<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stock Market News &#38; Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks &#187; Iceland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.straightstocks.com/tag/iceland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.straightstocks.com</link>
	<description>Leading Stock Market News, Opinions and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NeurogesX Wins Big Approval &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/neurogesx-wins-big-approval-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/neurogesx-wins-big-approval-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astellas;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commission of European Communities;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large-cap pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liechtenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postherpetic neuralgia;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/27358/NeurogesX+Wins+Big+Approval+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<em><strong>FDA Approves NeurogesX's Qutenza</strong></em><br />
<br />
After the market closed on November 16, 2009, <strong>NeurogesX </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ngsx">NGSX</a>) announced that the U.S. FDA had approved Qutenza (capsaicin patch) for the management of neuropathic pain due to postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).  We expect management to spend the next several months preparing for the launch by facilitating reimbursement procedure, establishing distribution channels, hiring and training the specialty sales force, and conducting the manufacturing for commercial supply.<br />
<br />
Key to our bullish sales forecast for the drug will be establishing a permanent reimbursement code for both the product and application, as Qutenza requires administration by a physician or healthcare professional. <br />
<br />
Qutenza is a cutaneous (skin) patch designed to treat peripheral neuropathic pain conditions. The Qutenza patch provides a pure high concentration (8%) of a synthetic capsaicin, known as trans­-capsaicin, directly to the site of pain via a rapid-delivery cutaneous delivery system designed to provide three months of relief with minimal potential for side effects, abuse, or drug-drug interactions.<br />
<br />
Qutenza has been studied in roughly 2,500 patients during its clinical program. Clinical studies have shown that PHN pain can be reduced for up to 12 weeks following a single one hour treatment. In the phase III PHN trial, patients administered Qutenza saw an average 30% to 32% reduction in pain vs. 20% to 24% for the control. Additionally, a significant number of patients on Qutenza demonstrated greater than a 30% reduction in pain over the course of treatment.<br />
<br />
We believe management&#8217;s goal in the U.S. is to promote the product through an in-house specialty sales force -- eventually that may grow to the size of 80 to 100 representatives. The company has spent the last few months expanding the senior management team to bring in directors of marketing, commercial operations, sales and business development.<br />
<br />
Management also recently conducted a qualitative and quantitative marketing study in preparation of approval. As of now, our financial model assumes a launch during the first half of 2010 with a small specialized sales force of around 20 to 25 representatives. This group will target the top quartile or so of the 5,000 pain centers and 10,000 neurologists that are high-prescribers for PHN. When progress is made here, management will probably look to expand through expansion of the force or signing a co-promotion agreement.    <br />
<br />
Outside the U.S., NeurogesX has partnered Qutenza with Japanese large-cap pharmaceutical company Astellas. NeurogesX received approval for Qutenza in the European Union in May 2009. The deal with Astellas includes all 27 EU member states, plus Iceland, Norway, Liechtenstein and Switzerland, along with the Middle East and Africa. Astellas plans to be ready to launch the product during the first half of 2010, and will pay NeurogesX a scaling mid-teen to mid-twenty percent royalty on sales. <br />
 <br />
We continue to be positive on NeurogesX. We are maintaining our Outperform rating and expect the share to trade upwards towards are $12 target over the near-term.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=NGSX">Read the full analyst report on "NGSX"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/neurogesx-wins-big-approval-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EcoloCap Solutions, Inc. (ECOS.OB) Gains Worldwide Attention with M-Fuel</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/ecolocap-solutions-inc-ecos-ob-gains-worldwide-attention-with-m-fuel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/ecolocap-solutions-inc-ecos-ob-gains-worldwide-attention-with-m-fuel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EcoloCap Solutions Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economical product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M-Fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Siegel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micro Bubble Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morocco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President and CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=18733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EcoloCap Solutions Inc. will be hosting representatives from four continents in Korea this November in the first ever public unveiling of the company’s M-Fuel product, an innovative suspension fuel for use in diesel engines. M-Fuel, developed and manufactured by MBT (Micro Bubble Technologies), a subsidiary of EcoloCap Solutions Inc., is an innovative suspension fuel that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/ecolocap-solutions-inc-ecos-ob-gains-worldwide-attention-with-m-fuel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prieur’s readings (October 20, 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/prieur%e2%80%99s-readings-october-20-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/prieur%e2%80%99s-readings-october-20-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prieur du Plessis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedge Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Posten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Blinder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allan Dodds Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltic states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank reserves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catastrophic economic and banking collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Einhorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[founder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galleon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerard Lyons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gideon Rachman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment postcards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Pisani-Ferry;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martin weiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Skapinker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger  Lowenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second anniversary of Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/?p=12462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post provides links to a number of interesting articles I have read over the past few days that you may also enjoy. Please also add the links to any other worthwhile articles you would like to share to the comments section. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/prieur%e2%80%99s-readings-october-20-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snapshot Observations on the Global Economic Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/snapshot-observations-on-the-global-economic-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/snapshot-observations-on-the-global-economic-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Amsterdam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel's government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chancellor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Goldman;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas and oil prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geir Haarde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guarantee bank assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil-driven economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premier Wen Jiabao's government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime Minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silva's administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taro Aso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bank of Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typical old-media fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U .S. Federal Reserve;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wen Jiabao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wide scale insurance program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.robertamsterdam.com,2009://1.21494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN Money is running an interesting feature by David Goldman entitled "10 countries, 10 solutions" which details the particularities of the global economic crisis facing 10 key countries. In typical old-media fashion, the layout makes no sense from a user-friendliness...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/snapshot-observations-on-the-global-economic-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alcoa Hopeful about Aluminum &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/alcoa-hopeful-about-aluminum-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/alcoa-hopeful-about-aluminum-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoa Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Century Aluminum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Operating Officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPP Worldwide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean-Pierre Gilardeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Thuestad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24552/Alcoa+Hopeful+about+Aluminum+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>Alcoa Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AA">AA</a>) recently realigned its Global Primary Products (GPP) business organization in order to poise the company to seize growth opportunities on economic recovery. <br />
<br />
Alcoa has named John Thuestad as the Chief Operating Officer for GPP Worldwide and Jean-Pierre Gilardeau as the President for GPP for North America and Iceland. Thuestad was previously the President of GPP&#8217;s U.S. branch, while Gilardeau had been President, GPP-Canada and Iceland. <br />
<br />
Alcoa also raised its annual forecast for global aluminum consumption. The company now predicts that global consumption will decline by 5.5%, while the previous forecast was a decline of 7%. <br />
<br />
The company attributed the improved outlook to a stronger demand for the metal in China. Alcoa believes the economic stimulus spending in China will drive up the country&#8217;s aluminum consumption by 8% in the second half. The full year consumption is expected to be up by 4%. <br />
<br />
Aluminum producers have been facing weak demand since mid-2008. Companies such as Alcoa and <strong>Century Aluminum</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CENX">CENX</a>) have reported losses for three consecutive quarters. <br />
<br />
Demand for aluminum has declined sharply in both developed and developing nations primarily due to weakness in the two major end markets &#8211; Automobile and Construction. Significant decline in demand along with high inventory levels has led to lower aluminum prices. In response to falling demand and lower prices, the primary aluminum industry has announced significant production cuts. <br />
<br />
Despite production cuts and higher expected consumption in China, we believe the aluminum market will remain oversupplied for the rest of 2009. Demand for the metal is expected to remain low for the next couple of quarters.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AA">Read the full analyst report on "AA"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CENX">Read the full analyst report on "CENX"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/alcoa-hopeful-about-aluminum-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today in Russian Business &#8211; August 14, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-russia-stocks/today-in-russian-business-august-14-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-russia-stocks/today-in-russian-business-august-14-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Amsterdam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrei Kostin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank head]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IzhAvto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molot factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sberbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vladimir putin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VTB chief]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.robertamsterdam.com,2009://1.19805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following stalls in negotiations, Magna and Sberbank have modified the terms of their agreement to buy Opel, and are now apparently confident that GM Motors will be able to accept their offer.&#160; To see a timeline of events in the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-russia-stocks/today-in-russian-business-august-14-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Advances in Development Reverse Fertility Declines&#8221; &#8211; Science or Hocus Pocus?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/advances-in-development-reverse-fertility-declines-science-or-hocus-pocus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/advances-in-development-reverse-fertility-declines-science-or-hocus-pocus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 08:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Below I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon PowerShot S400 / IXUS 400 Digital Camera;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claus Vistesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commission of European Communities;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Completed Cohort Fertility Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[correspondent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francesco Billari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global economy matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hans Peter Kohler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media circus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myrskyla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[observer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population Association of America Annual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung 400PX 40 in. HDTV-Ready LCD TV;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the University of Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vienna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vienna Institute of Demography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-4815330640925891745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: : L'Escala de Empordàbr /br /According to a once-upon-a-time post on the Economist's a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/certainideasofeurope/2007/07/a_fistful_of_reply.cfm#list-comments"Certain Ideas of Europe Blog/a Edward Hugh “was very cross” about some of the journalism they were serving up over at that prestigious journal. Well, not to worry, since this time he is hopping mad. And the issue which lies behind his wrath is essentially the same one, how to interpret and understand the demographic processes which are currently so evidently affecting our societies. In what is simply the latest episode in a long and sorry saga (if you want documentation, please see the comments Claus Vistesen and I nailed to their "Wall" in the above linked post) this week's print issue contains a href="http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnology/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14164483"a research review from their science and technology correspondent/a who is evidently not backward in coming forward with headline grabbing claims. According to the said corresponedent the demographic transition (a process which has been ongoing for over two hundred years now) has finally and definitively gone into reverse gear:br /blockquote"One of the paradoxes of human biology is that the rich world has fewer children than the poor world. In most species, improved circumstances are expected to increase reproductive effort, not reduce it, yet as economic development gets going, country after country has experienced what is known as the demographic transition: fertility (defined as the number of children borne by a woman over her lifetime) drops from around eight to near one and a half. That number is so small that even with the reduced child mortality which usually accompanies development it cannot possibly sustain the population.br /br /If Mikko Myrskyla of the University of Pennsylvania and his colleagues are correct, though, things might not be quite as bad as that. A study they have just published in Nature suggests that as development continues, the demographic transition goes into reverse."/blockquotebr /br /Well quite a strong claim is being made here. The idea that a group of researchers have come up with a finding that shows the "rule....that people have fewer children as their countries get richer...no longer holds true" is certainly not one to be sniffed at. Such a strong claim needs some very heavy backing you would think, given all the research that has gone into the topic in recent years.br /br /In fact, the research makes no such direct claim, since Myrskylä et al simply find statistically significant evidence for a reversal in the relationship between the human development index (HDI)br /and the total fertility rate (Tfr) at HDI levels around 0.85–0.9. The rest is only interpretation. As we will see, to move from a simple statististical correlation to formulating a hypothesis you need an explanatory framework, and you need to be able to make falsifiable predictions. The Nature letter from Myrskylä et al is far from being at this stage of development. They have simply found an interesting correlation, and the rest is in the eye of the observer.br /br /blockquote"Back in 1975, a graph plotting fertility rate against the Human Development Index fell as the Human Development Index rose. By 2005, though, the line had a kink in it. Above an HDI of 0.9 or so, it turned up, producing what is known in the jargon as a “J-shaped” curve (even though it is the mirror image of a letter J). As the chart shows, in many countries with really high levels of development (around 0.95) fertility rates are now approaching two children per woman. There are exceptions, notably Canada and Japan, but the trend is clear."/blockquotebr /br /However, according to the Economist the trend is clear. But is it? Edward has been doing some digging.br /br /In fact the problem goes beyond the Economist, since the source behind the article is a letter published in Nature. Below a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v460/n7256/full/nature08230.html"you can read that letter/a.br /br /blockquote"During the twentieth century, the global population has gone through unprecedented increases in economic and social development that coincided with substantial declines in human fertility and population growth rates. The negative association of fertility with economic and social development has therefore become one of the most solidly established and generally accepted empirical regularities in the social sciences. As a result of this close connection between development and fertility decline, more than half of the global population now lives in regions with below-replacement fertility (less than 2.1 children per woman. In many highly developed countries, the trend towards low fertility has also been deemed irreversible. Rapid population ageing, and in some cases the prospect of significant population decline, have therefore become a central socioeconomic concern and policy challenge10. Here we show, using new cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of the total fertility rate and the human development index (HDI), a fundamental change in the well-established negative relationship between fertility and development as the global population entered the twenty-first century. Although development continues to promote fertility decline at low and medium HDI levels, our analyses show that at advanced HDI levels, further development can reverse the declining trend in fertility. The previously negative development–fertility relationship has become J-shaped, with the HDI being positively associated with fertility among highly developed countries. This reversal of fertility decline as a result of continued economic and social development has the potential to slow the rates of population ageing, thereby ameliorating the social and economic problems that have been associated with the emergence and persistence of very low fertility."/blockquotebr /br /br /Here is the chart (reproduce from Nature data) which the Economist presents to illustrate the 'J curve' relationship.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn1c5QH2KJI/AAAAAAAAOw8/9EElMH7Rg3w/s1600-h/Nature+Chart.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 252px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 277px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5367548469545674898" border="0" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn1c5QH2KJI/AAAAAAAAOw8/9EElMH7Rg3w/s400/Nature+Chart.png" //abr /br /Nice, isn't it? Nature even go to the lengths of a putting up a special "event" podcast featuring an interview with Hans Peter Kohler (a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/podcast/"click here for link/a) as if to underline the importance of the "finding") But does any of this have any compelling validity?br /br /Methinks not as much as the authors of the letter, or those who are covering it in the media, are trying to make out. There are many issues which are raised here, but I would just like to mention three.br /br /The first is the decision of the research team to work with a period based fertility measure which is known to be very unreliable for "tempo" reasons (the Total Fertility Rate- Tfr) as the basis for a longitudinal study. And let us remember, the authors only really claim to have found a correlation between HDI levels in the 0.85–0.9 range and movements in the Tfr, and there could be many explanations for this. Indeed the authors themselves even offer one of them in their supplementary information - "countries at development levels near the critical level HDI = 0.86 might have a more rapid postponement of childbearing than more advanced countries.. " - a possibility which, in fairness to the authors, they try to test for.br /br /And you don't have to rely on me for the suggestion that the Tfr is hardly the most desireable measure for what they want to do, since the authors themselves point this very fact out in the supplementary information (and the only thing which surprises me is that nobody else who has reviewed the research seems to have twigged the implications of this). So the very title of the Letter is totally misleading, they have not found that "Advances in Development Reverse Fertility Declines" -since in the first place the direction of causality is not adequately determined (it might be that reverses in fertility decline advance development, as I try to show in a piece referenced below) and in any event the research only shows movements in the HDI correlate with movements in the Tfr (and not with "fertility").br /br /blockquoteThe recent literature on low fertility in developed countries has pointed to the important role of delayed childbearing, that is, the ongoing postponement of childbearing to increasingly later ages. In the context of this paper, delayed childbearing is potentially important because the postponement of childbearing can distort the total fertility rate as a measure of the quantum (or long-term level) of fertility. “Tempo effects”, or the reductions in the total fertility rate resulting from a postponement of childbearing, have been shown to partially explain the very low fertility rates observed in some European countries./blockquotebr /br /So this is the first issue. Due to the phenomenon of birth postponement, the Tfr is a hopelessly unreliable indicator, and what is often called "the birth recovery" is in fact a statistical issue produced by the fact that the Tfr first sinks to very low levels (the birth dearth) and then recovers as women reach the new (higher) childbearing age. Since all of this is simply so obvious, I am absolutely astounded that two such well known and highly respected demographers - Hans-Peter Kohler and Francesco Billari - have placed their name on a piece of research that could almost be described as a publicity stunt. I am even more astounded by the way Nature appear to have been hoodwinked.br /br /Basically, I don't think that there can be any doubt that if they used a more comprehensive measure of fertility - say completed cohort fertility - they wouldn't get the correlation they claim to have found, since CFRs never fell so low, and have not bounced back in the same way. This is essentially because this indicator removes the temporal component found in the TFR (older first birth ages among women in developed societies) and only focuses on quantity. True, they did carry out a robustness test using an adjusted Tfr, but the results are much weaker, and the sample far from satisfactory (at least for the claims being made), and the authors well know this (see below).br /br /In their longitudinal study the authors look at Tfrs for a number of countries over the period 1975 to 2005 and compare these to the lowest Tfr reading observed while a country's HDI was within the 0.85–0.9 window. For all countries considered, the HDI in 2005 was found to be higher than the HDI in the reference year. For 18 of the 26 countries that attained a HDI 0.9 by 2005, the Tfr in 2005 was found to be higher than the TFR in the reference year. As I say, this is hardly surprising, given the tempo impact on Tfrs. The "2005 18" are Norway, the Netherlands, the United States, Denmark, Germany, Spain, Belgium, Luxembourg, Finland, Israel, Italy, Sweden, France, Iceland, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Greece and Ireland.br /br /Perhaps it is more surprising (and interesting) to learn that they found six countries where the HDI was over 0.9 but where the Tfrs didn't pick up: Japan, Austria, Australia, Switzerland, Canada and South Korea. Clearly the absence of "rebound" in even the Tfrs is something of a cause for preoccupation in these countries, and examining the background to what is happening in these countries could at the end of the day turn this research into something quite interesting. That is to say, if for their level of development we might have expected the tempo effect to be more or less over, why do some countries continue to have very low fertility levels?br /br /Basically, to shoot a hole straight through their hypothesis (falsify it that is, surely in science things should be falsifiable), I would say it is only necessary to find a significant number of countries in the first group where fertility as measured by a better indicator didn't rise. Unfortunately we don't have a really good time series for such an indicator, but Eurostat have published statistical estimates for Completed Cohort Fertility Rates (Cfrs) for EU countries up to the 1989 cohort. That is, estimates of what fertility is likely to be for women who were 30 in 2009. Looking at this data, the following countries would appear to offer no evidence whatever for a rebound in cohort fertility in what we know to dat: Norway, Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Finland, Sweden, France, Iceland, the UK, Greece and Ireland. That is to say, as far as I am concerned, the whole hypothesis falls till at least subsequent data confirm it.br /br /I haven't been able to check foir the US (but the Cfr is probably up) Israel (also) or New Zealand. Belgium has little available data. So the only two European countries which you could say with some degree of security actually could confirm the hypothesis would be Luxembourg and Spain - but if you just look at the increases in Spain - from 1.34 to 1.35 - and think about the fact that 5 million new migrants arrived (mainly in childbearing ages) between 2000 and 2009, then the result is hardly dramatic, and if you look what just happened to the economy, it is more than likely that GDP per capita is plummeting, and and household income (which has a weighting of more than one third in the HDI) with it. Which brings me to the second question, the reference year. But before I move on to that, as I say above, the authors are perfectly well aware of the issue with using Tfrs.br /blockquoteIn particular, one could speculate that tempo effects might be—at least partially—responsible for the observed change in the development–fertility association. For example, countries at development levels near the critical level HDIcrit = 0.86 might have a more rapid postponement of childbearing than more advanced countries. If this were the case, tempo effects would reduce the TFR more strongly at intermediate than at advanced HDI levels, and the positive association between HDI and TFR in Figures 1–2 could be partially explained by differences in the pace of fertility postponement, rather than by variation in levels among advanced countries./blockquotebr /br /The authors therefore carry out a robustness test which effectively amounts to a cross-sectional study (cross-sectional note, not longitudinal) of the relationship between the total fertility rate with and without adjustment for tempo effects, and the human development index in 1975 and 2005. Tempo adjusted TFRs are not available over the period in question so they simply took data for 2005 (for those countries for which it is available from the ’European Demographic Data Sheet 2008’ (published by the Vienna Institute of Demography, Vienna, Austria) and from McDonald P, Kippen R. The Intrinsic Total Fertility Rate: A New Approach to the Measurement of Fertility (Population Association of America Annual Meeting 2007, New York, 2007). What they can then show is that the HDI–TFR relationship at persists at advanced development stages persists even after adjusting the total fertility rate for tempo effects. But, as I say, this is cross sectional, not longitudional. What does this jargon mean? It means there is no clear causal relationship, since equally it could be better HDIs which is driving better fertility, and hence you can use the HDI to explain differences between countries if you wish, but not the evolution of fertility in individual countries. The 2005 result is show as a black line in the chart below, where you can see that as HDI goes up, Tfr also seems to be higher.br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn1xBKpJlQI/AAAAAAAAOxE/GnOAvjVfEW4/s1600-h/cross+section.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 371px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5367570595746256130" border="0" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn1xBKpJlQI/AAAAAAAAOxE/GnOAvjVfEW4/s400/cross+section.png" //abr /br /Which is very much to the point, and brings me to my second issue, since in my blog post "Taking Solow Seriously - Does Neoclassical Steady State Growth Really Exist?" (a href="http://edwardhughtoo.blogspot.com/2009/06/taking-solow-seriously-does.html"which you can find here/a) - I demonstrate using a few simple charts that the evolution in GDP per capita (which accounts remember for one third of the HDI) may well be a function of underlying population dynamics, since three countries with stronger population growth and higher fertility (the US, the UK and France) evidently perform much better than three will low-to-negative population growth and very low fertility (Italy, Japan and Germany).br /br /Also, it should be remembered, as I mention, we need to think about base years. 2005 was the mid point of a massive and unsustainable asset and construction boom. I think there is little doubt that if we took 2010 or 2011, the results would be rather different.br /br /Finally, the piece in the Economist article that I personallyfind most interesting is the following:br /br /"Dr Myrskyla’s data, however, suggest the ultimate outcome of development may not be a collapsing population at all but, rather, the environmentalist’s nirvana of uncoerced zero population growth."br /br /I want to stress, I certainly think this stationary population idea is certainly one possibility in the more highly developed nations - but if we move to stationary populations, with higher and higher proportions of the population in the older age groups the result is - as we know - a rising median population age. It is the economic impact of the abrupt rise in median age that I personally am focused on, and how just this rise, and the resulting fall in living standards for many young people, might feedback in a negative way on fertility and thus produce ever more rising median ages. In recent days, some have been asking why people like myself are so focused on what is going on in Latvia, which is after all, a pretty small country. Well, I think here in the issues raised by the Nature letter we have just one more reason why that country is important, since in a sense it is conducting a "live" experiment.br /br /Finally, I want to say, none of the above should be read as suggesting that there isn't a great deal of interest and material to talk about in the study the authors have carried out. Nor would I hold them entirely responsible for the way in which others have used and abused their work. I just the reserach doesn't demonstrate what they want it to demonstrate, and that the study doesn't deserve the kind of high media profile it has been receiving, since it is going to mislead the general public more than it will enlighten them, given the important methodological issue which are still to be clarified.br /br /The heart of the problem is twofold. The excessive reliance on a rather problematic indicator (the Tfr) and the causality issue when it comes to GDP per capita and higher fertility (which way does the arrow point?). In fairness the authors do attempt to construct their own combined time series based on a mixture of tempo-adjusted Tfrs and Tfrs, a procedure which seems at the very least to be somewhat problematic if you want to reverse fifty years of academic consensus. And they do get the same sort of result, but the outcome is much weaker and is based on a much smaller sample of only 25 countries. But even this result is at the very least odd, since, as I argue above, cohort fertility hasn't really increased in most of thecountries concerned. So I think we really all need to see more details of how the authors actually constructed the time series to be able to form a better judgement.br /br /But all this being said, and whatever the original intentions of the authors, serious scientific debate does seem to have been turned here into something of a media circus. Wasn't it blogs that were supposed to do that?br /br /strongAppendix/strongbr /br /Below I offer a series of charts showing estimated completed cohort fertility rates based on data compiled by Eurostat using the distribution of births by parity (first and second or higher order births) and mean age of mothers at respective parities to carry out the calculations. Evidently, the most recent data for hard data on completed cohort fertility comes for the 1960 - 1965 cohort. These charts should not be treated as hard data, but a rule-of-thumb type quick visual inspection suggests that it is hard to accept the case for a substantial fertility rebound in many European countries.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3PO8BEe7I/AAAAAAAAOx8/9eOvojQ9XYQ/s1600-h/Switzerland+and+Slovenia.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 203px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5367674186431232946" border="0" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3PO8BEe7I/AAAAAAAAOx8/9eOvojQ9XYQ/s400/Switzerland+and+Slovenia.png" //abr /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3PJ0CFCQI/AAAAAAAAOx0/yu_FnUR5KkM/s1600-h/norway+and+denmark.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 203px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5367674098388633858" border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3PJ0CFCQI/AAAAAAAAOx0/yu_FnUR5KkM/s400/norway+and+denmark.png" //abr /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3PGVm-g8I/AAAAAAAAOxs/1jEqYkUYjqE/s1600-h/netherlands+and+Italy.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 201px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5367674038682289090" border="0" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3PGVm-g8I/AAAAAAAAOxs/1jEqYkUYjqE/s400/netherlands+and+Italy.png" //abr /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3PCbmMTYI/AAAAAAAAOxk/6BPfKQPDsIc/s1600-h/luxembourg+and+spain.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 203px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5367673971570134402" border="0" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3PCbmMTYI/AAAAAAAAOxk/6BPfKQPDsIc/s400/luxembourg+and+spain.png" //abr /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3O-cYGe_I/AAAAAAAAOxc/ktZadAXfAaU/s1600-h/ireland+and+Greece.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 204px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5367673903059991538" border="0" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3O-cYGe_I/AAAAAAAAOxc/ktZadAXfAaU/s400/ireland+and+Greece.png" //abr /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3O6b_brlI/AAAAAAAAOxU/eGWratutFCw/s1600-h/Iceland+and+Sweden.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 201px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5367673834237046354" border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3O6b_brlI/AAAAAAAAOxU/eGWratutFCw/s400/Iceland+and+Sweden.png" //abr /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3O2NEgbvI/AAAAAAAAOxM/sfcSNnQpjQc/s1600-h/finland+and+germany.png"img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; DISPLAY: block; HEIGHT: 202px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5367673761512320754" border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/Sn3O2NEgbvI/AAAAAAAAOxM/sfcSNnQpjQc/s400/finland+and+germany.png" //adiv class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8991369883287712098-4815330640925891745?l=globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/advances-in-development-reverse-fertility-declines-science-or-hocus-pocus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NeurogesX Partners Qutenza &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/neurogesx-partners-qutenza-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/neurogesx-partners-qutenza-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astellas Pharmaceuticals;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commission of European Communities;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e70]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liechtenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/21322/NeurogesX+Partners+Qutenza+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />On June 22, 2009, <span style="font-weight: bold;">NeurogesX</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ngsx">NGSX</a>) announced that it has entered into a development and commercialization partnership for Qutenza, the company's cutaneous patch for neuropathic pain, with Astellas Pharmaceuticals. NeurogesX has licensed for commercialization Qutenza in all 27 EU member states, plus Iceland, Norway, Liechtenstein and Switzerland, along with the Middle East and Africa.<br /><br />Astellas has also agreed to fund the required additional studies as requested by the European Commission, which include a long-term safety program in on-label indications. In return, Astellas has agreed to pay NeurogesX an upfront payment for Qutenza of e30 million ($42 million).<br /><br />We expect that NeurogesX will recognize this payment over the life of the agreement. Astellas has also purchased an option to co-develop NGX-1998, the company's liquid formulation, for e5 million ($7 million). In addition to these upfront payments, Astellas has also committed e70 million ($97 million) in development and sales related milestones for Qutenza and NGX-1998.<br /><br />NeurogesX will be entitled to a mid-teen to mid-20s percent scaling royalty on sales of the product. NeurogesX will continue to supply Qutenza to Astellas at a fixed transfer price. Astellas plan to be ready to launch the product during the first half of 2010.<br /><br />We view the deal as a major positive for NeurogesX. The $49 million in cash provides a significant runway for management to push forward with commercialization plans in the U.S.<br /><br />On the recent conference call, management noted that the 20-person bridging study requested by the U.S. FDA testing a 2.5% lidocaine + 2.5% prilocaine pre-application cream has completed and the company plans to being analyzing the data shortly. This data will be submitted to the FDA in July or August 2009. We expect that the FDA will push back the U.S. PDUFA action date from August 16, 2009 to October / November 2009. If approved, NeurogesX should be in position to launch the product during the first half of 2010.<br /><br />The $49 million upfront payment from Astellas will help management fund the creation of a specialty sales force to promote the product. We view the current cash balance, which should stand between approximately $60 and $65 million at the end of the second quarter 2009, is sufficient to fund operations to cash flow positive by 2011.
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=NGSX">Read the full analyst report on "NGSX"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/neurogesx-partners-qutenza-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Century Aluminum Co. (CENX) Trims Costs; Prepared for Economic Turn</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/century-aluminum-co-cenx-trims-costs-prepared-for-economic-turn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/century-aluminum-co-cenx-trims-costs-prepared-for-economic-turn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum products;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[base metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Century Aluminum Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gramercy alumina refinery of Gramercy Louisiana;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawesville smelter;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland smelter;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamaica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=15553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Past posts have preached a look at the long-term and investing; not where the market is, but where one thinks it will be down the road. Some industries and markets are better suited in this regard than others. An investor that can find companies to fit this long-term strategy is one that will profit at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/century-aluminum-co-cenx-trims-costs-prepared-for-economic-turn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capitalism at Work</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/capitalism-at-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/capitalism-at-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkshire Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car drive;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Schumpeter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Savage;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pontiac GTO;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Returning;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roosevelt;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.K. government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=16508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pWe made a brief trip back to France for a board meeting. Returning to London, people all seemed to be in mourning. strongBlack is the color in London./strong Everyone wears black. Black pants, black skirts, black coats…/p
p…the cabs are black…and so is the mood./p
pstrongLast week, the Bank of England and European Central Bank announced new initiatives aimed at putting some brighter colors in the economy./strong Both banks are going to take up forms of QE – quantitative easing./p
pWhoa…don’t touch that dial! (A reminder for younger readers: TVs and radios used to have dials, which you turned to change the channel. Announcers would begin with ‘Don’t touch that dial’ when they had something important to say.)/p
pWe’re not going to discuss QE – promise!/p
pOn#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/capitalism-at-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Economics On Tilt &#8211; How To Protect Your Assets</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/global-economics-on-tilt-how-to-protect-your-assets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/global-economics-on-tilt-how-to-protect-your-assets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dublin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fdic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Gold Holdings;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=16398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pstrongGold isn’t going to $2,000 an ounce. /strongBefore you gag on your coffee or suffer chest pains, allow me to explain./p
pWe’re about eight years into the bull market, and gold has breached the $1,000 level twice and has spent weeks trading above the old high of $850. Some observers are now saying that gold’s pretty much had its day and that once the recession is over, it will retreat for good./p
pHowever, the four-digit gold price we’ve seen so far is with no price inflation to speak of, no effects of the atrocious increase in the money supply, and despite a rising dollar. strongWhat happens to gold when each of those pictures gets turned upside down – high inflation, excess cash#8230;/strong/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/global-economics-on-tilt-how-to-protect-your-assets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened to the Luck of the Irish?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/what-happened-to-the-luck-of-the-irish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/what-happened-to-the-luck-of-the-irish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 11:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bullish Bankers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernie Madoff;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Lenihan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullish bankers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Kinsella;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullishbankers.com/?p=8322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure you are no stranger to the crisis that has swept our country&#8217;s financial markets for the past year. From Lehman to AIG to Bernie Madoff, the destruction has been basically unmatched in the history of the United States. However, these harsh times in the financial world have not been limited to the United [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/what-happened-to-the-luck-of-the-irish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Bounce Still Bouncing?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/is-the-bounce-still-bouncing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/is-the-bounce-still-bouncing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belarus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buenos Aires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Valley;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jorge;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[less retail space;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nixon  administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pBuenos Aires, Argentina “What’s that smell?”  We were on an airplane when Edward, 15, noticed an odor that seemed out of place. “Dad…you should have at least cleaned your boots!”/p
pThe manure began accumulating when we rode up to the high pasture on Tuesday. More about that below…/p
pIn the meantime, the Dow rallied a bit yesterday – up 127 points…barely half of what it lost on Monday.br /
Is the bounce still bouncing? We don’t know. But we don’t trust it. They say the stock market ‘looks ahead.’ So, it is possible for it to see things we can’t see. On the other hand, what was it looking at two years ago? Didn’t it see the economy going over a cliff? Apparently not./p
pBut#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/is-the-bounce-still-bouncing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revealed: Timing Details on the Second Wave of Toxic Mortgages</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/revealed-timing-details-on-the-second-wave-of-toxic-mortgages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/revealed-timing-details-on-the-second-wave-of-toxic-mortgages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Addison Wiggin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank restructuring;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernie Madoff;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bespoke Investment Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Eisenbeis;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buenos Aires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Delvalle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrupt bank bailout program;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Council Of Economic Advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative accounting;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frederick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Dale Davidson;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John O'Neill;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Weil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Stiglitz;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurt Richebacher;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Interbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark-to-market accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Hutchinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Mayo;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offer Rate (Libor);]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offer Rate;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on-line publication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul O'Neil;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Volcker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rate (Libor);]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richebächer Society;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Parenteau;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities And Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wachovia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells fargo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tr
strongNotes from thebr /
Investment Undergroundbr /
/strong
/tr
tr
 Friday, April 17, 2009br /
Palermo Viejo, Buenos Aires, Argentina
pstrongHere comes subprime II#8230; 3 toxic time bombs to come#8230; The Richebächer legacy lives on#8230; “Scamonomics” explored#8230; Goldman bites the hand that feeds it#8230; TARP loses 75% of taxpayers’ money#8230; How to get $4,201 in your pocket by June 4#8230; Banks’ top 4 accounting gimmicks#8230; Short squeeze pushes market higher#8230; John O’Neill on government’s deceit#8230; James Dale Davidson: How to grab 19% yields on Treasurys (if you’ve got government connections)#8230;  And more!/strong /p
pstrong*** Rob Parenteau, the editor of the reincarnated emRichebächer Letter, /emwarns that we are in for the second wave of these toxic mortgages ahead. /strongThe first time subprime mortgages reset at a higher rate was in 2008 and the subsequent flurry#8230;/p/tr]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/revealed-timing-details-on-the-second-wave-of-toxic-mortgages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can deCODE Genetics Survive? &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/can-decode-genetics-survive-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/can-decode-genetics-survive-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Remittance Systems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/18724/Can+deCODE+Genetics+Survive%3F+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br /><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Financial Position Deteriorating, Ability to Continue Doubted</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">deCODE Genetics</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/dcgn">DCGN</a>) believes it has sufficient resources to sustain operations only into the second quarter of this year. Due to the shortage of cash, the company unfortunately has entered into survival mode. The company's ability to continue as a going concern is doubted if it cannot obtain immediate liquidity resources. <br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Future Uncertain, Under Strategic Review</span><br /><br />Due to the deteriorating financial position, in October, 2008, deCODE genetics announced that the company is carrying out a review of its long-term business strategy. The goal of this strategic review is to optimize the value of these assets for its shareholders by sharpening the focus of its business, selling non-core assets, securing strategic partnerships, and utilizing the resources generated to underpin product development and marketing efforts in its core business.<br /><br />We think the decision has been made because deCODE is under great pressure to raise additional cash. We are very concerned about the company's cash position. <br /><br />The current financial crisis has limited its ability to raise additional capital, especially in Iceland. Whether or not the company can survive may depend on how it can leverage its diagnostics business in the coming quarters. But it may take a relatively long time for the company's diagnositics business to generate enough cash flow. Therefore, forced asset/busines sale or partnership may be the only option to raise additional cash.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">Fourth Quarter Results Beat Estimates</span><br /><br />On March 31, 2009, deCODE Genetics reported fourth quarter 2008 financial results.<br /><br />Revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was $16.1 million, up 21% compared to $13.3 million for the fourth quarter 2007. Fourth quarter revenue was better than our estimate of $14.5 million. The company had $12.0 million in deferred revenue, which will be recognized over future reporting periods.<br /><br />Net loss for the fourth quarter 2008 was $18.0 million ($0.29 per share), compared to $32.4 million ($0.53 per share) for the same period a year ago. In the 4Q08 and 4Q07 periods, $ 5.5 and $7.8 million of the respective net loss figures were due to ARS [Alternative Remittance Systems]-related impairment charges. Excluding the ARS-related charges, net loss for 4Q08 was $12.7 million ($0.21 per share) compared to net loss of $24.7 ($0.40 per share) for 4Q07. 
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=DCGN">Read the full analyst report on "DCGN"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/can-decode-genetics-survive-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hungarian Prime Minister Gyurcsány steps down &#8211; now what?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/hungarian-prime-minister-gyurcsany-steps-down-now-what/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/hungarian-prime-minister-gyurcsany-steps-down-now-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Alvarez-Rivera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance of Free Democrats;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and András Vértes;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Democratic Union;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Union/Christian Social Union;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferenc Gyurcsány]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidesz-Hungarian Civic Union;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Democratic Party;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GKI;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[György Surányi;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helmut Kohl;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helmut Schmidt;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungarian Academy of Sciences Ferenc Glatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungarian Democratic Forum;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungarian National Assembly;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungarian Socialist Party;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bank for Reconstruction and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[László Sólyom;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manuel Alvarez-Rivera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Germany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-5896647894628243858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Manuel Alvarez-Rivera, Puerto Ricobr /br /Last Saturday's announcement by Hungarian Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány that he was stepping down after almost five years as head of government may have come as a surprising turn of events, given that he had stubbornly clung to office despite his growing unpopularity over the course of the last three years. However, what turned out to be completely unexpected was the method he chose to end his mandate: a constructive vote of no-confidence in the National Assembly (Parliament) against his own government.br /br /Under a constructive no-confidence motion, Parliament votes to replace a sitting prime minister with another person, rather than simply bring down the government. This mechanism was introduced in the former West Germany after World War II, in order to prevent a recurrence of the parliamentary deadlock that contributed to the demise of the 1919-33 Weimar Republic.br /br /Constructive votes of no-confidence have been adopted by other European countries - Hungary being one of them - since they ensure cabinet stability by preventing Parliament from removing a government from office without having agreed upon a replacement; in Germany there has only been one successful constructive no-confidence motion, which took place in 1982 when the Bundestag voted to replace Chancellor Helmut Schmidt with Helmut Kohl, after the liberal Free Democratic Party - at the time the Social Democratic Party's junior coalition partner - switched sides and formed an alliance with the Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union.br /br /However, Gyurcsány plans to use the constructive vote of no-confidence to install another Socialist-led cabinet, and his government - which has become the third casualty of the global financial crisis, joining the ranks of A HREF="http://globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com/2009/01/iceland-2009-que-se-vayan-todos.html"Iceland/A and A HREF="http://globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com/2009/02/is-latvia-still-headed-for-early.html"Latvia/A - appears to have resorted to this unusual maneuver for one simple reason: to avoid an early election.br /br /Gyurcsány's post-communist Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP) won Hungary's 2006 general election in coalition with the liberal Alliance of Free Democrats (SZDSZ), but in September of that year a leaked tape revealed that the prime minister had lied about the state of the Hungarian economy to secure re-election. Gyurcsány never recovered from this revelation, which triggered widespread protests that degenerated into rioting. Despite mounting calls for his resignation after the ruling parties suffered a heavy defeat in municipal elections held the following October, Gyurcsány refused to step down and subsequently won a vote of confidence in the National Assembly.br /br /The Socialist-Liberal coalition government then went on to impose fees for visits to the doctor, hospital stays and university tuition, as part of an austerity package intended to reduce the country's large budget deficit (the highest in the European Union as a percentage of GDP) and pave the way for Hungary's adoption of the euro as its currency. However, Gyurcsány suffered yet another stinging defeat when the measures were soundly rejected by voters in a March 2008 referendum. Shortly thereafter, the Liberals left the government after Gyurcsány sacked the SZDSZ-appointed Health Minister; nonetheless, the Socialists remained in power as a minority government with external support from the Liberals. Meanwhile, Hungary's already weak economy took a sharp turn to the worse, which left the country no choice but to take a $25 billion international rescue package from the International Monetary Fund, the European Union and the World Bank.br /br /Recent opinion polls have Hungary's main opposition party, the right-of-center Fidesz-Hungarian Civic Union ahead of the Socialist Party by more than forty (40) points; not surprisingly, Fidesz continues to press for an early vote, while the Socialists are hoping that a new prime minister will turn the party's fortunes around before a general election is held by the spring of 2010 at the latest. However, barring some completely unforeseen development it is highly unlikely the Socialists will be able to overcome Fidesz's massive lead, although they could conceivably reduce it. At any rate, Fidesz's large advantage would almost certainly be amplified by the complicated electoral system used to choose members of Hungary's unicameral Parliament (reviewed in A HREF="http://electionresources.org/hu/"Elections to the Hungarian National Assembly/A), which combines French-style runoff voting in single-member constituencies with regional-level party-list proportional representation and a cumbersome top-up national list.br /br /By resorting to a constructive vote of no-confidence, which will be submitted to the National Assembly next April 6 (with a vote scheduled for April 14), Gyurcsány has left President László Sólyom out of the process. Hungary's head of state has made it clear he favors holding an early election, noting that the new prime minister would be in office for at most one year before the next general election would have to be held; nonetheless, he cannot intervene unless Gyurcsány actually resigns.br /br /In the meantime, the Socialist Party - still chaired by Gyurcsány - has proposed three candidates for prime minister: former National Bank governor György Surányi, former president of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Ferenc Glatz, and András Vértes, president of the GKI economic institute. The Liberals have already indicated their willingness to support Surányi; poll findings suggest SZDSZ could be wiped out in the next election, so the party has little appetite for an early vote. The Socialists have also been courting the moderately conservative Hungarian Democratic Forum (MDF), whose votes could prove to be crucial if they can't secure support from SZDSZ.br /br /While an early general election remains somewhat unlikely, it should be noted that voters will still go to the polls next June to choose Hungary's representatives in the European Parliament, and the outcome of that poll could be indicative of what lies ahead.div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/8991369883287712098-5896647894628243858?l=globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com'//div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/hungarian-prime-minister-gyurcsany-steps-down-now-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where the Bailout Money is Really Going</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/where-the-bailout-money-is-really-going/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/where-the-bailout-money-is-really-going/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balzac;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernie Madoff;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazilian beach;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Lenihan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerald Isle;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grassley;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Giant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil bottoming;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pPity the rich. Pity the CEOs. Pity the capitalists./p
pPoor Warren. He’s down to his last $25 billion. And Bill Gates can barely hold his head up; his pile has shrunk to barely $18 billion./p
pAnd do a Google search of “a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=AIG"AIG/a outrage” and you will get 621,000 hits./p
pAlas, being rich isn’t as easy or as much fun as it used to be./p
pThe rally paused yesterday. The Dow lost 7 points. It could be over. More likely, it will run for a few months. Gradually, people will come to think that this is the real thing. They’ll begin to imagine that it is 2003 all over again. Of course, it’s not…this market has nothing in common with the Great Rebound of 2003-2007. (More#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/where-the-bailout-money-is-really-going/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IDM Pharma, Inc. (IDMI) Announces Approval in Europe for Treatment of Patients with Non-Metastatic, Resectable Osteosarcoma</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/idm-pharma-inc-idmi-announces-approval-in-europe-for-treatment-of-patients-with-non-metastatic-resectable-osteosarcoma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/idm-pharma-inc-idmi-announces-approval-in-europe-for-treatment-of-patients-with-non-metastatic-resectable-osteosarcoma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugenie Kleinerman;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Lewis;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDM Pharma Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leeds;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liechtenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osteosarcoma;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. James University Hospital;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy P. Walbert;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=14643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IDM Pharma, Inc. announced that the European Commission has formally authorized MEPACT® (mifamurtide, L-MTP-PE) for the treatment of patients with non-metastatic, resectable osteosarcoma, a rare and often fatal bone tumor. MEPACT can now be marketed in the 27 Member States of the European Union, as well as in Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. 
&#8220;Today&#8217;s approval of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/idm-pharma-inc-idmi-announces-approval-in-europe-for-treatment-of-patients-with-non-metastatic-resectable-osteosarcoma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roubini Global Economics: Re-emergence of global protectionism</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/roubini-global-economics-re-emergence-of-global-protectionism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/roubini-global-economics-re-emergence-of-global-protectionism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prieur du Plessis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arpitha Bykere;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assets/GDP;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank credit crunch;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank defaults;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank lending activities;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank losses;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-border banking;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doha;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecuador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal stimulus package limits  sourcing infrastructure;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food shortages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign bank borrowings;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign commercial bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helped finance external accounts;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute of International Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Labor Organization;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil boom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil supply contracts;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Ziemba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy  Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade finance crunch;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO court;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/03/07/roubini-global-economics-re-emergence-of-global-protectionism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post features Nouriel Roubini's team discussing the re-emergence of global protection, saying: "As governments around the world fight rising unemployment, falling exports and bank credit crunch, and several central banks are facing liquidity traps...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/roubini-global-economics-re-emergence-of-global-protectionism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monetary Sorcery</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/monetary-sorcery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/monetary-sorcery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy makers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing         press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing currency;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy  Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zimbabwe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=14542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p class="MsoNormal"The question facing every investor today, and the one that could wield a very large influence over one’s investment fortunes – is whether deflation or inflation will hold sway during the next couple of years./p
p class="MsoNormal"To preview our conclusions: we’re betting on inflation./p
p class="MsoNormal"So what is this thing called, “inflation?”/p
p class="MsoNormal"According to the 1962 edition of Webster’s New World Dictionary, inflation is “an increase in the amount of currency in circulation or a marked expansion of credit, resulting in a fall in the value of the currency and a sharp rise in prices.” That’s the classic definition/p
p class="MsoNormal"But for those of us who are not economists, theorists or ivory tower residents, inflation is simply the thing that turns a nickel Coke into a $2#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/monetary-sorcery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gold: an investment you hope won’t pay off</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/gold-an-investment-you-hope-won%e2%80%99t-pay-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/gold-an-investment-you-hope-won%e2%80%99t-pay-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Stanczyk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gold Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akhi Kamkolkar;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Ruskin;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Stanczyk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANZ Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecuador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Burroughs;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halifax;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Claude Trichet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Pervan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Trevethan;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noah;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing press fueling sovereign risk;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPDR Gold Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen White;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapidtrends.com/blog/2009/02/27/gold-an-investment-you-hope-wont-pay-off/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:01am GMT
By Nick Trevethan - Analysis
SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Gold is rapidly becoming the last haven in a sea of uncertainty as worries rise about the ability of not only commercial banks, but even governments, to repay debts.
With few signs that the world&#8217;s worst economic crisis since the 1930s is close to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/gold-an-investment-you-hope-won%e2%80%99t-pay-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Housing Stats Show More Rot on the Housing Vine</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/housing-stats-show-more-rot-on-the-housing-vine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/housing-stats-show-more-rot-on-the-housing-vine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill gross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EverBank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HKD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koruna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nomura Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paralysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLN;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Flint;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ty Keough;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.pimco.com;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=14232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pUS$ continues to be propped up#8230;  SEK moves up vs. the US$#8230;  Japanese yen falls#8230;.  Gold prices come down #8230;                                          And Now Today#8217;s Pfennig!br /
Good day.. And good morning! It has been a while since Chuck turned over the reigns of the Pfennig to me, so I#8217;m a bit out of practice. But there was a lot of movement in the currency markets over the last 24 hours, giving me plenty of Pfennig fodder. I#8217;ll get right to it./p
pThe #8216;Safe Haven#8217; status of the US$ continued to prop it up yesterday as bad housing data in the US scared investors. Sales of previously owned homes fell 5.3% in January, after rising slightly last month. And even worse for US homeowners, the#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/housing-stats-show-more-rot-on-the-housing-vine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear John: Please tell us the truth about the economy &#8211; we can handle it</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/new-zealand/dear-john-please-tell-us-the-truth-about-the-economy-we-can-handle-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/new-zealand/dear-john-please-tell-us-the-truth-about-the-economy-we-can-handle-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Hickey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Hickey;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cluttering;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David  Beckham;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Soros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human and physical infrastructure;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Key]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealanders;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Barnett;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Institute;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Volcker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soccer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waitakere Enterprise Business Club;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.co.nz/blogs/showmethemoney/2009/02/24/dear-john-please-tell-us-the-truth-about-the-economy-we-can-handle-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s some free advice to Prime Minister John Key. I&#8217;m being a bit cheeky here, but it&#8217;s advice that&#8217;s well meant and genuine.
I&#8217;ve met Key a couple of times and was always impressed with how much he &#8220;got&#8221; New Zealand and wanted to do the right thing for the country in the long term. Sometimes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/new-zealand/dear-john-please-tell-us-the-truth-about-the-economy-we-can-handle-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And Then There’s This…Thursday, February 19th, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6thursday-february-19th-2009-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6thursday-february-19th-2009-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Franklin;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig McCarty;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enrico Orlandini;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Morgenthau;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Davidowitz;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Grandits;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precious metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Presses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prudential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santelli;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities And Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world gold council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=14006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pDespite gold#8217;s best attempts to rally in the Sydney market, a determined seller took the price down once Hong Kong opened. It rallied a bit until 1:00 p.m. in Hong Kong (midnight in New York) and then got sold off again until shortly after London opened. A rally commenced until shortly after the Comex opened#8230;and that was it for the day#8230;as gold was capped every time it tried to rally over $980. Estimated volume was 121,349 contracts, with a switch effect of 8,040./p
pSilver was similar#8230;with its top price coming at 1:00 p.m. in Hong Kong. A small rally in London was crushed#8230;as silver came under selling pressure about an hour before the Comex opened. After the Comex close, silver did#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6thursday-february-19th-2009-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europocalypse</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/europocalypse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/europocalypse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justice Litle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank losses;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brussels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheery gas lamps;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Knox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-profile finance ministers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurtz;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prague]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing         press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pyrenees;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warsaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yellow metal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=13987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pAmerica may be banged up, but Europe is teetering on the edge of flat-out fiscal disaster#8230; which helps explain the bizarre action in gold and the dollar as of late./p
pImagine a postcard-perfect mountain village. A-frame chateaus, old world door crests, cheery gas lamps – the kind of place you might see tucked away in the Pyrenees or the Swiss Alps. As a crowning touch, large flakes of snow are gently falling./p
pNow take a step back. Instead of an actual village, you are  looking at the contents of a snow globe./p
pThe snow globe is sitting on the edge of a large oak table./p
pNow you see the back of a large, well-manicured hand – perhaps a banker’s hand – accidentally sweep the#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/europocalypse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And Then There’s This…Friday, February 6th, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6friday-february-6th-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6friday-february-6th-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill gross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Far East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Presses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Walker;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bank of England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=13137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pFor at least the last two weeks, without exception, gold has been sold off the moment that Globex trading opened in the Far East. Thursday morning was no different. From there, gold and silver didn#8217;t do a thing until the usual 3:00 a.m. New York time, when a nice rally commenced in both metals. But if you note the Kitco gold chart carefully, there was some not-for-profit seller, selling this London rally every time it looked like it showed too much #8216;irrational exuberance#8217; to the upside. This happened five times during London trading. Ditto for silver. The peak in gold came about half an hour after the Comex open. From there, it got sold off until around half-past lunchtime in#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6friday-february-6th-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Latvia still headed for an early election?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/is-latvia-still-headed-for-an-early-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/is-latvia-still-headed-for-an-early-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Alvarez-Rivera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harmony Center;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivars Godmanis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Era party;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valdis Zatlers;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-396333507477123040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Manuel Alvarez-Rivera, Puerto Ricobr /br /The economy is in crisis, and expected to decline by as much as ten percent this year. The coalition government's hold on power is shaky at best, following public protests that turned violent. An embattled cabinet minister tenders his resignation. This may all sound very familiar, and it should:  recent developments in Latvia appear to be at times almost a blow-by-blow re-enactment of the events that took place in Iceland last month, which culminated in the collapse of that country's coalition government.br /br /That said, the four-party coalition cabinet of Latvian Prime Minister Ivars Godmanis remains in power for the time being, having survived a parliamentary vote of confidence on February 4. Nonetheless, an early general election - one year ahead of schedule - remains a distinct possibility: last January, President Valdis Zatlers threatened to propose dissolving Latvia's unicameral parliament - the Saeima - by March 31 unless it passed constitutional amendments that would give voters the right to propose the dissolution of the legislature.br /br /The President of Latvia is constitutionally entitled to propose the dissolution of the Saeima. A national referendum is then held on the proposal, and the Saeima is dissolved and fresh elections called if a majority of votes is cast in favor of dissolution; otherwise, the president is automatically removed from office, and the Saeima proceeds to elect a new president to serve for the remaining term of office of the removed head of state. If an early poll does indeed take place, it would be carried out under Latvia's relatively straightforward proportional representation system, reviewed in A HREF="http://electionresources.org/lv/"Elections to the Latvian Saeima (Parliament)/A (which also includes nationwide- and constituency-level results of the 1998, 2002 and 2006 parliamentary elections).br /br /As in Iceland, there is widespread discontent with the political establishment, although that sentiment appears to run far deeper in Latvia: recent surveys indicate trust in government has fallen to its lowest levels since 1996 - only one in ten residents of Latvia is satisfied with the government's work - while a Latvijas Fakti poll taken last January shows that just two opposition parties - the pro-Russian Harmony Center and the populist New Era Party - stand above the five percent threshold required to secure parliamentary representation.br /br /However, even if such an extreme outcome were to actually occur - the poll numbers were skewed by a very large number of respondents (fifty-four percent) that were undecided or indicated they wouldn't vote - it would be in keeping with persistent trends in Latvian post-independence electoral politics, in which every parliamentary election brings a different winner from the preceding vote, along with a wave of usually drastic changes in the party composition of the Saeima.br /br /Governments in Latvia are usually short-lived - since regaining independence in 1991, the Baltic republic has had more than a dozen cabinets - in no small measure because of its constantly changing and fractious party system. From that perspective, the question may be not so much whether Prime Minister Godmanis will remain in power, but for how long.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/is-latvia-still-headed-for-an-early-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emerging Market Debt Crunch Looms&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/emerging-market-debt-crunch-looms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/emerging-market-debt-crunch-looms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Maher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltic states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kazakhstan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1897020887579135393.post-6004827682906461798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div align="justify"I warned of the bubble in emerging market economies and assets last Summer but it seems that investors are still complacent regarding the risks of ongoing contagion from the credit crisis leading to widespread default. emstrongJust this week we have seen Kazakhstan devalue its currency by 18% and Russian sovereign debt downgraded by Fitch to BBB/strong/em with a negative outlook. Unless markets (and commodity prices) improve fast, emstrongRussia could well run out of reserves within two years. /strong/emAs shown in the charts below, the country has $60bn of foreign debt maturing in 2009 alone, amid a slump in the Ruble. Is this 1998 redux? As I noted last August in a href="http://deadcatsbouncing.blogspot.com/2008/08/russian-roulette-could-moscow-spread.html"span style="color:#cc0000;"Russian Roulette/span/a, the hubris being shown by the Putin regime politically and Russian oligarchs financially was a classic prelude to collapse. /divdiv align="justify"emstrongTaiwan, Mexico (/strong/emwhich is on the verge of anarchy, see a href="http://deadcatsbouncing.blogspot.com/2008/09/mexico-next-failed-state.html"span style="color:#cc0000;"Mexico: Running out of Oil and Options/span/aemstrong), Korea and Turkey all face huge external refinancing demands this year/strong/em. Among smaller nations, Dubai has run up relatively huge external debts to recreate itself as a kitsch tourist playground and looks likely to need a bailout from its neighbours. External debt falling due for imminent repayment is one way of looking at sovereign debt risk, but another is to look at the foreign liabilities/wholesale funding needs of the domestic banking system. On this basis, the Baltic states, Iceland, Colombia, the Ukraine and Kazakhstan all look extremely vulnerable. emstrongAnd who is most exposed to a domino default scenario in emerging market debt? European banks who carry over $500bn of exposure/strong/em on their books, and by implication the Euro. span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"strongemThis article continues at /em/strong/spana href="http://deadcatsbouncing.blogspot.com/2008/08/russian-roulette-could-moscow-spread.html"span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;color:#990000;"strongemwww.deadcatsbouncing.com/em/strong/span/aspan style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"strongem /em/strong/span/divbr /a href="http://deadcatsbouncing.blogspot.com/2008/08/russian-roulette-could-moscow-spread.html"/abr /br /br /a href="http://deadcatsbouncing.blogspot.com/2008/08/russian-roulette-could-moscow-spread.html"/adiv class="feedflare"
a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=xJQo1b.Q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=xJQo1b.Q" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=oDHcD6.Q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=oDHcD6.Q" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=Dba9bj.Q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=Dba9bj.Q" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=fCRsXk.Q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=fCRsXk.Q" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=d5xhkq.q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=d5xhkq.q" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=s1yWoj.q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=s1yWoj.q" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?a=NJDCo4.Q"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets?i=NJDCo4.Q" border="0"/img/a
/divimg src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DeadCatsBouncingMusingsOnTheMarkets/~4/531615939" height="1" width="1"/]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/emerging-market-debt-crunch-looms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five reasons why Alan Bollard should not have cut the OCR</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/new-zealand/five-reasons-why-alan-bollard-should-not-have-cut-the-ocr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/new-zealand/five-reasons-why-alan-bollard-should-not-have-cut-the-ocr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Hickey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Bollard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home buyer;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rates;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard and Poor's Ratings Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.co.nz/blogs/showmethemoney/2009/01/29/five-reasons-why-alan-bollard-should-not-have-cut-the-ocr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s five reasons why Reserve Bank governor Alan Bollard should have held the Official Cash Rate at 5% this morning, rather than the 150-basis-point cut to 3.5% he delivered.
1. We have a savings problem.

The best way to encourage savings is to keep interest rates above 5% at least. A lot of people forget there&#8217;s about [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/new-zealand/five-reasons-why-alan-bollard-should-not-have-cut-the-ocr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Latvia Needs To Devalue Soon &#8211; A Reply To Christoph Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/why-latvia-needs-to-devalue-soon-a-reply-to-christoph-rosenberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/why-latvia-needs-to-devalue-soon-a-reply-to-christoph-rosenberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Alvarez-Rivera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltic states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bailout plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank problems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank restructuring;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by-product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabinet of Ministers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrisoph;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christoph Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claus Vistesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit ratings agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czech Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eastern europe economy watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emThe government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal tools;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenfield site;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungarian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF loan facility;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inevitable bank losses;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insolvency law;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Orchard;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LVL;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Stokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Tripartite Co-operation Council;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nils Melngailis;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parex;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy solutions;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swedish Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology ladder;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time horizon./ppThe bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyre rubber;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Europe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1443720106009957151.post-4880981900387477966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IMF Senior Regional Representative For Central Europe and the Baltics, Christoph Rosenberg, recently a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/euro-monitor/254975/why_the_imf_supports_the_latvian_currency_peg"took me to task on RGE Monitor about my Latvian devaluation proposal/a (as did a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/economonitor-monitor/254905/devaluation_in_latvia_why_not"RGE's own Mary Stokes/a), and I would like now to take a closer look at some of the points they raise.br /br /In the first place, I would like to say that I obviously regard both Chrisoph and Mary as excellent economists, and I was in no way refering to them when I said that arguing in favour of sticking to the present currency peg constitutes trying to justify “virtually the unjustifiable” according to “the implicit consensus among thinking economists.” I do still hold that the consensus is with me, but that certainly does not mean I regard those who differ from me as "unthinking", and certainly hope I didn't give the impression that I was. And with that little "mea culpa", let combat begin.br /br /And what better way to do this than by looking at Christoph's own arguments, (see below, and I hope I am being fair), although before I actually get into this part, let me "fast forward" to what I see as the three central issues involved: the timing and duration of the correction (that we all agree is needed), the role of Latvia's special demographics, and the distribution of the impact of the eventual debt restructuring between external stakeholders (the EU fiscal structure and the foreign banks) and Latvian state finances.br /br /strongV Shaped or U Shaped?/strongbr /br /As I see it, some of the force of Christoph and Mary's argument lies in the idea that there is little possibility of Latvia being able to succesfully carry out a V shaped correction at the present time due to the hostile global environment, thus it is better (my words not theirs') for Latvia to "mark time" to some extent between now and (say) 2012 (when possibly the external environment will be returning to some sort of normality, again my feeling, not theirs), and I understand the force of this point, I really do, it's just that I don't think Latvia's social fabric will be able to withstand the sort of pressure it is going to be put under (and a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/euro-monitor/255121/violence_erupts_in_latvia"Edward Harrison has already highlighted this part/a, as I have in my longer post a href="http://globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com/2009/01/long-and-difficult-road-to-wage-cuts-as.html"on the difficulties associated with introducing generalised wage reductions/a). The IMF report on the Stand-By Arrangement stresses time and again that political consensus is vital to carrying through the proposed "fixed-peg correction", and yet it seems as if a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/euro-monitor/255306/political_unrest_on_the_rise_in_economically_troubled_hotspots"we are already running into difficulties on this front/a.br /br /br /Also, and to try to keep this simple and as non-technical as possible, we are simply dealing here with trade offs, trade offs between the accumulation of bankruptcy and non-performing loans on the one hand, and the attraction of new FDI for manufacturing industry and getting growth through exports moving on the other. The trick is to get the balance right.br /br /Now the U shaped recovery puts greater weight on the former, while the V shape one puts it on the latter, and I think the choice is as simple as that really. But I would also add in a further factor (to be explored a little more below), and this is the cost of waiting (there is strongalways/strong a cost to waiting) in terms of the demographic transition Latvia is living through (I am thinking about both out-migration and the impact of population ageing and Latvia's declining potential labour force). I suspect that part of the difference between us lies in the fact that Christoph and I attach different values to the cost of waiting in the Latvian case, and the roots of this difference lie, at least in part, on the differing theoretical frameworks we are using. To be blunt, I do not live in what I consider to be the rather timeless and abstract world of neo-classical steady-state growth and convergence theory (for all of which we have precious little meaningful empirical evidence across the EU27), but in the real historical time of ageing and shrinking populations, non-linear growth trajectories and windows of opportunity.br /br /Latvia has between now and 2020 to get rich before it gets starts to accumulate so many age-dependency-related on-costs that it may, if it doesn't put in a well-founded spurt now, quite simply never close the gap. So Latvia is living in real historical time, and not an abstract theoretical one, and in the former, if you don't seize the opportunities you are offered with both hands, then you may well simply end up as tyre rubber on the highway of history, enjoying momentary fame only to end up as a historical irrelevance. So although history doesn't simply keep repeating itself in a simple circular (or Poincaréan) fashion, tragedy is always tragedy, whether it is the first, second, third or nth time round.br /br /But perhaps "marking time" isn't really a fair analogy either, since obviously Christoph feels that the time in question can be put to good use - implementing structural reforms, rewriting the bankruptcy law to make debt restructuring easier, reducing wages and prices, etc, etc - but my worry is that all this will take place against a strongly contractionary atmosphere, with strong reductions not only in real GDP but also in nominal GDP - I mean if we are talking about a 5% plus contraction in real GDP, and (let's say, just as an example) a 3% reduction in the general price level, then we are talking about a drop of about 8% in the nominal value of GDP in 2009, and about another very large one in 2010, so let's be clear, these are contractions of a large order of magnitude (not far off the US 1930 - 33 ones) and my most serious doubt is about the ability of the Latvian social consensus to hold together through this, especially if there is no visible improvement in general conditions as a result. You need some sort of carrot, and not just good will.br /br /strongWage freezes Are more Palatable than Wage Cutsbr //strongbr /Now it may seem strange to adduce arguments from evolutionary psychology (not Evolutionary Psychology, please note) in a debate about macro economic policy, but I do feel that years and years of evolution have left us with a kind of asymmetric bias which means while we definitely (always and everywhere) don't like to see our wages and salaries actually cut, we have much less resistance to them being eaten away by price inflation (again, this is the whole point of Keynes's little tract "How To Pay For The War" - its just that this war is an economic and not a military one). So politically, it is easier in principle to maintain consensus around a devaluation which followed by tight controls on income, than it is to cut people's salaries outright. Another example which illustrates my point here comes from the recent German experience, where real wage deflation was effected over a number of years (1995 - 2005), and export competitiveness restored, by maintaining a wage freeze, and getting people (during the most significant part of this process) to agree to work more hours for the same money. But to do this in Latvia you need to be able to expand output and add jobs, which is why devaluation is, in my opinion, highly desireable. You cannot expect people to work for the same money and longer hours, and agree to the chap working next to them being dispatched off to the employment offices, things just aren't that simple in the real world.br /br /br /The bicycle is must easier to keep stable if you peddle forwards.br /br /strongThe Demographics Clinch It/strongbr /br /br /br /br /pa href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU6x87sGovI/AAAAAAAAL1k/EnvJlub7-Io/s1600-h/latvia+population.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282355073325114098" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 174px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU6x87sGovI/AAAAAAAAL1k/EnvJlub7-Io/s320/latvia+population.png" border="0" //a /pbr /pSo this brings me to the biggest problem I have to the whole U shaped correction idea in the Latvian context. I will readily agree with Christoph when he says that the Latvian labour force is extremely nimble, and indeed it is especially so when it comes to packing its bags and heading off in the direction of the frontier in search of work abroad. In fact it is so nimble that it manages to do this without the Latvian statistical office even noting that the people have gone, that's how nimble they are.br //ppSo this is the outcome I really fear most, the one which means that when Latvia does eventually start to recover, this recovery will only take place with a time lag, and in the wake of an expansion in some key West European (and especially Nordic) economies, which will mean that their will be another loss of workforce in the slipstream their take off will create, a loss which can become a very serious drag on future growth, and indeed may well restrict even further the inflation-free level of sustainable growth for the entire Latvian economy. The chart below, which compares the Irish and the Latvian wage distributions comes from an earlier period (and indeed was prepared by the IMF itself), but it does give some idea of the problem, since there is a clear wage slope running across Europe from east to West, and much needed Latvian workers have an unfortunate tendency of trying to climb their way up it.br /br /(please click over image for better viewing)br /br //pa onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/RnrXR5IXIbI/AAAAAAAAAWE/wd9rpOvxEmQ/s1600-h/latvia+and+Ireland+wages.jpg"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5078608232207294898" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: pointer; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/RnrXR5IXIbI/AAAAAAAAAWE/wd9rpOvxEmQ/s400/latvia+and+Ireland+wages.jpg" border="0" //abr /So the situation envisaged in the "fixed-peg correction" - namely a period of negative economic growth and substantial wage contraction - will probably only produce yet another round of out-migration (although this time, in all probabity, it won't be to Ireland) which will in turn makes the domestic wage correction even more difficult to implement (another kind of 'vicious loop'). It is interesting to note that the IMF were raising this sort of issue with the Latvian authorities during the earlier overheating phase, but the Latvian solution (which prevailed at the time) was really to tolerate higher than desireable wage increases in order to disuade Latvians from leaving. So there is prior evidence that whatever the promises (and even, lets be generous, the good intentions) local governments find it very hard to stand in the path of their voters when these want social improvemnt, and indeed such vulnerability could come from the most compassionate and noble of motives, the problem is these are simply misplaced.br /br /strongDebt Restructuring A key Problem/strongbr /br /Here (see below) is the IMF Structural Roadmap a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?sk=22586.0"as it appears in the latest report/a, and as can be seen, there is a heavy emphasis on the legislative changes needed to carry out the debt restructuring, which gives some idea of the important role this played in the decision making process.br /br /blockquote• Cabinet of Ministers to adopt decision that reforms controls over budget execution (December 31, 2008).br /• Adopt operational guidelines clarifying procedures for provision of emergency liquidity assistance (December 31, 2008).br /• National Tripartite Co-operation Council will establish a Committee to Promote Wage Restraint (January 31, 2009).br /• Review and, if necessary, revise regulations on emergency liquidity support (January 31, 2009)br /• Complete focused examination of the banking system (March 31, 2009).br /• Develop comprehensive debt restructuring strategy (April 30, 2009).br /• Amend banking laws to give FCMC, BoL and Government powers to restore financial stability in case of systemic crisis (June 30, 2009).br /• Adopt an amendment to the Budget and Financial Management law to strengthen financial responsibility, transparency and accountability (June 30, 2009).br /• Amend insolvency law to facilitate orderly and efficient debt restructurings (June 30, 2009)./blockquotepI have to say that I am really rather surprised at a numberof the things I found on reading a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?sk=22586.0"the IMF report /ain detail. In particular I discovered that the true size of the 2009 annual fiscal deficit is going to be 17.3% and not the "mere" 4.9% that appears in the final budget accounts. This is not a problem of "massaging" (I am not suggesting that) but a by-product of the cost of bank restructuring - which involves recapitalisation and the acquisition of "troubled assets" - and these costs, under the new accounting rules, are classified as held to maturity, and not marked to market in terms of their valuation, nor, under the present convention do such liabilities appear as part of the headline fiscal deficit number. /ppNonethless Latvia's gross public debt is now set to rise, and dramatically. It is set to go up from 8.3% of GDP in 2007, to 14.3% in 2008 and to an estimated 46% in 2010. And this is all basically to pay for the bank bailout (which is estimated by the IMF to be likely to cost of $1.868 billon in 2009) and not in order to address issues in the broader economic crisis.br /br /The worrying part of all this is that if we don't get the best case scenario, and find ourselves, for example) not with a U- but with an L- shaped non-recovery, then this debt to GDP (and indeed even the annual fiscal deficit itself) may start to head above the EU 60% and 3% rules in 2011 or 2012, thus putting in jeopardy the IMF's own exit strategy for Latvia of eurozone membership. The IMF themselves go to some length to point out that the best case outcome critically depends on maintaining a political will which (as we are starting to see) may not be so strong as they were lead to believe at the time of making the agreement.br /br /The problem is that Latvia, apart from the internal credit boom, and the consequent housing bust and real economy contraction which follows (and which all three Baltic states "enjoyed" actually stands out from its Baltic peers in that it also became something of an offshore financial centre during the boom years. That is to say, there are shades of the Iceland or UK problem in the Latvian situation. I quote the IMF document:br /br /"Finally, standard debt sustainability analysis may not capture all of Latvia's characteristics, given its dependence on foreign bank borrowing for credit intermediation and its role as an offshore financial centre. First, Latvia's net foreign debt is much lower (around 70 percent of GDP), as it reinvests many of the non-resident deposits in assets overseas. The value and liquidity of these assets then becomes key. Second, much of its foreign borrowing is backed by domestic assets. Thus external debt sustainability will depend on whether these assets recover value and will be able to generate future returns to service the debt."br /br /As I read it, this means that Latvia is a miniture version of Iceland or the UK, and that as well as a macro consumption boom/bust disaster there is a non-domestic-loan recovery problem inside the banking system of some magnitude. As the IMF itself says the value and liquidity of Latvia's overseas assets is one of the "keys" to the problem. The other "key" depends on whether or not domestic assets recover their earlier value, an outcome which given even the internal price deflation strategy proposed by the IMF seems fairly unlikely, at least over the relevant time horizon./ppThe bank restructuring component is so expensive largely because the Latvian owned Parex bank (assets equivalent to more than 20% of GDP) was taken over by the government following a run on deposits and the consequent need to avoid default on the 775 million euros ($1 billion) of syndicated credits due in 2009. In fact the problems at Parex were one of the main reasons Latvia went to the IMF and EU for financial help in the first place - since in theory the issuers of the syndicated credit had the right to demand repayment of the debt immediately following a change in ownership at the bank, and the government needed the institutional support to be able to renegotiate and rollover the debt.br /br /As a result the Latvian authorities have been able to issue guarantee for the refinancing of isyndicated loans of EUR775 million due in 2009 (EUR275 million in February and EUR500 million in June). The credit ratings agencies, and in particular Fitch, believe that in the current global economic climate a rapid future sale of the bank difficult and that the government will have increasing difficulty in the future refinancing the syndicated loans. Moreover, the risk of further deposit withdrawals from Parex bank, especially by non-residents, will continue despite the effective nationalisation of the bank.br /br /The new Parex chairman Nils Melngailis was a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/privateEquityFinancialServicesAndRealEstate/idUSLB33129320081211"quoted recently as saying/a that the bank's value was anywhere between 2 lats ($3.65), the price the state paid to buy out the two previous owners, and 600 million euros. /ppIf all this is correct, then my guess is that we could even be eventually looking at the possibility of a Latvian sovereign default. I mean, personally speaking, I am pretty sure the medicine the IMF are administering just won't work (for the reasons I am putting forward) and that things will deteriorate. But sovereign default something I would never have imagined before I started digging a bit deeper into the whole situation. And the IMF should seriously be thinking about this. Latvia's level of public debt was previously very low, and then whooosh. Fitch seem to share this view, since they have maintained their negative outlook following last November's downgrade./pblockquoteFitch Ratings has today downgraded the Republic ofLatvia's long-term foreign currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR)to 'BBB-' (BBB minus) from 'BBB', Long-term local currency IDRto 'BBB' from 'BBB+' and Country Ceiling to 'A-' (A minus) from'A'. The Short-term foreign currency IDR is affirmed at 'F3'.In addition, Fitch has placed Latvia's sovereign ratings onRating Watch Negative (RWN)./blockquotepbr /br /br //pa href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SX-IRFyv1dI/AAAAAAAAMZo/x_gK48k2DvA/s1600-h/latvia+median+age.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5296101514005173714" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 224px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SX-IRFyv1dI/AAAAAAAAMZo/x_gK48k2DvA/s400/latvia+median+age.png" border="0" //abr /br /Soon enough Latvia will have to face all the on-costs of pensions, health etc for the growing numbers of old people as the median age rises (see chart above). Claus Vistesen and I are busily trying to "calibrate" things here, since notionally Latvia's median age is a lot younger (41) than that of Japan, Italy or Germany (43). But then, on the other hand, Latvians live on average ten years less. So people stop working earlier, and since the really large health care costs are during the last 5 years of life, and this doesn't change substantially if those involved are between 65 and 70 or between 80 and 85. So there is an ageing "calibration" issue here - one which non of the multilateral agencies involved have yet taken on board as far as I can see. Also we need to move the saving and borrowing age ranges around a bit when we come to think about the life cycle (to adjust for shorter working lives etc).br /br /And this "just where is all the money from the loans going" issue is a much bigger question than simply a Latvian one. The IMF original loan to Hungary, for example, included HUF 600 billion (about 20% of the total loan) to be allocated to bank bailout plans, 50% of which was earmarked for capital injections while the other 50% was to be used for state guarantees for commercial banks. The government later boosted this HUF 300 billion guarantee fund to HUF 1,500 billion, however today it has been announced that more of the IMF loan facility may be used to back loans right up to the 1,500 billion HUF level - which surely gives us an indication of the severity of the problems they are having. But what concerns us here is that as a result of these and other measures Hungarian debt to GDP is now projected to rise (Januarry 2009 EU Commission forecast) from approximately 65% in 2009 to 79% in 2010, and of course there can be downside (or if you prefer, upside) on this. So both Hungary and Latvia look dead set to me to receive further credit downgrades, downgrades which will only serve to materially worsen the situation. And thus there is a considerable danger of a self-perpetuating downward spiral, especially if due to the weighting towards the bank problems the present package of measures simply don't work. People are vastly overestimating the power of longer term structural reforms in the context of such a sharp downturn. All very troubling.br /br /br /strongDeflation A Problem?/strongbr /p/ppAlso, there is another fundamental reason for devaluation, and that is the ability to regain control over an independent monetary policy, since handling a sharp and sudden deflationary shock may well be much harder with a fixed-wheel lock-in to the ECB benchmark rate. Ben Bernanke himself gave us a good example of how the sort of debt deflation process to which Latvia is going to be subjected works in practice, and why it is so dangerous in a modern economic context) a href="http://www.princeton.edu/svensson/und/522/Readings/Bernanke.pdf"in an early paper he wrote on Japan/a.br /br /emTo take an admittedly extreme case, suppose that the borrower’s loan (taken out prior to 1992) was still outstanding in 1999 , and that at loan initiation he had expected a 2.5% annual rate of increase in the GDP deflator and a 5% annual rate of increase in land prices. Then by 1999 the real value of his principal obligation would be 22% higher, and the real value of his collateral some 42% lower, then he anticipated when he took out the loan. These adverse balance-sheet effects would certainly impede the borrower’s access to new credit and hence his ability to consume or make new investments. The lender, faced with a non-performing loan and the associated loss in financial capital, might also find her ability to make new loans to be adversely affected. This example illustrates why one might want to consider indicators other than the current real interest rate—-for example, the cumulative gap between the actual and the expected price level—-in assessing the effects of monetary policy. It also illustrates why zero inflation or mild deflation is potentially more dangerous in the modern environment than it was, say, in the classical gold standard era. The modern economy makes much heavier use of credit, especially longer term. Further, unlike the earlier period, rising prices are the norm and are reflected in nominal-interest-rate setting to a much greater degree. Although deflation was often associated with weak business conditions in the nineteenth century, the evidence favors the view that deflation or even zero inflation is far more dangerous today than it was a hundred years ago./embr /br /And it seems Lavia is now about to enter a sustained period of price and wage deflation (and thus loan to income inflation) with no monetary and no fiscal tools to attack the problem.br /br //ppstrongOK, Now for Christoph's pointsbr //strongbr /1/ ema devaluation in Latvia would have severe regional contagion effects/em. I think that on this point we are all in basic agreement. On my view, the EU and the IMF need a coherent common strategy to address the whole situation in the East (at least across those countries who form part of the EU), and I think we are rapidly getting past the point where problems can be dealt with on a piecemeal basis. I mean. clearly some of the points here post date our earlier debate, but part of the foundation of my initial argument was that the whole situation was at risk of becoming so serious that nothing less than a concerted regional initiative would have the credibility and the robustness to work. It may be that outright eurosisation of the entire group maybe the only viable way to go, but I need to argue this separately and substantially, so I will not go into this further here). But, be that as it may, the leading question is that even if eurosiation is to be contemplated, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and Bulgaria all need to come of their pegs and lower the parity at which they would enter, and even if the situation in each case is different, the problem is going to be the same, so my underlying point would be better to do this in a cordinated way, and indeed the decision by the Hungarian government to come off their band back in May could be seen as a first step in just this direction.br /br /This is doubly the case since when we talk about regional consequences, we can also talk about the regional effects of a strong devaluation of the UK pound, the Swedish krona, the Russian ruble, the Ukrainian hryvnia, the Czech koruna, the Hungarian forint, and the Polish zloty. Basically the economies in all the aforementioned countries all face a similar problem - domestic demand is down and they need to export, and they are all addressing this by the application of a mixture of devaluation and price deflation, and basically I don't see why the Baltics should be so different, and why we (or at least the IMF, the WB and the EU) don't treat the three Baltic states as one single group here.br /br /3/ emLatvia’s preference for the peg is strongly supported by all foreign stakeholders, including the EU and its Nordic neighbors..........it seems unlikely that they will cut their losses and pull out, as Japanese banks did during the Asian crisis./em Well, this is certainly the case, but it is not at all clear that these stakeholders could not be brought over to a devaluation strategy. There is currently a lively debate going on in Sweden about just how much responsibility the Swedish government and monetary authorities should accept in the context of what is happening in the Baltics (a href="http://www.balticbusinessnews.com/Default2.aspx?ArticleID=74b58ea8-76b7-46ed-acb2-286631e4a81bamp;open=sec"see here/a, and a href="http://www.balticbusinessnews.com/Default2.aspx?ArticleID=bdd51c19-f912-4a0f-b57c-d007fb49426c"here/a), and more significantly, the a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssFinancialServicesAndRealEstateNews/idUSLI39362320081218"Group Of Ten West European banks /awith most exposure to the CEE economies has started to lobby for an initiative from the ECB and the EU Commission to address the problem of the inevitable bank losses (since I take it we are agreed that the defaults will be no less on the internal deflation approach, and may well, as Krugman suggests, be greater as those who have borrowed in local currency are also forced into default).br /br /4/ emA devaluation would not significantly reduce Latvia’s external financing needs./em I am not sure about this. Obviously a devaluation which was sharp enough to remove all further worries about future devaluations would take a lot of pressure off the country's reserves. The shrinkage in the CA deficit would also, as you say, help a little, as would the fact that internal saving would start to improve domestic liquidity.br /br /While it would shrink the current account deficit further, private sector roll-over rates might not improve because the higher external debt to GDP ratio would likely result in credit agency downgrades to junk status and trigger the immediate repayment of most syndicated loans. I completely accept this point, but assume that the devaluation strategy would need to be accompanied by a loan restructuring package. Evidently this will be necessary in any event, on the devaluation variant they restructuring will come sooner, but against the difficulties this may present for a Latvian legal framework which is ill equipped to address the problems which will arise can be offset the advantages of getting all the bad news out of the way early.br /br /5/ emthere are advantages to a U-shaped adjustment via factor price compression over the V-shaped recovery that is often associated with a devaluation...../emChristoph makes the entirely valid point thatem /emLatvia’s banks (both domestic and foreign owned) and its legal system are at this point quite uprepared for the sort of stress a comprehensive debt restucturing process would put them under. By drawing the process of bankruptcies and nonperforming loan accumulation out a bit, Christoph argues, the authorities may well buy time to improve the country’s insolvency regime, strengthen banks’ capital base and allow private debt restructuring.br /br /Well, this is essentially the same set of issues as in argument 4. There are advantages in drawing out the bankruptcy process, but against these advantages need to be offset the problems posed by reform fatigue, as people are asked to sacrifice over a long period with no visible benefits to see for their effort. And there is no guarantee that the towel won't simply have to be thrown in at the end of the day on the U shaped recession, with a hasty devaluation being carried out, and the U being converted into a UL, with the bounce back only coming much later.br /br /6/ emit is questionable whether a devaluation would quickly boost exports, given the global environment and the structure of its exports/em. emRe-orienting the economy towards tradables will require structural reforms which are envisaged in the program/em. Basically, I think we are back to the "waiting room" approach again here. Export lead growth is not really a credible option at the moment, so the argument goes, given that the external conditions are extremely unfavourable, and that Latvia's economy is dominated by non-tradeables, financial services and construction. All of this is undoubtedly true, but my argument is that you have to start somewhere, and may own view is that it is better to start tomorrow, rather than the day after, and I think the key to breaking the logjam is attracting greenfield site FDI, but to do this you need to get your operating costs down, and the V shape correction achieves this outcome quicker than the U shaped one.br /br /7/em Latvia has a very flexible economy, especially a quite nimble labor market/em. Really I don't know what to make of this argument, since if this is the case, why was it not more evident during the years of dramatic wage inflation. Wage cuts of up to 25 percent do seem, as Christoph says, large, but so does the tripling of nominal wages between 2001-07 (doubling in real terms), and unless we get to grips with why all that happened in the first place (that is we take a good look at what may be the real Latvian capacity growth rate without inward migration) then I feel I remain unconvinced that we are suddenly about to see a newborn agility in the Latvian labour market. What I see are rather labour market rigidities, and a resistance to change.span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"/p/spanblockquotespan style="FONT-STYLE: italic"Some analysts called for expanding inward migration to alleviate shortages and dampen wage pressures. However, policymakers generally considered that this would have the effect of replacing domestic low-cost workers with imported ones, thereby holding down wages and promoting further emigration./span emThe government argues that rapid wage convergence with western Europe is needed to check emigration./em - IMF Staff Report, 2006br //blockquotestrongConclusions And Exit Strategy/strongbr /br /pbr /So where does all this leave us? Well basically that what we have on our hands is one hell of a mess, and that here there are no easy solutions. Did anyone tell you we lived in an imperfect world? Well what is going on in Latvia is surely as good an illustration that you are likely to find that this is the indeed the case. There are no easy, quickfix, policy solutions, and I fully understand Christoph's dilemma, and the difficulty associated with decision taking in this case./ppBut, while nothing is guaranteed to work, some approaches may turn out to be better placed than others, and it is my considered opinion that the best way of addressing the Latvian problem is by trying to kick-start the economy via devaluation, and to then tackle the wage increase problem by explicitly opening Latvia's frontiers to external migrant labour (as, for example, the Czech Republic have, to some extent, done). Such devaluation, backed by imaginative enough greenfield site support from the government, could attract the FDI, and alongside it the migrants to provide the manpower for unskilled positions, with better educated Latvians being able to get involved in some of the higher value work. If something is not done to break the population vicious circle, and the meltdown in internal demand and property prices as young Latvians seek work elsewhere then the outcome is all too clear, although not for that any less tragic, as Krugman suggests./ppOf course, some may wish to object at this point that devaluation has the same effect on wages as wage cuts do, and they would be right, but the point is strongthe overall level of economic activity is greater on the V shaped approach/strong (this was Keynes', and is today Bernanke's, basic insight). Latvian GDP is about to be thrown, from a period of trying to operate above capacity, to one where for an extended period of time it will operate below capacity. This can never be a good solution. On the V shaped recovery scenario the strongtime path of GDP is higher/strong, and the possibility of finding remunerative employment for each and every individual Latvian is to that extent greater. More idle resources will be put to work at a time when there is huge slack in the global system, and energy and material costs are at very low levels. Investment (building factories etc, buying machinery and equipment) simply couldn't be cheaper . Putting the resources to work to make this possible quite simply can't be a bad thing, or so I contend, and certainly not if the alternative may be sitting back and waiting till you have a sovereign default coming crashing in on top of you. /ppI see plenty of work for Latvian parliamentarians (passing much needed laws etc) in the current proposals but I see comparatively few initiatives which will keep the idle hands of Latvia's valuable human resource base from freezing over. /ppLet us be clear, of course there is no single clear "cure all" remedy here, but I think we need to say strongly that the earlier attempt to stem the migrant out-flow by being lax on the wage inflation front was to invite disaster (and the disaster of course came), whereas now, excessively compressing wages as the solution will have the impact which was previously feared./pstrongExport Defeatism?br //strongbr /pOne of the biggest obstacles facing countries like Latvia at the present time (of course Latvia is far from being unique, Latvia is simply the "canary in the coalmine") is a kind of passive defeatism about exports. Of course, Christoph is completely right, the global environment coundn't be more unfavourable, but there really is plenty to be done, so why not keep warm during those long dark winters doing some of it. The EU Commission points out the problem in its latest forecast:/pblockquotepExports are still dominated by commodity products and re exports, with only limited evidence of moving up the technology ladder. Hence, export revenues are exposed to volatile global commodity price developments (mainly prices of wood and metals). Furthermore, unfavourable real exchange rate developments (based e.g. on unit wage costs in manufacturing) had a negative effect on the external competitiveness of the economy. However, a recovery of exports in the first part of 2007 was driven by manufactured goods which stood at odds not only with the above described problems of the supply side, but also with the reportedly very low increase in manufacturing output in the same period. The overall conclusion on progress in strengthening the supply side is therefore mixed, but it can be concluded that the current domestic cost developments pose serious challenges to producers of tradeable goods and services. EU Commission, January 2009 Latvia Forecastbr //p/blockquotebr /pFinally Christoph has one additional point which really serves as a conclusion and a monument to all this, and that is the idea that emLatvia has a clear exit strategy from its currency predicament: euro adoption./em /ppAs Christoph says, the Latvian authorities are determined to work to meet the Maastricht criteria in 2012. Certainly entering the euro zone will not do away - at a click of the finger - with the hard lifting necessary to address the competitiveness and high external debt problems (as he suggests in his a href="http://www.imf.org/external/np/vc/2008/022008.htm"avoiding the Portuguese trap article/a, and I go through in my a href="http://globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com/2009/01/portugal-sustains.html"Portugal Sustains post here/a). But it would offer support to a struggling Latvia and help bring back investor confidence. The point is, at which exchange rate should Latvia enter ERM2? Indeed, it is now apparent - if you read the a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?sk=22586.0"IMF staff report on the standby arrangement/a, on their website, that they favoured an expansion of the band to 15% (which basically means 15% devaluation) and it was the EU itself who objected and pushed to retain the peg (see appendix below). It is not difficult to see the problems a Latvian devaluation might face in the light of the Parex related issues without direct euroisation (or EU fiscal support), but the thrust of my argument here has been that these difficulties (credit rating downgrades, sovereign default vulnerability) are going to come anyway. Indeed Latvia had its foreign-credit rating cut to Baa1 by Moodys on January 7 2009, the second such downgrade in three months, with the agency citing increased risks of a prolonged economic decline (read L shaped recession). /pblockquote“The downgrade reflects the further intensification of the economic adjustment in Latvia since October 2008,” said Kenneth Orchard, an analyst with Moody’s, in the statement. “The economic downturn is now expected to be deeper and more prolonged than previously assumed.” The risk of a “disorderly correction” to economic imbalances remains even after securing the 7.5 billion-euro ($10.2 billion) international aid package. “Government borrowing will rise significantly over the next few years to smooth the adjustment and prevent a major economic crisis,”/blockquotepBasically, the EU objected to the IMF proposal for emergency eurozone membership on the grounds that this would sat a precedent in other cases. But I really do feel that the Commission (and the ECB presumeably) are being ridiculously pig-headed here. We have an emergency on our hands, and exceptional measures are called for.br /br /It is impossible for me to go here into all the issues involved in collective membership of the eurozone for the EU12 states that are not already in, but let me just say we need a substantial rethink allround, involving:/ppa) Issuing EU bonds to collectively fund bank bailouts across the Union (East and West)br /b) Collective membership of the eurozone for those EU member states who want itbr /c) A new Lisbon Strategy and Stability and Growth Pact code involving much stricter conditions and stronger Commission powers and sanctions.br /br /c) is the necessary and prior condition for giving consideration to (a) and (b) and not the other way round. /ppFinally, thank you, one and all, who have struggled forward and reached this point. In particular thank you for being so patient with my verbal largesse. I am trying to contain it, I really am.br /br /strongAppendix: Extracts From IMF Staff Report On Latvian Request for Stand-By Arrangementbr //strongbr /emThe authorities and staff examined the merits of alternative exchange rate regimes. A widening of the exchange rate band to ±15 percent (as permitted under ERM2; currently Latvia has unilaterally adopted a ±1 percent band) would result in a larger initial output decline, since adverse balance sheet effects would reduce domestic demand. However, competitiveness would improve more quickly, reducing the current account deficit and fostering a more rapid economic recovery. The case for changing the parity would be stronger if it could be accompanied by immediate euro adoption. Technically, this would address many of the risks described above, and give Latvia deeper access to capital markets. With its negligible public sector debt, the government would also find it easier to borrow in euros on international capital markets. However, the EU authorities have firmly ruled out this option, given its inconsistency with the Maastricht Treaty and the precedents it would set for other potential euro area entrants./embr /br /br /emThe main advantage of widening the bands is that it should eventually deliver a faster economic recovery. Although growth would be depressed in the short run by balance-sheet effects (see below), the economy might then bounce back more sharply, and a Vshaped recovery would likely start in 2010. This reflects a faster improvement in competitiveness since high pass-through (reflecting Latvia’s openness to trade and liberalized movement of labor within the European Union) would be dampened by the negative output gap. Enhanced competitiveness would also reduce the current account deficit more quickly. This would come mainly from import compression, with a relatively slow response of Latvia’s underdeveloped export sector, especially as the external environment is not as supportive as in previous devaluation-induced recoveries as Argentina, Russia or East Asia.br /br /However, balance-sheet effects would cause a sharp drop in domestic demand. The net foreign currency exposure of Latvia’s private sector is around 70 percent of GDP, with the corporate sector’s foreign currency open position roughly double that of the household sector’s. A 15 percent devaluation against the euro would increase private sector net foreign currency exposure by 11 percent of GDP, two thirds in the corporate sector and one third in the household sector. Mismatches between owners of foreign currency assets and liabilities suggest that devaluation may cause substantial redistribution effects. Private consumption would fall by around 6 percentage points due to negative wealth effect as net foreign debt increases, house prices decline, debt service costs increase, and consumer confidence deteriorates. Experience of other countries suggests that a devaluation of this magnitude would lead to a 5 percentage point decline in private sector investment.br /br /Euroization with EU and ECB concurrence would also help address liquidity strains in the banking system. If Latvian banks could access ECB facilities, then those that are both solvent and hold adequate collateral could access sufficient liquidity. The increase in confidence should dampen concerns of resident depositors and also help stem non resident deposit outflows.br /br /br /br /However, this policy option would not address solvency concerns and has been ruled out by the European authorities. If combined with a large upfront devaluation, there would be an immediate deterioration in private-sector solvency, which could slow recovery. Privatesector debt restructuring would likely be necessary. Finally, the European Union strongly objects to accelerated euro adoption, as this would be inconsistent with treaty obligations of member governments, so this option is infeasible./em/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/why-latvia-needs-to-devalue-soon-a-reply-to-christoph-rosenberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting Reading-Monday</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/interesting-reading-monday-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/interesting-reading-monday-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael E. Brisky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FULL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael brisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rescued Citigroup;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-819581243324579563.post-4872155324629440956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123298357829015689.html"span style="font-style: italic;"Iceland's Coalition Government Collapses/span/a. Let's hope this isn't the start of any trend.br /br /a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/01262009/news/nationalnews/just_plane_despicable_152033.htm"span style="font-style: italic;"Rescued Citigroup Buying $50 Million Jet/span/a. You'd think now that they're using taxpayer dollars, they'd slow down on the "anything goes" plan, but I guess not.br /br /Only a couple today...Some interesting earnings reports coming up.br /br /Have a great day!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/interesting-reading-monday-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iceland 2009: &#8220;que se vayan todos&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/iceland-2009-que-se-vayan-todos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/iceland-2009-que-se-vayan-todos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Alvarez-Rivera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain tumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esophageal cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fernando de la Rúa;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geir Haarde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Icelandic party;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independence Party;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left-Green Movement;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manuel Alvarez-Rivera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nordic Countries;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive Party;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radical Civic Union (UCR);]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Democratic Alliance;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-3227830858961914074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Manuel Alvarez-Rivera, Puerto Ricobr /br /Just two years after holding a A HREF="http://globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com/2007/05/iceland-2007-parliamentary-election.html"parliamentary election/A, voters in Iceland are likely to return to the polls next May 9 for an early general election. Normally, the poll would not need to be held until 2011, but these are anything but normal times in the Nordic island nation, whose economy has been devastated by the ongoing global financial crisis.br /br /With all of Iceland's three major banks under receivership since October; the national currency (the krona) having lost over half its value and the stock market over 90 percent of its value; inflation and unemployment on the rise; and the GDP expected to contract by ten percent this year, public discontent over the perceived mismanagement of the economy by the coalition government of Iceland's two major parties - the conservative Independence Party and the left-of-center Social Democratic Alliance - has fueled mounting protests, first on a weekly basis and more recently on a daily basis.br /br /The protests, which have drawn crowds of up to six thousand - a respectable figure for a country with a population of just over 300,000 - had been peaceful until last week, when they suddenly turned violent. In response, Prime Minister Geir Haarde announced he would call an early election for May 9; he also indicated that he would step down due to health reasons, having been diagnosed with esophageal cancer. Prime Minister Haarde initially let it know he intended to stay in office until the early election was held, but protests continued to take place, demanding the government's immediate resignation. Minister of Business Affairs Björgvin G. Sigurðsson subsequently announced he would resign from office immediately, and Haarde's grand coalition government came apart shortly thereafter.br /br /In many ways, the events currently taking place in Iceland are reminiscent of developments in Argentina during that country's economic meltdown in late 2001, in which increasingly intense, violent protests forced the ouster of then-president Fernando de la Rúa under the rallying cry of "¡Que se vayan todos!," or "Away with them all!" - "them" being the politicians. To be certain, voters in Argentina didn't get rid of all the incumbent elected officials, but the financial crisis of 2001-02 crushed de la Rúa's Radical Civic Union (UCR), which until then had been one of the country's major political parties, and obliterated the Radicals' allies as well. Likewise, Iceland's ruling parties may be in for a major setback in the upcoming election: opinion polls indicate that the Independence Party - which has dominated Icelandic party politics since the country severed its union with Denmark in 1944 - may lose its pre-eminent status, while support for the Alliance has fluctuated wildly, with more recent polls suggesting the party is likely to lose considerable ground as well.br /br /The two parties that currently stand out to gain the most are the opposition Left-Green Movement - which stands to the left of the Alliance and appears set to become the largest party in the upcoming election - and the agrarian, middle-of-the road Progressive Party. The Left-Green Movement has never been in power, while the Progressives has held office frequently, most recently from 1995 to 2007 as the Independence Party's coalition partner. Meanwhile, Iceland's grass-root movements may also take part in the upcoming election, and they could find fertile ground for their agenda: according to one opinion poll, eight percent of voters would support parties other than the ones that ran in the preceding election.br /br /At any rate, no single party is likely to gain an overall parliamentary majority under Iceland's proportional representation system (reviewed in A HREF="http://electionresources.org/is/"Elections to the Icelandic Althing/A), and the election winner will have to find coalition partners in order to form a government. That said, it remains too early to tell what kind of government may emerge from the election, all the more so because unlike in most of the other Nordic countries, right-left coalitions such as the outgoing Independence Party-Alliance administration are a fairly common occurrence in Iceland.br /br /BUpdate/Bbr /br /Iceland President Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson has asked Social Democratic Alliance leader (and outgoing Minister for Foreign Affairs) Ingibjörg Sólrún Gísladóttir to form a minority coalition government with the Left-Green Movement, which would also be supported by the Progressive Party. However, Gísladóttir, who underwent a brain tumor operation last year, is expected to appoint Minister of Social Affairs Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir as interim prime minister. If confirmed, Sigurðardóttir - who remains highly popular - would become Iceland's first ever female premier and the world's first openly gay head of government.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/iceland-2009-que-se-vayan-todos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And Then There’s This…Thursday, January 22nd, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6thursday-january-22nd-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6thursday-january-22nd-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ambrose Evans-Pritchard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Far East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filed& The Bank of Japan;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe And Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newcrest Mining;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Presses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reykjavik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLV;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=12141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pGold started off early morning Far East trading on Wednesday as it usually does lately#8230;going into a slow decline. And, as usual, at 3:00 a.m#8230;shortly before the London open#8230;the price began to rise, this time sharply. But it was all for naught once again, as someone was there to sell gold hard the moment that the London a.m. fix was in. The decline lasted for the rest of the London session#8230;through the Comex open#8230;and only reversed at the close of London trading at 4:00 p.m#8230;.11:00 a.m. New York time. However, this attempted rally was not allowed to amount to much, but gold did close the Globex session about eight dollars above its lows./p


tr
a href="javascript:openKKCImage('1232626120-gold15.gif',635,405);"/a
/tr
tr
a style="text-decoration: none;" href="javascript:openKKCImage('1232626120-gold15.gif',635,405);"emclick to enlarge/em/a
/tr


pSilver was far more volatile. The#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6thursday-january-22nd-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Obama Nationalize U.S. Private Pensions?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/will-obama-nationalize-us-private-pensions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/will-obama-nationalize-us-private-pensions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ambrose Evans-Pritchard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank owners;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank robbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buenos Aires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cristina Kirchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franklin D Roosevelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry C. Grossman;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Telegraph;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereign International Pension Services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereign Society
 Council of Experts;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereign Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=11733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p#8220;It is possible that some brainless members of the U.S. Congress may have introduced a bill that seeks to nationalize pensions, but I hope that it will not be given serious consideration, even by the liberal Democrat majority now in control.#8221;/p
pEarlier today I received an email from a concerned member of the Sovereign  Society:/p
pem#8220;I just read a rumor that a bill is working its way through the U.S. Congress, that if becomes law, would authorize the federal government to seize all 401k#8217;s and IRA assets. These assets would then be placed in a federally administered plan to provide #8216;equal and adequate protection#8217; of assets for all retirees. This sounds like what recently occurred in Argentina. Have you heard anything about#8230;/em/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/will-obama-nationalize-us-private-pensions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The US Dollar and Gold in relationship to the Hui and currencies</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/the-us-dollar-and-gold-in-relationship-to-the-hui-and-currencies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/the-us-dollar-and-gold-in-relationship-to-the-hui-and-currencies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Stanczyk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gold Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Stanczyk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central/reserve bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comatose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duncan Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oecd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zimbabwe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapidtrends.com/blog/2009/01/16/the-us-dollar-and-gold-in-relationship-to-the-hui-and-currencies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Dollar and Gold in relationship to the Hui and currencies
By Duncan Cameron
Huge debate rages over the question as the old pop song goes “I cant live if living is without you” for China and its surplus dollars as to whether it will be invested into the US verses the US is a dog [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/the-us-dollar-and-gold-in-relationship-to-the-hui-and-currencies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Year Rally, Obama’s Plan, Shorting in 2009, The Second Wave of the Housing Bust, and More!</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/new-year-rally-obama%e2%80%99s-plan-shorting-in-2009-the-second-wave-of-the-housing-bust-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/new-year-rally-obama%e2%80%99s-plan-shorting-in-2009-the-second-wave-of-the-housing-bust-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apparent solution;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Goade;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Amoss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EverBank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heath Ledger;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I.O.U.S.A.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute For Supply Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Bankers Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick ;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate bust;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richebacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Parenteau;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tangible capital equipment;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dark Knight;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Miami Herald;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troublesome commercial real estate ripples;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Shortz;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordplay;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zimbabwe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=10942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pMarkets kick off 2009 with sizable rally… what’s behind the best New Year’s rally since 2003#8230;  Obama bounce back in effect… Rob Parenteau on whether his $1 trillion plan will actually work#8230; Dan Amoss on the difference between shorting in 2008 and 2009#8230; Bullish factors for gold (and gold stocks) for 2009#8230; The second wave cometh… more troublesome commercial real estate ripples on the horizon./p
p class="BodyCopy" align="left" strongFor the first time in a long time, we can tell you today that the U.S. stock market is up year to date:/strong /p
p class="BodyCopy" align="center"
div
div/div
/div
/pp class="BodyCopy" align="left"The major indexes rang in the new year with a 3% rally on Friday — the best first day of a new year in the last six. And a sharp contrast to 2008, when#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/new-year-rally-obama%e2%80%99s-plan-shorting-in-2009-the-second-wave-of-the-housing-bust-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Grinch was right: Christmas should be banned</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/new-zealand/the-grinch-was-right-christmas-should-be-banned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/new-zealand/the-grinch-was-right-christmas-should-be-banned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 20:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Hickey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auckland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boxing day;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital equipment;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland s A;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imported machinery;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard and Poor's Ratings Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Zealand Herald;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.co.nz/blogs/showmethemoney/2008/12/28/the-grinch-was-right-christmas-should-be-banned/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well not really&#8230;
But I do think this orgy of consumption around Christmas is a pointless and painful waste of time. It simply stores up even more foreign debt that will have to be serviced and eventually repaid.
We simply can&#8217;t afford to keep spending the way we have. The charts below show why. We need to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/new-zealand/the-grinch-was-right-christmas-should-be-banned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why The IMF&#8217;s Decision To Agree A Latvian Bailout Programme Without Devaluation Is A Mistake</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/why-the-imfs-decision-to-agree-a-lavian-bailout-programme-without-devaluation-is-a-mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/why-the-imfs-decision-to-agree-a-lavian-bailout-programme-without-devaluation-is-a-mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontier Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Aslund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltic states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bailout programmes;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christoph Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convulsions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominique  Strauss-Kahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end-product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Gill;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF's Executive Board;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF's;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bank for Reconstruction and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LVL;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nordic Countries;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parex Bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peterson Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swedbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swedish Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Moscow Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2008/pr08310.htm;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-3667907980547995952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: Barceloanbr /br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU6o6eW308I/AAAAAAAAL1c/iui4bNJT5p0/s1600-h/latvia+GDP.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282345135487046594" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 201px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU6o6eW308I/AAAAAAAAL1c/iui4bNJT5p0/s320/latvia+GDP.png" border="0" //abr /The IMF finally a href="http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2008/pr08332.htm"announced it's Latvia "bailout" plan on Friday/a. The plan involves lending about €1.7 billion ($2.4 billion) to Latvia to stabilise the currency and financial support while the government implements its economic adjustment plan. The loan, which will be in the form of a 27-month stand-by arrangement, is still subject to final approval by the IMF's Executive Board but is likely to be discussed before the end of this year under the Fund's fast-track emergency financing procedures, and it is not anticipated that there will be any last minute hitches (although I do imagine some eyebrow raising over the decision to support the continuation of the Lat peg). The Latvian government admits that some of the IMF economists involved in the negotiations advocated a devaluation of the lat as a way of ammeliorating the intense economic pain involved in the now inevitable economic adjustment. But the government in Riga stuck to its guns (supported by the Nordic banks who evidently had a lot to lose in the event of devaluation), arguing that the peg was a major credibility issue, and the cornerstone of their plan to adopt the euro in 2012.br /br /blockquote"It (the programme) is centered on the authorities' objective of maintaining the current exchange rate peg, recognizing that this calls for extraordinarily strong domestic policies, with the support of a broad political and social consensus," said IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn./blockquoteIn return for the loan the IMF have agreed a "strong package of policy measures" with the Latvian government and these will involve sharp cuts in public sector salaries, and a tight control on Latvian fiscal policy. The IMF have insisted on a substantial tightening of fiscal policy: the government is aiming for a headline fiscal deficit of less that 5 percent of GDP in 2009 (compared with a anticipated deficit of 12 percent of GDP in the absence of new measures) - to be reduced to 3% in 2010 (thus the Latvian economy will face not only tight effective monetary policy in 2010 - via the peg - but also a less accommodating fiscal environment, frankly it is hard to see where the stimulus to economic activity is going to come from here) . Structural reforms and wage reductions will also be implemented, led by the public sector, and VAT will be increased, all with the longer term objective of further strengthening Latvian competitiveness and facilitating the external adjustment. The problem is really how the Latvian population are going to eke it out in the shorter term.br /br /br /blockquote"These strong policies justify the exceptional level of access to Fund resources—equivalent to around 1,200 percent of Latvia's quota in the IMF—and deserve the support of the international community," Strauss-Kahn said./blockquoteThe loan from the IMF will be supplemented by financing from the European Union, the World Bank and several Nordic countries. The EU will provide a loan of €3.1 billion ($4.3 billion), the World Bank €400 million ($557.6 million), and several bilateral creditors [including Denmark, Estonia, Norway, and Sweden] will contribute as well, for a total package of €7.5 billion ($10.5 billion).br /br /The stabilization program forecasts that the economy will contract 5 percent next year, the Finance Ministry said in a statement yesterday. Revenue is expected to fall by 912 million lati ($1.7 billion) next year and spending will be reduced by 420 million lati.br /br /Strangely the IMF statement was not very explicit  the key topic - the currency peg - in the sense that it was a little short on argumentation as to why it considered - despite its well known waryness about such approaches, and having got its fingers very badly burnt in Argentian in 2000 - that it would be best to continue this arrangement in the Latvian case, despite the Fund's strong emphasis on the need to current the large external balances which exist (see Current Account deficit in the chart below).br /br /br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU4z_0gGpBI/AAAAAAAAL0s/tInIZD5_Vyw/s1600-h/latvia+CA+deficit.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282216584470242322" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 206px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU4z_0gGpBI/AAAAAAAAL0s/tInIZD5_Vyw/s320/latvia+CA+deficit.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /All we really know about the background to this decision is contained in the statement the IMF posted a href="http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2008/pr08310.htm"on its website on December 7/a:br /br /blockquoteMr. Christoph Rosenberg, International Monetary Fund (IMF) Mission Chief, issued the following statement today in Riga :br /br /"Following the IMF's statement on Latvia on November 21, 2008, good progress has been made towards a possible Fund-supported program for the country.In cooperation with the European Commission, some individual European governments, and regional and other multilateral institutions, we are working with the authorities on the design of stronga program that maintains Latvia's current exchange rate parity and band/strong. This will require agreement on strongexceptionally strong domestic adjustment policies/strong and sizeable external financing, as well as broad political consensus in Latvia In this context we welcome the commitment made today by the Latvian authorities. All participants are working to bring these program discussions to a rapid conclusion."/blockquotebr /pSo there seems to have been a trade-off here, between the IMF agreeing (reluctantly I think, but this is pure conjecture since there is little real evidence either way) to accept the peg, and the Latvian government agreeing to exceptionally strong adjustment policies. But the question is: was this agreement a good one, and will the bailout work as planned? I think not, and below I will present my argumentation. But before I do, I think it important to point out that the kind of internal deflation process the Latvian government has just accepted is normally very difficult to implement, which is why economists tend to favour the devaluation approach. /pJust how large the competitiveness issue is in Latvia's case can be guaged by looking at one common measure of competitiveness, what is known as the country's real effective exchange rate. The REER (or Relative price and cost indicators) aim to assess a country's price or cost competitiveness relative to its principal competitors in international markets. Changes in cost and price competitiveness depend not only on exchange rate movements but also on cost and price trends. The specific REER prepared by Eurostat for its Sustainable Development Indicators is deflated by nominal unit labour costs (total economy) against a panel of 36 countries (= EU27 + 9 other industrial countries: Australia, Canada, United States, Japan, Norway, New Zealand, Mexico, Switzerland, and Turkey). Double export weights are used to calculate the REERs, reflecting not only competition in the home markets of the various competitors, but also competition in export markets elsewhere. A rise in the index means a loss of competitiveness, and as we can see, Latvia has suffered a huge loss of competitiveness since 2005. There is a lot of "correcting" to do here.br /br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU69syQCl4I/AAAAAAAAL1s/99lB9qt3TSw/s1600-h/latvia+reer.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282367990053115778" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 180px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU69syQCl4I/AAAAAAAAL1s/99lB9qt3TSw/s320/latvia+reer.png" border="0" //abr /The problems of loss of external competitiveness Latvia faces are not new, nor are they unique. Russia may be a lot larger than Latvia, and Russia may also have oil, but Russia's internal industrial core has become uncompetitive, and there is really only one sensible way of attacking this problem, and that is through devaluation, as Standard amp; Poor's Director of European Sovereign Ratings argues in the extract I cite below. One of the unfortunate side effects of the fact that currency policy has become a href="http://latviaeconomy.blogspot.com/2008/11/estonias-recession-deepens-as-latvian.html"almost a matter of national strategic importance/a in Latvia has been that the necessary open-minded discussion of the pros and cons of the situation has not been possible.br /blockquoteAccompanied by generous government spending, the credit boom also fueled inflation, which weighed on the competitiveness of Russia's noncommodity sector. As wage growth averaged nearly 30 percent over the last two years and the ruble-denominated cost of production rose, domestic manufacturers found it very difficult to compete with cheap high-quality imports. As a consequence, entrepreneurs logically avoided manufacturing and, instead, invested in much more profitable and more import-intensive sectors, such as banking, retail and construction.br /br /The resulting structural imbalances were well camouflaged by the extraordinary growth in energy and other commodity prices. For six straight years, the earnings from Russian oil and commodity exports on world markets have increased much faster than the cost of imports, offsetting the less flattering volume effects. From 2003 through this year, the cumulative difference between export and import price inflation in Russia was a fairly remarkable 74 percent. This put upward pressure on the ruble, encouraging borrowers to take loans in dollars or euros at negative real interest rates, under the assumption that the ruble would appreciate indefinitely. But it also provided an important source of financing.br /Frank Gill, director of European sovereign ratings at Standard amp; Poor's in London, a href="http://www.moscowtimes.ru/article/1016/42/373149.htm"writing in the Moscow Times/a/blockquotebr /pSo the Latvian competitiveness problem has become evident to everyone, and perhaps the best indication of the severity of the problem is the way that people almost laugh at the suggestion that Latvia must now live from exports (exports, what exports?, they say). However it is clear, and especially given the force of the agreed internal adjustment, that domestic demand is now dead as far forward as the eye can see as an effective driver of GDP growth, and, as can be seen in the chart below, exports are going to have a hard time of it, even after growth in other European countries picks up in 2010 (or whenever).br /br //pa href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU5BpP98ksI/AAAAAAAAL08/SRF5S_XsjbA/s1600-h/latvia+imports+exports.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282231589868966594" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 209px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU5BpP98ksI/AAAAAAAAL08/SRF5S_XsjbA/s320/latvia+imports+exports.png" border="0" //abr /The competitiveness problem can be seen quite clearly in the above chart, as Latvian wage rises became detached from productivity improvements in the second half of 2005 and the rate of increase in exports shrank rapidly, while imports began to enter at a much faster rate. This process eventually itself in the first half of 2007, with import growth at first increasing rapidly, only to subsequently decline, giving in the process some positive increment to GDP from the net trade effect - as exports once more began to accelerate (creative destruction impact) even while imports fell through the floor. However as the external trade environment has darkened, even this expansion in exports has petered out, and inflation adjusted exports are currently hardly growing, and may even turn negative in the coming quarters. 2009 promises in any event to be a very hard year, but without a truly massive correction in relative prices there will be no recovery in 2010 either, and probably not in 2011. Remember, wages are now about to start falling, unemployment is about to start rising, and government expenditure is about to get pruned, so the only possible area for growth is external trade, and any inbound FDI that can be attracted to build productive capacity for exports. On top of which the correction in the current account deficit means that Latvians collectively - government, companies and households - are going to have to start saving, and a rise in net aggregate savings is basically tantamount to a brake on internal demand. So whichever way you look at it, exports are now the name of the game.br /br /br /strongWhy Keep The Peg?/strongbr /br /Given all the problems that having the peg are likely to create, what then are the arguments for maintaining it? Well frankly, such arguments are hard to find at this point, in the sense that there are relatively few people, at least in the English language, who are willing to stick their neck out and try to justify what, in my humble opinion, is virtually the unjustifiable, and the implicit consensus among thinking economists would seem to be that this is a bad idea. The decision does, however, have its advocates, and Anders Aslund of the Peterson Institute has been bold enough to have a try, so, in the interests of balance and  try and get some purchase on what the arguments might be, I am reproducing his argument in its entirety.br /blockquotea href="http://www.petersoninstitute.org/realtime/?p=311"Why Latvia Should Not Devalue/abr /by Anders Aslund December 9th, 2008br /br /Latvia has a severe financial crisis, the preconditions for which have long been evident. A fixed exchange rate to the euro led to an excessive speculative influx of capital, boosting Latvia’s private foreign debt to 100 percent of GDP. Inflation soared to 16 percent, and the current account this year to 15 percent of GDP. Latvia’s budget has traditionally been almost in balance.br /br /For most countries, devaluation would appear inevitable, and some argue that Latvia has to devalue its currency, the lat. But Latvia’s circumstances are peculiar, making the standard cure not only inappropriate but harmful. A severe wage and social expenditure freeze would be a better prescription, along the lines of a preliminary agreement on macroeconomic stabilization reached on December 8 among the Latvian government, the European Commission, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the Swedish government.br /br /Now the questions are how much financing Latvia needs, who will give it, and on what conditions? The key outstanding issue has been whether Latvia should devalue or not. But given that Latvia—and Estonia—are experiencing high inflation with close to balanced budgets, devaluation is neither necessary nor desirable. A freeze of wages and social transfers would be preferable for both economic and political reasons.br /br /First of all, thanks to Latvia’s limited GDP, $27 billion in 2007, sufficient international financing can be mobilized. The combination of IMF, EU, and Nordic funding should be sufficient.br /br /Second, devaluation is likely to aggravate inflation and it could start a snowball effect of higher inflation and repeated devaluations. A devaluation would not be less than 20 percent and it would cause greater social and economic disruption.br /br /Third, the great number of mortgages held in euros would force a massive blow-up of bad debt and mortgage defaults, which in turn would seriously harm the population, the housing sector, and the banking sector and thus the economy as a whole. Such a banking crisis is not necessary. One of the three big banks, Parex Bank, has already gone under, but the other two, the Swedish banks Swedbank and SEB, are strong enough to hold, if no devaluation occurs.br /br /Fourth, Latvia’s main macroeconomic problem is inflation. Devaluation would initially aggravate inflation, while a wage and social expenditure freeze would sharply reduce inflation. High inflation has led to the excessive current account deficit. Latvia does not suffer from any structural terms of trade shockbr /br /Fifth, a freeze on wages and public expenditures would strengthen the budget, while devaluation is likely to lead to severe budget strains.br /br /Sixth, the Latvian population seems politically committed to the fixed exchange rate, and it seems prepared to take a freeze of incomes and public expenditures, and if necessary even cuts. Therefore, devaluation could lead to undesirable and unwarranted political convulsions.br /br /Finally, devaluation in Latvia would inevitably drag down Estonia as well, and all the effects would be doubled, while Estonia might hold its own without Latvian devaluation. Lithuania, which does not really have any serious financial problems, could also be harmed. I would have recommended that the Baltics abandon their fixed exchange rates a few years ago, but this is the wrong time to do so.br /br /The argument I am making applies only to very small economies with basically sound economic policies. Russia and Ukraine are in a very different situation. Both suffer from major structural changes in terms of trade because of slumping commodity prices, and they should let their exchange rates float downward with their terms of trade./blockquotebr /br /pbr /The main arguments in favour of the peg would thus seem to be as follows:/pbr /br /p1/ strongLatvia's situation is exceptional/strong (is that also true of Bulgaria, Estonia and Lithuania?). It is hard to know what to make of this. Certainly the comparison with Ukraine and Russia does not seem appropriate, since these are ultimately competitor countries as far as manufacturing industry goes, and they are devaluing not because of their raw material exports (agriculture and energy) are too high, but because the price of the products from their manufacturing industries are too high due to all the earlier internal inflation, and the attempts to maintain the currency value via the controlled "corridor".br /br /2/ strongA severe wage and social expenditure freeze would be a better prescription than devaluation/strong. Well they would be a good prescription, but they simply are not possible, since simply strongfreezing/strong things where we are won't work, the imbalances are too large, so we are talking about strongsharp reductions/strong in wages and public spending (as nominal GDP goes sharply down, then even a 5% fiscal deficit will mean spending has to contract - by 420 million lati according to the budget forecast - although the IMF has agreed to a policy of protecting social expenditure as much as possible)./pbr /br /p3/ strongThen there is the forex mortgage situation/strong. This I agree is a major problem, as devaluation implies default, and an oncost for Sacndinavian banks. But if we are sending the entire Latvian population through all this simply to attempt to avoid defaults on mortgages we are making a mistake, since obviously the sharp rise in unemployment we can expect and the sharp fall in wages can have a similar impact. I mean, one way or another the REER (see above) is going back to the 2005 level, so the mortgages will be just as unaffordable, and in my view the best solution to this would be for the Scandinavian (and Italian - Unicredit) banks to take a haircut, and receive compensation via their domestic bank bailout programmes. This would be a much more equitable sharing of the costs of the forex lending programme having gone wrong. To take another example, Spain is not devaluing from the euro, yet a hefty round of mortgage defaults (and builder bankruptcies) is now expected. So it is really a case of default through one door, or default through the other one. Which way would you like to go, sir?/pbr /br /p4/. strongThat devaluation would provoke inflation/strong. Well this is just the point, devaluation would only provoke strongsignificant/strong inflation IF Latvia still didn't have an independent monetary policy (to restrain domestic demand), but since part of the reason for devaluation is precisely to recover control over monetary policy again, this argument seems to me not to be completely valid, and it seems to be forgetting the other problem, deflation, which is much more likely to become Latvia's real problem over the next two or three years. Trying to run some form of a href="http://japanjapan.blogspot.com/2008/12/did-or-didnt-japan-just-re-introduce.html"Quantitative Easing/a (which is the new "in" term for how best to handle monetary policy in the midst of a liquidity trap, which may well be where Latvia and several other CEE economies are now headed) without independent monetary policy is quite frankly, completely impossible. If we look at the chart for the producer price index I reproduce below, we will see that the PPI (which is normally regarded as an indicator of coming inflation) is no longer climbing, and seems set to start to come down., and this could easily be an early warning signal for forthcoming deflation.br /br //ppa href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU47qabRIjI/AAAAAAAAL00/2WO8bpJWCB4/s1600-h/latvia+PPI.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282225012786405938" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 207px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU47qabRIjI/AAAAAAAAL00/2WO8bpJWCB4/s320/latvia+PPI.png" border="0" //a/pp 5/. strongThe Latvian population seems politically committed to the fixed exchange rate/strong, and appears prepared to take a freeze of incomes and public expenditures. This may well be true, and is an impression I get when I look at some of the comments on my blog. Many Latvians (and citizens of other Baltic states) have accepted the peg as some indication of "post-independence" indication of national "seriousness", and that any stepping-back from it would be seen as some kind of defeat. I understand this view, but I think it is a mistake, since sometimes it is better to accept defeat in order to live to fight again another day. I think Latvian politicians are to some extent reacting to this kind of pressure, to some extent thinking about their own invested social capital, and to some extent under pressure from Nordic banks. In any event all three of these seem to have more influence than the rational arguments about the advisability of the peg. There is no doubt in my mind that the coming recession will be longer and deeper if the peg is maintained. Indeed I am almost certain that the attempt to sustain it will fail (and that we will see some kind of rerun of Argentina 2000 - in all three Baltic countries and Bulgaria) and really the sooner the population become aware of this the better. Basically what we witnessed in Argentia in 2000 was basically a process of growing battle fatigue and war weariness, as the population were asked to make one sacrifice after another in support of a policy which couldn't work, and only lasted as long as it could. The end product is that when the peg finally breaks the local population will be severely disillusioned, and the politicians will totally lack credibility, which is a sure recipe for chaos, as we saw in Argentina in 2001. /ppIndeed, if anything the position is arguably worse in Latvia at the present time, since the optimum conditions for a free and open debate about the alternatives aren't exactly in place at the moment it seems very hard to know what the population at large would decide if they had complete access to all the arguments.br /br /br /6/. Finally, strongdevaluation in Latvia would inevitably drag down Estonia as well/strong. This is undoubtedly a consideration in the mind of the IMF (and Lithuania, and Bulgaria) but really all of this will have to be faced by all four countries sooner or later, especially since the only way out of their recession will be, as I am saying, through exports, and most of the other competitor countries (look even what is happening to the Polish zloty and the Czech Koruna as I write) will see the partities of their respective currencies well down on the euro as we enter the recovery.br /br /strongWhere Is Growth Now Going To Come From?br //strongbr /Basically the key argument for devaluation is that it is easier to manage an economy with a low level of inflation (please note I am saying low, very low, certainly below 2%, ask Ben Bernanke or the Japanese is you don't believe me) than it is to manage an economy which is in deflation freefall. The big danger in Latvia is not only that there can be a real (ie price adjusted) contraction in the economy of 5% in 2009 (or more, the economy is down 4.9% year on year in Q3 2008, and things are certainly going to get worse), but that this contraction may be accompanied by price deflation (ie actually falling wages and prices) which means nominal (current price) GDP would decrease by the size of the strongreal/strong contraction plus the fall in prices. Thus we could see a very large drop in nominal GDP in 2009 and 2010. If realised this would be a very difficult situation to handle, and I doubt the people currently taking policy decisions in Latvia are fully aware of the implications (although the IMF economists should know better). In particular the deflationary debt dynamics would be very hard to control, and again, especially without independent monetary policy.br /br /It is important to remember that these loans which have been agreed to are simply that, loans, to guaranteee the external financial stability of the country during the forthcoming correction, but they do not, in and of themselves solve any of the real economy problems. And they will need to be repaid if they are used, and will nominal Latvian GDP heading down, the cost of repaying them effectively goes up in terms of real Lat earnings. This is what debt deflation means. /pblockquoteThe International Monetary Fund on Friday said it now expects a net income ofbr /about $11 million in fiscal year 2009, and not a shortfall of $294 million asbr /previously forecast, as more countries turn to it for rescue loans in abr /deepening financial crisis. "The improved income outlook reflects new lendingbr /activity that is estimated to generate additional fund income of about $247br /million, assuming all disbursements under the recently approved arrangements arebr /made as scheduled," the IMF said. Since early November, the IMF has approvedbr /rescue packages for Hungary, Iceland, Ukraine and Latvia as the global crisisbr /spreads to more emerging economies.br //blockquotepI am citing a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSN1934402920081219"the above Reuters report/a, not as a criticism of the IMF - they are simply doing their job as best they can, and under very difficult circumstances - but to remind people that the IMF is effectively a bank, and these are loans, and interest is paid, and there are no "freebees" here, and definitely no "free lunches" - not even in the newly established Latvian soup kitchens./ppSo we should ask ourselves where growth is going to come from - the growth that will now be needed to repay the capital and interest on these loans. Certainly not from household consumption if we look at the chart below, or from government consumption given the restraint on public spending. The private consumption position can only deteriorate as wages fall and unemployment rises./ppa href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU5JfIXN4CI/AAAAAAAAL1E/-MQMewMxcDc/s1600-h/latvia+private+consumption.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282240212121804834" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 208px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU5JfIXN4CI/AAAAAAAAL1E/-MQMewMxcDc/s320/latvia+private+consumption.png" border="0" //abr /Not from manufacturing industry in the short term (until prices correct, and the external recovery starts), and again look at the chart./ppbr /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU5KR4noxWI/AAAAAAAAL1M/6bedIE-7kpQ/s1600-h/latvia+manufacturing+output.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282241084069037410" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 206px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU5KR4noxWI/AAAAAAAAL1M/6bedIE-7kpQ/s320/latvia+manufacturing+output.png" border="0" //a And finally don't expect an investment driven recovery (again see chart) until the demand for Latvian exports picks up, and it becomes attractive to start expansing capacity.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU5LVCnn3FI/AAAAAAAAL1U/HqhlEoKKGWc/s1600-h/latvia+fixed+capital.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282242237804567634" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 206px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU5LVCnn3FI/AAAAAAAAL1U/HqhlEoKKGWc/s320/latvia+fixed+capital.png" border="0" //abr /Basically I feel the biggest condemnation which can be made of the package which has been announced is that it doesn't seem to contain one single policy for stimulating the economy, and stimulation and a return to growth is what Latvia badly needs by now./ppAnd the worst case scenario outcome of the way all this is being handled (and the issue that actually concerns me the most) is the possibility that young people decide to start migrating out of the country again, in order seek a new future and to start sending money home to help their families confront the difficult circumstances. Since Latvia's population is already declining this would be the cruelest cut of all, and one would have to then ask just what kind of future really awaits this unfortunate country?br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU6x87sGovI/AAAAAAAAL1k/EnvJlub7-Io/s1600-h/latvia+population.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282355073325114098" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 174px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU6x87sGovI/AAAAAAAAL1k/EnvJlub7-Io/s320/latvia+population.png" border="0" //a/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/why-the-imfs-decision-to-agree-a-lavian-bailout-programme-without-devaluation-is-a-mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Randoms</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/friday-randoms-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/friday-randoms-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Nusbaum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absolute products;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geothermal energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reykjavik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8532070.post-4597290258282492327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2008528983_icefish17.html?syndication=rss"article about the fishing industry/a in Iceland made its way into many newspapers yesterday. Apparently there is a boom in fishing, the Icelanders have not over-fished their waters and the weak ISK helps when they sell the fish abroad.br /br /Iceland will recover at some point although it may look different that it did. If you read anything about the ascendancy of Iceland that occurred you will invariably find a comment about Range Rovers driving through the streets of Reykjavik and having been there for a few days a couple of years ago I can tell you it is true; Range Rovers and BMWs aplenty. Or it was true anyway.br /br /While I don't know how they should do this I think they need to really push to draw in more things like data centers and certain types of manufacturing that would benefit from the geothermal energy. The cost efficiencies are obvious and the location (five hours from NYC and three hours from the European continent would seem to be ideal for many multinational businesses.br /br /While the move up in foreign currencies and gold has been pronounced and I think it is the right direction for a while it will not be a straight shot up. If you are interested in these parts of the market (they are now all easily accessed) for a longer term hold you should remember that nothing can be a one way trade but the bigger macro is that rates in the US are at zero and going to stay there for a long time. Gold at $1500 is a bigger move than I would expect but a move that ends up looking pretty good seems reasonable even if the next $50 is down.br /br /Speaking of which, sort of, the crew over at a href="http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/"Bespoke/a noticed that gold and platinum are trading at about the same level which is a rare thing. A long/short pair trade involving gold and platinum (there are several ETPs to access platinum) is popular with some folks. Someone left a question about what absolute products I use and while a pairing of gold and platinum is not in my wheelhouse that is one that does work for some folks. Anyone just starting learn about absolute strategies and who has a knack for commodities might want to do some learning about that one.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/friday-randoms-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Will Matt Hougan Ever Learn?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/when-will-matt-hougan-ever-learn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/when-will-matt-hougan-ever-learn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Wiandt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange Traded Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[little real estate runup look;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Hougan Ever;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.indexuniverse.com://4561ced09eea9bc4887cb75e5d11e13e</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--[if gte mso 9]&#62;-->
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
<!--[if gte mso 9]&#62;-->

<!--[if gte mso 10]&#62;-->

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}


<p>
I suspected Matt's flash of optimism might be brief.
</p>

<p>
Matt - you've consistently cheered us down to a lower and
lower stock market, cratering real estate prices with an almost giddy thirst
for gloom and panic. So why stop now?
</p>
<p>
I guess at least $25 a barrel oil means lower expenses for
workers.  In all seriousness, though, as
soon as I posted that blog about oil being so much more likely to go to $100
than $25, I did have doubts.  Clearly the
contango in the market feels pretty confident, and my money is still generally
on that. But I long learned that with energy prices and gold prices in
particular, all bets are off on how low (or high) they can go.
</p>
<p>
But man, it's true, you look at this economy, and there
really isn't much that is pretty about it. GM is trading at 1950 prices, pretty
much every major financial business is either out of business or under siege,
the number of newly unemployed is the highest in 35 or so years, and this
recession they're saying is already nearly certain to be the longest since the
great depression (that one is a bit hard to figure out, since they only said we
were IN a recession officially a couple weeks ago...but don't try to hard to make
sense of the government's economic statistics­­).
</p>
<p>
And heck, it's probably WORSE overseas.  Iceland is practically bankrupt with its citizens
fleeing en masse to find work (how is unemployment across Scandanavia still
generally under 2% BTW? I thought that was not economically possible). The UK
feels like panic in the streets with the government doing a very good job of
convincing the public there that they have absolutely no idea what they're
doing - and they've cut rates to the lowest in England since 1807 or somesuch.
The ECB has completely slashed rates as well after a long period of
denial.  Um, looks like trouble.
</p>
<p>
So what does all of this mean?  Well, it means for one thing, that if you are
in your prime earning years and can stay afloat and stay employed, this is a
once in a lifetime opportunity to ride a weath creation train that will
ultimately make that last little real estate runup look like a kiddy park
horsey ride (though you may not be levered up in the same way).  Who knows when that train will get started,
but it WILL sometime.  I guess that's
what you have to see, to feel confident of...it's the silver lining in what is
generally (as one member of the U.S. Congress so eloquently put it) one giant
crap sandwich. 
</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/when-will-matt-hougan-ever-learn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romania&#8217;s Economy Heads Off Quietly, And With No Fanfares, Into It&#8217;s Deepest  Crisis in a Decade</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/romanias-economy-heads-off-quietly-and-with-no-fanfares-into-its-deepest-crisis-in-a-decade-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/romanias-economy-heads-off-quietly-and-with-no-fanfares-into-its-deepest-crisis-in-a-decade-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 10:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Alvarez-Rivera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abn Amro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregate bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alin Tapalaga;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baia Mare;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltic states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banca Transilvania;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bancpost;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Romania;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCR;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRD Groupe Société Générale;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bucharest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calin Popescu-Tariceanu;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEC;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank policy rate;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank year end target;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eastern europe economy watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy price shocks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exempt new car sales;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EximBank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fact central bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fitch Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign-owned banking system remains;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Futureal Group;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabor Futo;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Plaza;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kazakhstan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lower social insurance payments;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetary systems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mugur Isarescu;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Bank of Romania;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overnight Interbank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[past year using bank loans;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porsche Inter Auto;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porsche Romania;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raiffeisen Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate index;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate transactions;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail division;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail sales strongfell/strong;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romanian Association of Automobile Producers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romanian government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romanian Labour Ministry;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romanian Parliament;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RON;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short term retail sales data;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-owned bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systemic bank bailouts;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Registry Office;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UniCredit Tiriac Bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Varujan Vosganian;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1443720106009957151.post-3756901641817330031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Controversy surrounding the Romanian economy is nothing new, nor, as a href="http://globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com/2008/11/romania-votes-under-new-electoral.html"Manuel points out in his post on the recent election/a, are Romanian politics strangers to tumult. Nonetheless the intensity of controversy has grown considerably of late, with a wide variety of assessments being offered concerning the likely impact of the intensifying international credit crisis on the short to medium term outlook for the Romanian economy. National Bank of Romania (NBR) governor, Mugur Isarescu, has been consistently arguing that the country should be able to avoid an excessively "hard landing"as the bank attempts to cool its evidently overheated economy and engages of fire-extinguising activities in the banking sector trying to control the impact of set of adverse external circumstances that are largely beyond its control. But most of these comments (or at least the more convincing ones) preceded the meltdown in the international financial markets which followed the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, the fallout from which has surely had a strong negative impact on Romania's economy and greatly complicated the task of conducting macroeconomic policy which faces the new government to be be formed following last weekends elections.br /br /The other complicating factor has been the "own goal" scored recently by the Romanian political process, with one politician after another proposing fiscal deficit raising policies, at just a time when the international financial markets have become extremely sensitive to just this development in countries which are, due to their large current account deficits, mainly dependent on external borrowing to finance their lending needs. The accommodative fiscal policy being run by the Romanian government has also been extremely ill advised at a time when the central bank was busy trying to cool overheating by applying a restrictive monetary policy. For policy to be coherent, the two main levers need to be operated in tandem, and not at cross purposes.br /br /However, despite all odds, Romania has been hanging on in there, and GDP remained strong in the third quarter, a situation which has lead some commentators to use the term "gravity defiers" to describe those East European economies, like Romania and Bulgaria, that have so far avoided having a sharp adjustment, despite having evidently unsound macroeconomic fundamentals, and in particular unsustainably large external deficits.br /br /Not everyone has been convinced by the positive posture being assumed from within Romania, however, and Fitch Ratings agency had already downgraded Romania's outlook (together with that of the Baltic states and Bulgaria) from stable to negative by August pointing out in the process that the economy was extremely vulnerable to external financial pressure. This association of Romania with the Baltics is not incidental, since the Baltic economies were until only very recently - as Romania is now - the fastest growing in the European Union (with rapid credit expansion and large current-account deficit, sound familiar) but have subsequently experienced a very sharp growth slowdown following a sharp tightening in domestic credit demand and a dropping-off of external demand after high internal inflation fuelled by very large annual wage rises destroyed competitiveness. Indeed both Latvia and Estonia are now in deep recession, and have moved in a matter of months from being the EU's fastest growing to being the EU's most rapidly contracting economies. This is precisely what the expression "boom-bust" really means.br /br /The million dollar question at this point is whether or not the Romanian economy is destined to follow along the same path. In the analysis that follows I will basically be arguing that this is exactly where the Romanian economy is now headed. Some evidence to back the view can be seen in the latest reading on the EU economic confidence indicator (see below) which after months of trending slowly and steadily downwards suddenly lurched sharply south in October and November. Another detail which we would do well to bear in mind is that after many months of consecutive rises, seasonally adjusted retail sales strongfell/strong in Romania (by 2.1%) in October over September. Indeed a growing quantity of anecdotal evidence now suggests that something important changed in Romania in October, even if we may yet need to wait several months to see the in the cold clear light of day the actual consequences of what happened. Another signal we have is that all is not exactly well, is that the number of newly-established companies increased only 0.7 percent in the year up to mid-November when compared with the same period last year, while bankruptcies soared according to the latest data from the Trade Registry Office (ONRC) - and in fact October was the month with most cases of insolvency, up a whopping 79 percent over October last year. In addition Romania's banks experienced a sharp liquidity crisis in mid October (see more below) and needed to borrow a total 49 billion lei (13 billion euros) in October from the central bank (using its lombard credit facility). This is 28 times the total amount borrowed between January and September 2008, according to NBR data. Banks only borrowed 20 million lei in lombard credits in September, while the total value of the loans issued was 1.75 billion lei between January and September.br /br /br /br /br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQJVh-ssqI/AAAAAAAALm0/Gtkzhhl0YmA/s1600-h/eu+sentiment+romania.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274851329060942498" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 189px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQJVh-ssqI/AAAAAAAALm0/Gtkzhhl0YmA/s320/eu+sentiment+romania.png" border="0" //abr /br /strongEvents Take Their Course/strongbr /br /br /blockquoteA capital-inflow-driven absorption boom has underpinned rapid catch-up growth but also fuelled macroeconomic imbalances. In particular, the external current-account deficit has risen to unsustainable levels. And, since mid-2007, headline CPI inflation has surged well above the central bank’s target, in part reflecting the firstround effects of food and energy price shocks. Rapid credit growth has raised risks to financial stability, although the largely foreign-owned banking system remains wellplaced to absorb shocks. In this setting, fiscal policy has been highly procyclical and lacked medium-term orientation.br /IMF Article IV Consultation, July 2008/blockquotepbr /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQLIp9AH6I/AAAAAAAALm8/VjUj_J2Rbrs/s1600-h/romania+ca+deficit.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274853306886266786" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 194px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQLIp9AH6I/AAAAAAAALm8/VjUj_J2Rbrs/s320/romania+ca+deficit.png" border="0" //a The IMF quote above basically spells out the general understanding economists have of what has been happening in Romania. Real GDP growth has been robust,but has increasingly been running up against capacity bottlenecks. Largescale emigration, notably to Italy and Spain, and high demand for workers, especially in construction, have resulted in tight labor market conditions. As a result, real wage growth has outpaced productivity growth, with buoyant public-sector wages adding to private-sector wage pressures. With core inflation under pressure, headline inflation has surged, partly owing to the firstround effects of shocks to energy and food prices, and to some extent reflecting the 2007 drought. However the initial shock has evidently moved over into second round effects, and price setters, faced with higher unit labor and other input costs, have been struggling to maintain their markups, as also indicated by surging producer-price inflation. /ppIt is in this context that the fact that fiscal policy stance in 2007 was highly procyclical becomes a problem. The fiscal deficit increased in 2007 to 2.25 percent of GDP, up from 0.5 percent of GDP in 2006. Adjusted for the automatic effects of the booming economy on the fiscal position, the IMF estimated that the 2007 structural deficit rose to almost 4 percent of GDP. As a result, the fiscal stance was highly expansionary, adding an estimated net fiscal stimulus of 2 percent of GDP to an already overheating economy. Thus the Romanian economy was simply booming along just waiting for something unfortunate to happen, and, of course, true to form and as was to be expected, it eventually did.br /br /strongOctobers "Sudden-Stop" Credit Crunch/strongbr /br /Bank lending seems to have ground to a virtual halt in Romania in mid October (and October is the latest month for which we have statistics from the National Bank of Romania). After rising at a monthy rate of 4% (or a 50% annual rate) in September, total lending to households and non financial corporations actually strongfell/strong in October (when compared with September) by 0.6%. For an economy which has been experiencing a debt driven consumer and construction boom it is hard to overstate the significance of this single fact. We seem to have what is known as a "sudden stop" in aggregate bank lending here, and the Romanian economy may now well fall rapidly into recession, following the tried and tested path so recently pioneered by Latvia and Estonia.br /br /While RON denominated lending continued to advance slightly, the largest hit appears to be being taken - not really surprisingly - by forex loans, which fell in total by 1.5% in total month on month (-1.9% corporates, -1.2% households). Given that the RON strengthened slightly against the euro during the month the decline was probably less than it appears (since the book value in RON of forex loans falls when the Leu strengthens - and vice versa - and this revaluation is of course the great danger represented by a sudden Leu slide, since not only will the monthly payments on the mortgages shoot up, so too will the capital value of the outstanding mortgage, as anyone unfortunate enough to have taken out a loan in Japanese Yen, or CHF, surely already knows to their cost). But basically, since the currency fluctuated wildly but was actually up against the euro by 1.5% in October, we really do need to wait till we get to see what happened in November to have a clearer picture.br //ppa href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQH3w7cmaI/AAAAAAAALms/T0BiBrQqBHQ/s1600-h/romania+lending+2.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274849718166133154" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 172px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQH3w7cmaI/AAAAAAAALms/T0BiBrQqBHQ/s320/romania+lending+2.png" border="0" //abr /br /However, if we look back over the two months of September and October (where the currency fluctuations to some extent cancel each other out, but that overall the leu weakened 4.5% against the euro) then it is clear there has been a sharp slowdown in forex lending, and the effects of this slowdown will gradually be felt over the next six to nine months. Well, gradually or not so gradually, since new car sales (which obviously normally need finance) fell by nearly 30% year on year in October (to 20,478 from 29,347 a year earlier), according to the latest data from the Romanian Association of Automobile Producers amp; Importers. Basically if we look at the pattern which we can see in other economies which have been affected by the credit crunch, what started off as a slowdown in demand for cars as oil prices rose "transited" to an inability to finance purchases as oil prices fell back again. Hence the current difficulties of motor industry "majors" like Ford and General Motors.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQHQyWKvwI/AAAAAAAALmk/XjUF9PNvG2A/s1600-h/romania+household+credit.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274849048531746562" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 154px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQHQyWKvwI/AAAAAAAALmk/XjUF9PNvG2A/s320/romania+household+credit.png" border="0" //abr /br /strongFiscal Deficit Issues/strong/ppAnother area of concern has been Romania's budget deficit, which stood at 2.4% in 2007, and is expected to widen in 2008 and 2009 . A number of factors are contributing to this steady deterioration:br /br /1) the rising cost of government borrowing;br /2) forecasts of a sharp decline in GDP growth for 2009br /3) enactment of spending pledges made by candidates ahead of Nov-08 electionsbr /br /br /Romania's loose fiscal policy stance and the growing public spending commitments were among the key reasons cited by credit ratings agencies for the recent downgrades in Romanian debt to what is effectively 'junk' status. Indeed Finance Minister Varujan Vosganian recently estimated that spending increases authorised by parliament before last weeks elections could widen the budget deficit considerably beyond the EU’s 3% of GDP limit, and some estimates suggest that, on a worst case scenario, it could possibly even amount to as much as 7% of GDP in 2009. /ppIndeed it looks as if the deficit could even pass the 3% level in 2008 (the year of such a rapid expansion, there is surely no excuse for this) since the 11 month budget deficit widened to 2.9% of GDP following a sharp drop in budget revenues over the last two months according to Varujan Vosganian last week. Vosganian told a press conference that budget revenues in October and November were 1.3 billion euros below the projected level.br /br /Perhaps the highest profile decision in the context of the recent Romanian fiscal deficit "cause celebre" was the one taken on 8 October by the Romanian Parliament, when it agreed to a pay rise for teachers which was calculated to be in the region of 50%, and this against the explicit wishes of Calin Popescu Tariceanu, the prime minister, who headed the then minority liberal government. The main worry arising from the teachers’ pay increase, aside from the concerns over how it will be funded, centres on the impact it will have on the pay demands of other public-sector workers and, in turn, of private-sector workers. If such wage pressures are not resisted, then they will obviously only weaken further an already weakened Romanian competitiveness and in all probability would drive inflation back above the 10% mark in 2009. This would be the result in normal circumstances, but the Romanian economy is not in normal circumstances right now, and it is highly unlikely that the present credit crunch and the pressure from the international financial markets will leave time for this inflation spiral to run its course. Much more urgent matters are likely to make their presence felt first.br /br /Varujan Vosganian seems to be tirelessly explaining in the face of deaf ears that the proposed increase could push the budget deficit up in the direction of 7% of GDP in 2009, as no provision had been made to raise taxation, and the outgoing government issued an emergency ordinance on October 28th postponing the increase, following a warning from the IMF about the likely fiscal consequences.br /br /Defenders of the recent decisions, however, are quick to point out that Romania's accumulated public debt, at around 12% of GDP, is still extremely low. But this is to miss the force of the macroeconomic argument against running such annual deficits at time of high GDP growth. Basically, at this point, the Romanian economy has been overheating (and has not been stuck deep in recession), so the principal macro argument would be in favour of fiscal surpluses (and substantial ones, say 3% or 4% of GDP) to try and drain excess demand from the system. This is doubly the case when you look at the underlying difficulties of applying standard monetary policy (the central bank has been raising interest rates since to try and keep inflation better under control) in a context where foreign exchange denominated loans have been freely available at what effectively amount to negative interest rates. /pbr /pAlthough the government has made an effort to promote a more prudent fiscal policy, the temptation to win more voters has proved to be stronger. Consequently, the government decided to increase the benchmark index for calculating individual pensions by 20 % to RON 697.5 as of November earlier than originally planned. The benchmark index was already increased in November 2007 by 35 % and by another 7.5 % in January 2008. It will be further raised next January to complete the promised reform of the pension system aimed at bringing the average pension to 45 % of the average gross wage from the level of 35.5 % in November 2007. Doubtless we will soon here complaints about how "internation financial speculators" have brought the Romanian economy to its knees, but such voices would do a lot better looking at the degree of responsibility exercised by Romanian politicians in the face of the world's worst financial crisis in over 75 years, in a climate were concerns about procyclical fiscal deficits are known to be widespread.br /br /strongSubstantial Inflation Pressures Remain/strongbr /br /Inflation lies at the heart of the mechanism which has been steadily - via the expansionary fiscal posture - undoing the Romanian economy, and, right on cue, Romanian inflation increased again in October, hitting 7.4 percent, after dropping back to 7.3 percent in September. Consumer prices were up 1.1 percent month on month. /ppa href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STkW7t1BdzI/AAAAAAAALpk/w8k9N1lcnkQ/s1600-h/romania+inflation.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5276273653611329330" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 184px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STkW7t1BdzI/AAAAAAAALpk/w8k9N1lcnkQ/s320/romania+inflation.png" border="0" //abr /br /In the Romanian context it is impossible to relate this inflationary pressure exclusively to rising energy and food costs, doubly so since these latter have now been falling steadily since July. The Romanian economy has been running at a much faster pace than it can comfortably sustain, and nowhere has this been clearer than in the strong upward pressure on wages, with net wages growing at an annual 24.6 percent in September while unemployment continued to hover near a 16-year low. In fact annual net wages increases have averaged around 24% over the last 6 months (see chart below), while real wage increases (allowing for inflation) have averaged around 15% throughout 2008.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STkn2uOhgGI/AAAAAAAALps/wpGj4xa28sg/s1600-h/romania+wages.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5276292259516612706" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 190px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STkn2uOhgGI/AAAAAAAALps/wpGj4xa28sg/s320/romania+wages.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /Monthly unemployment has been running at around 3.9% of the labour force (or 350,000 people) according to data from the Romanian Labour Ministry, or at around 5.9% according to the EU harmonised rate published by Eurostat (the difference between these two numbers is due to the different methodologies and criteria used). In either case these are historically quite low rates for the Romanian economy, and it needs to be borne in mind that there are at least a million Romanians (or another 10% of the labour force) working abroad (largely in Spain and Italy) most of them sending monthly remittances home to their families and relatives, remittances which in their turn fuel domestic demand, demand which the economy lacks sufficient capacity to meet without putting pressure on inflation.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STk3eM6MT-I/AAAAAAAALp0/2cXqPvgbbYo/s1600-h/romania+unemployment.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5276309430442151906" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 185px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STk3eM6MT-I/AAAAAAAALp0/2cXqPvgbbYo/s320/romania+unemployment.png" border="0" //a Of course, having made the point so forcefully about how much of a problem inflation has been in the Romanian economy, I think I should point out that this problem may well be set to disappear, or at least become somewhat less important in the general picture, should the Romanian slowdown prove to be as dramtic as I fear it might. We could move very rapidly from a situation of undercapacity and overheating to one of excess capacity, and sharp cooling as domestic demand folds and exports stagnate. Naturally everything depends on what happens to the Leu, since if we see a further substantial weakening in the currency this in itself will tend to add to inflation pressures, depending on how large a fall in the currency we are talking about.br /br /br /strongMonetary Policy and the Leubr //strongbr /The Romania central bank which has been using monetary policy as best as it is able to try and fight the inflation threat, kept its key policy rate - which is the second highest in the EU after the 11% rate in Hungary - unchanged at 10.25% in October, although they did lowered reserve requirement on leu deposits (to 18% from 20%, as of November 24) in an attempt to ease the growing pressure on domestic liquidity which has been so evident since the mini financial crisis of mid October.br //ppa href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQo8JwbrVI/AAAAAAAALnE/JHIxXwtLP9s/s1600-h/romania+cb+rate.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274886077434015058" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 197px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQo8JwbrVI/AAAAAAAALnE/JHIxXwtLP9s/s320/romania+cb+rate.png" border="0" //abr /br /Further monetary tightening (following the Hungarian example) might have seemed a more prudent strategy, particularly given the current comparatively low level of the real policy rate (only 2.75% above inflation), the continuing inflation pressures, the continuing loose fiscal stance and the recent credit rating downgrade from Samp;P. There is also the credibility issue to take into account, since Romanian inflation is still running well above the central bank year end target of 3.8%. On the other hand, if we take account of the rapid deterioration in the internal economic climate since October, then exercising caution may have been more sensible than it seems at first sight. The problem is that the Romanian central bank - like its Hungarian counterpart - is now caught between the need to protect the value of the Leu (given the prior level of forex borrowing) and the need to try to offset the rapid and dramatic decline in internal demand.br /br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STRNZPqlJiI/AAAAAAAALnM/dl6ECsj0-fU/s1600-h/euro+leu+cross.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274926159654888994" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 184px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STRNZPqlJiI/AAAAAAAALnM/dl6ECsj0-fU/s320/euro+leu+cross.png" border="0" //abr /Just what kind of pressure we could see on the Leu in the coming weeks was illustrated during the days between 10 and 20 October, when the tremendous pressure on the currency (see spike in chart above) forced the Romanian cenbank to intervene directly in the foreign exchange market to defend the currency. Questions remain about the extent to which any local tightening policy can work while private indebtedness continues to be fueled by forex denominated (largely euro) loans and the NBR is sure to face increasingly difficult decisions as growth slows in the coming monthsbr /br /In fact central bank Governor Mugur Isarescu argued that the bank responded to an "attack on the leu'' which had drained lei from the market and driven overnight interbank market rates sharply higher. The Banca Nationala a Romaniei sold 40 million euros on October 10 for lei on the interbank market and the Finance Ministry sold 291 million lei of three-year bonds on October 16. Overnight Interbank Bid Rates (ROBID) soared to 19 percent on October 17 (up from 16.53 percent on October 16) as banks frantically tried to get their hands on lei. Rates have subsequently come back down again, but at the start of December they were still hovering in the 12% to 13% range, well above the 7% to 8% range of January 2008, and also well above the 10.25% targeted central bank policy rate. Basically these rates seem to have gotten completely out of alignment with central bank policy towards the end of August, and there seems to be little evidence (or likelihood) that they will be coming back into line anytime in the near future (see a href="http://www.bnro.ro/en/Info/Istoric/BB_istoric.asp"the time series for yourself here/a - also anyone looking for a quick and handy list of banks with exposure to the Romanian market, a href="http://www.ebrd.com/new/pressrel/2008/080307a.htm"the quoting banks for ROBOR/a are ABN Amro, Bancpost, Banca Transilvania, BRD Groupe Société Générale, BCR, CEC, EximBank, ING, Raiffeisen Bank and UniCredit Tiriac Bank)./ppSome analysts question whether Romania can finshy;ance its 59 billion euros in external debt without International Monetary Fund support of the kind secured by neighbours Hungary and Ukraine if such "attacks" continue to occur. The leu has now slipped 7 per cent against the euro since August, while the Romanian stockmarket is down 71% in the year to date and the leu has weakened by 21% against the US dollar over the same period.br /br /strongRomania's GDP Continues To Grow Strongly/strongbr /br /br /Romania's economy continues to put in a very strong performance and grew by an annual 9.1 percent in the third quarter, driven forward by the continuing consumption and lending boom, although most observers - including the the government - are agreed that all of this is now about to slow, and sharply. Indeed the government itself has forecast that growth will slow to about 4.5 percent next year, although others consider this to be rather overoptimistic under the circumstances and the big question is, just how "sharply" is sharply? Are we about to see one of those famous "hard landings"? There are reasons for believing that we may well be. /ppAt this point it is very hard to see just how far the economy actually slowed in the third quarter (at an annual rate it fell back from 9.3% to 9.1%, which really doesn't seem like very big beer), in the first place since we still lack detailed data, and in the second because don't publish or supply to Eurostat seasonally adjusted quarter on quarter data, which is really the most informative number we could get are hands on at this point, if it existed. So we are really stuck with "proxies" like short term retail sales data, and confidence indicators (unfortunately Romania doesn't seem to have much in the way of PMI surveys)./ppa href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STjby98xxAI/AAAAAAAALpc/dPo9FHnueu8/s1600-h/romania+GDP.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5276208632133960706" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 190px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STjby98xxAI/AAAAAAAALpc/dPo9FHnueu8/s320/romania+GDP.png" border="0" //abr /Despite all this, you could say, couldn't you, that Romanian GDP growth still does look pretty robust. You could say this, that is, until you look at what actually happened to Latvian GDP growth following the onset of a credit crunch in that country. As we can see in the chart below, the Latvian economy was cruising along at a nifty 11% annual growth rate until the third quarter of 2007, at which point things started to go nastily wrong, and headline GDP growth fell off a cliff, reaching the dizzy low of around minus 5% a mere four quarters later. And of course Latvia is now stuck in a very, very deep slump.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SRQ9-7COE2I/AAAAAAAALWc/3VxjefQe-0s/s1600-h/latvia+GDP.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5265902015511139170" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 200px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SRQ9-7COE2I/AAAAAAAALWc/3VxjefQe-0s/s320/latvia+GDP.png" border="0" //abr /So just what happened? Well basically, the Latvian economy was being driven to grow way too fast by a rapid increase in foreign exchange credit. And Latvia, like Romania, had large numbers of workers outside the country, busily sending home remittances, while wage inflation at home went up and up. As we can see in the chart below, this credit was effectively cut back sharply in the spring of 2007, and down came the Latvian economy on the back of the cut. As we can see in the earlier chart I presented, year on year increases in Romanian forex lending have now been slowing since the mid summer, and I think it is not unreasonable to suggest that there is a strong danger of following the Latvian path, especially after the "short sharp shock" of mid-October.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SNYqA0jUihI/AAAAAAAAH6M/kuMvDmZ0Jfs/s1600-h/latvia+household+debt.jpg"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5248428609342048786" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SNYqA0jUihI/AAAAAAAAH6M/kuMvDmZ0Jfs/s320/latvia+household+debt.jpg" border="0" //a So just when will Romania enter recession? At this point it is hard to say, but if the Latvian pattern is anything to go by, negative year on year growth could arrive as early as Q3/Q4 2009, and we might even see quarter on quarter contractions starting with Q1 2009 (although we won't necessarily know this, since, as I say, the data we need simply isn't published).br /br /strongGovernment Aid Packagebr //strongbr /In response to this deteriorating outlook the outgoing government did announce a stimulus package, which is scheduled to take effect in January, and involves items like exempting reinvested dividends from a 16 percent tax, giving companies a bonus of 1,000 euros for every person they hire who has been unemployed for more than three months and faciliating 500 million euros worth of investments and other aid for farmers. There is also an allocatation of 3 billion euros for job-creating investments, lower social insurance payments and a 250 million-euro credit line for medium and small businesses via a cash injection into state-owned bank CEC.br /br /The government will grant aid of as much as 50 million euros to companies planning to invest more than 100 million euros and create at least 500 jobs, according to the plan. Investments of less than 100 million euros that generate at least 300 jobs stand to receive aid which could total up to 28 million euros. It will also give companies a 5 percent reduction in their tax bill in exchange for paying taxes on time and exempt new car sales for a year from a "pollution tax'' that ranges from 150 euros to 700 euros per car.br /br /strongCredit Downgrades/strongbr /br /br /But all of this is likely to be of little avail, since it is mainly small scale counter cyclical stimulus if the international financial standing of Romania continues to deteriorate. In late October the international ratings agency Standard amp; Poor’s (Samp;P) cut Romania’s long- and short-term foreign-currency sovereign credit ratings from BBB-/A-3 to BB+/B, and its local-currency long-term rating from BBB to BBB-. Samp;P pointing out the growing risks posed by high and rising private-sector leverage and dependency on an increasingly uncertain external financing channel. Given the size of Romania’s macroeconomic imbalances, they argued, the economy is highly vulnerable to any sudden tightening in external financial conditions which could cause a sharp downturn in economic growth. /ppOn November 10 Fitch followed suit, and downgraded Romanian debt - together with that of Bulgaria, Hungary and Kazakhstan - two notches to what is effectively 'junk' status (specifically BB+) as a result of their "concerns about the macroeconomic policy framework in Romania" and the country's ability to avoid a severe economic and financial crisis. Noting the widening current account deficit - which is expected to exceed 14% of GDP this year - a deficit which Fitch believes has been fuelled by excessive credit growth, the agency argued that a much stronger policy adjustment, especially in the fiscal policy area, would have been needed to avoid a currency crisis. Fitch specifically drew attention to the private sector foreign currency balance sheet mismatches, and argued that any imminent currency crisis would "require substantial external financial support from the international community to prevent a sovereign credit crisis."br //ppFitch specifically singled out Emerging Europe as the most vulnerable Emerging Market region to the deterioration in the global financial and economic environment owing to the fact that so many countries have large current account deficits and relatively high levels of short-term external debt, and that these render them particularly susceptible to reduced capital and financial market flows (including from foreign parent banks). /pbr /pSince the onset of the credit crunch in August 2007, Fitch has now downgraded the foreign currency ratings of nine countries in emerging Europe (by a total of 11 notches), and this contrasts with just three upgrades that have been made over the same period. Eight countries are now on Negative Outlooks - which a record level for the region - while no countries are on Positive Outlooks, signalling that ratings remain under downward pressure. /ppstrongIMF Aid In The Pipeline?/strong/pbr /pObviously with the EU institutionally bogged down in its own issues of core and systemic bank bailouts, it is clear that the community's ability to offer meaningful assistance to Romania is going to be limited. Thus all eyes in Eastern Europe have been looking hopefully over in the direction of Washington, and the International Monetary Fund. The IMF has already offered aid to Hungary, Iceland, Serbia and Ukraine to help them cope with the difficult coktail of a credit drought, falling investment and shrinking government revenue. Romania, has so far not openly sought IMF help, although this does not mean that channels of communication and "dialogue" have not been opened. The sheer size of the current account deficit and the short term increase in the very sensitive area of government spending may make it increasingly difficult to fund the country’s $75 billion in external debt without IMF aid. In a statement to the local media, Juan Jose Fernandez-Ansola, the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) senior representative for Romania and Bulgaria recently observed that "The initiative to increase teachers' wages by 50% may need to be reconsidered. We estimate the impact on the budget would be modest in 2008, but would reach over 0.75% of GDP in 2009. In addition, if the increase were extended to other public sector employees, the impact could reach over 4% of GDP in 2009. This would send a wrong signal to financial markets." So it is not hard to see the kind of tack the IMF will be taking in any negotiations.br /br /However, there are important differences in the monetary systems of Romania on the one hand and the Baltic states and Bulgaria on the other, and these differences may facilitate rather than complicate the issue of IMF aid. The Baltics and Bulgaria all operate some variant of the currency board system, whereby the currencies are pegged to the euro at a fixed exchange rate (or within a narrow band), a feature which effectively prevents these economies from conducting their own independent monetary policy, thus placing the entire burden of macroeconomic adjustment on fiscal policy. The appreciation of the euro against the US dollar damaged the competitiveness of those economies vis-à-vis those economies whose currencies are linked to the dollar. Romania's managed-float on the exchange rate side has, in contrast, provided it with greater flexibility and some ability to utilise monetary policy as part of its macroeconomic stabilisation programme. /ppThus Romania has been able to resort to some degree of exchange rate depreciation to preserve external competitiveness over the past 12 months, while the central bank pushed up interest rates to keep real rates at positive levels and contain inflationary pressures. The complicating factor here has been the availability of substantial foreign exchange credit, at rates well below those imposed by the NBR. This has undoubtedly taken much of the cutting edge off central bank monetary policy in the short term, although as we are seeing, this supply of cheap credit has now, suddenly, "run dry".br /br /At the end of the day there is substantial agreement between all the main institutional actors (leaving aside Romania's own political class) - the NBR, the IMF, the EU Commission and the ECB - that Romania's external deficits are unsustainable in the long run; that fiscal policy has been ill-advisedly pro-cyclical; that wage growth has been excessive; that rapid credit-growth has been fuelling an unsustainable growth in consumption; and that a sharp and significant correction is now about to take place.br //pp/ppstrongThe Immediate Outlookbr //strongbr /br /This year's extremely good agricultural harvest has undoubtedly offered strong support to headline GDP growth in recent quarters, but this fortuitous virtuous circle may well repeat itself in 2009. On the other hand, the financial position of private households, after becoming ever more strained as domestic interest rates have steadily risen, together with the costs of servicing a growing volume of private debt, may well now deteriorate substantially as the lack of available credit and the rising layoffs in manufacturing industry exert an ever-tighter grip. In general terms, private consumption was already slowing before the onset of the credit crunch in October, and increased by 12.2 % yoy in Q2, following the record high of 14.3 % yoy in Q1. /ppInvestments also continued at a strong pace in Q2, driven mainly by new construction projects (up 34.8 % yoy), while investments in equipment was already slowing (down to 23.8 % yoy in Q2). In the first half of the year the construction sector absorbed 20 % of total investments in the economy, and it is this sector which will now be particularly hard hit./pbr /pSlowing construction activity is now expected for the rest of the year, and should become more pronounced as we enter 2009 and new project steadily dry up. Prices of new housing and real estate transactions generally have been losing momentum in recent months, especially in the capital city Bucharest. This slowdown can also be observed in the national construction activity index, which has seen the value of construction works drop to an annual 19.1 percent rise in October (down from 28.3 percent in September, and down even further from the average 33 % yoy increase registered in the first half of 2008) . Month on month, construction growth slowed to 5 percent in October from 8.5 percent in September. More importantly, the number of new building permits issued has now been showing a steady monthly decline. Evidently the volume of construction activity continues to rise (even if at a slower pace) since existing projects need to be completed - credit crunch or no credit crunch, and regardless of whether there will actually be buyers for the completed properties. But at some stage activity may well grind to a near halt, as the appetite for new building projects suddenly evaporates. This is what we have seen in other similarly affected economies, and there is no good reason why Romania should be any different here./ppThis view is reflected in the recent press statements made by Gabor Futo, executive manager of real estate developer Futureal Group. Futo takes the view that no new real estate projects will be started in the next two years and that 90 percent of the forthcoming ones already announced will be called off for lack of financing. Futo testifies to the way in which banks are now much more cautious in making loans and how developers are experiencing increasing difficulties in obtaining financing. Futureal recently started work on the new commercial center "Gold Plaza" in the northern city of Baia Mare. The center will have 30,000 square meters - all of them available for rent. The project aims to be completed in the first quarter of 2009 and will cost about 97 million euros. The company is a leading developer in Central and Eastern Europe, with projects worth more than 1.6 billion euros, including more than 6,000 residential units and some 500,000 square meters of commercial area./pp/ppAnd, of course, it isn't only the construction sector which is getting hit. Since the problem is the availability of credit rather than interest rates per se, then anything which can't simply be bought on a credit card will be affected, and first in line here is the Romanian auto industry which could register its first bankruptcies towards the end of the first half of 2009 according to Alin Tapalaga, Manager of Porsche Inter Auto, the retail division of the Porsche Romania . Tapalaga feels the most affected companies will be those who have recently built showrooms, and especially in the past year using bank loans as finance,./ppThe Romanian banks themselves are expecting a massive drop in lending to individuals in the last quarter of the year, especially for mortgage loans, despite forecasts of cheaper land and properties, following a worsening in lending conditions, according to a recent survey carried out by the central bank. Not surprsiningly, credit cards are the only lending product for which banks expect to see a slight increase in use in the last quarter, but even here they expect a much smaller increase than the one registered between July and September 2008. /ppbr /And all this reticence to spend comes despite (or perhaps because of) the fact that property prices are now falling. Three-room apartments in Bucharest have fallen by around 15 percent since the beginning of the year according to the the ZF real estate index. ZF suggest that prices nationally have dropped by 2 percent to 3 percent over the last six months, following stagnation or even slight increases earlier in the year. ZF compile their index by analysing prices asked by sellers on the anuntul.ro website. The value at which the deal is actually closed may be as much as 20 percent below the asking price they say. Whereas a typical seller was asking an average of 140,000 euros for a 70-square metre three-room apartment in January, the price reached 118,000 euros in November, or over 20,000 euros less. The sharpest monthly decline was registered in November, when the average price per square metre reached 1,686 euros, 5 percent lower than in October, according to the ZF analysis./ppstrongExporting Your Way Out Of Trouble?/strong/ppWith domestic demand now set to fall sharply, as people buy less property and large ticket items, while companies prune back investment in response, the only way forward for Romania to achieve economic growth - and pay off its debts - would appear to be through exports, since the fiscal policy arm has, as we have seen, been basically frittered away during the good times. But here we hit a big snag, since Romania runs a large goods and services trade strongdeficit/strong. In fact, between January and September 2008, Romania's balance-of-payments current account posted a deficit of 12.7 billion euros, up 14.8 percent over January-September 2007. The deterioration was largely a result of the wider trade deficit (13.7 billion euros), which was up 11.7 percent over the same period of last year. On the positive side exports did grow (19.4%) more rapidly than imports, but that will be of little consolation if exports need to drive an economy where domestic demand is either flat (best case) or declining. /ppAnd funding this deficit could become increasingly problematic, since foreign direct investment now covers only around one third of the gap in the current account, which means that foreign debt is on a strong upward spiral. Effectively this situation makes Romania susceptible to capital outflows in the medium term, and, were this to happen it would trigger a harsh real adjustment for Romania's economy and its citizens. /ppRomania needs to attract capital inflows (including FDI) in the region of 15 billion euros per year to cover a current-account deficit which is expected to exceed 13% of GDP. In 2008 alone it is estimated that the net external indebtedness of Romania will rise by some 6 billion euros. Non-publicly guaranteed external debt came in at 31.501 billion euros at the end of September, up 25.9 percent from year-end 2007. The NBR has, of course, built up a strong foreign exchange reserves (27 billion euros at the end of November, or around 8 months imports) and can more than likely ride out the change in market sentiment in the short run. Also foreign direct investment of 7.2 billion euros covered 56.6 percent of the current account deficit over the January-September period, with equity stakes and reinvested earnings making up 52.7 percent of the total, while intra group loans accounted for the other 47.3 percent. /ppBut at the end of the day, having the reserves to ride out the crisis (with or without the aid of the EU and the IMF) isn't really the problem. The problem is how you turn a credit-driven internal-demand-boom economy into one where new-found export competitiveness means external demand drives growth. And how you do this, while protecting all those heavily-forex-leveraged households form the more or less inevitable downward correction in the value of the leu. Obviously the path from one point to the other passes through a hell of a lot of what we economists call "creative destruction", but lets just hope for the sake of all those who have to live through this "correction" inside Romania don't find the whole process a far too painful one. /p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/romanias-economy-heads-off-quietly-and-with-no-fanfares-into-its-deepest-crisis-in-a-decade-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romania&#8217;s Economy Heads Off Quietly And With No Fanfares Into It&#8217;s Deepest  Crisis in a Decade</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/romanias-economy-heads-off-quietly-and-with-no-fanfares-into-its-deepest-crisis-in-a-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/romanias-economy-heads-off-quietly-and-with-no-fanfares-into-its-deepest-crisis-in-a-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 10:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abn Amro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregate bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alin Tapalaga;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baia Mare;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltic states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banca Transilvania;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bancpost;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Romania;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCR;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRD Groupe Société Générale;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bucharest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calin Popescu-Tariceanu;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEC;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank policy rate;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank year end target;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy price shocks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exempt new car sales;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EximBank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fact central bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fitch Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign-owned banking system remains;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Futureal Group;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabor Futo;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Plaza;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kazakhstan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lower social insurance payments;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetary systems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mugur Isarescu;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Bank of Romania;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overnight Interbank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[past year using bank loans;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porsche Inter Auto;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porsche Romania;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raiffeisen Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate index;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate transactions;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail division;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail sales strongfell/strong;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romanian Association of Automobile Producers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romanian government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romanian Labour Ministry;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romanian Parliament;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RON;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short term retail sales data;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-owned bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systemic bank bailouts;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Registry Office;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UniCredit Tiriac Bank;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Varujan Vosganian;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-8386138086209931038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: Barcelonabr /br /Controversy surrounding the Romanian economy is nothing new, nor, as a href="http://globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com/2008/11/romania-votes-under-new-electoral.html"Manuel points out in his post on the recent election/a, are Romanian politics strangers to tumult. Nonetheless the intensity of controversy has grown considerably of late, with a wide variety of assessments being offered concerning the likely impact of the intensifying international credit crisis on the short to medium term outlook for the Romanian economy.National Bank of Romania (NBR) governor, Mugur Isarescu, has been consistently arguing that the country should be able to avoid an excessively "hard landing"as the bank attempts to cool its evidently overheated economy and engages of fire-extinguising activities in the banking sector trying to control the impact of set of adverse external circumstances that are largely beyond its control. But most of these comments (or at least the more convincing ones) preceded the meltdown in the international financial markets which followed the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, the fallout from which has surely had a strong negative impact on Romania's economy and greatly complicated the task of conducting macroeconomic policy which faces the new government to be be formed following last weekends elections.br /br /The other complicating factor has been the "own goal" scored recently by the Romanian political process, with one politician after another proposing fiscal deficit raising policies, at just a time when the international financial markets have become extremely sensitive to just this development in countries which are, due to their large current account deficits, mainly dependent on external borrowing to finance their lending needs. The accommodative fiscal policy being run by the Romanian government has also been extremely ill advised at a time when the central bank was busy trying to cool overheating by applying a restrictive monetary policy. For policy to be coherent, the two main levers need to be operated in tandem, and not at cross purposes.br /br /However, despite all odds, Romania has been hanging on in there, and GDP remained strong in the third quarter, a situation which has lead some commentators to use the term "gravity defiers" to describe those East European economies, like Romania and Bulgaria, that have so far avoided having a sharp adjustment, despite having evidently unsound macroeconomic fundamentals, and in particular unsustainably large external deficits.br /br /Not everyone has been convinced by the positive posture being assumed from within Romania, however, and Fitch Ratings agency had already downgraded Romania's outlook (together with that of the Baltic states and Bulgaria) from stable to negative by August pointing out in the process that the economy was extremely vulnerable to external financial pressure. This association of Romania with the Baltics is not incidental, since the Baltic economies were until only very recently - as Romania is now - the fastest growing in the European Union (with rapid credit expansion and large current-account deficit, sound familiar) but have subsequently experienced a very sharp growth slowdown following a sharp tightening in domestic credit demand and a dropping-off of external demand after high internal inflation fuelled by very large annual wage rises destroyed competitiveness. Indeed both Latvia and Estonia are now in deep recession, and have moved in a matter of months from being the EU's fastest growing to being the EU's most rapidly contracting economies. This is precisely what the expression "boom-bust" really means.br /br /The million dollar question at this point is whether or not the Romanian economy is destined to follow along the same path. In the analysis that follows I will basically be arguing that this is exactly where the Romanian economy is now headed. Some evidence to back the view can be seen in the latest reading on the EU economic confidence indicator (see below) which after months of trending slowly and steadily downwards suddenly lurched sharply south in October and November. Another detail which we would do well to bear in mind is that after many months of consecutive rises, seasonally adjusted retail sales strongfell/strong in Romania (by 2.1%) in October over September. Indeed a growing quantity of anecdotal evidence now suggests that something important changed in Romania in October, even if we may yet need to wait several months to see the in the cold clear light of day the actual consequences of what happened. Another signal we have is that all is not exactly well, is that the number of newly-established companies increased only 0.7 percent in the year up to mid-November when compared with the same period last year, while bankruptcies soared according to the latest data from the Trade Registry Office (ONRC) - and in fact October was the month with most cases of insolvency, up a whopping 79 percent over October last year. In addition Romania's banks experienced a sharp liquidity crisis in mid October (see more below) and needed to borrow a total 49 billion lei (13 billion euros) in October from the central bank (using its lombard credit facility). This is 28 times the total amount borrowed between January and September 2008, according to NBR data. Banks only borrowed 20 million lei in lombard credits in September, while the total value of the loans issued was 1.75 billion lei between January and September.br /br /br /br /br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQJVh-ssqI/AAAAAAAALm0/Gtkzhhl0YmA/s1600-h/eu+sentiment+romania.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274851329060942498" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 189px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQJVh-ssqI/AAAAAAAALm0/Gtkzhhl0YmA/s320/eu+sentiment+romania.png" border="0" //abr /br /strongEvents Take Their Course/strongbr /br /br /blockquoteA capital-inflow-driven absorption boom has underpinned rapid catch-up growth but also fuelled macroeconomic imbalances. In particular, the external current-account deficit has risen to unsustainable levels. And, since mid-2007, headline CPI inflation has surged well above the central bank’s target, in part reflecting the firstround effects of food and energy price shocks. Rapid credit growth has raised risks to financial stability, although the largely foreign-owned banking system remains wellplaced to absorb shocks. In this setting, fiscal policy has been highly procyclical and lacked medium-term orientation.br /IMF Article IV Consultation, July 2008/blockquotepbr /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQLIp9AH6I/AAAAAAAALm8/VjUj_J2Rbrs/s1600-h/romania+ca+deficit.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274853306886266786" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 194px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQLIp9AH6I/AAAAAAAALm8/VjUj_J2Rbrs/s320/romania+ca+deficit.png" border="0" //a The IMF quote above basically spells out the general understanding economists have of what has been happening in Romania. Real GDP growth has been robust,but has increasingly been running up against capacity bottlenecks. Largescale emigration, notably to Italy and Spain, and high demand for workers, especially in construction, have resulted in tight labor market conditions. As a result, real wage growth has outpaced productivity growth, with buoyant public-sector wages adding to private-sector wage pressures. With core inflation under pressure, headline inflation has surged, partly owing to the firstround effects of shocks to energy and food prices, and to some extent reflecting the 2007 drought. However the initial shock has evidently moved over into second round effects, and price setters, faced with higher unit labor and other input costs, have been struggling to maintain their markups, as also indicated by surging producer-price inflation. /ppIt is in this context that the fact that fiscal policy stance in 2007 was highly procyclical becomes a problem. The fiscal deficit increased in 2007 to 2.25 percent of GDP, up from 0.5 percent of GDP in 2006. Adjusted for the automatic effects of the booming economy on the fiscal position, the IMF estimated that the 2007 structural deficit rose to almost 4 percent of GDP. As a result, the fiscal stance was highly expansionary, adding an estimated net fiscal stimulus of 2 percent of GDP to an already overheating economy. Thus the Romanian economy was simply booming along just waiting for something unfortunate to happen, and, of course, true to form and as was to be expected, it eventually did.br /br /strongOctobers "Sudden-Stop" Credit Crunch/strongbr /br /Bank lending seems to have ground to a virtual halt in Romania in mid October (and October is the latest month for which we have statistics from the National Bank of Romania). After rising at a monthy rate of 4% (or a 50% annual rate) in September, total lending to households and non financial corporations actually strongfell/strong in October (when compared with September) by 0.6%. For an economy which has been experiencing a debt driven consumer and construction boom it is hard to overstate the significance of this single fact. We seem to have what is known as a "sudden stop" in aggregate bank lending here, and the Romanian economy may now well fall rapidly into recession, following the tried and tested path so recently pioneered by Latvia and Estonia.br /br /While RON denominated lending continued to advance slightly, the largest hit appears to be being taken - not really surprisingly - by forex loans, which fell in total by 1.5% in total month on month (-1.9% corporates, -1.2% households). Given that the RON strengthened slightly against the euro during the month the decline was probably less than it appears (since the book value in RON of forex loans falls when the Leu strengthens - and vice versa - and this revaluation is of course the great danger represented by a sudden Leu slide, since not only will the monthly payments on the mortgages shoot up, so too will the capital value of the outstanding mortgage, as anyone unfortunate enough to have taken out a loan in Japanese Yen, or CHF, surely already knows to their cost). But basically, since the currency fluctuated wildly but was actually up against the euro by 1.5% in October, we really do need to wait till we get to see what happened in November to have a clearer picture.br //ppa href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQH3w7cmaI/AAAAAAAALms/T0BiBrQqBHQ/s1600-h/romania+lending+2.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274849718166133154" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 172px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQH3w7cmaI/AAAAAAAALms/T0BiBrQqBHQ/s320/romania+lending+2.png" border="0" //abr /br /However, if we look back over the two months of September and October (where the currency fluctuations to some extent cancel each other out, but that overall the leu weakened 4.5% against the euro) then it is clear there has been a sharp slowdown in forex lending, and the effects of this slowdown will gradually be felt over the next six to nine months. Well, gradually or not so gradually, since new car sales (which obviously normally need finance) fell by nearly 30% year on year in October (to 20,478 from 29,347 a year earlier), according to the latest data from the Romanian Association of Automobile Producers amp; Importers. Basically if we look at the pattern which we can see in other economies which have been affected by the credit crunch, what started off as a slowdown in demand for cars as oil prices rose "transited" to an inability to finance purchases as oil prices fell back again. Hence the current difficulties of motor industry "majors" like Ford and General Motors.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQHQyWKvwI/AAAAAAAALmk/XjUF9PNvG2A/s1600-h/romania+household+credit.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274849048531746562" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 154px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQHQyWKvwI/AAAAAAAALmk/XjUF9PNvG2A/s320/romania+household+credit.png" border="0" //abr /br /strongFiscal Deficit Issues/strong/ppAnother area of concern has been Romania's budget deficit, which stood at 2.4% in 2007, and is expected to widen in 2008 and 2009 . A number of factors are contributing to this steady deterioration:br /br /1) the rising cost of government borrowing;br /2) forecasts of a sharp decline in GDP growth for 2009br /3) enactment of spending pledges made by candidates ahead of Nov-08 electionsbr /br /br /Romania's loose fiscal policy stance and the growing public spending commitments were among the key reasons cited by credit ratings agencies for the recent downgrades in Romanian debt to what is effectively 'junk' status. Indeed Finance Minister Varujan Vosganian recently estimated that spending increases authorised by parliament before last weeks elections could widen the budget deficit considerably beyond the EU’s 3% of GDP limit, and some estimates suggest that, on a worst case scenario, it could possibly even amount to as much as 7% of GDP in 2009. /ppIndeed it looks as if the deficit could even pass the 3% level in 2008 (the year of such a rapid expansion, there is surely no excuse for this) since the 11 month budget deficit widened to 2.9% of GDP following a sharp drop in budget revenues over the last two months according to Varujan Vosganian last week. Vosganian told a press conference that budget revenues in October and November were 1.3 billion euros below the projected level.br /br /Perhaps the highest profile decision in the context of the recent Romanian fiscal deficit "cause celebre" was the one taken on 8 October by the Romanian Parliament, when it agreed to a pay rise for teachers which was calculated to be in the region of 50%, and this against the explicit wishes of Calin Popescu Tariceanu, the prime minister, who headed the then minority liberal government. The main worry arising from the teachers’ pay increase, aside from the concerns over how it will be funded, centres on the impact it will have on the pay demands of other public-sector workers and, in turn, of private-sector workers. If such wage pressures are not resisted, then they will obviously only weaken further an already weakened Romanian competitiveness and in all probability would drive inflation back above the 10% mark in 2009. This would be the result in normal circumstances, but the Romanian economy is not in normal circumstances right now, and it is highly unlikely that the present credit crunch and the pressure from the international financial markets will leave time for this inflation spiral to run its course. Much more urgent matters are likely to make their presence felt first.br /br /Varujan Vosganian seems to be tirelessly explaining in the face of deaf ears that the proposed increase could push the budget deficit up in the direction of 7% of GDP in 2009, as no provision had been made to raise taxation, and the outgoing government issued an emergency ordinance on October 28th postponing the increase, following a warning from the IMF about the likely fiscal consequences.br /br /Defenders of the recent decisions, however, are quick to point out that Romania's accumulated public debt, at around 12% of GDP, is still extremely low. But this is to miss the force of the macroeconomic argument against running such annual deficits at time of high GDP growth. Basically, at this point, the Romanian economy has been overheating (and has not been stuck deep in recession), so the principal macro argument would be in favour of fiscal surpluses (and substantial ones, say 3% or 4% of GDP) to try and drain excess demand from the system. This is doubly the case when you look at the underlying difficulties of applying standard monetary policy (the central bank has been raising interest rates since to try and keep inflation better under control) in a context where foreign exchange denominated loans have been freely available at what effectively amount to negative interest rates. /pbr /pAlthough the government has made an effort to promote a more prudent fiscal policy, the temptation to win more voters has proved to be stronger. Consequently, the government decided to increase the benchmark index for calculating individual pensions by 20 % to RON 697.5 as of November earlier than originally planned. The benchmark index was already increased in November 2007 by 35 % and by another 7.5 % in January 2008. It will be further raised next January to complete the promised reform of the pension system aimed at bringing the average pension to 45 % of the average gross wage from the level of 35.5 % in November 2007. Doubtless we will soon here complaints about how "internation financial speculators" have brought the Romanian economy to its knees, but such voices would do a lot better looking at the degree of responsibility exercised by Romanian politicians in the face of the world's worst financial crisis in over 75 years, in a climate were concerns about procyclical fiscal deficits are known to be widespread.br /br /strongSubstantial Inflation Pressures Remain/strongbr /br /Inflation lies at the heart of the mechanism which has been steadily - via the expansionary fiscal posture - undoing the Romanian economy, and, right on cue, Romanian inflation increased again in October, hitting 7.4 percent, after dropping back to 7.3 percent in September. Consumer prices were up 1.1 percent month on month. /ppa href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STkW7t1BdzI/AAAAAAAALpk/w8k9N1lcnkQ/s1600-h/romania+inflation.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5276273653611329330" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 184px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STkW7t1BdzI/AAAAAAAALpk/w8k9N1lcnkQ/s320/romania+inflation.png" border="0" //abr /br /In the Romanian context it is impossible to relate this inflationary pressure exclusively to rising energy and food costs, doubly so since these latter have now been falling steadily since July. The Romanian economy has been running at a much faster pace than it can comfortably sustain, and nowhere has this been clearer than in the strong upward pressure on wages, with net wages growing at an annual 24.6 percent in September while unemployment continued to hover near a 16-year low. In fact annual net wages increases have averaged around 24% over the last 6 months (see chart below), while real wage increases (allowing for inflation) have averaged around 15% throughout 2008.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STkn2uOhgGI/AAAAAAAALps/wpGj4xa28sg/s1600-h/romania+wages.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5276292259516612706" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 190px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STkn2uOhgGI/AAAAAAAALps/wpGj4xa28sg/s320/romania+wages.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /Monthly unemployment has been running at around 3.9% of the labour force (or 350,000 people) according to data from the Romanian Labour Ministry, or at around 5.9% according to the EU harmonised rate published by Eurostat (the difference between these two numbers is due to the different methodologies and criteria used). In either case these are historically quite low rates for the Romanian economy, and it needs to be borne in mind that there are at least a million Romanians (or another 10% of the labour force) working abroad (largely in Spain and Italy) most of them sending monthly remittances home to their families and relatives, remittances which in their turn fuel domestic demand, demand which the economy lacks sufficient capacity to meet without putting pressure on inflation.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STk3eM6MT-I/AAAAAAAALp0/2cXqPvgbbYo/s1600-h/romania+unemployment.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5276309430442151906" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 185px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STk3eM6MT-I/AAAAAAAALp0/2cXqPvgbbYo/s320/romania+unemployment.png" border="0" //a Of course, having made the point so forcefully about how much of a problem inflation has been in the Romanian economy, I think I should point out that this problem may well be set to disappear, or at least become somewhat less important in the general picture, should the Romanian slowdown prove to be as dramtic as I fear it might. We could move very rapidly from a situation of undercapacity and overheating to one of excess capacity, and sharp cooling as domestic demand folds and exports stagnate. Naturally everything depends on what happens to the Leu, since if we see a further substantial weakening in the currency this in itself will tend to add to inflation pressures, depending on how large a fall in the currency we are talking about.br /br /br /strongMonetary Policy and the Leubr //strongbr /The Romania central bank which has been using monetary policy as best as it is able to try and fight the inflation threat, kept its key policy rate - which is the second highest in the EU after the 11% rate in Hungary - unchanged at 10.25% in October, although they did lowered reserve requirement on leu deposits (to 18% from 20%, as of November 24) in an attempt to ease the growing pressure on domestic liquidity which has been so evident since the mini financial crisis of mid October.br //ppa href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQo8JwbrVI/AAAAAAAALnE/JHIxXwtLP9s/s1600-h/romania+cb+rate.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274886077434015058" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 197px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STQo8JwbrVI/AAAAAAAALnE/JHIxXwtLP9s/s320/romania+cb+rate.png" border="0" //abr /br /Further monetary tightening (following the Hungarian example) might have seemed a more prudent strategy, particularly given the current comparatively low level of the real policy rate (only 2.75% above inflation), the continuing inflation pressures, the continuing loose fiscal stance and the recent credit rating downgrade from Samp;P. There is also the credibility issue to take into account, since Romanian inflation is still running well above the central bank year end target of 3.8%. On the other hand, if we take account of the rapid deterioration in the internal economic climate since October, then exercising caution may have been more sensible than it seems at first sight. The problem is that the Romanian central bank - like its Hungarian counterpart - is now caught between the need to protect the value of the Leu (given the prior level of forex borrowing) and the need to try to offset the rapid and dramatic decline in internal demand.br /br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STRNZPqlJiI/AAAAAAAALnM/dl6ECsj0-fU/s1600-h/euro+leu+cross.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274926159654888994" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 184px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STRNZPqlJiI/AAAAAAAALnM/dl6ECsj0-fU/s320/euro+leu+cross.png" border="0" //abr /Just what kind of pressure we could see on the Leu in the coming weeks was illustrated during the days between 10 and 20 October, when the tremendous pressure on the currency (see spike in chart above) forced the Romanian cenbank to intervene directly in the foreign exchange market to defend the currency. Questions remain about the extent to which any local tightening policy can work while private indebtedness continues to be fueled by forex denominated (largely euro) loans and the NBR is sure to face increasingly difficult decisions as growth slows in the coming monthsbr /br /In fact central bank Governor Mugur Isarescu argued that the bank responded to an "attack on the leu'' which had drained lei from the market and driven overnight interbank market rates sharply higher. The Banca Nationala a Romaniei sold 40 million euros on October 10 for lei on the interbank market and the Finance Ministry sold 291 million lei of three-year bonds on October 16. Overnight Interbank Bid Rates (ROBID) soared to 19 percent on October 17 (up from 16.53 percent on October 16) as banks frantically tried to get their hands on lei. Rates have subsequently come back down again, but at the start of December they were still hovering in the 12% to 13% range, well above the 7% to 8% range of January 2008, and also well above the 10.25% targeted central bank policy rate. Basically these rates seem to have gotten completely out of alignment with central bank policy towards the end of August, and there seems to be little evidence (or likelihood) that they will be coming back into line anytime in the near future (see a href="http://www.bnro.ro/en/Info/Istoric/BB_istoric.asp"the time series for yourself here/a - also anyone looking for a quick and handy list of banks with exposure to the Romanian market, a href="http://www.ebrd.com/new/pressrel/2008/080307a.htm"the quoting banks for ROBOR/a are ABN Amro, Bancpost, Banca Transilvania, BRD Groupe Société Générale, BCR, CEC, EximBank, ING, Raiffeisen Bank and UniCredit Tiriac Bank)./ppSome analysts question whether Romania can finshy;ance its 59 billion euros in external debt without International Monetary Fund support of the kind secured by neighbours Hungary and Ukraine if such "attacks" continue to occur. The leu has now slipped 7 per cent against the euro since August, while the Romanian stockmarket is down 71% in the year to date and the leu has weakened by 21% against the US dollar over the same period.br /br /strongRomania's GDP Continues To Grow Strongly/strongbr /br /br /Romania's economy continues to put in a very strong performance and grew by an annual 9.1 percent in the third quarter, driven forward by the continuing consumption and lending boom, although most observers - including the the government - are agreed that all of this is now about to slow, and sharply. Indeed the government itself has forecast that growth will slow to about 4.5 percent next year, although others consider this to be rather overoptimistic under the circumstances and the big question is, just how "sharply" is sharply? Are we about to see one of those famous "hard landings"? There are reasons for believing that we may well be. /ppAt this point it is very hard to see just how far the economy actually slowed in the third quarter (at an annual rate it fell back from 9.3% to 9.1%, which really doesn't seem like very big beer), in the first place since we still lack detailed data, and in the second because don't publish or supply to Eurostat seasonally adjusted quarter on quarter data, which is really the most informative number we could get are hands on at this point, if it existed. So we are really stuck with "proxies" like short term retail sales data, and confidence indicators (unfortunately Romania doesn't seem to have much in the way of PMI surveys)./ppa href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STjby98xxAI/AAAAAAAALpc/dPo9FHnueu8/s1600-h/romania+GDP.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5276208632133960706" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 190px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/STjby98xxAI/AAAAAAAALpc/dPo9FHnueu8/s320/romania+GDP.png" border="0" //abr /Despite all this, you could say, couldn't you, that Romanian GDP growth still does look pretty robust. You could say this, that is, until you look at what actually happened to Latvian GDP growth following the onset of a credit crunch in that country. As we can see in the chart below, the Latvian economy was cruising along at a nifty 11% annual growth rate until the third quarter of 2007, at which point things started to go nastily wrong, and headline GDP growth fell off a cliff, reaching the dizzy low of around minus 5% a mere four quarters later. And of course Latvia is now stuck in a very, very deep slump.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SRQ9-7COE2I/AAAAAAAALWc/3VxjefQe-0s/s1600-h/latvia+GDP.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5265902015511139170" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 200px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SRQ9-7COE2I/AAAAAAAALWc/3VxjefQe-0s/s320/latvia+GDP.png" border="0" //abr /So just what happened? Well basically, the Latvian economy was being driven to grow way too fast by a rapid increase in foreign exchange credit. And Latvia, like Romania, had large numbers of workers outside the country, busily sending home remittances, while wage inflation at home went up and up. As we can see in the chart below, this credit was effectively cut back sharply in the spring of 2007, and down came the Latvian economy on the back of the cut. As we can see in the earlier chart I presented, year on year increases in Romanian forex lending have now been slowing since the mid summer, and I think it is not unreasonable to suggest that there is a strong danger of following the Latvian path, especially after the "short sharp shock" of mid-October.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SNYqA0jUihI/AAAAAAAAH6M/kuMvDmZ0Jfs/s1600-h/latvia+household+debt.jpg"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5248428609342048786" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SNYqA0jUihI/AAAAAAAAH6M/kuMvDmZ0Jfs/s320/latvia+household+debt.jpg" border="0" //a So just when will Romania enter recession? At this point it is hard to say, but if the Latvian pattern is anything to go by, negative year on year growth could arrive as early as Q3/Q4 2009, and we might even see quarter on quarter contractions starting with Q1 2009 (although we won't necessarily know this, since, as I say, the data we need simply isn't published).br /br /strongGovernment Aid Packagebr //strongbr /In response to this deteriorating outlook the outgoing government did announce a stimulus package, which is scheduled to take effect in January, and involves items like exempting reinvested dividends from a 16 percent tax, giving companies a bonus of 1,000 euros for every person they hire who has been unemployed for more than three months and faciliating 500 million euros worth of investments and other aid for farmers. There is also an allocatation of 3 billion euros for job-creating investments, lower social insurance payments and a 250 million-euro credit line for medium and small businesses via a cash injection into state-owned bank CEC.br /br /The government will grant aid of as much as 50 million euros to companies planning to invest more than 100 million euros and create at least 500 jobs, according to the plan. Investments of less than 100 million euros that generate at least 300 jobs stand to receive aid which could total up to 28 million euros. It will also give companies a 5 percent reduction in their tax bill in exchange for paying taxes on time and exempt new car sales for a year from a "pollution tax'' that ranges from 150 euros to 700 euros per car.br /br /strongCredit Downgrades/strongbr /br /br /But all of this is likely to be of little avail, since it is mainly small scale counter cyclical stimulus if the international financial standing of Romania continues to deteriorate. In late October the international ratings agency Standard amp; Poor’s (Samp;P) cut Romania’s long- and short-term foreign-currency sovereign credit ratings from BBB-/A-3 to BB+/B, and its local-currency long-term rating from BBB to BBB-. Samp;P pointing out the growing risks posed by high and rising private-sector leverage and dependency on an increasingly uncertain external financing channel. Given the size of Romania’s macroeconomic imbalances, they argued, the economy is highly vulnerable to any sudden tightening in external financial conditions which could cause a sharp downturn in economic growth. /ppOn November 10 Fitch followed suit, and downgraded Romanian debt - together with that of Bulgaria, Hungary and Kazakhstan - two notches to what is effectively 'junk' status (specifically BB+) as a result of their "concerns about the macroeconomic policy framework in Romania" and the country's ability to avoid a severe economic and financial crisis. Noting the widening current account deficit - which is expected to exceed 14% of GDP this year - a deficit which Fitch believes has been fuelled by excessive credit growth, the agency argued that a much stronger policy adjustment, especially in the fiscal policy area, would have been needed to avoid a currency crisis. Fitch specifically drew attention to the private sector foreign currency balance sheet mismatches, and argued that any imminent currency crisis would "require substantial external financial support from the international community to prevent a sovereign credit crisis."br //ppFitch specifically singled out Emerging Europe as the most vulnerable Emerging Market region to the deterioration in the global financial and economic environment owing to the fact that so many countries have large current account deficits and relatively high levels of short-term external debt, and that these render them particularly susceptible to reduced capital and financial market flows (including from foreign parent banks). /pbr /pSince the onset of the credit crunch in August 2007, Fitch has now downgraded the foreign currency ratings of nine countries in emerging Europe (by a total of 11 notches), and this contrasts with just three upgrades that have been made over the same period. Eight countries are now on Negative Outlooks - which a record level for the region - while no countries are on Positive Outlooks, signalling that ratings remain under downward pressure. /ppstrongIMF Aid In The Pipeline?/strong/pbr /pObviously with the EU institutionally bogged down in its own issues of core and systemic bank bailouts, it is clear that the community's ability to offer meaningful assistance to Romania is going to be limited. Thus all eyes in Eastern Europe have been looking hopefully over in the direction of Washington, and the International Monetary Fund. The IMF has already offered aid to Hungary, Iceland, Serbia and Ukraine to help them cope with the difficult coktail of a credit drought, falling investment and shrinking government revenue. Romania, has so far not openly sought IMF help, although this does not mean that channels of communication and "dialogue" have not been opened. The sheer size of the current account deficit and the short term increase in the very sensitive area of government spending may make it increasingly difficult to fund the country’s $75 billion in external debt without IMF aid. In a statement to the local media, Juan Jose Fernandez-Ansola, the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) senior representative for Romania and Bulgaria recently observed that "The initiative to increase teachers' wages by 50% may need to be reconsidered. We estimate the impact on the budget would be modest in 2008, but would reach over 0.75% of GDP in 2009. In addition, if the increase were extended to other public sector employees, the impact could reach over 4% of GDP in 2009. This would send a wrong signal to financial markets." So it is not hard to see the kind of tack the IMF will be taking in any negotiations.br /br /However, there are important differences in the monetary systems of Romania on the one hand and the Baltic states and Bulgaria on the other, and these differences may facilitate rather than complicate the issue of IMF aid. The Baltics and Bulgaria all operate some variant of the currency board system, whereby the currencies are pegged to the euro at a fixed exchange rate (or within a narrow band), a feature which effectively prevents these economies from conducting their own independent monetary policy, thus placing the entire burden of macroeconomic adjustment on fiscal policy. The appreciation of the euro against the US dollar damaged the competitiveness of those economies vis-à-vis those economies whose currencies are linked to the dollar. Romania's managed-float on the exchange rate side has, in contrast, provided it with greater flexibility and some ability to utilise monetary policy as part of its macroeconomic stabilisation programme. /ppThus Romania has been able to resort to some degree of exchange rate depreciation to preserve external competitiveness over the past 12 months, while the central bank pushed up interest rates to keep real rates at positive levels and contain inflationary pressures. The complicating factor here has been the availability of substantial foreign exchange credit, at rates well below those imposed by the NBR. This has undoubtedly taken much of the cutting edge off central bank monetary policy in the short term, although as we are seeing, this supply of cheap credit has now, suddenly, "run dry".br /br /At the end of the day there is substantial agreement between all the main institutional actors (leaving aside Romania's own political class) - the NBR, the IMF, the EU Commission and the ECB - that Romania's external deficits are unsustainable in the long run; that fiscal policy has been ill-advisedly pro-cyclical; that wage growth has been excessive; that rapid credit-growth has been fuelling an unsustainable growth in consumption; and that a sharp and significant correction is now about to take place.br //pp/ppstrongThe Immediate Outlookbr //strongbr /br /This year's extremely good agricultural harvest has undoubtedly offered strong support to headline GDP growth in recent quarters, but this fortuitous virtuous circle may well repeat itself in 2009. On the other hand, the financial position of private households, after becoming ever more strained as domestic interest rates have steadily risen, together with the costs of servicing a growing volume of private debt, may well now deteriorate substantially as the lack of available credit and the rising layoffs in manufacturing industry exert an ever-tighter grip. In general terms, private consumption was already slowing before the onset of the credit crunch in October, and increased by 12.2 % yoy in Q2, following the record high of 14.3 % yoy in Q1. /ppInvestments also continued at a strong pace in Q2, driven mainly by new construction projects (up 34.8 % yoy), while investments in equipment was already slowing (down to 23.8 % yoy in Q2). In the first half of the year the construction sector absorbed 20 % of total investments in the economy, and it is this sector which will now be particularly hard hit./pbr /pSlowing construction activity is now expected for the rest of the year, and should become more pronounced as we enter 2009 and new project steadily dry up. Prices of new housing and real estate transactions generally have been losing momentum in recent months, especially in the capital city Bucharest. This slowdown can also be observed in the national construction activity index, which has seen the value of construction works drop to an annual 19.1 percent rise in October (down from 28.3 percent in September, and down even further from the average 33 % yoy increase registered in the first half of 2008) . Month on month, construction growth slowed to 5 percent in October from 8.5 percent in September. More importantly, the number of new building permits issued has now been showing a steady monthly decline. Evidently the volume of construction activity continues to rise (even if at a slower pace) since existing projects need to be completed - credit crunch or no credit crunch, and regardless of whether there will actually be buyers for the completed properties. But at some stage activity may well grind to a near halt, as the appetite for new building projects suddenly evaporates. This is what we have seen in other similarly affected economies, and there is no good reason why Romania should be any different here./ppThis view is reflected in the recent press statements made by Gabor Futo, executive manager of real estate developer Futureal Group. Futo takes the view that no new real estate projects will be started in the next two years and that 90 percent of the forthcoming ones already announced will be called off for lack of financing. Futo testifies to the way in which banks are now much more cautious in making loans and how developers are experiencing increasing difficulties in obtaining financing. Futureal recently started work on the new commercial center "Gold Plaza" in the northern city of Baia Mare. The center will have 30,000 square meters - all of them available for rent. The project aims to be completed in the first quarter of 2009 and will cost about 97 million euros. The company is a leading developer in Central and Eastern Europe, with projects worth more than 1.6 billion euros, including more than 6,000 residential units and some 500,000 square meters of commercial area./pp/ppAnd, of course, it isn't only the construction sector which is getting hit. Since the problem is the availability of credit rather than interest rates per se, then anything which can't simply be bought on a credit card will be affected, and first in line here is the Romanian auto industry which could register its first bankruptcies towards the end of the first half of 2009 according to Alin Tapalaga, Manager of Porsche Inter Auto, the retail division of the Porsche Romania . Tapalaga feels the most affected companies will be those who have recently built showrooms, and especially in the past year using bank loans as finance,./ppThe Romanian banks themselves are expecting a massive drop in lending to individuals in the last quarter of the year, especially for mortgage loans, despite forecasts of cheaper land and properties, following a worsening in lending conditions, according to a recent survey carried out by the central bank. Not surprsiningly, credit cards are the only lending product for which banks expect to see a slight increase in use in the last quarter, but even here they expect a much smaller increase than the one registered between July and September 2008. /ppbr /And all this reticence to spend comes despite (or perhaps because of) the fact that property prices are now falling. Three-room apartments in Bucharest have fallen by around 15 percent since the beginning of the year according to the the ZF real estate index. ZF suggest that prices nationally have dropped by 2 percent to 3 percent over the last six months, following stagnation or even slight increases earlier in the year. ZF compile their index by analysing prices asked by sellers on the anuntul.ro website. The value at which the deal is actually closed may be as much as 20 percent below the asking price they say. Whereas a typical seller was asking an average of 140,000 euros for a 70-square metre three-room apartment in January, the price reached 118,000 euros in November, or over 20,000 euros less. The sharpest monthly decline was registered in November, when the average price per square metre reached 1,686 euros, 5 percent lower than in October, according to the ZF analysis./ppstrongExporting Your Way Out Of Trouble?/strong/ppWith domestic demand now set to fall sharply, as people buy less property and large ticket items, while companies prune back investment in response, the only way forward for Romania to achieve economic growth - and pay off its debts - would appear to be through exports, since the fiscal policy arm has, as we have seen, been basically frittered away during the good times. But here we hit a big snag, since Romania runs a large goods and services trade strongdeficit/strong. In fact, between January and September 2008, Romania's balance-of-payments current account posted a deficit of 12.7 billion euros, up 14.8 percent over January-September 2007. The deterioration was largely a result of the wider trade deficit (13.7 billion euros), which was up 11.7 percent over the same period of last year. On the positive side exports did grow (19.4%) more rapidly than imports, but that will be of little consolation if exports need to drive an economy where domestic demand is either flat (best case) or declining. /ppAnd funding this deficit could become increasingly problematic, since foreign direct investment now covers only around one third of the gap in the current account, which means that foreign debt is on a strong upward spiral. Effectively this situation makes Romania susceptible to capital outflows in the medium term, and, were this to happen it would trigger a harsh real adjustment for Romania's economy and its citizens. /ppRomania needs to attract capital inflows (including FDI) in the region of 15 billion euros per year to cover a current-account deficit which is expected to exceed 13% of GDP. In 2008 alone it is estimated that the net external indebtedness of Romania will rise by some 6 billion euros. Non-publicly guaranteed external debt came in at 31.501 billion euros at the end of September, up 25.9 percent from year-end 2007. The NBR has, of course, built up a strong foreign exchange reserves (27 billion euros at the end of November, or around 8 months imports) and can more than likely ride out the change in market sentiment in the short run. Also foreign direct investment of 7.2 billion euros covered 56.6 percent of the current account deficit over the January-September period, with equity stakes and reinvested earnings making up 52.7 percent of the total, while intra group loans accounted for the other 47.3 percent. /ppBut at the end of the day, having the reserves to ride out the crisis (with or without the aid of the EU and the IMF) isn't really the problem. The problem is how you turn a credit-driven internal-demand-boom economy into one where new-found export competitiveness means external demand drives growth. And how you do this, while protecting all those heavily-forex-leveraged households form the more or less inevitable downward correction in the value of the leu. Obviously the path from one point to the other passes through a hell of a lot of what we economists call "creative destruction", but lets just hope for the sake of all those who have to live through this "correction" inside Romania don't find the whole process a far too painful one. /p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/romanias-economy-heads-off-quietly-and-with-no-fanfares-into-its-deepest-crisis-in-a-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A ‘Credit Cycle Bust’ That Cannot Be Stopped</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-%e2%80%98credit-cycle-bust%e2%80%99-that-cannot-be-stopped/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-%e2%80%98credit-cycle-bust%e2%80%99-that-cannot-be-stopped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Sagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Soros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Resource Investments;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Davidson;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Stuart Mill;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Tax Payers Union;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over-leveraged  financial services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the  more;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=9581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p style="text-align: left;"This is no ordinary downturn. After the biggest credit bubble in history, we face a correction on an unimaginable scale. Make no mistake about it: This is a credit-cycle bust that the government cannot stop. The losses are already catastrophic. And the massive unwinding is nowhere near finished yet#8230;/p
p style="text-align: left;"The following is an excerpt from a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/bill-bonner/"  class="alinks_links"Bill Bonner/a and James Davidson#8217;s crisis report, emHow to Survive and Prosper in the Coming Global Depression./em/p
pContrarian Profits readers are probably familiar will Bill#8217;s commentary from his a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links"Daily Reckoning/a column. But here is some information about James Davidson:/p
pDavidson is a self-made multi-millionaire, venture capitalist and best-selling author./p
pHis books include Blood in the Streets, Financial Reckoning Day and The Sovereign Individual./p
pAs an author and editor of private financial advisory#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-%e2%80%98credit-cycle-bust%e2%80%99-that-cannot-be-stopped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Country That Was A Hedge Fund</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-country-that-was-a-hedge-fund/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-country-that-was-a-hedge-fund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Nusbaum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[That Was A Hedge Fund;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8532070.post-4300760281886881414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZckZ-8naz0/STWJ2H6Am7I/AAAAAAAACOg/VQc6DcFdOYk/s1600-h/Iceland+036.jpg"img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 300px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZckZ-8naz0/STWJ2H6Am7I/AAAAAAAACOg/VQc6DcFdOYk/s400/Iceland+036.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5275274101462703026" border="0" //abr /A good read on what happened in Iceland a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/01/magazines/fortune/iceland_gumbel.fortune/index.htm?section=money_latest"from Fortune/a.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-country-that-was-a-hedge-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back to Risk Aversion</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/back-to-risk-aversion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/back-to-risk-aversion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carter Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commodity futures trading commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HKD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koruna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark O Byrne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Bureau of Economic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLN;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reserve Bank Of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Reserve Bank of New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Sec;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=9326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pJapanese yen rallies#8230;  Renminbi stumbles#8230;  A very tough data week in store#8230;  Rate cuts all around the world#8230;                                     And Now#8230; Today#8217;s Pfennig!br /
Well#8230; When I left you last Wednesday, I had thought that we could be on the cusp of a #8220;change#8221; in the currencies, as the Trading Theme that had held a tight grip on the currencies since July, was thrown to the side for a couple of days#8230; But, I doubt #8220;that#8221; has happened, as a return to risk aversion is back on the table, which means the currencies and precious metals get sold, while Japanese yen, and U.S. Treasuries (read dollars) get bought./p
pAnd Japanese yen is #8220;getting bought!#8221; Yen is trading in the 93 range this morning#8230; Strong,#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/back-to-risk-aversion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And Then There’s This…Wednesday, November 26th, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6wednesday-november-26th-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6wednesday-november-26th-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Far East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Weil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reykjavik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thanksgiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Commodity Futures Trading  Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=9185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pTuesday was the third day in a row that gold and silver got sold off as soon as trading began in the Far East#8230;and as I write this, Wednesday morning in Asia is shaping up the same way. Gold was down about $15 when the Comex opened in New York on Tuesday#8230;and a ferocious $25 rally (tech funds?) got stopped dead in its tracks at precisely 9:00 a.m. Eastern time#8230;the second day in a row it didn#8217;t get past $830 the ounce. Silver#8217;s fate was similar. Both sold off from there and both finished basically unchanged from Monday. The HUI traded as low as 218#8230;but managed to tack a 5% gain onto that number to close in slightly positive territory#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/and-then-there%e2%80%99s-this%e2%80%a6wednesday-november-26th-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iceland Gets $11 Billion Bailout</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/iceland-gets-11-billion-bailout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/iceland-gets-11-billion-bailout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danske Bank A/S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failed bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lipsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landsbanki Islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lars Christensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reykjavik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=8869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Iceland today (Thursday) secured nearly $11 billion in loans from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and other nations. The bailout will help the island nation stabilize its currency and recapitalize its banks, but it will also saddle its tiny population with a huge debt burden.</p>
<p>The IMF will lend Iceland $2.1 billion, and Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark will loan $2.5 billion to help the country re-float its currency and shore up its banking sector.</p>
<p>The Icelandic krona, or crown, has lost about 70% of its  value since <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/07/iceland-economy/" target="_blank">the  nation’s financial crisis first began</a>. The government put restrictions on currency trade as it wrestled with the crisis, however one of the stipulations of the IMF loan is that Reykjavik once again float&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/iceland-gets-11-billion-bailout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t Be Tempted By Huge Emerging Market Bond Yields</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/don%e2%80%99t-be-tempted-by-huge-emerging-market-bond-yields/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/don%e2%80%99t-be-tempted-by-huge-emerging-market-bond-yields/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Newman;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign finance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bank for Reconstruction and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereign Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=8830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Industrialized countries are dropping like flies into recession. So far, emerging markets have avoided the economic meltdown. But that is changing, says <strong>David Newman</strong>. He says investors should not be tempted by the huge bond yields on offer in countries like Argentina. In today&#8217;s climate, knowing you will get your money back is much more valuable.</p>
<p>This from The <a href="http://www.SovereignSociety.com" class="alinks_links">Sovereign Society</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I found this chart online and thought it was such a good representation of what is going on that I just had to share it with you. (Thanks to the folks at <a href="http://frigginloon.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/recession-9.gif">http://frigginloon.com/</a> )</p>
<p></p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve written about before, this is really just the beginning of the flood of bad news we&#8217;re going to continually hear about over the next few months.</p>
<p>As you&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/don%e2%80%99t-be-tempted-by-huge-emerging-market-bond-yields/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Financial Headlines Still Flash Caution</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/financial-headlines-still-flash-caution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/financial-headlines-still-flash-caution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agnes Kitzmueller;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank losses;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Investment Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general electric co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government of Singapore Investment Corp.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nordic Countries;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QVM Group LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TX Investment Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unicredit SPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vladimir putin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Feng;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qvmgroup.com/invest/?p=1031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our November 19 post, we said we are monitoring five key dimensions on ten key asset categories to gauge when, how and how much to commit the cash we raised in the summer to the markets in the future.
1. Technical Market Factors
2. Valuation Fundamentals
3. Risk Levels
4. Government Intervention Policies
5. Economic Conditions
Ten Key Asset Categories [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/financial-headlines-still-flash-caution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swiss National Bank Cut Rates 100 BPS!</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/swiss-national-bank-cut-rates-100-bps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/swiss-national-bank-cut-rates-100-bps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building Permits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HKD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Buffett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP-Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koruna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nordic Countries;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October Housing Starts;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris Hilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLN;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel drums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cook;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Review;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Swiss National Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ty Keough;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utley;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zimbabwe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=8838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Trading Theme returns&#8230;  Automakers&#8217; bailout vote today&#8230;  Not using all your arrows&#8230;  Housing Starts go back to 1959! And Now&#8230; Today&#8217;s Pfennig!</p>
<p>OK&#8230; Whew! What an awful day yesterday for the currencies&#8230; In the morning, they ere in rally mode with the euro gaining ground to well within the 1.27 handle. But then the Trading Theme set in, and those gains were wiped out. The Trading Theme was set off by the awful Housing data, which reminded everyone of the deep, dark , dangerous days ahead&#8230; I bought some euros, and watched them rise, and went off to do something else&#8230; When I returned, they had fallen&#8230; UGH! The Japanese yen, however, rallied, as is the case with the Trading Theme&#8230;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/swiss-national-bank-cut-rates-100-bps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IDM Pharma Inc.’s (IDMI) Childhood Bone Tumor Treatment Gains Positive Review, Marketing Recommendation by European Medicines Agency</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/idm-pharma-inc%e2%80%99s-idmi-childhood-bone-tumor-treatment-gains-positive-review-marketing-recommendation-by-european-medicines-agency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/idm-pharma-inc%e2%80%99s-idmi-childhood-bone-tumor-treatment-gains-positive-review-marketing-recommendation-by-european-medicines-agency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Medicines Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDM Pharma Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liechtenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osteosarcoma;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy P. Walbert;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=13893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Osteosarcoma is a childhood cancer, usually affecting the bones of children and young adults during adolescent growth spurts. Most of the tumors are found in large bones such as the femur, tibia and humerus, though the tumors can occur in any bone. Although fewer than 1,000 new cases are diagnosed in the U.S. each year, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/idm-pharma-inc%e2%80%99s-idmi-childhood-bone-tumor-treatment-gains-positive-review-marketing-recommendation-by-european-medicines-agency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IDM Pharma Inc.’s (IDMI) Childhood Bone Tumor Treatment Gains Positive Review, Marketing Recommendation by European Medicines Agency</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/idm-pharma-inc%e2%80%99s-idmi-childhood-bone-tumor-treatment-gains-positive-review-marketing-recommendation-by-european-medicines-agency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/idm-pharma-inc%e2%80%99s-idmi-childhood-bone-tumor-treatment-gains-positive-review-marketing-recommendation-by-european-medicines-agency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Medicines Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDM Pharma Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liechtenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osteosarcoma;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy P. Walbert;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=13893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Osteosarcoma is a childhood cancer, usually affecting the bones of children and young adults during adolescent growth spurts. Most of the tumors are found in large bones such as the femur, tibia and humerus, though the tumors can occur in any bone. Although fewer than 1,000 new cases are diagnosed in the U.S. each year, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/idm-pharma-inc%e2%80%99s-idmi-childhood-bone-tumor-treatment-gains-positive-review-marketing-recommendation-by-european-medicines-agency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New TARP, Stocks Cheap Enough Yet? Escaping the Global Recession, The Dububble, and More!</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-new-tarp-stocks-cheap-enough-yet-escaping-the-global-recession-the-dububble-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-new-tarp-stocks-cheap-enough-yet-escaping-the-global-recession-the-dububble-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Addison Wiggin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Dunn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Byron King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadillac CTS;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional oil output;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutschland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFM;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy investment;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[father-in-law;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hapeville;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I.O.U.S.A.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Dimon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Bowman;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Thain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oecd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil shocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate brokers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Adelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taurus;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YTD Club;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=8463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Paulson reworks financial bailout: New targets for investment… even you can apply! Markets plummet… <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/bill-bonner/" class="alinks_links">Bill Bonner</a> on when stocks will be cheap enough to buy. OECD predicts global recession… Germany admits contraction has already begun. Wall Street CEOs forecast “rapid,” “deep” U.S. recession. Joel Bowman on a peculiar hissing sound emitting from the Middle East.<br />
</p>
<p class="BodyCopy" align="left">  <strong>For an erudite debate over the Paulson doctrine,</strong> we turn to our friends at The Onion this morning: </p>
<p class="BodyCopy" align="left"><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/in_the_know_should_the_government">The Money Hole.</a> </p>
<p class="BodyCopy" align="left">It’s not any more complicated than that, is it? </p>
<p class="BodyCopy" align="left">  Indeed, <strong>Paulson and company announced a TARP switcheroo yesterday.</strong> Now the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Recovery Program (TARP) is suffering a serious case of the STD “mission creep.” </p>
<p class="BodyCopy" align="left">Instead of purchasing troubled assets from banks, the Treasury, as of this morning,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-new-tarp-stocks-cheap-enough-yet-escaping-the-global-recession-the-dububble-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today in Russian Business &#8211; Nov 13, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-russia-stocks/today-in-russian-business-nov-13-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-russia-stocks/today-in-russian-business-nov-13-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Amsterdam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grain Union;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel maker;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMK;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertamsterdam.com/2008/11/today_in_russian_business_nov_8.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moscow has delayed the introduction of higher EU timber tariffs on exports, as a <a href="http://www.moscowtimes.ru/article/600/42/372319.htm">conciliatory measure</a> ahead of tomorrow’s EU-Russia summit in Nice, which is expected to see some <a href="http://en.rian.ru/russia/20081113/118284763.html">difficult exchanges</a> and few breakthroughs.  The drop in value of the ruble has seen further losses for Russian companies in London, and a government move to re-open an old investigation into Uralkali hasn’t helped, sparking fears of a <a href="http://www.moscowtimes.ru/article/600/42/372336.htm">state asset grab</a>. Russian farmers need $1.75 billion a year in grain export subsidies to survive, according to the <a href="http://www.moscowtimes.ru/article/1009/42/372330.htm">Grain Union</a>.  State-run VTB bank has agreed a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssIndustryMaterialsUtilitiesNews/idUSLD68362420081113">$201.2 million loan</a> for steel maker TMK.  With the IMF now pledging support, will <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7720614.stm">Iceland</a> still need financial help from Russia?  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-russia-stocks/today-in-russian-business-nov-13-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorting Through The Rubble</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/sorting-through-the-rubble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/sorting-through-the-rubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Nusbaum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A View Hotel;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arni Einarsson;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[near term solution;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ny times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reykjavik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8532070.post-1136474722271621220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZckZ-8naz0/SRdCkB08aJI/AAAAAAAABpk/7ru41U2fCBw/s1600-h/house+2.jpg"><img style="299px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZckZ-8naz0/SRdCkB08aJI/AAAAAAAABpk/7ru41U2fCBw/s400/house+2.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>In my usual weekend reading routine I came across <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/world/europe/09iceland.html?_r=1&#38;scp=4&#38;sq=iceland&#38;st=cse&#38;oref=slogin">this article in the NY Times</a> profiling the plight of several Icelanders including a coffee house owner in Iceland trying to keep her business, <a href="http://www.kaffitar.is/?i=9">Kaffitar</a>, afloat.<br /><br />One problem Kaffitar is having is getting suppliers to conduct business with it. At some point in the process someone has to buy Icelandic kronas to complete the transaction and no one is willing to do that.<br /><br />Another problem is that Kaffitar borrowed money in euros for expansion. The monthly payment used to be ISK 120 million but now it is ISK 200 million after the collapse of the currency. What would a 66% increase in your mortgage do to you? This is happening to many businesses in Iceland.<br /><br />When Joellyn and I were in Reykjavik in July 2006 there was a Kaffitar a couple of doors down from where we stayed. They make a hell of a soy mocha and had great bagels and pastry.<br /><br />Reading that reminded me of <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&#38;sid=aQwIFKhLTL2Q">this article from Bloomberg</a> in October that featured an interview with Arni Einarsson who is the manager of the <a href="http://www.roomwithaview.is/index_en.php">Room With A View Hotel</a> in Reykjavik which is where we stayed when we went. It <span style="italic;">really </span>is a small country.<br /><br />The house pictured above is for sale about and is an hour east of Reykjavik in Reykholt. The seller is asking €135,000 negotiable which works out to $171,000. I'm thinking it might be available for a whole lot less. Even if this one isn't available for less many others are.<br /><br /><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZckZ-8naz0/SRdKAVKox5I/AAAAAAAABps/PpRf-GTvU1w/s1600-h/town.jpg"><img style="243px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZckZ-8naz0/SRdKAVKox5I/AAAAAAAABps/PpRf-GTvU1w/s400/town.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>The second picture is a view from the deck of the neighbors and off to the left is where I think the town is. <a href="http://www.viviun.com/AD-117789/">According to the listing</a> the town, which has 100-200 people, has a supermarket, pub and restaurant.<br /><br />I'm not sure how far it is if you need a dentist or need to get your transmission worked on--maybe over to <a href="http://www.nat.is/travelguideeng/selfoss.htm">Selfoss</a> which is 30k away or if need be Reykjavik is an hour away.<br /><br />One interesting thing, but not unusual for Iceland, is that the home heating is free. One word; geothermal.<br /><br />I'm not suggesting anyone buy a house in Iceland. The point is that like many assets all things Iceland are now much, much cheaper than they were, there seems to be no near term solution at hand but it is also true there is less risk <span style="italic;">after </span>the collapse. The Icelandic countryside will not disappear if Iceland defaults on its debt, or needs more bailout money or the krona drops a lot more. I also believe that at some point free heat from geothermal pays off for the country in attracting manufacturing to set up shop.<br /><br />This general outline applies to many other types of investments these days. Down a lot, no clarity on how low it goes, some sort of redeeming value that cannot go to zero and something to look forward to in the future.<br /><br />This is not a call to buy them with both hands but to step back and remember there is less risk in the stock market after a 40% drop. Any given stock might be a different story. If you were lucky enough to raise cash early on, be smart enough now to recognize that fear might exceed reality. If you think that is a crazy thought then I would submit that you have the wrong asset allocation which has caused you to have a big emotional reaction.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/sorting-through-the-rubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Ebbing Tide Lowers All Boats</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/an-ebbing-tide-lowers-all-boats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/an-ebbing-tide-lowers-all-boats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(GE)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fdic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QVM Group LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trichet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qvmgroup.com/invest/?p=959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty grim out there.Â  Where is the basis for current optimistic stock market views?
Markets may anticipate recovery, but how soon could that recovery be, given the depth of the problem?Â  How many more stimulus programs are needed? How many more can be paid for now or later? Are we sowing the seeds of greater disaster [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/an-ebbing-tide-lowers-all-boats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction: Credit Default Swaps Lurk Waiting For a Kill</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/more-financial-weapons-of-mass-destruction-credit-default-swaps-lurk-waiting-for-a-kill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/more-financial-weapons-of-mass-destruction-credit-default-swaps-lurk-waiting-for-a-kill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Stanczyk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gold Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abigail Moses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ambac Financial Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American International Group Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrea Cicione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armonk;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of International Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNP Paribas SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond insurance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clearing Corp.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Derivatives Research LLC;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data warehouse;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depository Trust;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTCC;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Hu;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Swaps and Derivatives Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judy Inosanto;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mbia Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitchell Sonkin;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shannon D. Harrington;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Backshall;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Information Warehouse;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walnut Creek;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wamu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Mutual Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web site Nov.;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapidtrends.com/blog/2008/11/07/more-financial-weapons-of-mass-destruction-credit-default-swaps-lurk-waiting-for-a-kill/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex&#8217;s Notes: Personally, I find it comical that anyone even goes to the DTCC for data anymore. I mean seriously, we are looking to the company responsible to ensure the proper clearing of shares of stock on the US market, who clearly is in cahoots with major brokerages allowing massive naked shorting and letting them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/more-financial-weapons-of-mass-destruction-credit-default-swaps-lurk-waiting-for-a-kill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMF Expected to Bailout Iceland, Hungary, Ukraine, is the US Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/imf-expected-to-bailout-iceland-hungary-ukraine-is-the-us-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/imf-expected-to-bailout-iceland-hungary-ukraine-is-the-us-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Stanczyk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gold Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAA US government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darryl Robert Schoon;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emelia Sithole-Matarise;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sic Wall Street;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard & Poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapidtrends.com/blog/2008/11/05/imf-expected-to-bailout-iceland-hungary-ukraine-is-the-us-next/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IMF Bailout of the US
Darryl Robert Schoon
Posted Nov 4, 2008
Economics has less to do with money than power.
Modern economics is not rocket science. Modern economics is a fraud. Metrics such as &#8220;monetary aggregates&#8221; and the &#8220;velocity of money&#8221; are merely devices meant to divert attention away from the fraud in progress.
Focusing on such metrics has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/imf-expected-to-bailout-iceland-hungary-ukraine-is-the-us-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Day After</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-day-after-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-day-after-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaney Grace;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HKD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koruna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLN;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reserve Bank Of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=7881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I want change too!  Euro leads a currency rally!  Factory Orders plunge!  Carry Trades back on the table!                                    And Now&#8230; Today&#8217;s Pfennig!<br />
Good day&#8230; And a Wonderful Wednesday to you! The day after&#8230; The day after all the election ads ended&#8230; What a beautiful day it is! Well, in January we&#8217;ll have a new president, one that had a call to &#8220;change&#8221;&#8230; I sure hope we can change&#8230; The problem is what I want changed hasn&#8217;t been on any candidate&#8217;s agenda&#8230; That&#8217;s because, as the Big Boss Frank Trotter so eloquently said the other day when I complained about the lack of talk on this subject, &#8220;They can&#8217;t get elected if they talk about that&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>The &#8220;that&#8221; is simply the national debt,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-day-after-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beggars Can Be Losers</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/beggars-can-be-losers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/beggars-can-be-losers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abdullah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high oil prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher oil prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Marx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Producing Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization Of Petroleum Exporting Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riyadh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=7695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When the president of the United States visited this region almost a year ago, the city of Dubai closed down for the entire day. Locals and expats alike jokingly refer to this event of yore as “Bush Day,” a day when they stayed home from work and watched movies as the leader of the “free world” took a Big Bus tour of the city.</p>
<p>Now, twelve months later, as W’s presidential twilight years draw to a close, another of the West’s leaders journeys to the Gulf region. Like Bush, England’s Gordon Brown is not particularly popular in the polls. But this captain from the west has more pressing issues to deal with than the restoration of his public image; he needs&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/beggars-can-be-losers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Reserve and IMF are Getting Good with Handouts.</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/federal-reserve-and-imf-are-getting-good-with-handouts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/federal-reserve-and-imf-are-getting-good-with-handouts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Crooks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank recipients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Stossel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short-term Liquidity Facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.moneyandmarkets.com/blog/currency-corner/0/0/federal-reserve-and-imf-are-getting-good-with-handouts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><br />Key News<br />•&#160;Money-Market Rates Fall After Fed Cut, Cash Infusions for Emerging Markets (Bloomberg)<br />•&#160;European Economic Confidence Plunges by Record as Financial Crisis Deepens (Bloomberg)<br />•&#160;Japan's Government Plans to Spend Almost $51 Billion to Stimulate Economy (Bloomberg)</p>
<p>Key Reports Due (WSJ): <br />8:30a.m. Initial Jobless Claims For Oct 25 Week: Expected: -3K. Previous: +15K. <br />8:30a.m. 3Q Advance GDP: Expected: -0.5%. Previous: +2.8%. <br />10:00a.m. DJ-BTMU Business Barometer For Oct 13: Previous: -0.3%. </p>
<p><br />Quotable <br />“But I'm not saying that the government should impose a litmus test. God forbid. I just want clueless people to find something else to do on Nov. 4.”</p>
<p>	&#160; 	John Stossel</p>
<p>FX Trading – Federal Reserve and IMF are Getting Good with Handouts.</p>
<p>Does the ‘establishment of temporary reciprocal currency arrangements’ mean anything to you?</p>
<p>Yeah, it kind of went by me in a blur the first time I read it. Basically, this has become one of the side shows for the Federal Reserve. They cut their benchmark lending rate yesterday by 50% and at the same time established temporary reciprocal currency arrangements (more commonly known as swap lines) with four more global central banks ... bringing the total number of arrangements between the FOMC and other central banks up to 14.</p>
<p>The recent additions are of emerging market central banks: Singapore, Brazil, South Korea and Mexico. The goal here, for the Fed, is to help fight off the systemic financial crisis that’s begun to hit hard in these smaller, developing markets.</p>
<p>What these swap lines do is increase the liquidity of US dollars and hopefully restores semi-normal money flow within these, and surrounding, economies. </p>
<p>Another measure has been taken by the International Monetary Fund. They recently struck deals with Ukraine and Iceland, and since then have also finalized business with Hungary. </p>
<p>What they have now set-up they are calling the Short-term Liquidity Facility (SLF). The main goal of SLF is to fund these pint-sized economies without question so that they can shore up their deteriorating financial positions.</p>
<p>So with roughly $30 billion granted to these four newest central bank recipients and a deadline of April 30, 2009 to get things back on track, plus the IMF’s newly announced SLF ...</p>
<p>… will these steps cure the illness or just alleviate the symptoms of ailing emerging market economies?</p>
<p>Our guess: simply alleviate the symptoms. A cure is still a long ways off.</p>
<p>Lacking in many features of strong, well-rounded economies, most of these emerging markets have put all their chips into their exports sector. They rely almost entirely on neighboring and developed economies buying up cheap goods and raw materials – these swap lines and lending facility aren’t going to compensate for that fact.</p>
<p>There are still too many problems – throughout all economies of the world – that need fixing before generous demand can return. Until then, developing economies will wallow in self-pity, smacking themselves in the forehead because they made no investment in their domestic economies but rather only on the insatiable consumption of larger foreign economies (there are of course some noted exceptions here—Brazil being one of them).</p>
<p>The way we look at it, this is something that’s only beginning. As quickly as these economies gained the backing of foreign investors in the last couple years, these same foreign investors (whether individuals or institutions) are running for cover just as fast.&#160; Thus it is no surprise the emerging market stocks have been slammed—even harder than the developing world variety.</p>
<p>&#160;<img alt="" src="http://local.content.compendiumblog.com/uploads/user/7e88b461-578b-47f3-88ec-038e212ad053/a56c87c5-8253-45b7-aa80-26c89da2fa75/103008.JPG"/></p>
<p>In witnessing the last couple months of currency trading, it’s obvious where this capital is fleeing for refuge. That’s one of the factors, and a powerful one, behind our view that the buck is entering a multi-year bull market; at the expense of most major and emerging market currencies. </p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Jack&#38;JR<br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/federal-reserve-and-imf-are-getting-good-with-handouts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the Mega-Rally Hold?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/can-the-mega-rally-hold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/can-the-mega-rally-hold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Addison Wiggin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Byron King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Committee on Foreign Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cushman & Wakefield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Amoss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovered oil reserves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy development target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fleetwood Enterprises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontier Airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goodyear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I.O.U.S.A.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Dimon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream financial  media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Persian Gulf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Kimmitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Sarnoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watson Wyatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=7495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="BodyCopy" align="left">Stocks stage huge rally, but will it hold? Key levels to watch, and some historic perspective&#8230; Libor continues to ease; famous Wall Street CEO explains why credit still isn’t flowing&#8230; John Williams on the “true cost” of the U.S. financial crisis, with charts to prove it&#8230; Byron King with an “exploding” foreign resource market&#8230;. Plus, a stinging critique of I.O.U.S.A., and one thing you must do before voting Nov. 4.</p>
<p class="BodyCopy" align="left"> <strong>The Dow logged its second best one-day point gain, 889 points, in its even more storied history yesterday:</strong> </p>
<p class="BodyCopy" align="center">
<div>
<div></div>
</div>
</p><p class="BodyCopy" align="left">Percentage wise, at 10.8%, the rally ranks sixth. The S&#38;P and Nasdaq trundled alongside the old lady like puppies. </p>
<p class="BodyCopy" align="left">After finding a new “credit crisis” low on Monday, traders on Wall Street snapped back&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/can-the-mega-rally-hold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today in Russian Business &#8211; Oct 30, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-russia-stocks/today-in-russian-business-oct-30-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-russia-stocks/today-in-russian-business-oct-30-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Amsterdam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile TeleSystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Mandelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vneshekonombank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertamsterdam.com/2008/10/today_in_russian_business_oct_21.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The financial crisis is making itself felt in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/30/russia-market-turmoil">job losses</a>.  The Kremlin is trying to limit the amount of foreign debt <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssIndustryMaterialsUtilitiesNews/idUSLT53551520081029">taken on by its oligarchs</a> in an attempt to prevent Russian companies from ending up in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/30/business/30views.html?scp=8&#38;sq=russia&#38;st=nyt">foreign hands</a>.  United Company RusAl will receive a massive <a href="http://www.moscowtimes.ru/article/600/42/372035.htm">$4.5 billion bailout fund</a> - almost half of the total loans allocated - from state-run Vneshekonombank, to help it refinance a Western loan.  The UK’s Business Secretary, Peter Mandelson, <a href="http://www.moscowtimes.ru/article/600/42/372033.htm">spoke highly</a> of Russia’s financial prospects as he reached the end of his visit to Moscow, saying that the crisis had <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5042835.ece">boosted diplomatic relations</a> between the two countries.  A share buyback for Norilsk Nickel was so oversubscribed that shareholders will only be able to sell 7% of the shares tendered - provided the <a href="http://www.moscowtimes.ru/article/600/42/372042.htm">court injunction</a> to freeze them is lifted.  The UK’s Vodafone will sign a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/30/vodafonegroup-telecoms">strategic partnership</a> with Mobile TeleSystems today.  Bakasoftware - Russia’s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/30/technology/internet/30virus.html?_r=1&#38;sq=russia&#38;st=nyt&#38;adxnnl=1&#38;oref=slogin&#38;scp=2&#38;adxnnlx=1225338833-RiPCH4YpWfqEdj7gshcfmw">internet ‘<em>scareware</em>’ scam</a>.  Russia and Iceland are to resume talks over a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSLU69347620081030">possible loan</a>.  Finnish builders are feeling Russia’s <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&#38;sid=akwmvXEImw2M">construction slump</a>.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-russia-stocks/today-in-russian-business-oct-30-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed rate cut a DUD! Fed rescues go WILD!</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/fed-rate-cut-a-dud-fed-rescues-go-wild/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/fed-rate-cut-a-dud-fed-rescues-go-wild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin D. Weiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Larson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.moneyandmarkets.com://aafb257633a98e067461e309d28e78fc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While all eyes were focused today on the  Fed's rate cut, the big news was the Fed's latest cockamamie effort to save world.
Indeed, just when you thought the insanity couldn't get crazier,  the Fed announced it's now going to funnel a massive $120 billion of U.S. funds  ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/fed-rate-cut-a-dud-fed-rescues-go-wild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Wearing The Hair Shirt For Over Two Years Hungary Is Now Helped Into The Straight Jacket</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/after-wearing-the-hair-shirt-for-over-two-years-hungary-is-now-helped-into-the-straight-jacket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/after-wearing-the-hair-shirt-for-over-two-years-hungary-is-now-helped-into-the-straight-jacket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Alvarez-Rivera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4Cast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andras Simor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne-Marie Gulde-Wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltic states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank base rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budapest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Bank Monetary Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danske Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominique  Strauss-Kahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eastern europe economy watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Flores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euroland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferenc Gyurcsány]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabór Ambros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Bajnai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungarian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary's Finance Ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary's government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bank for Reconstruction and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laszlo Andor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Central Bank Monetary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1443720106009957151.post-5947982317744017553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well we now have some of the details of the IMF package for Hungary, and interesting reading it makes. Hungary has in effect secured a 20 billion-euro ($25.5 billion) loan which is going to be sourced by three institutions: the IMF, the EU and the World Bank. The International Monetary Fund is going lend Hungary 12.5 billion euros, the European Union will provide another 6.5 billion euros, and the World Bank is chipping in with a symbolic 1 billion euros. (Really the reasoning behind the tripartite division of the loan may relate more to the pressure which it is thought might fall on IMF funding provision - which stands at about $250 billion at the present time - if more emerging market economies follow the lead of Ukraine, Hungary and Iceland. See <a href="http://globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com/2008/10/bank-bailouts-are-very-well-intended.html">this post here</a> for more details and argumentation on this whole problem).<br /><br />The forint naturally rose - to 257.05 per euro at 9:10 a.m. in Budapest - on the news, in the process getting below the psychologically important 260 mark and very near to a two-week high.<br /><br /><strong>The Analyst View</strong><br /><br /><blockquote>``The agreement is designed to restore investor confidence and alleviate the stress experienced in recent weeks in the Hungarian financial markets,'' IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn said in a statement in Washington yesterday.</blockquote><br /><br /><blockquote>“One way to look at the EU assistance to New Member States is that this is also part of the operation aimed at making sure Euroland banks don't get into trouble. The banking systems in New Member States are practically owned by foreign (mainly Euroland) banks, and if their NMS subsidiaries get into trouble, that would not be good news for the holding companies either. In the current environment that is a strong additional argument for major Euroland countries to make sure that New Member States (and their banking systems) do not get into trouble because of the liquidity crunch."<br />István Zsoldos, Goldman Sachs, London</blockquote><br /><br /><blockquote>``The aid package won't make Hungary immune to the real economy effects of the financial crisis..........Where the IMF appears with its strict conditions, the requirement of consolidation inevitably leads to real economy and social consequences.'' <br />Laszlo Andor, European Bank For Reconstruction and Development Board Member</blockquote><br /><br /><blockquote>``A sharp economic slowdown, driven by declining foreign- currency credit flows to the private sector, tight fiscal conditions and weak external demand is unlikely to be avoided'' <br />Eszter Gargyan, Citigroup Inc, Budapest</blockquote><br /><br /><blockquote>“We expect the EU and the IMF to announce additional rescue packages for other Central and Eastern European economies in the coming days and weeks. Top of the list are the most imbalanced countries in the region - the Baltic States, Romania and Bulgaria."<br />Lars Christensen, Danske Bank, Copenhagen</blockquote><br /><br /><blockquote>“All in all, the crisis seems to have been averted and even though it is no doubt a major shame that Hungary got to this situation, the authorities managed well in the rough waters, far better than Iceland (major policy mistakes in particular by the CB), Ukraine (political fragmentation still a major problem, currency peg had to be abandoned after failed interventions) and Romania where politicians remain ignorant even now, after the problems are more than evident. Bulgaria also does not seem to be prepared, though the currency board, the fiscal reserves and the significant budget surplus at least provide more cushion."<br />Gábor Ambrus, 4Cast, London</blockquote><br /><br />Of course, none of this comes free. In effect the IMF is providing Hungary with a 17-month stand-by agreement, and just the fee for making the stand-by available will be 0.25% of the total quantity per annum, according to information provided by Central Bank (NBH) Governor András Simor in a press conference this morning (Wednesday). The rescue package is available up to the end of March 2010, with 3-5-year repayment period and an interest rate of 5-6% per annum (fixed).<br /><br />And then, of course, there are the conditions.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Conditions For The Loan </strong><br /><br />The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has effectively imposed two conditions on Hungary in exchange for the package, according to Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány addressing a press conference yesterday (Tuesday).<br /><br />1) The 2009 budget needs to be framed in such a way that even under a pessimistic scenario spending targets will not exceed the actual funds available (thus a new budget deficit target has been set for 2009 at 2.6% of GDP, under the assumption that Hungary will experience a 1% contraction in GDP - see more below - while the primary balance on the budget should produce a surplus of 1.8% of GDP. This is of course very strong stuff indeed in view of the looming recession);<br /><br />2) Hungary should not embark on measures that could have a negative influence on the revenue side of the budget (e.g. extensive tax cuts).<br /><br /><br />Hungary's Finance Ministry has accordingly lowered its 2009 public sector deficit target down to 2.6% of gross domestic product, from the already previously reduced goal of 2.9%. In fact the Hungarian cabinet had recently rewritten the 2009 budget draft (which in any event still needed to go before parliament) due to the pressure on Hungary's financial system, lowering the deficit goal to 2.9% of GDP from 3.2%).  Really all this does seem incredibly ritualistic, since I for one am hardly convinced that coming down from a 3.2% deficit to a 2.9% one is going to be all that earth shattering in terms of the economic results produced, although it will of course provide some nice red meat to feed to those ever so hungry external investors, who, if they think the fiscal deficit is at this point is the main issue in Hungary, far from being the shrewd and caluculating economic actors assumed by rational agent theory  simply have no idea of what is going on at this point in time.<br /><br />The fiscal problem arose much earlier in the day and Hungary's government has been struggling to put it right, operating a deficit reducing policy since the summer of 2006, and had managed to cut the shortfall to 5 percent of gross domestic product last year from 9.2 percent in 2006. The 2007 target has also already been reduced to 3.4% of GDP from 3.8%, so I can hardly imagine what positive macro economic benefits people expect to see from turning the screw even more on an economy which is already reeling under the extent to which the screw has already been turned.<br /><br />The main problem facing Hungary right now, apart from its very large external funding requirement, is really the fact that the civil population have become addicted to taking out their debt obligations in foreign exchange - largely Swiss Francs - and the flow of these is now drying up as the banks get scared about the downgrades they can get from any write-downs they may have to do. So the what the Hungarian economy needs now more than anything else is external support to ease the economy off the external borrowing steroids which have been being pumped into the household sector, and it is not clear to me how the IMF package is going to help with this. At least at this point it isn't.<br /><br /><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SQjD_ewKVXI/AAAAAAAALNs/sFKd0j-7kgU/s1600-h/hungary+fx+personal+loans.png"><img style="202px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SQjD_ewKVXI/AAAAAAAALNs/sFKd0j-7kgU/s320/hungary+fx+personal+loans.png" border="0" /></a><br /><br />One way forward which many are considering right now across Eastern Europe is early euro adoption. The Hungarian government and the central bank have now pledged to meet euro- adoption requirements for the deficit, inflation and national debt by next year. Hungary still doesn't  have a target date for the switchover to the euro, due to the earlier deficit overruns and ongoing inflation issues, but given that we are now likely to see sustained GDP contractions, deficit reductions and price deflation rather than inflation, I doubt Hungary will continue to have difficulty meeting existing EU/ECB  criteria in the future. The issue is rather going to be, what sort of shape will the Eurozone itself be in when Hungary finally does get the opportunity to officially present its application form?<br /><br /><strong>A PainFul Process</strong><br /><br />Naturally all these cuts and withdrawals of bank funding will have substantial consequences for the real economy and it is not without significance that Gyurcsány also stated yesterday that, in his opinion, the foremost challenge Hungary must now tackle is how to avoid mass employment layoffs, as corporates are cut back or suspend production in the face of the developing recession both within and without of Hungary's frontiers. He described what was currently happening in Hungary as “the gravest economic and financial crisis of the past 80 years", and for a country which has obviously suffered so much that is really saying something. The sad part is that I find it hard to disagree with him.<br /><br />Gyurcsány also said Hungary should brace itself for a European and global environment where combating recession, rather than achieving growth, has become the watchword. “Hence neither will the Hungarian economy grow," he said, noting that the 2009 Budget has been drawn up under the assumption of a  1% GDP contraction during the coming year.  Actually even this forecast appears to be optimistic, and Gordon Bajnai, Minister for Development and Economy, pointed out that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) had suggested "pencilling-in" a 2.5% GDP fall for 2009. This idea was obviously put forward with the idea of making a "worst case scenario" assumption on which there would have been no backsliding (thus getting all the bad news out of the way at once), but again unfortunately, the worst case scenario also appears to be a highly probable one at this point, and while really we should avoid getting into the game of bandying about numbers just for the sake of bandying them about, I personally have pencilled in a drop of between 3 and 5 percent in Hungarian GDP for 2009, since, among other issues not really being discussed at present, I am also expecting a very nasty shock to hit German GDP on the rebound from all the crises which we are seeing unfold in one country after another across Eastern Europe.<br /><br />Obviously the IMF do not spell out the details of just how Hungary can make the sort of budget cuts which are now going to be required of it, but there is no doubt that they will be painful. Among the proposals which are being floated around  are the scrapping of the 13th month wage civil servants receive and a halving in the 13th month pension.<br /><br /><br />Many observers have been surprised by the size of the loan, but as Lars Christensen (Danske Bank) notes, the size does gives us some indication of how the IMF see the financial crisis as being  significantly greater in Central and Eastern Europe than most market participants have been willing to accept until now. Anne-Marie Gulde-Wolf, IMF's Division Chief at the Monetary and Financial Systems Department and Elena Flores, European Commission Director, both stressed - at a press conference organised by Hungary's Finance Ministry - that the EUR 20 bn facility was a credit line and Hungary would not necessarily be drawing on  it if market and macroeconomic conditions were to improve or normalise (although since there is not much likelihood of this happening in the near term, it is not unreasonable to assume they will need to draw on a significant part of the loan). What they said in effect was that they wanted to give the markets a "strong sedative" at this point, one which was strong enough to make people think twice before acting.<br /><br />Flores also stressed that the EU Commission had attached three conditions to Hungary's receiving the credit line. Hungary must:<br /><br />- tame and cut expenditure;<br />- continue fiscal reform measures;<br />- continue structural reforms.<br /><br />The 20 billion euro figure considerably increases the 17 billion euros of existing reserves available to the  NBH for covering external payment obligations which for the next 12 months are estimated at around 32 billion euros. This 32 billion is, howvere,  another worst case scenario, assuming that the foreign owners of the Hungarian banking sector completely cut access to financing (not totally improbable, or at the very least new financing is going to be greatly reduced) and that import levels remain unchanged despite an potentially contraction of exports (much less likely).<br /><br />This line of thinking is reinforced by András Simor's statement today that the  financial package is a credit line which if drawn on will boost Hungary's foreign currency reserves. Simor underlined that if Hungary draws the full amount available the bank's foreign currency reserves would more than double. Simor also stressed that any decision to use the credit would need to be taken by the government. In order to put the size of the loan into some sort of perspective Simor said it is: - twice as large as the stock of Hungarian government securities held by non-residents (currently around HUF 3,000 bn); - about five times as large as the country's external debt maturing next year; - about one third of Hungary's total government debt.<br /><br /><strong>Why Do I Call This A Straight Jacket?</strong><br /><br />Basically Hungary is about to take some extremely tough medicine, medicine which in the short term will see GDP actually <strong>shrinking</strong>. To put this in perspective, I think we need to remember that Hungary is a comparatively poor emerging economy, with per capita incomes way below the EU average. Thus these cuts will really be felt, especially any cut backs on pensions or health facilities, since remember Hungary is already a rapidly ageing society, with a comparatively short male life expectancy (ie poor health among older males), and all these cuts will not make this problem any better.<br /><br /><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SMGWuv8uPDI/AAAAAAAAHwk/xbHavnEdOW8/s1600-h/hungary+qoq.jpg"><img style="center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SMGWuv8uPDI/AAAAAAAAHwk/xbHavnEdOW8/s320/hungary+qoq.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><br />Instead of simply repeating what I have already written time and time again on this blog, I will quote extensively from 4Cast analyst Gabór Ambros, at this point, since I essentially agree with the points he makes:<br /><blockquote>“At the same time, there is no doubt that to ensure Hungary's long-term survival a major diet is needed (this is in fact true to every emerging country which experiences the same problem)."<br /><br />“The thirst for debt financing, domestic or local, has to be drastically reduced and not just for a period of a year but for longer, given that credit markets are not going to be the same in the foreseeable future as they had been before the world 'subprime' become known outside the circles of the debt securitization market."<br /><br />“This implies not only a reduction of the public debt but also the substantial reduction of the deficit of the current account which implies a major diet for consumers (how much is needed exactly is highly uncertain, given that the massive errors and omissions row on the C/A statistics render the C/A figures rather meaningless)."<br /><br />“While the increased credit costs and the restricted credit availability will drive demand down, a key tool to rebalance the economy is the exchange rate. Hungary needs a week forint to ensure the sustainability of financing and in this anti inflationary global environment the NBH should in our view be ready to accept a slightly slower paced disinflation to allow the financing thirst to reduce and ensure the long term sustainability of growth."<br />Gábor Ambrus, 4Cast, London </blockquote><br /><br />So basically, and in a few words, domestic private consumption - which has already been very, very weak following the "austerity package" of 2006 (what I am calling the hair shirt) - is now going into full speed reverse gear, as all those personal consumption swiss franc mortgage loans come to a dead stop. Government spending is also going to go backwards, as the deficit is cut and cut, over a GDP which is itself reducing. And exports - the third platform of any economy - is also set to go full speed reverse, as Russia and the other EU countries all shoot off into what is probably going to be quiet an important recession.<br /><br /><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SMGNFd3onyI/AAAAAAAAHwU/DliXzqYB3G0/s1600-h/hungary+household+consumption.jpg"><img style="center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SMGNFd3onyI/AAAAAAAAHwU/DliXzqYB3G0/s320/hungary+household+consumption.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><br />As Gabór Ambrus says, Hungarian consumers are about to go on quite a drastic "diet", and the only way forward is through exports, which means a weaker forint (god, how I have been tirelessly arguing this on this blog since late 2006), which means all those swissie mortgages have to go (ditto), which means some of these banks will need to take a substantial haircut on the write-downs (good job the EU is on-board then). And on and on, or down and down we go. Of course, with population in decline anyway, when exactly will we see GDP growth again in Hungary????<br /><br /><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SLpXyq_OdjI/AAAAAAAAHns/y10iwDoh054/s1600-h/hungary+population.jpg"><img style="center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SLpXyq_OdjI/AAAAAAAAHns/y10iwDoh054/s320/hungary+population.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><br /><strong>Whither Monetary Policy?</strong><br /><br />Obviously one last point which is worth making on this most hectic of hectic days, concerns monetary policy. As we know the central bank base rate is currently at the ridiculously high level of 11.5%. But does this now make sense, and in particular if you want a weaker forint? Well some comments from central bank governor András Simor earlier today seem to suggest that changes may well be on the way.<br /><br /><blockquote>“In this new situation monetary policy makers will need to rethink which way to go from here," Simor said.</blockquote><br /><br />The Central Bank Monetary Council, Simor noted in his press conference, is faced with a “new macroeconomic situation" in Hungary due to the changes that have taken place in the world economy. The rate-setting body he assured his audience will carefully analyse the processes and draw its conclusions in the coming one to two months. That is, you have been warned.<br /><br />Well, I think that will do for now, but don't any of you dare complain that you haven't had the priviledge of living in "interesting times". Fascinating, I would say, especially for those of you with sufficient interest to learn from them.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/after-wearing-the-hair-shirt-for-over-two-years-hungary-is-now-helped-into-the-straight-jacket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bank Bailouts Are Very Well Intended, But Where Is All The Money Going To Come From?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/german-stocks/the-bank-bailouts-are-very-well-intended-but-where-is-all-the-money-going-to-come-from/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/german-stocks/the-bank-bailouts-are-very-well-intended-but-where-is-all-the-money-going-to-come-from/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander Tsirigotis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel's administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austrian Federal Financing Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austrian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank recapitalisations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belarus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNP Paribas SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Heinz Daube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank Ag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bundesbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominique  Strauss-Kahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecuador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe Merrill Lynch & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frankfurt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypo Real Estate Holding AG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bank for Reconstruction and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kazakhstan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuart Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivek Tawadey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529397808101838812.post-5244321639083397303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As every woman who has ever had dealings with a man knows only too well, it is a lot easier for people to make promises than it is for them to keep them. And when Europe's leaders met in Paris on the 12 October, a lot of fine promises (which were all, surely, very well intentioned) were made. The reality of having to live up to them, however, is turning out, as might only have been expected, to be much more complicated.<br /><br />Basically, the kernel of the plan which is now being operationalised seems to have been thrashed out in Washington on 11 October, when key G7 leaders met with Dominique Strauss Kahn of the IMF, and it was decided to try and erect two great firewalls (corta fuegos) - at least as far as Europe is concerned. One of these was to be co-ordinated by the EU governments, and the other by the IMF, who were to act in the East. Both these parties essentially agreed to guarantee the banking systems in the countries for which they took responsibility, so the action, in a sense, moved from the banks (which are now, more or less "safe") to the governments and the IMF (who is ultimately backed by cash from governments), and it is the "safety" of these institutions which is likely to be more or less tested by the markets, with the first trial of strength taking place right now in Iceland.<br /><br />So the big question now is, do these various institutions have the resources to back up their guarantees, should the need arise?<br /><br /><strong>Problem Selling Bonds</strong><br /><br /><br />In this context the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fd782ada-a451-11dd-8104-000077b07658.html">Financial Times had a very interesting article yesterday</a> about the fact that the Austrian government had decided to cancel a bond auction.<br /><br /><blockquote>Austria, one of Europe’s stronger economies, cancelled a bond auction on Monday in the latest sign that European governments are facing increasing problems raising debt in the deepening credit crisis.</blockquote>According to the FT article the difficulties Austria, which has a triple A credit rating, is facing only serves to highlights the extent of the deterioration in the sovereign bond market, where benchmark indicators of credit risk such as the iTraxx index hit fresh record spreads yesterday.<br /><br />Austria now is the third European country to have cancelled a bond offering in the last few weeks - in the Autrian case the markets are getting more and more nervous over the exposure of some of its key banks (Erste, Raffeison) to the mounting disaster over in Eastern Europe - both Hungary and Ukraine received IMF loans this week (see below) and they certainly won't be the last.<br /><br />Austria seems to have dropped its plans for a bond launch next week due to the size of the premiums (spreads) investors seemed likely to demand, although the Austrian Federal Financing Agency did not give any explanation for the decision.<br /><br />Spain, which alos currently has a triple A rating, and Belgium have both cancelled bond offerings in the past month because of the market turbulence, with investors again demanding much higher interest rates than debt managers had bargained for.<br /><br />So really many European governments are now facing similar problems to those their banks faced earlier, they can get finance, but only at rates which they consider to be punitively high (remember, the interest has to be paid for from somewhere, in the present recessionary climate from cuts in services more than probably, since, remember, if we look over at Eastern Europe, investors are very likely to "punish" those governments who try to go down the easy road, and run large fiscal deficits over any length of time).<br /><br /><blockquote>Market conditions have steadily deteriorated in recent days with the best gauge to credit sentiment, the iTraxx investment grade index, which measures the cost to protect bonds against default in Europe, widening to more than 180 basis points, or a cost of €180,000 to insure €10m of debt over five years, on Monday.</blockquote>This is a steep increase since only as recently as Monday of last week, when the index closed at 142 base points. Also the cost of default protection on European companies has risen to record highs this week on investor concern that the global economic slowdown will curb company profits. The Markit iTraxx Europe index of 125 companies with investment-grade ratings fell 3.5 basis points yesterday to 166.5, after hitting a record high on Monday.<br /><br />The FT cites analyst warnings that the there is now a huge quantity of government debt building up in the pipeline, and the government bonds due to be issued in the fourth quarter and early next year will only add to the problems some countries are facing, and particularly those countries like Greece and Italy who already carrying large amounts of debt that needs to be refinanced or rolled over.<br /><br />It has been estimated that European government bond issuance will rise to record levels of more than €1,000bn in 2009 – 30 per cent higher than 2008 – as governments seek to stimulate their economies and pay for bank recapitalisations.<br /><br /><blockquote>The eurozone countries will raise €925bn ($1,200bn) in 2009, according to Barclays Capital. The UK, which is expected to increase its bond issuance from the current €137.5bn in the 2008-09 financial year, will take the figure above €1,000bn.</blockquote><br /><br />Italy, and Greece, both with a debt-to-GDP ratios of over 100 percent, are certainly the most exposed to continuing difficulties in the credit markets, (with analysts forecasting that Italy alone will need to raise €220bn in 2009). At the present time the <a href="http://italyeconomicinfo.blogspot.com/2008/10/colonialism-goes-into-reverse-gear-as.html">Libyans are lending the Italian government a helping hand</a> (and <a href="http://italyeconomicinfo.blogspot.com/2008/10/unicredit-stays-in-news.html">here</a>) in struggling forward, but even oil rich Libya doesn't have the money to fund the long term needs of the Italian banking, health and pension systems.<br /><br /><strong>IMF Have Only $250 Billion</strong><br /><br /><br />On the other hand <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&#38;sid=auEPqDcSNysg&#38;refer=latin_america">Bloomberg had an article yesterday</a> on the growing pressure on the IMF's somewhat limited resources, as one country after another in Central and Eastern Europe joins the "consultation queue" in the hope of getting a bail out.<br /><br />Bloomberg report that the cost of default protection on bonds sold by 11 emerging-market nations has now either approached or surpassed distress levels, raising the very immediate likelihood that the International Monetary Fund's ability to bailout countries may soon start to be put to the test.<br /><br />Credit-default swaps on eight countries including Pakistan, Argentina and Russia have now passed the 1,000 basis points mark, the level which is normally considered to signify "distress", according to data provided by CMA Datavision. Funding one basis point on a contract protecting $10 million of debt from default for five years is equivalent to $1,000 a year.<br /><br /><blockquote>``The resources of the IMF may not be sufficient for wider bailouts if needed,'' said Vivek Tawadey, head of credit strategy at BNP Paribas SA in London. ``If it can't raise the money, some of the more distressed emerging markets could end up defaulting.'' </blockquote>Ukraine, Hungary, and Iceland have already received IMF loans, while the fund is currently in "consultation" talks with Belarus, Turkey, Latvia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria and Pakistan, at the very least.<br /><br />According to Simon Johnson, former chief economist at the fund the IMF only has up to $250 billion it can currently lend (as quoted in the Financial Times yesterday).<br /><br />Credit-default swaps on Pakistan currently cost 4,412 basis points. Contracts on Argentina are at 3,650 basis points, Ukraine at 2,850, Venezuela at 2,400 and Ecuador costs 2,072. Default protection on Russia, Indonesia and Kazakhstan also costs more than 1,000 basis points, while Iceland costs 921, Latvia 850 and Vietnam 837. Contracts on Turkey cost 725 basis points.<br /><br /><br />The IMF agreed at the weekend to lend Ukraine $16.5 billion for 24 months and stated yesterday that they would contribute $12.5 billion towards a $25.5 billion loan for Hungary (with the other participants being the EU and the World Bank. Iceland got a $2 billion loan on Oct. 24 and Belarus has asked for at least $2 billion. Just how many more loans are now in the pipeline, and if the IMF does start to see its funds stretched, just who exactly is going to step up to the plate and fork the necessary money out? The sheer fact that they only put part of the cash for the Hungarian loan, and that the World Bank had to come on board with a symbolic $1 billion shows they are already aware that the problem may arise.<br /><br /><strong>Update</strong><br /><br />Well just after writing this, <a href="http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto102820082216558928">I see from reading the FT</a> that Gordon Brown got there just before me. Beaten by a short head!<br /><br /><blockquote>Gordon Brown on Tuesday spearheaded calls for a multi-billion pound "bail-out fund" to prevent the global crisis spreading to more countries, and warned of the need to stabilise economies "across eastern Europe".....<br /><br />The prime minister on Tuesday urged the oil-rich Gulf states and China to provide "substantial" funding to the International Monetary Fund, before flying to France for talks on an increase to the European Union's bail-out fund.  The government is keen to emphasise the link between global action and domestic voters' interests, as well as portraying Mr Brown as a world leader.<br /><br />The prime minister said it was "in every nation's interests and the interests of hard-working families in our country and other countries that financial contagion does not spread". While he did not rule out the UK making a contribution, he insisted the "biggest part can be played by the countries that have got the biggest [balance of payments] surpluses".<br /><br />The IMF's $250bn (£158bn) bail-out fund "may not be enough" to prevent the crisis destabilising more countries, Mr Brown said. His spokesman added the UK was "looking at a figure in the hundreds of billions of dollars" for the IMF. Mr Brown called for "action on this new fund immediately".</blockquote><br /><br />Also, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&#38;sid=apemzTQl4ilg&#38;refer=germany">another story in Bloomberg</a> gives us a further glimpse of how the EU governments are planning to do all that financing. The German government, it seems, is going to print IOUs (sorry, bonds) and give them directly to the banks. That is, they are not going to auction bonds and give the proceeds, they are simply giving the paper, and presumeably paying a coupon (or interest). Oh yes, and the bonds will not be sellable, since this would, of course, damage the yield curve via the supply and demand process, but they will count as debt, which means that the German government is being very naieve here (assuming the report is accurate) since of course the rise in the debt may well mean a breach of the 2011 balanced-books commitment, and falling back on this will almost inevitably have an impact on the extra implied risk investors will be looking to get paid for holding the bonds.<br /><br /><blockquote>Germany plans to finance part of its 500 billion euro ($636 billion) bank rescue package by issuing bonds to banks in exchange for new preferred stock, according to Finance Agency head Carl Heinz Daube. <br /><br />``The banks will not be allowed to sell the injected government bonds,'' Daube said in an interview in Tokyo today. ``So far there's obviously not a huge demand for any rescue measures, but this might change in the coming weeks.'' <br /><br />Germany's rescue plan, approved by lawmakers on Oct. 17, amounts to about 20 percent of the gross domestic product of Europe's biggest economy. Chancellor Angela Merkel's administration pledged 80 billion euros to recapitalize distressed banks, with the rest allocated to cover loan guarantees and losses. <br /><br />....Hypo Real Estate Holding AG, the Munich-based lender that's already had a 50 billion euro bailout, today asked the Deutsche Bundesbank for 15 billion euros to cover short-term liquidity needs. ....Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank AG may also need 8.9 billion euros of new capital, more than any bank in Europe, Merrill Lynch &#38; Co. analysts Stuart Graham and Alexander Tsirigotis wrote on Oct. 20. <br /><br />The bailout plan is still being discussed in Berlin and more information will probably be released at the end of this week, Daube said. <br /><br />Germany may meet additional funding needs for its bank rescue by selling six-month bills before examining options for borrowing using longer-term securities, Daube said. The government plans to offer between 212 billion euros and 215 billion euros of debt through its 2009 program, about the same as the 213 billion euros scheduled for this year. <br /><br />The debt-for-equity swap will probably have ``next to no effect'' on the country's yield curve because the notes offered to banks won't trade in the so-called secondary market, he said. The yield curve plots the rates of government bonds according to their maturities, and increases indicate higher borrowing costs. <br /><br />``The government deficit of course will increase, the outstanding volume of bonds will increase as well,'' Daube said. ``The number of outstanding bonds available in the secondary market will stay exactly the same.'' </blockquote><br /><br />Gentlemen, we are out of our depth here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/german-stocks/the-bank-bailouts-are-very-well-intended-but-where-is-all-the-money-going-to-come-from/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conflicting Evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/conflicting-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/conflicting-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 04:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank-to-bank lending rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNP Paribas SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Suisse AG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cristina Kirchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWS Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Shepherdson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEAGlobal.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bank for Reconstruction and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamic Republic of Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.P. Morgan Private Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Atkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hancock Financial Services Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSCI World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QVM Group LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R. Jeremy Grantham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert J. Froehlich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Chartered Bank Plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuart Schweitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tao Dong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Steinberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivek Tawadey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren E. Buffett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Cheney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qvmgroup.com/invest/?p=921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact is that today&#8217;s stock markets were extraordinary in their strength. Emerging markets (proxy EEM) up about 20% and the S&#38;P 500 (proxy SPY) up about 11%.
There are important positive facts to consider:

for the past couple of weeks SPY has been trading sideways &#8212; that&#8217;s good.


SPY went up 11% today &#8212; that&#8217;s good (although [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/conflicting-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed to Cut Rates, U.S. Recession Appears Likely</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/fed-to-cut-rates-us-recession-appears-likely/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/fed-to-cut-rates-us-recession-appears-likely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben S. Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Patalon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Office for National Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank counterparts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Open Market Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoffrey Dennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governing Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Hatzius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Claude Trichet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Naroff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ryding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nabCapital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naroff Economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Parsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDQ Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=7275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Federal Reserve is likely to cut rates tomorrow (Wednesday), possibly in conjunction with central bank counterparts in Europe, as fears of a global recession have intensified. However, the Fed has little room to maneuver as its benchmark Federal Funds rate is already at 2% and analysts remain skeptical that reducing it any further keep the United States from sliding into a prolonged recession.</p>
<p>The next meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee is scheduled for tomorrow Wednesday Oct. 29. There is no doubt that growth will be the central issue of the committee’s discussion, as fears of a global recession are intensifying alongside deteriorating economic data.</p>
<p>The British Office for National Statistics’ said Friday that, after a flat second quarter,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/fed-to-cut-rates-us-recession-appears-likely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kookburger Time!  A rant it is!</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/kookburger-time-a-rant-it-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/kookburger-time-a-rant-it-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Crooks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beloved metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Bankers Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frederic Bastiat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Fletcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mel Gibson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P. Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Petersburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US falls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.moneyandmarkets.com/blog/currency-corner/0/0/kookburger-time--a-rant-it-is-</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Key News<br />•&#160;Iceland's central bank unexpectedly raised the benchmark interest rate to 18 percent, the highest in at least seven years, after the island reached an aid agreement with the International Monetary Fund. (Bloomberg)<br />•&#160;Interbank cost of borrowing funds fell across the board on Tuesday, according to the latest daily fixing from the British Bankers' Association, as the recent turmoil on financial markets eased. (Reuters)<br />•&#160;Key Reports Due (WSJ):<br />7:45a.m. ICSC/Goldman Sachs Chain Index For Oct 25: Previous: -1.6%. <br />8:55a.m. Redbook Retail Sales Index For Oct 25: Previous: -1.1%. <br />9:00a.m. Aug S&#38;P/Case Shiller Home Price Index: Previous: -17.9%. <br />10:00a.m. Oct Conference Board Consumer Confidence: Expected: 52. Previous: 59.8. <br />10:00a.m. Oct Richmond Fed Mfg Survey: Previous: -18. <br />5:00p.m. ABC/Wash Post Consumer Conf For Oct 26 Previous: 50. <br />Two-day FOMC meeting begins. </p>
<p>Quotable <br />"A good conspiracy is unprovable. I mean, if you can prove it, it means they screwed up somewhere along the line.”<br />	Jerry Fletcher (played by Mel Gibson), Conspiracy Theory </p>
<p>FX Trading – Kookburger Time!&#160; A rant it is! <br />----------<br />Editors Note: Warning to gold lovers, conspiracy nuts, and US haters.&#160; This rant you may want to avoid.&#160; <br />----------<br />The conspiracy crowd is working overtime these days. </p>
<p>Many “deep thinkers” among the gold crowd still spout conspiracy stuff on a regular basis to help explain why their beloved metal is not now sitting at least $2,000 an ounce.&#160; Could it really be that each morning Fed Chairman Bernanke, Treasury Secretary Paulson and, of course, V.P. Dick Cheney wake from their slumber and huddle in the safe room to discuss how they can manipulate the gold market.&#160; We tend to think they have bigger fish to fry.&#160; </p>
<p>What’s odd about the gold conspiracy theory crowd is that gold’s price action, and minor role in the system, is very rationally explainable (granted the explanation may be wrong) on standard economic terms.&#160; But gold guys all seem to have the secret handshake and “know” it’s manipulated.&#160; Odd indeed!&#160; Does it make one feel better to say you lost money because of some nebulous “manipulation” you can’t really define?&#160; Guess so.&#160; And isn’t it disconcerting when the “manipulators” push gold up for no particular reason and a believer makes money?&#160; We don’t get it. But then again, Philistines we are.&#160; </p>
<p>But it’s getting better than that out there.&#160; Over the past couple of days we’ve been made privy to some whoppers in the making.&#160; If you don’t already know, let us clue you in on a couple: The Amero is on the way.&#160; This conspiracy uncovered says the US will soon toss away its world reserve currency status in order to distribute new currency that has Mexican and Canadian politicians’ pictures on the front.&#160; Aren’t American politicians on our money enough already?&#160; It’s a loony idea indeed.&#160; </p>
<p>And a new conspiracy uncovered, and emailed to us, stars on You-Tube.&#160; A gentleman there has revealed a well heeled crowd in the Middle East will use its vast wealth to take over Russia of all places; after it crushes the US economy in its spare time.&#160; Hmmm…wouldn’t Spain be a lot nicer given those nasty winters in St. Petersburg?&#160; We’ve heard real estate prices are looking good in Barcelona.&#160;&#160;&#160; </p>
<p>Do powerful people do all they can to advance their interest and power in the world?&#160; Absolutely!&#160; Are markets “manipulated” by pools of capital at times?&#160; No doubt.&#160; But, this doesn’t automatically equal conspiracy.&#160; At least we don’t think so.</p>
<p>“There is only one difference between a bad economist and a good one: the bad economist confines himself to the visible effect; the good economist takes into account both the effect that can be seen and those effects that must be foreseen,” wrote Frederic Bastiat.</p>
<p>We don’t think Bastiat was talking conspiracy theory here.&#160; We do think he was talking about all the stuff underneath the surface of an advanced and complex, yet fragile, system of decisions by millions of players with all types of varying interests that make up what we call an economy.&#160; </p>
<p>Just because we can’t discern what’s going on below the surface, it doesn’t mean it isn’t at least as important, or more important, than the stuff we see going on above.&#160; And because we can’t always apply our Newtonian cause and effect to what we see above, it doesn’t mean we should create conspiracy theories as explanation.&#160; </p>
<p>I’ve recently talked about the doom and gloom crowd getting it exactly right with their broken clocks, but most got it exactly wrong too as they believed US dollar doom was the upshot of the story.&#160; What we found interesting as we followed the dollar doom and gloomers along this long path was the degree to which price action seemly proved them right, hiking their egos along the way, yet the reality bite now shows maybe they were simply fooled by randomness, and shouldn’t have chalked up their rightness to their rather pedestrian intelligence. </p>
<p>Nassim Taleb said it well in Fooled by Randomness:&#160; </p>
<p>“By some viciousness of the structure of randomness, a profitable person like John [trader of rather pedestrian intelligence], someone who is a pure loser in the long run and correspondingly unfit for survival, presents a high degree of eligibility in the short run and has the propensity to multiply his genes.&#160; Recall the hormonal effect on posture and its signaling effect to other potential mates.&#160; His success (or pseudo-success owing to its fragility) will show in his features as a beacon.&#160; An innocent potential mate will be fooled not thinking (unconditionally) that he has superior genetic makeup, until the following rare event.&#160; Solon seems to have gotten the point; but try to explain the problem to a naïve business Dawarinist—or your rich neighbor across the street.”</p>
<p>Let me put this yet another way.&#160; Many so-called “currency experts” got it right for many years because of the trend and carved out guru-like status along the way.&#160; The root of their argument was the US was, and still is, all bad.&#160; The US fundamentals were terrible.&#160; The US is the root of all global financial evil.&#160; Thus, despite this “bounce” of 23%+ in the US dollar, to hell in hand basket it will still go.&#160; This crowd has no clue as to what is and has gone on below the surface for the most part, yet glib they still are.&#160; </p>
<p>I’m sure the US haters will wine and complain about our defense of the US financial system—so be it.&#160; But what if all of you who bashed the US for its “dependency” for money flow to support its deficits got it completely wrong?&#160; It would explain why many of you find it so confusing the dollar could dare to rally. </p>
<p>What if the US was the lynch-pin for the global financial system and therefore charged with finding a proper home for all those forex reserves built up by dictatorial countries who were very happy not to reinvest in their own people lest they create wealth that could come back to challenge their rule?&#160; What if they just kept dumping all this stuff into the bad old US where their assets were most efficiently processed and protected by the rule of law, which isn’t quite available at home?&#160; What if the US current account is what we have always said it was, a representation of US dollar credit greasing the wheels of all global asset markets for the betterment of the this thing called globalization (which helps explain why the last two times we got what the economists and whiners wanted, an improvement in the current account, which coincided with stock market crash in 1987 and 2000)?&#160; What will happen to all those resources re-funneled by the US financial system to strengthen export sectors the world over when said export demand by the bad old US falls?&#160;&#160; </p>
<p>In short, blame the US financial system if you wish.&#160; But be careful about your diagnoses on the dollar.&#160; If all this efficient recycling of resources which sparked a massive run-up in global growth by creating massive dollar-based credits for others around the globe to grow is now heading home and said export models built on credit come crashing down, this little dollar bounce could easily morph into a multi-year bull market; which is what we expect after applying our pedestrian-like intelligence to the stuff we can and can’t see.&#160;&#160;&#160; </p>
<p>And of course you can just imagine the plethora of conspiracy theories hatched when the world realizes the good old greenback’s world reserve currency status is poised to soar in a way it never has before.&#160; This will make the Plunge Protection Team look like child’s play.&#160; Stay tuned.&#160; </p>
<p>Is the dollar finally correcting?&#160; We’ve been playing for it near-term and getting steamrolled by it.&#160; But this morning, it’s getting whacked a bit as stocks are actually bidding higher pre-open and did well in Europe. Hopes of a US rate cut tomorrow from the Fed seem to be lifting spirits, and some calmness in the interbank market suggesting the credit may be normalizing a bit.&#160; </p>
<p>The high yielders, which have been whacked so hard recently, are flying today…</p>
<p>AUDUSD 90-min: Just above near-term resistance.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://local.content.compendiumblog.com/uploads/user/7e88b461-578b-47f3-88ec-038e212ad053/a56c87c5-8253-45b7-aa80-26c89da2fa75/102808-1.JPG"/>&#160;</p>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<p>Given the dollar index chart is looking parabolic, any correction that does materialize could be very powerful.</p>
<p>&#160;<img alt="" src="http://local.content.compendiumblog.com/uploads/user/7e88b461-578b-47f3-88ec-038e212ad053/a56c87c5-8253-45b7-aa80-26c89da2fa75/102808-2.JPG"/></p>
<p>…and by the shape of the open interest and mix of overwhelming bears to bulls in the euro currency futures, maybe Mr. Market is due to shake off some dollar bulls…<br />&#160;<img alt="" src="http://local.content.compendiumblog.com/uploads/user/7e88b461-578b-47f3-88ec-038e212ad053/a56c87c5-8253-45b7-aa80-26c89da2fa75/102808-3.JPG"/><br />Regards,<br />Jack&#38;JR</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/financial/kookburger-time-a-rant-it-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday Linkfest</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/tuesday-linkfest-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/tuesday-linkfest-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Brodrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AngloGold Ashanti Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltic states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belarus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deepwater oil rigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equities Pare Losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Fields Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harmony Gold Mining Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal
prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Schering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization Of Petroleum Exporting Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Falls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vladimir putin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.moneyandmarkets.com/blog/red-hot-energy-and-gold/0/0/tuesday-linkfest</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been talking recently about
how the credit crunch may slow project development in both energy and
gold. Here are two examples ...<br /><br /><a class="summheadline" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&#38;sid=aookyGgmOAts&#38;refer=news">Credit Crisis May Block, Delay 20% of Deepwater Rigs, Slow Petrobras Boom </a>
As many as 20 of the 100 deepwater oil rigs on order worldwide may be
delayed or canceled as loan availability erodes, possibly slowing
developments including the biggest petroleum discovery in the Americas
in three decades.<br /><br /><a class="summheadline" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601116&#38;sid=au9ukZzPuuGo&#38;refer=africa">AngloGold, Gold Fields, Harmony May Spend Less as The Metal's Price Falls </a>
AngloGold Ashanti Ltd., Gold Fields Ltd., and Harmony Gold Mining Co.,
Africa's biggest gold producers, may review spending plans after metal
prices tumbled and credit availability tightened. <br /><br />And here are some more stories of interest ...<br /><br /><a class="summheadline" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&#38;sid=ajcDCMutGfUg&#38;refer=canada">Gold Rises as Equities Pare Losses, U.S. Dollar's Rally Stalls Versus Yen </a>
Gold rose in Asia, erasing earlier losses, as equities pared losses and
the dollar's rally against the euro stalled ahead of reports that may
show U.S. consumer confidence dropped.<br /><br /><a class="summheadline" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601095&#38;sid=a_iqc4c3XXpM&#38;refer=east_europe">Putin Urges China to Join With Russian in Moving Away From U.S. Dollar Use </a>
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin urged China to move away from the
dollar, saying a global economy based on the U.S. currency has
``serious problems.'' <br /><br /> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/3269669/IMF-may-need-to-print-money-as-crisis-spreads.html">IMF may need to "print money" as crisis spreads</a><br />The
Fund is already close to committing a quarter of its $200bn reserve
chest, with a loans to Iceland ($2bn), Ukraine ($16.5bn), and talks
underway with Pakistan ($14.5bn), Hungary ($10bn), as well as Belarus
and Serbia. Neil Schering, emerging market strategist at Capital
Economics, said the IMF's work in the great arc of countries from the
Baltic states to Turkey is only just beginning. <br /><br /><a class="summheadline" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&#38;sid=aI_u9JIQgm9k&#38;refer=latin_america">Oil Rises From 17-Month Low as U.S. Stock Futures, Asian Equities Rebound </a>
Crude oil rose from a 17-month low as stocks in Europe and Asia
rebounded and OPEC ministers said the group may meet again before
December, raising speculation of deeper cuts in production. <br /><br /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122514183698973463.html">GM May Get $5 Billion Loan for Chrysler Deal</a><br />The
Department of Energy is working to release $5 billion in loans to
General Motors Corp. ... The funds would come from a pool of $25
billion in low-interest loans approved by Congress to help Detroit
retool its plants to meet new fuel-efficiency standards. It's not clear
how quickly the money could be made available or whether it would come
with strings attached.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/tuesday-linkfest-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four Ways to Sidestep the Damage Wall Street’s Big Money  Movers are Inflicting on Main Street</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/four-ways-to-sidestep-the-damage-wall-street%e2%80%99s-big-money-movers-are-inflicting-on-main-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/four-ways-to-sidestep-the-damage-wall-street%e2%80%99s-big-money-movers-are-inflicting-on-main-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Fitz-Gerald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Century Capital Preservation Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of International Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citadel Investment Group LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CME Group Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-border bank loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damage Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flighty retail  investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reykjavik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereign-debt-insurance using 
credit default swaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Poors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cahill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street's Armani Army]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=2893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Keith Fitz-Gerald
    Investment Director
  Money Morning/The Money Map Report
As the worst financial crisis in recorded market history  rocks Wall Street, millions of investors on Main Street...

Money Morning is here to help investors profit hands...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/four-ways-to-sidestep-the-damage-wall-street%e2%80%99s-big-money-movers-are-inflicting-on-main-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed to Cut Rates at Next FOMC Meeting as U.S. Recession  Appears Likely</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/fed-to-cut-rates-at-next-fomc-meeting-as-us-recession-appears-likely/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/fed-to-cut-rates-at-next-fomc-meeting-as-us-recession-appears-likely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Money Morning</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben S. Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Patalon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Office for National Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank counterparts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Open Market Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoffrey Dennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governing Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Claude Trichet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Naroff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ryding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nabCapital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naroff Economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Parsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDQ Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=2897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jason Simpkins
    Associate  Editor
    Money  Morning
The U.S. Federal Reserve is likely to cut rates tomorrow  (Wednesday), possibly in conjunction with central bank counterparts in Europe,  as...

Money Morning is here to help investors profit h...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/fed-to-cut-rates-at-next-fomc-meeting-as-us-recession-appears-likely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europe Faces Day of Reckoning in Emerging Market Debt</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/europe-faces-day-of-reckoning-in-emerging-market-debt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/europe-faces-day-of-reckoning-in-emerging-market-debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Denning</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Denning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy-is contracting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Andre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kris Sayce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[less bank lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetary and financial systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization Of Petroleum Exporting Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gottliebsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soccer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swarm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.businessspectator.com.au]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=7143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You know it&#8217;s a real financial crisis when capitalists are being told what to do by a bunch of socialists and communists. But these are the times we live in. Ironic and moronic. </p>
<p>Investors will be utterly confused today about what to fear most. First, you had the nightmare open in New York on Friday. The futures markets were limit down and closed briefly. By the time order was restored to electronic markets, the Dow opened down 6%.</p>
<p>The Dow rallied-if you can call it that-to close down &#8220;just&#8221; 3.6% on the day. A that point, you could safely say the market was &#8216;pricing in&#8217; the fear of a global recession, and just what that would mean for corporate earnings. Not&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/europe-faces-day-of-reckoning-in-emerging-market-debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why ‘Explosive’ US Debt Will Take Down The Dollar</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/why-%e2%80%98explosive%e2%80%99-us-debt-will-take-down-the-dollar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/why-%e2%80%98explosive%e2%80%99-us-debt-will-take-down-the-dollar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justice Litle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buenos Aires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cristina Fernández de  Kirchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Herald Tribune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nestor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Presses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taipan Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=7093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Argentina - where Contrarian Profits is based - could be heading for its <a title="Open a new browser window to find out more" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&#38;sid=aWUxGEcW3M94&#38;refer=latin_america" target="_blank">second debt default in less than a decade</a>.  <strong>Justice Litle </strong>says the US is also burdened by a ballooning national debt pile. And no-one really knows how it will be paid back. That&#8217;s why the current US dollar rally cannot last much longer.</p>
<p>This from <a href="http://www.taipanpublishing.com" class="alinks_links">Taipan</a> Daily:</p>
<blockquote><p>Whither the dollar and gold? To answer that long-awaited  inquiry – which will take some time to cover in full – let’s start by getting a  handle on “exploding debt dynamics.” Cartoonish as it sounds, it’s a real term  that IMF economists use.</p>
<p>If, like me, the phrase gives you visions of Wile E. Coyote  blowing himself up with a box of ACME brand&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/why-%e2%80%98explosive%e2%80%99-us-debt-will-take-down-the-dollar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recession Fears Hit Home as World Markets Plummet and U.S. Economy Contracts</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/recession-fears-hit-home-as-world-markets-plummet-and-us-economy-contracts-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/recession-fears-hit-home-as-world-markets-plummet-and-us-economy-contracts-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CEO Blogger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Office for National Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channel Capital Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Perino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Bank of Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoffrey Dennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Insight Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Archer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Naroff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSCI Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSCI World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naroff Economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq Composite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McTeer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shrewsbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widespread bank recapitalization measures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=7136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Fear of a global recession is quickly becoming reality as world markets have lost $10 trillion in value in the month of October and the U.S. economy almost certainly contracted in the third quarter. </p>
<p>“The growing reality is that this is not just a slowdown,  but a true recession,” Joel Naroff, president and chief economist of <a>Naroff Economic Advisors</a> told <strong><em>Money  Morning</em></strong> Friday. “Europe and Asia can no longer deny U.S. problems are  also hitting there.”</p>
<p><a>Friday was the 79th  anniversary of 1929’s “Black Thursday,”</a> when U.S. stocks were decimated at the start of the Great Depression. And while U.S. markets weren’t quite as hard hit on that date in 2008 as they were in 1929, the overall global effect was chilling.</p>
<p>This October is&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/recession-fears-hit-home-as-world-markets-plummet-and-us-economy-contracts-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hungary Agrees To An IMF Loan</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/hungary-agrees-to-an-imf-loan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/hungary-agrees-to-an-imf-loan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Alvarez-Rivera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christoph Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact car segment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominique  Strauss-Kahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eastern europe economy watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign bank governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungarian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary's government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary's Government Debt Management Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libyan government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Blum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The National Bank of Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unicredit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vienna]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1443720106009957151.post-7526256813297226819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hungary has reached agreement with both the International Monetary Fund and the European Union on a broad economic rescue package, including substantial financing, to stabilize the Hungarian economy which besides being shaken by the global financial crisis now faces serious population-ageing related macro economic and structural problems moving forward.<br /><br /><blockquote>"A substantial financing package in support of these strong policies will be<br />announced when the program is finalized in the next few days," IMF Managing<br />Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn said in a statement that did not indicate the<br />size of the package. </blockquote><br />Hungary (which is a member of the European Union but not the Eurozone), has been in talks with the IMF since early October in an attempt to sort out a package which will do something to restore confidence in falling markets.<br /><br />Hungary's government and the central bank have taken a series of measures to shore up the currency and financial markets, and the central bank hiked interest rates by 300 basis points on Wednesday (to 11.5 percent) and offered support to local residents who wanted to transfer their debt obligations from Swiss francs to Forint.<br /><br /><br /><br />Hungary's problem is that it relies heavily on foreign investors buying its bonds while its banks face difficulty in securing foreign currency financing as liquidity dries up in international and local money markets. The crisis has caused credit markets to malfunction so severely that many emerging market economies cannot quickly access the capital they need. The problem has been most acute in dollar funding markets as Western banks hoard money and refuse to lend to each other.<br /><br />While we still lack details of the package, we are being assured by Hungarian government sources that it will be "of convincing size and force."<br /><br /><blockquote>"The agreement contains standby access to resources, which will significantly reduce Hungary's exposure to foreign market financing," according to one anonymous source. </blockquote><br /><blockquote>With Hungary's commitment to strengthened economic policies, Strauss-Kahn said he expected Hungarian banks and other financial institutions would be able to start lending. "The policies Hungary envisages justify an exceptional level of access to fund resources," Strauss-Kahn added.</blockquote>We also learned yestreday that the IMF had agreed in principle to a $16.5 billion standby loan deal with Ukraine and that on Friday it agreed to a $2.1 billion deal with Iceland.<br /><br />Portfolio Hungary <a href="http://www.portfolio.hu/en/cikkek.tdp?cCheck=1&#38;k=2&#38;i=16119">points to the following sentence in the IMF statement</a> - "The policies Hungary envisages justify an exceptional level of access to Fund resources" - and read it as suggesting that the IMF financial support to Hungary could be several times the value of the country's IMF quota. This see this assumption as backed up by the fact that the USD 16.5 bn facility to Ukraine is eight times as large as Ukraine's quota.<br /><br /><br />While Martin Blum, analyst at UniCredit in Vienna, say that - at least in terms of the information released so far - the package sounds positive in that the package is designed to ensure the external private sector remains on board and:<br /><br /><blockquote>“The IMF/Hungary package could prove significant to the extent that it seems it will explicitly include EU and some EU govt funding. This is clearly positive for the rest of the EU27 including Romania and Bulgaria. Although big underlying problems remain, we'd remain flat EUR/HUF and Hu, Ro and Bg CDS into this weeks likely Hungary IMF financing announcement. In short, the big question now is the scale of EU/EU govt funding." </blockquote><br /><br />This all looks very interesting, and I am absolutely convinced that if Hungary is to continue to apply a rigourous fiscal policy in its own right, then some sort of external injection of demand (read cash) will be essential to keep the patient ticking over while it is on the life support system. I simply worry that with the problem now extending right across Eastern Europe, and the fiscal issues mounting at home for the foreign bank governments in the wake of their own massive "bailouts" then that there may be a danger of overstretch here, and that we could see the fical positions (read treasuries) in some of the theoretically funding countries coming under attack next as they reveal the size of their own fiscal on-costs. Remember, basically for ageing population commitment reasons, the EU countries had all agreed to try and balance budgets before 2011 and this agreement is now likely to get lost in the rubbish bin of history.<br /><br />Also, and since Martin Blum comes himself from the much troubled Italian bank Unicredit, maybe we also need to be including the Libyan government in any multilateral support system, since their government <a href="http://italyeconomicinfo.blogspot.com/2008/10/unicredit-stays-in-news.html">now seems to be the second largest shareholder in Unicredit</a>, and the bank seems to be maintaining its Tier I capital ratio only thanks to Libyan support.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Difficulty Selling Bonds</strong><br /><br />News of the Hungarian and Ukraine loans does not seem to have done much to unblock liquidity at this point, since Hungary's Government Debt Management Agency (ÁKK) have had to withdraw HUF 40 bn worth of discount T-bills (the auction was cancelled) which they offered for sale at a liquidity auction this morning, since they received no more than HUF 5.09 billion worth of bids.  Last week the issuer was forced to do the same with a 6-m T-bill and a 3-yr bond auction. <br /><br />The ÁKK scheduled a 3-m and a 12-m discount T-bill auction for this week, offering HUF 40 bn of the instruments on both occasions.  Hungary's BUX Index slid 11 percent on opening this morning too, the seventh straight day of loses.<br /><br />The National Bank of Hungary (NBH) has also announced it bought HUF 50 billion worth of government bonds at an auction today, the full amount on offer, according to a staement released on its website. The yields were extraordinarily high.  The NBH purchased HUF 20 billion 2009/F bonds at an average yield of 14.05%, HUF 20 billion 2010/C bonds at 14.21% and HUF 10 billion 2011/C bonds at an average yield of 13.77%.  At the last auction held on 17 October, the average yield on HUF 25 billion  2011/C bonds came in at 12.06%. <br /><br /><br />Also Ukraine's hryvnia fell <a href="http://ukraineeconomy.blogspot.com/2008/10/hryvnia-falls-to-record-low-on-monday.html">to near a record low against the dollar this morning</a> as the $16.5 billion International Monetary Fund loan failed to restore confidence in the country's ability to weather the global financial crisis. The hryvnia slid 1.3 percent to 5.9500 per dollar by 9:48 a.m. in Kiev, from 5.8750 on Oct. 24. It traded as low as 6.0812 last week, according to Bloomberg this is the hryvnia's weakest level since at least 1994, when they began tracking Ukraine's currency. <br /><br />Christoph Rosenberg, Senior Regional Representative for Central Europe and the Baltics (who I respect as a really serious economist) is quoted by Reuters this morning as saying “It's a really good policy package." We'd just better hope it is, since we have no details yet. And Chris, if you are listening out there somewhere, any package which has as its kernal a tight fiscal stance simply won't work due to the depth of the recession it will produce. The Hungarian government need to put their own books in order (to keep the investment community happy), but they will need support from the EU or elsewhere to be able to increase spending in some way or another, otherwise..... weak exports (external european environment), plunging domestic consumption (no forex loans) and cut-backs in public spending only add up to one thing: a substantial deflationary recession, and more financial crises as we move forward. Hungary needs the forint down and spending in some part of the economy UP - a mix of greenfield investment and public spending in support of this would perhaps be the best option, and a cheaper forint would make wages in the export sector more competitive at a stroke.<br /><br />News like the following are what we need, and the investors are going to need incentives in this environment:<br /><br /><blockquote>Daimler has on Monday signed an agreement with Hungary's government to invest around EUR 800 million in a new plant in Hungary that will manufacture over 100,000 compact cars annually from 2012, and create up to 2,500 jobs.  “Mercedes-Benz is building the plant in order to create additional production capacity in the compact car segment, where the model range will be expanded from two to four vehicles. The plant contributes to the profitability of the product portfolio extension," Daimler said in a statement.</blockquote>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-europe/hungary-agrees-to-an-imf-loan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ukraine and Hungary To Receive IMF Loans, While Belarus Joins the Line</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/ukraine-and-hungary-to-receive-imf-loans-while-belarus-joins-the-line/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/ukraine-and-hungary-to-receive-imf-loans-while-belarus-joins-the-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexei Kudrin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azerbaijan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belarus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christoph Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact car segment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominique  Strauss-Kahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Easy Solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[external finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign bank governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fund mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungarian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary's government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary's Government Debt Management Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interfax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libyan government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Blum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Statistics Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil-product exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The National Bank of Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unicredit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vienna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viktor Yushchenko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yulia Tymoshenko]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-188752446515464976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: Barcelona<br /><br /><br />Hungary announced on Sunday that it had  reached agreement with both the International Monetary Fund and the European Union on a broad economic rescue package, which will include substantial financing, in a bid to stabilize a Hungarian economy which has been both shaken by the global financial crisis and faces  long term macro economic and structural problems which <a href="http://hungaryeconomywatch.blogspot.com/2008/10/hungary-is-headed-for-substantial.html">make any easy solution to the situation hard to expect</a>.<br /><br /><blockquote>"A substantial financing package in support of these strong policies will be announced when the program is finalized in the next few days," IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn said in a statement that did not indicate the size of the package. </blockquote><br /><br />Hungary announced the loan at more or less the same time as Ukraine received a USD16.5bn loan from the IMF. Under normal circumstances both these moves would be good news for Central and East European equity markets assets. This was not the case on this occassion, however, and Hungary's stock markets fell more than 10% on opening yesterday, suggesting that either investors are not convinced the packages will be sufficient, or that they fear there is more to come.<!--more--><br /><br />Hungary (which is a member of the European Union but not the Eurozone), had been in talks with the IMF since early October trying to sort out some kind of package which would restore confidence in the country's falling equity and struggling bond  markets. The Hungarian government and the central bank had taken a series of measures to shore up the currency and financial markets, and <a href="http://hungaryeconomywatch.blogspot.com/2008/10/panic-strikes-hungarian-authorities-as.html">the central bank hiked interest rates by 300 basis points only last Wednesday</a> (to 11.5 percent), in addition to <a href="http://hungaryeconomywatch.blogspot.com/2008/10/and-so-it-ends-hungarys-government.html">offering support to local residents who wanted to transfer their debt obligations from Swiss francs to Forint</a>.<br /><br /><strong>Ukraine Loan Agreed</strong><br /><br />The International Monetary Fund also reached agreement with Ukraine on a $16.5 billion loan to help the country confront the ongoing financial and economic crisis. IMF managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn said on Sunday that agreement had been reached between the IMF staff mission to Ukraine and the government, although the agreement still needs to be formally ratified by the IMF board, while some members of the Ukraine government itself <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSLR56637020081027">scarely seem to be convinced of the urgent need to adopt the package</a> (and <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSLS8495420081028">here</a>).<br /><br /><blockquote>An aide to Ukraine's president accused Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko on Monday of putting a big IMF credit at risk by linking quick approval of financial legislation with the country's long-running political upheaval......Tymoshenko and her supporters last week blocked discussion of the financial package for four days in order to prevent inclusion in it of any funding for disputed early elections, called by Yushchenko for next month.<br /><br /><br />Ukraine's prime minister and the head of the IMF called on parliament to pass legislation quickly to underpin a loan deal and described political stability as a key part of the process, the government said on Tuesday. The government issued the statement ahead of a scheduled sitting of parliament, blockaded for a week by protesting deputies, to consider a package of financial measures.<br /><br />Consultations to forge a package were proceeding in parliament, which has a long history of fractious behaviour. It was uncertain debate would go ahead as scheduled. Ukraine remained gripped by its latest bout of political turmoil after President Viktor Yushchenko dissolved parliament last month and called a snap election. Tymoshenko opposes the election and her supporters disrupted debate last week to prevent any bid to finance the poll.</blockquote><br /><br />Even in the Ukraine case investors seemed pretty unphased, and the hryvnia sank to a record low yesterday, forcing the central bank to abandon the "corridor" (or band if you prefer) it had previously maintained in an attempt to control its movements. Ukraine's stock market plunged a further four percent and credit default swaps, an indication of risk that Ukraine could default on debts, rose to 2,600 basis points, up from 300 in August.<br /><br />The 24-month stand-by loan will be conditional on parliamentary approval of legislation to support the country's banks. Ukraine will also need to balance its budget and address the current-account deficit problem, according to a separate statement from the Ukrainecentral bank. Obviously we all hope that the loan will provide a framework within which it will be possible for the country to increase financial stability and rebuild confidence among investors, although there does seem to be <a href="http://ukraineeconomy.blogspot.com/2008/10/ukraine-wobbles-as-financial-ground.html">a long hard road to go down here</a>.<br /><br />Really there is a very severe credit-crunch-type (sudden stop) crisis raging in Ukraine (and across Eastern Europe more generally by the look of it) at the present time, and the macroeconomic consequences are hard to forsee, although quite a serious recession does seem imminent in the Ukraine case. <br /><br />The IMF's Ukraine package is actually pretty large if we take into account that IMFs total funds available for global distribution at the present time  only run to about USD220bn - and there are undoubtedly going to be more customers. The package is similar in size to the one Turkey got in 2002 after the collapse of the Turkish economic and financial system. This would seem to be  a clear indication that the IMF sees the risks in the Ukraine as extremely high. Furthermore, the fact that the IMF has acted  so rapidly (relative to the time it took with Turkey in 2001/02)  offers a clear indication that they fear a domino effect across central and eastern Europe wherby a collapse in one country automatically leads to a collapse in another one. Unfortunately, it is just such a process that we seem to be seeing right now.<br /><br />A further factor to worry about is that the IMF will now effectively have to take over responsibility for economic policy in the Ukraine, especially given the size of the loan. But given the level of political uncertainty and instability which exists in the country there is a serious risk that the IMF will be unable to implement the desired reforms, and even more to the point, given the deep structural nature of Ukraine's longer term demographic demise, there are reasonable doubts that even were they able to introduced these reforms they would have the desired effect. In which case the IMF is in above its head, and the resulting damage to its credibility may impede subsequent rescue efforts, in countries with similar problems, further on down the line. Since a key component in the IMFs ability to see off financial trouble in a given instance depends on its credibility, it is important that this is carefully guarded, and maybe the Ukraine is not the best place to put all that carefully built confidence back at risk again.<br /><br />Bottom line, this is not a pretty picture, nor is there an especially  pleasant outlook.<br /><br /><strong>Belarus Negotiating Loan</strong><br /><br />Belarus also made public last week that they have requested a loan from the IMF.  The amount of the loan has yet to be determined, but  Interfax reported they had applied for a $2 billion loan and may also seek funds from central banks and commercial banks in other countries. <br /><br /><br /><blockquote>``The Belarusian economy and its access to external finance,'' have been hurt by the credit squeeze, IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn said in its Belarus statement. ``At the same time, changing conditions in trade have negatively affected the country's balance of payments. A Fund mission will begin discussions with the authorities in the next few days.'' </blockquote><br /><br />Russia has also pledged to lend Belarus $2 billion, granting half the loan this year and half in 2009, according to a statement from Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin.  Belarus's foreign currency and gold reserves fell 12 percent to $4.94 billion in September, according to the National Statistics Committee. <br /><br />Belarus is likely to face a growing budget deficit because of decreasing prices for its oil-product exports to Europe, at the same time as it will be much more difficult to raise funds from selling state assets, and slowing demand in Russia for Belarusian consumer goods will crimp exports. EU countries also account for more than half of Belarus exports, so the rising recession threat across the EU won't help either.<br /><br />Belarus' current-account deficit widened to $986 million in the second quarter from $424 million in the first three months of the year, according to the National Bank of the Republic of Belarus, while the economy expanded 10.4 percent in the first half of the year, the second fastest rate in the CIS, after Azerbaijan.<br /><br />Belarus has a Ba2 rating from Moody's Investors Service, two levels below investment grade, while the Belarus ruble has declined 1.8 percent against the dollar in the past year. <br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>Hard To Say What Happens Next In Hungary</strong><br /><br />Hungary's most immediate and pressing problem is that it relies heavily on foreign investors buying its bonds while its banks face difficulty in securing foreign currency financing as liquidity dries up in international and local money markets. The crisis has caused credit markets generally to malfunction so severely that many emerging market economies are having real difficulty accessing the capital they so badly need. <br /><br />While we still lack details on theHungarian  package, we are being assured by Hungarian government sources that it will be "of convincing size and force."<br /><br /><blockquote>"The agreement contains standby access to resources, which will significantly reduce Hungary's exposure to foreign market financing," according to one anonymous source. </blockquote><br /><blockquote>With Hungary's commitment to strengthened economic policies, Strauss-Kahn said he expected Hungarian banks and other financial institutions would be able to start lending. "The policies Hungary envisages justify an exceptional level of access to fund resources," Strauss-Kahn added.</blockquote>We also learned yestreday that the IMF had agreed in principle to a $16.5 billion standby loan deal with Ukraine and that on Friday it agreed to a $2.1 billion deal with Iceland.<br /><br />Portfolio Hungary <a href="http://www.portfolio.hu/en/cikkek.tdp?cCheck=1&#38;k=2&#38;i=16119">points to the following sentence in the IMF statement</a> - "The policies Hungary envisages justify an exceptional level of access to Fund resources" - and read it as suggesting that the IMF financial support to Hungary could be several times the value of the country's IMF quota. This see this assumption as backed up by the fact that the USD 16.5 bn facility to Ukraine is eight times as large as Ukraine's quota.<br /><br /><br />While Martin Blum, analyst at UniCredit in Vienna, say that - at least in terms of the information released so far - the package sounds positive in that the package is designed to ensure the external private sector remains on board and:<br /><br /><blockquote>“The IMF/Hungary package could prove significant to the extent that it seems it will explicitly include EU and some EU govt funding. This is clearly positive for the rest of the EU27 including Romania and Bulgaria. Although big underlying problems remain, we'd remain flat EUR/HUF and Hu, Ro and Bg CDS into this weeks likely Hungary IMF financing announcement. In short, the big question now is the scale of EU/EU govt funding." </blockquote><br /><br />This all looks very interesting, although I am absolutely convinced that if Hungary is to continue to apply a rigourous fiscal policy in its own right, then some sort of external injection of demand (read cash) will be essential to keep the patient ticking over while it is on the life support system. I simply worry that with this problem now extending right across Eastern Europe, and the fiscal issues mounting at home for the foreign bank governments in the wake of their own massive "bailouts", then there may be a danger of overstretch here, and that we could see the fiscal positions (read treasuries) in some of the theoretically funding countries coming under attack next as they reveal the size of their own fiscal on-costs from all the "rescuing" that is going on. Remember, basically for ageing population commitment reasons, the EU countries had previously all agreed to try and balance their budgets before 2011 and this agreement is now most definitely about to get lost in the already overflowing rubbish bin of EU Stability and Growth Pact history.<br /><br />Also, and since Martin Blum comes himself from the much troubled Italian bank Unicredit, maybe we also need to be including the Libyan government in any multilateral support system, since their government <a href="http://italyeconomicinfo.blogspot.com/2008/10/unicredit-stays-in-news.html">now seems to be the second largest shareholder in Unicredit</a>, and the bank seems to be maintaining its Tier I capital ratio only thanks to Libyan support.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Difficulty Selling Bonds</strong><br /><br />News of the Hungarian and Ukraine loans does not seem to have done much to unblock liquidity in the affected countries at this point, since Hungary's Government Debt Management Agency (ÁKK)  had to withdraw HUF 40 bn worth of discount T-bills (the auction was cancelled) which they offered for sale at a liquidity auction yesterday, after they received less than HUF 5.09 billion worth of bids. Last week they were forced to do the same with a 6-m T-bill and a 3-yr bond auction.<br /><br />The National Bank of Hungary (NBH) similarly had to announce that it had bought HUF 50 billion worth of government bonds at auction yesterday, the full amount on offer. And the yields paid were extraordinarily high. The NBH purchased HUF 20 billion 2009/F bonds at an average yield of 14.05%, HUF 20 billion 2010/C bonds at 14.21% and HUF 10 billion 2011/C bonds at an average yield of 13.77%. At the last auction held on 17 October, the average yield on HUF 25 billion 2011/C bonds came in at 12.06%.<br /><br /><br />Christoph Rosenberg, Senior Regional Representative for Central Europe and the Baltics (who I respect as a really serious economist) was quoted by Reuters yesterday as saying “It's a really good policy package." We'd just better hope it is, since we have no details yet. And Chris, if you are listening out there somewhere, any package which has as its kernal a tight fiscal stance (and this alone) simply won't work due to the depth of the recession it will produce. The Hungarian government need to put their own books in order (to keep the investment community happy), so fiscal cutbacks at home a