-28.21%	</td>	<td align="center">	30.91%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.31%	</td>	<td align="center">	25.57%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Financial	</td>	<td align="center">	-13.28%	</td>	<td align="center">	-13.10%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.52%	</td>	<td align="center">	6.87%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.97%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons. Disc.	</td>	<td align="center">	-26.10%	</td>	<td align="center">	-21.45%	</td>	<td align="center">	15.09%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.61%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.68%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Tech	</td>	<td align="center">	-28.35%	</td>	<td align="center">	-10.17%	</td>	<td align="center">	8.71%	</td>	<td align="center">	22.02%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.93%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Materials	</td>	<td align="center">	-42.18%	</td>	<td align="center">	-29.84%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.72%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.80%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.58%	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	S&#38;P 500	</td>	<td align="center">	-9.51%	</td>	<td align="center">	-6.06%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.27%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.89%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.71%	</td></tr>
</table>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>The Zacks Revisions Ratio: 2009 </b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<ul>
<li>Revisions ratio for full S&#38;P 500 up to 0.19, unchanged from last week
</li><li>Health Care the "strongest" as positive surprises help it
</li><li>9 sectors have at least 3 cuts for every increase
</li><li>34.4% of all firms see consensus earnings estimate decline by more than 10%, 22.4% more than 20%
</li><li>Ratio of firms with rising to falling consensus earnings estimates at 0.18, unchanged
</li><li>Total number of revisions (4 week total) up to 3,594 from 2,626 last week (36.8%)
</li><li>Increases up to 578 from 410 (40.9%), cuts up to 3,016 from 2,216 (36.1%)
</li><li>Estimate activity picking up sharply, nearing seasonal peak
</li></ul>

</p><p ALIGN="left">

Despite five of the sectors recording at least twice as many positive surprises as disappointments, it is not translating into upward estimate revisions for 2009. Granted, unlike the other quarters, there is no automatic reason for 2009 estimates to rise due to a positive surprise in the fourth quarter of 2008, the way there is if there is a positive surprise in the first quarter of 2009. However, the disparity is pretty stark.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The Health Care sector is the best of the bunch, but even there, estimate cuts are running at almost 2x estimate increases despite positive surprises outnumbering disappointments more than five to one. There are a few names where positive surprises have translated into higher estimates, like <b>McKesson Corporation</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MCK">MCK</a>) and <b>Forest Laboratories</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/FRX">FRX</a>), but they are the exception, rather than the rule.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
While the revisions ratio has improved from what we were seeing a month ago, it is still in horrendously negative territory. Furthermore, negative revisions are occurring on a far higher overall volume of estimates.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The size of the estimate cuts is awful, with more than one third of all S&#38;P 500 firms seeing their consensus earnings estimate fall by more than 10% over the last month and more than one-fifth seeing greater than a 20% decline. The economy is still accelerating to the downside, so it seems unlikely that the cutting will stop anytime soon.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Not surprisingly the relatively defensive Health Care and Consumer Staples sectors are holding up better than the cyclical sectors like the Industrials and Materials. Financials they are in their own separate hell.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="center">

<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tr bgcolor="#A2D39C"><td align="left"><b><u>	SECTOR	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Avg. 4wk Change FY1	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Revisions Ratio: #ests up/# ests dn 4 wk	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	# Of Firms with FY1 EPS 4wk Increase	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	# Of Firms with FY1 EPS 4wk Decrease	</u></b></td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Health Care	</td>	<td align="center">	-2.76%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.52	</td>	<td align="center">	17 	</td>	<td align="center">	37 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Consumer Staple	</td>	<td align="center">	-4.33%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.28	</td>	<td align="center">	9 	</td>	<td align="center">	30 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Technology	</td>	<td align="center">	-12.41%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.26	</td>	<td align="center">	11 	</td>	<td align="center">	62 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Consumer Disc	</td>	<td align="center">	-10.30%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.21	</td>	<td align="center">	11 	</td>	<td align="center">	68 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Utilities	</td>	<td align="center">	-3.56%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.21	</td>	<td align="center">	8 	</td>	<td align="center">	26 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Energy	</td>	<td align="center">	-20.68%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.14	</td>	<td align="center">	2 	</td>	<td align="center">	37 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Telecom	</td>	<td align="center">	-4.65%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.11	</td>	<td align="center">	1 	</td>	<td align="center">	8 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Materials	</td>	<td align="center">	-18.64%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.11	</td>	<td align="center">	2 	</td>	<td align="center">	26 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Financial Services	</td>	<td align="center">	-12.97%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.10	</td>	<td align="center">	10 	</td>	<td align="center">	71 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Industrials	</td>	<td align="center">	-11.65%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.08	</td>	<td align="center">	5 	</td>	<td align="center">	51 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	S&#38;P 500	</td>	<td align="center">	-10.56%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.19	</td>	<td align="center">	76 	</td>	<td align="center">	416 	</td></tr>
</table>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>The Zacks Revisions Ratio: 2010</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<ul>
<li>Revisions ratio rises to 0.22 from 0.20 last week
</li><li>More than 3 cuts per increase for 9 sectors, more than 4 per increase in 6 sectors
</li><li>Telecom, Health Care the "strongest"; Industrials, Energy, Materials, Financials and Tech all very weak
</li><li>Only 21 total revisions in Telecom
</li><li>Ratio of rising to falling consensus earnings estimates falls to 0.20 from 0.26
</li><li>Total number of revisions rises to 1,479 from 1,127 (31.2%)
</li><li>Estimate increases rise to 264 from 184 (43.5%), cuts rise to 1215 from 943 (28.8%)
</li><li>Sample size of 2010 revisions is thin, but starting off weak
</li><li>Mean estimates to be affected by new estimates as much as revisions
</li></ul>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
While the total net income table above shows expectations of a very healthy rebound in profits in 2010 of 24.3%, don't start counting those chickens. Analysts are cutting their 2010 estimates at almost the same pace that they are cutting their 2009 estimates. If the two fall in tandem, the growth rate will not change, but it will be off a much lower base.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
As with 2009, the estimate cuts are widespread, with Health Care being the only place where cuts are running at less than 2:1 over increases, in every other sector they are running at more than 3:1.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The size of the cuts is also very substantial. In 5 sectors, the average change in the consensus earnings estimate over the last month is in the double digits, and that is after we have removed all the declines of greater than 100%. The declines in the Energy sector look particularly bad, with major firms like <b>Exxon Mobil Corporation</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/XOM">XOM</a>), <b>Chevron Corporation</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CVX">CVX</a>) and <b>ConocoPhillips</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/COP">COP</a>) all registering double digit declines. Given the scale of their operations that translates to billions of dollars of lower expected earnings.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="center">

<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="80%">
<tr bgcolor="#A2D39C"><td align="left"><b><u>	SECTOR	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	4wk Change FY2	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	(Sum[FY2 Rev 4wk Increase]) / (Sum[FY2 Rev 4wk Decrease)	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	# Of Firms with FY2 EPS 4wk Increase	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	# Of Firms with FY2 EPS 4wk Decrease	</u></b></td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Health Care	</td>	<td align="center">	-2.92%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.54	</td>	<td align="center">	12 	</td>	<td align="center">	39 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Telecom	</td>	<td align="center">	-5.69%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.31	</td>	<td align="center">	2 	</td>	<td align="center">	6 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Consumer Discr	</td>	<td align="center">	-10.02%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.31	</td>	<td align="center">	15 	</td>	<td align="center">	58 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Consumer Staples	</td>	<td align="center">	-2.94%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.29	</td>	<td align="center">	7 	</td>	<td align="center">	25 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Utilities	</td>	<td align="center">	-3.37%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.23	</td>	<td align="center">	7 	</td>	<td align="center">	20 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Materials	</td>	<td align="center">	-15.20%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.22	</td>	<td align="center">	6 	</td>	<td align="center">	22 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Technology	</td>	<td align="center">	-14.88%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.18	</td>	<td align="center">	7 	</td>	<td align="center">	62 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Energy	</td>	<td align="center">	-16.25%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.13	</td>	<td align="center">	3 	</td>	<td align="center">	35 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Financial Services	</td>	<td align="center">	-15.42%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.11	</td>	<td align="center">	10 	</td>	<td align="center">	67 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Industrials	</td>	<td align="center">	-9.36%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.08	</td>	<td align="center">	7 	</td>	<td align="center">	47 	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	S&#38;P 500	</td>	<td align="center">	-10.44%	</td>	<td align="center">	0.22	</td>	<td align="center">	76 	</td>	<td align="center">	381 	</td></tr>
</table>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Earnings Shares and P/Es</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<ul>
<li>P/Es are too low since earnings estimates are too high
</li><li>Earnings Shares, including historical, based on current make up of S&#38;P 500
</li><li>Disappearance of losers like Merrill, Wachovia and National City distorts Financials 2008 earnings share, with them it is under 4%.
</li><li>Health Care expected to take earnings crown from Energy in 2009, keep it in 2010
</li><li>Energy's earnings share expected to plunge to 14.2% from 21.4%
</li><li>Financials expected to dramatically grow earnings share in 2009 from depressed 2008 levels, but more write-offs are likely, and expected share is shrinking
</li><li>Consumer Discretionary market cap share far above earnings shares (overvalued?)
</li><li>S&#38;P 500's P/E of 12.99 equates to earnings yield of 7.69%, very attractive relative to 10 year T-note yield of 2.98%.
</li><li>T-note rates are rising and more realistic earnings yields of near 6.50% based on lower earnings means the spread, while still attractive is not overwhelming.
</li></ul>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="center">

<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="80%">
<tr> <th COLSPAN="7"><b>Earnings Shares and P/Es</b></th> </tr>
<tr bgcolor="#A2D39C"><td align="left"><b><u>	Sector	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2008%	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2009%	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	2010%	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Market Cap%	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	P/E 08	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	P/E 09	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	P/E 10	</u></b></td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Technology	</td>	<td align="center">	15.13%	</td>	<td align="center">	14.72%	</td>	<td align="center">	14.23%	</td>	<td align="center">	17.30%	</td>	<td align="center">	13	</td>	<td align="center">	15.27	</td>	<td align="center">	12.73	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Health Care	</td>	<td align="center">	14.80%	</td>	<td align="center">	17.22%	</td>	<td align="center">	15.54%	</td>	<td align="center">	15.63%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.01	</td>	<td align="center">	11.79	</td>	<td align="center">	10.53	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Energy	</td>	<td align="center">	21.35%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.93%	</td>	<td align="center">	15.02%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.80%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.35	</td>	<td align="center">	12.86	</td>	<td align="center">	9.62	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons Staple	</td>	<td align="center">	11.83%	</td>	<td align="center">	14.19%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.33%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.72%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.19	</td>	<td align="center">	12.56	</td>	<td align="center">	11.65	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Industrials	</td>	<td align="center">	12.75%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.08%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.35%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.09%	</td>	<td align="center">	9	</td>	<td align="center">	10.85	</td>	<td align="center">	10.21	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Financials	</td>	<td align="center">	8.13%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.69%	</td>	<td align="center">	14.72%	</td>	<td align="center">	9.90%	</td>	<td align="center">	13.84	</td>	<td align="center">	11	</td>	<td align="center">	7.04	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Cons Disc.	</td>	<td align="center">	4.29%	</td>	<td align="center">	5.02%	</td>	<td align="center">	7.58%	</td>	<td align="center">	8.47%	</td>	<td align="center">	22.46	</td>	<td align="center">	21.92	</td>	<td align="center">	11.7	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Utilities	</td>	<td align="center">	4.17%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.91%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.32%	</td>	<td align="center">	4.44%	</td>	<td align="center">	12.12	</td>	<td align="center">	11.75	</td>	<td align="center">	10.77	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Telecom	</td>	<td align="center">	3.97%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.76%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.20%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.59%	</td>	<td align="center">	10.3	</td>	<td align="center">	12.43	</td>	<td align="center">	11.77	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Materials	</td>	<td align="center">	3.59%	</td>	<td align="center">	2.47%	</td>	<td align="center">	2.71%	</td>	<td align="center">	3.06%	</td>	<td align="center">	9.7	</td>	<td align="center">	16.09	</td>	<td align="center">	11.82	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	S&#38;P 500	</td>	<td align="center">	100.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	100.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	100.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	100.00%	</td>	<td align="center">	11.37	</td>	<td align="center">	12.99	</td>	<td align="center">	10.47	</td></tr>
</table>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="center">

<img src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1234201673.jpg"/>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="center">

<img src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1234202414.jpg"/>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Neil Malkin contributed significantly to this report.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Data in this report, unless stated otherwise, is through the close on Thursday 1/29/2009
</p><p ALIGN="left"><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZRANK&#38;t=CVX">"CVX" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZRANK&#38;t=COP">"COP" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZRANK&#38;t=XOM">"XOM" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZRANK&#38;t=FRX">"FRX" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZRANK&#38;t=MCK">"MCK" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/not-much-time-to-save-earnings-season-earnings-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wynn Resorts (NASDAQ:WYNN): Downgraded to Underweight, $21 tgt at Keybanc</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/wynn-resorts-nasdaqwynn-downgraded-to-underweight-21-tgt-at-keybanc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/wynn-resorts-nasdaqwynn-downgraded-to-underweight-21-tgt-at-keybanc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mgm mirage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wynn Resorts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-1956150947912582126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"Keybanc is out with a downgrade on span style="font-weight: bold;"Wynn Resorts (NASDAQ:WYNN) /spandowngrading the shares to Underweight from Hold after the co announced substantial labor cost cutting initiatives for its Las Vegas properties.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;"Firm notes this is the first time they can ever remember this management team taking such drastic measures./span In addition, on a conference call Steve Wynn commented that spending (labor, marketing, promotions,etc.) on the Encore opening was of a magnitude consistent with a boom time economy. These two data points combined with a severe recessionary climate in both of WYNN's markets cause them to lower their 4Q08 earnings estimate and reevaluate their investment opinion on these shares.br /br /Keybanc is lowering 4Q08 EPS estimate to $0.40 from $0.45 (consensus is at $0.52) and believes there are few companies in the gaming sector with near term prospects and catalysts. Longer term, Wynn Resorts has among the best growth pipelines in the industry. Between 150 well located acres in Las Vegas and a 52-acre site on the Cotai strip in Macau, WYNN should be set for the next five to 10 years growth. That being said, the skittish investment climate today does not augur well for any gaming company and they are afraid WYNN's shares will under perform over the near term. The combination of negative group psychology, today's revelations and our new lower than consensus estimates, necessitates us re-instituting an UNDERWEIGHT investment rating on WYNN, with a downside price target of $21.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls:/span This stuff does not look good. I think the stock can go to $20 in a jiffy if current sentiment prevails in the n-t. Definitely not saying WYNN is similar to LVS or MGM but I'm just hard pressed to see any meaningful buyers step up around here.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Couple of pts of downside is what I think may be in store for WYNN today./spanbr /br /Oh and btw, Merrill/BAC is lowering their tgt on span style="font-weight: bold;"MGM Mirage (NYSE:MGM) /spanto $5 from $11.br //div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/wynn-resorts-nasdaqwynn-downgraded-to-underweight-21-tgt-at-keybanc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware (NYSE:VMW): Downgraded to Underperform, $15 tgt at Merrill/BAC</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/vmware-nysevmw-downgraded-to-underperform-15-tgt-at-merrillbac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/vmware-nysevmw-downgraded-to-underperform-15-tgt-at-merrillbac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap software;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-1056356244777939238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"Merrill is lowering their target on VMW from $31 to $15 based on 15x new CY09 EPS of $1.00 (vs. old $1.12), -5% y/y. The target equates to ~7x EV/ 4Q08 maintenance revenue run rate, in-line with ORCL. The new EPS of $1.00 is based on 10% decline in license revs and +70bps OM. The 15x multiple is a 25% premium to large cap software (ORCL and SAP) that have comparable license decline and modest EPS growth.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Q4:08 results in line but implied C09 guidance negative surprise/spanbr /span style="font-weight: bold;"/spanbr /License revs of $314.8mn (+11% y/y) were in-line. However, ex-EA (enterprise agreements) and license backlog, license growth of an estimated 5% is muted for a seasonally strong Q. Implied license growth in upcoming seasonally slow Q109 is -11%, leading to -11% for the year under normal seasonality vs. +15% previously. Economic headwinds could make it tougher to win EAs (peaked at 23% of Q408 bookings, key license driver) which has been winding up growth recently. Unwinding to reasonable level could dampen near term growth.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls:/span Would not be surprised to see VMW trade below $21 level today, possibly closer to $20 level. What this market hates the most is companies not giving guidance. Thats what VMW did.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"PS: /spanspan style="font-weight: bold;" After looking at  the market and   the pre-market action I'm not entirely sure this one will collapse they way I initially thought. I would scratch the trade here./spanbr //div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/vmware-nysevmw-downgraded-to-underperform-15-tgt-at-merrillbac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed to Backstop Bank of America Losses</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/fed-to-backstop-bank-of-america-losses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/fed-to-backstop-bank-of-america-losses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael E. Brisky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backstop Bank of America Losses;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[br /br /blockquoteThe government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of the Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deposit Insurance Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Citigroup;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FULL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Price;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill/a.br /br /blockquoteThe government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael brisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-819581243324579563.post-4417963725412256394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More trouble for another big bank.  First Citigroup is breaking up, which appears necessary.  Now Bank of America a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087amp;sid=aQHIoX4ejmAgamp;refer=home"can't hold together their purchase of Merrill/a.br /br /blockquoteThe government said earlier today it will invest $20 billion in Bank of  America and guarantee $118 billion of assets to help the company absorb Merrill  and prevent the financial crisis from deepening.  pThe agreement is part of a commitment to “support financial-market  stability,” the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit  Insurance Corp. said in a joint statement shortly after midnight in Washington.  /p pAbout three-quarters of the federal aid is intended to cushion Merrill’s  losses, with the rest for Bank of America, Chief Financial Officer Joe Price told investors during today’s conference call. /p/blockquotepbr //ppThis is not a surprise.  If we remember that crazy weekend when Lehman went under, and all the investment banks were on the verge of following, we'll know why this is happening.  The government was under the gun, and they really didn't want to lose another bank.  So Bank of America stepped up and agreed to buy Merrill.  I can guarantee it was one of those deals where the government basically said, "if you do this deal, we'll do whatever is necessary to help you make it work."  So, now that they need help, its no surprise they are getting it.  Just like when no one could figure out why Warren Buffett got great terms on his deal with Goldman Sachs.  Same deal.  They guaranteed that they wouldn't let Goldman fail.  Bottom line here is that when capital is very scarce, if you've got it, you can get terms which protect against failure./ppWe're continuing the pattern of privatizing gains, and socializing losses.  Its horrible for taxpayers, but once we've committed to this path, its hard to get off it.  I anticiapate more of this happening in the future. br //p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/fed-to-backstop-bank-of-america-losses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dividend Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-dividend-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-dividend-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bondholders;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Franks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bofa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Dodd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of the Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QVM Group LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qvmgroup.com/invest/?p=1340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama said he will order the Treasury Department to limit dividends paid by commercial banks and investment banks that receive “exceptional assistance” from the government to “de minimis amounts&#8221;.
That order will not likely receive any material resistance in Congress.  Both Barney Franks and Chris Dodd have expressed similar views in the last several weeks.
Here are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-dividend-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energizer (NYSE:ENR): Downgraded to Underperform at Merrill/Bac</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/energizer-nyseenr-downgraded-to-underperform-at-merrillbac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/energizer-nyseenr-downgraded-to-underperform-at-merrillbac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-7766123857993775920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"Merrill Lynch/Bank of America is out with a downgrade on span style="font-weight: bold;"Energizer (NYSE:ENR)/span to Underperform from Buy, lowering tgt to $59 from $74.br /br /Firm notes the downgrade is consistent with a shift toward more defensive companies with less leverage for ’09, and is based on the following: 1) further macro deterioration and related risk of retailer inventory de-stocking, 2) the 75% run the shares have seen, and 3) the fact that ENR no longer trades at a deep discount to the bottom of the household products / personal care (HPC) group.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Lowering EPS ests to $5.29 for ’09, $5.82 for ‘10/spanbr /Firm is lowering their FY09 EPS est to $5.29 (-13% y/y) from $6.01, based on a 40bp cut to sales growth, a 70bp cut to operating margin, and higher interest and other expense. They are now assuming that ENR fails to hold EPS flat y/y in FY09, which the company noted would be “a challenge” in its Q4 press release. So despite a slight pullback in the US$ and easing commodity costs since ENR last report, the worsening macro setting drives them to advocate taking some profits for those who bought at the bottom. FY10 est is now $5.82 (+10% y/y), down from $6.53, based on a lower base year and a higher y/y growth assumption.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls:/span ENR is a big mover and I suspect the stock will take a fairly sizable hit on this MLCO downgrade. I'm guessing the stock will trade pretty close to $50 level in the n-t.br //div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/energizer-nyseenr-downgraded-to-underperform-at-merrillbac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spending More Money</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/spending-more-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/spending-more-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Greenberg;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anheuser busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPS& Canadian Housing Starts;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Andrukonis;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fed-funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Trotter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HKD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Committee on Oversight;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Thain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koruna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLN;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salvation Army;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tribune Company;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VANCOUVER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=9835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pTurn back the clocks to 1950#8230;  Currencies rally on the day#8230;  Bank of Canada to cut rates today#8230;br /
Fed Funds to zero?                                     And Now#8230; Today#8217;s Pfennig!br /
Well#8230; It looks like the new president wants to spend more money#8230; Yes, President-elect Obama, presented his economic plan yesterday, and before doing so, issued a warning that the economy is going to get a lot worse before it gets better. His plan calls for a pledge to spend the most on infrastructure since the 1950#8217;s#8230; Now, let me say this#8230; The Big Boss, Frank Trotter, and I talk about this all the time#8230; To spend money on Financial Institutions and things that don#8217;t get used more than once like bullets and bombs, isn#8217;t our #8220;fave#8221;#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/spending-more-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trading Desks Like JPM Fail for this Reason</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/trading-desks-like-jpm-fail-for-this-reason/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/trading-desks-like-jpm-fail-for-this-reason/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Aferiat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finding new technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual trader;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Jones;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9446784.post-3756441778304031830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>I got this headline and article today:</div><div><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/11/05/17826/jpmorgan-cuts-prop-desk/" rel="bookmark" title="JPMorgan to cut prop desk"></a></div><blockquote><div><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/11/05/17826/jpmorgan-cuts-prop-desk/" rel="bookmark" title="JPMorgan to cut prop desk">JPMorgan to cut prop desk</a></div><div><br /></div><div>JPMorgan Chase is to <a title="FT" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/67dfbef0-aaa2-11dd-897c-000077b07658.html" target="_blank">scrap</a> its standalone proprietary trading desk, highlighting how the dearth of investment opportunities is prompting banks to retreat from in-house hedge funds that had thrived before the turmoil. People close to the situation said the decision to fold the 80-strong global proprietary trading unit into JPMorgan’s other trading operations could result in job losses.<p></p></div><p class="avpostmetadata" style="0.85em;">This entry was posted by Sam Jones  on Wednesday, November 5th, 2008 at 5:28</p></blockquote><div>Institutions closing their internal trading desks.  How is that possible given all their resources? Surely they are always at that intersection of bright minds, leading edge technology, and lots of money, right?  Wrong.  </div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="bold;">I argue that the institutions are failing for not keeping up with the latest tools and technology that often exists below their radar and outside the 4 walls of their IT department.  In this sense the individual trader may be succeeding (with tools like <a href="http://www.trade-ideas.com">Trade-Ideas</a>) where the institutions fail.</span></div><div><br /></div><div>Aside from money see how key assumptions about the advantages institutions maintain over individuals stand on a weak foundation.  <br /></div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="bold;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="large;">Minds Gone to Mush</span></span></div><div><br /></div><div>In these last few months (going on a year or so), the mighty institutions (e.g., BEAR, Merrill, etc.) fall pretty hard and the emporer runs around naked alot.  With the relative parity in access to primary sources of widely disseminated information, it's just as easy as the next guy to put 2 and 2 together and get 4.  Smarter people outside these institutions saw the writing on the wall. I'd say a mix of the 'blinding greed' of executives contributed to these failures combined with the inherent inertia of bureaucratic organizations (i.e., the CYA attitude of many employees, the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" day by day routine mentality).  This makes finding new technology almost impossible let alone trying to champion its use within the organization.  (How did Trade-Ideas ever land its <a href="http://www.trade-ideas.com/Partners.html">partners</a>?)</div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="bold;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="large;">Leading Edge of Blah</span></span></div><div><br /></div><div>I've seen too many trading floors with homemade platforms marketed as the "Ultimate Driving Machine" of applications.  Each of them had their moment of glory and each of them unknowingly saw it go by.  That's because a department of in-house developers and IT organizations make it their job to maintain the status quo.  At this they are very good - but innovate or build from scratch? </div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="bold;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="large;">The Value of Small Companies is their Innovation</span></span></div><div><br /></div><div>The cost and effort to develop something internally is staggering in its budget, time to implementation, and constantly changing scope.  Good companies I associate with know its better to buy these applications from the outside and integrate them rather than develop them internally on their own. </div><div><br /></div><div>Smaller companies (hey, like Trade-Ideas) fill this gap.  We just keep refusing to go to the dance. In the meantime our customers benefit because it's our niche focus and fast adapting development capabilities that allow us to constantly meet and exceed market demands on what our tools need to do.</div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="bold;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="large;">Related Articles:</span></span></div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="23px;"><a href="http://marketmovers.blogspot.com/2008/09/institutional-brokers-teeter-retail.html">Institutional Brokers Teeter, Retail Brokers Innovate</a></span><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="23px;"><a href="http://marketmovers.blogspot.com/2007/03/brokers-better-know-this-if-they-want.html">Brokers Better Know This If They Want to Keep You</a><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="23px;"><br /></span></div><div><br /></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/trading-desks-like-jpm-fail-for-this-reason/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday Morning Coffee</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/sunday-morning-coffee-26/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/sunday-morning-coffee-26/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Nusbaum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buck Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chip Carey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Varitek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Darling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statoil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8532070.post-8667984396846305502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZckZ-8naz0/SPphBDmColI/AAAAAAAABlY/o0K0_EIhQak/s1600-h/Iceland+074.jpg"><img style="pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZckZ-8naz0/SPphBDmColI/AAAAAAAABlY/o0K0_EIhQak/s400/Iceland+074.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Obviously too many things going on to cover them all so I thought I would try to hone in on a couple reader comments.<br /><br />One reader noted that I looked more tired in last week's video (buy signal) and less tired this week (sell signal?). If I were to be an indicator I would be incapable of recognizing it's value but have at it if you think there is something to it.<br /><br />I actually felt more wiped out this week due to being pulled in progressively more directions in terms of emails from work, media inquiries but not trading. If you've been reading this site for a while you know most of the work was done ages ago.<br /><br />The small portfolio tweaks are not usually time consuming. As the phone has been ringing for me a little more often it has been ringing for Joellyn a lot more often as apparently dog rescue issues have gone up as the stock market has gone down.<br /><br />Another reader asked a question about entering and exiting the market during what he calls a complex market. He believes in thinking of the current cycle as a complex bottom and although he tends to be shorter term in nature wonders if points of entry and exit take on additional importance right here.<br /><br />Well there's all sorts of things there I don't know. The first thing I think is buy and hold and whether that notion is dead. I've never thought it was dead dead but the tweak I have written about is <span style="italic;">buy and hope to hold</span>. When I first bought Bank of America (BAC) a few years ago I figured I'd never need to sell it. Then the merger with Merrill came along and I sold it. Had there been no MER merger I'm pretty sure I'd still own it.<br /><br />I'd love to be able to assemble a portfolio that never needed any changes but that is not realistic but that is my starting point in trying to answer the question. I do take a longer time frame than the reader and as a top down person I am more concerned the the exposure of the entire portfolio and reducing that exposure or increasing it depending on what I think the market is doing consistent with other more objective concepts I rely on.<br /><br />I've outlined the couple of across board trades I've done of late (a few long sales a while back, selling the double short, buying a little Statoil) but I would say I probably have the next three offensive and defensive moves planned, which I do or the order they might get done depends on what the market gives and to tie in with some comments yesterday, I could add a few names and still have a cash position most folks would consider defensive.<br /><br />There are a couple of things that are foremost on my mind these days. The most important ties in with down a lot. I'd been writing about trying to avoid big chunks of down a lot. We've now had down a lot (you can look at the quarterly recap videos to determine whether you think I was successful in trying to miss down a lot), many people are very afraid and there is a lot of questioning of the future of our financial system. Quite simply that describes a time to gear more toward entry than exit at the portfolio level.<br /><br />At the index level continued volatility, although maybe soon we only move in 4 and 5% increments, should be expected. Apparently David Rosenberg from Merrill thinks SPX 750 is in the cards. That is 190 points from here. In the context of a 1565 starting point, 190 points would be another 12% after already falling 40%. If you do not think this is the great depression revisited then you probably need to realize the vast majority of the decline is in.<br /><br />That does not mean that if we go up to 1050 this week that we don't go down to 850 the next week and scare the bejeezes out of everyone. And then that type of action repeats a few more times.<br /><br />At the stock level we should expect more wipeouts. If you have a 2% weight to a stock that goes to zero you don't really have a problem but most people put more than 2% in one name. I do think there needs to be a willingness to come out of any stock you own in this type of environment, BAC as a case in point for me.<br /><br />Market history shows us that buying some stock after a huge selloff that scares people has worked far more often than it hasn't.<br /><br />Exactly a <a href="http://randomroger.blogspot.com/2007/10/sunday-morning-coffee_20.html">year ago I mentioned JD Drew's grand slam</a> against Cleveland. He gad been having a dreadful time at the plate but all the while I kept telling Joellyn he would do something good. Last night was the exact same thing with Jason Varitek. He may not be a major league hitter anymore but when they flashed that 0-for the series stat, I knew the Rays were in trouble.<br /><br />Game 7 tonight which obviously the Sox have a shot at which is good but that means we have one more night of Chip Carey and Buck Martinez announcing (Ron Darling is nowhere near as bad as the other two, in fact Darling doesn't bug me in the least). In addition to not being able to judge flies balls as homers or not Carey also has trouble with fair and foul. I swear to you I could do a better job than him.<br /><br />The picture hearkens to a simpler time, 2006, in the Icelandic countryside.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/sunday-morning-coffee-26/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Earnings results and economic reports &#8211; Week 42.</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/earnings-results-and-economic-reports-week-42/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/earnings-results-and-economic-reports-week-42/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vlada Kynsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Altera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of NY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cit Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comerica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genuine Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honeywell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novellus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nucor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parker Hannifin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schlumberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonoco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supervalu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VF Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells fargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilmington Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xilinx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6675237082283386719.post-1785764615993801706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Monday:<br /></strong>Economic: NA<br />Earnings: Fastenal (FAST), XL Cap (XL)<br /><br /><strong>Tuesday:<br /></strong>Economic: NA<br />Earnings: J&#38;J (JNJ), Pepsi (PEP), Supervalu (SVU), WW Grainger (GWW), Altera (ALTR), CSX (CSX), Genentech (DNA), Intel (INTC), USANA (USNA)<br /><br /><strong>Wednesday:</strong><br />Economic: Weekly Crude,<br />Earnings: BlackRock (BLK), C Schwab (SCHW), Coke (KO), Delta (DAL), JP Morgan (JPM), St Jude (STJ), Wells Fargo (WFC), Badger (BMI), eBay (EBAY), Novellus (NVLS), Landstar (LSTR), Steel Dynamics (STLD), Xilinx (XLNX)<br /><br /><strong>Thursday:</strong><br />Economic: Weekly Claims, Wholesale Invs (0.4%)<br />Earnings: Bank of NY (BK), BB&#38;T (BBT), Citigroup (C), CIT Group (CIT), Continental (CAL), Cypress (CY), Harley (HOG), Hershey (HSY), Illinois Tool (ITW), Merrill (MER), Nokia (NOK), Nucor (NUE), Parker Hannifin (PH), Sherwin W (SHW), Sonoco (SON), Southwest (LUV), Sunpower (SPWRA), United Tech (UTX), Cap One (COF), Gilead (GILD), Google (GOOG), IBM (IBM), Intuitive Surgical (ISRG), Zions Banc (ZION)<br /><br /><strong>Friday:<br /></strong>Economic:<br />Earnings: Amcol (ACO), Comerica (CMA), Genuine Parts (GPC), Honeywell (HON), Schlumberger (SLB), VF Corp (VFC), Wilmington Trust (WL)<div class="blogger-post-footer">http://stockweb.blogspot.com/atom.xml</div>
<p><a href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/Mru9OCqN63FReL_n_sGHeKWuDd4/a"><img src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/Mru9OCqN63FReL_n_sGHeKWuDd4/i" border="0"/></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/Stockweb?a=ZixOvdjI"><img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/Stockweb?d=41" border="0"/></a>
</div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/earnings-results-and-economic-reports-week-42/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ETFs Grab More Market Share, Reach 35%</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/etfs-grab-more-market-share-reach-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/etfs-grab-more-market-share-reach-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndexUniverse Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange Traded Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ameristock/Victoria Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ascii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of NY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Suisse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hsbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[index universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iShares 
Lehman Aggregate Bond Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iShares Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Aggregate Bond Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Msci Eafe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Stock Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P 500 ETF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell 1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spdr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Eck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.indexuniverse.com://b8092aca491a8a300c2a8eb61f13887a</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--[if gte mso 9]&#62;-->
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
<!--[if gte mso 9]&#62;-->

<!--[if gte mso 10]&#62;-->

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}


<p>
September was a
disaster for the stock market in general, but not necessarily ETFs.
</p>

<p>
Exchange-traded funds continued to grow in prominence as
part of the overall U.S. equities market in September, reaching 35% of all
trading, up from the previous record-level of 31%, just reached in August,
according to National Stock Exchange data. The biggest part of that trading
story has been State Street Global Advisors' SPDRs family of ETFs, which for
the month of September represented approximately 50% of all ETF trading volume,
with close to $1.4 trillion of the nearly $2.8 trillion in ETF trading volume.
Year-to-date, the SPDRs also represent approximately 50% of ETF trading volume
($8.8 trillion), with Barclays Global Investors' iShares family a
distant-second at $3.75 trillion. 
</p>
<p>
But in a month of massive market turmoil, the news was not
all good for ETFs. The iShares lost ground versus the SPDRs in terms of overall
industry market share, and recent industry darling ProShares, which has
received mounds of press for its rapid rise to above $20 billion in assets, saw
major outflows in September, outflows at a level far surpassing any other ETF
provider.
</p>
<p>
SPDR portfolios, such as its S&#38;P 500 ETF (AMEX: SPY), saw
much of the short-term market trading action, and its gold portfolio (NYSE:
GLD), has been amassing considerable assets as the equities markets freefall.
However, SSgA has not only led the race in terms of trading volumes, but has
also gained considerable ground on Barclays Global Investors in terms of
overall assets year-to-date. The SSgA ETF family had close to $169.6 billion in
assets at the end of September, up from $144 billion in August, whereas BGI
fell from $295 billion in August to $280 billion. 
</p>
<p>
On a year-over-year basis, there has been an approximate $30
billion asset flip-flop between the two top ETF providers. In September 2007,
BGI had $312 billion and SSGA $133 billion. And in terms of year-to-date cash
flow, SSGA has net cash flow of $38.5 billion, while BGI stands at $22.7
billion. In terms of the worst asset story in September, ProShares was far and
away the ETF industry loser in this respect, down $2.4 billion in cash flow. No
ETF provider even came close to that level of net outflows for the month. The
second-largest outflows were experienced by WisdomTree, which had net outflows
of $119 million.
</p>
<p>
SPDRs has been buoyed by trading on the SPY, which in
September had close to $20 billion in net cash flow. That is twice its
year-to-date net cash flows of near $10 billion. Investors piling into gold
also helped the SPDRs: GLD had net inflows of close to $3 billion in September.
</p>
<p>
Barclays suffered mostly in its broad international ETF
portfolio. In fact, among the top ten largest ETF portfolios, only the iShares
MSCI EAFE (NYSE: EFA) had net outflows in September, dropping $285 million. For
the year-to-date period, the EFA has hemorrhaged more than $4 billion in
assets. What's more, year-to-date among the top-ten largest ETFs, EFA is the
only fund with net outflows of more than $1 billion, and the second-worst asset
story is a distant-second. Unfortunately for iShares, it's also one of its own:
the iShares Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund (NYSEArca: IWF) has had year-to-date
outflows of $773 million. 
</p>
<p>
Overall, only three of the top-ten ETFs have had net
outflows year-to-date, and all three are iShares, the third being the iShares
MSCI Emerging Markets (NYSEArca: EEM), which lost $129 million for the year. While
BGI still has six of the top 10 industry ETFs in terms of assets, only two of
those ETFs have larger asset bases than they did one year ago-the iShares
Lehman Aggregate Bond Fund (NYSEArca: AGG) and the iShares Russell 2000 Index
Fund (NYSEArca: IWM). And its largest ETFs are off considerably from a year
ago: EFA is down from $48 billion in September 2007 to $32 billion as of the
end of September.   A silver lining for EEM is that, while it is
still down year-to-date, it was actually fourth in net inflows in September
among the largest ETFs, with a little more than $3 billion gained.
</p>

<p>
Notable, but not surprising among the September data is the
poor performance of exchange-traded notes, the sister-product to ETFs, which
have been hard hit by their unsecured debt structure amidst the worsening
credit crisis. While there has been debate as to whether the unsecured-debt
nature of these investments would cause a direct hit on their marketing, the
answer from the September data seems to be a ‘yes.' The ETN industry had net
outflows of $443 million in September, with Barclays' iPath family, in
particular, accounting for almost all of that unwanted movement, down $474
million in net inflows for the month. Only three among the 12 ETN providers had
net inflows in September, and at levels that would were nothing to get overly
excited about: PowerShares' ETNs (co-branded with Deutsche Bank) had $68
million in ETN inflows; UBS' family has $1 million; and HSBC's ETNs saw $6
million in inflows. All of the other providers were either flat or negative,
and with nine of the 12 ETN providers having $100 million or less in total
assets, and marketing efforts hamstrung during the credit crisis, the situation
does not look promising in the short-term for these investments.
</p>
<p>
Among the major exchange-traded product categories, the only
dollar loser in September was currency, which had net outflows of $239
million.  It was a minor recovery for
currency ETFs and ETNs, which in August, had larger outflows of $513 million.
The two worst category performers from August found better fortunes in September.
Commodity portfolios, which had outflows of $542 million in August, had net
cash flow of $3.6 billion in September, but that was primarily buoyed by
investors migrating to GLD. The global/international category, which had close
to $2 billion in negative net cash flow in August, had positive cash flow of
$3.88 billion in September, the second-most among categories, but still far
behind domestic equity net cash flow of $47 billion for the month.
</p>
<strong>Month End September 2008<br />
</strong>Data Compiled by National Stock Exchange. Click <a href="http://www.nsx.com/content/etf-product-list">here</a> to view product list of ETFs/ETNs.<br />
<br />
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="550" class="greyBorders">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td> </td>
			<td colspan="2" align="center"><strong>Assets ($Mil)</strong></td>
			<td colspan="2" align="center"><strong>Net Cash Flow ($Mil)</strong></td>
			<td colspan="2" align="center"><strong>Notional Trading Vol ($Mil)</strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td><strong>By Issuer</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>Sep-07</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>Sep-08</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>YTD '08</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>Sep-08</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>YTD '08</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>Sep-08</strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="10"> </td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>BGI/iShares</td>
			<td align="right">$312,353</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$280,275 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$22,739</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$16,314 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$3,751,620</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$558,116 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>SSgA</td>
			<td align="right">$133,376</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$169,601 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$38,454</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$37,066 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$8,805,931</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$1,397,788 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Bank of NY</td>
			<td align="right">$10,432</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$8,240 </strong></td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000">($447)</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$158 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$179,900</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$30,626 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Vanguard</td>
			<td align="right">$37,298</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$46,757 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$15,901</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$1,149 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$135,661</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$21,769 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Invesco/PowerShares</td>
			<td align="right">$36,967</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$35,447 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$4,631</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2,111 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$1,529,059</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$228,741 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Rydex</td>
			<td align="right">$5,737</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$5,211 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$315</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$10 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$49,803</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$8,807 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Fidelity</td>
			<td align="right">$127</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$58 </strong></td>
			<td align="right"><span style="#ff0000">($37)</span></td>
			<td align="right"><strong>($26)</strong></td>
			<td align="right">$6,918</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$702 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Northern Trust</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$41 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$56</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$54</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$7 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>First Trust</td>
			<td align="right">$949</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$1,025 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$320</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$15 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$2,403</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$291 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Ameristock/Victoria Bay</td>
			<td align="right">$925</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2,903 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$2,196</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$1,015 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$214,328</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$34,027 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Van Eck</td>
			<td align="right">$1,520</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$4,753 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$3,505</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$485 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$61,662</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$9,197 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Wisdom Tree</td>
			<td align="right">$4,446</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$4,075 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$878</td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000"><strong>($119)</strong></td>
			<td align="right">$11,987</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$1,216 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>ProFunds</td>
			<td align="right">$8,028</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$20,175 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$11,016</td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000"><strong>($2,415)</strong></td>
			<td align="right">$2,119,221</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$420,931 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Claymore</td>
			<td align="right">$1,376</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$1,470 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$269</td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000"><strong>($89)</strong></td>
			<td align="right">$7,249</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$871 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>X-Shares</td>
			<td align="right">$149</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$187 </strong></td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000">($10)</td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000"><strong>($33)</strong></td>
			<td align="right">$518</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$56 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>FocusShares</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$17 </strong></td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000">($5)</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$0 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$98</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$13 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Merrill <span style="#ff0000">(HOLDRs)</span></td>
			<td align="right">$8,859</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$7,466 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$1,577</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2,032 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$587,620</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$81,589 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Bear Stearns</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$49 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$0 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$4</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$1 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Ziegler</td>
			<td align="right">$4</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$7 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$0 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$18</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>MacroShares</td>
			<td align="right">$42</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$22 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$430</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>($22)</strong></td>
			<td align="right">$1,217</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$25 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>SPA</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$23 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$15</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$67</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$11 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Greenhaven</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$21 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$24</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>($1)</strong></td>
			<td align="right">$141</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$11 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>RevenueShares</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$37 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$42</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$9 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$126</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$16 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td><u>ALPS</u></td>
			<td align="right"><u>$0</u></td>
			<td align="right"><strong><u>$4</u> </strong></td>
			<td align="right"><u>$5</u></td>
			<td align="right"><strong><u>$0</u> </strong></td>
			<td align="right"><u>$10</u></td>
			<td align="right"><strong><u>$2</u> </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>ETF Total</td>
			<td align="right">$562,590</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$587,864 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$101,873</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$57,662 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$17,465,614</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2,794,815 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td> </td>
			<td align="right"> </td>
			<td align="right"> </td>
			<td align="right"> </td>
			<td align="right"> </td>
			<td align="right"> </td>
			<td align="right"> </td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Barclays/iPath ETNs</td>
			<td align="right">$3,197</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$4,150 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$656</td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000"><strong>($474)</strong></td>
			<td align="right">$24,602</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$3,225 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Swedish Export Credit ETNs</td>
			<td align="right">$262</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$356 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$315</td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000"><strong>($17)</strong></td>
			<td align="right">$1,654</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$123 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Deutsche Bank/PowerShares ETNs</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$659 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$614</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$68 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$7,880</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2,779 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Lehman ETNs</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$13 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$16</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$0 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$30</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$1 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Bear Stearns ETNs</td>
			<td align="right">$65</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$65 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$20</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$0 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$255</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$9 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Morgan Stanley/Van Eck ETNs</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$108 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$101</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>($26)</strong></td>
			<td align="right">$462</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$188 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Credit Suisse ETNs</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$12 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$15</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$0 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$11</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>UBS ETNs</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$51 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$60</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$1 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$103</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$14 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Goldman Sachs ETNs</td>
			<td align="right">$73</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$13 </strong></td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000">($204)</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$0 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$245</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$21 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>JP Morgan ETNs</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$3 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$6</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$0 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$6</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$1 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>HSBC ETNs</td>
			<td align="right">$0</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$12 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$12</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$6 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$15</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$8 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td><u>Claymore ETNs</u></td>
			<td align="right"><u>$0</u></td>
			<td align="right"><strong><u>$3</u></strong></td>
			<td align="right"><u>$0</u></td>
			<td align="right"><strong><u>$0</u></strong></td>
			<td align="right"><u>$4</u></td>
			<td align="right"><strong><u>$0</u></strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>ETN Total</td>
			<td align="right">$3,596</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$5,446 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$1,611</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>($443)</strong></td>
			<td align="right">$35,267</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$6,371 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td> </td>
			<td align="right"> </td>
			<td align="right"> </td>
			<td align="right"> </td>
			<td align="right"> </td>
			<td align="right"> </td>
			<td align="right"> </td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Total ETF/ETN</td>
			<td align="right">$566,187</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$593,309 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$103,484</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$57,219 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$17,500,881</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2,801,187 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="10"> </td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<br />
<br />
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="550" class="greyBorders">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td> </td>
			<td colspan="2" align="center"><strong>Assets ($Mil)</strong></td>
			<td colspan="2" align="center"><strong>Net Cash Flow ($Mil)</strong></td>
			<td colspan="2" align="center"><strong>Notional Trading Vol ($Mil)</strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td><strong>By Category</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>Sep-07</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>Sep-08</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>YTD '08</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>Sep-08</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>YTD '08</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>Sep-08</strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="10"> </td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Domestic Equity</td>
			<td align="right">$344,801</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$370,561 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$71,575</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$47,269 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$15,180,448</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2,462,384 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Global/International Equity</td>
			<td align="right">$166,136</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$129,538 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$3,108</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$3,881 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$1,606,625</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$218,869 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Fixed Income</td>
			<td align="right">$29,145</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$50,368 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$17,104</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2,691 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$130,803</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$21,981 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Commodity</td>
			<td align="right">$22,862</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$37,854 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$10,259</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$3,617 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$536,600</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$88,920 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td><u>Currency</u></td>
			<td align="right"><u>$3,242</u></td>
			<td align="right"><strong><u>$4,988</u></strong></td>
			<td align="right"><u>$1,438</u></td>
			<td align="right"><strong><u>($239)</u></strong></td>
			<td align="right"><u>$46,405</u></td>
			<td align="right"><strong><u>$9,032</u></strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Total</td>
			<td align="right">$566,187</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$593,309 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$103,484</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$57,219 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$17,500,881</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2,801,187 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="10"> </td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<br />
<br />
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="550" class="greyBorders">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td> </td>
			<td colspan="2" align="center"><strong>Assets ($Mil)</strong></td>
			<td colspan="2" align="center"><strong>Net Cash Flow ($Mil)</strong></td>
			<td colspan="2" align="center"><strong>Notional Trading Vol ($Mil)</strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td><strong>Top 10 ETFs/ETNs by Size</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>Sep-07</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>Sep-08</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>YTD '08</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>Sep-08</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>YTD '08</strong></td>
			<td align="center"><strong>Sep-08</strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="10"> </td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>SPDR Index 500</td>
			<td align="right">$81,109</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$90,131 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$9,662</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$19,427 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$6,427,849</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$993,664 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>iShares MSCI-EAFE</td>
			<td align="right">$48,874</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$32,817 </strong></td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000">($4,108)</td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000"><strong>($285)</strong></td>
			<td align="right">$180,216</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$27,193 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>SPDR Equity Gold</td>
			<td align="right">$13,803</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$21,362 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$3,646</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2,868 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$231,217</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$43,083 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>iShares MSCI-Emerging Mkts</td>
			<td align="right">$22,497</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$19,962 </strong></td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000">($129)</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$3,077 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$489,495</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$71,445 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PowerShares QQQ</td>
			<td align="right">$19,959</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$18,089 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$1,886</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$2,360 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$1,464,489</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$221,332 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>iShares S&#38;P 500</td>
			<td align="right">$17,901</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$16,761 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$2,485</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$767 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$94,648</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$15,109 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>iShares Russell 2000</td>
			<td align="right">$12,719</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$16,672 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$7,536</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$6,375 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$1,331,429</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$216,669 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>SPDR Financial</td>
			<td align="right">$3,532</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$12,656 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$9,959</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$6,092 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$734,594</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$133,019 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>iShares Russell 1000 Gr</td>
			<td align="right">$13,131</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$11,703 </strong></td>
			<td align="right" style="#ff0000">($773)</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$146 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$37,464</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$3,975 </strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>iShares Lehman Agg</td>
			<td align="right">$7,069</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$9,509 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$1,975</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$79 </strong></td>
			<td align="right">$10,763</td>
			<td align="right"><strong>$1,723 </strong></td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<br />
<br />
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="550" class="greyBorders">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td> </td>
			<td style="right"><strong>Sep-07</strong></td>
			<td style="right"><strong>Sep-08</strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="10"> </td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td><strong>Number of Listed ETFs</strong></td>
			<td align="right"><strong>582</strong></td>
			<td align="right"><strong>720</strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td><strong><u>Number of Listed ETNs</u></strong></td>
			<td align="right"><strong><u>11</u></strong></td>
			<td align="right"><strong><u>93</u></strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td><strong> Total Listed ETFs/ETNs</strong></td>
			<td align="right"><strong>593</strong></td>
			<td align="right"><strong>813</strong></td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<em>Source: Data provided by the National Stock Exchange</em><br />
<br />
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="550">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>&#160;</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/etfs-grab-more-market-share-reach-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate: Mark-to-Market Accounting &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/debate-mark-to-market-accounting-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/debate-mark-to-market-accounting-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Northrop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black paint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFA Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirk van Dijk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Rothmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Napodano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Diermeier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lone Star Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark-to-market accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities And Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/15011/Debate%3A+Mark-to-Market+Accounting+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We haveÂ once again eavesdropped on what our Zacks Equity Research senior analysts have been discussing with one another lately.Â  The most recent topic?Â  TheÂ proposed suspension ofÂ "mark-to-market" accounting (that is, the assigning of value based on an item's current market price):</p>
<p><em>Dirk van Dijk, CFA, Director of Zacks Equity Research</em>: I'm not sure how many accounting principals are more fundamental than "lower of cost or market."Â  There are some transactions being done between willing buyers and sellers.Â  That is the best way of finding out what the "true" value of something is.Â  Suspending mark-to-market is just an attempt to hide the real condition of the banks -- it allows them to pretend that the garbage on their books is really gold.Â  </p>
<p>Isn't misrepresenting the values on your books the very core of the idea of securities fraud?Â  That is all that doing away with mark to market would be, legalizing and legitimatizing securities fraud.</p>
<p><em>Jason Napodano, CFA, senior drug industry analyst</em>: I'm not sure what transactions you're talking about, Dirk, but from what I've heard the market for these types of securities is completely illiquid.</p>
<p>It's impossible to mark-to-market when you have absolutely no idea what the market is.Â  There's got to be a better option than, "No one is buying it, so it must be worth zero" mentality.Â  Bernanke and Paulson both stated they would probably buy many of these securities at prices above what is being marked on banks' balance sheets right now.Â  If we can come up with a reasonable pricing mechanism for the value of stock options, then a similar formula should be able to be put into place to calculate the value of mortgage-backed securities.</p>
<p>Prices are artificially low due to a combination of fear and illiquidity. I suspect that if all these funds were held to maturity, they would return far greater value then their current mark-to-market price.</p>
<p><em>Sean P. Smith, senior travel &#38; leisure industry analyst</em>: There has been a market for these securities, just not one to which the banks have been willing to mark their assets.</p>
<p>At the end of July, <strong>Merrill</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mer">MER</a>) agreed to sell $30.6 billion gross notional amount of CDOs [collateralized debt obligations] to Lone Star Funds for $6.7 billion. That would equate to roughly $0.22 on the dollar. However, to complete the deal, Merrill had to provide financing to Lone Star for 75% of the purchase (approximately $5 billion). </p>
<p>The loan was non-recourse, meaning Lone Star could put the CDOs back to Merrill should the CDOs deteriorate, and Lone Star would only be out the $1.7 billion in equity it put up. In essence, Lone Star paid about $0.055 on the dollar.</p>
<p>I doubt things have improved in the last two months.</p>
<p><em>Ann Northrop, CFA, senior communications and restaurant industries analyst</em>: I thought Jeff Diermeier,Â  CEO of the CFA Institute, summed it up well in his September 23rd letter to legislators and regulators. He argued for mark-to-market accounting with optional disclosure of alternative valuation criteria, such as companies that report certain cash flow metrics or EBITDA do now.Â  </p>
<p>He went on to posit that it is capital adequacy and not reporting requirements that should be flexible in chaotic financial times. Here is an excerpt and the link to the letter follows:</p>
<p>"Complaints about fair value arise largely in the context of their impact on capital adequacy. Rather than suspending fair value and thereby the transparency and relevance of financial information, perhaps the focus should instead be on flexibility in capital adequacy requirements in times of distress. This is a much more direct and transparent means of dealing with the capital issues."</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cfainstitute.org/centre/topics/comment/2008/080923.html">http://www.cfainstitute.org/centre/topics/comment/2008/080923.html</a></p>
<p><em>Eric Rothmann, senior financials and insurance industries analyst</em>: The one place that we should never be "flexible" is capital adequacy.Â  If there was more emphasis on the quality and quantity of capital, the taxpayers would in all likelihood be on the hood for a lot less.</p>
<p><em>Ann Northrop</em>: Looks like the SEC has eased mark-to-market accounting. </p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081001/bs_nm/us_usa_accounting_sec">http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081001/bs_nm/us_usa_accounting_sec</a></p>
<p><em>Dirk van Dijk</em>: <em>"By clarifying how to treat assets in an uncertain market, the SEC is continuing to provide transparency to investors and helping institutions to provide credit in periods of market stress."</em></p>
<p>Yeah, the best way to provide transparency is to paint over the windows with black paint and then hang heavy curtains in front of them.</p>
<p><em>Ann Northrop</em>: Looks like they're paving the road to the next disaster.Â  In the meantime, I would imagine this will greatly reduce the multiple investors are willing to pay for bank stocks. How can anyone know what they are really buying? (Thanks, Ann, for passing this along to all of us.)</p>
<p></p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=MER">"MER" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/debate-mark-to-market-accounting-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post: Is America Ready For Truth And Reconciliation?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-india-stocks/guest-post-is-america-ready-for-truth-and-reconciliation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-india-stocks/guest-post-is-america-ready-for-truth-and-reconciliation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anantha Nageswaran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Sagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflationary solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Pettis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Leeson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul kedrosky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities And Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Randy Waldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Randy Waldmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/2008/09/26/guest-post-is-america-ready-for-truth-and-reconciliation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By V Anantha Nageswaran
On September 19th, the U.S. Treasury Secretary Paulson issued a statement in which he said that the Federal government “must implement a program to remove these illiquid assets that are weighing down our financial institutions and threatening our economy”. He called it the ‘Troubled Asset Relief Program’. Many have taken to abbreviating [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-india-stocks/guest-post-is-america-ready-for-truth-and-reconciliation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 Real Assets Set to Profit from the Death of the Dollar</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/4-real-assets-set-to-profit-from-the-death-of-the-dollar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/4-real-assets-set-to-profit-from-the-death-of-the-dollar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fnm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Granholm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Litle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mining Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil reserves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities And Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taipan Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taipan Publishing Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.straightstocks.com/?p=19203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The headlines are dramatic. Short selling banned for 799 financial institutions. $50bn injected into money markets. Plans for a massive bailout fund to clear the system of bad debt and stabilize the housing market.
The Unholy trinity &#8211; the Federal Reserve, SEC and Treasury &#8211; has pulled out all the stops this time. But while US [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/4-real-assets-set-to-profit-from-the-death-of-the-dollar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Attempt at Clear Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/an-attempt-at-clear-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/an-attempt-at-clear-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael E. Brisky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Schwab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constellation Energy Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FULL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael brisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-819581243324579563.post-7290965618700966905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, so the market is pretty much chaos right now.  There isn't anyone who won't argue that.  Will Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley survive?  I don't know.  But does it matter at this point?  We're about out of investment banks now.  Truth be told, some clear thinking would help everyone right now.  Who isn't frustrated?  But its times like these, believe it or not, when the money is MADE.  In case anyone didn't notice Warren Buffett picked up Constellation Energy Group for $26.50 per share.  It traded at nearly $70 last week.  Nice job, Warren.<br /><br />In the aftermath of this crisis, you're going to have many people who will be very apprehensive with their brokers.  A lot of people.  These people are going to look at who got them into things like mortgage-back securities for investments, among other things.  Who pushed them?  The big brokerages and investment banks.  (Lehman, Bear, Merrill, Morgan, Goldman).  Yeah, those guys.  So okay, Ken Lewis, you got a great company in Merrill Lynch this week.  But their perception in the investment world will be changed.  For Good.  They are going to have a tougher time convincing investors to place money in their hands.  <br /><br />What am I getting at?  Medium-level or somewhat discount brokerages are probably going to see a major rise in business.  I'm talking about Charles Schwab, Fidelity, TD Ameritrade, and Etrade.  I'm going to focus on Schwab(<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SCHW">SCHW</a>) a little.  They have a well known, successful business model.  Cheaper commissions than the big guys, but more service and features than the little guys.  A good place to be if you asked me.  They've been making a major push into the banking business, and it has worked.  They offer high-interest checking with no ATM fees anywhere in the US.  Its a pretty good program.  Shares have sold off a bit this week (what hasn't?) to around $22.  I like the stock here, and would love it if we see it lower due to overall market weakness.   <br /><br />So, there's my attempt at clear thinking for the day.  Let's keep our eyes open like Buffett.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/an-attempt-at-clear-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 Trades to Watch Today</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/3-trades-to-watch-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/3-trades-to-watch-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Drake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Fuld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Greenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea Asset Management Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Chol Hwi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.straightstocks.com/?p=18472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Too often traders not only have an opinion, but become inflexible.  Direction is never a definite, but rather a probability. It&#8217;s easy after a good day to convince yourself you &#8220;know something&#8221;. Don&#8217;t get off track, and instead remind yourself that all you know is you&#8217;ll act according to your system, no matter what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/3-trades-to-watch-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things Are About to Go From Bad to Worse</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/things-are-about-to-go-from-bad-to-worse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/things-are-about-to-go-from-bad-to-worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham Summers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America—it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global stock monitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graham summers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance victim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail counterparts—are moving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities And Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wachovia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:globalstockmonitor.com://a4a5b4aaa15b0f8a903554f6c4e94820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sep 16th, 2008: Now is the time for extreme caution. Things are only going to get worse]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/things-are-about-to-go-from-bad-to-worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buyout of Merrill and Bankruptcy of Lehman Heightens Worry  of U.S. Credit Crisis Pain Still to Come</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/buyout-of-merrill-and-bankruptcy-of-lehman-heightens-worry-of-us-credit-crisis-pain-still-to-come/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/buyout-of-merrill-and-bankruptcy-of-lehman-heightens-worry-of-us-credit-crisis-pain-still-to-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon lll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adorno & Yoss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American International Group Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aozora Bank Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Axiom Management Partners LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bain Capital LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America Bulks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of america corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Institute Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays Plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben S. Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernstein Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad  Hintz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles  "Chuck" Tatelbaum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Board Of Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clayton Dubilier & Rice Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convulsions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countrywide Financial Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cumberland Advisors Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Havens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kotok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Dinallo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evercore Partners Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fed-funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Open Market Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France's BNP Paribas SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frankfurt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTSE 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTSEurofirst 300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hellman & Friedman LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry M. "Hank"  Paulson Jr
.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBEX 35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Giant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance giants capital woes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance-and-asset-management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John A. Thain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPMorgan Chase & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth D Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KKR Financial Holdings LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knight Capital Group Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ladenberg Thalmann & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lehman bros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Term Capital Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lutz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media  outlets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meredith Whitney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Lender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq Composite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuberger Berman Management Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nixon  administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oppenheimer & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Mortimer Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter G. Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kenny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Primary Dealer Credit Facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Bove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard S. Fuld Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert B. Willumstad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Altman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturnino S. Fanlo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stan Jonas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard & Poor's Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard and Poor's Ratings Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bear Stearns Cos.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Blackstone Group LP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tri-party repo  systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troubled mortgage lender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Bankruptcy  Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Interbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Treasury Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubs Ag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vineland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Mutual Inc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/09/16/us-credit-crisis./</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By William Patalon III
    And Jennifer Yousfi
    Money Morning Editors
After a weekend in which the deepening U.S credit crisis  sent one top investment bank to bankruptcy court and a second into...

Money Morning is here to help investors profit han...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/buyout-of-merrill-and-bankruptcy-of-lehman-heightens-worry-of-us-credit-crisis-pain-still-to-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Meltdown?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/monday-meltdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/monday-meltdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Brodrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia Will Open Uranium Mining 
Toro
Energy Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy & Minerals Australia Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Open
Market Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gulf of mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Ike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ike Spares Texas Refineries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals Win State Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olivier Jakob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization Of Petroleum Exporting Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petromatrix Gmbh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western
Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Australian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zug]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.moneyandmarkets.com/blog/red-hot-energy-and-gold/0/0/monday-meltdown-</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dow futures are way, way down this
morning as the US financial sector careens toward a ditch. On the other
hand, gold started the morning up $14, but it's only up $5 as I write
this as the US dollar rallies. We'll sit the morning out -- I may have
trading recommendations for my services later.<br /><img alt="" style="490px;" src="http://local.content.compendiumblog.com/uploads/user/7e88b461-578b-47f3-88ec-038e212ad053/aa0ff38d-9bb9-44a5-bba5-8be30d8f6977/oil%20in%20euros.jpg"/><br /><p style="italic;" class="MsoNormal">Source: Chart of the Day/Bloomberg</p> <p class="MsoNormal"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal">“Despite
all the rhetoric, with the rally in the dollar index, OPEC is still
saying `thank you very much,''' Olivier Jakob, managing director of
Petromatrix Gmbh in Zug, Switzerland, said. “For OPEC, $80 now is the same as $100 two months ago.''</p> <p class="MsoNormal"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&#38;sid=abVpg8xJDMWk&#38;refer=news">Loss of Merrill, Lehman Signals `Tectonic' Shift in Wall Street Landscape </a>In
the biggest reshaping of the financial industry since the Great
Depression, two of Wall Street's most storied firms, Merrill Lynch
&#38; Co. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., headed toward extinction.</p> <p class="MsoNormal"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/usDollarRpt/idUSLF72022420080915">Chance of Rate Cut at Fed Meeting Now Set at 88%</a></p> <p class="MsoNormal">Fed
funds futures contracts attached an 88 percent chance the Fed will
lower rates by 25 basis points at or before Tuesday's Federal Open
Market Committee meeting.</p> <p class="MsoNormal"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal">URANIUM</p> <p class="MsoNormal"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601080&#38;sid=aebF.C3CEA6k&#38;refer=news">Western Australia Set for Uranium Mines as Liberals Win State Government </a>Western
Australia's uranium-related companies are set for a boost after the
Liberal Party, which favors ending a ban on mining the nuclear fuel,
yesterday won the backing of the Nationals to form government.</p> <p class="MsoNormal"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601081&#38;sid=a_0f50xiJdG0&#38;refer=australia">Toro, Energy Rise on Optimism Western Australia Will Open Uranium Mining </a>Toro
Energy Ltd. and Energy &#38; Minerals Australia Ltd. led gains in
shares of Western Australian uranium explorers as the Liberal Party,
which has indicated it will allow mining of the fuel in the state, won
the right to govern.</p> <p class="MsoNormal"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal">CRUDE OIL</p> <p class="MsoNormal"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&#38;sid=aTPdzmIgzZ4U&#38;refer=canada">Crude Oil Falls Below $97 as Ike Spares Texas Refineries, Lehman Collapses </a>Crude oil fell below $97 a barrel to the lowest in seven months as refineries along the Gulf of Mexico coast escaped major damage from Hurricane Ike and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. filed for bankruptcy.</p> <p class="MsoNormal"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&#38;sid=acGRmDEgkF2M&#38;refer=latin_america">Emerging-Market `Panic' Masks Record Profits, May End With 20% Stock Rally </a>Emerging-market
companies, earning more for shareholders than ever before, are getting
no respect just as their stocks drop to levels that preceded rallies.</p> <p class="MsoNormal"> </p> <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601072&#38;sid=ak7Ex365VGE8&#38;refer=energy">Lehman is Suspended From ICE Energy, LME Metals Trading After Bankruptcy </a>Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., the fourth-largest U.S. investment bank, was suspended from energy and metals trading in London after Europe's biggest clearing house declared the company a defaulter.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/monday-meltdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LEH Shoe Drops; BofA Leaps at Merrill &#8211; Zacks Tale of the Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/leh-shoe-drops-bofa-leaps-at-merrill-zacks-tale-of-the-tape-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/leh-shoe-drops-bofa-leaps-at-merrill-zacks-tale-of-the-tape-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/14706/LEH+Shoe+Drops%3B+BofA+Leaps+at+Merrill+-+Zacks+Tale+of+the+Tape</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, they say it's better to know than to not know, even if the news is not good.  <strong>Lehman Brothers</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/leh">LEH</a>), the 158-year-old investment bank (according to an AP report this morning), has officially filed for bankrupcy.  It seemed for a time that a rabbit may have been pulled from a Korean hat to save the New York banking stalwart, but no such luck.</p>
<p>It wouldn't be overstating it to say that this is a true American disaster.  That it comes at the peak of hurricane season elsewhere in the U.S., one can easily bring to mind the image of a slow-motion Category 5 still wreaking havoc on Wall Street.  From the beginning of the year with <strong>Bank of America</strong>, or <strong>BofA</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/bac">BAC</a>) buying out Countrywide through the collapse of Bear Stears into <strong>JP Morgan's</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/jpm">JPM</a>) arms, 2008 will mark a negative touchstone in the history of U.S. finance.  </p>
<p>Speaking of BofA, the now-colossal Charlotte-based bank has just purchased another American icon in the investment world: <strong>Merrill Lynch &#38; Co. </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mer">MER</a>), for a reported $50 billion, or $29 per share.  But in light of BofA paying far too much for Countrywide -- in retrospect, and hindsight is always 20/20 -- investors may be concerned BofA overpaid for Merrill, which had been experiencing hardships of its own lately.  This may explain BAC shares falling 12% in early Monday trading, while MER is up close to 30%.</p>
<p></p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=LEH">"LEH" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=BAC">"BAC" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=MER">"MER" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/leh-shoe-drops-bofa-leaps-at-merrill-zacks-tale-of-the-tape-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LEH Shoe Drops; BofA Leaps at Merrill &#8211; Zacks Tale of the Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/leh-shoe-drops-bofa-leaps-at-merrill-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/leh-shoe-drops-bofa-leaps-at-merrill-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/14706/LEH+Shoe+Drops%3B+BofA+Leaps+at+Merrill+-+Zacks+Tale+of+the+Tape</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, they say it's better to know than to not know, even if the news is not good.  <strong>Lehman Brothers</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/leh">LEH</a>), the 158-year-old investment bank (according to an AP report this morning), has officially filed for bankrupcy.  It seemed for a time that a rabbit may have been pulled from a Korean hat to save the New York banking stalwart, but no such luck.</p>
<p>It wouldn't be overstating it to say that this is a true American disaster.  That it comes at the peak of hurricane season elsewhere in the U.S., one can easily bring to mind the image of a slow-motion Category 5 still wreaking havoc on Wall Street.  From the beginning of the year with <strong>Bank of America</strong>, or <strong>BofA</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/bac">BAC</a>) buying out Countrywide through the collapse of Bear Stears into <strong>JP Morgan's</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/jpm">JPM</a>) arms, 2008 will mark a negative touchstone in the history of U.S. finance.  </p>
<p>Speaking of BofA, the now-colossal Charlotte-based bank has just purchased another American icon in the investment world: <strong>Merrill Lynch &#38; Co. </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mer">MER</a>), for a reported $50 billion, or $29 per share.  But in light of BofA paying far too much for Countrywide -- in retrospect, and hindsight is always 20/20 -- investors may be concerned BofA overpaid for Merrill, which had been experiencing hardships of its own lately.  This may explain BAC shares falling 12% in early Monday trading, while MER is up close to 30%.</p>
<p></p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=LEH">"LEH" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=BAC">"BAC" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=MER">"MER" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/leh-shoe-drops-bofa-leaps-at-merrill-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNBC Fast Money Trades for 9/4</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/cnbc-fast-money-trades-for-94/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/cnbc-fast-money-trades-for-94/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CEO Blogger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carter Worth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Schwab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontier Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Adami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home-Depot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Macke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Najarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Finerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mcdonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Najarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Potash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raymond James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceoblogger.wordpress.com/?p=1278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNBC Fast Money trades for 9/3 show:
Track these picks at:
http://trackthepros.com/
Jeff Macke:
POT - Potash - Buy at $150 with a stop at $145
Guy Adami:
POT - Potash - Buy
HD - Home Depot - Sell
GLW - Corning - Buy
USB - USB - Buy on a pullback
XOM - Exxon - Buy then sell as it approaches $82
Pete Najarian:
FTO - [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/cnbc-fast-money-trades-for-94/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News for 26 August 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/news-for-26-august-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/news-for-26-august-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Agustin Gonzalez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chen Shui-bian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Liang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kolter Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Och]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taipei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.agustingonzalez.com/my_weblog/2008/08/news-for-26-aug.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citigroup limits meetings, pares color photocopies [Bloomberg] Citigroup has banned off-site meetings among employees and cut back on color photocopying to reduce expenses Top China economist quits Goldman Sachs [Reuters] Goldman Sachs senior China economist, Hong Liang, has resigned amid...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/news-for-26-august-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merrill to open wealth units in Moscow, Istanbul</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-russia-stocks/merrill-to-open-wealth-units-in-moscow-istanbul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-russia-stocks/merrill-to-open-wealth-units-in-moscow-istanbul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Corcoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Suisse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[former Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Istanbul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Istanbul Wealth Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JASON CORCORAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean-Marie Deluermoz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onshore banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail banking license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth management services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7619541933410184333.post-2700095316717260043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Wealth Bulletin</strong><br /><br />24 June 2008 - By Jason Corcoran<br /><br />Merrill Lynch wealth management unit is expanding its business by opening new offices in Russia and Turkey and expanding teams in Greece and other regions of emerging Europe.<br /><br />Jean-Marie Deluermoz, director of emerging European markets, EMEA Wealth Management, at Merrill Lynch, said the group had given him a substantial budget to expand the business over the next five years.<br /><br />Speaking in Moscow at the launch of the Capgemini Merrill Lynch 2008 Wealth Report, he told Wealth Bulletin: "We have a big recruitment budget for the region. Emerging Europe - Russia, the former Soviet Union states, Turkey and Greece - are attracting strong growth rates for wealth management."<br /><br />A Moscow office to serve Russian clients offshore is expected to open in the third quarter, as is a new office in Istanbul. Merrill is also recruiting new teams for Greece and other countries, which were not disclosed.<br /><br />Deluermoz, who set up Credit Suisse's representative office in Moscow in 2003, will take charge of the Russian operation from London.<br /><br />He said Russian high net worth clients were starting to look beyond cash deposits and real estate investment to more sophisticated products such as hedge funds.<br /><br />Deluermoz said the bank had decided not to go down the route of offering onshore banking in Moscow like its rivals UBS and Credit Suisse.<br /><br />"It takes one year to get authorisation from the market regulator and another two years for a retail banking license, which you need to offer wealth management services," he added.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-russia-stocks/merrill-to-open-wealth-units-in-moscow-istanbul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Further DOW and S&amp;P Slide</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/further-dow-and-sp-slide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/further-dow-and-sp-slide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kingsland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Market News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelo Mozilo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delphi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P 1400]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldcom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/further-dow-and-sp-slide/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was another ugly day yesterday. While a test of S&#38;P 1400 looms, something blogged about over the weekend, and may come as early as tomorrow morning; an oversold bounce is not out of the question, BUT that will largely depend upon the news of the coming days and how open interest looks on indexes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/further-dow-and-sp-slide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Bear Stearns a Buy?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/is-bear-stearns-a-buy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/is-bear-stearns-a-buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/is-bear-stearns-a-buy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever a good company falls upon hard times that could very well just be temporary, it pays for value investors to take a look and see if Wall Street has overly punished the stock. After the hedge fund blowups at Bear Stearns (BSC) recently (they made some bad bets in the mortgage market), BSC stock [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/is-bear-stearns-a-buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
