<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stock Market News &#38; Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks &#187; Medicare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.straightstocks.com/tag/medicare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.straightstocks.com</link>
	<description>Leading Stock Market News, Opinions and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Debt dynamics will hold back economy</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/debt-dynamics-will-hold-back-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/debt-dynamics-will-hold-back-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prieur du Plessis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Minter;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comstock Partners;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment postcards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regarded investment manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/?p=13581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is a guest contribution by Comstock Partners, the highly regarded investment manager run by Charles Minter, arguing that government debt could double while private debt could be cut in half.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/debt-dynamics-will-hold-back-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthspring Inc. &#8211; Value &#8211; Zacks Rank Buy</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthspring-inc-value-zacks-rank-buy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthspring-inc-value-zacks-rank-buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Ryniec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare Advantage;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDP;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Consensus Estimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/12736/Healthspring+Inc.+-+Value+-+Zacks+Rank+Buy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Healthspring, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/HS">HS</a>) has surprised on estimates 3 out of the last 4 quarters by an average of 6.45%. The stock is cheap. It trades at just 6.7x forward earnings and has a PEG ratio of 0.67.<p ALIGN="left">

<b>Company Description</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

Healthspring coordinates care plans through the Medicare Advantage market in Alabama, Florida, Illinois, Mississippi, Tennessee and Texas. The company also provides a national stand-alone Medicare prescription drug plan.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Healthspring Surprised by 22.22% in the Third Quarter</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

On Oct 29, Healthspring reported its third quarter results and easily beat the Zacks Consensus by 14 cents per share. Earnings per share were 77 cents compared to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 63 cents. The company reported 53 cents in the year ago period.</p><p ALIGN="left">

Premium revenue rose 26% to $649.8 million compared to the year ago period. Membership in the Medicare Advantage jumped 19.4% compared to the year ago period and was up 15.1% even when compared with the end of 2008. Stand-alone PDP member also grew 11.6% compared to the third quarter of 2008.</p><p ALIGN="left">

As it said in its second quarter results, the company again emphasized that its Florida and Part-D operations have been outperforming.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Raised 2009 Guidance</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

Given that its Florida business continues to be strong, the company raised full year EPS guidance to the range of $2.30 to $2.40 from its prior guidance of $2.10 to $2.25. </p><p ALIGN="left">

It also is bullish on the number of members it expects under the Medicare Advantage program. The range has been adjusted higher to 188,000-189,000 from 186,000-188,000.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Zacks Consensus Estimates Rise</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

Given the raised guidance, analysts have moved to raise estimates. For the fourth quarter, the Zacks Consensus is up 3 cents to 62 cents in the last 30 days.</p><p ALIGN="left">

The full-year Zacks Consensus Estimate rose 7.8% to $2.34 from $2.17 per share just a month ago which is in the company's new guidance range. All 9 analysts raised in that time. Analysts expect 2009 earnings growth of 10.43%.</p><p ALIGN="left">

Analysts are optimistic about 2010, despite the ongoing uncertainty about healthcare reform. They boosted estimates for the full year by 16 cents to $2.22 per share.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Value Fundamentals</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

Healthspring is a Zacks #1 Rank (strong buy) stock. It is trading with a price-to-book of just 1.06. The company has a 5-year average return on equity (ROE) of 14.65%.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthspring-inc-value-zacks-rank-buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Net Beats Estimates &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/health-net-beats-estimates-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/health-net-beats-estimates-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1 virus;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health plan services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare PDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitedhealth Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Government Accounting Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/27048/Health+Net+Beats+Estimates+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Health Net</strong>&#8217;s (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/HNT">HNT</a>) third-quarter earnings per share came in at 67 cents, well above the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 61 cents and the year-ago earnings of 35 cents. The company reported revenues of $4 billion, an increase of 3.9% compared to the corresponding quarter of last year. The company receives revenues in the form of health plan service premiums, government contracts, net investment income and administrative services, fees and other income.</p>
<p>Health plan services premium, accounting for approximately 80% of total revenues during the quarter increased 3% year over year to $3.17 million. While revenues from government contracts increased 4.7% to $758 million, sequentially, it came down by 8.8%. We believe revenues from government contracts will decline further with the loss of contract in July with the Department of Defense awarding <strong>Aetna </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AET">AET</a>) the $2.8 billion managed care contract to provide services for the northern region of the department's TRICARE program, replacing Health Net. However, Health Net protested against this move to the US Government Accounting Office; a final decision is yet to be taken.</p>
<p>In July, Health Net entered into an agreement with <strong>UnitedHealth Group</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/UNH">UNH</a>) under which UnitedHealth acquired the northeast commercial operations of Health Net for about $510 million. We believe this decision was taken so that Health Net could concentrate on its core western markets.</p>
<p>At the end of the reported quarter, total health plan and total commercial risk enrollment were 3.6 million members, a decline of 3.8% and 166, 000 members, a decline of 8%, respectively compared with the year ago period. Apart from Medicaid enrollment, which increased 13.5% compared to the third quarter of 2008, enrollment in Medicare Advantage plan and Medicare PDP plans declined by 2.4% and 13.4%, respectively. The rise in Medicaid enrollment was the result of economic downturn, which causes the Medicaid-eligible population to increase.</p>
<p>Medical care ratio (MCR), calculating the amount paid in claims compared to premiums received for Health Net&#8217;s health plan services, declined to 86.4% during the quarter compared to 87.5% in the year ago period.</p>
<p>In addition to posting quarterly results, Health Net revised its outlook for 2009. The company now expects earnings per share at the lower end of its prior guidance, at $2.25 - $2.30 compared to the earlier guidance of $2.25 - $2.35. We believe higher costs related to the spread of H1N1 virus and expansion of COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985) membership by laid-off workers made the company lower its outlook. Under COBRA, people can continue their employer sponsored insurance coverage even after they lose their jobs.</p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=HNT">Read the full analyst report on "HNT"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UNH">Read the full analyst report on "UNH"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/health-net-beats-estimates-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Stanley Works, Black &amp; Decker Corporation, Joy Global, Paccar and Illinois Tool Works &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-stanley-works-black-decker-corporation-joy-global-paccar-and-illinois-tool-works-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-stanley-works-black-decker-corporation-joy-global-paccar-and-illinois-tool-works-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black & Decker Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Tool Works;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joy Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil import bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paccar;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software side]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tool Maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26843/Zacks+Analyst+Blog+Highlights%3A+Stanley+Works%2C+Black+%26+Decker+Corporation%2C+Joy+Global%2C+Paccar+and+Illinois+Tool+Works+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><strong>For Immediate Release</strong></p>
<p align="left">Chicago, IL &#8211; November 4, 2009 &#8211; Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: <strong>Stanley Works </strong>(<a href="void(0)">SWK</a>), <strong>Black &#38; Decker Corporation </strong>(<a href="void(0)">BDK</a>), <strong>Joy Global </strong>(<a href="void(0)">JOYG</a>), <strong>Paccar </strong>(<a href="void(0)">PCAR</a>) and <strong>Illinois Tool Works </strong>(<a href="void(0)">ITW</a>).</p>
<p align="left">Get the most recent insight from Zacks Equity Research with the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513</a></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Here are highlights from Tuesday&#8217;s AnalystBlog: </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Stanley Works Acquires B&#38;D</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Stanley Works </strong>(<a href="void(0)">SWK</a>) and <strong>Black &#38; Decker Corporation </strong>(<a href="void(0)">BDK</a>) have entered into a definitive merger agreement to create Stanley Black &#38; Decker, an $8.4 billion global tool maker. The Board of Directors of both companies approved an all-stock transaction valued at approximately $4.5 billion.</p>
<p align="left">Under the terms of the deal, Black &#38; Decker shareholders will receive 1.275 Stanley shares for each Black &#38; Decker share they own. The deal is expected to close in the first half of 2010. Upon the completion of the transaction, Stanley shareholders will own 50.5% of the combined company, while Black &#38; Decker shareholders will own the remaining 49.5%.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>The Shape of GDP</strong></p>
<p align="left">While Government spending is higher now as a share of total GDP than its long-term average, it is below what it averaged in the 1950&#8217;s and 1960&#8217;s, and is not way out of line. I would, however, note that the measure of government spending does not include transfer payments like Social Security, Medicare, or unemployment insurance. Those are considered part of Consumption.</p>
<p align="left">On the other hand, Investment is the most volatile of the components of GDP, and even if it were to return to the previous record low of 12.77% of GDP, that would be a 15.7% increase, assuming everything else showed no growth at all. A return to the long-term average would be a 44.5% increase.</p>
<p align="left">With commercial rents plunging and vacancy rates soaring, the value of commercial real estate is in free-fall. It thus seems unlikely that we will get any short-term recovery on investments in non-residential structures. Thus if we are going to get a rebound in non-residential fixed investment, it will most likely have to come from the equipment and software side. That would be a very powerful tonic for the likes of companies like <strong>Joy Global </strong>(<a href="void(0)">JOYG</a>), <strong>Paccar </strong>(<a href="void(0)">PCAR</a>) and <strong>Illinois Tool Works </strong>(<a href="void(0)">ITW</a>).</p>
<p align="left">However, will companies have a reason to invest in more equipment and software if the consumers are not buying? The key to that puzzle will most likely have to reside in the net exports area. At some point, we are going to have to get back to the point where were are running trade surpluses, where we export more than we import. Investments that reduce our oil import bill would also greatly help that effort.</p>
<p align="left">Want more from Zacks Equity Research? Subscribe to the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks Equity Research</strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.</p>
<p align="left">Continuous coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.</p>
<p align="left">Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517</a></p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks </strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.</p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/zacksresearch">http://twitter.com/zacksresearch</a></p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a></p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.</p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />
Mark Vickery<br />
Web Content Editor<br />
312-265-9380<br />
Visit: <a href="www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a></p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left"> </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-stanley-works-black-decker-corporation-joy-global-paccar-and-illinois-tool-works-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Shape of GDP &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/the-shape-of-gdp-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/the-shape-of-gdp-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Tool Works;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joy Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil import bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paccar;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software side]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26823/The+Shape+of+GDP+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
While last week GDP growth came in better than expected at 3.5%, which was a very welcome development, there was very little change in the coverall shape of GDP. This is a troubling development for the long term.<br />
<br />
GDP is the sum of spending by the Consumer, Private Investment, Government Spending and Net Exports. The Graph below shows the percentage each of them has contributed to overall GDP since 1947.<br />
<br />
The Consumer is still by far the dominate force in the economy, and it is becoming more so. In the 3Q, PCE, meaning the consumer, rose to 70.98% of GDP, up from 70.66% in the second quarter. That is an all-time record high. At the same time, private investment was virtually unchanged near an all-time low as a share of GDP at 11.04%, up from 11.03% in the 2Q.<br />
<br />
Government spending as a share of GDP actually declined slightly to 20.68% from 20.70%. Net Exports deteriorated to -2.71% from -2.40%.<br />
<br />
While the Consumer has always been the biggest share of GDP, it has not always been so dominant. Back in the 1960&#8217;s it averaged only 61.83% of the economy, or more than 9 full percentage points less as a share of the economy. The other three parts of GDP were all correspondingly higher, with the biggest differences being in Investment (4.45% percentage points) and net exports (3.33 percentage points). Government&#8217;s share of the economy was just 1.37% higher than it was in the 3Q.<br />
<br />
The decline in Investment&#8217;s share of GDP is extremely disturbing, and the drop in net exports is a little disconcerting. We have made significant progress over the last year in reducing the net export drag, and the backsliding is not welcome news. The decline in investment is even more disturbing when you consider that it was residential investment that was responsible for the slight uptick as it increased at a 23.4% annual rate (from a record low level of 2.44% to a still extremely low 2.52%). Non-Residential fixed investment dropped to 9.55% of GDP from 9.84%).<br />
<br />
Inventory investment is also included in the Investment numbers, which is why those two add to 12.07%, not to 11.04%, as inventory investment was negative in the 3Q, just not as negative as it was in the 2Q. Thus it actually contributed to GDP growth in the quarter. But housing is not exactly something in short supply in the U.S. right now. It is not the sort of investment that creates lots of cash flows for the repayment of debt, and it does not spur innovation; it is not the sort of investment that leads to further growth.<br />
<br />
As shown in the table below, Investment has averaged 15.53% of GDP in the post-war period. Prior to the current downturn, the lowest share of the economy it ever reached was 12.77%, in the second quarter of 1949. In fact, out of 250 quarters, only 30 have seen private investment slip below 14.0%, and six of those have been during the current downturn.<br />
<br />
While many bemoan the debt we are leaving to our children and grandchildren, we are really shortchanging them by our lack of investment in new productive capacity. While higher consumer spending makes the economy feel better in the short term, it cannot be the basis for long-term economic health.<br />
<br />
Our parents and grandparents deferred consuming things and put resources into the plants and equipment that made things -- and that powered future growth. Money was spent on research and development of new ideas that became new industries. We are not doing that at anywhere near the rate that we used to, or that other countries are doing today. This is a recipe for long-term economic decline.<br />
<br />
While Government spending is higher now as a share of total GDP than its long-term average, it is below what it averaged in the 1950&#8217;s and 1960&#8217;s, and is not way out of line. I would, however, note that the measure of government spending does not include transfer payments like Social Security, Medicare, or unemployment insurance. Those are considered part of Consumption.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, Investment is the most volatile of the components of GDP, and even if it were to return to the previous record low of 12.77% of GDP, that would be a 15.7% increase, assuming everything else showed no growth at all. A return to the long-term average would be a 44.5% increase.<br />
<br />
With commercial rents plunging and vacancy rates soaring, the value of commercial real estate is in free-fall. It thus seems unlikely that we will get any short-term recovery on investments in non-residential structures. Thus if we are going to get a rebound in non-residential fixed investment, it will most likely have to come from the equipment and software side. That would be a very powerful tonic for the likes of companies like<strong> Joy Global </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/joyg">JOYG</a>), <strong>Paccar </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/pcar">PCAR</a>) and <strong>Illinois Tool Works </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/itw">ITW</a>).<br />
<br />
However, will companies have a reason to invest in more equipment and software if the consumers are not buying? The key to that puzzle will most likely have to reside in the net exports area. At some point, we are going to have to get back to the point where were are running trade surpluses, where we export more than we import. Investments that reduce our oil import bill would also greatly help that effort.<br />
<br />
The only way that Consumption will decline as a share of GDP is if consumers grow their spending at a slower rate than their incomes grow, or if we have a real boom in the other three areas of the economy. With fiscal deficits at record levels as a share of the economy, it is probably not wise to look to the government to pick up substantial share of the economy -- although in a deep downturn it has to fill in by default (after all the four areas have to sum to 100%).<br />
<br />
Businesses have to think that people will buy their products for them to spend on building new factories and the equipment that goes into them, or they have to think that they can sell the goods abroad. Of course, if they can invest in things that cut costs, it is possible to have worthwhile investments even if they do not expand production, but those are probably in the minority.<br />
<br />
While I welcome the increase in GDP from whatever source right now, the fact that we continue to set new records for Consumption as a share of GDP is not healthy. Prior to the 4th Quarter of 2001, consumption had never exceeded 70% of GDP. Since then, it has been above that level in all but five quarters.<br />
<br />
Prior to the 2Q of 1990, Consumption had only exceeded 2/3 of the economy in just 3 quarters, out of 174 (1.7%). Since then, it has been above that level in 70 out of 78 quarters, or 89.7% of the time.<br />
<br />
Conversely, during the earlier period, private Investment had exceeded 15% of GDP in 141 quarters, or 81.0% of the time, but in the later period it has only been above 54 out of 74 quarters, or 69.2% of the time, and has been below that level for 8 straight quarters.  This does not bode well for future long-term growth, just as a company that has capital spending that consistently falls short of depreciation is not going to be a great long-term growth story.<br />
<br />
Of course, shrinking Consumption&#8217;s share of the economy is going to be very painful for the huge numbers of companies that depend on that 70%+ part of the U.S. economy. That would include almost all retailers, and vast parts of the service economy, as well as the makers of big-ticket discretionary items.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1257273792.bmp" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1257273805.jpg" alt="" /><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=JOYG">Read the full analyst report on "JOYG"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=PCAR">Read the full analyst report on "PCAR"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=ITW">Read the full analyst report on "ITW"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/the-shape-of-gdp-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magellan Health Tops Street &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/magellan-health-tops-street-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/magellan-health-tops-street-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral health services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coventry Health Care Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Health Services Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governmental agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magellan Health Services Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical management services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specialty Pharmacy;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tops Street;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WellCare Health Plans Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26756/Magellan+Health+Tops+Street+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>Magellan Health Services Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mgln">MGLN</a>) reported third quarter results last Friday. The company posted a 31.9% growth in net income to $31.0 million or 88 cents per share, compared to $23.5 million or 58 cents per share in the year-ago period, and easily surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 21 cents. The strong result was primarily driven by the acquisition of First Health coupled with the solid performance of the Specialty Pharmacy segment.<br />
<br />
Magellan Health offers managed behavioral healthcare, radiology benefits management and pharmaceutical management services to health plans, insurance companies, corporations, labor unions and various governmental agencies in the U.S. During July this year, the company completed the acquisition of First Health Services Corp., a subsidiary of <strong>Coventry Health Care Inc. </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cvh">CVH</a>). First Health provides pharmacy benefits administration, health care management and IT services to state Medicaid programs.<br />
<br />
The company said net revenues recorded a growth of 1.7% to $667.6 million, from $656.5 million in the prior-year quarter. The expansion was primarily driven by increased memberships, acquisition of First Health, new contracts and solid growth in the Specialty Pharmacy segment. However, growth in net revenues was partially offset by contract terminations and impact of minimum loss ratio requirements in public sector contracts.<br />
<br />
Magellan Health also announced that it has entered into a deal with <strong>WellCare Health Plans Inc. </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wcg">WCG</a>) to manage behavioral health services for all WellCare markets. Magellan expects the 3-year contract to add approximately 900,000 Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries and generate incremental annual revenue of $60 million. The contract expands on Magellan&#8217;s existing contract with WellCare in the state of Georgia.<br />
<br />
During the first 9 months of the year, Magellan generated $100.6 million of cash from operations, deploying $115.4 million towards acquisitions and $25.8 million towards capital expenditure. The company also utilized $213.4 million towards purchase of investments, while proceeds from matured investments were $247.6 million. The company also stated that it has repurchased 115,275 shares during the quarter for a total consideration of $3.7 million as per an ongoing $100 million share buyback program.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, bolstered by the better-than-expected quarterly performance, Magellan raised its full-year earnings guidance. The company now expects full-year net income to range between $85.3 million to $95.5 million, which equates to earnings per share of $2.41 to $2.70. Magellan earlier projected earnings per share to range between $2.04 and $2.59.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MGLN">Read the full analyst report on "MGLN"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CVH">Read the full analyst report on "CVH"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WCG">Read the full analyst report on "WCG"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/magellan-health-tops-street-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BioScrip Beats in Q3 &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/bioscrip-beats-in-q3-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/bioscrip-beats-in-q3-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to medications and management solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BioScrip Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVS Caremark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Express Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare payers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV/AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iron overload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MedcoHealth Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multiple Sclerosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organ transplant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical healthcare organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Health Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walgreen Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26744/BioScrip+Beats+in+Q3+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>BioScrip, Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BIOS">BIOS</a>) reported third-quarter earnings of 14 cents per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 10 cents. The company reported earnings of 6 cents in the year-ago period. Although earnings were better than expected, revenues declined 7.2% to $333.5 million. While the specialty business contributed $279 million to revenues, the pharmacy benefit management (PBM) business posted revenues of $54.5 million.<br />
 <br />
The decline in revenues was mainly due to the elimination of the Medicare Competitive Acquisition Program and the termination of the United Health Group organ transplant and HIV/AIDS contracts. This was partially offset by increased sales of higher margin infusion therapies and other specialty sales.<br />
 <br />
The company reported a sequential growth of 3% in specialty sales with several therapeutic areas like iron overload, multiple sclerosis (MS), oncology and infusion therapies recording double digit growth from the year-ago period. The oral oncology business should continue witnessing strong growth going forward.<br />
 <br />
Meanwhile, the company is working on growing its higher margin infusion business. Management reported that BioScrip currently has infusion capabilities in 23 markets. During the quarter, BioScrip also increased its sales force from 15 to 24 and added four new infusion sales representatives in October. The expansion of the higher margin infusion business should not only drive revenues, it should also help drive top-line growth.<br />
 <br />
Gross profit improved to $41.5 million mainly due to an improved product mix thanks to the elimination of lower margin business and improved supply chain programs. Operating profit improved to $6.7 million due to the improved product and therapy mix, which was partially offset by bad debt expense returning to normal levels. Meanwhile, cash collections from some states remained slow due to the slowing economy.<br />
 <br />
The company continued to make progress with its system implementation program. BioScrip now has 15 stores operating on the new platform and the company is looking to add six more stores by year end. BioScrip expects all its stores as well as mail operations to be operational by the end of the second quarter of 2010.<br />
 <br />
BioScrip, Inc. is a specialty pharmaceutical healthcare organization that partners with patients, physicians, healthcare payers and pharmaceutical manufacturers to provide access to medications and management solutions to optimize outcomes for chronic and other complex health care conditions. The company&#8217;s main competitors include <strong>CVS Caremark</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CVS">CVS</a>), <strong>Express Scripts</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ESRX">ESRX</a>), <strong>MedcoHealth Solutions</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MHS">MHS</a>) and <strong>Walgreen Co. </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/WAG">WAG</a>).<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BIOS">Read the full analyst report on "BIOS"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CVS">Read the full analyst report on "CVS"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=ESRX">Read the full analyst report on "ESRX"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MHS">Read the full analyst report on "MHS"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WAG">Read the full analyst report on "WAG"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/bioscrip-beats-in-q3-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coventry Tops Zacks Estimate &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/coventry-tops-zacks-estimate-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/coventry-tops-zacks-estimate-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coventry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coventry Health Care Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Health Services Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[managed healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid-Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitedhealth Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellpoint Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26711/Coventry+Tops+Zacks+Estimate+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>Coventry Health Care, Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cvh">CVH</a>) reported third quarter earnings of 66 cents per share, which was above the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 54 cents. The company earned 73 cents in the year-ago quarter.<br />
<br />
Total operating revenues for the reported quarter increased 17.8% to $3.44 billion from the previous year's $2.92 billion.  Revenues from managed care premiums rose 20% to $3.15 billion, while revenues from management services decreased to $290.9 million from $298.4 million a year earlier.<br />
<br />
Due to reduced commercial risk and commercial management membership, total enrollment in Coventry plans increased 0.55% to 5.24 million members, mainly on gains in the Medicare D prescription drug program. The membership in that program increased 81,000 from the prior quarter.<br />
<br />
Total operating expenses for the quarter came in at $3.29 billion, up 18.6% from the year ago quarter. Medical costs, the major operating expense component, rose to $2.66 billion from $2.20 billion last year. The medical loss ratio for the quarter (the proportion of premium revenue spent on providing medical care) reduced to 84.4 % from 86.4%.<br />
<br />
For the quarter, Coventry Health displayed continued growth in all Medicare products, with Medicare Coordinated Care Product (CCP) membership rising 38% from the third quarter of 2008. The commercial group risk premium yields rose to $304.13 per member per month in the quarter, which reflected a 6.1% increase from the year-ago quarter.<br />
<br />
Coventry ended the quarter with $1.71 billion cash and cash equivalents. Furthermore, Coventry exited the quarter with $1.71 billion in long-term debt. Coventry raised its fiscal 2009 earnings guidance to $2.01-$2.03, from the prior guidance of $1.85-$1.95 per share. The guidance excludes the impact of the First Health Services Corporation (FHSC) divestiture.<br />
<br />
Coventry operates as a managed healthcare company in the United States. The company operates local health plans that serve markets primarily in the Mid-Atlantic, Midwest and Southeast United States. The company competes with big players like<strong> Aetna Inc. </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aet">AET</a>), <strong>Unitedhealth Group, Inc. </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/unh">UNH</a>) and <strong>WellPoint Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wlp">WLP</a>).<br />
<br />
Currently we are Neutral on Coventry shares.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CVH">Read the full analyst report on "CVH"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UNH">Read the full analyst report on "UNH"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WLP">Read the full analyst report on "WLP"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/coventry-tops-zacks-estimate-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Torchmark Earnings Ebb &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/torchmark-earnings-ebb-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/torchmark-earnings-ebb-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Income Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance underwriting margin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNL Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26622/Torchmark+Earnings+Ebb+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><br />
Torchmark</strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/TMK">TMK</a>) reported third quarter operating earnings of $1.48 per share compared to $1.51 per share in the year-ago quarter. Results were affected by lower underwriting as well as lower excess investment income.<br />
<br />
Life premium revenue was $414.4 million versus $406.1 million in the prior year period. This was due to strong L ife sales in the quarter, primarily driven by the growth in its distribution channels: American Income Agency and Direct Response. Net sales of life insurance increased 9% year-over-year. Life insurance accounted for 72% of the company's insurance underwriting margin for the quarter and 62% of total premium revenue.<br />
<br />
Health premium revenue was $247.8 million versus $272.4 million in the prior year quarter, led by a decline in health sales. The company has experienced a drop in its LNL Agency. Health sales, excluding Medicare Part D, fell 39% year-over-year.<br />
<br />
Excess investment income &#8722; a measure to evaluate the performance of the Investment segment &#8722; declined 14% year-over-year to $71.2 million. Net investment income was flat even though average invested assets were up 6% over the year-ago quarter because the company held significantly more cash throughout the reported quarter than the year-ago quarter.<br />
<br />
For the full fiscal year 2009, Torchmark expects net operating income per share in the range of $5.90&#8211;$5.95, assuming no share repurchases. The previous guidance was $5.93&#8722;$6.08 per share. For 2010, earnings are expected to lie in the range of $6.05&#8211;$6.25 per share.<br />
<br />
Torchmark&#8217;s Life Insurance segment, which accounts for a major chunk of its underwriting income, is expected to remain under pressure due to recessionary market conditions. Higher debt costs and lower margins at Liberty National have pressured earnings. However, strong competitive position in attractive niche markets, an effective use of capital and low-cost operating structure will likely enable Torchmark to maintain superior returns. Therefore we retain a Neutral rating on the shares for now.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=TMK">Read the full analyst report on "TMK"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/torchmark-earnings-ebb-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GDP Notes &#8211; In Depth &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/gdp-notes-in-depth-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/gdp-notes-in-depth-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirk van Dijk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factory equipment;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kicker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Century Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Mutual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26642/GDP+Notes+-+In+Depth+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<em>Senior strategist Dirk van Dijk, CFA has issued notes on this morning's GDP numbers. These notes will be published in two separate blogs -- Growth Rates and Contributions to Growth.</em><br />
<br />
The recession is over!<br />
<br />
In the third quarter, GDP grew by 3.5%, comfortably ahead of expectations for 3.0% growth. This is a huge improvement over the 0.7% decline in the second quarter and the 6.4% plunge in the first quarter.<br />
<br />
The internals of the report were strong as well, although it appears that much of the growth came from things like the "Cash for Clunkers" (C4C) program and the extraordinary levels of support that are currently being given to the housing sector.<br />
<br />
I will first go over the percentage growth rates for the main components of GDP, and then how much each part contributed (or subtracted from the 3.5% growth rate). This is probably the more important part since the size of the different parts of GDP are very different, and a small percentage change in a big component can have more impact than a large change in a small component.<br />
<br />
Just as a reminder, GDP is equal to the sum of Consumer spending, Investment spending, Government spending and net exports, or Y = C + I + G + (X - M), and I will be using that framework for the discussion.<br />
<br />
<em><strong>Growth Rates</strong></em><br />
<br />
The overall 3.5% growth of GDP was almost matched by its biggest component, Personal Consumption expenditures, or PCE, which grew 3.4% -- a big improvement over the 0.7% decline in the second quarter and the 0.6% increase in the first three months of the year.<br />
<br />
It is important to note that during the recession consumer spending declined far less than did overall GDP, especially in the first quarter, so the consumer was becoming a much bigger part of the overall economy. This is not healthy over the long run, but at this point I think people are happy to get some growth wherever we can find it.<br />
<br />
Consumers spend on both Goods and Services, and Goods are broken down into Durable and Non-Durable goods. The big mover in the third quarter were Goods, which increased by 8.1% following a decline of 5.6% in the 2Q and an increase of 2.5% in the 1Q. Spending on Durable goods was the real driver, growing at an annualized rate of 22.3% in the 3Q, following a 5.6% decline in the 2q and a 3.9% increase in the 1Q.<br />
<br />
Spending on Non-Durable goods tends to be much more stable than spending on Durable goods. Non-Durable goods spending rose by 2.0%, reversing a 1.9% decline in the 2Q, which was in turn a reversal of a 1.9% increase in the 1Q.<br />
<br />
Spending on Services tends to be even more stable than spending on Non-Durable goods. Service spending grew at an annualized rate of 1.2% in the 2Q, up from a 0.2% increase in the 2Q and a 0.3% decline in the 1Q. Historically, spending on Durable goods has been one of the key drivers to get us out of a recession, just as not spending on Durable goods has been one of the key reasons for falling into recessions. It is the volatility in the sector that makes it important more than its absolute size.<br />
<br />
Now, you might wonder -- what caused the recession to be so nasty last winter when Consumer spending wasn&#8217;t really all that bad? The answer is that Investment really fell of a cliff. The good news is that it is starting to come back. Overall Gross Private Domestic investment grew at an 11.5% annualized rate in the 3Q, but it still has a lot of lost ground to make up from the earlier part of the year.<br />
<br />
In the second quarter, overall Investment spending fell at a 23.7% annualized rate. Now here is the kicker; that was actually a dramatic improvement over the 1Q when investment spending absolutely collapsed -- falling 50.5% -- clearly the biggest collapse in investment spending since the Great Depression (and it came on the heels of a 24.2% decline in the 4Q of 2008). To anyone who understood what was going on, those were really terrifying times, and the turnaround from them is absolutely spectacular.<br />
<br />
There are two basic types of Investment -- Fixed and Inventory -- and right now we are concerned with Fixed investment (I will cover Inventory later in the contributions to GDP part).<br />
<br />
Fixed investment is broken into two parts, Non Residential or business investment, and Residential investment, which is mostly homebuilding. Overall Fixed investment rose by 2.3% following declines of 12.5% in the 2Q and 39.0% in the 1Q. Business investment, however, continued to decline, but at a much slower rate, falling 2.5% after 9.6% and 39.2% declines in the 2Q and 1Q, respectively.<br />
<br />
With massive amounts of unused capacity, it is not surprising that businesses are cutting back on their capital spending still. Business investment comes in two flavors -- spending on structures like building new factories, malls and office buildings and spending on equipment and software to go into them. Spending on structures continues to be very weak, falling at a 9.0% annualized rate in the 3Q, but that marks an improvement over the 17.3% decline in the 2Q and the 43.6% collapse in the 1Q.<br />
<br />
With massive amounts of space sitting idle in offices and empty strip malls littering the landscape, look for new investment in commercial real estate to continue to decline in coming quarters. <strong>Moody&#8217;s </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mco">MCO</a>) has estimated that the value of commercial real estate has plunged by 41% since the peak a little over a year ago, and that is hardly an inducement to build more. If a business needs the space, it's far cheaper to just buy some that already exists.<br />
<br />
Spending on Equipment and Software (E&#38;S), on the other hand, is starting to come back, if only feebly -- rising 1.1% after a 4.9% decline in the 2Q and a 36.4% plunge in the 1Q. Look for some stability in this line going forward as the new <strong>Microsoft </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/msft">MSFT</a>) operating system will probably generate a new PC cycle, but with capacity utilization still around 70% I would not expect a boom in orders for new factory equipment.<br />
<br />
The real star of Fixed investment, though, came on the residential side, which rose 23.4%. This is the first increase in almost four years, and follows declines of 23.3% in the 2Q and 38.2% in the 1Q. The long string of declines had brought residential investment to a record low share of GDP. The extraordinary support of the housing sector by the government, including the first-time buyer tax credit -- the Fed buying up $1.25 Trillion of <strong>Fannie Mae</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fnm">FNM</a>) and <strong>Freddie Mac</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fre">FRE</a>)-backed paper to artificially suppress mortgage rates, and the FHA acting like the old New Century Financial or Washington Mutual on their worst days -- have played a big role in the turnaround. I seriously question the sustainability of it after the support is removed, and I don&#8217;t think the support can continue indefinitely.<br />
<br />
Government spending grew by 2.3% in the 3Q, a big slowdown from the 6.7% increase in the 2Q, but more than the 2.6% decline in the 1Q. It was all at the Federal level, where spending rose at an annual rate of 7.9% down from a 11.4% increase in the 2Q, but up from the 4.3% decline in the 1Q. Remember this measure of government spending does not include spending on transfer payments like Social Security and Medicare, which are largely captured in the Consumption numbers.<br />
<br />
Defense spending was the big driver -- remember we are still a nation fighting two wars. Defense grew at an annual rate of 8.4% down from a 14.0% rate of increase in the 2Q, but up from a 5.1% decline in the 1Q.  Non-Defense spending rose at a 6.8% annual rate following a 6.1% increase in the 2Q and a 2.5% decline in the 1Q.<br />
<br />
State and local spending, on the other hand, is constrained by balanced budget laws and falling tax revenues. It declined 1.1% in the 3Q following a 3.9% increase in the 2Q and a 1.5% decline in the 1Q. They were able to increase spending in the 2Q due to support for the Federal government as part of the stimulus package. Now that support looks like it is being overwhelmed by the plunge in property, income and sales taxes.<br />
<br />
International trade has started to rebound, and we saw an increase in both imports and exports. Increasing exports are good for GDP and increases in Imports are bad for GDP, and unfortunately imports rose more than did exports. We were able to improve our overseas sales by 14.7% in the 3Q -- a nice turnaround from the 4.1% decline in the 2Q and the 29.9% plunge in the 1Q.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, we also increase what we bought from overseas by 16.4%, a big turnaround from the 14.7% decline in the 2Q and the 36.4% plunge in the first three months of the year. Keep in mind that we import a lot more than we export, so not only was the percentage increase bigger for imports, it was coming off a higher base.<br />
<em><br />
Look for the Contributions to Growth blog to be uploaded shortly.</em><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MCO">Read the full analyst report on "MCO"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MSFT">Read the full analyst report on "MSFT"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=FNM">Read the full analyst report on "FNM"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=FRE">Read the full analyst report on "FRE"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/gdp-notes-in-depth-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aetna Surpasses, Outlook Cautious &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/aetna-surpasses-outlook-cautious-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/aetna-surpasses-outlook-cautious-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26611/Aetna+Surpasses%2C+Outlook+Cautious+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>Aetna Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aet">AET</a>) reported third quarter earnings per share of 69 cents, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 66 cents. However, earnings declined 38% compared to $1.12 reported in the prior-year period due to a lower commercial underwriting margin, an increase in pension expenses partially offset by the lower number of shares outstanding year-over-year.<br />
<br />
Revenues during the quarter increased 9% to $8.72 billion compared to $8 billion in the third quarter of 2008, driven by a 9% increase in premium revenues and a 5% increase in fees and other revenue.<br />
<br />
Total medical membership rose 7.3% to 19 million at the end of the reported quarter compared to the year-ago period, but declined 25,000 sequentially. The same trend was witnessed in case of pharmacy and dental membership as well, both of which declined sequentially by 79,000 to 11.155 million and 386, 000 to 14.183 million, respectively.<br />
<br />
The three business segments of Aetna &#8211; Health Care, Group Insurance and Large Case Pensions recorded robust revenue growth compared to the prior-year period. They recorded revenues of $8 billion (up 9.4%), $528.2 million (up 3.3%) and $138.4 million (up 11.6%), respectively.<br />
<br />
The three sub-divisions of Health Care &#8211; Commercial, Medicare and Medicaid recorded an increase in premium by 6.5%, 18.5% and 57.6%, respectively. However, Health Care costs increased considerably during the quarter. Given the situation, medical benefit ratio (MBR) -- which measures the proportion of premiums received by the company that is used to pay patient medical claims -- increased by 470 basis points for the three groups taken together. Commercial MBR increased the most (530 basis points) year over year to 85.6%.<br />
<br />
The huge increase in Commercial MBR was primarily due to greater-than-anticipated costs from the H1N1 flu and higher COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985) participation. Under COBRA, people can continue their employer sponsored insurance coverage even after they lose their jobs.<br />
<br />
Aetna projects full-year 2009 operating earnings per share of $2.75. Earlier, while announcing the second-quarter results, the company had expected operating earnings in the range of $2.75 to $2.90 per share. However, we believe increased medical costs have forced the company to project earnings at the lowest level of its previously issued guidance.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/aetna-surpasses-outlook-cautious-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DrStockPick.com Stock Report!  10/26/09, ADI, CSRH, IBM, PRFT, HUM, RLH</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-102609-adi-csrh-ibm-prft-hum-rlh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-102609-adi-csrh-ibm-prft-hum-rlh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stock Pick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisement services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analog Devices Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consorteum Holdings Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crown Equity Holdings Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cvent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data-conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data-conversion technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general session]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare applications;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information ;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information technology consulting firm  serving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandalay Bay;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perficient Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable device;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power-efficient communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Lion Hotels Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senior Citizens Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signal  processing applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock featured on our site;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactical Connections Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Senior Citizens Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-based software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drstockpick.com/?p=4256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick HOT News &#38; Alerts!
_______________________________________

FREE Daily Stock Alerts From DrStockPick.com

_______________________________________
Monday October 26, 2009
DrStockPick.com Stock Report!
**************************************************************

Consorteum Holdings  Inc. (OTCBB: CSRH) announced that it has signed a Letter of Intent with  Tactical Connections Inc. to provide various financial services to major tier  one US, Canadian and European manufacturing and retail industries.
Analog Devices, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-102609-adi-csrh-ibm-prft-hum-rlh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AmSurg Beats Estimates Marginally  &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/amsurg-beats-estimates-marginally-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/amsurg-beats-estimates-marginally-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26378/AmSurg+Beats+Estimates+Marginally++-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><br />
AmSurg Corp.</strong>'s (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AMSG">AMSG</a>) third-quarter earnings per share came in at 44 cents, slightly above the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 43 cents and the year-ago performance of 39 cents.
<p>Revenues for the quarter increased 11% to $167.8 million compared to $150.7 million in the year ago period. The company reported a 6% rise in net earnings to $13.4 million, compared to $12.6 million in the third quarter of 2008. Third-quarter results included a negative impact from the effect of the revision of the Medicare payment system for ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs).</p>
<p>While the addition of 19 centers in operation during the last twelve months was primarily responsible for the robust growth in revenue, performance of same-center revenues remained lackluster due to the current economic conditions. Additionally, the Medicare rule revision reduced same center revenues by approximately 100 basis points.</p>
<p>Operating margin recorded a decline of 106 basis points to 33.82%, compared to 34.88% in the third quarter of 2008, driven by an increase in salary-related costs as well as other operating expenses.</p>
<p>AmSurg's balance sheet improved further after the robust performance. The company's cash flow from operating activities was $61.1 million at the end of the reported quarter, up from $55.5 million in the corresponding period last year. We are pleased to note that AmSurg made prudent use of the available funds (after capital expenditures of $5.4 million) by reducing its debt burden by $21.8 million.</p>
<p>As a result of the improvement in capital structure, total debt to capitalization at the quarter's end improved to 32.6% from 37.2% at the end of 2008. In addition, the ratio of total debt to trailing 12 months EBITDA also improved to 2, compared with 2.4 at the end of 2008.</p>
<p>Based on a strong performance, AmSurg raised the lower end of its previously-announced 2009 earnings outlook. The company now expects revenues and earnings in the range of $660 million - $680 million and $1.70 - $1.71, respectively. AmSurg reaffirmed its guidance for the addition of 13-16 centers in 2009, a majority of which are expected to be completed later this year.</p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#038;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#038;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#038;t=AMSG">Read the full analyst report on "AMSG"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com" alt="Investment Research">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/amsurg-beats-estimates-marginally-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Long Look at the National Debt</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/a-long-look-at-the-national-debt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/a-long-look-at-the-national-debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=18756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short-Term Deficits Pale in Comparison to Unfunded Liabilities on the Horizon
Dwindling U.S. economic activity and accelerating government spending resulted in a record $455 billion federal budget deficit for fiscal year 2008. During the same trying period, the total national debt increased to about $10 trillion, and the forecast for 2009 was for an even larger [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/a-long-look-at-the-national-debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Municipal Haste</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/municipal-haste/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/municipal-haste/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=18754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The administration has stated that it intends to raise tax rates on people with incomes in the highest tax brackets in order to finance programs such as health-care reform.
The current top federal income tax rate of 35% is low by historical standards but is scheduled to revert to its original 39.6% rate after 2010. Meanwhile, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/municipal-haste/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare Reform Becoming Less Likely</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/politics-and-your-money/healthcare-reform-becoming-less-likely/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/politics-and-your-money/healthcare-reform-becoming-less-likely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Your Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Medical Association;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Majority Leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PARTIAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electionstocks.com/?p=665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bill to freeze cuts to doctors#8217; Medicare payments #8211; one that should have been heavily bipartisan #8211; is now in serious danger of passing. The American Medical Association (AMA) promised Majority Leader Harry Reid (D) 27 Republican votes, but now it appears there are as few as two.
Undoubtedly, 27 is an ambitious number for [...]img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ElectionStocks/~4/hXoAMsH2cN8" height="1" width="1"/]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/politics-and-your-money/healthcare-reform-becoming-less-likely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allscripts Benefits &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/allscripts-benefits-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/allscripts-benefits-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cerner Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information Technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertyville;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MedAssets Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misys Plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Leahy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Systems Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26218/Allscripts+Benefits+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MDRX">MDRX</a>) recently benefited from the $1 million federal grant secured by U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy and Vermont Information Technology Leaders Inc. that will provide incentives to physicians and independent pharmacies of Vermont to adopt health information technology. Allscripts benefited from this move as it has recently entered into a strategic alliance with Vermont Information Technology Leaders Inc. <br />
<br />
Vermont Information Technology is a non-profit organization facilitating the expanded use of health care IT in Vermont. Vermont is the most improved state in the U.S. for electronic prescribing and Allscripts has a strong presence there. Per the recently entered agreement with Allscripts, the health care providers of Vermont will use Allscripts products and services through Vermont Information Technology Leaders at preferred pricing. <br />
<br />
Allscripts offers physicians three different electronic health record (EHR) systems, all of which have a world-class functionality. It has been seen that the effective use of EHR systems reduces medical errors, enhances clinical quality and leads to better patient outcomes by accessing patient records in real time. <br />
<br />
The U.S. government is increasingly emphasizing the use of EHR systems these days. This is evident from the recent Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (H.R. 6331) passed by the government. The Act, for the first time ever, provides financial incentives to physicians who adopt electronic prescribing (ePrescribing), requires adoption by 2011, and delays any reduction in fees for treating Medicare patients. <br />
<br />
Libertyville, Illinois-based Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc. is a leading provider of clinical software and information solutions for physicians. In Oct 2008, the company merged with Misys Plc &#8722; a global applications software and services company &#8722; to form Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions Inc. <br />
<br />
Allscripts faces strong competition from <strong>Cerner Corporation</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CERN">CERN</a>), <strong>Quality Systems Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/QSII">QSII</a>) and <strong>MedAssets Inc. </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MDAS">MDAS</a>).<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#038;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#038;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#038;t=MDRX">Read the full analyst report on "MDRX"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#038;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#038;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#038;t=CERN">Read the full analyst report on "CERN"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#038;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#038;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#038;t=QSII">Read the full analyst report on "QSII"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#038;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#038;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#038;t=MDAS">Read the full analyst report on "MDAS"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com" alt="Investment Research">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/allscripts-benefits-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dynamic Response Group, Inc. (DRGZ.OB) Deploys Nationwide Diabetic Supplies Campaign to Hispanics</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/dynamic-response-group-inc-drgz-ob-deploys-nationwide-diabetic-supplies-campaign-to-hispanics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/dynamic-response-group-inc-drgz-ob-deploys-nationwide-diabetic-supplies-campaign-to-hispanics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diabetic product supply subsidiary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct-to-consumer diabetics products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dynamic Response Group Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medico Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melissa K. Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online presence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Islands;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=18529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dynamic Response Group, Inc. CEO Melissa K. Rice today announced the national roll-out of Medico Express, DRG&#8217;s diabetic product supply subsidiary. This campaign will optimize its media footprint by tightly focusing its marketing strategy to the Hispanic population. 
DRG has projected that, by being the only company to tap into this niche market on a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/dynamic-response-group-inc-drgz-ob-deploys-nationwide-diabetic-supplies-campaign-to-hispanics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humana Expands in California &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/humana-expands-in-california-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/humana-expands-in-california-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[care physician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigna Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer groups;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical insurance benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitedhealth Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25709/Humana+Expands+in+California+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Recently <strong>Humana Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/HUM">HUM</a>) announced that its Medicare coverage in 3 California countries is expanding. Members eligible for Medicare in Fresno , San Bernardino and Riverside can enroll in a Humana Gold Plus health maintenance organization (HMO) plan. Coverage would be effective from Jan. 1, 2010. <br />
<br />
The expansion has been approved by the Centers for Medicare &#38; Medicaid Services (CMS). The gold plus plan acts as a supplemental coverage to Medicare. Members can choose a primary care physician in the plan network. <br />
<br />
The other benefits of the plan include no or low monthly plan premiums, low co-payments for visits to doctors and annual routine physicals, coverage for most annual screenings at no charge, and worldwide emergency coverage. The persons opting for this plan will enjoy discounts on vision and hearing care, prescriptions, and complimentary and alternative medicine. <br />
<br />
The period for enrollment to the Humana Gold Plus HMO plan stretches from November 15 till Dec. 31, 2009. However, participants in the Medicare Part D program can enroll till March 31, 2010. The Medicare program is a federal program offering hospital and medical insurance benefits to persons aged 65 and above, in addition to some disabled persons below 65 years of age. <br />
<br />
Through this expansion, Humana is looking to provide wider choice to meet the changing needs of senior citizens and disabled people. Humana, which provides health and supplemental benefit plans for employer groups, government benefit programs and individuals in the US, competes with players such as <strong>Aetna Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AET">AET</a>), <strong>Cigna Corp.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CI">CI</a>) and <strong>Unitedhealth Group, Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/UNH">UNH</a>). Currently, we are Neutral on Humana.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=HUM">Read the full analyst report on "HUM"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UNH">Read the full analyst report on "UNH"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CI">Read the full analyst report on "CI"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/humana-expands-in-california-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Performer for Fri: WellCare (WCG)  &#8211; Zacks #1 Rank Top Performers</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-performer-for-fri-wellcare-wcg-zacks-1-rank-top-performers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-performer-for-fri-wellcare-wcg-zacks-1-rank-top-performers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Giaquinto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heath Schiesser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[managed care services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President/CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WCG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/12374/Top+Performer+for+Fri%3A+WellCare+%28WCG%29++-+Zacks+%231+Rank+Top+Performers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The share price for <b>WellCare Health Plans, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/WCG">WCG</a>) is nearing a 10% gain Friday afternoon, which puts this company on the Zacks #1 Rank Top Performers List. <p>

<table align="right"><tr><td></td></tr></table>

Volume has surged to nearly 1.5 million shares today, compared to the daily average of 444,000. </p><p>

Today's share price gain comes in the wake of Wednesday's preliminary CBO assessment of the health care reform bill, which suggested that it could cost less than the White House had expected (given a certain degree of savings that some experts deem to be unrealistic). </p><p>  

Earnings estimates for WCG have been moving steadily higher in recent weeks, and the company announced a solid second-quarter performance in late July. </p><p>

It is scheduled to report third-quarter numbers on Nov 4. </p><p> 

WCG provides managed care services exclusively for government-sponsored health care programs, focusing on Medicaid and Medicare. It offers a variety of health plans for families, children, and the aged, blind and disabled, as well as prescription drug plans. It serves about 2.4 million members. </p><p> 

WCG is the only company from the Medical-HMO industry on today's Zacks #1 Rank List, which includes 221 stocks. </p><p> 

<b>Earnings Estimates</b></p><p>  

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for this year is at $2.93 per share, which is up 41% from $2.08 in 3 months and up 2.4% from $2.86 in 2 months. </p><p> 

During its second-quarter report, WCG updated its financial outlook for the year, stating a guidance between $2.75 and $2.95 per share. </p><p> 

Meanwhile, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for next year has gained 9.7% in 3 months to $2.37 per share. Furthermore, the past 30 days has seen an advance of 3.5% from $2.29. </p><p> 

<b>Second-Quarter Report</b></p><p> 

As mentioned above, WCG will report its third-quarter results early next month. At the moment, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter is at 67 cents, up a penny in 30 days. </p><p> 

For its second quarter, WCG announced earnings per share of 88 cents, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by more than 131%. </p><p> 

Premium revenue advanced 9% to $1.8 billion from last year, thanks to increased Medicare Advantage and Medicaid plan premium revenue. </p><p> 

"Like other government program health plans, we have a challenging 2010 ahead of us," stated President/CEO Heath Schiesser. </p><p> 

"We are committed to continuing to make progress in the reliability of our operations, improvements in health care quality and management of our costs," he continued. </p><p> <a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-performer-for-fri-wellcare-wcg-zacks-1-rank-top-performers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odyssey Healthcare, Inc. &#8211; Value &#8211; Zacks Rank Buy</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/odyssey-healthcare-inc-value-zacks-rank-buy-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/odyssey-healthcare-inc-value-zacks-rank-buy-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Ryniec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home healthcare aides;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Lefton;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/12328/Odyssey+Healthcare%2C+Inc.+-+Value+-+Zacks+Rank+Buy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Odyssey Healthcare, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ODSY">ODSY</a>) surprised on estimates 3 out of the last 4 quarters by an average of 29.37%. The hospice provider is cheap, trading with a PEG ratio of just 0.91.<p ALIGN="left">

<b>Company Description</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

Odyssey Healthcare provides hospice care in more than 30 states for terminally ill patients and their families. ODSY offers pain management and addresses the psychological and spiritual needs of the patients and their families.</p><p ALIGN="left">

Odyssey uses nurses, doctors, home healthcare aides, social workers, chaplains, bereavement counselors and trained volunteers to provide care in patients' homes, nursing homes or assisted living facilities.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Odyssey Surprised in the Second Quarter by 17.39%</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

On Aug 4, Odyssey reported second quarter results that beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 4 cents. Earnings per share increased 125% to 27 cents from 12 cents in the year ago quarter. The Zacks Consensus Estimate called for 23 cents.</p><p ALIGN="left">

Net patient service revenue continued to increase, rising by 6% to $170.3 million from $160.7 million in the second quarter of last year. Volume improved in May and June after a slow start in April prompting the average daily patient census to rise to 12,268 from 12,186 in the first quarter.</p><p ALIGN="left">

The company has to contend with Medicare Hospice Wage Index among other government set rates.</p><p ALIGN="left">

"I am also very pleased with our Medicare cap contractual during the quarter," said Robert Lefton, CEO. </p><p ALIGN="left">

"Even if you exclude the $534,000 positive adjustment related to the 2007 Medicare cap year, we still had a reduction in our net Medicare cap contractual of an additional $500,000, pre-tax, as we recovered amounts accrued during prior quarters for the current Medicare cap year as a result of changes in patient mix and increased admissions in some of our cap markets," he added.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>2009 Zacks Consensus Estimate Rises</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

Third quarter estimates have been holding over the last 60 days at 25 cents per share. But the 2009 Zacks Consensus Estimate is up 9 cents to $1.03 in the last 90 days. 1 analyst out of 7 covering analysts has raised in the last 30 days.</p><p ALIGN="left">

Analysts expect year over year earnings growth of 73.85%.</p><p ALIGN="left">

Odyssey is scheduled to report third quarter results on Oct 27.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Value Fundamentals</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

Odyssey Healthcare is a Zacks #1 Rank (strong buy) stock. It is attractively valued with a forward P/E of 12.3. It has a price-to-book ratio of 1.87. The company also has a solid 5-year average return on equity (ROE) of 13.93%.</p><p ALIGN="left">


<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/odyssey-healthcare-inc-value-zacks-rank-buy-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s Mafia: Medicare Fraud &#8211; Less Risk, More Reward</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/todays-mafia-medicare-fraud-less-risk-more-reward/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/todays-mafia-medicare-fraud-less-risk-more-reward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stockmasters Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1744 at http://thestockmasters.com</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p
img align=right src=http://usversusthem.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/sopranos-thugs.jpg alt=sopranos /Why risk running gambling operations, loan sharking and labor racketeering when you can milk span style=color: #3366ffstrongMedicare for $25,000 a day while risking a relatively modest 10 years in prison if convicted on a single count?/strong/span  br /
Today two Miami clinic operators have been convicted in what investigators say was a $51 million HIV infusion fraud case.  br /
emTimes have changed/em.
/p
ppa href=http://thestockmasters.com/node/1744read more/a/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/todays-mafia-medicare-fraud-less-risk-more-reward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DrStockPick.com Stock Report! 10/06/09, COLB, BTN, GPX, HUM, FSTR, ECOS</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-100609-colb-btn-gpx-hum-fstr-ecos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-100609-colb-btn-gpx-hum-fstr-ecos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stock Pick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-888-318-7969]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allegheny  River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allegheny;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ballantyne Strong Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cfo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Learning Officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia Banking System Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David  Hice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cinema projection equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diverse applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EcoloCap Solutions Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electrical Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fresno;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gateway Subway Station]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Physics Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GP Strategies Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HALO Renewable Energy LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humana Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John P.  Wilmers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Herrmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L.B. Foster Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micro Bubble Technologies Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omni Berkshire Place  Hotel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail products;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riverside;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Bernardino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Research Associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanwix  Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultimate energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drstockpick.com/?p=3853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick HOT News &#38; Alerts!
_______________________________________

FREE Daily Stock Alerts From DrStockPick.com

_______________________________________
Tuesday October 6, 2009
DrStockPick.com Stock Report!
**************************************************************

Columbia Banking System, Inc. (Nasdaq:  COLB) expects to report third quarter 2009 financial results on  Thursday, October 29, 2009 at 6:15 a.m. PDT. Management will discuss these  results on a conference call scheduled for that afternoon [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-100609-colb-btn-gpx-hum-fstr-ecos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMCI, GRMN, AQNM, CVS, CSRH, LVLT, CVAT, LMT, DrStockPick.com Stock Report!</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/imci-grmn-aqnm-cvs-csrh-lvlt-cvat-lmt-drstockpick-com-stock-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/imci-grmn-aqnm-cvs-csrh-lvlt-cvat-lmt-drstockpick-com-stock-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stock Pick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[31 million Military Network Protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisement services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board member]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavitation Technologies Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Mandeville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cobra (GPSM2500) Car GPS Receiver;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colocation services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Springs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consorteum Holdings Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crown Equity Holdings Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVS Caremark Corporation;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D. C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark fiber services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald W. Upson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garmin Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICG Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infinite Group Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leader in the development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Level 3 Communications Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moberly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outdated technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment transaction processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[principal partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[producer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional investment analyst and consultant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed Internet protocol services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRS Engineering Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock featured on our site;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systems technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology initiatives;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology programs;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trans Screen Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegetable oil refining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual private network services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.consorteum.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.crowntradingsystems.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.crwenews.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.drstockpick.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.pcsoyenergy.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.processconcepts.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.srsengineering.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.stock-ir.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drstockpick.com/?p=3789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick HOT News &#38; Alerts!
_________________________________________

FREE Daily Stock Alerts From DrStockPick.com

_________________________________________

Friday October 2, 2009
DrStockPick.com Stock Report!
IMCI, GRMN, AQNM, CVS, CSRH, LVLT, CVAT, LMT
**************************************************************
IMCI, Infinite Group Inc., IMCI.OB
IMCI is a world-class IT services and solutions provider serving a range of government and commercial organizations. Headquartered in Pittsford, New York, with offices in the Washington, D.C., [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/imci-grmn-aqnm-cvs-csrh-lvlt-cvat-lmt-drstockpick-com-stock-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allscripts Beats Expectations &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/allscripts-beats-expectations-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/allscripts-beats-expectations-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cerner Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertyville;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MedAssets Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misys Plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Systems Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25338/Allscripts+Beats+Expectations+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<br />
Yesterday, <strong>Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mdrx">MDRX</a>) reported earnings per share of 15 cents for the first quarter of fiscal 2010, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 13 cents. The company reported earnings of 18 cents in the year-ago period.<br />
<br />
Revenues for the quarter were $167.5 million, compared to $164.7 million in the year-ago quarter. The company reported strong bookings in the quarter. Total bookings were $97.5 million, increasing roughly 47% year over year. The growth can be primarily attributed to strong software as a service (SAS) transactions. SAS bookings were $25.1 million, compared to $13.9 million in the year-ago quarter.<br />
<br />
A higher SAS booking is an indication of an increasing trend among physicians to use the Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. This is buoyed by the recent Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (H.R. 6331) passed by the U.S. government that provides incentives to physicians who will use EHR 2011 onwards.<br />
<br />
Allscripts reported an expansion in margins. Gross margin for the quarter was 54.7%, compared to 53.9% in the year-ago quarter. Net margin was roughly 13.3%, versus 9.0% in the year-ago quarter.<br />
<br />
Allscripts ended the quarter with a cash balance of $86.9 million, increasing approximately 18% sequentially. The increase was primarily due to a strong cash flow of roughly $21.3 million from the company&#8217;s operations. Long-term debt stood at roughly $40 million at the end of the quarter.   <br />
<br />
Allscripts provided guidance for the full fiscal year 2010. Revenues are expected in the range of $680 million to $700 million. Earnings per share are estimated to be in the range of 59 cents to 61 cents. The company expects to record $11 million in stock-based compensation expenses.  <br />
<br />
Libertyville, IL-based Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. is a leading provider of clinical software and information solutions for physicians. In Oct. 2008, the company merged with Misys Plc, a global applications software and services company, to form Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. &#8232;&#8232;Allscripts faces strong competition from<strong> Cerner Corporation</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cern">CERN</a>), <strong>Quality Systems Inc. </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/qsii">QSII</a>) and <strong>MedAssets Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mdas">MDAS</a>).<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MDRX">Read the full analyst report on "MDRX"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CERN">Read the full analyst report on "CERN"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=QSII">Read the full analyst report on "QSII"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MDAS">Read the full analyst report on "MDAS"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/allscripts-beats-expectations-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DrStockPick.com Stock Report! 9/30/09, AET, OWVI, BYHL, REED, XSEL, FADV</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-93009-aet-owvi-byhl-reed-xsel-fadv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-93009-aet-owvi-byhl-reed-xsel-fadv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stock Pick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank & POS Terminal Maintenance Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BayHill Capital Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chain store retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community-specific wireless broadband suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment media;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EnticeLabs Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Advantage Corporation;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated candidate relationship management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet  platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[label products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare Supplement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NuPay System (U.S.) Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One World Ventures Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private label products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recruitment advertising;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reed’s Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultimate Fighting Championship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless broadband access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xinhua Sports & Entertainment Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yonder Media Inc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drstockpick.com/?p=3733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick HOT News &#38; Alerts!
_______________________________________

FREE Daily Stock Alerts From DrStockPick.com

_______________________________________
Wednesday September 30, 2009
DrStockPick.com Stock Report!
**************************************************************

Eligible Medicare beneficiaries  in Virginia now can obtain coverage for certain expenses not covered by original  Medicare under a set of individual Medicare Supplement plans offered by  Aetna (NYSE: AET).
One World Ventures,  Inc. (PINKSHEETS: OWVI) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-93009-aet-owvi-byhl-reed-xsel-fadv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allscripts Allies with Vermont IT &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/allscripts-allies-with-vermont-it-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/allscripts-allies-with-vermont-it-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cerner Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertyville;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MedAssets Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misys Plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Systems Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25327/Allscripts+Allies+with+Vermont+IT+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mdrx">MDRX</a>) entered a strategic alliance with Vermont Information Technology Leaders, Inc., the non-profit organization facilitating the expanded use of healthcare IT in Vermont. Per the agreement, the health care providers of Vermont will use Allscripts products and services through Vermont Information Technology Leaders at preferred pricing.<br />
<br />
The strategic alliance is a win-win for both companies. It will enable both the organizations to leverage their expertise in Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. Allscripts will benefit from its strong presence in Vermont and competitive product portfolio. The company offers physicians three different EHR systems, all of which have a world-class functionality.<br />
<br />
The U.S. government is putting increasing emphasis on the use of EHR systems these days. This is evident from the recent Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (H.R. 6331) passed by the government. The Act, for the first time ever, provides financial incentives to physicians who adopt electronic prescribing (ePrescribing), requires adoption by 2011, and delays any reduction in fees for treating Medicare patients.<br />
<br />
It has been seen that the effective use of EHR systems reduces medical errors, enhances clinical quality and leads to better patient outcomes by accessing patient records at real-time.<br />
<br />
Libertyville, IL-based Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. is a leading provider of clinical software and information solutions for physicians. In Oct. 2008, the company merged with Misys Plc, a global applications software and services company, to form Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc.<br />
<br />
Allscripts faces strong competition from <strong>Cerner Corporation</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cern">CERN</a>), <strong>Quality Systems Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/qsii">QSII</a>) and <strong>MedAssets Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mdas">MDAS</a>).<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MDRX">Read the full analyst report on "MDRX"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CERN">Read the full analyst report on "CERN"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=QSII">Read the full analyst report on "QSII"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MDAS">Read the full analyst report on "MDAS"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/allscripts-allies-with-vermont-it-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DrStockPick.com Stock Report! 9/23/09, PLUG, PSPM, ELRN, RIND, RBRM, VNO</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-92309-plug-pspm-elrn-rind-rbrm-vno/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-92309-plug-pspm-elrn-rind-rbrm-vno/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stock Pick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annual general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthritis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cellcom Israel Ltd.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clal Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discount Investment Corporation Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elron Electronic Industries Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy businesses;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel cell solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GenDrive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general business purposes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDB Development Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments  Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetVision Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peripheral neuropathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plug Power Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PureSpectrum Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Mark Gilbert Civil Rights Museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReBuilder Medical Technologies Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Industries Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savannah;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vornado Realty L.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vornado Realty Trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drstockpick.com/?p=3599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick HOT News &#38; Alerts!
_______________________________________

FREE Daily Stock Alerts From DrStockPick.com

_______________________________________
Wednesday September 23, 2009
DrStockPick.com Stock Report!
**************************************************************

Plug Power Inc.  (Nasdaq:PLUG), a leader in providing clean, reliable energy solutions,  today announced that its GenDrive(tm) fuel cell solution has exceeded a combined  total run time of one million operating hours at material handling customer [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-92309-plug-pspm-elrn-rind-rbrm-vno/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>September 21st CEOcast Weekly Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/september-21st-ceocast-weekly-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/september-21st-ceocast-weekly-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[27th Annual Lab Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Cell Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americas Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amyotrophic lateral sclerosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America Securities;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canaccord Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carnival Cruise Lines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEL-SCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Client Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConAgra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cord Injuries;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dairyland Cycle Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Goldberg;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dealer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy conversion efficiency;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy make]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enzo Biochem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enzo Clinical Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extremely promising technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agency;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil energy sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Mills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geographic  information systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governmental agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green house gas emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Griffin Securities;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1 virus;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceweb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identification technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ImmunoCellular Therapeutics Ltd.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated biotechnology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iplicity Cloud Storage Appliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iplicity Cloud Storage Appliance product line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iplicity Unified Storage Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Krenitsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead product candidate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Gehrig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass production systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorcycle insurance industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multikine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Program Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Renewable Energy Laboratories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuralstem;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-obligation insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal vehicle insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Stark;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pioneer Behavioral Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PositiveID Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio frequency identification systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBC Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RECEPTORS LLC;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research-In-Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rite Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seven Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar conversion technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar product;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sparta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sparta Commercial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speculative energy markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinal cord injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steel Vault Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage technology company specializing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swine Flu;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin-film solar technologies;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment of brain and other cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Food and Drug  Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccine developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VeriChip Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XsunX;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=17971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies featured in this edition of the newsletter: ACTC, CVM, CUR, DKAM, ENZ, IMUC, IWEB, PHC, SVUL, SRCO, SVUL, XSNX 
Markets extended their winning streak yet again this week, as all ten sectors of the S&#38;P 500 finished in positive territory and markets hit fresh highs for the year once again, despite the lack of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/september-21st-ceocast-weekly-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>September 14th CEOcast Weekly Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/september-14th-ceocast-weekly-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/september-14th-ceocast-weekly-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amnon Gonenne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balance sheet financing solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEL-SCI Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central nervous system diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Suisse Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enzo Biochem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enzo Clinical Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enzo Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enzo Life Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fulfillment services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs Communacopia Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Planet Bioengineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Head of Science and Innovation Portfolio Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare industry experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highland Ridge Hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highland Ridge PHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identification tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity security products;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ImmunoCellular Therapeutics Ltd.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infectious Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infectious Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated biotechnology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jefferies & Co. Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jianou Lvjian FoodsStuff Co. Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP Morgan Diversified Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MabCure Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mohan Chellani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiple myeloma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuralstem;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ONE Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PALM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHC Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philadelphia fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PositiveID Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quest Diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBC Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roche Group;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt Lake City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senior Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senior manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seven Hills Behavioral Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steel Vault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapeutic Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThinkEquity;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Weisel Partners;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three day Deutsche Bank Securities Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Finance Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transplantation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment of brain and other cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment Of Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment of infectious diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VeriChip Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veteran’s Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President of Scientific Affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=17807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies featured in this edition of the newsletter: CUR, CVM, ENZ, IMUC, MBCI, ONEZ, PHC, SVUL
Markets finished in positive territory yet again during this holiday shortened week despite the lack of any significant developments on either the corporate or economic fronts.  All told, the Dow gained 164 points to close at 9605, up 1.7% [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/september-14th-ceocast-weekly-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with John Mauldin</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/interview-with-john-mauldin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/interview-with-john-mauldin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prieur du Plessis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damien Hoffman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor-in-chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial journalist and economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment postcards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamic Republic of Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Howe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Mauldin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Strauss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short annuity insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications network;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to put this  site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/?p=11053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post features an interview with John Mauldin by Damien Hoffman of the very popular Wall St Cheat Sheet blog.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/interview-with-john-mauldin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Census Bureau: Poverty Rising &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/census-bureau-poverty-rising-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/census-bureau-poverty-rising-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyst and portfolio manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antibiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Equity Strategist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirk van Dijk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance coverage;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Namibia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rwanda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24677/Census+Bureau%3A+Poverty+Rising+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Today the Census Bureau released its report on incomes, poverty and health insurance coverage for 2008. Most of it was (not surprisingly) bad news. Here are some of the highlights (lowlights?):
<ul>
    <li>The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that real median household income in the United States fell 3.6 percent between 2007 and 2008, from $52,163 to $50,303.</li>
    <li>The nation&#8217;s official poverty rate in 2008 was 13.2 percent, up from 12.5 percent in 2007. There were 39.8 million people in poverty in 2008, up from 37.3 million in 2007.</li>
    <li>The number of people without health insurance coverage rose from 45.7 million in 2007 to 46.3 million in 2008,</li>
    <li>In 2008, the earnings of women who worked full time, year-round was 77 percent of that for corresponding men, not statistically different from the 2007 ratio.</li>
    <li>The real median earnings of men who worked full time, year-round declined by 1.0 percent between 2007 and 2008, from $46,846 to $46,367. For women, the corresponding drop was 1.9 percent, from $36,451 to $35,745.</li>
    <li>Income inequality was statistically unchanged between 2007 and 2008, as measured by shares of aggregate household income by quintiles and the Gini index. The Gini index was 0.466 in 2008. (The Gini index is a measure of household income inequality; 0 represents perfect income equality and 1 perfect inequality.)</li>
    <li>Between 2007 and 2008, the number of people covered by private health insurance decreased from 202.0 million to 201.0 million, while the number covered by government health insurance climbed from 83.0 million to 87.4 million. The number covered by employment-based health insurance declined from 177.4 million to 176.3 million.</li>
    <li>The number of uninsured children declined from 8.1 million (11.0 percent) in 2007 to 7.3 million (9.9 percent) in 2008.</li>
</ul>
A 3.6% drop in the real median household income is huge. While there were some minor increases in 2004 to 2007, real median incomes are still lower than they were in 2000. Keep the $50,303 number in mind the next time discussions of banker bonuses come up. The poverty rate greatly underestimates the number of people in poverty, but even with the very conservative definition, 13.2% of the population in poverty -- more than one in eight -- is scandalous.
<p>Why do I say that the official poverty rate understates poverty?  Because the formula was set up back in the early 1960&#8217;s and was based on the percentage of income spent on food. Since then, the relative price of food has plummeted, while the cost of other necessities like shelter, health care and education has skyrocketed.</p>
<p>Frankly, I am surprised that the number of uninsured did not rise more than it did, given that most health insurance in the country is tied to employment and unemployment rose significantly over the course of 2008. However, the worst job losses for the year were at the very end.</p>
<p>I would expect that the number of uninsured will jump again in 2009. A big reason that the number of total uninsured did not rise further was the expansion of the S-Chip program for children. Without the drop in uninsured children due to the program, the increase in total uninsured would have been more than twice what it was. "Socialist" medicine, also known as Medicare, Medicaid and the VA, has managed to pick up the slack and provide coverage to those who are losing their private sector coverage.</p>
<p>It was good to see that the Gini index did not increase further -- it is the best single measure out there of income inequality, and the U.S. is already off the charts by developed country standards. With a Gini coefficient of 0.466, the distribution of income in the U.S. far more closely resembles that of China, Mexico and Rwanda than it does that of Canada, the UK or Australia.  Our Gini index is twice that of Sweden, which has the world&#8217;s flattest income distribution. The highest level of inequality in the world is Namibia at 0.707. We are actually closer to Haiti (0.592) than we are to Canada (0.320). To see the international comparisons <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality">check here</a>.</p>
<p>With half the households in the U.S. earning $50,303, it means that half the population can only afford to shop at discounters like <strong>Walmart </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wmt">WMT</a>) or <strong>Family Dollar </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fdo">FDO</a>). They have to spend on staples and necessities, not on discretionary items.</p>
<p>People in the lower half of the income distribution are far less likely to have health insurance coverage. If not provided by the job (low-wage jobs are much less likely to provide insurance than high-income jobs), how are they supposed to buy coverage when the average individual family plan costs $12,000 a year? <br />
<br />
The result is that they will only get health care when they show up at the emergency room, which is a very expensive way to care for people. They also probably wait until they are very sick to seek treatment; thus problems that if caught early could have been solved with an Rx for antibiotics result in hospital stays. The only other option for them is death, and an estimated 20,000 people die each year in this country from easily treatable conditions because they have no health insurance.<br />
<br />
<em><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">With more than 25 years of experience as an analyst and <span class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;">portfolio manager</span>, Dirk van Dijk is Zacks&#8217; Chief Equity Strategist.  He also manages the new long-term investing service, <a>Strategic Investor"&#62;Strategic Investor</a>.</span></em></p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WMT">Read the full analyst report on "WMT"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=FDO">Read the full analyst report on "FDO"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/census-bureau-poverty-rising-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Currencies Hold Their Gains…</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/currencies-hold-their-gains%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/currencies-hold-their-gains%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Fleckenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Galland;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Open Market Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HKD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koruna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLN;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RUB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Post Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p Consumer Borrowing Collapses#8230;What#8217;s up with sterling?            Option ARMs get ready to reset#8230;Gold falls back to below $1,000#8230;And Now#8230; Today#8217;s Pfennig!/p
pGood day#8230; And a Wonderful Wednesday to you! Well#8230; The currencies, for the most part, kept the heat on the dollar throughout the day and in the overnight markets. The euro, did rise to 1.45 and change yesterday, while it is hovering right at that figure this morning, so it did give a little bit back./p
pThere were no big announcements last night like we saw on Monday, so the currencies didn#8217;t have anything to push them further. In fact, there may be a #8220;letting the dust settle#8221; period of time, with the Big Dog, euro, before we see any further advancement,#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/currencies-hold-their-gains%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Would You Respond to an Obama Wealth Tax?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/how-would-you-respond-to-an-obama-wealth-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/how-would-you-respond-to-an-obama-wealth-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Mankiw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starbucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy  Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasury secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth tax systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p style="margin-bottom: 1em;"Pretend, just for a moment, that emyou#8217;re/em President Obama. You have big spending plans – national health insurance, two wars, and a trillion dollar bailout for your friends on Wall Street. Not to mention paying for the soaring costs of Social Security and Medicare. /p
p style="margin-bottom: 1em;"Unfortunately, revenues simply aren#8217;t keeping up./p
p style="margin-bottom: 1em;"Your Treasury Secretary – accused tax-evader Timothy Geithner – tells you that the unfolding recession is starving the country’s government for tax revenue. Indeed, just as you unveiled your trillion-dollar national health plan, Tricky Timmy informed you that federal tax revenues were dropping the fastest since 1932 – at the height of the Great Depression./p
p style="margin-bottom: 1em;"What to do…cut spending? Well, Obama emdid/em challenge his cabinet in April to come up with a whopping US$100#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/how-would-you-respond-to-an-obama-wealth-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leaving Adaptis, Inc. Behind, Clear Choice Health Plans (CCHN.OB) Signs Agreement with the TriZetto Group, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/leaving-adaptis-inc-behind-clear-choice-health-plans-cchn-ob-signs-agreement-with-the-trizetto-group-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/leaving-adaptis-inc-behind-clear-choice-health-plans-cchn-ob-signs-agreement-with-the-trizetto-group-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adaptis Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPO Services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business process services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clear Choice Health Plans Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[configuration services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information ;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance premium billing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patricia Gibford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President and CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The TriZetto Group Inc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=17636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Clear Choice Health Plans, Inc. announced that the company is terminating its business relationship with Adaptis, Inc., its business process outsourcing vendor, following a mutual agreement to stop service. The company also announced that it has started a new five-year contract for BPO services with The TriZetto Group, Inc., an information technology and services [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/leaving-adaptis-inc-behind-clear-choice-health-plans-cchn-ob-signs-agreement-with-the-trizetto-group-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Antidote to Moral Hazard will be Gold</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/the-antidote-to-moral-hazard-will-be-gold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/the-antidote-to-moral-hazard-will-be-gold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Stanczyk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gold Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Stanczyk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false insurance claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas station attendants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phony insurance claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail businesses;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stewart Dougherty;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapidtrends.com/?p=2079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read a mind blowing article.
This is one of the most intense rants I have ever seen. Yet the sad part is the author is not exaggerating.
Hat tip to Stewart Dougherty, this piece is an eye opener.
I have excerpted the best part:
There is accumulating evidence that the Washington – Wall Street moral hazard experiment [...]div class="feedflare"
a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:yIl2AUoC8zA"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:F7zBnMyn0Lo"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?i=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:7Q72WNTAKBA"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:V_sGLiPBpWU"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?i=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:qj6IDK7rITs"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:l6gmwiTKsz0"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:gIN9vFwOqvQ"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?i=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"/img/a
/div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/the-antidote-to-moral-hazard-will-be-gold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DrStockPick.com Stock Report! 8/28/09, MROE, SCOR, RBRM, CBR, OICO, MEMS</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-82809-mroe-scor-rbrm-cbr-oico-mems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-82809-mroe-scor-rbrm-cbr-oico-mems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stock Pick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising  effectiveness products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular telephone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical agent monitoring system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIBER Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS Field Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore Marketing Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daryl McNutt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive vice president and Chief Financial Officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaufman Bros;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Slingerlend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEMS technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEMS;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memsic Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixed signal processing;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monroe Bancorp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O.I. Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peripheral neuropathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Cheesbrough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicians with billing services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president and chief executive officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReBuilder Medical Technologies Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vice president of advertising  effectiveness products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W New York Hotel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.ciber.com/cbr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drstockpick.com/?p=3083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
DrStockPick.com Stock  Report!

Friday August 28, 2009




**************************************************************

Monroe Bancorp  (Nasdaq:MROE) announced that its Board of Directors recently declared a  quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share on the Company&#8217;s Common Stock. The  dividend is payable on Wednesday, September 30, 2009 to shareholders of record  as of Wednesday, September 16, 2009. This dividend is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-82809-mroe-scor-rbrm-cbr-oico-mems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expect Health Care Costs to Rise &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/expect-health-care-costs-to-rise-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/expect-health-care-costs-to-rise-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aon Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aon Corporation;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24031/Expect+Health+Care+Costs+to+Rise+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Cost to employers for health care plans is expected to rise 10.5% within the next 12 months primarily as a result of rising costs, increasing demand for services and an aging population.<br />
<br />
Aon Consulting, the global human capital consulting organization of <strong>Aon Corporation </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aoc">AOC</a>), surveyed about 60 health insurers around the country. The study found that average health care costs are expected to increase 10.5% in the next year, down slightly from last year&#8217;s increase forecast of 10.6%. Costs of prescription drugs are expected to increase 9.3%, slightly lower than the 9.4% trend rate in the prior year. The specialty pharmacy trend rate is 13.2%, up from 12.4% in the prior year.<br />
<br />
For retirees over the age of 65 years, health care rate increases are projected to be 6.6% for Medicare Supplement plans and 7.3% for Medicare Advantage plans, down from 7.3% and 7.7%, respectively, a year ago.<br />
<br />
The expected increase will not necessarily increase the premiums for employees at the same rate. Actual increases for each insurer or plan will depend on many factors, such as plan design, geography and the general health of the people covered, thus, will vary accordingly.<br />
<br />
Some employers may ingest the higher costs because workers had already experienced salary freezes, reductions and layoffs this year. Employers also could deal with rising health care costs by limiting pay increases.<br />
 <br />
Approximately 30% of workers have chronic medical conditions, which account for 65% of the nation's medical expenditure. So there is need for wellness programs and health promotion initiatives to provide a strong platform for effectively managing chronic conditions and preventing future problems. However, there is doubt about how much the individual will make use those programs as behavior change is never easy.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AOC">Read the full analyst report on "AOC"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/expect-health-care-costs-to-rise-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seniors Beware: Deflation Hits Social Security</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/seniors-beware-deflation-hits-social-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/seniors-beware-deflation-hits-social-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pHere’s an interesting credit crisis byproduct: The 50 million current Social Security recipients probably won’t see any extra SS income until 2012. In fact, millions on the government dime might see their monthly checks shrink./p
pIt all boils down to COLA — the government’s cost-of-living adjustment. Since consumer prices are — in theory, at least — deflating, the Social Security administration announced this weekend that they do not plan on a COLA for the next two years. Should that forecast come true, it’ll be the first time that’s happened since at least 1975, when automatic increases were first implemented./p
p style="text-align: center;"/p
pThat will probably equate to a net monthly loss for millions of beneficiaries. Medicare prescription drug premiums are on track to bump up#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/seniors-beware-deflation-hits-social-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lung Cancer Medical Breakthrough (OTC:BMOD)</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/lung-cancer-medical-breakthrough-otcbmod/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/lung-cancer-medical-breakthrough-otcbmod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vlaicu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albuquerque City Attorney’s Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ampex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Montoya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biomoda Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology Associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bladder Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer detection;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cfo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College of Santa Fe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constance Dorian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Secretary and Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Secretary and Director of Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Director of Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive and entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gustave Roussy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance billing codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cousins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John J. Cousins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lab Technician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Alamos National Laboratories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lung Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[member]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Vlaicu;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico Department of Veterans Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optical Society of America and the New Mexico State Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President and a Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President and CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevention for cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public company CFO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego State University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities And Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StocksHaven Investments;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsequent product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New England Journal of Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Zannes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment Of Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verrity Gershin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President of Technical Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wharton School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Health Organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockshaven.com/?p=401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Biomoda, Inc.
(Public, OTC:BMOD)
StocksHaven Investments profiles one of the most promising up and coming small cap biotech companies, Biomoda Inc, which has established a medical breakthrough for early lung cancer detection. It is a development-stage company. The Company is an invitro diagnostics company that develops assays, or tests, to detect cancer. These assays are performed in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/lung-cancer-medical-breakthrough-otcbmod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rationing? I Have to Disagree &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/rationing-i-have-to-disagree-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/rationing-i-have-to-disagree-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Federation of Labor - Congress of Industrial Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British national health service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[czar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excessive health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excessive insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generous health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance premiums;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance exclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high insurance copayments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual health insurance market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Feldstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oecd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiation Therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplemental insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Daschle;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment of a certain type of cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twin Towers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Council;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Health Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/23843/Rationing%3F+I+Have+to+Disagree+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
In yesterday&#8217;s <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, Martin Feldstein, Ronald Reagan&#8217;s top economist and a Harvard professor, claims the current health care proposals are all about rationing.  I have to disagree. <em>Excerpts from his article are below</em>, along with my critique.<br />
<em><br />
"Although administration officials are eager to deny it, rationing health care is central to President Barack Obama's health plan. The Obama strategy is to reduce health costs by rationing the services that we and future generations of patients will receive.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"The White House Council of Economic Advisers issued a report in June explaining the Obama Administration's goal of reducing projected health spending by 30% over the next two decades. That reduction would be achieved by eliminating 'high cost, low-value treatments' by 'implementing a set of performance measures that all providers would adopt' and by 'directly targeting individual providers . . . (and other) high-end outliers.'"</em><br />
<br />
First and foremost, it is important to recognize that the current system already relies on rationing. It uses rationing by price. If you can&#8217;t afford the treatment, or are one of the over 47 million uninsured, tough.<br />
<br />
However, insurance companies like <strong>Aetna</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aet">AET</a>) and <strong>United Health</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/unh">UNH</a>) will also routinely decide that a treatment is not covered because it is too costly. For many conditions, there are several potential treatment alternatives.<br />
<br />
The major health care reform proposals (there are currently 4 on the table, and one more is still being worked on) plan on looking at which methods work best, and eliminating costly treatment options that don&#8217;t work very well (but which might be highly lucrative to the doctor and/or hospital) in favor of lower cost, more effective options. If that be rationing, sign me up.  Sounds like simple &#8220;best practices" to me.<br />
<em><br />
"The president has emphasized the importance of limiting services to 'health care that works.' To identify such care, he provided more than $1 billion in the fiscal stimulus package to jump-start Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and to finance a federal CER advisory council to implement that idea.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"That could morph over time into a cost-control mechanism of the sort proposed by former Sen. Tom Daschle, Mr. Obama's original choice for White House health czar. Comparative effectiveness could become the vehicle for deciding whether each method of treatment provides enough of an improvement in health care to justify its cost."</em><br />
<br />
Could, could, could -- but Marty, you provide absolutely no evidence as to the probability of that occurring. If the CER finds, for example, that radiation therapy is more effective than surgery for the treatment of a certain type of cancer, and that radiation therapy is also 30% less expensive, it seems downright stupid to keep having doctors do a lot of that type of surgery. The surgeons might make less money, but that is not anything like the specter that has been floated of the government denying care to old folks.<br />
<em><br />
"In the British national health service, a government agency approves only those expensive treatments that add at least one Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) per £30,000 (about $49,685) of additional health-care spending. If a treatment costs more per QALY, the health service will not pay for it.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"The existence of such a program in the United States would not only deny lifesaving care, but would also cast a pall over medical researchers who would fear that government experts might reject their discoveries as 'too expensive.'"</em><br />
<br />
There is nothing in any of the proposals that would prevent people from paying extra to get these marginal treatments, either by paying out of pocket or through supplemental insurance. It would not deny lifesaving care, it would simply decline to pay for every procedure, regardless of how expensive or how ineffective.<br />
<br />
It might also focus researchers to look for treatments that bring down costs and are more effective. Those procedures would get a much bigger market share and would be very lucrative.<br />
<br />
<em>"One reason the Obama Administration is prepared to use rationing to limit health care is to rein in the government's exploding health-care budget. Government now pays for nearly half of all health care in the U.S. , primarily through the Medicare and Medicaid programs.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"The White House predicts that the aging of the population and the current trend in health-care spending per beneficiary would cause government outlays for Medicare and Medicaid to rise to 15% of GDP by 2040 from 6% now. Paying those bills without raising taxes would require cutting other existing social spending programs and shelving the administration's plans for new government transfers and spending programs."</em><br />
<br />
Note that government spending is about 20% of GDP now, so it is not just existing social spending programs that would have to be cut, but just about everything. That includes the military. Going on the current trajectory on health care spending has the potential to seriously harm national security.<br />
<br />
<em>"The rising cost of medical treatments would not be such a large burden on future budgets if the government reduced its share in the financing of health services. Raising the existing Medicare and Medicaid deductibles and coinsurance would slow the growth of these programs without resorting to rationing. Physicians and their patients would continue to decide which tests and other services they believe are worth the cost.</em><br />
<em><br />
"There is, of course, no reason why limiting outlays on Medicare and Medicaid requires cutting health services for the rest of the population. The idea that they must be cut in parallel is just an example of misplaced medical egalitarianism."</em><br />
<br />
&#8220;Misplaced medical egalitarianism" -- we are talking life and death here! Every year, 18,000 Americans die prematurely because they lack access to proper medical care. That is more than 6x as many who died when the Twin Towers came down.<br />
<br />
Raising the deductibles and coinsurance for Medicaid? Just who does the good Harvard professor think is on Medicaid? Here is a news flash for ya, Marty -- it's poor people. This would result in rationing of the very worst sort, not you get treatment A instead of treatment B because A is more cost effective, but you get no treatment at all and just suffer or die.<br />
<br />
If Grandma can&#8217;t afford the higher deductable and copayment then what happens? Does the plug get pulled? Does he seriously think that runaway medical cost inflation outside of Medicare and Medicaid is not a problem for the economy, even though costs in those two programs have already been rising slower than overall medical costs?<br />
<br />
<em>"But budget considerations aside, health-economics experts agree that private health spending is too high because our tax rules lead to the wrong kind of insurance. Under existing law, employer payments for health insurance are deductible by the employer but are not included in the taxable income of the employee.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"While an extra $100 paid to someone who earns $45,000 a year will provide only about $60 of after-tax spendable cash, the employer could instead use that $100 to pay $100 of health-insurance premiums for that same individual. It is therefore not surprising that employers and employees have opted for very generous health insurance with very low copayment rates.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"Since a typical 20% copayment rate means that an extra dollar of health services costs the patient only 20 cents at the time of care, patients and their doctors opt for excessive tests and other inappropriately expensive forms of care. The evidence on health-care demand implies that the current tax rules raise private health-care spending by as much as 35%.</em><br />
<em><br />
"The best solution to this problem of private overconsumption of health services would be to eliminate the tax rule that is causing the excessive insurance and the resulting rise in health spending. Alternatively, Congress could strengthen the incentives in the existing law for health savings accounts with high insurance copayments. Either way, the result would be more cost-conscious behavior that would lower health-care spending."</em><br />
<br />
The result would be to push people out of group employer-sponsored plans and into the individual health insurance market. That market is FAR more abusive than the employer group market. That is where people get rejected for pre-existing conditions. That is where people get their health care coverage cancelled on the flimsiest of excuses as soon as they file a serious claim and actually need the insurance.<br />
<br />
While I agree that the self-employed and those who are working for small businesses that don&#8217;t offer health benefits deserve a break, absent something reasonable to replace it, it would be reckless to dismantle the employer sponsored system. Now if you want to argue for scrapping the system and replacing it with a single-payer Medicare for All system, that would make a lot of sense.<br />
<br />
Our current system is not something that anyone designed, but an outgrowth of wage controls during WWII, and is not what anyone starting from scratch would design. It is the system we have in place, and without a replacement it would be dangerous to get rid of it.<br />
<br />
<em>"But unlike reductions in care achieved by government rationing, individuals with different preferences about health and about risk could buy the care that best suits their preferences. While we all want better health, the different choices that people make about such things as smoking, weight and exercise show that there are substantial differences in the priority that different people attach to health.<br />
</em><br />
<em>"Although there has been some talk in Congress about limiting the current health-insurance exclusion, the Administration has not supported the idea. The unions are particularly vehement in their opposition to any reduction in the tax subsidy for health insurance, since they regard their ability to negotiate comprehensive health insurance for their members as a major part of their raison d'être."<br />
</em><br />
Funny, the AFL-CIO has long argued for a single-payer system, one that would completely eliminate that major part of their raison d&#8217;etre. It is not just about your preferences for spending more or less on health care. Demand is the combination of desire for something plus the ability to pay for it. If you are poor, your desire to live and not to suffer counts for nothing in the world that Dr. Feldstein inhabits.<br />
<em><br />
"If changing the tax rule that leads to excessive health insurance is not going to happen, the relevant political choice is between government rationing and continued high levels of health-care spending. Rationing is bad policy. It forces individuals with different preferences to accept the same care.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"It also imposes an arbitrary cap on the future growth of spending instead of letting it evolve in response to changes in technology, tastes and income. In my judgment, rationing would be much worse than excessive care.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"Those who worry about too much health care cite the Congressional Budget Office's prediction that health-care spending could rise to 30% of GDP in 2035 from 16% now. But during that 25-year period, GDP will rise to about $24 trillion from $14 trillion, implying that the GDP not spent on health will rise to $17 billion in 2035 from $12 billion now. So even if nothing else comes along to slow the growth of health spending during the next 25 years, there would still be a nearly 50% rise in income to spend on other things.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"Like virtually every economist I know, I believe the right approach to limiting health spending is by reforming the tax rules. But if that is not going to happen, let's not destroy the high quality of the best of American health care by government rationing and misplaced egalitarianism."</em><br />
<br />
For starters there is a typo in the article, it is to $17 <em>trillion</em>, not billion. Leaving that aside, using his numbers, if we could just keep spending at 16% of GDP (keep in mind the next highest level of spending in the OECD is Switzerland at 11% of GDP, and everyone knows what a hellhole Swiss hospitals are), we are talking about a difference of $3.36 Trillion a year by 2035. That is a lot of money in my book.<br />
<br />
Dr. Feldstein must have an awfully small circle of economists he knows (doubtful) to make that statement. There are few questions in economics that are universally agreed upon, and that is certainly not one of them. Taxing &#8220;platinum plans" might be a useful way to raise some of the revenues needed to help cover the uninsured, but to think just changing the tax code would solve the problem by itself is just plain silly.<br />
 <br />
The high quality of the best of American health care means little if it is only available to a tiny fraction of the population. If a few people ride around in Mercedes and Bentleys and most people have to walk does that mean you have a great transportation system? The claim that America has the best health care system in the world is not one that Dr. Feldstein should be making.<br />
<br />
On every major public health indicator tracked by the World Health organization the U.S. is way down the list, and overall we rank neck and neck with Cuba, and far below places like France, Canada or the U.K. Sometimes when you pay the most, you get the best, other times it just means you are getting ripped off. The latter is clearly the case with the U.S. health care system.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UNH">Read the full analyst report on "UNH"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/rationing-i-have-to-disagree-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Impact of the Genome</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-biotech/the-impact-of-the-genome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-biotech/the-impact-of-the-genome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Von Eschenbach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer Therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer technologies;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francis Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genentech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic  code;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herceptin;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human genome;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical technologies;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Institute of Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Cox;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poseidon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proteomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treating cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pCurrently, medicine is, to a large degree, a “one size fits all” proposition. Doctors watch for adverse effects and check personal and family histories. Medical technologies, however, are designed for the general population, not individuals. That’s going to change./p
pMoreover, strongthere will be huge profit opportunities, in many enabling technologies, for those who invest accordingly./strong And today I’m going to tell you about a company that will hand you your best chance to make a transformational fortune./p
pWe know that many current treatments work on some people, yet not others. Some drugs are safe for many people, but have dangerous side effects for others. This is because all of us have individual differences in our genetic code based on heredity and environment. Even#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-biotech/the-impact-of-the-genome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Security? Not Exactly</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/social-security-not-exactly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/social-security-not-exactly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Casscells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Bixby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comptroller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comptroller general of the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concord Coalition;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAVID WALKER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[official public debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peterson G. Peterson Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President and CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Arnott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Critic’s Choice Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Sundance Film Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victor Fuchs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p class="MsoNormal"The first public retirement pension scheme was created by Otto von Bismarck in 1880 Germany. Fifty years later, during the Great Depression, Franklin Roosevelt followed suit in the United States. As we’ve seen, the number of people expected to reach the retirement age of 65 was not considered to pose a threat to future funding./p
p class="MsoNormal"Life expectancy in 1935, in the United States, for example, was 76.9 for men. Workers relying on the plan for retirement would not receive much each month and were not expected to live long enough to drain the system./p
p class="MsoNormal"When Social Security was founded, the typical US worker at age 65 could expect to live another 11.9 years. But if today’s official projections are right, by the#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/social-security-not-exactly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare: HMOs and Hospitals &#8211; Industry Outlook</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-hmos-and-hospitals-industry-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-hmos-and-hospitals-industry-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amerigroup Corporation;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[for-profit healthcare facilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare industry group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare overhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare policy changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maternal-fetal and pediatric physician services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public operator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Health Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/11754/Healthcare%3A+HMOs+and+Hospitals+-+Industry+Outlook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The healthcare sector is not homogeneous and includes many different industries ranging from managed care organizations, healthcare facilities providers, medical device manufacturers to biotech and pharmaceutical companies. Investors in heath care therefore should remain mindful of the different drivers and appropriate metrics associated with the various sub-sectors.
<p>
That said, and recent market volatility aside, long-term growth of the healthcare sector overall continues to be fuelled by aging of the population and decisions in Congress related to government funding.  Given the ongoing reform debate in Congress, healthcare policy changes remain an important signpost to investing in the sector.
</p><p>
As would be expected in the current backdrop of potentially unfavorable regulatory change, the outlook for many health care industry groups is currently in the `Bad' category. As case in point is the Managed Care Industry (HMOs), whose fortunes are set to be negatively affected by most of the legislative proposals currently on the table for healthcare overhaul.
</p><p>
While there certainly can be good stocks in industries with bad outlooks, our general preference is to avoid such industries altogether. Not every healthcare industry group will be affected equally by the potential changes around the corner, which provides for plenty of investment opportunities in the healthcare space.
</p><p><b>
Opportunities
</b></p><p>
The already favorable earnings outlook for hospital administrators received a further boost from a recent rule change by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services allowing increased rates. Driven by positive earnings revisions, the hospital industry has an attractive Zacks Industry Rank 18, putting it towards the top of the 217 industry groups in our universe.
</p><p>
Particularly well positioned in this space is <b>Universal Health Services (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/UHS">UHS</a>)</b>, the fifth largest for-profit healthcare facilities company in the U.S. This company is also the largest public operator of  behavioral facilities in the country.  This Zacks Rank # 1 company reported better than expected second quarter results this week, with a 36% year-over-year growth in earnings.
</p><p>
Another company well positioned in this space is <b>MEDNAX (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MD">MD</a>)</b>, a leading provider of neonatal, maternal-fetal and pediatric physician services. The company not only produced better-than-expected quarterly results recently, but also provided a favorable outlook.
</p><p><b>
Weaknesses
</b></p><p>
We remain wary of the HMO players given the regulatory/public policy headwinds. Our research shows that even excellent stocks in a bad industry underperform, as they get pulled down by their peers. A case in point is<b> Amerigroup Corporation (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AGP">AGP</a>)</b>, which through its substantial Medicaid-related business remains heavily exposed to budgetary pressures at the state level. 
<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-hmos-and-hospitals-industry-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare: HMOs and Hospitals &#8211; Zacks Analyst Interviews</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-hmos-and-hospitals-zacks-analyst-interviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-hmos-and-hospitals-zacks-analyst-interviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amerigroup Corporation;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[for-profit healthcare facilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare industry group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare overhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare policy changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maternal-fetal and pediatric physician services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public operator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Health Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/11755/Healthcare%3A+HMOs+and+Hospitals+-+Zacks+Analyst+Interviews</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The healthcare sector is not homogeneous and includes many different industries ranging from managed care organizations, healthcare facilities providers, medical device manufacturers to biotech and pharmaceutical companies. Investors in heath care therefore should remain mindful of the different drivers and appropriate metrics associated with the various sub-sectors.
<p>
That said, and recent market volatility aside, long-term growth of the healthcare sector overall continues to be fuelled by aging of the population and decisions in Congress related to government funding.  Given the ongoing reform debate in Congress, healthcare policy changes remain an important signpost to investing in the sector.
</p><p>
As would be expected in the current backdrop of potentially unfavorable regulatory change, the outlook for many health care industry groups is currently in the `Bad' category. As case in point is the Managed Care Industry (HMOs), whose fortunes are set to be negatively affected by most of the legislative proposals currently on the table for healthcare overhaul.
</p><p>
While there certainly can be good stocks in industries with bad outlooks, our general preference is to avoid such industries altogether. Not every healthcare industry group will be affected equally by the potential changes around the corner, which provides for plenty of investment opportunities in the healthcare space.
</p><p><b>
Opportunities
</b></p><p>
The already favorable earnings outlook for hospital administrators received a further boost from a recent rule change by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services allowing increased rates. Driven by positive earnings revisions, the hospital industry has an attractive Zacks Industry Rank 18, putting it towards the top of the 217 industry groups in our universe.
</p><p>
Particularly well positioned in this space is <b>Universal Health Services (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/UHS">UHS</a>)</b>, the fifth largest for-profit healthcare facilities company in the U.S. This company is also the largest public operator of  behavioral facilities in the country.  This Zacks Rank # 1 company reported better than expected second quarter results this week, with a 36% year-over-year growth in earnings.
</p><p>
Another company well positioned in this space is <b>MEDNAX (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MD">MD</a>)</b>, a leading provider of neonatal, maternal-fetal and pediatric physician services. The company not only produced better-than-expected quarterly results recently, but also provided a favorable outlook.
</p><p><b>
Weaknesses
</b></p><p>
We remain wary of the HMO players given the regulatory/public policy headwinds. Our research shows that even excellent stocks in a bad industry underperform, as they get pulled down by their peers. A case in point is<b> Amerigroup Corporation (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AGP">AGP</a>)</b>, which through its substantial Medicaid-related business remains heavily exposed to budgetary pressures at the state level. 
<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-hmos-and-hospitals-zacks-analyst-interviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare: HMOs &amp; Hospitals &#8211; Industry Outlook</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-hmos-hospitals-industry-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-hmos-hospitals-industry-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amerigroup Corporation;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[for-profit healthcare facilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare facilities providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare industry group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare overhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare policy changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maternal-fetal and pediatric physician services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public operator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Health Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/23312/Healthcare%3A+HMOs+%26+Hospitals+-+Industry+Outlook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
The healthcare sector is not homogeneous and includes many different industries ranging from managed care organizations, healthcare facilities providers, medical device manufacturers to biotech and pharmaceutical companies. Investors in heathcare therefore should remain mindful of the different drivers and appropriate metrics associated with the various sub-sectors.<br />
<br />
That said, and recent market volatility aside, long-term growth of the healthcare sector overall continues to be fuelled by aging of the population and decisions in Congress related to government funding.  Given the ongoing reform debate in Congress, healthcare policy changes remain an important signpost to investing in the sector.<br />
<br />
As would be expected in the current backdrop of potentially unfavorable regulatory change, the outlook for many health care industry groups is currently in the &#8216;Bad&#8217; category. As case in point is the Managed Care Industry (HMOs), whose fortunes are set to be negatively affected by most of the legislative proposals currently on the table for healthcare overhaul.<br />
<br />
While there certainly can be good stocks in industries with bad outlooks, our general preference is to avoid such industries altogether. Not every healthcare industry group will be affected equally by the potential changes around the corner, which provides for plenty of investment opportunities in the healthcare space.<br />
<br />
<strong>Opportunities</strong><br />
<br />
The already favorable earnings outlook for hospital administrators received a further boost from a recent rule change by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services allowing increased rates. Driven by positive earnings revisions, the hospital industry has an attractive Zacks Industry Rank 18, putting it towards the top of the 217 industry groups in our universe.<br />
<br />
Particularly well positioned in this space is <strong>Universal Health Services</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/uhs">UHS</a>), the fifth largest for-profit healthcare facilities company in the U.S. This company is also the largest public operator of  behavioral facilities in the country.  This Zacks Rank # 1 company reported better than expected second quarter results this week, with a 36% year-over-year growth in earnings.<br />
<br />
Another company well positioned in this space is <strong>MEDNAX </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/md">MD</a>), a leading provider of neonatal, maternal-fetal and pediatric physician services. The company not only produced better-than-expected quarterly results recently, but also provided a favorable outlook.<br />
<br />
<strong>Weaknesses</strong><br />
<br />
We remain wary of the HMO players given the regulatory/public policy headwinds. Our research shows that even excellent stocks in a bad industry underperform, as they get pulled down by their peers. A case in point is <strong>Amerigroup Corporation</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/agp">AGP</a>), which through its substantial Medicaid-related business remains heavily exposed to budgetary pressures at the state level.<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-hmos-hospitals-industry-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PennyOmega.com Stocks Upgraded, Downgraded and Short Highlights Before the Bell  Thursday August 6, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/pennyomega-com-stocks-upgraded-downgraded-and-short-highlights-before-the-bell-thursday-august-6-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/pennyomega-com-stocks-upgraded-downgraded-and-short-highlights-before-the-bell-thursday-august-6-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PennyOmega.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abercrombie & Fitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology company specializing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband satellite network solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general business update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Hospital Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information Technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hughes Communications Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hughes Network Systems LLC;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idacorp Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho Power Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncothyreon Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PennyOmega.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapeutic Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment Of Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennyomega.com/?p=623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PennyOmega.com Short Highlights Before the Bell!

PennyOmega.com Short Highlights Before The Bell!





PennyOmega.com Stocks Upgraded, Downgraded and Short Highlights Before the Bell Thursday August 6, 2009
**************************************************************
Abercrombie &#38; Fitch (NYSE: ANF) today reported net sales of $236.0 million for the four-week period ended August 1, 2009, a 22% decrease from net sales of $303.1 million for the four-week [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/pennyomega-com-stocks-upgraded-downgraded-and-short-highlights-before-the-bell-thursday-august-6-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conseco Misses by a Penny &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/conseco-misses-by-a-penny-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/conseco-misses-by-a-penny-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company-owned life insurance policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conseco Insurance Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance pool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplement products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/23244/Conseco+Misses+by+a+Penny+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><br />
Conseco, Inc</strong>&#8217;s (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CNO">CNO</a>) second-quarter operating earnings of $0.22 per share were only a penny short of the Zacks Consensus Estimate. Though the results continued to be negatively impacted by the challenging financial markets and realized investment losses, collected premium continued to show accelerated growth especially at Bankers Life and Colonial Penn segments.  However, Conseco Insurance Group's results declined slightly.<br />
 <br />
Net operating income came in at $40.8 million, up 61.9% from $25.2 million in the prior-year quarter. The increase primarily resulted from an 82.9% year-over-year increase in Bankers Life&#8217;s EBIT (income before net realized investment gains, interest and taxes) and 45.7% decrease in Corporate Operations&#8217; loss.<br />
 <br />
In the Bankers Life segment, EBIT increased to $63.3 million from $34.6 million in the prior-year quarter. The results were aided by improved earnings in the long-term care block, increase in earnings from Medicare supplement products and increase in earnings related to the company-owned life insurance policies.<br />
 <br />
The Conseco Insurance Group&#8217;s EBIT was $21.2 million, compared to $32.3 million in the prior-year quarter. Results for the quarter were affected by reduction in earnings from the annuity block, specified disease products margins and long-term care products margins.   <br />
 <br />
Colonial Penn&#8217;s EBIT increased 32.5% year over year to $11.0 million. Second quarter results were primarily affected by the recognition of a $3.0 million final distribution and commutation amount following the termination of a group insurance pool that Colonial Penn previously participated in.<br />
 <br />
Net realized investment losses for the quarter were $13.2 million (net of related amortization and taxes and the establishment of a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets related to such losses) included $36.6 million of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings. These compare favorably with net realized investment losses of $17.4 million (net of related amortization and taxes) in the prior-year quarter.<br />
 <br />
The debt-to-total capital ratio (excluding AOCI) was 26.7% as of Jun 30, 2009, compared to 27.8% as of Dec 31, 2008. Book value (excluding AOCI) as of Jun 30, 2009 was $18.72 per share, compared to $18.41 as of Dec 31, 2008.<br />
 <br />
We remain concerned with the continued weakness in the net results for the past few quarters and anticipate additional losses in the investment portfolio. However, cost-cutting measures are running ahead of management&#8217;s initial targets with expense reductions and the company is focused on maintaining a strong capital position. We think that all the negatives have already been factored into the price.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CNO">Read the full analyst report on "CNO"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/conseco-misses-by-a-penny-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humana Surpasses Expectations &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/humana-surpasses-expectations-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/humana-surpasses-expectations-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/23165/Humana+Surpasses+Expectations+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><br />
Humana</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/hum">HUM</a>) reported earnings of $1.67 per share, beating the Zacks consensus of $1.65 and the Street&#8217;s expectation of $1.64. Results were helped by strong earnings from the Government segment, partially offset by weakness in the Commercial segment.
<p>Total premium and administrative services fees increased 8% from the prior year's quarter due to increases in both average membership and per-member premiums for the company&#8217;s Medicare Advantage products.</p>
<p>The second quarter consolidated benefit ratio improved to 83.3% from 85.0% in the prior-year quarter. This 170 basis-point improvement was primarily driven by improvements of 220 basis points and 20 basis points in the Government and Commercial segment benefit ratios, respectively.</p>
<p>Earnings for Humana's Commercial segment fell 53% to $35.3 million, hurt by lower investment and lower income from its small group business. Commercial membership fell 3% to 3.45 million. Commercial unit premiums rose 1% to $1.87 billion.</p>
<p>Earnings from the Government segment rose 62% to $404.7 million. The increase was brought by lower claim expenses in its Medicare drug plans, a 13% increase in average Medicare Advantage membership and the introduction of member premiums for most of the company's Medicare Advantage products.</p>
<p>Medicare Advantage membership grew to 1,499,800 during the quarter, an increase of 154,800 members -- 12% -- from the prior-year period.</p>
<p>Favorable operating results as well as discharge of debt caused a decline in the debt-to-capitalization ratio to 25.0% from 29.3% last quarter.</p>
<p><em><strong>Guidance  </strong></em></p>
<p>For the third quarter Humana expects earnings in the range of $1.75-1.80 per share, excluding non-recurring items. For full year 2009, the company expects:</p>
<ul>
    <li>EPS of $6.10-6.20 (excluding non-recurring items), versus a Zacks estimate of $1.79</li>
    <li>Revenues of $30.0-32.0 billion</li>
    <li>Revenue of $16.0-16.5 billion for Medicare Advantage; approximately $2.4 billion in revenue for Medicare's stand-alone Prescription Drug Plan (PDPs)</li>
    <li>Revenues of approximately $7.5 billion in the Commercial segment</li>
    <li>An increase of approximately 50,000 from the prior year in Medicare Advantage membership</li>
    <li>Medicare stand-alone PDPs are expected to be down 1.1-1.2 million from the year-ago period</li>
    <li>Investment income of $270 to 290 million</li>
    <li>Medicare benefit ratio of 82.5-83.5%</li>
    <li>Government segment benefit ratio of 83.5-84.5%</li>
</ul>
Though the company has reported favorably given the current economic climate, Humana&#8217;s stock may be increasingly subject to stock price and trading volume volatility.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=HUM">Read the full analyst report on "HUM"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/humana-surpasses-expectations-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s It Worth to Avoid Competition? &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/whats-it-worth-to-avoid-competition-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/whats-it-worth-to-avoid-competition-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/23117/What%27s+It+Worth+to+Avoid+Competition%3F+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
There is an extremely interesting guest post up over al the Baseline Scenario by Anindrajit Dube (<a href="http://baselinescenario.com/2009/07/31/the-value-of-not-having-the-public-plan/">http://baselinescenario.com/2009/07/31/the-value-of-not-having-the-public-plan/</a>) that looks at both the change in the Intrade odds of having a public health care option and the movement in the stock prices of the three biggest health insurance companies, <strong>Cigna</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ci">CI</a>), <strong>United Health Care</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/unh">UNH</a>) and <strong>Aetna</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aet">AET</a>) in response to the Senate Finance committee&#8217;s decision not to include such a plan in its version of Health Care Reform. Clearly the current system of loosely regulated, for-profit, regional oligopolies is to the great benefit of these firms.<br />
<br />
I also think the evidence is pretty clear that it is not to the benefit of the American public. This is not a system designed to maximize the quality of care or hold down costs or reduce conflicts of interest. In most of the country, the combined market share of the top two health insurance companies exceeds 60%, so yes, we do have a system of regional oligopolies.<br />
<br />
But just how much is it worth to them? Well, the market cap of those three companies increased by about $4.5 billion in response to the announcement by the &#8220;Group of Six." At the same time, the betting odds on having a public plan dropped from 45% (somewhat less than a coin flip) to 30% in reaction to the announcement.<br />
<br />
So what would the certainty of no public plan be worth to these companies? Well 1/.15 is 6.67, and 6.67 * $4.5 billion is $30 billion. Put another way, the market is figuring after the announcement that $21 billion of the combined market cap of those three firms is due to the probability that there will be no effective health care reform that holds back their current ways of doing business.<br />
<br />
If it becomes an absolute certainty that there will be no public option, we could thus expect to see their combined market capitalizations rise by $9 billion. Alternatively, if the public option becomes a reality, their market caps would collectively fall by $21 billion. Just as a point of reference, these three firms currently have a market cap of $52.8 billion.<br />
<br />
If you think the public option will die in Congress, you want to buy these companies. If you think that the will of the 70% of the U.S. public (according to Gallup) that favor a public option will be heeded, you want to avoid or short these stocks.<br />
<br />
If, as some claim, that the government can&#8217;t do anything efficiently, then these firms should have nothing to fear from the public option. However, looking at the cost effectiveness of Medicare, the existing socialized single-payer system we have here and at the degree of client satisfaction from surveys, they indeed have a lot to fear. The government option is likely to prove to be very competitive and their market shares will dwindle, and they will have to actually put out a competitive product, something they currently have the luxury of avoiding.<br />
<br />
The stock market is indicating that the public option would be a serious competitor to the health insurance option and would not shrivel away because the government is just a bloated bureaucracy that can&#8217;t do anything right. What else is indicated is that clearly the most profitable investment these firms ever made has been in campaign contributions.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CI">Read the full analyst report on "CI"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UNH">Read the full analyst report on "UNH"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/whats-it-worth-to-avoid-competition-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GDP Down 1.0% &#8211; A Big Improvement &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/gdp-down-1-0-a-big-improvement-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/gdp-down-1-0-a-big-improvement-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software side]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/23102/GDP+Down+1.0%25+-+A+Big+Improvement+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<u><strong>Percent Changes by Major Category</strong></u><br />
<br />
In the second quarter GDP fell at an annual rate of 1.0%, better than consensus expectations of a 1.5% drop (and my own expectation of down about 2.0%). However, the first quarter was revised to a decline of 6.4% from a decline of 5.5%. This was a surprise, since the previous two revisions had been in the direction of a smaller decline.<br />
<br />
<em><strong>Consumption: Negative After Being Positive</strong></em><br />
<br />
The consumer was actually weaker in the second quarter than in the first, with personal consumption expenditures (PCE) falling 1.2% vs. a rise of 0.6% in the first quarter (org. up 1.4%). The swing in goods, particularly durable goods, was large with a decline of 4.0% vs. an increase of 2.5% in the first quarter for all goods and a decline of 7.1% vs. an increase of 3.9% in the first quarter for Durable Goods.<br />
<br />
Non-Durable Goods declined 2.5% vs. an increase of 1.9%. Services, which is the biggest part of PCE, went the other direction with a gain of 0.1% vs. a 0.3% decline in the first quarter. Since PCE is such a huge part of overall GDP, it is surprising to see a very significant deterioration in it coincide with a substantial improvement (less negative) in overall GDP growth.<br />
<br />
<em><strong>Investment: Awful, But Not as Big a Disaster as First Quarter</strong></em><br />
<br />
The main reason for the better performance was that Investment was merely very bad, not the unmitigated disaster that was the first quarter. Total Gross Private Domestic Investment (GPDI) fell &#8220;only" 20.4% vs. a 50.5% decline in the first quarter (org. 48.9%).<br />
<br />
GPDI is split into Residential and Non-Residential as far as fixed (non-inventory) investment is concerned. Fixed investment fell 13.8% following a 39.0% decline in the first quarter. Residential was down 29.3% following a 38.2% decline in the first quarter.<br />
<br />
In the third quarter, that will probably change and we may actually see a small positive. On the Non-Residential (a.k.a. business) side, investment is broken down into Structures and Equipment &#38; Software (E&#38;S). Total business investment was down 8.9% following a 39.2% decline in the first quarter (org. -37.3). Investment in structures declined at only an 8.9% rate following a 43.6% plunge in the first quarter (org -42.9).<br />
<br />
This was much better than I expected, and I suspect it is not sustainable given the massive oversupply of office buildings and stores. Rents and values are falling as vacancies rise. I suspect that we will see a bigger decline in this area in the third quarter. Investment in E&#38;S declined at a 9.0% annualized rate following a 36.4% plunge in the first quarter (org. -33.7%).<br />
<br />
Investment is always the biggest swing factor in the economy, and while under normal circumstances a 20.4% decline in investment would be awful, coming off the 50.5% decline in the first quarter it feels pretty good. Sort of like the difference between smacking yourself in the head with a wiffle ball bat rather than a baseball bat.<br />
<br />
<em><strong>Net Exports: A Smaller Net Positive as Both Fall Less</strong></em><br />
<br />
Net exports were less of a story than they were in the first quarter, but were still a help. Both imports and exports were down, but our imports fell more -- so that is considered a positive for GDP. Imports fell at an annualize rate of 15.1%, much less than the 36.4% decline in the first quarter.<br />
<br />
Given the decline in PCE, it does not look like a lot of that represents just a reflection of lower overall demand rather than people substituting domestic goods for imported ones. Thus we are in a sense exporting our downturn to the rest of the world. Not that it is a one-way street, as our exports fell at 7.0% following a 29.9% decline in the first quarter.<br />
<br />
Still 7.0% is a lot smaller than 15.1%, and it is from a much smaller base than our imports. This is not exactly news, given the massive decline we have seen in the monthly trade deficit numbers. <br />
<br />
<em><strong>Government: Helps Rather Than Hurts, Mostly with Defense</strong></em><br />
<br />
The government was a big help to the economy in the second quarter (one can debate the long-term consequences of that, but for the second quarter it sure helped) with an overall increase of 5.6%. It was mostly the Federal government with a 10.9% increase, and most of that went into Defense with a 13.3% increase.<br />
<br />
Non-Defense federal spending rose by an annualized 6.0% rate. This is a marked turnaround from the first quarter when over all government spending fell 2.6% (org. 3.1%). Within the first quarter, Defense spending fell 5.1% and Non-Defense fell 2.5% in the first quarter. State and Local spending saw a similar if smaller swing, rising 2.4% after a 1.5% fall in the first quarter (org -2.2%).<br />
<br />
The swing, particularly in the S&#38;L and Non-Defense spending is most likely related to the stimulus bill. Spending is still ramping up, so this may provide a bigger boost in the second half of 2009.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, S&#38;L tax collections have been under enormous pressure, and those governments cannot do deficit spending (although there are some games that they can play that allow for, effectively, some S&#38;L deficit spending). Keep in mind that the government figures do not include transfer payments like Social Security or Medicare (they show up in the PCE numbers).  <br />
<br />
<em><strong>Contributions to Growth (or Contraction)</strong></em><br />
<br />
Since not all the elements of GDP are the same size, they don&#8217;t have the same impact on overall GDP growth, thus it is useful to look at the point contribution to the -1.0 overall decline in the second quarter and the -6.4% decline in the first quarter.<br />
<br />
PCE was a big negative swing factor, subtracting 0.88 points (or nearly the entire GDP decline by itself), while in the first quarter PCE offset other parts of the economy, contracting to the tune of 0.44 points. Within PCE, overall goods fell, subtracting 0.92 points split between a 0.52 drag from durable goods and a 0.40 decline due to non-durable goods.<br />
<br />
In the first quarter, goods added 0.56 points to GDP growth, evenly split between 0.28 gains in both durable and non-durable goods. PCE on services was a very small offset, adding 0.04 points in the second quarter after being a 0.13 point drag in the first quarter.<br />
<br />
The smaller drag from GPDI was by far the biggest reason for the sequential improvement, subtracting &#8220;only 2.64" points from growth rather than the 8.98 point drag in the first quarter.<br />
<br />
Inventory investment (liquidation) was a 0.83 point drag on growth (part of the 2.64) which was a much lower drag than the 2.36 point drag in the first quarter. Generally, if GDP is weak, inventory investment is where you would want to see it -- as big changes in inventories have a habit of being reversed in future quarters.<br />
<br />
The subtraction from inventories was almost as big as the subtraction from overall PCE. While the decline in PCE may be welcome from a long-term structural point of view (i.e. moving our economy more in the direction of investment and exports, rather than consumerism) it is also more likely to persist than a decline due to inventories.<br />
<br />
Fixed investment was also still a substantial drag on the economy, subtracting 1.82 points. However, it was a huge improvement over the 6.62 point drag in the first quarter. <br />
<br />
Residential investment (mostly homebuilding) subtracted 0.88 growth points, down from a 1.33 point subtraction in the first quarter. This was the 14th straight quarter in which residential investment subtracted from economic growth. The 0.88 point drag was just slightly less than the 0.97 average drag over the prior 13 quarters.<br />
<br />
However, residential investment is getting to be a smaller and smaller part of overall GDP, and it is not going to go to zero. Looking forward, we might actually see a small positive from this category in the third and fourth quarters.<br />
<br />
Non-Residential Fixed investment was a 0.94 point drag on the economy, but that was a massive improvement over the 5.29 point drag in the first quarter.  Investment in equipment and software subtracted 0.59 of those points. Investment in structures subtracted 0.34 points. On both fronts a massive improvement over the 2.28 point drag from structures and the 3.01 point drag from E&#38;S in the first quarter.<br />
<br />
I suspect that the reduced drag from business investment, particularly in structures is temporary and will be a bigger problem in the third quarter. Unemployment means companies have empty cubicles, so why build more office buildings? There are closed stores all over the place, so why build a new strip mall? Capacity utilization is at a record low by a long shot, so why buy more machinery when the stuff you have is sitting idle?<br />
<br />
The software side of E&#38;S will probably fare better than the equipment side, since often software can be a cost-cutting investment rather than a capacity expansion investment (both can be either, but increased equipment investment is more likely to be about expanding capacity than about cutting costs).<br />
<br />
The contribution from Net Exports was a 1.38 point gain, or offset to declines elsewhere in the economy. This happened as our reduced imports added 2.14 growth points but the fall in exports was a 0.76 point drag to overall growth.<br />
<br />
Both the change in imports and exports were less significant than in the first quarter, when plunging imports was a huge offset to the rest of the economy being weak, adding 6.58 points. Think about that for a moment -- if our imports had not fallen in the first quarter, our economy would have been plunging at an annualized rate of almost 13.0%.<br />
<br />
In the first quarter though, the drop in our exports subtracted 3.95 points, so if we had been able to keep our exports up (and held everything else constant), the first quarter decline would have only been -2.45%. Netting them out, trade helped grow (offset the contraction elsewhere) the economy by 2.63 points in the first quarter. Thus, trade was less of an offset (1.38 point positive) in the second quarter than it was in the first quarter, by 1.25 points.<br />
<br />
Government spending helped boost the economy by 1.12 points, with S&#38;L governments contribution 0.30 points and the federal government adding 0.82 points, of which 0.67 points came from defense spending and only 0.15 points came from non-defense spending.<br />
<br />
In the third and fourth quarters, I would expect a much larger contribution from federal spending, particularly non-defense spending as the stimulus package kicks into high gear. This might be offset by S&#38;L weakness as states are forced to cut back, as California is doing in a rather spectacular way. Most other states face similar, but not as large, problems.  <br />
<br />
Overall though, this is a very impressive improvement. Just a few months ago it looked like we were in a self-sustaining vicious circle of lower demand leading to layoffs and yet further lower demand. Now it looks as if confidence has been restored and the economy is getting its footing.<br />
<br />
The improvement in net exports is probably sustainable, although I would sure like it more if it were based on exports rising more than imports, rather than imports falling more than exports -- the arithmetic is the same for the GDP numbers.<br />
<br />
However, a big part of the improvement in trade in both quarters was lower oil prices. That part is not likely to be repeated. If residential investment is just at 0.0% in the third quarter, it will be a big help to the overall GDP numbers.<br />
<br />
Inventories are likely to swing from being a drag on growth to being a positive for growth, and possibly a very significant one. One area to watch will be the rebuilding of auto inventories. Increases in production at <strong>Ford</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/f">F</a>), <strong>Toyota </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/tm">TM</a>) and <strong>Honda</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/hmc">HMC</a>) as well as at still-non-Big-Board-traded GM and Chrysler are likely to add to growth. The "Cash for Clunkers" was a big success in clearing the lots (so much so it ran out of money almost immediately, but is likely to get reloaded).<br />
<br />
Not that I am expecting auto sales to return to the levels of a few years ago anytime soon, but going from an annual sales rate of just over 9 million a year to 12 million a year is a substantial percentage increase, swinging from being a negative to being a positive for growth.<br />
<br />
These are the signs one generally sees in the early stages of an economic recovery. I still think it is going to be a weak recovery and not enough to bring down unemployment anytime soon. To get unemployment to fall, we need to generate growth of about 2.0%.<br />
<br />
However, one can see a path towards an actual positive print on GDP growth in the third quarter. I&#8217;m not sure if it will happen, or if we have to wait until the fourth quarter to get that positive number (I think the drag from non-residential fixed investment, particularly in structures, could slip to being a bigger negative in the second half). Then again, it is a very real possibility.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=F">Read the full analyst report on "F"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=TM">Read the full analyst report on "TM"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=HMC">Read the full analyst report on "HMC"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/gdp-down-1-0-a-big-improvement-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Bull and Bear of the Day Highlights: NTT DoCoMo, Altria Group, United Health Care, Aetna and Humana &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-bull-and-bear-of-the-day-highlights-ntt-docomo-altria-group-united-health-care-aetna-and-humana-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-bull-and-bear-of-the-day-highlights-ntt-docomo-altria-group-united-health-care-aetna-and-humana-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G HSDPA technologies;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Altria Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance industry;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[important tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moist smokeless tobacco manufacturer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTT DoCoMo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on-line money transfer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Equity Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/22926/Zacks+Bull+and+Bear+of+the+Day+Highlights%3A+NTT+DoCoMo%2C+Altria+Group%2C+United+Health+Care%2C+Aetna+and+Humana+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><strong>For Immediate Release</strong></p>
<p align="left">Chicago, IL &#8211; July 29, 2009 &#8211; Zacks Equity Research highlights <strong>NTT DoCoMo </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/DCM">DCM</a>) as the Bull of the Day and <strong>Altria Group </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MO">MO</a>) the Bear of the Day. In addition, Zacks Equity Research provides analysis on <strong>United Health Care </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/UNH">UNH</a>), <strong>Aetna </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AET">AET</a>) and <strong>Humana </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/HUM">HUM</a>).</p>
<p align="left">Full analysis of all these stocks is available at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=2676">http://at.zacks.com/?id=2676</a></p>
<p align="left">Here is a synopsis of all five stocks:</p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/newsroom/commentary/index.php?type_id=6">Bull of the Day</a>:</p>
<p align="left">We maintain our Buy recommendation and the same valuation target for <strong>NTT DoCoMo </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/DCM">DCM</a>), the largest mobile service provider in Japan, ahead of first quarter of fiscal 2010 financial results. The company currently maintains a leading 50% share of the Japanese wireless market.</p>
<p align="left">DCM upgraded 98% of its total coverage area with 3G HSDPA technologies and emerging 4G LTE networks are planned for deployment through 2010. DCM's decisions to focus on mobile content along with a renewed geographic expansion drive outside Japan are positive indicators.</p>
<p align="left">Furthermore, the company is launching an innovative on-line money transfer service. We consider DCM as an attractive long-term investment opportunity.</p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/newsroom/commentary/index.php?type_id=7">Bear of the Day</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><strong>Altria Group </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MO">MO</a>) is the leading domestic tobacco company, which generates significant cash flow and the stock has a high dividend yield. In an effort to expand into adjacent categories, Altria acquired UST, the world's leading moist smokeless tobacco manufacturer.</p>
<p align="left">However, the company is engaged in numerous tobacco liability suits. Several large punitive damage awards have been upheld, most recently the $79.5 million judgment in the Williams case in 2009.</p>
<p align="left">In addition, the 150+% federal excise tax increase should dramatically reduce cigarette volume. A Sell rating is recommended.</p>
<p align="left">Latest Posts on the Zacks <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/AnalystBlog">Analyst Blog</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><em>&#8220;Blue-Dogging" Health Care</em></p>
<p align="left">Probably the most important tool on the table for controlling health care costs is the public option. Essentially, it will let individuals buy into Medicare early. Medicare is a FAR more efficient system than the private health insurance system. For each dollar that is spent on Medicare, more than 98 cents goes to paying for actual medical costs.</p>
<p align="left">At the major health insurance companies like <strong>United Health Care </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/UNH">UNH</a>), <strong>Aetna </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AET">AET</a>) and <strong>Humana </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/HUM">HUM</a>), less than 80% goes to pay for doctors and hospitals. The rest of the money goes to overhead -- principally trying to get lots of people to apply for health care coverage and then to weed out the ones that are more likely to get sick. These companies also spend a lot of money on trying to figure out if someone had an undisclosed pre-existing condition, so they can deny coverage to people who thought they were insured when they actually get sick and file a claim.</p>
<p align="left">The health insurance industry is rightly afraid of the public option, because it is a much better mousetrap and will eventually lead to the industry having a much smaller, supplemental role (equivalent to the current medigap policies offered to supplement Medicare) rather than being a huge industry.</p>
<p align="left">Get the full analysis of all these stocks by going to <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5507">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5507</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About the Bull and Bear of the Day</strong></p>
<p align="left">Every day, the analysts at Zacks Equity Research select two stocks that are likely to outperform (Bull) or underperform (Bear) the markets over the next 3-6 months.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About the Analyst Blog</strong></p>
<p align="left">Updated throughout every trading day, the <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/AnalystBlog">Analyst Blog</a> provides analysis from Zacks Equity Research about the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks Equity Research</strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.</p>
<p align="left">Continuous analyst coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.</p>
<p align="left">Zacks <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5508">"Profit from the Pros"</a> e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today by visiting <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5508">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5508</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks </strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of <a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/">Zacks Investment Research</a>, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the <a href="http://www.zacks.com/rank/index.php">Zacks Rank</a>, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5509">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5509</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.</p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/zacksresearch">http://twitter.com/zacksresearch</a></p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a></p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.</p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />
Mark Vickery<br />
Web Content Editor<br />
312-265-9380<br />
Visit: <a href="www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a></p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left"> </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-bull-and-bear-of-the-day-highlights-ntt-docomo-altria-group-united-health-care-aetna-and-humana-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Torchmark Beats, Downs Guidance &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/torchmark-beats-downs-guidance-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/torchmark-beats-downs-guidance-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Income Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general corporate purposes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance subsidiaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance underwriting margin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln National Corp.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNL Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principal Financial Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/22902/Torchmark+Beats%2C+Downs+Guidance+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<strong><em>Torchmark surpasses expectations but lowers guidance</em><br />
<br />
Torchmark Corporation&#8217;s </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/tmk">TMK</a>) second quarter operating earnings of $1.53 per share were 3 pennies ahead of both our expectation as well as the Street. This compares to operating earnings of $1.44 per share in the year-ago quarter. Results reflected strong growth in life sales, though health sales were significantly down in the quarter.<br />
<br />
However, the company has reduced its guidance for the full fiscal year 2009. The company now expects its net operating income per share in the range of $5.93 to $6.08, assuming no share repurchases. The previous guidance was $6.00-6.15 per share.<br />
<br />
Torchmark reported its second quarter earnings after market close on July 27. For the quarter, the company reported net income was $1.38 per share compared with $1.47 per share for the year-ago quarter.<br />
<br />
Life sales were strong in the quarter, primarily driven by the growth in its distribution channels: American Income Agency and Direct Response. Net sales of life insurance increased 12% year-over-year. Life insurance accounted for 70% of the company's insurance underwriting margin for the quarter and 62% of total premium revenue.<br />
<br />
However, Health sales were significantly down in the quarter. The company has experienced a drop in its LNL Agency. Health sales, excluding Medicare Part D, fell 48% year-over-year.<br />
<br />
We remain concerned about Torchmark&#8217;s investment portfolio, which has experienced a substantial increase in below-investment-grade bonds of late. Below-investment-grade bonds, at amortized cost, were $1.4 billion, or 15% of fixed maturities, compared to $1.3 billion, or 13% at March 31, 2009, reflecting rating agency downgrades of bonds that were previously investment grade.<br />
<br />
Also, we note that the company has experienced investment impairments of $38.1 in the quarter. Going forward, if the investment portfolio experiences substantial increase in impairments or ratings downgrades within its fixed income category, the risk-adjusted capital of the company may be threatened.<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, with improvement in the capital markets, the company has witnessed a drop in unrealized losses. At the end of the second quarter, Torchmark had $1.4 billion of net unrealized losses compared to $2.2 billion at March 31, 2009. This has resulted in an increase in book value.<br />
<br />
In June, Torchmark announced an offering of $300 million in 9.25% senior notes that will mature in 2019. Net proceeds from this debt issuance will be used to repay its $100 million of senior debentures that mature in August 2009, while the rest will be used for general corporate purposes.<br />
<br />
This move is encouraging to us as the debt issuance coupled with its strong operating performances and the recent discontinuation of the share repurchase program will add to its statutory capital levels at its insurance subsidiaries. Recently, <strong>Principal Financial Group </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/pfg">PFG</a>) and <strong>Lincoln National Corp </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/lnc">LNC</a>) have also resorted to such public offerings to bolster their risk-based capital levels.<br />
<br />
Given the company&#8217;s current share price level, we have retained our Hold rating on the shares of Torchmark, as we do not see enough near-term upside catalysts to support a broadening of TMK&#8217;s price-to-book multiple at this time.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=TMK">Read the full analyst report on "TMK"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=PFG">Read the full analyst report on "PFG"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=LNC">Read the full analyst report on "LNC"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/torchmark-beats-downs-guidance-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Blue-Dogging&#8221; Health Care &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/blue-dogging-health-care-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/blue-dogging-health-care-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Dog leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Member]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance coverage;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance industry;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance stocks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[important tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public insurance option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/22903/%22Blue-Dogging%22+Health+Care+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
One of the traits that people prize most in dogs is loyalty. However, the question then becomes loyalty to whom or what?<br />
<br />
In the case of the "Blue Dog Caucus," the group of Congressional Democrats that has emerged as the major player in health care reform, it appears that its loyalty is first and foremost to its big campaign contributors -- the health insurance firms and the drug companies. The general claim that they make is that they are worried about the fiscal consequences of health care reform, but when it comes to specifics, they are most opposed to the very elements of the reform package that are most likely to be successful in driving down the overall cost.<br />
<br />
It is easy to figure out why the GOP is united in opposition to the primary plans being debated in Congress. (Some members of the GOP have proposed an alternate plan, but, overall, the party&#8217;s bottom line on the plans currently being considered by the Democrats is NO.) The GOP hopes that if the plan fails, so will the Obama presidency. Sen. Jim DeMint of S.C. pretty much came out and said so ("It will be his Waterloo").<br />
<br />
What the Blue Dogs are up to is harder to figure out. The main answer I come up with is the campaign contributions. For example, Mike Ross (D-AR), who has emerged as the Blue Dog leader on health care, got more than twice as much campaign money from health care professionals as any other source in the 2008 election campaign. Above all, dogs are loyal.<br />
<br />
Probably the most important tool on the table for controlling health care costs is the public option. Essentially, it will let individuals buy into Medicare early. Medicare is a FAR more efficient system than the private health insurance system. For each dollar that is spent on Medicare, more than 98 cents goes to paying for actual medical costs.<br />
<br />
At the major health insurance companies like <strong>United Health Care</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/unh">UNH</a>), <strong>Aetna</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aet">AET</a>) and <strong>Humana</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/hum">HUM</a>), less than 80% goes to pay for doctors and hospitals. The rest of the money goes to overhead -- principally trying to get lots of people to apply for health care coverage and then to weed out the ones that are more likely to get sick. These companies also spend a lot of money on trying to figure out if someone had an undisclosed pre-existing condition, so they can deny coverage to people who thought they were insured when they actually get sick and file a claim.<br />
<br />
The health insurance industry is rightly afraid of the public option, because it is a much better mousetrap and will eventually lead to the industry having a much smaller, supplemental role (equivalent to the current medigap policies offered to supplement Medicare) rather than being a huge industry.<br />
<br />
The Blue Dogs also want the public plan, and/or Medicare to increase the payment schedules for doctors and hospitals in rural areas. That is hardly a recipe for holding down costs, even if it does help solve the problem of not enough doctors in some areas. <br />
<br />
Congress has large Democratic majorities in both houses, so ultimately if health care reform does not come about, it will be their fault, and I suspect that the voters will punish them for it. The current path we are on is not sustainable. If nothing is done, more and more people will lose their access to health insurance. In 2007, 46 million Americans were without health insurance coverage.<br />
<br />
Since health insurance is largely tied to employment in this country (until retirement), it is highly likely that the number of uninsured right now is well north of 50 million U.S. citizens, given the number of jobs lost over the last 18 months. That is one in six Americans. If one considers that everyone over the age of 65 is already covered (in a "socialized single payer system," by the way), it is more like one in five people in this country has no health insurance.<br />
<br />
That does not count the huge number of people who are woefully underinsured. The current system also affects those lucky enough to have good insurance.  We will never know for sure how many people would like to strike out on their own and form their own companies, but they (or a family member) have a pre-existing medical condition. For them to quit work and start their own firm could be financial suicide, since they would most likely have to do without health insurance, or the premiums would be so high as to be unaffordable.<br />
<br />
As the graph below shows (from <a href="http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/us-health-spending-breaks-from-the-pack/">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/us-health-spending-breaks-from-the-pack/</a>), the U.S. spends far more than any other advanced country in the world on health care as a percentage of GDP, and while it has been going up in most countries, it has been going up much faster here. Considering that we have a much higher GDP per capita than most of the other countries on the graph, our absolute spending on health care dwarfs that of other countries. Yet on every major measure of health care outcomes, such as life expectance or infant mortality, the U.S. ranks mediocre at best.<br />
<br />
The projections are that if nothing is done, by 2025, we will be spending 25% of our GDP on health care. The last effort at health care reform in 1993 failed, but the political pressure and the movement of people into HMOs was able to slow the growth as a percentage of GDP for awhile. A rapidly growing GDP in the also helped in that regard.<br />
<br />
However, then the health care spending cancer came out of its temporary remission, and started to soar again. The graph only goes through 2007, but it is likely that with the shrinking of the overall economy, health care's share has soared again.<br />
<br />
The bottom line is that we need a strong public insurance option, one that will have the clout to figure out which treatments work best and to promote preventative care. Without it, the country is on the road to bankruptcy. The gap between what we pay and what the rest of the world pays for health care is sapping the country&#8217;s competitiveness and, yes, even preventing entrepreneurship. One can understand, but lament the political games being played by the GOP, but one must seriously wonder about what the Blue Dogs hope to accomplish.<br />
<br />
If the health care package goes down to defeat, or is so watered down as to be reform in name only (a very likely outcome at this point) health insurance stocks will soar, and the drug companies will be very attractive. Both have been beaten down to value levels on fears that their oligopolies will be broken up and they will no longer be able to suck the life out of the economy.  With a failure or an effective failure of health care reform, these companies will do very well, but the country will be in terminal condition.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1248806568.jpg" alt="" /><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UNH">Read the full analyst report on "UNH"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=HUM">Read the full analyst report on "HUM"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/blue-dogging-health-care-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Omnicell Quarter Disappoints &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/omnicell-quarter-disappoints-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/omnicell-quarter-disappoints-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmeriSourceBergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automation solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baxter International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardinal Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information Technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McKesson Corporation;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omnicell Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply automation systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/22785/Omnicell+Quarter+Disappoints+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <br />
<strong>Omnicell, Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/omcl">OMCL</a>) reported poor results for the second quarter of 2009. GAAP-diluted EPS was $0.03, compared to $0.08 in the year-ago quarter. Excluding stock-based compensation expenses, non-GAAP EPS was $0.10, compared to $0.17 in the year-ago quarter.<br />
<br />
Net revenue for the quarter was $52.6 million, a decline of roughly 17% year over year.  Product revenue declined roughly 21% year over year to approximately $42 million.<br />
<br />
We believe that the decline can be attributed to the present economic turbulence that has resulted in a lower number of medication and supply automation systems installed. Services and other revenue increased roughly 2% year over year to $10.6 million.<br />
<br />
Gross margin was roughly flat year over year at approximately 51.2%. Both research and development (R&#38;D) and selling, general and administrative (SG&#38;A) expenses increased as a percentage of total sales due to lower revenue. Higher operating expenses as a percentage of total sales led to a decline in operating and net margins, with both declining 460 basis points and 260 basis points to 2.5% and 1.7%, respectively.<br />
<br />
At the end of the quarter, the company had a cash balance of roughly $126.4 million with no debt. The working capital of the company stands strong at $176.7 million -- roughly 70% of fiscal 2008 revenue.<br />
<br />
Omnicell is likely to benefit from the U.S. Government's approval of more than $20 billion in spending on health-information technology. The majority of the spending will be felt between 2011 and 2015. Starting in 2011, physicians who use electronic records will be eligible for more than $40,000 in Medicare incentive payments.  Payments will be made over several years.<br />
<br />
Omnicell is a leading provider of systems and software solutions that develops end-to-end automation solutions for the medication-use process. Omnicell competes with larger companies, such as Pyxis, a division of <strong>Cardinal Health</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cah">CAH</a>); McKesson Automation, a division of <strong>McKesson Corporation</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mck">MCK</a>); <strong>Cerner</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cern">CERN</a>); <strong>AmerisourceBergen</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/abc">ABC</a>); and the Baxter Medical Delivery business of <strong>Baxter International </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/bax">BAX</a>). <br />
<br />
In the near-term, we believe purchases of Omnicell products and services will be delayed as hospitals and nursing homes grapple with weak credit markets, rising expenses, higher unemployment and erosion of wealth. However, as the dust settles, we believe that the company will likely benefit in the long-term. As such, we continue to rate Omnicell a Hold.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=OMCL">Read the full analyst report on "OMCL"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CAH">Read the full analyst report on "CAH"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MCK">Read the full analyst report on "MCK"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CERN">Read the full analyst report on "CERN"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=ABC">Read the full analyst report on "ABC"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BAX">Read the full analyst report on "BAX"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/omnicell-quarter-disappoints-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Cerner Corporation, Quality Systems Inc., MedAssets Inc. and Zions Bancorporation &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-allscripts-misys-healthcare-solutions-cerner-corporation-quality-systems-inc-medassets-inc-and-zions-bancorporation-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-allscripts-misys-healthcare-solutions-cerner-corporation-quality-systems-inc-medassets-inc-and-zions-bancorporation-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cerner Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MedAssets Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Systems Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zions Bancorporation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/22558/Zacks+Analyst+Blog+Highlights%3A+Allscripts-Misys+Healthcare+Solutions%2C+Cerner+Corporation%2C+Quality+Systems+Inc.%2C+MedAssets+Inc.+and+Zions+Bancorporation+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><strong>For Immediate Release</strong></p>
<p align="left">Chicago, IL &#8211; July 22, 2009 &#8211; Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: <strong>Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions </strong>(<a href="void(0)">MDRX</a>), <strong>Cerner Corporation </strong>(<a href="void(0)">CERN</a>), <strong>Quality Systems Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">QSII</a>), <strong>MedAssets Inc. </strong>(<a href="void(0)">MDAS</a>) and <strong>Zions Bancorporation </strong>(<a href="void(0)">ZION</a>).</p>
<p align="left">Get the most recent insight from Zacks Equity Research with the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513</a></p>
<p align="left">Here are highlights from Tuesday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/AnalystBlog">Analyst Blog</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><strong>AllScripts Posts Strong Q4 &#38; FY</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions </strong>(<a href="void(0)">MDRX</a>) reported fourth quarter and full fiscal year 2009 results. Both Non-GAAP EPS and revenue for the quarter exceeded the Street&#8217;s expectations.</p>
<p align="left">Non-GAAP EPS was $0.16, above the $0.15 expected by the Street. Total revenue for the quarter was $166.2 million, compared to the Street&#8217;s expectations of $160.5 million.</p>
<p align="left">Allscripts is likely to benefit most from the recent Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (H.R. 6331) passed by the U.S. Congress. The Act, for the first time ever, provides financial incentives to physicians who adopt electronic prescribing (ePrescribing), requires adoption by 2011, and delays any reduction in fees for treating Medicare patients.</p>
<p align="left">Allscripts faces strong competition from <strong>Cerner Corporation </strong>(<a href="void(0)">CERN</a>), <strong>Quality Systems Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">QSII</a>) and <strong>MedAssets Inc. </strong>(<a href="void(0)">MDAS</a>). Based on the company&#8217;s performance in the fourth quarter and full year, we reiterate our Hold rating on Allscripts.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>ZION&#8217;s Q2 Shows Mixed Results</strong></p>
<p align="left">On July 20, 2009, <strong>Zions Bancorporation </strong>(<a href="void(0)">ZION</a>) reported the second quarter of 2009 financial results. Adjusted loss for the quarter came in at $0.04 per diluted share, substantially ahead of our estimates and consensus.</p>
<p align="left">Net loss for the quarter came in at $40.7 million or $0.35 per share, largely driven by impairment losses on investment securities of $42.0 million and valuation losses due to write-downs of impaired securities of $11.7 million. The loss was also caused by significantly higher provisions for loan losses. Excluding impairment losses and valuation losses on investment securities, operating loss came in at $4.7 million or $0.04 per diluted share, compared to the loss of $44.9 million or $0.39 per diluted share in the prior quarter, and adjusted net income of $70.0 million or $0.66 per diluted share in the prior-year quarter.</p>
<p align="left">Want more from Zacks Equity Research? Subscribe to the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks Equity Research</strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.</p>
<p align="left">Continuous coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.</p>
<p align="left">Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517</a></p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks </strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.</p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/zacksresearch">http://twitter.com/zacksresearch</a></p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a></p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.</p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />
Mark Vickery<br />
Web Content Editor<br />
312-265-9380<br />
Visit: <a href="www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a></p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left"> </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-allscripts-misys-healthcare-solutions-cerner-corporation-quality-systems-inc-medassets-inc-and-zions-bancorporation-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for an exit</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/looking-for-an-exit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/looking-for-an-exit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hamilton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Paper Lending Facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fdic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy tool;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recipient bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/07/looking_for_an.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In addition to <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/07/21/humphrey-hawkins-in-real-time-bernanke-faces-house-lawmakers/">testifying before Congress</a>, Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke today tried to explain the Fed's plans and options directly to the public through an <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203946904574300050657897992.html">op-ed in the Wall Street Journal</a>. Here I provide some background on what Bernanke's talking about in terms of an "exit strategy" for the Fed, and offer some thoughts on his remarks.</p>

<p>The basic power of the Fed derives from its ability to create money, which it can use to buy assets or extend loans.  We can summarize the Fed's actions in terms of either the asset side of its balance sheet (the assets and loans it holds), or the liabilities side (the money or other obligations it has created).  Let's start with the asset side.  Up until January of 2008, by far the most important assets held by the Fed were short-term Treasury bills.  As last year wore on, the Fed significantly expanded its loans in the form of currency swaps with foreign central banks, direct lending to U.S. banks through term auction credit, and the Commercial Paper Lending Facility.  Altogether such measures more than doubled the various asset holdings of the Fed by the end of the year, despite the fact that the Fed sold off 40% of its original T-bills.</p>

<br />

<table>
<caption align="bottom"> <h6>
<b>Figure 1. Factors supplying reserve funds, in billions of dollars, seasonally unadjusted, from Jan 1, 2007 to July 15, 2009.</b> Wednesday values, from <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/">Federal Reserve H41 release</a>.  
Agency: federal agency debt securities held outright; 
swaps: central bank liquidity swaps; 
Maiden 1: net portfolio holdings of Maiden Lane LLC;
MMIFL: net portfolio holdings of LLCs funded through
    the Money Market Investor Funding Facility;
MBS: mortgage-backed securities held outright;
CPLF: net portfolio holdings of LLCs funded through the Commercial Paper Funding Facility;
TALF: loans extended through Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility;
AIG: sum of credit extended to American International Group, Inc. plus net portfolio holdings of Maiden Lane II and III; 
ABCP: loans extended to Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility;
PDCF: loans extended to primary dealer and other broker-dealer credit;
discount: sum of primary credit, secondary credit, and seasonal credit;
TAC: term auction credit;
RP: repurchase agreements;
misc: sum of float, gold stock, special drawing rights certificate account, and Treasury currency outstanding;
other FR: Other Federal Reserve assets;
treasuries: U.S. Treasury securities held outright.
</h6></caption>
<tr><td><img alt="fed_asset_07_21.gif" src="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/07/fed_asset_07_21.gif"/></td></tr></table>
<br />


<p>In 2009, the Fed has been winding down some of these programs, with significant declines in swaps, CPLF, and TAC, replaced by big increases in items such as mortgage-backed securities and agency debt.  The changes over the last few months should not by any stretch be described as a return to "plain vanilla" central banking.  The risk on MBS and agencies is greater than that for T-bills, and the asset level today remains 130% above its value at the start of 2007.</p>

<p>Where did the Fed obtain the funds with which it acquired all these new assets?  To say that it did so by "printing money" would be inaccurate. The Fed doesn't lend a half trillion in term auction credit by handing out big bundles of green paper with Ben Franklin's picture on them.  Instead, it creates an entry in an account that the recipient bank has with the Fed known as the bank's Federal Reserve deposits.  The bank could, if it wanted, use those credits to ask the Fed for those Ben Franklin souvenirs.  Instead the bank presumably used the new deposits to pay for some obligations or make some loans, either of which it would instruct the Fed to implement by transferring those reserves to some other bank.  That bank in turn could use the reserves to ask for C-notes, or pass them on to somebody else through its own loans or any other expenditures.</p>

<p>And the buck stops-- where?  In normal times, the process of banks putting any excess reserves to use would continue until there's enough expansion of banking and economic activity that ultimate recipients did want to turn those reserves into green currency.  And once that happens, it would not be a misleading summary of the bottom line to say that the Fed eventually paid for its original asset purchase by "printing money".</p>

<p> But in the fall of 2008, the Fed did not want that to happen.  It wanted to extend a trillion in new loans, but it did not want to see currency held by the public go up by a trillion dollars, out of fear the latter would be very inflationary.  The Fed's thinking was that we didn't need a traditional inflationary expansion of credit, but instead needed to allocate credit to particular functions without having conventional measures of the money supply swell.</p>

<p>The graph below describes how the Fed did that, looking now at the liabilities side of the Fed's balance sheet.  The height of Figure 2 at any date is identical, by definition, to the height of Figure 1, but whereas Figure 1 was looking at what the Fed did with its funds, Figure 2 summarizes how the Fed obtained those funds.  In other words, Figure 2 looks at where the reserve deposits the Fed created ended up, and explains why the dramatic actions of Figure 1 haven't yet shown up as currency held by the public.</p>

<br />

<table>
<caption align="bottom"> <h6>
<b> Figure 2. Factors absorbing reserve funds, in billions of dollars, seasonally unadjusted, from Jan 1, 2007 to July 15, 2009.</b> Wednesday values, from <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/">Federal Reserve H41 release</a>.  Treasury: sum of U.S. Treasury general and supplementary funding accounts; reserves: reserve balances with Federal Reserve Banks; misc: sum of Treasury cash holdings, foreign official accounts, and other deposits; other: other liabilities and capital; service: sum of required clearing balance and adjustments to compensate for float; reverse RP: reverse repurchase agreements; Currency: currency in circulation.
</h6></caption>
<tr><td><img alt="fed_liab_07_21.gif" src="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/07/fed_liab_07_21.gif"/></td></tr></table>
<br />


<p>One big factor has been the accounts that the U.S. Treasury holds with the Fed.  Essentially, the Fed asked the Treasury to borrow some money through public auctions, which it did.  Banks paid for these new T-bills by instructing the Fed to transfer to the Treasury the Federal Reserve deposits that they'd received from the Fed as a result of the programs in Figure 1.  The Treasury then just left the funds sitting there in its accounts with the Fed.  In effect, the Fed obtained the funds for some of its actions on the asset side not by "printing money" but instead by having the Treasury borrow funds on its behalf on the liabilities side.</p>

<p>However, an even bigger volume of the deposits that the Fed created are still just sitting on the banks' books.  The way the fed funds market functioned in 2007, that would never have happened.  Why close your bank's books for the day with funds just sitting there in an account with the Fed, earning no interest, when you could loan them out overnight instead?  A big bank would never do such a thing in 2007. But they're happy to do so in 2009, in part because the overnight lending opportunities are not particularly attractive at the moment, and in part because the Fed now pays interest on those reserves.  From the bank's point of view, funds left on deposit with the Fed at the end of the day aren't idle at all, under the new system adopted in the fall of 2008.</p>

<p>One of the points that Bernanke makes in <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203946904574300050657897992.html">his op-ed</a> is that the Fed could continue to use this device, if need be, to prevent essentially any volume of its asset side activity from showing up as an increase in currency held by the public, simply by raising the interest rate the Fed offers to pay on reserves to whatever level is necessary to persuade banks to continue to hold these funds idle overnight.  In effect, the Fed is through this device borrowing directly from the public to fund its asset-side activities rather than by "printing money".</p>

<p>Should that allay any inflationary concerns people may have about the doubling in the size of the Fed's balance sheet?  In a narrow mechanical sense, perhaps.  It is true that the new assets have not yet shown up as an increase in the money supply, and it is true that the Fed has the power to prevent them from doing so in the future.  But my concerns about inflation are not that the Fed would lose the ability to target a particular level for the money supply, and certainly are not concerns about the next six months, where I still see deflation as a bigger worry than inflation.  Instead, my concern is that the <a href="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/07/offbalancesheet.html">current fiscal trajectory</a> is fundamentally inconsistent with the Federal Reserve choosing to keep inflation under control.  Both devices, ballooning of the Treasury's account with the Fed and enabling the Fed in effect to borrow directly on its own, are indeed as much fiscal measures as they are monetary.  But to someone worried about the <a href="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/07/concerns_about_1.html"> increasing co-mingling of monetary and fiscal policy</a>, that blurring of the lines is not a reassuring development.</p>

<p>My specific worry is that we will eventually face a crisis of confidence in the Treasury and the dollar itself.  It is true, as Bernanke suggests, that raising the interest rate paid on reserves in such a setting would be a policy tool that could be used in response.  But it would be an unattractive measure to the point of perhaps being impossible to use in practice, for the same reason other countries have dreaded raising interest rates in the face of collapsing real economic activity and a flight from their currency.</p>

<p>I fear that the United States government is mistakenly assuming that it can borrow essentially unlimited sums without undermining confidence in the dollar itself.  The real question of a successful exit strategy, in my opinion, is how do we extricate ourselves from the <a href="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/07/offbalancesheet.html">joint fiscal commitments</a> currently assumed by the Treasury, the Fed, the FDIC, the Medicare and Social Security trust funds, and various and sundry implicit and explicit federal guarantees?</p>

<p>The answer, in my opinion, is not to be found in the Treasury doing even more borrowing on behalf of the Fed or the Fed doing even more borrowing on behalf of itself.</p> 

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/looking-for-an-exit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AllScripts Posts Strong Q4 &amp; FY &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/allscripts-posts-strong-q4-fy-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/allscripts-posts-strong-q4-fy-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cerner Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertyville;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MedAssets Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misys Plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Systems Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/22501/AllScripts+Posts+Strong+Q4+%26+FY+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><br />
</em><strong><em>Allscripts reports strong fourth quarter and full year results</em><br />
<br />
Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mdrx">MDRX</a>) reported fourth quarter and full fiscal year 2009 results. Both Non-GAAP EPS and revenue for the quarter exceeded the Street&#8217;s expectations.<br />
<br />
Non-GAAP EPS was $0.16, above the $0.15 expected by the Street. Total revenue for the quarter was $166.2 million, compared to the Street&#8217;s expectations of $160.5 million.<br />
 <br />
<u><em><strong>Quarterly results</strong></em></u><br />
 <br />
Total revenue for the quarter increased 71% y/y. Growth was seen across all business segments.<br />
<br />
Total non-GAAP revenue for the quarter was $168.8 million, a decline of roughly 3% y/y. Non-GAAP revenue included a deferred revenue adjustment in the quarter and the standalone Allscripts revenue before the merger in the year-ago quarter.<br />
<em><strong><br />
Margins</strong></em><br />
<br />
Gross margin increased due to higher total revenue (&#8593;71% y/y) that offset the increased cost of sales (&#8593;60% y/y). However, higher selling, general and administrative expenses and amortization of intangibles, both as a percentage of total revenue, were a drag on the company&#8217;s operating and net margins.<br />
<br />
<em><strong>EPS</strong></em><br />
 <br />
GAAP EPS in the quarter was $0.09, compared to $0.13 in the year-ago quarter. Non-GAAP EPS in the quarter was $0.16, compared to $0.22 in the year-ago quarter. Non-GAAP EPS excluded one-time items like the acquisition related amortization expense, stock-based compensation, transaction-related expense and eliminate the contribution from prepackaged medications. On the other hand, it included Allscripts' net income alone, pre-merger, and a deferred revenue adjustment.<br />
 <br />
<u><em><strong>Fiscal Year results</strong></em></u><br />
 <br />
Total revenue for the year was $548.4 million, an increase of 43% over that in fiscal 2008. Growth was seen across all the business segments.<br />
 <br />
Total non-GAAP revenue for the year was $680.5 million, an increase of roughly 2% y/y. Non-GAAP revenue included a deferred revenue adjustment and the Allscripts revenue alone, pre-merger.<br />
<em><strong><br />
Margins</strong></em><br />
<br />
A lower gross margin coupled with higher selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue were a drag on the company&#8217;s operating and net margins.  <br />
 <br />
<em><strong>EPS</strong></em><br />
<br />
GAAP EPS in the year was $0.21, compared to $0.31 last year. Non-GAAP EPS was $0.60, compared to $0.71 last year.<br />
<br />
Libertyville, Illinois-based Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. is a leading provider of clinical software and information solutions for physicians. In October 2008, the company merged with Misys Plc, a global applications software and services company, to form Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc.<br />
 <br />
Allscripts is likely to benefit most from the recent Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (H.R. 6331) passed by the U.S. Congress. The Act, for the first time ever, provides financial incentives to physicians who adopt electronic prescribing (ePrescribing), requires adoption by 2011, and delays any reduction in fees for treating Medicare patients.<br />
<br />
Allscripts faces strong competition from <strong>Cerner Corporation</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cern">CERN</a>), <strong>Quality Systems Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/qsii">QSII</a>) and <strong>MedAssets Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mdas">MDAS</a>). Based on the company&#8217;s performance in the fourth quarter and full year, we reiterate our Hold rating on Allscripts.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MDRX">Read the full analyst report on "MDRX"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CERN">Read the full analyst report on "CERN"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=QSII">Read the full analyst report on "QSII"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MDAS">Read the full analyst report on "MDAS"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/allscripts-posts-strong-q4-fy-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Dale Davidson: US Will Be Buried in $110.7 Trillion Avalanche of Debt</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/james-dale-davidson-us-will-be-buried-in-110-7-trillion-avalanche-of-debt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/james-dale-davidson-us-will-be-buried-in-110-7-trillion-avalanche-of-debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas taxes;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pJames Dale Davidson’s latest special report, “The Plague of the Black Debt,” went live to emNotes/em readers yesterday. For those of you who missed it, you can access it a id="s6vt" title="here" href="http://www.profitablenews.com/?p=519#38;source=bdniuedm"here/a.  James’s message is simple: the $110.7 trillion in outstanding US debt is about to bury the US economy./p
pUnfortunately, it’s too late to reverse course for America. President Obama’s spending program is speeding up the collapse, not slowing it down. Right now, 21 cents out of every $1 paid over to the feds in income tax goes to paying off the interest on the national debt. Soon, it will be almost double that amount. It doesn’t take a genius to work out that this is unsustainable./p
pIt doesn’t take a genius, either, to figure out#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/james-dale-davidson-us-will-be-buried-in-110-7-trillion-avalanche-of-debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 10 Reasons You Should Be Mad as Hell Right Now</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-10-reasons-you-should-be-mad-as-hell-right-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-10-reasons-you-should-be-mad-as-hell-right-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Ritholz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureau of Economic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief of staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deposit insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doug casey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitler;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Beale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Beale-style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest rate observer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Schumpeter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national    endowment for the arts;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Finch;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahm Emanuel;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate valuations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities & Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smithsonian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pDo you remember the first time you saw a rain drenched Peter Finch a title="scream" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMBZDwf9dok" target="_blank"scream/a, “I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this anymore!”? We do. We were too young to see emNetwork/em in the cinema (the movie came out the year we were born: 1976). Instead, we watched it late one night on TV. And we’ll never forget the moment when Finch’s character, news anchor Howard Beale, arrives in the television studio in his tan raincoat with a deranged look on his face and begins to speak to camera./p
p/p
blockquote
ulI don#8217;t have to tell you things are bad. Everybody knows things are bad. It#8217;s a depression. Everybody#8217;s out of work or scared of losing their job. The dollar buys a#8230;/ul/blockquote]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-10-reasons-you-should-be-mad-as-hell-right-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal deficit crosses $1 trillion mark with a vengeance</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/federal-deficit-crosses-1-trillion-mark-with-a-vengeance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/federal-deficit-crosses-1-trillion-mark-with-a-vengeance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prieur du Plessis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment postcards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Sylvia;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells Fargo Securities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/?p=8660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both spending and tax receipts put in double-digit performances to produce a US ten-digit deficit (actually $1.1 trillion) for the first nine months of the fiscal year and broke a monthly record of $94 billion in June. "No doubt where this train is going," said John Sylvia, chief economist of Wells Fargo Securities. His additional comments follow below.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/federal-deficit-crosses-1-trillion-mark-with-a-vengeance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk Returns… Slowly</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/commodities/risk-returns%e2%80%a6-slowly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/commodities/risk-returns%e2%80%a6-slowly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concord Coalition;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current administration;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaney Grace;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deputy director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eye specialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fave economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Trotter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HKD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I.O.U.S.A.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth S. Rogoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koruna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental giant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of Management and Budget;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLN;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Aversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Nabors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bank of England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ty;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pCurrencies rebound#8230;  G-8 has no fireworks#8230;  Aussie / China and coal#8230; Entitlements#8230; And Now#8230; Today#8217;s Pfennig!/p
p/p
pGood day#8230; And a Tub Thumpin#8217; Thursday to you! I#8217;m late, I#8217;m late! I don#8217;t believe I ever heard the alarm go off this morning! I overslept by more than an hour, and will still be here more than an hour before any sign of someone else! But! That puts me behind by more than an hour today#8230; I#8217;ve got to play catch-up! So, let#8217;s get this Tub Thumpin#8217; Thursday going!/p
pWell#8230; Let#8217;s see#8230; G-8 never had the opportunity to shoot fireworks because China#8217;s leader had to return home to deal with the street riots going on in his country. So#8230; The call for a replacement for the dollar#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/commodities/risk-returns%e2%80%a6-slowly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Fight Back Against The Government’s Imminent Tax Hikes</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/how-to-fight-back-against-the-government%e2%80%99s-imminent-tax-hikes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/how-to-fight-back-against-the-government%e2%80%99s-imminent-tax-hikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candidate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton aide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stephanopolous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry King;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuveen Insured Municipal Opportunity Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pBuy tax-free bonds - now.  If you’re a mutual fund investor, buy them through a href="https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/bonds"Vanguard/a (the average fund company charges expenses six times higher than Vanguard’s)./p
pIf you are a closed-end investor, try a tax-free fund like strongNuveen Insured Municipal Opportunity Fund/strong (NYSE:a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=nio"NIO/a), trading at a 10% discount to its net asset value and yielding over 6% paid monthly./p
pOr, to avoid annual expenses and have the certainty of a final value on a particular date, buy individual tax-free bonds./p
pstrong/strong/p
pBut whatever you do, buy them now. Let me count the reasons why you should…strong/strong/p
pstrong/strongstrongThree Reasons Why Municipal Bonds Make A Good Investment Now/strong/p
ol type="1"
liTen-year municipal bonds, while down from the historic premium they reached a few months ago, are yielding as much as 10-year Treasuries. But while#8230;/li/ol]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/how-to-fight-back-against-the-government%e2%80%99s-imminent-tax-hikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pity the Poor Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/pity-the-poor-rich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/pity-the-poor-rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecile Chevre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cushy chair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French  government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare obligations;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petersen Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss Army;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willie Sutton;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p class="byline"There is little financial news today; markets in America were closed for the 4th of July weekend. So, we begin our week with a quote from our favorite philosopher: Yu Faz. “The rich man’s heart breaks…just like the poor man’s. For all his money, he cannot buy another one.”/p
div class="entry-content"
pYu should know. He was exiled after he had a liaison amoureuse with one of Genghis’ concubines./p
pPity poor Yu! strongPity the poor rich…!/strong Here at emThe a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links"Daily Reckoning/a/em, as long-term emDR/em sufferers know, we always take the part of the underdog. We almost never saw a lost cause that we didn’t want to join. We admire die-hards…and we like the company of scalawags./p
pSo, today, we take up the banner of one group that is all these things…a group that#8230;/p/div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/pity-the-poor-rich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Off-balance-sheet federal liabilities</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/off-balance-sheet-federal-liabilities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/off-balance-sheet-federal-liabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hamilton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intragovernmental accounting entries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U .S. Federal Reserve;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment-insurance trust funds;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/07/offbalancesheet.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just how much has the U.S. government promised to pay?</p>

<p><a href="http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np">Total public debt outstanding</a> of the U.S. Federal Government is currently $11,490 billion, or $124,000 <a href="http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/1410.html">per taxpayer</a>.  But a fair chunk of that total public debt-- $4,350 B to be exact-- is money that the government owes to itself, about half to the Social Security Trust Fund, and the remainder to other government accounts such as Civil Service Retirement and Disability, Military Retirement, Medicare, and Unemployment Insurance Trust Funds.  The debt actually held by the public is "only" $7,140 billion, which amounts to half of last year's GDP.  The <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/102xx/doc10297/SupplementalData2009LTBO.xls">Congressional Budget Office</a> estimates that debt held by the public will rise to 56.6% of GDP by the end of this year.  That will put the number well above the peaks reached in the Revolutionary War, Civil War, World War I, or the Reagan years, though still significantly below the debt run up from World War II.</p>

<br />

<table>
<caption align="bottom"> <h5>
Figure 1. Federal debt held by the public as a percent of GDP, 1790-2008, and projected for 2009.  Data source: 
<a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/102xx/doc10297/SupplementalData2009LTBO.xls">Congressional Budget Office</a>.
</h5></caption>
<tr><td><img alt="debt1_jul_09.gif" src="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/07/debt1_jul_09.gif"/></td></tr></table>

<br />

<p>But is it correct to subtract off the $4.3 trillion that the government owes "to itself"?  These intragovernmental accounting entries represent an intention of the government to deliver real resources to certain parties, such as retirees, at a future date, so perhaps we should include them in a reckoning of all that the government has promised to pay.  On the other hand, given what is currently promised, and given trends in the aging population and rising medical costs, if benefit formulas continue as present, the amount that the government would be obligated to deliver far exceeds the sums acknowledged in the intragovernmental debt accounts or what could be covered with future tax revenues.</p>

<p>One calculation that the <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/102xx/doc10297/06-25-LTBO.pdf">CBO has performed</a> is what they call an "alternative fiscal scenario" representing</p>

<blockquote><p>one interpretation
of what it would mean to continue today's underlying
fiscal policy. This scenario deviates from CBO's
baseline even during the next 10 years because it incorporates
some policy changes that are widely expected to
occur and that policymakers have regularly made in the
past.</p></blockquote>

<p>According to the CBO, in the absence of a significant increase in taxes above historical rates or change in benefit policies, growth in Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid would quickly produce an explosion of federal debt.</p>

<br />

<table>
<caption align="bottom"> <h5>
Figure 2. Debt held by the public as a percent of GDP, 1790-2008, and projected for 2009-2083 under the "alternative fiscal scenario".  Data source: 
<a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/102xx/doc10297/SupplementalData2009LTBO.xls">Congressional Budget Office</a>.
</h5></caption>
<tr><td><img alt="debt2_jul_09.gif" src="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/07/debt2_jul_09.gif"/></td></tr></table>

<br />

<p>Of course such a path is completely infeasible and unsustainable.  Then what exactly is the government promising to provide in the way of retirement medical care and income for those currently working, and what will the government actually deliver?  The answer to both questions is unclear to me, though I have no doubt that this category of off-balance-sheet liability represents a potentially staggering sum.</p>

<p>But whatever you think future spending on Medicare will be, consider some of the other off-balance sheet federal promises.  At the end of 2008, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation had insured <a href="http://www.fdic.gov/about/strategic/report/2008annualreport/AR08appendix.pdf">$4.8 trillion</a> in deposits. Fannie and Freddie, which are now effectively nationalized, bring perhaps another <a href="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2008/07/fannie_mae_and.html">$4.9 trillion</a> in notional liabilities to the table.  Those two alone sum to an amount well in excess of the current federal debt owed to the public. </p>

<p>Ah, but the federal government wouldn't actually be asked to honor more than a small fraction of those guarantees, would it?  Only a few <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/07/fdic-bank-failures-by-week.html">banks will fail</a>, and the <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/06/occ-and-ots-prime-delinquencies-surge.html">prime loans</a> insured by Fannie and Freddie are safe, right?  Right?</p>

<p>Still, even a modest fraction of $10 trillion sounds like <a href="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2009/03/how_much_is_a_t.html">a lot of money</a> to me.</p>

<p>Then there's the loose change, such as the <a href="http://www.fhlb-of.com/specialinterest/financialframe.html">$1.1 trillion in obligations</a> of the Federal Home Loan Banks.  The federal government does not officially acknowledge responsibility for the liabilities of these government-sponsored enterprises, though that of course is what it had also claimed about Fannie and Freddie.  Government-owned Ginnie Mae has issued guarantees on another <a href="http://www.ginniemae.gov/about/ann_rep/annual_financials08.pdf">$577 billion</a> in mortgage-backed securities, while the Federal Housing Administration has insured <a href="http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/fhafy08annualmanagementreport.pdf">$532 billion</a> in mortgages.  The U.S. Federal Reserve has added <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/">$1.1 trillion</a> to its liabilities since September. And now loan guarantees appear to be the instrument of choice for U.S. energy policy (<a href="http://www.lgprogram.energy.gov/">[1]</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/17/AR2009061701699.html">[2]</a>).</p>

<p>Of course there's a simple reason why all this happens.  There is tremendous pressure for politicians to deliver in the form of off-balance-sheet commitments.  Voters credit them for giving us what we want now, and blame somebody else when the time comes to pay for it.  I'm amazed that no one is being held accountable for the fiasco of Fannie and Freddie, and indeed leading elected officials continue to advocate <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124562533240635581.html">more of the same policies</a> that created the original problem.</p>

<p>Some might look at Figure 1 and conclude that the U.S. could issue much more debt and still find ready buyers.  But I worry that Figure 1 is only the tip of a very big iceberg.</p>   

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/off-balance-sheet-federal-liabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The U.S. Treasury Moves The Goal Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-u-s-treasury-moves-the-goal-posts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-u-s-treasury-moves-the-goal-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice Rivlin;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashish Advani;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernie Madoff;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaney Grace;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Soros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HKD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Budget committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koruna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Min Zeng]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLN;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reserve Bank of New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reserve member]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Bank Of Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruth ;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P/CaseShiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereign Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sue Trinh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.dailypfennig.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.web-purchases.com/CUC/WCUCJ900/landing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pA 4-day rally gets stopped at the border#8230;  Home Prices fall at a -18.12% pace#8230;  Alice Rivlin gives her 2-cents#8230;br /
* Kiwi bond maturities galore next month#8230; And Now#8230; Today#8217;s Pfennig!br /
Good day#8230; And a Wonderful Wednesday to you! As tradition with the Pfennig would have it, here#8217;s my introduction to July#8230; There I was#8230; On a July morning#8230; Looking for love#8230; With the strength of a new day dawning, and#8230; The beautiful sun#8230;/p
pYes, for those #8220;old rockers#8221; from the 70#8217;s like me#8230; That#8217;s Uriah Heep, at their best!/p
pOK#8230; So, welcome to July! The last day of June was quite the volatile one to say the least! There we were waiting for the S#38;P/CaseShiller Home Price Index to print, and show that home prices were#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-u-s-treasury-moves-the-goal-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Debt Eventually Bring America to Her Knees?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/will-debt-eventually-bring-america-to-her-knees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/will-debt-eventually-bring-america-to-her-knees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Carnegie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Minds Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO and founder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Risk Monitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Wakefield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Flum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel magnate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pAs California goes, so will the US. It is our strong suspicion here at strongemNotes/em/strong that California’s fiscal crisis (what is really a profligate spending crisis) is but a prelude to the coming national debt crisis./p
pLast Thursday, ratings agency Fitch dropped the Golden State’s credit rating to A-minus and immediately placed that on negative credit watch. California shares three major problems with the US. It faces:/p
ol type="1"
liA crippling budget deficit/li
liDeclining tax revenues/li
liA legislature that won’t face up to critical issues./li
/ol
pOver the weekend, we read in wonder that by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office’s own estimation America’s national debt is now growing so quickly that it will exceed the size of the economy in 2023 – emseven years earlier than the projections of the last#8230;/em/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/will-debt-eventually-bring-america-to-her-knees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart Thwarts Pharmacy Business  &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wal-mart-thwarts-pharmacy-business-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wal-mart-thwarts-pharmacy-business-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooks Eckerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVS Caremark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low and retail sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overall retail sales;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail businesses;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail generic drug market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail pharmacists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rite Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walgreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21596/Wal-Mart+Thwarts+Pharmacy+Business++-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>The outlook for the drug store industry is negative. Although the demographics of an aging U.S. population are favorable for the prescription drug industry, the outlook for pharmacies remains clouded due to several influences on the industry. </p>
<p align="left">Competition will remain stiff in the pharmacy segment as other retail businesses continue to add pharmacy departments and as other low-cost pharmacy options come on-line. Discount retailers, in particular, have made substantial inroads in gaining market share during the last year. The trend toward generic drugs, while providing better margins for retail pharmacists, is expected to slow over the next year. In addition, various drug re-importation schemes have been proposed by large employers and state and local governments in an effort to manage escalating healthcare costs. </p>
<p align="left">Clouding the outlook further is the legislation that provides drug benefits under Medicare. Real GDP declined 6.3% in the fourth quarter of 2008, and the unemployment rate rose to 8.5% in March 2009. Consumer confidence is low and retail sales fell 1.1% in March. Consumer confidence is a key to consumer willingness to make purchases, which accounts for nearly three-quarters of all U.S. economic activity. Falling home sales and declining financial markets have negatively impacted consumer spending over the last few months. Due to the housing crisis, consumers are uncertain about home refinancing and financing, a key source of consumer discretionary spending. Overall retail sales (and related front-end sales in drug stores) are expected to be under pressure until consumer confidence rebounds. </p>
<p align="left">Companies like <b>Rite Aid</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/rad">RAD</a>), <b>CVS Caremark</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cvs">CVS</a>), and <b>Walgreen</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wag">WAG</a>), are all facing severe margin contraction due to <b>Wal-Mart</b>'s (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wmt">WMT</a>) foray into the retail generic drug market. </p>
<p align="left">Moreover, for Rite Aid, the acquisition of Brooks Eckerd increased both debt burden and interest expense. Further, the company has also shut down many stores as it reported a loss in the latest quarter. Moreover, it competes with Walgreen and CVS Caremark, both of which are expanding. In addition, both companies have higher margins than Rite Aid due to structural cost advantages, including purchasing power to obtain lower cost merchandise and significantly less interest expense. </p>
<p align="left">Therefore, we currently hold a sell rating on Rite Aid, and a Hold rating on CVS Caremark and Walgreen. </p>
<p align="left"></p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=RAD">Read the full analyst report on "RAD"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CVS">Read the full analyst report on "CVS"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WAG">Read the full analyst report on "WAG"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WMT">Read the full analyst report on "WMT"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wal-mart-thwarts-pharmacy-business-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Elephant in the Room</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-elephant-in-the-room/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-elephant-in-the-room/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p“Under current law, the federal budget is on an unsustainable path,” begins the latest report from the Congressional Budget Office. The report, titled The Long Term Budget Outlook, was about as bad as you’d expect… maybe even worse. /p
pAt the heart of the matter, this chart:/p
p style="text-align: center;"a class="flickr-image alignnone" title="Projected US Debt Obligations" href="http://www.agorafinancial.com/5min/crazy-debt-projections-the-new-global-currency-congress-very-bad-idea-and-more/"/a/p
pThe CBO (which is a government arm, mind you) predicts that, under the most likely scenario, our national debt will exceed 100% of our GDP by 2023… 200% by the late 2030s. Man, who could have seen this coming?/p
pIn formulating their projections, the CBO used two scenarios. The first, the “extended baseline scenario,” assumes things will remain about the same over the next decade… all scheduled changes under current law will occur and all budget#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-elephant-in-the-room/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Industry Rank Analysis Highlights: Stericycle, Quest Diagnostic, Biogen Idec, AmeriSourceBergen, Abbott Labs, Tesoro, AK Steel, Nucor, United States Steel, Fifth Third, Zions Bancorp, Suntrust Banks, Franklin Resources and Micron &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-industry-rank-analysis-highlights-stericycle-quest-diagnostic-biogen-idec-amerisourcebergen-abbott-labs-tesoro-ak-steel-nucor-united-states-steel-fifth-third-zions-bancorp-suntrust-b/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-industry-rank-analysis-highlights-stericycle-quest-diagnostic-biogen-idec-amerisourcebergen-abbott-labs-tesoro-ak-steel-nucor-united-states-steel-fifth-third-zions-bancorp-suntrust-b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 - Zacks.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbott Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ak Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmeriSourceBergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biogen Idec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Rotblut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fdic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Third]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franklin Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Adviser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Semiconductor;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nucor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheraz Mian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunoco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suntrust Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesoro;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Instruments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zions Bancorp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21447/Zacks+Industry+Rank+Analysis+Highlights%3A+Stericycle%2C+Quest+Diagnostic%2C+Biogen+Idec%2C+AmeriSourceBergen%2C+Abbott+Labs%2C+Tesoro%2C+AK+Steel%2C+Nucor%2C+United+States+Steel%2C+Fifth+Third%2C+Zions+Bancorp%2C+Sun</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>For Immediate Release</b> 
<p align="left">Chicago, IL - June 25, 2009 - Zacks.com releases the latest Zacks Industry Rank. Stocks featured in this week's analysis include <b>Stericycle</b> (<a href="void(0)">SRCL</a>), <b>Quest Diagnostic </b>(<a href="void(0)">DGX</a>), <b>Biogen Idec</b> (<a href="void(0)">BIIB</a>), <b>AmeriSourceBergen </b>(<a href="void(0)">ABC</a>), <b>Abbott Labs </b>(<a href="void(0)">ABT</a>), <b>Sunoco </b>(<a href="void(0)">SUN</a>), <b>Tesoro</b> (<a href="void(0)">TSO</a>), <b>AK Steel</b> (<a href="void(0)">AKS</a>), <b>Nucor </b>(<a href="void(0)">NUE</a>), <b>United States Steel </b>(<a href="void(0)">X</a>), <b>Fifth Third</b> (<a href="void(0)">FITB</a>), <b>First Horizon National </b>(<a href="void(0)">FHN</a>), <b>Zions Bancorp </b>(<a href="void(0)">ZION</a>), <b>Suntrust Banks </b>(<a href="void(0)">STI</a>), <b>Franklin Resources </b>(<a href="void(0)">BEN</a>), <b>AllianceBernstein Holding </b>(<a href="void(0)">AB</a>), <b>Texas Instruments </b>(<a href="void(0)">TXN</a>), <b>National Semiconductor </b>(<a href="void(0)">NSM</a>) and <b>Micron</b> (<a href="void(0)">MU</a>). </p>
<p align="left">Zacks Industry Rank Analysis is written by Charles Rotblut, CFA, Senior Market Analyst for Zacks.com. </p>
<p align="left"><b>This Week: Second-Quarter Earnings Outlook </b></p>
<p align="left">Second-quarter earnings will be ugly. </p>
<p align="left">Median EPS is projected to drop 21.2%. Nearly 75% of S&#38;P 500 members are forecast to report earnings that are lower than a year ago. 62 companies are projected to have lost money. </p>
<p align="left">These numbers are not unexpected given that we remain in the midst of a recession. They could even prove to be too pessimistic given the propensity of companies to surprise and the relative improvements in economic conditions. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Growth Industries</b> </p>
<p align="left">The one sector projected to show the strongest growth is also the one with the highest political risk - Medical. The majority of medical care providers, health insurers, pharmacy benefit managers and drug companies should report a year-over-year increase in profits. </p>
<p align="left">Zacks #2 Rank ("buy") stocks expected to report growth include <b>Stericycle</b> (<a href="void(0)">SRCL</a>) (+14.4%), <b>Quest Diagnostic </b>(<a href="void(0)">DGX</a>) (+13%), <b>Biogen Idec</b> (<a href="void(0)">BIIB</a>) (+9.8%), <b>AmeriSourceBergen </b>(<a href="void(0)">ABC</a>) (+7%) and <b>Abbott Labs </b>(<a href="void(0)">ABT</a>) (+5%). </p>
<p align="left">The medical sector is less economically sensitivity than other sectors. Plus, the expansion of Medicare Part D has made prescriptions more affordable. </p>
<p align="left">The obvious risk, however, is the ongoing discussions about healthcare reform. Though these talks have no impact on current earnings, they could significantly impact future earnings. </p>
<p align="left">Another area of growth is refining. <b>Sunoco </b>(<a href="void(0)">SUN</a>) and <b>Tesoro</b> (<a href="void(0)">TSO</a>) are expected to have increased second-quarter profits by 46% and 223.7% respectively. These impressive numbers are a reflection of last year's spike in oil prices. </p>
<p align="left">The problem is that the recent rise in oil prices is hurting margins. </p>
<p align="left">Full-year earnings estimates are falling for both companies, which means even if TSO and other refiners top expectations, guidance could be weak. Our oil analyst, Sheraz Mian, downgraded TSO last month to a long-term sell recommendation. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Industries With Profit Declines</b> </p>
<p align="left">Since most industries will show a year-over-year decline in median EPS growth, I'm going to focus on 2 industries with the biggest projected declines. </p>
<p align="left">Steel is among the worst, with 3 companies - <b>AK Steel</b> (<a href="void(0)">AKS</a>), <b>Nucor </b>(<a href="void(0)">NUE</a>) and <b>United States Steel </b>(<a href="void(0)">X</a>) - projected to report year-over-year declines in excess of 130% each. </p>
<p align="left">These companies are facing very tough comparables because of last year's commodity bubble. Though <b>AK Steel</b> (<a href="void(0)">AKS</a>) said on Tuesday that its results would show a sequential quarterly improvement, any narrower loss would be because of cost-cutting and not improving business conditions.</p>
<p align="left">NUE is a Zacks #4 Rank ("sell") stock. AKS and X are Zacks #3 Rank ("hold") stocks. </p>
<p align="left">Banks will not fare much better. Regional banks are forecast to report a median decline of 98.7% and the large banks are projected to report a 61.3% decrease. Though the government has deemed some banks too big to fail, the FDIC has shut down 40 since the start of the year. </p>
<p align="left">Home foreclosures have yet to peak and credit card default rates are rising. At the same, the ongoing housing slump and tighter credit standards continue to hurt mortgage originations. And though Q208 was not great for the banks, the credit crunch was not as severe as what was witnessed in the second half of 2009. </p>
<p align="left">The largest year-over-year declines is likely to come from <b>Fifth Third</b> (<a href="void(0)">FITB</a>) (-689.3%, the bank is swinging from a profit, on an adjusted basis, to a loss), <b>First Horizon National </b>(<a href="void(0)">FHN</a>) (-211.6%), <b>Zions Bancorp </b>(<a href="void(0)">ZION</a>) (-189.7%) and <b>Suntrust Banks </b>(<a href="void(0)">STI</a>) (-166%). </p>
<p align="left"><b>Where To Look For Surprises</b> </p>
<p align="left">There are 2 industry groups that I would keep an eye on for potential positive surprises - <a href="http://www.zacks.com/zrank/zrank_ind.php?i=63">Finance-Investment Management</a> and <a href="http://www.zacks.com/zrank/zrank_ind.php?i=49">Electronic-Semiconductor</a>. </p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/commentary/11234/Forecasts+Rising+For+Fund+Managers">As I said last week</a>, profit forecasts are rising for several mutual fund managers, including <b>Franklin Resources </b>(<a href="void(0)">BEN</a>) and <b>AllianceBernstein Holding </b>(<a href="void(0)">AB</a>). </p>
<p align="left">Positive mutual fund inflows and growth in assets under management have some analysts rethinking their forecasts. However, since many of the covering analysts have not followed suit, the consensus earnings estimates could prove to be too low. </p>
<p align="left">The semiconductor industry appears to be in the early stages of a recovery. Therefore, while profits will be terrible (down -61.5%), they could very well be better than forecast. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Texas Instruments </b>(<a href="void(0)">TXN</a>) raised its Q2 forecast earlier this month, SEMI's (a chip industry association) book-to-bill ratio has increased for 3 consecutive months and analysts have been revising their full-year forecasts higher. Plus, <b>National Semiconductor </b>(<a href="void(0)">NSM</a>) beat by 18 cents when it reported last week. </p>
<p align="left">We'll get another early indicator of how chip earnings look relative to expectations this afternoon, when <b>Micron</b> (<a href="void(0)">MU</a>) reports. The consensus earnings estimate calls for a loss of 43 cents per share. </p>
<p align="left">Zacks "<a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5611">Profit from the Pros</a> " e-mail newsletter offers continuous coverage of the industries and the stocks poised to outperform the market. Subscribe to this free newsletter today by visiting <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5611">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5611</a>. </p>
<p align="left"><b>About Zacks</b> </p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3:1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit From the Pros by going to <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5610">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5610</a>. </p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/ZacksInvestment">http://twitter.com/ZacksInvestment</a> </p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a> </p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release. </p>
<p align="left">Zacks Investment Research is under common control with affiliated entities (including a broker-dealer and an investment adviser), which may engage in transactions involving the foregoing securities for the clients of such affiliates. </p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security. </p>
<p align="left">Contact: Charles Rotblut, CFA<br />Company: Zacks.com<br />Phone: 312-265-9352<br />Email: <a href="http://www.zacks.com/blog/pr@zacks.com">pr@zacks.com</a><br />Visit: <a href="http://www.zacks.com/blog/www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a><br /></p>
<p align="left"></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-industry-rank-analysis-highlights-stericycle-quest-diagnostic-biogen-idec-amerisourcebergen-abbott-labs-tesoro-ak-steel-nucor-united-states-steel-fifth-third-zions-bancorp-suntrust-b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second-Quarter Earnings Outlook &#8211; Zacks Industry Rank Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/second-quarter-earnings-outlook-zacks-industry-rank-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/second-quarter-earnings-outlook-zacks-industry-rank-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Rotblut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbott Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ak Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmeriSourceBergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biogen Idec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Rotblut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fdic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Third]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franklin Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Semiconductor;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nucor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senior market analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheraz Mian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunoco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suntrust Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesoro;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Instruments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zions Bancorp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/11306/Second-Quarter+Earnings+Outlook+-+Zacks+Industry+Rank+Analysis</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Second-quarter earnings will be ugly.
<p ALIGN="left">
Median EPS is projected to drop 21.2%. Nearly 75% of S&#38;P 500 members are forecast to report earnings that are lower than a year ago. 62 companies are projected to have lost money.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
These numbers are not unexpected given that we remain in the midst of a recession. They could even prove to be too pessimistic given the propensity of companies to surprise and the relative improvements in economic conditions.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Growth Industries</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The one sector projected to show the strongest growth is also the one with the highest political risk - Medical. The majority of medical care providers, health insurers, pharmacy benefit managers and drug companies should report a year-over-year increase in profits.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Zacks #2 Rank ("buy") stocks expected to report growth include <b>Stericycle</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/SRCL">SRCL</a>) (+14.4%), <b>Quest Diagnostic</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/DGX">DGX</a>) (+13%), <b>Biogen Idec</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BIIB">BIIB</a>) (+9.8%), <b>AmeriSourceBergen</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ABC">ABC</a>) (+7%) and <b>Abbott Labs</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ABT">ABT</a>) (+5%).
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The medical sector is less economically sensitivity than other sectors. Plus, the expansion of Medicare Part D has made prescriptions more affordable.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The obvious risk, however, is the ongoing discussions about healthcare reform. Though these talks have no impact on current earnings, they could significantly impact future earnings.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Another area of growth is refining. <b>Sunoco</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/SUN">SUN</a>) and <b>Tesoro</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/TSO">TSO</a>) are expected to have increased second-quarter profits by 46% and 223.7%, respectively. These impressive numbers are a reflection of last year's spike in oil prices.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The problem is that the recent rise in oil prices is hurting margins.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Full-year earnings estimates are falling for both companies, which means even if SUN and TSO top expectations, guidance could be weak. Our oil analyst, Sheraz Mian, downgraded TSO last month to a long-term sell recommendation.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Industries With Profit Declines</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Since most industries will show a year-over-year decline in median EPS growth, I'm going to focus on 2 industries with the biggest projected declines.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Steel is among the worst, with 3 companies - <b>AK Steel</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AKS">AKS</a>), <b>Nucor</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/NUE">NUE</a>) and <b>United States Steel</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/X">X</a>) - projected to report year-over-year declines in excess of 130% each.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
These companies are facing very tough comparables because of last year's commodity bubble. Though AKS said yesterday that its results would show a sequential quarterly improvement, any narrower loss would be because of cost-cutting and not improving business conditions.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
NUE is a Zacks #4 Rank ("sell") stock. AKS and X are Zacks #3 Rank ("hold") stocks.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Banks will not fare much better. Regional banks are forecast to report a median decline of 98.7% and the large banks are projected to report a 61.3% decrease. Though the government has deemed some banks too big to fail, the FDIC has shut down 40 since the start of the year.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Home foreclosures have yet to peak and credit card default rates are rising. At the same, the ongoing housing slump and tighter credit standards continue to hurt mortgage originations. And though Q208 was not great for the banks, the credit crunch was not as severe as what was witnessed in the second half of 2009.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The largest year-over-year declines are likely to come from <b>Fifth Third</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/FITB">FITB</a>) (-689.3%, the bank is swinging from a profit, on an adjusted basis, to a loss), <b>First Horizon National</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/FHN">FHN</a>) (-211.6%), <b>Zions Bancorp</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ZION">ZION</a>) (-189.7%) and <b>Suntrust Banks</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/STI">STI</a>) (-166%).
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Where To Look For Surprises</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
There are 2 industry groups that I would keep an eye on for potential positive surprises - <a href="http://www.zacks.com/zrank/zrank_ind.php?i=63">Finance-Investment Management</a> and <a href="http://www.zacks.com/zrank/zrank_ind.php?i=49">Electronic-Semiconductor</a>.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<a href="http://www.zacks.com/commentary/11234/Forecasts+Rising+For+Fund+Managers">As I said last week</a>, profit forecasts are rising for several mutual fund managers, including <b>Franklin Resources</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BEN">BEN</a>) and <b>AllianceBernstein Holding</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AB">AB</a>).
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Positive mutual fund inflows and growth in assets under management have some analysts rethinking their forecasts. However, since many of the covering analysts have not followed suit, the consensus earnings estimates could prove to be too low.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The semiconductor industry appears to be in the early stages of a recovery. Therefore, while profits will be terrible (down -61.5%), they could very well be better than forecast.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Texas Instruments</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/TXN">TXN</a>) raised its Q2 forecast earlier this month,  SEMI's (a chip industry association) book-to-bill ratio has increased for 3  consecutive months and analysts have been revising their full-year forecasts higher. Plus, <b>National Semiconductor</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/NSM">NSM</a>) beat by 18 cents when it reported last week.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
We'll get another early indicator of how chip earnings look relative to expectations tomorrow, when <b>Micron</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MU">MU</a>) reports. The consensus earnings estimate calls for a loss of 43 cents per share.

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<a href="http://www.zacks.com/registration_info.php">Zacks Premium and Zacks Elite</a> subscribers can view the Zacks Industry Rank List at <a href="http://www.zacks.com/zrank/zrank_inds.php">http://www.zacks.com/zrank/zrank_inds.php</a>. This interactive list allows you to see all of the companies, and their Zacks Rank, within more than 200 industries. Shown below is the Zacks Sector Rank List, which shows the trend in estimate revisions on a broader scale.
</p><p>
</p><p align="center">

<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tr><td colspan="7" align="center"><b>Sector Rank as of Jun 24<br /></b></td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#A2D39C"><td align="left"><b><u>	Sector	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	This Week's<br />Zacks Rank	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	Last Week's<br />Zacks Rank	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	FY09<br />Revisions Ratio	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	FY09 Estimates<br />Revised Up	</u></b></td>	<td align="center"><b><u>	FY09 Estimates<br />Revised Down	</u></b></td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Retail-Wholesale	</td>	<td align="center">	2.57	</td>	<td align="center">	2.52	</td>	<td align="center">	2.79	</td>	<td align="center">	419	</td>	<td align="center">	150	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Consumer Staples	</td>	<td align="center">	2.78	</td>	<td align="center">	2.80	</td>	<td align="center">	1.91	</td>	<td align="center">	174	</td>	<td align="center">	91	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Medical	</td>	<td align="center">	2.87	</td>	<td align="center">	2.91	</td>	<td align="center">	1.20	</td>	<td align="center">	243	</td>	<td align="center">	202	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Consumer Discretionary	</td>	<td align="center">	2.89	</td>	<td align="center">	2.85	</td>	<td align="center">	0.93	</td>	<td align="center">	136	</td>	<td align="center">	146	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Computer and Technology	</td>	<td align="center">	2.93	</td>	<td align="center">	2.94	</td>	<td align="center">	1.98	</td>	<td align="center">	513	</td>	<td align="center">	259	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Utilities	</td>	<td align="center">	2.98	</td>	<td align="center">	2.97	</td>	<td align="center">	0.74	</td>	<td align="center">	60	</td>	<td align="center">	81	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Oils-Energy	</td>	<td align="center">	3.01	</td>	<td align="center">	3.02	</td>	<td align="center">	0.94	</td>	<td align="center">	340	</td>	<td align="center">	363	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Business Services	</td>	<td align="center">	3.02	</td>	<td align="center">	3.01	</td>	<td align="center">	1.02	</td>	<td align="center">	50	</td>	<td align="center">	49	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Construction	</td>	<td align="center">	3.05	</td>	<td align="center">	3.18	</td>	<td align="center">	0.44	</td>	<td align="center">	36	</td>	<td align="center">	81	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Conglomerates	</td>	<td align="center">	3.07	</td>	<td align="center">	2.96	</td>	<td align="center">	0.64	</td>	<td align="center">	9	</td>	<td align="center">	14	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Aerospace	</td>	<td align="center">	3.08	</td>	<td align="center">	3.13	</td>	<td align="center">	0.44	</td>	<td align="center">	11	</td>	<td align="center">	25	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Auto-Tires-Trucks	</td>	<td align="center">	3.11	</td>	<td align="center">	3.06	</td>	<td align="center">	0.51	</td>	<td align="center">	21	</td>	<td align="center">	41	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Basic Materials	</td>	<td align="center">	3.13	</td>	<td align="center">	3.10	</td>	<td align="center">	0.71	</td>	<td align="center">	131	</td>	<td align="center">	185	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Industrial Products	</td>	<td align="center">	3.16	</td>	<td align="center">	3.18	</td>	<td align="center">	0.78	</td>	<td align="center">	85	</td>	<td align="center">	109	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Finance	</td>	<td align="center">	3.17	</td>	<td align="center">	3.17	</td>	<td align="center">	0.85	</td>	<td align="center">	454	</td>	<td align="center">	533	</td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#E6F3E7"><td align="left">	Transportation	</td>	<td align="center">	3.30	</td>	<td align="center">	3.25	</td>	<td align="center">	0.40	</td>	<td align="center">	77	</td>	<td align="center">	191	</td></tr>
</table>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<i>Charles Rotblut, CFA, is the senior market analyst for Zacks.com. He can be reached at crotblut@zacks.com.</i>
</p><p>

<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/second-quarter-earnings-outlook-zacks-industry-rank-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alcon Growth Stymied by Economy &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/alcon-growth-stymied-by-economy-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/alcon-growth-stymied-by-economy-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy - Analyst Blog Alcon Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novartis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21341/Alcon+Growth+Stymied+by+Economy+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Alcon, Inc.</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/acl">ACL</a>) faces some challenges in the near future: patent expirations, patent challenges, generic threats, softer pricing on certain of its products and Medicare rebates. Additional near-term challenges come from slower top-line growth due to a weakening economy and negative foreign currency affects.<br /><br />The company also took significant losses on its investment portfolio which, by our calculations, negatively impacted EPS by as much as $0.24 in the fourth quarter and $1.22 for all of 2008. The company has subsequently begun redeeming all investments and expects to be 90% invested in cash-equivalents by mid-2009. This should help reduce or eliminate any further investment losses.<br /><br />However, even in the face of these challenges, the company posted solid operational growth in 2008 and through the first quarter of 2009. Excluding the affect of foreign exchange, sales grew 10% in 2008 and were up 5% in the first quarter of 2009. EPS grew 11% in 2008, and increased 9% in the most recent quarter.<br /><br />While we expect sales growth in 2009 to moderate relative to that realized in 2008 due to a foreign exchange headwind and softening global economies, Alcon's business model remains fundamentally very strong. The company has done an excellent job with cost-control which should continue to benefit operating margins. The recently announced cost-cutting initiative should be fully implemented by the end of 2009 and shave an additional $40 million in annual expenses. This should help offset some of the impact from generic TobraDex, the slowing economy and foreign exchange headwind in 2009.<br /><br />Our model reflects the more challenging operating environment that we expect will persist through the end of 2009. Further into 2010 and beyond, however, we believe Alcon's revenue growth will reaccelerate to an annual rate in the mid-to-high-single digits. EPS should grow faster than revenue as operating leverage improves from cost-control measures and gross margin expansion.<br /><br />Continued international penetration and market share gains will be the fuel for future revenue growth at Alcon. Sales in emerging markets, including China, Russia and India continue to be big contributors to growth. The company generates a significant amount of operating cash flow which we would expect to be reinvested in the form of increased R&#38;D in an effort to restock the company's drug portfolio following certain patent expirations. Cash flow may also be returned to shareholders through another share buyback program which may be initiated now that <span style="font-weight: bold;">Novartis </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/nvs">NVS</a>) has completed the initial purchase of Nestlé's stake in the company.<br /><br />Alcon is already putting some of that cash to work in the form of dividends. The board of directors recently voted in favor of increasing the dividend by 50%, from 2.63 Swiss francs to 3.95 Swiss francs. This equates to a yield of 3.3% at today's share price and exchange rates.<br /><br />We expect EPS to average about 9% annual growth from 2008 through 2012 on a top-line growth rate of about 5%. For 2009, we expect EPS to grow 2% and for revenue to decline 1% due to consumers cutting back on discretionary purchases, foreign exchange and generic competition to TobraDex. We rate the shares a Hold with a $120 price target, representing 19.5x our 2009 EPS estimate of $6.14.  
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=ACL">Read the full analyst report on "ACL"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=NVS">Read the full analyst report on "NVS"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/alcon-growth-stymied-by-economy-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Performer for Wednesday: RehabCare (RHB) &#8211; Zacks #1 Rank Top Performers</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-performer-for-wednesday-rehabcare-rhb-zacks-1-rank-top-performers-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-performer-for-wednesday-rehabcare-rhb-zacks-1-rank-top-performers-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Giaquinto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare management;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HealthSouth Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John H. Short;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LHC Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical rehabilitation programs and therapy services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odyssey HealthCare;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phase 2 Consulting;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-acute care services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premier Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President and CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHB;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapy services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/11236/Top+Performer+for+Wednesday%3A+RehabCare+%28RHB%29+-+Zacks+%231+Rank+Top+Performers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>RehabCare Group, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?t=RHB">RHB</a>), a member of the Medical-Outpatient/Home Care industry, has made the Zacks #1 Rank Top Performers List for Wednesday with a gain of approximately 11%.<p>

<table align="right"><tr><td></td></tr></table>  

There are 3 other companies from this industry on today's <a href="http://www.zacks.com/portfolios/rank/1rank.php">Zacks #1 Rank List</a>: <b>HealthSouth Corp.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?t=HLS">HLS</a>), <b>LHC Group, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?t=LHCG">LHCG</a>) and <b>Odyssey HealthCare</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?t=ODSY">ODSY</a>). (In total, there are 225 stocks on today's Zacks #1 Rank List.) </p><p> 

RHB develops, markets, and manages comprehensive medical rehabilitation programs and therapy services in acute-care hospitals, skilled nursing units and outpatient facilities. The company is associated with 1,200 hospitals and skilled nursing facilities in 42 states. </p><p> 

<b>Good Trend in Earnings Estimates</b></p><p> 

Profit expectations for both this year and next have been climbing higher for weeks. Four covering analysts expect earnings of $1.46 for the year ending December 2009, which is up 12.3% over the past 2 months, including a gain of 3.5% in the past 30 days. </p><p>  

There are only half as many analysts currently looking at the year ending December 2010, but they too have raised forecasts. The consensus of $1.77 is 15.7% higher than 2 months ago and 6% higher than 30 days ago. Furthermore, the forecast for next year is about 21% higher than this year. </p><p>  

<b>RHB Sells Phase 2 Consulting</b></p><p> 

The big news for RHB last week was the sale of Phase 2 Consulting - its healthcare management consulting division - to Premier, Inc. for an undisclosed amount. Proceeds from the sale will be used to further reduce outstanding debt.  </p><p> 

"Given the aging population and the support for bundled Medicare payments building in Washington, we foresee a rapidly expanding demand for our continuum of post-acute care services," said President and CEO John H. Short, Ph.D. "This transaction allows us to focus more of our resources and energies on our core business." </p><p> 

<b>Average Surprise of +33% Over 4 Quarters</b></p><p> 

The company's first-quarter report from May 6 not only helped earnings estimates to rise, but also made RHB the Zacks #1 Rank Top Performer for that day. </p><p> 

Earnings per share of 48 cents beat expectations by more than 50% and contributed to an average surprise of 33% over the past 4 quarters. </p><p>  

Revenues increased 11.6% to $203.4 million in the quarter, versus $182.4 million last year. The company's Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation Services (SRS) division reported a 9.5% increase in operating revenues to $123.1 million. Meanwhile, operating revenues for the Hospital Rehabilitation Services (HRS) division moved higher 7.2%, while operating revenues at the Hospital division advanced 28.6%. </p><p> 
<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-performer-for-wednesday-rehabcare-rhb-zacks-1-rank-top-performers-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Performer for Wednesday: RehabCare (RHB) &#8211; Zacks #1 Rank Top Performers</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-performer-for-wednesday-rehabcare-rhb-zacks-1-rank-top-performers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-performer-for-wednesday-rehabcare-rhb-zacks-1-rank-top-performers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Giaquinto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare management;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HealthSouth Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John H. Short;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LHC Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical rehabilitation programs and therapy services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odyssey HealthCare;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phase 2 Consulting;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-acute care services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premier Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President and CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHB;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapy services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/11236/Top+Performer+for+Wednesday%3A+RehabCare+%28RHB%29+-+Zacks+%231+Rank+Top+Performers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>RehabCare Group, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?t=RHB">RHB</a>), a member of the Medical-Outpatient/Home Care industry, has made the Zacks #1 Rank Top Performers List for Wednesday with a gain of approximately 11%.<p>

<table align="right"><tr><td></td></tr></table>  

There are 3 other companies from this industry on today's <a href="http://www.zacks.com/portfolios/rank/1rank.php">Zacks #1 Rank List</a>: <b>HealthSouth Corp.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?t=HLS">HLS</a>), <b>LHC Group, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?t=LHCG">LHCG</a>) and <b>Odyssey HealthCare</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?t=ODSY">ODSY</a>). (In total, there are 225 stocks on today's Zacks #1 Rank List.) </p><p> 

RHB develops, markets, and manages comprehensive medical rehabilitation programs and therapy services in acute-care hospitals, skilled nursing units and outpatient facilities. The company is associated with 1,200 hospitals and skilled nursing facilities in 42 states. </p><p> 

<b>Good Trend in Earnings Estimates</b></p><p> 

Profit expectations for both this year and next have been climbing higher for weeks. Four covering analysts expect earnings of $1.46 for the year ending December 2009, which is up 12.3% over the past 2 months, including a gain of 3.5% in the past 30 days. </p><p>  

There are only half as many analysts currently looking at the year ending December 2010, but they too have raised forecasts. The consensus of $1.77 is 15.7% higher than 2 months ago and 6% higher than 30 days ago. Furthermore, the forecast for next year is about 21% higher than this year. </p><p>  

<b>RHB Sells Phase 2 Consulting</b></p><p> 

The big news for RHB last week was the sale of Phase 2 Consulting - its healthcare management consulting division - to Premier, Inc. for an undisclosed amount. Proceeds from the sale will be used to further reduce outstanding debt.  </p><p> 

"Given the aging population and the support for bundled Medicare payments building in Washington, we foresee a rapidly expanding demand for our continuum of post-acute care services," said President and CEO John H. Short, Ph.D. "This transaction allows us to focus more of our resources and energies on our core business." </p><p> 

<b>Average Surprise of +33% Over 4 Quarters</b></p><p> 

The company's first-quarter report from May 6 not only helped earnings estimates to rise, but also made RHB the Zacks #1 Rank Top Performer for that day. </p><p> 

Earnings per share of 48 cents beat expectations by more than 50% and contributed to an average surprise of 33% over the past 4 quarters. </p><p>  

Revenues increased 11.6% to $203.4 million in the quarter, versus $182.4 million last year. The company's Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation Services (SRS) division reported a 9.5% increase in operating revenues to $123.1 million. Meanwhile, operating revenues for the Hospital Rehabilitation Services (HRS) division moved higher 7.2%, while operating revenues at the Hospital division advanced 28.6%. </p><p> 
<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/top-performer-for-wednesday-rehabcare-rhb-zacks-1-rank-top-performers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Community Health Systems Inc., Universal Health Services Inc., Merck &amp; Co., Inc., Schering-Plough and Johnson &amp; Johnson. &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-community-health-systems-inc-universal-health-services-inc-merck-co-inc-schering-plough-and-johnson-johnson-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-community-health-systems-inc-universal-health-services-inc-merck-co-inc-schering-plough-and-johnson-johnson-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Health Systems Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher margin behavioral services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketed products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimal product;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outpatient services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schering Plough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singulair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Health Services Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21101/Zacks+Analyst+Blog+Highlights%3A+Community+Health+Systems+Inc.%2C+Universal+Health+Services+Inc.%2C+Merck+%26+Co.%2C+Inc.%2C+Schering-Plough+and+Johnson+%26+Johnson.+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>For Immediate Release</b> 
<p align="left">Chicago, IL - June 16, 2009 - Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: <b>Community Health Systems Inc. </b>(<a href="void(0)">CYH</a>), <b>Universal Health Services Inc.</b> (<a href="void(0)">UHS</a>), <b>Merck &#38; Co., Inc.</b> (<a href="void(0)">MRK</a>), <b>Schering-Plough </b>(<a href="void(0)">SGP</a>) and <b>Johnson &#38; Johnson </b>(<a href="void(0)">JNJ</a>). </p>
<p align="left">Get the most recent insight from Zacks Equity Research with the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513</a> </p>
<p align="left"><b>Here are highlights from Monday's Analyst Blog: </b></p>
<p align="left"><b>Cuts in Healthcare Spending </b></p>
<p align="left">The actual breakdown of the $313 billion proposed cuts includes: $110 billion in productivity adjustments to Medicare payment updates; $106 billion in reduced hospital subsidies for treating the uninsured as coverage increases; $75 billion from Medicare Part D drugs; and, $22 billion from "Other." </p>
<p align="left">The President added that these measures would extend the solvency of Medicare's Hospital Insurance Trust Fund by seven years to about 2024, and reduce beneficiary premiums for physician and outpatient services by about $43 billion over the next 10 years. As Congress continues to draft legislation, it remains to be seen whether the government will take a position or gain the necessary support for a "public fund" option. </p>
<p align="left">We currently rate both our hospital operators, <b>Community Health Systems Inc. </b>(<a href="void(0)">CYH</a>) and <b>Universal Health Services Inc.</b> (<a href="void(0)">UHS</a>), with Hold recommendations. Nonetheless, our preferred exposure in the sector would be in UHS given its relatively well-diversified revenue mix and the growing contribution of higher margin behavioral services. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Merck Needs Schering-Plough</b> </p>
<p align="left">Based on our earnings model, we expect <b>Merck &#38; Co., Inc.</b> (<a href="void(0)">MRK</a>) to post flat EPS growth from 2008 - 2013 due to the combination of patent expirations of key drugs, recent pipeline failures and softening sales of Gardasil and Singulair. </p>
<p align="left">The proposed merger with <b>Schering-Plough </b>(<a href="void(0)">SGP</a>) is clearly an attempt to address Merck's slowing sales and EPS growth. Schering-Plough has relatively little exposure to patent cliffs through 2013 and possesses one of the strongest late-stage pipelines in big-pharma. </p>
<p align="left">The deal will add immediate synergies relative to the Vytorin/Zetia joint venture and should offer little overlap in currently marketed products and pipeline compounds. Given the minimal product overlap and relative ease in combining the cholesterol business, we would expect the combination to provide significant synergistic opportunities with combining sales, marketing, research and other back-office functions. </p>
<p align="left">The merger is expected to be slightly accretive to non-GAAP EPS in the first full year, and significantly accretive afterwards. Merck believes that the merger will result in non-GAAP EPS annual growth in the high-single digits from 2009 - 2013 (using Merck's stand-alone non-GAAP EPS as the 2009 base). This is premised on producing $3.5 billion in annual cost savings but apparently not dependent, according to Merck, on retaining rights to Remicade and golimumab. </p>
<p align="left">Given that we model combined sales of both drugs to be over $3.5 billion in 2013, we are skeptical that their guidance is reasonable if they lose the ex-U.S. rights to both compounds. </p>
<p align="left">The merger is expected to close in the fourth quarter. We believe it's in Merck's best interests to get the deal done, notwithstanding potentially material concessions to <b>Johnson &#38; Johnson </b>(<a href="void(0)">JNJ</a>) relative to rights to Remicade and golimumab. </p>
<p align="left"></p>
<p align="left">Want more from Zacks Equity Research? Subscribe to the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515</a>. </p>
<p align="left"><b>About Zacks Equity Research</b> </p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term. </p>
<p align="left">Continuous coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons. </p>
<p align="left">Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517</a> </p>
<p align="left"><b>About Zacks </b></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518</a>. </p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release. </p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/ZacksInvestment">http://twitter.com/ZacksInvestment</a> </p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a> </p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security. </p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />Mark Vickery<br />Web Content Editor<br />312-265-9380<br />Visit: <a href="http://www.zacks.com/blog/www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a><br /></p>
<p align="left"></p>
<p align="left"></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-community-health-systems-inc-universal-health-services-inc-merck-co-inc-schering-plough-and-johnson-johnson-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sun Healthcare (NASDAQ:SUNH): Upgraded to Outperform at Leerink Swann</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/sun-healthcare-nasdaqsunh-upgraded-to-outperform-at-leerink-swann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/sun-healthcare-nasdaqsunh-upgraded-to-outperform-at-leerink-swann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform proposals;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leerink Swann;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reimbursement concerns;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Healthcare;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-1484324865052868453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"Leerink Swann is upgrading span style="font-weight: bold;"Sun Healthcare (NASDAQ:SUNH)/span to Outperform from Market Perform with a valuation range of $13-$14.br /br /Firm believes the stock has been oversold on reimbursement concerns and the recent restatement at peer SKH. They believe that SUNH has significant organic margin expansion opportunities over the next couple of years and can continue to grow EPS even if Medicare rates are cut modestly.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Reimbursement and Reform Concerns./span The recent weakness in SUNH shares mainly reflects fear about potential Medicare rate cuts andbundling under healthcare reform. In early May, CMS proposed a FY10 Medicare payment cut of 1.2% for SNFs. Further, most of the healthcare reform proposals call for bundling some post acute-care payments with hospital payments, which reduces longer-term pricing visibility.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Visibility Should Slowly Improve. /spanFinal FY10 SNF (skilled nursing facility) Medicare rule is to be released by early August, and although Leerink is not expecting significant improvement, a few proposals could be clarified or softened. In the past, CMS has used proposed rules to float controversial changes that are often removed from the final rule. Also, while the impact of bundling is unknown, implementation is not likely for many years, giving the industry time to reduce some of the uncertainty.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"SUNH Can Grow EPS Even with Rate Cut./span Leerink believes SUNH will be able to grow EPS in 2010, even if Medicare rates are cut slightly, through continued rollout of more Rehab Recovery Suites and improvements in patient mix. SUNH facilities with rehab suites have margins 150 bps higher than those without rehab suites. SUNH ended 1Q09 with 48 suites, and the company plans on having 70 open by YE09.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Recent Results Solid./span 1Q09 skilled mix and pricing growth were strong, and SUNH generated good cash flow, and reduced debt. Skilled mix was 20.8% and Medicare Part A per diems increased 9% -- both the highest SUNH has reported to date and reflective of its ability to increasingly service higher acuity patients.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls/span: SUNH is one volatile stock and I suspect Leerink's call will cause it to trade up significantly.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"I'm guessing 7-10% upside move maybe in store./spanbr /br /What caught my eye was Leerink's comments on how SUNH would be able to grow EPS even with the Medicare rate cuts. Mind you, SUNH is trading around 6x fwd EPS.br //divdiv class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29297569-1484324865052868453?l=notablecalls.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/sun-healthcare-nasdaqsunh-upgraded-to-outperform-at-leerink-swann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuts in Healthcare Spending &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/cuts-in-healthcare-spending-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/cuts-in-healthcare-spending-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Health Systems Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher margin behavioral services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outpatient services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Health Services Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21065/Cuts+in+Healthcare+Spending+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />On Saturday June 13, 2009, President Obama announced new Medicare and Medicaid spending cuts aimed at reducing government spending by an additional $313 billion over 10 years to pay for healthcare reform. The amount will be in addition to the $635 billion "downpayment" included in his FY 2010 Budget.<br /><br />The actual breakdown of the $313 billion proposed cuts includes: $110 billion in productivity adjustments to Medicare payment updates; $106 billion in reduced hospital subsidies for treating the uninsured as coverage increases; $75 billion from Medicare Part D drugs; and, $22 billion from "Other."<br /><br />The President added that these measures would extend the solvency of Medicare's Hospital Insurance Trust Fund by seven years to about 2024, and reduce beneficiary premiums for physician and outpatient services by about $43 billion over the next 10 years. As Congress continues to draft legislation, it remains to be seen whether the government will take a position or gain the necessary support for a "public fund" option.<br /><br />We currently rate both our hospital operators, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Community Health Systems Inc.</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cyh">CYH</a>) and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Universal Health Services Inc.</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/uhs">UHS</a>), with Hold recommendations. Nonetheless, our preferred exposure in the sector would be in UHS given its relatively well-diversified revenue mix and the growing contribution of higher margin behavioral services.
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CYH">Read the full analyst report on "CYH"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UHS">Read the full analyst report on "UHS"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/cuts-in-healthcare-spending-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UnitedHealth Group (NYSE:UNH): Downgraded to Underperform at Oppenheimer</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/unitedhealth-group-nyseunh-downgraded-to-underperform-at-oppenheimer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/unitedhealth-group-nyseunh-downgraded-to-underperform-at-oppenheimer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitedhealth Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-4338105785718932096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"Oppenheimer is downgrading span style="font-weight: bold;"UnitedHealth Group (NYSE:UNH) /spanto Underperform from Perform, and reducing their price target from $32 to $24.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Firm notes it's come to their attention that United is relying on a very aggressive Medicare bidding strategy in 2010 that will likely result in significant Medicare margin compression. /spanUnited's bid assumes that physician costs will fall 21% next year, and that if a Medicare doctor payment fix occurs this year (likely), that plan reimbursement will be adjusted accordingly (very unlikely). Most other big Medicare plans in the industry are resigned to Medicare rates falling about 5% in 2010, versus an expected cost trend increase of 5%, and have reduced benefits accordingly. 2010 EPS projection is down $0.30, to $3.00.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"If this goes against United, in a worst-case scenario, it will negatively impact operating earnings by almost $800 million, or $0.45 per share. /spanEnrollment growth will offset a portion of this hit, but it will be difficult for United to show any meaningful EPS growth in 2010, even with a lot of share repurchase.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"The issue here is timing./span Congress isn't planning on passing health reform legislation until early September, which is probably aggressive. Either way, it will be far too late for CMS to adjust reimbursement, since the 2010 Medicare marketing season begins on October 1.br /br /Therefore, 2010 will be United's third consecutive year of declining operating earnings, which will make it difficult for the company to sustain its industry-leading multiple, particularly since the market currently believes next year is when all of United's pieces will fall back into place. It doesn't appear that will be the case.br /br /While the firm doesn't believe there is an enormous amount of downside to United's stock, as it already trades at less than 9x, they believe there are far more attractive opportunities in the group, like WellPoint, which will benefit from rising EPS projections over the next six months and trades at a lower multiple than UNH.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"The implications for the other large Medicare plans in the industry are not positive./span Because of this strategy, United will likely be offering far better benefits than most other plans, which will make it more difficult for competitors to grow and retain membership.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls:/span UNH will likely get hit on this. why?br /br /- First of all, it's a downgrade to Underperform. That always creates selling pressure. The stock is way up from its $16-$17 lows just 4 months ago.br /br /- Cramerica has been all negative on the HMO's telling people to sell/short the whole group on heels of Obamas' healthcare reform. The downgrade validates his thesis.br /br /- The chart kind of looks like the stock is headed lower here.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"How low will it go?/spanbr /br /This comes down to some math and gut feel. $0.30 in EPS x 9x estimate gives you $2.70 in potential valuation adjusted downside. span style="font-weight: bold;"Knowing UNH does not move that big I'm guessing $1.50-$2.00 is how much the stock will be down today./spanbr /br /Let's see how right or wrong I am with this one./divdiv class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29297569-4338105785718932096?l=notablecalls.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/unitedhealth-group-nyseunh-downgraded-to-underperform-at-oppenheimer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UnitedHealth Group (NYSE:UNH): Downgraded to Underperform at Oppenheimer</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/unitedhealth-group-nyseunh-downgraded-to-underperform-at-oppenheimer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/unitedhealth-group-nyseunh-downgraded-to-underperform-at-oppenheimer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notable Calls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitedhealth Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29297569.post-4338105785718932096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div style="text-align: justify;"Oppenheimer is downgrading span style="font-weight: bold;"UnitedHealth Group (NYSE:UNH) /spanto Underperform from Perform, and reducing their price target from $32 to $24.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"Firm notes it's come to their attention that United is relying on a very aggressive Medicare bidding strategy in 2010 that will likely result in significant Medicare margin compression. /spanUnited's bid assumes that physician costs will fall 21% next year, and that if a Medicare doctor payment fix occurs this year (likely), that plan reimbursement will be adjusted accordingly (very unlikely). Most other big Medicare plans in the industry are resigned to Medicare rates falling about 5% in 2010, versus an expected cost trend increase of 5%, and have reduced benefits accordingly. 2010 EPS projection is down $0.30, to $3.00.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"If this goes against United, in a worst-case scenario, it will negatively impact operating earnings by almost $800 million, or $0.45 per share. /spanEnrollment growth will offset a portion of this hit, but it will be difficult for United to show any meaningful EPS growth in 2010, even with a lot of share repurchase.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"The issue here is timing./span Congress isn't planning on passing health reform legislation until early September, which is probably aggressive. Either way, it will be far too late for CMS to adjust reimbursement, since the 2010 Medicare marketing season begins on October 1.br /br /Therefore, 2010 will be United's third consecutive year of declining operating earnings, which will make it difficult for the company to sustain its industry-leading multiple, particularly since the market currently believes next year is when all of United's pieces will fall back into place. It doesn't appear that will be the case.br /br /While the firm doesn't believe there is an enormous amount of downside to United's stock, as it already trades at less than 9x, they believe there are far more attractive opportunities in the group, like WellPoint, which will benefit from rising EPS projections over the next six months and trades at a lower multiple than UNH.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"The implications for the other large Medicare plans in the industry are not positive./span Because of this strategy, United will likely be offering far better benefits than most other plans, which will make it more difficult for competitors to grow and retain membership.br /br /span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"Notablecalls:/span UNH will likely get hit on this. why?br /br /- First of all, it's a downgrade to Underperform. That always creates selling pressure. The stock is way up from its $16-$17 lows just 4 months ago.br /br /- Cramerica has been all negative on the HMO's telling people to sell/short the whole group on heels of Obamas' healthcare reform. The downgrade validates his thesis.br /br /- The chart kind of looks like the stock is headed lower here.br /br /span style="font-weight: bold;"How low will it go?/spanbr /br /This comes down to some math and gut feel. $0.30 in EPS x 9x estimate gives you $2.70 in potential valuation adjusted downside. span style="font-weight: bold;"Knowing UNH does not move that big I'm guessing $1.50-$2.00 is how much the stock will be down today./spanbr /br /Let's see how right or wrong I am with this one./divdiv class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29297569-4338105785718932096?l=notablecalls.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/unitedhealth-group-nyseunh-downgraded-to-underperform-at-oppenheimer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Are They Laughing at Timmy…And How Will it Affect Your Wealth?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-china/why-are-they-laughing-at-timmy%e2%80%a6and-how-will-it-affect-your-wealth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-china/why-are-they-laughing-at-timmy%e2%80%a6and-how-will-it-affect-your-wealth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dishonest accounting trick;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Herring;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money-printing operations;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off-balance sheet accounting;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peking University in Beijing;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing dollars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite corporations;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy  Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldcom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pChinese business and social culture are generally very subdued and conservative… and above all, respectful. But students at Peking University in Beijing just couldn’t help themselves this week.U.S. Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner traveled to China, hat in hand, to allay the concerns of our biggest creditor about the soaring budget deficit and Washington’s loose monetary policy. And by loose, I mean that we are rapidly printing the dollar into worthlessness./p
pIn a speech before the student body, Lil’ Timmy told those gathered that Chinese dollar holdings and investments in U.S. debt were safe and that the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve are committed to a strong dollar policy./p
pHa! That’s a good one. And the Chinese students let him know it, with#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-china/why-are-they-laughing-at-timmy%e2%80%a6and-how-will-it-affect-your-wealth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bong King Gross Says Ditch the Dollar Before It’s Too Late</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/bong-king-gross-says-ditch-the-dollar-before-it%e2%80%99s-too-late/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/bong-king-gross-says-ditch-the-dollar-before-it%e2%80%99s-too-late/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adolf Hitler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill gross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bong King;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Miner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ernie Ford;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Says Ditch;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Says;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow motion car crash;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Blackstone Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div
p class="MsoNormal"We spent the morning musing on the Maginot  Line. The French  built this elaborate line of fortifications along its border with Germany in the  1930s to thwart an invasion by its Great War enemy. When Germany invaded France  in May 1940, Adolf Hitler’s armies simply bypassed the line and invaded France  through neighbouring Belgium. The Maginot Line proved to be an elaborate  dud.br /
/p
p class="MsoNormal"
/pp class="MsoNormal"As Nassim Taleb points out in his book emThe Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly  Improbable/em:/p
p class="MsoNormal"
/pp class="MsoNormal"The story of the Maginot Line shows how we are  conditioned to be specific. The French, after the Great War, build a wall along  the previous German invasion route to prevent reinvasion – Hitler just (almost)  effortlessly went around it. The French#8230;/p/div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/bong-king-gross-says-ditch-the-dollar-before-it%e2%80%99s-too-late/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wednesday’s Market Recap (06/03/09)</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/wednesday%e2%80%99s-market-recap-060309/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/wednesday%e2%80%99s-market-recap-060309/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bullish Bankers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullish bankers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Petredis;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude oil storage inventories;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy equities;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Budget committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq Composite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil tankers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullishbankers.com/?p=14232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The markets finally took a long deserved breather today, but not before rallying near the closing bell to cut the days losses in half.  The Dow Jones Industrial average was down 65.63 to 8,675.24 for a loss of 0.75% on the day.  The Nasdaq Composite and Standard and Poor&#8217;s 500 lost 10.88 and 12.98 respectively [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/wednesday%e2%80%99s-market-recap-060309/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed Chairman Speaks, Stocks Fall</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/fed-chairman-speaks-stocks-fall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/fed-chairman-speaks-stocks-fall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank asset troubles;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Budget committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QVM Group LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SS;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qvmgroup.com/invest/?p=4491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testified before the House Budget Committee Wednesday calling for fiscal balance and voiced the need to limit debt issuance, presenting a less than rosy picture, including a projected $1.8 Trillion federal budget deficit and rising Treasury interest rates over concerns about the deficit.  He said the Fed has limits and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/fed-chairman-speaks-stocks-fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aetna Drops Guidance 30 Cents &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/aetna-drops-guidance-30-cents-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/aetna-drops-guidance-30-cents-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Zubretsky;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20708/Aetna+Drops+Guidance+30+Cents+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">FY09 EPS guidance revised downwards</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Aetna</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aet">AET</a>) announced yesterday that it was revising its 2009 operating earnings per share guidance from a range of $3.85 to $3.95 to a range of $3.55 to $3.70. The primary drivers of the revised guidance according to management were: a continuation of higher projected Commercial medical costs; and lower projected 2009 Medicare revenue, reflecting an updated view of the risk profile of the Medicare book of business.<br /><br />On a call to analysts, Aetna's chief financial officer, Joseph Zubretsky, added that the problem wasn't so much the result of more members seeking medical care but that those who did were receiving more tests and treatments.<br /><br />Aetna, Inc. is one the largest (in terms of members), and most diversified health insurers in the U.S. The company recently reported 1Q09 net income of $437.8M (up 1% y/y), or EPS of $0.96, compared with net income and EPS of $431.6M and $0.92 respectively in 1Q08. A highlight of the result was a 9% y/y increase in medical membership. Notwithstanding the higher-than-projected medical costs in commercial products, we regarded the quarter's financial results to be broadly inline with our expectations.<br /><br />Nonetheless, the revised guidance is consistent with the higher 1Q09 consolidated medical loss ratio of 83% (up 120bps sequentially) and points to potential issues of premium pricing mismatch. Our view on the stock remains unchanged with a Hold rating at current levels.
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/aetna-drops-guidance-30-cents-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company News for June 3, 2009 &#8211; Corporate Summary</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-june-3-2009-corporate-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-june-3-2009-corporate-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joy Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tengzhong;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valero Energy;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams Sonoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20701/Company+News+for+June+3%2C+2009+-+Corporate+Summary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify">* Valero Energy (NYSE:VLO) announced plans to offer 40 million common shares with the option for an additional 6 million shares</p>
<p align="justify">* China's Tengzhong and General Motors (OTC:GMGMQ) affirmed talks regarding sale of the Hummer brand</p>
<p align="justify">* Aetna (NYSE:AET) lowered its 2009 earnings forecast, citing higher medical costs from its commercial plans and lower-than-estimated revenues from its Medicare business. The firm dropped its 2009 operating earnings guidance to $3.55 to $3.70 a share, from its prior view of $3.85 to $3.95 a share.</p>
<p align="justify">* Williams-Sonoma (NYSE:WSM) reported a fiscal first quarter loss of 14 cents per share, beating estimates by 7 cents a share, as revenues plunged 21.7% year-over-year to $612 million. The firm issued inline revenue guidance of $2.81 billion to $2.93 billion, versus the Street estimates of $2.87 billion</p>
<p align="justify">* Joy Global (NASDAQ:JOYG) reported fiscal second quarter earnings of $1.17 per share, beating estimates by 28 cents, as revenues jumped 9.6% year-over-year to $924 million. The firm issued upside guidance of $3.80 to $4.00 per share, but lowered its 2009 revenue view to $3.5 billion to $3.6 billion</p>
<p align="justify">* Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) upgraded JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM) shares, raising the 2009 earnings estimate to $1.79 a share from $1.74 and versus the Street's $1.50, as well as for 2010 to $3.81 from $3.63, compared to consensus estimates of $2.73</p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/company-news-for-june-3-2009-corporate-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LHCG Group. &#8211; Aggressive Growth &#8211; Zacks Rank Buy</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/lhcg-group-aggressive-growth-zacks-rank-buy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/lhcg-group-aggressive-growth-zacks-rank-buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare group;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospice services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LHCG Group;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LHGC;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-acute healthcare services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Rank Buy LHC Group;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/11079/LHCG+Group.+-+Aggressive+Growth+-+Zacks+Rank+Buy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>LHC Group.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/LHCG">LHCG</a>) has been growing its home-based services rapidly, leading to a 49% increase in revenues. The healthcare group has a spotless earnings history. 



<p ALIGN="left">
<b>Company Description</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
LHC serves Medicare beneficiaries in the southern U.S. with post-acute healthcare services. In addition to home health care the company provides hospice services through facilities as well as long-term care hospital and rehab clinics. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Another Great Quarter</b>

</p><p ALIGN="left">
LHC released first-quarter results on May 6 that included a 49% increase in net revenue to $125 million, from $84 million last year. Revenues generated through home-based services lead the way with a 60% increase to $109 million, up from $68 million. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Earnings per share beat estimates by a double-digit percentage once again. EPS was $0.62, 29% higher than the forecasted $0.48. Net income was also more than double the $0.30 earned in the same quarter last year. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Bullish Guidance, Estimates Up&#60;/b?
<p ALIGN="left">
After the company raised the median of its revenue guidance to $505 million, from $490, analysts began raising full-year earnings estimates. Since the report was released 9 out of 10 analysts have raised current year guidance, bringing the consensus to $2.24, up from $2.09. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The current year projection would yield earnings growth of 30%. Next year's consensus of $2.40 would be a growth rate of 7%. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Great Valuations</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Not only does the company have great growth projections, but shares are trading at a good value as well. Currently the stock is valued at 12 times trailing earnings and less than 11 times forward earnings. The PEG ration is just 0.6. 



</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>The Chart</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">

Shares of LHGC have been quite volatile due to political risk regarding Medicare spending, however the company maintains a spotless track record when it comes to earnings. Take a look at the chart below. 

</p><p ALIGN="left">
<img src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1243973004.JPG"/><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p></b></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/lhcg-group-aggressive-growth-zacks-rank-buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Rising Long-Term Bond Yields Mean for Your Money</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/what-rising-long-term-bond-yields-mean-for-your-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/what-rising-long-term-bond-yields-mean-for-your-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; font-family: Verdana;"Yields on long-term US Treasurys have risen by about 167 basis points over the last five months. This translates to a jump of about 81% over the same period./p
p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"This may seem overly complicated or even irrelevant to many readers. After all, stocks continue to climb. And the mainstream press continues to focus on the economy’s “green shoots.” So who cares what’s happening in the bond markets?/p
p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"Well, we do. And you should, too, if you want to know how the government’s economic ‘fix’ is really developing. /p
p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"Long-term bond yields are generally seen as a benchmark for long-term interest rates. This means the bond markets act as a check against government profligacy. If yields go too high, it would seriously complicate further#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/what-rising-long-term-bond-yields-mean-for-your-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best Way to Trade Stocks Right Now</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-best-way-to-trade-stocks-right-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-best-way-to-trade-stocks-right-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equities trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naufal Sanaullah;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheila Bair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"A free market no longer existsstrong. /strongThe government’s multi-trillion attempt to ‘fix’ the recession has dealt whatever was left of a free market a death blow. And the scam-financed rally in US stocks off March lows shows that the government is able to pull off an impressive shift in the markets despite a slew of appalling economic data points./p
p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"Take a bow, Mr Geithner… Well done, Mr Bernanke… Hats off, Mr Obama#8230; You want us to believe that banks are recovering, housing has bottomed, stimulus works and borrowing leads to prosperity. And so far, you’ve mostly got your way. /p
p style="margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt;"As economic commentator James Quinn put it recently on PrudentBear.com, Obama, Geithner and Bernanke, aided and abetted by Sheila Bair, Barney Frank#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-best-way-to-trade-stocks-right-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Dollar Roadblock!</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-dollar-roadblock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-dollar-roadblock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Byron King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HKD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Mathias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koruna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSCI Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peking  University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLN;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Reserve Bank of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ty;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Under& The Reserve Bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usa Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.dailyreckoning;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p Euro goes back and forth over 1.42#8230;Geithner make another promise to China#8230;RBA leaves rates unchanged#8230;The Mogambo on a Tuesday! And Now#8230; Today#8217;s Pfennig!/p
pGood day#8230; And a Terrific Tuesday to you! Well#8230; The currencies, led by the euro, ran into a dollar road block yesterday, not once, not twice, but three times#8230; The first two times the euro traded over the 1.42 figure, it fell back, but recovered to again try to remain over 1.42#8230; It was a classic case of profit taking at a line of resistance#8230; But the third time, was no charm for the euro, and thus it ended the day and night sessions below 1.42#8230; But hey! Has this run from 1.2578 on March 1st, been something#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-dollar-roadblock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Market Just Likes News</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/this-market-just-likes-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/this-market-just-likes-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accrual accounting;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash-based accounting;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piggy-bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing         press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-world accounting;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy  Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yu Yongding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pThe US stock market is enjoying one of those delightful episodes when all news is good news. The Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped 221 points yesterday to 8,721 - lifting the Blue Chip index to within a whisker of a positive year-to-date performance./p
pLet’s give credit for the rally to good news… and also to bad news, because that’s also good news. In fact, let’s just give credit to news in general./p
pTopping yesterday’s headlines was the “news” that General Motors (NYSE:a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=GM"GM/a) had formerly declared bankruptcy. The automaker’s de facto bankruptcy of the last several years finally yielded to the de jure variety. That’s good news, because now we taxpayers get the chance to increase our charitable giving. We get the opportunity#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/this-market-just-likes-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Share of the US Debt</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/your-share-of-the-us-debt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/your-share-of-the-us-debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Byron King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher energy prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Mathias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peking  University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real precious metal story;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richebächer Society;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Parenteau;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usa Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yellow metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yu Yongding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pBonds down. Gold up $17. Someone seems to think there is a whiff of inflation in the air. Sniff…sniff…./p
pWe’re not so sure. It seems too early to us./p
pBut we’re not even going to think about it. Today, we’ve got to make tracks. We’re traveling./p
pstrongIn light of our voyage we’re turning today’s essay over to guest host Ian Mathias, of Agora Financial’s ema title="The 5 Minute Forecast" href="http://www.agorafinancial.com/5min/"5 Min. Forecast/a/em. He’ll take over from here…/strong/p
pYour family’s share of the government debt is now over half a million dollars. A record $546,668, to be exact./p
pThat cheery Monday stat comes courtesy of a emUSA Today/em study, which claims that each American family’s share rose 12% in 2008. That’s $55,000 in new government debt last year for every US household#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/your-share-of-the-us-debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Industry Outlook Highlights: BioScrip, Inc., WellPoint and NovaMed Inc. &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-industry-outlook-highlights-bioscrip-inc-wellpoint-and-novamed-inc-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-industry-outlook-highlights-bioscrip-inc-wellpoint-and-novamed-inc-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 - Zacks.com;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BioScrip Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Kallos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical management services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information technology platforms;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nova;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NovaMed Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmacy benefit management;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20572/Zacks+Industry+Outlook+Highlights%3A+BioScrip%2C+Inc.%2C+WellPoint+and+NovaMed+Inc.+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For Immediate Release 
<p align="left">Chicago, IL - May 29, 2009 - Zacks.com releases the latest Industry Outlook. Today's interview is with senior analyst Chris Kallos, who talks about the Healthcare Industry, including <b>BioScrip, Inc.</b> (<a href="void(0)">BIOS</a>), <b>WellPoint</b> (<a href="void(0)">WLP</a>) and <b>NovaMed Inc.</b> (<a href="void(0)">NOVA</a>). </p>
<p align="left">A synopsis of today's Industry Outlook is presented below. The full article can be read at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=2678">http://at.zacks.com/?id=2678</a>. </p>
<p align="left">Health technology holds promise of improved operating efficiencies for many parts of the healthcare industry, hospitals included. However, in the short term those that stand to benefit the most from the stimulus are the companies whose business models are based on information technology platforms. </p>
<p align="left">One such company is <b>BioScrip, Inc.</b> (<a href="void(0)">BIOS</a>) , a specialty pharmacy services provider and pharmacy benefit manager. Bioscrip operates two interrelated business segments, namely: Specialty Services, which is comprised of specialty pharmacy distribution and clinical management services; and PBM Services, which is comprised of pharmacy benefit management and traditional mail services. We currently rate the stock of BioScrip a Buy. </p>
<p align="left">Despite our currently neutral stance on managed care providers overall, we continue to rate <b>WellPoint</b> (<a href="void(0)">WLP</a>) as a Buy given its broad product offering, geographic reach and potential for added synergy gains from relatively recent acquisitions. That said, we believe the recent action by CMS to suspend the company from enrolling new patients in the health insurance Medicare Advantage plan and the prescription drug benefit, Medicare Part D will add to negative sentiment in the short term. We believe the action by CMS is reversible and highlights operational issues that can be addressed by management in the short term. </p>
<p align="left">Another current Buy recommendation is <b>NovaMed Inc.</b> (<a href="void(0)">NOVA</a>). NOVA is an emerging healthcare services company engaged in the operation of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and the provision of optical products and services to eye-care professionals. We remain positive with the company's performance to date, given the continued strength of cash flows from operations and same facility revenue growth. </p>
<p>Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today by visiting: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=2679">http://at.zacks.com/?id=2679</a>.</p>
<p style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">About Zacks </p>
<p>The performance of the Zacks Rank portfolios shown above for annual and year-to-date periods are the linked monthly total returns (price changes + dividends) of equal weighted hypothetical portfolios, consisting of those stocks with the indicated Zacks Rank, assuming monthly rebalancing and zero transaction costs. These are not the returns of actual portfolios. The hypothetical portfolios were created at the beginning of each month from Jan 1988 forward based on the values of the Zacks Rank available to Zacks' clients before the beginning of each month.</p>
<p>The portfolios created monthly from 1988 through September 2006 exclude ADRS and are comprised of stocks that have the indicated Zacks Rank and were covered by at least two analysts at the time of the stocks inclusion in the portfolio. Starting in October 2006 and going forward, the portfolios are comprised of all stocks with the indicated Zacks Rank and do not exclude ADRs, which is more reflective of the list of stocks that customers will find on the Zacks web sites. 2007 returns are for the period of Jan 1 - Jun 30, 2007. These performance numbers have been audited from 1995 through 2003 by Autschuler Melovan, a division of American Express Financial.</p>Contact:<br />Mark Vickery<br />Web Content Editor<br />312-265-9380<br />Visit: www.zacks.com<br />
<p align="left"></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-industry-outlook-highlights-bioscrip-inc-wellpoint-and-novamed-inc-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare Industry &#8211; Industry Outlook</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-industry-industry-outlook-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-industry-industry-outlook-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BioScrip Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical management services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Health Systems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information technology platforms;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nova;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NovaMed Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmacy benefit management;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned healthcare spending;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncertainties surrounding healthcare reform;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Health Services Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/11033/Healthcare+Industry+-+Industry+Outlook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investor sentiment in healthcare continues to be driven by both Washington and the state of the broader economy.
<p>
In late February, President Obama released his administration's first budget proposal, which included the provision of a $630B reserve fund for healthcare reform over the next 10 years, financed in part by increases in taxes and changes to government program payments for physicians, hospitals and insurers (Medicare Advantage in particular). Details of the measure continue to evolve as discussions continue at the congressional level.
</p><p>
Earlier in February, the $787B economic stimulus package was passed in the Senate and House. The $150B in planned healthcare spending will include $25B towards the expansion of COBRA, $20B for health technology, and $85B for Medicaid assistance to states. The package clearly aims to improve the infrastructure of the healthcare industry and ultimately lower costs and expand access to more Americans.
</p><p><b>
OPPORTUNITIES
 </b></p><p>
Health technology holds promise of improved operating efficiencies for many parts of the healthcare industry, hospitals included. However, in the short term those that stand to benefit the most from the stimulus are the companies whose business models are based on information technology platforms.
</p><p>
One such company is <b>BioScrip, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BIOS">BIOS</a>)</b>, a specialty pharmacy services provider and pharmacy benefit manager. Bioscrip operates two interrelated business segments, namely: Specialty Services, which is comprised of specialty pharmacy distribution and clinical management services; and PBM Services, which is comprised of pharmacy benefit management and traditional mail services. We currently rate the stock of Bioscip a Buy. 
</p><p>
Despite our currently neutral stance on managed care providers overall, we continue to rate <b>WellPoint (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/WLP">WLP</a>)</b> as a Buy given its broad product offering, geographic reach and potential for added synergy gains from relatively recent acquisitions. That said, we believe the recent action by CMS to suspend the company from enrolling new patients in the health insurance Medicare Advantage plan and the prescription drug benefit, Medicare Part D will add to negative sentiment in the short term. We believe the action by CMS is reversible and highlights operational issues that can be addressed by management in the short term.
 </p><p>
Another current Buy recommendation is <b>NovaMed Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/NOVA">NOVA</a>)</b>. NOVA is an emerging healthcare services company engaged in the operation of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and the provision of optical products and services to eye-care professionals. We remain positive with the company's performance to date, given the continued strength of cash flows from operations and same facility revenue growth.
 </p><p><b>
WEAKNESSES
 </b></p><p>
Medicaid-focused managed care providers are, to some degree, countercyclical and often perform well in mild recessions. However, and despite the $85B allocated to Medicaid in the stimulus, we remain cautious at this point, given the severity of the current economic downturn and uncertainties surrounding healthcare reform. Unlike other managed care players, Medicaid managed-care companies are highly reliant on funding from state governments, which in turn are subject to budgetary constraints and policy changes at the federal level.
</p><p>
We expect hospitals to gain some relief from the $15B in Medicaid assistance earmarked for immediate distribution to help close budget gaps coupled with the expansion of COBRA. COBRA provides temporary continuation of health coverage in the event of a job loss.
</p><p>
However, we believe the hospital sector will remain under pressure for the remainder of 2009 given anticipated lower consumer spending, high unemployment, and shifts in payer mix further already weakening 4Q08 admission numbers and increasing bad debt levels. We note that hospitals by law must treat all patients in need of emergency care, regardless of whether they have insurance.
</p><p>
We currently rate both <b>Community Health Systems (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CYH">CYH</a>)</b> and <b>Universal Health Services, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/UHS">UHS</a>)</b> with Hold recommendations.<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-industry-industry-outlook-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is 60K a Year Too ‘Wealthy’ For Entitlement Benefits?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/is-60k-a-year-too-%e2%80%98wealthy%e2%80%99-for-entitlement-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/is-60k-a-year-too-%e2%80%98wealthy%e2%80%99-for-entitlement-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Office;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pOne of the effects of the current crisis will be severe cuts in entitlement programs for “the wealthy.” MoneyNews.com reports that anyone making more than $60,000 a year will be refused entitlement payments under new proposals from members of Congress.br /
Baby boomers will feel the brunt of the shortfalls in the Social Security and Medicare trust funds. The so-called “means testing” proposal for entitlements is yet another way of screwing savers and earners in America. The message is clear: if you can afford your retirement on private savings, no entitlement payments for you, even if you put into the system for decades./p
pAmericans have just lost over $10 trillion in wealth in the housing crash, stocks are still about 40% off their#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/is-60k-a-year-too-%e2%80%98wealthy%e2%80%99-for-entitlement-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberator Medical Holdings, Inc. (LBMH.OB) Launches New Division to Address Diabetes Educational Needs</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/liberator-medical-holdings-inc-lbmhob-launches-new-division-to-address-diabetes-educational-needs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/liberator-medical-holdings-inc-lbmhob-launches-new-division-to-address-diabetes-educational-needs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Additionally;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Diabetes Association;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aventis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baker;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Educators Chapter Presidents Council;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duval;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Services Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Lilly and Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evelyn P. Schumacher;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacksonville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacksonville Association of Diabetes Educators;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberator Health;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberator Medical Holdings Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Libratore;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nassau;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novartis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[owned subsidiary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=15370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberator Medical Holdings, Inc. announced this morning that it has formed a new division to meet the educational needs of millions in the United States. The new Diabetes Self-Management Program is being led by industry veteran Evelyn P. Schumacher, MS, RD, CDE, who has agreed to serve as Vice-President of the new division, Liberator Health [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/liberator-medical-holdings-inc-lbmhob-launches-new-division-to-address-diabetes-educational-needs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RehabCare Group Inc. &#8211; Value &#8211; Zacks Rank Buy</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/rehabcare-group-inc-value-zacks-rank-buy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/rehabcare-group-inc-value-zacks-rank-buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Ryniec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RehabCare Group Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rehabilitation program management services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rehabilitation services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skilled nursing services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Value - Zacks Rank Buy RehabCare Group Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/10965/RehabCare+Group+Inc.+-+Value+-+Zacks+Rank+Buy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>RehabCare Group Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/RHB">RHB</a>), which provides rehabilitation services, continued its hot streak of earnings surprise as it beat for the 4th consecutive quarter. Revenue grew by 11.6% on strong demand for skilled nursing services. RHB trades at 12.5x forward earnings.<p ALIGN="left">

<b>Company Description</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

RehabCare provides rehabilitation program management services at over 1,200 hospitals and skilled nursing facilities in 42 states. The company also operates freestanding rehabilitation hospitals and long-term acute care hospitals across the country.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Revenue Jumped 11.6% in the First Quarter</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

On May 5, RehabCare reported first quarter results which surprised on analysts' estimates by 54.84%, or 17 cents a share. Earnings per share were 48 cents compared to 25 cents per share in the year ago period. Analysts expected 31 cents.</p><p ALIGN="left">

Revenue grew by 11.6% to $203.4 million compared to a year ago fueled by growth in each segment. The Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation Services segment had a stronger than expected performance, with growth of 9.5%, primarily due to strong same store revenue growth, exceptional average daily census (ADC) and strong productivity.</p><p ALIGN="left">

The Hospital Rehabilitation Services segment saw revenue increase 7.2%. Inpatient operating revenues improved 6.7% and inpatient rehabilitation facility same store discharges climbed 1.1% compared to the year ago period.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Balance Sheet</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

The company continues to whittle at its debt. At the end of March, the company had $38.2 million in cash and cash equivalents and $57 million in outstanding debt. Net debt (outstanding debt less cash and cash equivalents) fell to $18.8 million at the end of March compared to $60.5 million in the year ago period.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>2009 Outlook</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

The company is cautious about the rest of the year despite the outstanding first quarter. RehabCare believes that unit growth may be impacted by the current credit environment going forward. Downward pricing pressure may also occur in the fourth quarter due to the proposed rule for fiscal year 2010 Medicare reimbursement in skilled nursing facilities.</p><p ALIGN="left">

The company has decided not to provide revenue or earnings per share guidance for the year.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Consensus Estimates Rise</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

Despite the lack of guidance and cautious words from the company about the economic conditions for the rest of the year, covering analysts are more bullish. Second quarter estimates are up 4 cents to 37 cents per share in the last month.</p><p ALIGN="left">

Full-year consensus estimates jumped 8.5% to $1.41 from $1.30 in the last 30 days.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Value Fundamentals</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

RehabCare Group is a Zacks #1 Rank (strong buy) stock. The company trades at 12.5x forward earnings and has a price-to-book of 1.32.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/rehabcare-group-inc-value-zacks-rank-buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberator Medical Holdings Inc. (LBMH.OB) Posts Triple-Digit Increases in Revenue and Gross Profit</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/liberator-medical-holdings-inc-lbmhob-posts-triple-digit-increases-in-revenue-and-gross-profit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/liberator-medical-holdings-inc-lbmhob-posts-triple-digit-increases-in-revenue-and-gross-profit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Davis;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance deductibles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberator Medical Holdings Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail advertising campaign targeting new customers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Libratore;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=15361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberator Medical Holdings Inc., a national provider of direct-to-consumer medical supplies to senior citizens eligible for Medicare, today announced its second-quarter financial results for the period ended March 31, 2009. 
The company posted revenues of $5.83 million, up an astounding 309% from the $1.43 million reported for the first quarter of 2008. Liberator Medical attributes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/liberator-medical-holdings-inc-lbmhob-posts-triple-digit-increases-in-revenue-and-gross-profit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Modest Proposal &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/a-modest-proposal-analyst-blog-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/a-modest-proposal-analyst-blog-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog We]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameroon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Disease control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E Trade Financial Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lower government services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oecd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Charles Schwab Corp.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20332/A+Modest+Proposal+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style: italic;">We highlight Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/gs">GS</a>), E-Trade Financial Corp. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/etfc">ETFC</a>) and The Charles Schwab Corp. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/schw">SCHW</a>).</span><br /><br />The Federal Deficit will be almost $2 Trillion this year, or over 12% of GDP. If we exclude the WWII years, the previous peak in the deficit as a percent of GDP was 6.3% under Reagan. Next year, the deficit is projected to decline to about $1.2 Trillion, a projection that strikes me as optimistic, but even if achieved will still be a greater share of GDP than during the worst fiscal excesses of the Reagan years.<br /><br />Much of the deficit this year is unavoidable, as it comes from shrinking revenues as much as from higher spending. With profits down, corporate income taxes are down; with people unemployed, or having their salaries or hours cut, they pay less individual income taxes. And you can just guess what the worst bear market since the Great Depression has done to capital gains taxes.<br /><br />The stimulus spending was needed to get the economy back on track (along with a very aggressive Fed). Without it, there would be little hope of breaking the vicious cycle dragging the economy down, and with it future tax revenues. However, a huge amount of spending has been directed at the financial sector. While there is some hope that these "investments" will not be a total loss, few expect the $700 in TARP money to actually turn a profit. We will be lucky if we end up getting $500 billion of it back. There have also been huge hidden subsidies to the financial sector in the form of loan guarantees, etc.<br /><br />Even under the rosy scenario of Obama's budget, the Federal debt will balloon from 40.8% of GDP in 2008 to 65.8% in 2013. This will put a huge burden on our children and grandchildren as they will have to face either higher taxes or lower government services (or both).<br /><br />Cutting spending or significantly raising taxes at this point would be a huge mistake, and even 2011 may be too soon to do so. After all, when FDR pulled back from the New Deal in 1937, the economy promptly fell back into a nasty recession -- in distinct contrast to his first term, which saw some of the fastest growth in GDP and Industrial Production in U.S. history (obviously coming off a very low base).<br /><br />The debt overhang we are working off now is much larger relative to the economy than what we had in the late 1920's, so the scale of the problem is similar to that of the Depression. The biggest difference is that we acted promptly this time around, rather than dithering for years and years. Still, at some point we are going to have to raise more revenue.<br /><br />The options for cutting spending significantly are limited outside of health care (and then only if an optional public plan is part of the reform, voluntary efforts by the Health Care industry will not do the job and should not really be taken seriously). Cut back military spending? In case you have not noticed, we are still fighting two wars. Cut back spending on things like the national Institutes of Health and the Center for Disease control in the face of a possible pandemic? Cut back on infrastructure spending when our bridges are literally falling down, and we need to put people to work?<br /><br />While I would love to see us cut back on agricultural subsidies, half of the U.S. Senate is elected by 15% of the population, and that 15% includes lots of farmers and those dependent of the farm economy, so this is not going to happen. Cutting Veterans benefits hardly seems to be an honorable thing to do to those who have sacrificed in Iraq and Afghanistan, and should be off the table regardless of how you feel about the wisdom of being involved with those wars.<br /><br />Eliminate earmarks? Perhaps on procedural grounds it would be wise, but from a budgetary standpoint that was complete campaign nonsense last year. The simply do not add up to that much in the context of the overall budget. Cutting revenue sharing with the States when they are generally in worse fiscal shape than the Federal government (with the largest state being the poster boy for state fiscal problems) does not seem to be a very good answer either.<br /><br />Unless you want to not pay the interest on the federal debt, or want to drastically cut Social Security and Medicare benefits, there is not that much available to cut on the spending side. Besides, Social Security has been subsidizing the rest of the government for the last quarter century, and cutting benefits now that those loans to the general fund have to be repayed would be the ultimate bait and switch.<br /><br />One way or another, a big part of the solution is going to have to come on the revenue side. Given the huge inequality of wealth and income in this country (huge relative to our OECD peers, based on the Gini Coefficient, we are closer to Cameroon than Canada in terms of income inequality) we need to avoid putting too much on the backs of the working class. Here is what I would suggest:<br /><br />Today, the NYSE will probably trade about 5 billion shares. The average price of a S&#38;P 500 stock is about $33. Thus, on the NYSE alone, $165 billion is changing hands in a single day. If there were a transaction fee of 0.1% on that, it would raise $165 million a day, or with about 250 trading days a year, about $41.25 billion per year. If similar fees were levied at the Nasdaq and on options, the total could reach the vicinity of $100 billion. That is not enough to close the fiscal gap, but not exactly chopped liver either.<br /><br />Long-term investors would hardly notice the tax, but speculating day traders would quickly start to feel the bite. Encouraging people to take a long-term view and actually invest -- rather than engage in pure speculation in little pieces of paper that just happen to represent real companies -- would be a good thing, in my view.<br /><br />The tax would fall on the Financial sector, and would be a way that that sector ends up repaying the lavish subsidies that it has recently received. Since wealth is even more unequally distributed in this country than is income -- and the wealthy hold much more of their wealth in equities than do the middle class -- the tax would be highly progressive. In effect, the tax would be like a slightly higher commission charge.<br /><br />This, at the margin, might hurt firms that do a lot of trading particularly for their own account, like <span style="font-weight: bold;">Goldman Sachs</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/gs">GS</a>). For firms that trade mostly for their clients like <span style="font-weight: bold;">E-Trade</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/etfc">ETFC</a>) and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Charles Schwab</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/schw">SCHW</a>), I suspect that the fee would be passed along to the customer, especially since it could not be avoided by moving your account to another broker.<br /><br />As long as the rate was kept low, it would be a very painless tax for all involved. The danger would be that it was too effective, and that the rate would rise over time and trading activity would move offshore. However, at the 0.1% level, I do not see that as a significant danger. Somehow we managed to have a working financial system even before May Day (5/1/75, when fixed commissions ended), when it was not uncommon for transaction fees to be over 3% of the transaction value.<br /><br />Current transaction fees are almost zero; somehow I don't see how a minor increase would kill the markets. On the other hand, not bringing the fiscal deficit under control in the medium to long term, could kill not just the markets, but the entire economy.
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=SCHW">Read the full analyst report on "SCHW"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/a-modest-proposal-analyst-blog-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug Cos to Present at ASCO &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drug-cos-to-present-at-asco-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drug-cos-to-present-at-asco-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Clinical Oncology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amgen Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biogen Idec Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog We]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol Myers Squibb Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisplatin;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorectal cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cougar Biotechnology Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Lilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giant cell tumor;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDV3100;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medivation Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melanoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSCLC;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orlando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osteosarcoma;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pancreatic Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfizer Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostate Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small cell lung cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapy for prostate cancer;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vectibix;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20236/Drug+Cos+to+Present+at+ASCO+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style: italic;">We highlight Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/bmy">BMY</a>), Pfizer Inc (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/pfe">PFE</a>), Medivation Inc (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mdvn">MDVN</a>), Cougar Biotechnology Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cgrb">CGRB</a>), Eli Lilly &#38; Co. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/lly">LLY</a>), Amgen Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/amgn">AMGN</a>) and Biogen Idec Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/biib">BIIB</a>).</span><br /><br />The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is set for May 29th - June 2nd in Orlando, Florida. ASCO is an annual forum where pharmaceutical and biotech companies come to present data on their cancer drugs in all stages of development. ASCO is a widely followed event by analysts and investors interested in new information on key pipeline and currently marketed compounds.  We list what to look for from several of the companies that will be attending and presenting at this year's ASCO event.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Bristol-Myers Squibb</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/bmy">BMY</a>) will be presenting updated survival data of its melanoma candidate, ipilimumab, from several phase II and phase III trials, both as a monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy. Bristol will also have several presentations on Erbitux, including phase II data in combination with cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Pfizer Inc</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/pfe">PFE</a>) will be presenting phase II data on Sutent in combination with docetaxel in patients with previously untreated hormone refractory prostate cancer. Other noteworthy prostate cancer presentations will come from <span style="font-weight: bold;">Medivation Inc </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mdvn">MDVN</a>) and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Cougar Biotechnology </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cgrb">CGRB</a>). Medivation will have phase II data on MDV3100 in hormonal therapy and chemotherpay experienced patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Cougar will present data on its CRPC candidate, abirateron acetate, in chemptherapy-experienced patients.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Eli Lilly </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/lly">LLY</a>) will be making more than 50 presentations at ASCO 2009 including several on Alimta in NSCLC and Gemzar in combination with cisplatin in cervical cancer.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Amgen</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/amgn">AMGN</a>) plans a very busy ASCO as well. Most of these are data presentations are results from testing Vectibix (panitumumab) in various stages and combination regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer. The company plans presentations by KRAS tumor status with Vectibix as well, plus several combination studies testing Vectibix and AMG-655 in lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer.<br /><br />We will also see a slew of data on denosumab, including data on fractures in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, bone mineral density in women with breast cancer, giant cell tumor of the bone, and osteosarcoma. Finally, Amgen will offer up important data on its Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) testing the drugs under new national coverage decision and U.S. / EU guidelines for Hb levels, and a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER)-Medicare study quantifying complications associated with taking ESAs in patients with metastatic breast cancer.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Biogen</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/biib">BIIB</a>) will be presenting results from a phase II study comparing volociximab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin vs. doxorubicin alone in recurrent ovarian or peritoneal cancer.
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BMY">Read the full analyst report on "BMY"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=PFE">Read the full analyst report on "PFE"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MDVN">Read the full analyst report on "MDVN"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CGRB">Read the full analyst report on "CGRB"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=LLY">Read the full analyst report on "LLY"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AMGN">Read the full analyst report on "AMGN"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BIIB">Read the full analyst report on "BIIB"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drug-cos-to-present-at-asco-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Laying the Groundwork For a Tax Hike?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/obama-laying-the-groundwork-for-a-tax-hike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/obama-laying-the-groundwork-for-a-tax-hike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael E. Brisky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FULL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael brisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Laying;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Rancho;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung 320PX 32 in. LCD TV;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Office of Management and Budget;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-819581243324579563.post-6098233797094951106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We've been seeing massive amounts of money committed by the federal government since President Obama took office in January.  The budget is exploding, we've got a huge stimulus package to pay for, and Social Security and Medicare are going bankrupt.  I also see a couple more possibilities:br /br /-A major health care plan.  We've already heard that it could be coming this year even.  Where are we going to get the money to pay for it?br /br /-Another stimulus package.  I would not be surprised if this happens as the idea has already been floated.br /br /-Bailouts for state governments.  California is in the worst shape, but many others are not far behind.br /br /-Bailouts for commercial real estate loans and the next round of foreclosures.  There is a massive amount of rate resets coming in 2010 and 2011.  See the chart for more details.br /br /a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_VQGtBvsQTCg/Sg1nyob2Y-I/AAAAAAAAApo/lQs1WEfm2Og/s1600-h/rate+resets.jpg"img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 294px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_VQGtBvsQTCg/Sg1nyob2Y-I/AAAAAAAAApo/lQs1WEfm2Og/s320/rate+resets.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5336035253049254882" border="0" //abr /So, Obama finally spoke a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchiveamp;sid=aJsSb4qtILhg"about the economic realities we have to face yesterday/a.br /br /blockquotePresident a href="http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Barack+Obamaamp;site=wnewsamp;client=wnewsamp;proxystylesheet=wnewsamp;output=xml_no_dtdamp;ie=UTF-8amp;oe=UTF-8amp;filter=pamp;getfields=wnnisamp;sort=date:D:S:d1" onmouseover="return escape( popwSearchNews( this ))"Barack Obama/a, calling current deficit spending “unsustainable,” warned of skyrocketing interest rates for consumers if the U.S. continues to finance government by borrowing from other countries.             p“We can’t keep on just borrowing from China,” Obama said at a town-hall meeting in Rio Rancho, New Mexico, outside Albuquerque. “We have to pay interest on that debt, and that means we are mortgaging our children’s future with more and more debt.”     /p        pHolders of U.S. debt will eventually “get tired” of buying it, causing interest rates on everything from auto loans to home mortgages to increase, Obama said. “It will have a dampening effect on our economy.”     /pEarlier this week, the Obama administration revised its own budget estimates and raised the projected deficit for this year to a record $1.84 trillion, up 5 percent from the February estimate. The revision for the 2010 fiscal year estimated the deficit at $1.26 trillion, up 7.4 percent from the February figure. The White House Office of Management and Budget also projected next year’s budget will end up at $3.59 trillion, compared with the $3.55 trillion it estimated previously./blockquotebr /He said it himself.  We can't keep borrowing.  But, he wants to keep spending, and increasing the rate of that spending.  The money has to come from somewhere.  There is no where else but through increasing taxes.  It is coming.div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/819581243324579563-6098233797094951106?l=briskycapital.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/obama-laying-the-groundwork-for-a-tax-hike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
