<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stock Market News &#38; Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks &#187; Health Insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.straightstocks.com/tag/health-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.straightstocks.com</link>
	<description>Leading Stock Market News, Opinions and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:20:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Capitalism is alive and well</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/capitalism-is-alive-and-well/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/capitalism-is-alive-and-well/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Snyder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car  loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everett;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports-related retailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TFN Strategic Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zumiez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=21110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pBaltimore – (a href="http://www.todaysfinancialnews.com" target="_blank"TFN/a): Hallelujah, the markets work! You have no idea how happy I was this morning when I opened the Wall Street Journal and found an article detailing Goldman Sachs shareholder anger at the recent bonus payouts./p
pNow, I don’t care who makes what. That’s between bosses and their worker bees. But I do get a little peeved when Uncle Sam tries to tell some worker he can’t get paid per his contract./p
pBefore you go shouting about how Washington saved Wall Street and therefore we, as taxpayers, get a say over pay, let me ask you this. Does your mortgage company tell you what color to paint little Johnnie’s room? Does your car loan provider tell you how fast to#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/capitalism-is-alive-and-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Aetna Inc., UnitedHealth Group Inc., WellPoint Inc., Assurant Inc. and Cigna Corp. &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-aetna-inc-unitedhealth-group-inc-wellpoint-inc-assurant-inc-and-cigna-corp-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-aetna-inc-unitedhealth-group-inc-wellpoint-inc-assurant-inc-and-cigna-corp-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assurant Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigna Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurer;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last December]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitedhealth Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellpoint Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/27482/Zacks+Analyst+Blog+Highlights%3A+Aetna+Inc.%2C+UnitedHealth+Group+Inc.%2C+WellPoint+Inc.%2C+Assurant+Inc.+and+Cigna+Corp.+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><strong>For Immediate Release</strong></p>
<p align="left">Chicago, IL &#8211; November 20, 2009 &#8211; Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: <strong>Aetna Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">AET</a>), <strong>UnitedHealth Group Inc. </strong>(<a href="void(0)">UNH</a>), <strong>WellPoint Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">WLP</a>), <strong>Assurant Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">AIZ</a>) and <strong>Cigna Corp. </strong>(<a href="void(0)">CI</a>).</p>
<p align="left">Get the most recent insight from Zacks Equity Research with the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513</a></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Here are highlights from Thursday&#8217;s Analyst Blog: </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Aetna Axes Jobs</strong></p>
<p align="left">In a bid to become more efficient, the health insurer <strong>Aetna Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">AET</a>) announced on Wednesday its intention to shed a total of 1,250 jobs or about 3.5% of its total workforce by the first quarter of 2010. Management intends to do so in two phases, by slashing 625 jobs now and the remaining early next year.</p>
<p align="left">The company expects to record after-tax restructuring charges of $40 million in fourth quarter 2009. Last December, the company cut 1,000 jobs, which was 3% of its total workforce. The company plans to slash majority of the jobs at its headquarters in Connecticut.</p>
<p align="left">Aetna with a total head count of 35,500 is eliminating jobs to cope with the difficult economic environment and potential impact that the health care reform might cast on its health insurance business. Elimination of excess workforce will help streamline the business by optimizing staffing level, thereby maintaining efficiency.</p>
<p align="left">During the third quarter of 2009, Aetna earned $326.2 million, or 73 cents per share. That represents an increase from $277.3 million, or 58 cents per share, in the same quarter last year. Membership has slumped throughout the health insurance sector as employers have cut jobs, reducing the number of people covered by employer-sponsored plans.</p>
<p align="left">Aetna rivals <strong>UnitedHealth Group Inc. </strong>(<a href="void(0)">UNH</a>) and <strong>WellPoint Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">WLP</a>) both recently saw enrollment declines in the third quarter. Last week, Assurant Health, a division of <strong>Assurant Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">AIZ</a>) announced that it has slashed 94 jobs. Earlier during the year, peers <strong>Cigna Corp. </strong>(<a href="void(0)">CI</a>) cut 1,100 jobs and Wellpoint Inc. eliminated nearly 1,500 jobs.</p>
<p align="left">Want more from Zacks Equity Research? Subscribe to the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks Equity Research</strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.</p>
<p align="left">Continuous coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.</p>
<p align="left">Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517</a></p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks </strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.</p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/zacksresearch">http://twitter.com/zacksresearch</a></p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a></p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.</p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />
Mark Vickery<br />
Web Content Editor<br />
312-265-9380<br />
Visit: <a href="www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a></p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left"> </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-aetna-inc-unitedhealth-group-inc-wellpoint-inc-assurant-inc-and-cigna-corp-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aetna Axes Jobs &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/aetna-axes-jobs-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/aetna-axes-jobs-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assurant Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigna Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurer;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last December]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitedhealth Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellpoint Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/27444/Aetna+Axes+Jobs+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
In a bid to become more efficient, the health insurer <strong>Aetna Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AET">AET</a>) announced on Wednesday its intention to shed a total of 1,250 jobs or about 3.5% of its total workforce by the first quarter of 2010. Management intends to do so in two phases, by slashing 625 jobs now and the remaining early next year. <br />
<br />
The company expects to record after-tax restructuring charges of $40 million in fourth quarter 2009. Last December, the company cut 1,000 jobs, which was 3% of its total workforce. The company plans to slash majority of the jobs at its headquarters in Connecticut . <br />
<br />
Aetna with a total head count of 35,500 is eliminating jobs to cope with the difficult economic environment and potential impact that the health care reform might cast on its health insurance business. Elimination of excess workforce will help streamline the business by optimizing staffing level, thereby maintaining efficiency. <br />
<br />
During the third quarter of 2009, Aetna earned $326.2 million, or 73 cents per share. That represents an increase from $277.3 million, or 58 cents per share, in the same quarter last year. Membership has slumped through out the health insurance sector as employers have cut jobs, reducing the number of people covered by employer-sponsored plans. <br />
<br />
Aetna rivals <strong>UnitedHealth Group Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/UNH">UNH</a>) and <strong>WellPoint Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/WLP">WLP</a>) both recently saw enrollment declines in the third quarter. Last week, Assurant Health, a division of <strong>Assurant Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AIZ">AIZ</a>) announced that it has slashed 94 jobs. Earlier during the year, peers <strong>Cigna Corp</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CI">CI</a>) cut 1,100 jobs and Wellpoint Inc. eliminated nearly 1,500 jobs.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CI">Read the full analyst report on "CI"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AIZ">Read the full analyst report on "AIZ"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WLP">Read the full analyst report on "WLP"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UNH">Read the full analyst report on "UNH"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/aetna-axes-jobs-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Unemployment Duration  &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/more-on-unemployment-duration-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/more-on-unemployment-duration-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureau of the Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheriff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment insurance income level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walgreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells fargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/27010/More+on+Unemployment+Duration++-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
While I touched on unemployment duration at the end of my last blog, this is a very important subject and deserves a bit more elaboration. Quite simply being out of work for three or four weeks is a very different experience with very different economic implications than being out of work for six months to a year or more. The focus on the total number of unemployed obscures that reality. The thing that makes this recession so much different than the ones that have gone before it is how long people are staying out of work once they become unemployed. Yeah if you get laid off for a few weeks, it can be a pain in the butt, but essentially it is just an unplanned vacation. It does not really affect your long term financial solvency, nor do your job skills diminish significantly. After six months, regular state unemployment benefits expire.
<p>Fortunately during recessions, the federal government usually will step in and provide emergency extended benefits. However this recession has gone on for so long, and we have so many long-term unemployed, that millions were in danger of losing even those extended benefits. Fortunately the Senate finally got around to extending those benefits for up to another 20 weeks (depending on the overall level of unemployment in that state). Still, unemployment benefits only replace a fraction of what people were earning before they lost their jobs. This means that as soon as people get their pink slips, they will reduce their spending. However, depending on how long they expect to be out of work, they do not bring their spending levels down all the way to their new unemployment insurance income level. There are all sorts of spending categories that are at least semi fixed. If you think you will get a new job soon, you don't cancel little Jimmy's ballet lessons, or Betty's karate lessons. Instead you draw down your savings and use your <strong>American Express</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AXP">AXP</a>) card more.</p>
<p>However, as the weeks go by and you get no response from all the resumes you sent out, more and more things start to go by the wayside. But still does it make sense to quit the country club and lose the $20,000 initiation fee you paid, especially now that you actually have time to use it? Well after a few months you have to bite that bullet too. In the meantime, your non-retirement savings are probably about gone. Going into this recession the savings rate had been close to zero, so it is a pretty safe bet that most people did not have a lot of savings outside their 401-ks or IRAs. You have probably run up your balance on your credit card, but the card companies are getting wise to that and are starting to cut back the available credit limits for millions of accounts. That is a wise move on their part individually, but collectively for the economy, it acts to reduce overall demand.</p>
<p>Oh, and since a big factor in your credit rating is how much credit card debt you have relative to your available limit, both increasing your balance and the bank cutting back your maximum availability will conspire to knock off more than a hundred points from your FICO score. In past downturns, especially recent ones, if the unemployed person were a homeowner, he could tap the equity in the house. Now with millions and millions of homes worth less than the amount of the mortgage, or at least very close to it, that option is not open. Indeed this time around it seems that people are more likely to go in the other direction.</p>
<p>To survive, they are simply not paying on their mortgage and waiting for the sheriff to show up at the door to kick them out. Given the huge numbers of people who are falling behind on their mortgages, and to political efforts to slow the rate of foreclosures, this is actually a very rational strategy. In many parts of the country it has been possible to live rent and mortgage free for well over a year before actually getting kicked out of the house. That can free up a lot of cash to spend on other things. However, it is very bad news for the banks that lent the money like <strong>Bank of America</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BAC">BAC</a>) and <strong>Wells Fargo</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/WFC">WFC</a>). It is also going to become a serious issue for the Federal Reserve since it is in the process of buying $1.25 trillion worth of mortgaged backed paper. True, the paper is guaranteed by <strong>Fannie</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/FNM">FNM</a>) and <strong>Freddie</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/FRE">FRE</a>), but since the taxpayers own 80% of both of them, what is the difference? People have to start tapping their 401-ks and IRAs. While the stock market has recovered nicely, it is still far below its peak, making that option even more painful, along with the 10% penalty imposed if you start to withdraw money from those accounts before retirement age.</p>
<p>By the time people have been out of work for six months or more, they have usually depleted their financial resources. Remember that on average, someone who is out of work has been out of work for 26.9 weeks now, and half of all the unemployed have been looking for work for more than 18.7 weeks. That smashes any record prior to this downturn. At the worst point in the Reagan recession, half of all the unemployed were out of work for more than 12.3 weeks. In fact, since the median duration started being tracked at the beginning of 1967, the median duration has only been in the double digits for 36 of those 502 months, and 14 of those have been during his downturn.</p>
<p>To those who say the stimulus bill has not helped, tell that to the almost 5.6 million people who have been out of work for more than six months. If not for the emergency benefits in that bill, they would be left with no income as soon as they passed that mark. I suspect that the vast majority of people who are in that category assumed that they would have found a new job by now when they first got laid off, and thus did not cut back their spending as fast as, in retrospect, they should have when they first got their pink <br />
slip.<br />
<br />
<img class="" alt="" src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1257536842.jpg" /><br />
<br />
It is long term unemployment that is the hallmark of a recession. The graph below shows the number of unemployed (in thousands) in each duration group back to 1960. This is not adjusted for the rather substantial increase in the total population over that period, so some upward trend to the numbers would be normal. Notice how stable the pink short term unemployment line is. There are always people getting laid off, and people getting hired. In good times, the number of people becoming unemployed does not really fall that much, it is just that they don't stay unemployed for all that long. They are either able to find a new job quickly, or in the case of many manufacturing jobs, get called back to work by their previous employer.</p>
<p>The light blue line of moderate length unemployment (5 to 14 weeks) shows a little bit more cyclical behavior, but nothing like the two longer term measures, the yellow 15 to 26 week group and the dark blue over 26 week long term group. What is striking about this recession is just how high that long term dark blue line has soared. While these graphs do not have the recession bars in, I would note that the level of long term unemployment usually continues to rise for many months after a recession ends. The shorter term groups tend to turn down well before the long term group does. This means that the situation is likely to continue to get worse before it gets better.<br />
<br />
<img class="" alt="" src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1257536963.jpg" /><br />
<br />
When these people do return to work, it is highly unlikely that they will be earning anything close to what they were earning before they got laid off. Many will be homeless, without any savings and in pretty desperate shape. We have already seen a steep rise in the poverty rate, which rose to 13.2% in 2008 from 12.5% in 2007 (see <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24677/">Census Bureau: Poverty Rising</a> and <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24719/">Income, Poverty &#38; Health Insurance</a>).</p>
<p>Among children, the poverty rate rose to 19.0% in 2008 from 18.0% in 2007. I would be shocked if it does not exceed the one in five level when the statistics come out next summer for 2009. Since health care coverage is largely tied to employment in this country, the rising number of unemployed means that the number of people without health insurance, already at 46.3 million in 2008, is likely to jump further. While it is true that the stimulus package did subsidize COBRA insurance by as much as 65%, by the time people are unemployed for more than six months, it is very difficult for most of them to be able to afford even those subsidized premiums. When those people get sick, their only option is to go to the hospital emergency room, which is a very expensive and inefficient way of being treated. It is not free either, the hospital will try to bill them for the services, and even send debt collectors on them, although in most of these cases they will be trying to get blood from a stone.</p>
<p>For many, it simply means that they go without treatment, other than over-the-counter medicines they buy at <strong>Walgreen's</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/WAG">WAG</a>). If it turns out to be something more serious, it very often results in death. A Harvard study recently estimated that 46,000 Americans die prematurely each year because of a lack of health care coverage. That is a national disgrace.</p>
<p>While unemployment is a lagging indicator of the economy, it does play a role in the economy going forward. It will be very hard to sustain the surprisingly strong growth we have seen in recent months if we don&#8217;t start to see some improvement in the employment picture. Yes, huge improvements in productivity are good, but people on the ground need jobs.</p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AXP">Read the full analyst report on "AXP"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BAC">Read the full analyst report on "BAC"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WFC">Read the full analyst report on "WFC"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WAG">Read the full analyst report on "WAG"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/more-on-unemployment-duration-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP&#8217;s Health Care Plan &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/the-gops-health-care-plan-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/the-gops-health-care-plan-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Grayson;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-wage worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state insurance commissioners;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26896/The+GOP%27s+Health+Care+Plan+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Recently, Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) quipped on the floor of the House that the GOP health care plan amounted to: "1) Don&#8217;t get sick, and 2) If you do get sick, die quickly." Yesterday, John Boehner (R-OH), the top GOP man in the House, finally unveiled the official GOP plan...and did little to disprove Rep. Grayson.<br />
<br />
The GOP plan would allow firms like<strong> WellPoint </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wlp">WLP</a>) and <strong>Aetna</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aet">AET</a>) to continue to deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions. It would not offer any subsidies to the working poor to help them get covered, and would not require people to buy health insurance, or for employers to offer it.<br />
<br />
It would make it harder for people to sue if they are injured by medical malpractice. The use of contingency fees by lawyers in malpractice suits would be strictly limited. Thus, for example, if the doctor misread your chart and amputated the wrong leg, you would have to be rich enough to pay the $150 an hour than most lawyers charge -- and a case like that would take many hours. After it is all done, damages would be limited to $250,000 for non-economic damages. So a low-wage worker would get far less than someone who has a higher income. Punitive damages would be almost impossible to win.<br />
<br />
It would however, allow small businesses to band together to buy health insurance so they could get rates more in line with what large employers pay, which is a useful idea. It would also allow people to buy insurance from companies in other states. These policies would be regulated not in the state where the person lives, but in whatever state the insurance company decides to set up shop in. State insurance commissioners in the states where the policies were sold would have no enforcement power over consumer protection.<br />
<br />
Since the credit card industry has done such a bang-up job in consumer protection, the GOP decided that it would apply the same model to health insurance. If in the extremely unlikely chance that this ever became law, look for some small state determined to not regulate the industry at all to become the new insurance capital of the country, just like South Dakota is the leading state when it comes to credit cards.<br />
<br />
The plan would offer up to $50 billion in "incentive payments" to states that manage to bring down the number of uninsured, and would offer up to $15 billion to help states establish high risk pools and reinsurance programs. Those figures, however, are not per year, but totals over the next ten years -- or $5 billion a year in incentive payments spread among the 50 states and $1.5 billion per year for support of the high risk pools. With 47 million uninsured people in the country (and rising fast due to lay-offs when most health insurance is employment-based), that is nowhere close to adequate.<br />
<br />
It also makes available another area where the wealthy can invest their money tax-free through expanded medical savings accounts. That is not going to help the working poor, the people who might be working two or three jobs, none of which offer health coverage. Few of them are even able to take advantage of the existing tax advantaged savings accounts like IRA&#8217;s and 401-k&#8217;s. Nice little perk though, for those earning well into the six figures who would like to shelter more of their income.<br />
<br />
With health insurance costs rising at well over 2x the rate of inflation over the last 20 years, there is nothing in this bill that would force that to change. The reduction in the number of uninsured people in the country would be minuscule. Recently, a Harvard study estimated that 46,000 Americans die each year because they do not have access to health insurance. That is equal to more than another 9-11 every month.<br />
<br />
All in all, this bill would be substantially worse than doing nothing. Doing nothing will bankrupt the country within a few decades.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WLP">Read the full analyst report on "WLP"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/the-gops-health-care-plan-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prieur’s readings (October 5, 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/prieur%e2%80%99s-readings-october-5-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/prieur%e2%80%99s-readings-october-5-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 05:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prieur du Plessis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank balance sheets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureau Of Labor Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Cowie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment postcards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ehrmann;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Pettis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panagiota Tzamourani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precious metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Reich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Jastram;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sleeplessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starbucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/?p=11996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post provides links to a number of interesting articles I have read over the past few days that you may also enjoy. Please also add the links to any other worthwhile articles you would like to share to the comments section. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-lessons/prieur%e2%80%99s-readings-october-5-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Over 1 Million Bankruptcies in 2009 &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/over-1-million-bankruptcies-in-2009-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/over-1-million-bankruptcies-in-2009-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Bankruptcy Institute;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-MT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/25457/Over+1+Million+Bankruptcies+in+2009+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
According to a report released today by the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI), there have now been 1.046 million personal bankruptcies since the start of the year. This is the highest since the first nine months of 2005 when people were rushing to file before the draconian new bankruptcy act of 2005 took effect (still better than the Victorian days of debtor prisons, but not much).<br />
 <br />
The institute expects to see the total for the year top 1.4 million. I think they are being conservative, especially given the rise in the unemployed, particularly the long-term unemployed. In September, there were 124,709 consumer bankruptcies, up 41% from a year ago. The graph below (from <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/">http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/</a>) shows the history of bankruptcy filings since 1996 by quarter. The third quarter numbers come from the monthly ABI numbers; the quarterly numbers are from the administrative office of the U.S. courts.<br />
 <br />
If there is any good news in the report, it looks like the rate of increase in the third quarter was much slower than that of the second quarter. However, we are almost back up to the levels we saw under the old bankruptcy act, which was probably a bit on the "too-forgiving" side.<br />
 <br />
Increased unemployment, particularly long-term unemployment, is going to put pressure on this number to continue rising. Before people file, they will probably max out their credit cards, resulting in large losses to the big credit-card-oriented banks like <strong>Capital One</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cof">COF</a>) and <strong>American Express</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/axp">AXP</a>).<br />
 <br />
People's primary houses are not protected under the bankruptcy act (although second homes and yachts are), so filing for bankruptcy does not really offer that much relief to people who are forced to file, but at least it provides some. Judges can adjust the terms of loans (including interest rate and principal) on yachts and beach houses, but they are specifically forbidden by federal law from doing so on owner-occupied houses. A majority of the U.S. Senate (including 13 Democrats) think there is nothing wrong with that.<br />
 <br />
The biggest single cause of personal bankruptcy is medical bills, and for many if not most, these are people who have insurance.  There is a common misperception that people without insurance can simply go to the emergency room to get treated. They can, but that does not mean it is free to them.  The hospital can and will bill you, and turn over the bill to collection agencies to hound you if you don&#8217;t pay up. Yes, you will live, but you will live in a financial hell.<br />
 <br />
Serious health care reform would probably be the biggest single step towards reducing the number of bankruptcies in this country. Well, maybe getting unemployment back down would help more, but that is not going to happen anytime soon (link to my UE post). The same Senators who love the idea of rich people being able to hold on to their ski chalets when they run into financial difficulty, but not letting someone who only owns a modest home they have been living in for years, and who get sick stay in their homes, are the ones who are doing everything they can to undermine health care reform.<br />
 <br />
The most notable of these is Sen. Baucus (D-MT) who has put forward a "health care reform bill" that would force people, under the threat of fine, and possibly even imprisonment, to buy health insurance. At the same time, the bill would offer inadequate subsidies to low-income people to do so, and put NO constraints whatsoever on what insurance companies could charge, and introduce NO new competition to the insurance industry Oligopoly. While the bill has a few worthwhile provisions like outlawing discrimination on the basis of pre-existing conditions, it is an open question if the Senate Finance Committee bill is better than no bill at all.<br />
 <br />
If anything like his bill passes, or nothing does, <strong>Aetna</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aet">AET</a>) and <strong>United Healthcare</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/unh">UNH</a>) are going to be must-own stocks, since they will be just about the only companies in the country that will still be solvent a decade from now (OK, a bit of an overstatement -- but not much; companies will just stop offering health insurance if no bill passes).<br />
<br />
<img alt="" src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1254508894.jpg" /><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=COF">Read the full analyst report on "COF"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AXP">Read the full analyst report on "AXP"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UNH">Read the full analyst report on "UNH"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/over-1-million-bankruptcies-in-2009-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DrStockPick.com Stock Report! 9/23/09, OPTZ, FMBI, NBVG, NVSR, TIBX, EHTH</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-92309-optz-fmbi-nbvg-nvsr-tibx-ehth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-92309-optz-fmbi-nbvg-nvsr-tibx-ehth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stock Pick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyst group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eHealthInsurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Midwest Bancorp Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Griffin Transport Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual health insurance options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logistics Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NavStar Technologies Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nu2O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NutriPure Beverages Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oplus Traders Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimized Transportation Management Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time process-specific  analytics applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIBCO Software Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIBCO Spotfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XND Technologies Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yphise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drstockpick.com/?p=3588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick HOT News &#38; Alerts!
_______________________________________

FREE Daily Stock Alerts From DrStockPick.com

_______________________________________
Wednesday September 23, 2009
DrStockPick.com Stock Report!
**************************************************************

Optimized Transportation Management, Inc.  (OTCBB: OPTZ), a supply chain logistics company, has signed a letter of  intent to merge with Griffin Transport, Inc., a Global Supply Chain Company  offering a diversity of logistics services throughout the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-92309-optz-fmbi-nbvg-nvsr-tibx-ehth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Census Bureau: Poverty Rising &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/census-bureau-poverty-rising-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/census-bureau-poverty-rising-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyst and portfolio manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antibiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Equity Strategist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirk van Dijk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance coverage;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Namibia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rwanda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24677/Census+Bureau%3A+Poverty+Rising+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Today the Census Bureau released its report on incomes, poverty and health insurance coverage for 2008. Most of it was (not surprisingly) bad news. Here are some of the highlights (lowlights?):
<ul>
    <li>The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that real median household income in the United States fell 3.6 percent between 2007 and 2008, from $52,163 to $50,303.</li>
    <li>The nation&#8217;s official poverty rate in 2008 was 13.2 percent, up from 12.5 percent in 2007. There were 39.8 million people in poverty in 2008, up from 37.3 million in 2007.</li>
    <li>The number of people without health insurance coverage rose from 45.7 million in 2007 to 46.3 million in 2008,</li>
    <li>In 2008, the earnings of women who worked full time, year-round was 77 percent of that for corresponding men, not statistically different from the 2007 ratio.</li>
    <li>The real median earnings of men who worked full time, year-round declined by 1.0 percent between 2007 and 2008, from $46,846 to $46,367. For women, the corresponding drop was 1.9 percent, from $36,451 to $35,745.</li>
    <li>Income inequality was statistically unchanged between 2007 and 2008, as measured by shares of aggregate household income by quintiles and the Gini index. The Gini index was 0.466 in 2008. (The Gini index is a measure of household income inequality; 0 represents perfect income equality and 1 perfect inequality.)</li>
    <li>Between 2007 and 2008, the number of people covered by private health insurance decreased from 202.0 million to 201.0 million, while the number covered by government health insurance climbed from 83.0 million to 87.4 million. The number covered by employment-based health insurance declined from 177.4 million to 176.3 million.</li>
    <li>The number of uninsured children declined from 8.1 million (11.0 percent) in 2007 to 7.3 million (9.9 percent) in 2008.</li>
</ul>
A 3.6% drop in the real median household income is huge. While there were some minor increases in 2004 to 2007, real median incomes are still lower than they were in 2000. Keep the $50,303 number in mind the next time discussions of banker bonuses come up. The poverty rate greatly underestimates the number of people in poverty, but even with the very conservative definition, 13.2% of the population in poverty -- more than one in eight -- is scandalous.
<p>Why do I say that the official poverty rate understates poverty?  Because the formula was set up back in the early 1960&#8217;s and was based on the percentage of income spent on food. Since then, the relative price of food has plummeted, while the cost of other necessities like shelter, health care and education has skyrocketed.</p>
<p>Frankly, I am surprised that the number of uninsured did not rise more than it did, given that most health insurance in the country is tied to employment and unemployment rose significantly over the course of 2008. However, the worst job losses for the year were at the very end.</p>
<p>I would expect that the number of uninsured will jump again in 2009. A big reason that the number of total uninsured did not rise further was the expansion of the S-Chip program for children. Without the drop in uninsured children due to the program, the increase in total uninsured would have been more than twice what it was. "Socialist" medicine, also known as Medicare, Medicaid and the VA, has managed to pick up the slack and provide coverage to those who are losing their private sector coverage.</p>
<p>It was good to see that the Gini index did not increase further -- it is the best single measure out there of income inequality, and the U.S. is already off the charts by developed country standards. With a Gini coefficient of 0.466, the distribution of income in the U.S. far more closely resembles that of China, Mexico and Rwanda than it does that of Canada, the UK or Australia.  Our Gini index is twice that of Sweden, which has the world&#8217;s flattest income distribution. The highest level of inequality in the world is Namibia at 0.707. We are actually closer to Haiti (0.592) than we are to Canada (0.320). To see the international comparisons <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality">check here</a>.</p>
<p>With half the households in the U.S. earning $50,303, it means that half the population can only afford to shop at discounters like <strong>Walmart </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wmt">WMT</a>) or <strong>Family Dollar </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fdo">FDO</a>). They have to spend on staples and necessities, not on discretionary items.</p>
<p>People in the lower half of the income distribution are far less likely to have health insurance coverage. If not provided by the job (low-wage jobs are much less likely to provide insurance than high-income jobs), how are they supposed to buy coverage when the average individual family plan costs $12,000 a year? <br />
<br />
The result is that they will only get health care when they show up at the emergency room, which is a very expensive way to care for people. They also probably wait until they are very sick to seek treatment; thus problems that if caught early could have been solved with an Rx for antibiotics result in hospital stays. The only other option for them is death, and an estimated 20,000 people die each year in this country from easily treatable conditions because they have no health insurance.<br />
<br />
<em><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">With more than 25 years of experience as an analyst and <span class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;">portfolio manager</span>, Dirk van Dijk is Zacks&#8217; Chief Equity Strategist.  He also manages the new long-term investing service, <a>Strategic Investor"&#62;Strategic Investor</a>.</span></em></p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WMT">Read the full analyst report on "WMT"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=FDO">Read the full analyst report on "FDO"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/census-bureau-poverty-rising-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cars, Wishes and the Apocalypse</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/cars-wishes-and-the-apocalypse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/cars-wishes-and-the-apocalypse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blade Runner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Molsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitler & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Howard Kunstler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cusack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LAX airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvel Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melrose Avenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mount Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland Emmerich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Waits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pIn my larval, pre-blogging days, I always faced the back-to-school moment with abject dread.  It meant returning to a program of the most severe, mind-numbing regimentation in the ghastly New York City public schools after a summer of idyllic unreality in the New Hampshire woods, where I went to a ema href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FXT2LA?ie=UTF8#38;tag=whiskegunpow-20#38;linkCode=xm2#38;camp=1789#38;creativeASIN=B000FXT2LA" target="_blank"Lord of the Flies/a/em type of summer camp.  And so here I am, many decades later, still uneasy as the final page of the August calendar flies away in a hot Santa Ana wind, and a great hellfire closes in on the far eastern reaches of Los Angeles, and the American money system falls into a peculiar limbo, and every fifth person is out of work, or going bankrupt, or glugging#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/cars-wishes-and-the-apocalypse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Would You Respond to an Obama Wealth Tax?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/how-would-you-respond-to-an-obama-wealth-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/how-would-you-respond-to-an-obama-wealth-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Mankiw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starbucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy  Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasury secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth tax systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p style="margin-bottom: 1em;"Pretend, just for a moment, that emyou#8217;re/em President Obama. You have big spending plans – national health insurance, two wars, and a trillion dollar bailout for your friends on Wall Street. Not to mention paying for the soaring costs of Social Security and Medicare. /p
p style="margin-bottom: 1em;"Unfortunately, revenues simply aren#8217;t keeping up./p
p style="margin-bottom: 1em;"Your Treasury Secretary – accused tax-evader Timothy Geithner – tells you that the unfolding recession is starving the country’s government for tax revenue. Indeed, just as you unveiled your trillion-dollar national health plan, Tricky Timmy informed you that federal tax revenues were dropping the fastest since 1932 – at the height of the Great Depression./p
p style="margin-bottom: 1em;"What to do…cut spending? Well, Obama emdid/em challenge his cabinet in April to come up with a whopping US$100#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/how-would-you-respond-to-an-obama-wealth-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leaving Adaptis, Inc. Behind, Clear Choice Health Plans (CCHN.OB) Signs Agreement with the TriZetto Group, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/leaving-adaptis-inc-behind-clear-choice-health-plans-cchn-ob-signs-agreement-with-the-trizetto-group-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/leaving-adaptis-inc-behind-clear-choice-health-plans-cchn-ob-signs-agreement-with-the-trizetto-group-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adaptis Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPO Services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business process services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clear Choice Health Plans Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[configuration services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information ;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance premium billing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patricia Gibford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President and CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The TriZetto Group Inc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=17636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Clear Choice Health Plans, Inc. announced that the company is terminating its business relationship with Adaptis, Inc., its business process outsourcing vendor, following a mutual agreement to stop service. The company also announced that it has started a new five-year contract for BPO services with The TriZetto Group, Inc., an information technology and services [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/leaving-adaptis-inc-behind-clear-choice-health-plans-cchn-ob-signs-agreement-with-the-trizetto-group-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Antidote to Moral Hazard will be Gold</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/the-antidote-to-moral-hazard-will-be-gold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/the-antidote-to-moral-hazard-will-be-gold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Stanczyk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gold Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Stanczyk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false insurance claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas station attendants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phony insurance claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail businesses;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stewart Dougherty;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapidtrends.com/?p=2079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read a mind blowing article.
This is one of the most intense rants I have ever seen. Yet the sad part is the author is not exaggerating.
Hat tip to Stewart Dougherty, this piece is an eye opener.
I have excerpted the best part:
There is accumulating evidence that the Washington – Wall Street moral hazard experiment [...]div class="feedflare"
a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:yIl2AUoC8zA"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:F7zBnMyn0Lo"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?i=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:7Q72WNTAKBA"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:V_sGLiPBpWU"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?i=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:qj6IDK7rITs"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:l6gmwiTKsz0"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"/img/a a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?a=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:gIN9vFwOqvQ"img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/YourFinancialFuture?i=PK6A7g-pugo:qS0FCZCcGoY:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"/img/a
/div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/gold-markets/the-antidote-to-moral-hazard-will-be-gold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Bull and Bear of the Day Highlights: Acergy, Loews Corporation, Bank of America, Wal-Mart and Macy&#8217;s &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-bull-and-bear-of-the-day-highlights-acergy-loews-corporation-bank-of-america-wal-mart-and-macys-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-bull-and-bear-of-the-day-highlights-acergy-loews-corporation-bank-of-america-wal-mart-and-macys-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loews Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lorillard;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salvation Army;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spin-off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[well-capitalized oil majors;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Equity Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24189/Zacks+Bull+and+Bear+of+the+Day+Highlights%3A+Acergy%2C+Loews+Corporation%2C+Bank+of+America%2C+Wal-Mart+and+Macy%27s+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><strong>For Immediate Release</strong></p>
<p align="left">Chicago, IL &#8211; August 28, 2009 &#8211; Zacks Equity Research highlights <strong>Acergy </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ACGY">ACGY</a>) as the Bull of the Day and <strong>Loews Corporation </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/L">L</a>) the Bear of the Day. In addition, Zacks Equity Research provides analysis on <strong>Bank of America </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BAC">BAC</a>), <strong>Wal-Mart </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/WMT">WMT</a>) and <strong>Macy's </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/M">M</a>).</p>
<p align="left">Full analysis of all these stocks is available at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=2676">http://at.zacks.com/?id=2676</a></p>
<p align="left">Here is a synopsis of all five stocks:</p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/newsroom/commentary/index.php?type_id=6">Bull of the Day</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><strong>Acergy </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ACGY">ACGY</a>) posted better-than-expected second quarter 2009 results, though revenue and backlog slipped, reflecting the tentative operating environment stemming from commodity price and credit market overhang.</p>
<p align="left">With a still healthy backlog, significant cash balances and no near-term refinancing requirements, Acergy remains comfortable to weather the challenging business environment.</p>
<p align="left">Our continued Outperform recommendation on Acergy ADRs also reflects the company's strong leverage to the still very favorable outlook for deepwater oilfield activities and the quality of its client base, which mostly include well-capitalized oil majors or national oil companies.</p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/newsroom/commentary/index.php?type_id=7">Bear of the Day</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><strong>Loews Corporation&#8217;s </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/L">L</a>) second-quarter income from continuing operations came in at 78 cents per share, substantially short of the Zacks Consensus Estimate. The lower-than-expected results primarily reflect higher net investment losses.</p>
<p align="left">However, underwriting performance was impressive during the quarter. A strong rebound in investment income primarily from improved limited partnership results, were also impressive during the quarter.</p>
<p align="left">While the spin-off of Lorillard in 2008 eliminated the company's overhang of tobacco litigation, we think that the continuation of a stressed economic environment will have a restrictive effect on the top-line growth of the company. As such, the shares carry an Underperform recommendation from us.</p>
<p align="left">Latest Posts on the Zacks <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/AnalystBlog">Analyst Blog</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><em>New Claims Fall Slightly</em></p>
<p align="left">Remember that extended benefits do not last forever. Thus we really don't know if the people who are leaving are going out through the door with the beautiful lady (getting a new job) or the door with the tiger behind it (benefits exhausted, now have zero income). We will get a better idea of that next Friday (9/4) when we get the monthly jobs report.</p>
<p align="left">One thing that we do know is that very high levels of long-term unemployment has been one of the defining characteristics of this recession. An estimated 1.5 million people are estimated to run out of extended benefits by the end of the year.</p>
<p align="left">These people are going to be more likely to patronize the Food Bank than <strong>Bank of America </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BAC">BAC</a>), even if they were once in the middle class. They are going to be doing whatever shopping they do at the Salvation Army and Goodwill rather than at <strong>Wal-Mart </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/WMT">WMT</a>). This is a second step down -- they probably switched to Wal-Mart from <strong>Macy's </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/M">M</a>) when they got laid off.</p>
<p align="left">As for health insurance, even with subsidized COBRA (also one of the Stimulus Package benefits), it will be unaffordable when you have no income at all. The 47 million number for the uninsured that is routinely used in the health care debate is from last year, and thus significantly understates things since in this country, your health insurance is tied to your job.</p>
<p align="left">Get the full analysis of all these stocks by going to <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5507">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5507</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About the Bull and Bear of the Day</strong></p>
<p align="left">Every day, the analysts at Zacks Equity Research select two stocks that are likely to outperform (Bull) or underperform (Bear) the markets over the next 3-6 months.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About the Analyst Blog</strong></p>
<p align="left">Updated throughout every trading day, the <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/AnalystBlog">Analyst Blog</a> provides analysis from Zacks Equity Research about the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks Equity Research</strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.</p>
<p align="left">Continuous analyst coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.</p>
<p align="left">Zacks <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5508">"Profit from the Pros"</a> e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today by visiting <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5508">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5508</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks </strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of <a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/">Zacks Investment Research</a>, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the <a href="http://www.zacks.com/rank/index.php">Zacks Rank</a>, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5509">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5509</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.</p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/zacksresearch">http://twitter.com/zacksresearch</a></p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a></p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.</p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />
Mark Vickery<br />
Web Content Editor<br />
312-265-9380<br />
Visit: <a href="www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a></p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left"> </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-bull-and-bear-of-the-day-highlights-acergy-loews-corporation-bank-of-america-wal-mart-and-macys-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Claims Fall Slightly &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/new-claims-fall-slightly-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/new-claims-fall-slightly-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salvation Army;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24134/New+Claims+Fall+Slightly+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
Initial claims for unemployment came in at 570,000, a drop of 10,000 from last week's revised figure. However, last week was revised up by 4,000, so the net improvement was only 6,000 from where we thought we were. The four-week moving average dipped by 4,750 to 566,250. New claims peaked at 92,500, higher than back in April, but recently the rate of decline has slowed.<br />
<br />
As the chart below (from <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/">http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/</a>) shows, recessions prior to the 1990 downturn tended to to come down fast and in a straight line. The last two recessionary episodes had a quick initial decline, but then remained high for an extended period of time. I think we are transitioning into that phase.<br />
<br />
Being stuck at this level means that the economy is still losing jobs, but just not at the rate it was at the beginning of the year. At the same time, other economic indicators -- such as the new home sales data released yesterday and the industrial production data released last week -- seem to indicate that the economy is now growing. Growing slowly, but growing.<br />
<br />
In other words, it looks like we are in the jobless recovery phase, something we experienced coming out of both the 1990 and 2001 recessions. We probably need to get claims down to under 400,000 to indicate that the economy is actually adding jobs.<br />
<br />
Continuing claims (one week behind new claims) fell by 119,000 to 6.133 million. Those numbers only track regular state unemployment programs, which expire after 26 weeks. Well, back in February (6 months ago), the economy was absolutely hemorrhaging jobs -- so time's up, folks.<br />
<br />
Except for one thing -- the emergency extended benefits, which were part of the stimulus package. There are two such programs, and combined they are providing an additional 3.381 million people with unemployment benefits, an increase of 103,000 (these numbers are a week behind continuing claims, and two weeks behind initial claims). Thus if we ignore the week lag, there was just a minor reduction in the total number of people getting unemployment benefits.<br />
<br />
Remember that extended benefits do not last forever. Thus we really don't know if the people who are leaving are going out through the door with the beautiful lady (getting a new job) or the door with the tiger behind it (benefits exhausted, now have zero income). We will get a better idea of that next Friday (9/4) when we get the monthly jobs report.<br />
<br />
One thing that we do know is that very high levels of long-term unemployment has been one of the defining characteristics of this recession. An estimated 1.5 million people are estimated to run out of extended benefits by the end of the year.<br />
<br />
These people are going to be more likely to patronize the Food Bank than <strong>Bank of America </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/baC">BAC</a>), even if they were once in the middle class. They are going to be doing whatever shopping they do at the Salvation Army and Goodwill rather than at <strong>Wal-Mart </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wmt">WMT</a>). This is a second step down -- they probably switched to Wal-Mart from <strong>Macy's </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/m">M</a>) when they got laid off.<br />
<br />
As for health insurance, even with subsidized COBRA (also one of the Stimulus Package benefits), it will be unaffordable when you have no income at all. The 47 million number for the uninsured that is routinely used in the health care debate is from last year, and thus significantly understates things since in this country, your health insurance is tied to your job.<br />
<br />
<img alt="" src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1251385071.jpg" /><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=BAC">Read the full analyst report on "BAC"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WMT">Read the full analyst report on "WMT"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=M">Read the full analyst report on "M"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/new-claims-fall-slightly-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: United Heathcare Group, Aetna, Wet Seal Inc., VeriSign Inc. and Syniverse Holdings Inc. &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-united-heathcare-group-aetna-wet-seal-inc-verisign-inc-and-syniverse-holdings-inc-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-united-heathcare-group-aetna-wet-seal-inc-verisign-inc-and-syniverse-holdings-inc-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-MT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Security Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet infrastructure services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kent Conrad;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mountain View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syniverse Holdings Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Heathcare Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verisign Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice and data services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wet Seal Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24112/Zacks+Analyst+Blog+Highlights%3A+United+Heathcare+Group%2C+Aetna%2C+Wet+Seal+Inc.%2C+VeriSign+Inc.+and+Syniverse+Holdings+Inc.+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><strong>For Immediate Release</strong></p>
<p align="left">Chicago, IL &#8211; August 27, 2009 &#8211; Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: <strong>United Heathcare Group </strong>(<a href="void(0)">UNH</a>), <strong>Aetna </strong>(<a href="void(0)">AET</a>), <strong>Wet Seal Inc. </strong>(<a href="void(0)">WTSLA</a>), <strong>VeriSign Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">VRSN</a>) and <strong>Syniverse Holdings Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">SVR</a>).</p>
<p align="left">Get the most recent insight from Zacks Equity Research with the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513</a></p>
<p align="left">Here are highlights from Wednesday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/AnalystBlog">Analyst Blog</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><strong>CBO Overstates Healthcare Costs</strong></p>
<p align="left">Some of the more outrageous types of misconduct by the likes of <strong>United Heathcare Group </strong>(<a href="void(0)">UNH</a>) and <strong>Aetna </strong>(<a href="void(0)">AET</a>) might be curbed, such as the cancelling of policies as soon as someone gets sick and puts in a substantial claim. Morally, that is just plain fraud ("You didn't tell us that you went to see a dermatologist for your acne when you were 16, so we will not cover your cancer treatment at age 55"), although the insurance companies have very good lawyers who write the contracts to make sure they can get away with it.</p>
<p align="left">It might even end the practice of discriminating against sick people (aka pre-existing conditions). It will come at the expense of using the force of law to get the young and the healthy to buy coverage. Since the young, on average, seldom make expensive claims, those customers would be a gold mine for the insurance companies.</p>
<p align="left">None of those things are likely to stop the relentless rise in Health Care costs as a share of GDP. The nation may go bankrupt, but the health insurance companies will not. They will be even more prosperous than they are today. Their investment in people like Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) and Kent Conrad (D-ND) has to go down as one of the most profitable in history.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>Wet Seal Reports Modest Results</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Wet Seal Inc. </strong>(<a href="void(0)">WTSLA</a>) reported modest results for the second quarter with earnings of 3 cents per share, which was in-line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate. However, earnings were down 9 cents year-over-year. Wet Seal is a specialty retailer, operating apparel and accessory items stores for female customers in the U.S.</p>
<p align="left">Net sales for the quarter declined 8.5% year-over-year to $136.4 million. However, Internet sales grew 12.7% year-over-year. Overall comparable same-store sales declined 10.6%. Comparable same-store sales in the Wet Seal segment declined 11.9%, and at the Arden B segment it declined 4.1% year-over-year.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>VeriSign Divests Messaging Biz</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>VeriSign Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">VRSN</a>) yesterday agreed to sell its messaging business to <strong>Syniverse Holdings Inc.</strong> (<a href="void(0)">SVR</a>) for $175 million. The transaction is subject to certain closing conditions and regulatory approvals.</p>
<p align="left">Headquartered in Mountain View, California, VeriSign provides essential Internet infrastructure services to companies, service providers and website owners.</p>
<p align="left">Tampa, Florida-based Syniverse provides wireless voice and data services for telecommunications companies worldwide. The company said that the deal will expand its mobile messaging capabilities and increase its global footprint through nearly 300 additional employees in the United States and Asia Pacific.</p>
<p align="left">The messaging business has had an annual revenue run-rate of approximately $140 million over the last 12 months. With this divestiture, VeriSign will be left with only one of its thirteen businesses to divest. From November 2007 to date, the company has sold twelve non-core units for $750 million. The business which remains to be sold is Global Security Consulting.</p>
<p align="left">Want more from Zacks Equity Research? Subscribe to the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks Equity Research</strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.</p>
<p align="left">Continuous coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.</p>
<p align="left">Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517</a></p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks </strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.</p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/zacksresearch">http://twitter.com/zacksresearch</a></p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a></p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.</p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />
Mark Vickery<br />
Web Content Editor<br />
312-265-9380<br />
Visit: <a href="www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a></p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left"> </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-united-heathcare-group-aetna-wet-seal-inc-verisign-inc-and-syniverse-holdings-inc-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: China Life Insurance Company, American International Group, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley and Amgen &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-china-life-insurance-company-american-international-group-deutsche-bank-morgan-stanley-and-amgen-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-china-life-insurance-company-american-international-group-deutsche-bank-morgan-stanley-and-amgen-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agricultural Bank of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American International Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amgen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anemia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annuity products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Life Insurance Company;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronic kidney disease;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestive heart failure;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heart Attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurer;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minsheng Banking Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stroke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24110/Zacks+Analyst+Blog+Highlights%3A+China+Life+Insurance+Company%2C+American+International+Group%2C+Deutsche+Bank%2C+Morgan+Stanley+and+Amgen+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><strong>For Immediate Release</strong></p>
<p align="left">Chicago, IL &#8211; August 27, 2009 &#8211; Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: <strong>China Life Insurance Company </strong>(<a href="void(0)">LFC</a>), <strong>American International Group </strong>(<a href="void(0)">AIG</a>), <strong>Deutsche Bank </strong>(<a href="void(0)">DB</a>), <strong>Morgan Stanley </strong>(<a href="void(0)">MS</a>) and <strong>Amgen </strong>(<a href="void(0)">AMGN</a>).</p>
<p align="left">Get the most recent insight from Zacks Equity Research with the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513</a></p>
<p align="left">Here are highlights from Wednesday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/AnalystBlog">Analyst Blog</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><strong>China Life&#8217;s Profits Grow</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>China Life Insurance Company </strong>(<a href="void(0)">LFC</a>), the leading life insurer in China, has posted a 15% rise in profits in the first half of 2009 compared to the prior-year period. The company earned 18.2 billion yuan ($2.7 billion) in the first half of 2009 driven by gains realized on financial investments. The gains stemmed from the capital market rally in China.</p>
<p align="left">Gross yield on its investments in the period was up 3.27% from 2.31%. Gross written premiums and policy fees were up 11% to 87.86 billion yuan. The increase was mainly attributable to an increase in its insurance business. Renewal premiums grew 23% year-over-year, while the proportion of renewal premiums to gross written premiums increased to 66.84% in the first half of 2009 from 60.44% in the year-ago period.</p>
<p align="left">The company said that it may invest in AIA, which is planning a Hong Kong initial public offering (IPO). AIA is the Asia unit of <strong>American International Group </strong>(<a href="void(0)">AIG</a>), <strong>Deutsche Bank </strong>(<a href="void(0)">DB</a>) and <strong>Morgan Stanley </strong>(<a href="void(0)">MS</a>) have been appointed by AIG as its joint global coordinators for a more than $4 billion IPO for AIA. The company is also eyeing an equity tie-up with Agricultural Bank of China. However, the company does not intend to sell its 5.1% stake in Minsheng Banking Corporation.</p>
<p align="left">The company is also a leading provider of annuity products and life insurance for both individuals and groups and a leading provider of accident and health insurance. China Life&#8217;s market share in the first half of 2009 was approximately 39.2%.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>Amgen&#8217;s Kidney Drug Fails</strong></p>
<p align="left">Yesterday, <strong>Amgen </strong>(<a href="void(0)">AMGN</a>) said that Aranesp failed in a large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study that was conducted in patients with chronic kidney disease (not requiring dialysis), anemia and type II diabetes.</p>
<p align="left">The study, referred to as the Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Endpoints with Aranesp Therapy (TREAT), had two primary endpoints. The first evaluated time to all-cause mortality or cardiovascular morbidity including heart attack, congestive heart failure, hospitalization for angina, or stroke. The second primary endpoint evaluated time to all-cause mortality or chronic dialysis.</p>
<p align="left">Aranesp could not show statistically significant improvement in either. While a higher number of strokes were observed in the Aranesp-treated group compared to the placebo arm, we note that drug&#8217;s label already carries a warning regarding the stroke events.</p>
<p align="left">Full efficacy and safety analyses are yet to take place. Amgen will present full results at an upcoming medical meeting later this year.</p>
<p align="left">Want more from Zacks Equity Research? Subscribe to the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks Equity Research</strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.</p>
<p align="left">Continuous coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.</p>
<p align="left">Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517</a></p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks </strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.</p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/zacksresearch">http://twitter.com/zacksresearch</a></p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a></p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.</p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />
Mark Vickery<br />
Web Content Editor<br />
312-265-9380<br />
Visit: <a href="www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a></p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left"> </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-china-life-insurance-company-american-international-group-deutsche-bank-morgan-stanley-and-amgen-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Life&#8217;s Profits Grow &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/china-lifes-profits-grow-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/china-lifes-profits-grow-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agricultural Bank of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American International Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annuity products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Life Insurance Company;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance regulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large agent distribution network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurer;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minsheng Banking Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/24078/China+Life%27s+Profits+Grow+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><br />
China Life Insurance Company</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/lfc">LFC</a>), the leading life insurer in China, has posted a 15% rise in profits in the first half of 2009 compared to the prior-year period. The company earned 18.2 billion yuan ($2.7 billion) in the first half of 2009 driven by gains realized on financial investments. The gains stemmed from the capital market rally in China.<br />
<br />
Gross yield on its investments in the period was up 3.27% from 2.31%. Gross written premiums and policy fees were up 11% to 87.86 billion yuan. The increase was mainly attributable to an increase in its insurance business. Renewal premiums grew 23% year-over-year, while the proportion of renewal premiums to gross written premiums increased to 66.84% in the first half of 2009 from 60.44% in the year-ago period.<br />
<br />
The company said that it may invest in AIA, which is planning a Hong Kong initial public offering (IPO). AIA is the Asia unit of <strong>American International Group</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aig">AIG</a>). <strong>Deutsche Bank</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/db">DB</a>) and <strong>Morgan Stanley </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ms">MS</a>) have been appointed by AIG as its joint global coordinators for a more than $4 billion IPO for AIA. The company is also eyeing an equity tie-up with Agricultural Bank of China. However, the company does not intend to sell its 5.1% stake in Minsheng Banking Corporation.<br />
<br />
The company is also a leading provider of annuity products and life insurance for both individuals and groups and a leading provider of accident and health insurance. China Life&#8217;s market share in the first half of 2009 was approximately 39.2%.<br />
<br />
Recently, the insurance regulator of China allowed insurance firms to invest in infrastructure projects. In view of recent moves by the insurance regulator, which are likely to affect banc-assurance growth, China Life seems better positioned than its peers, due to its large agent distribution network.<br />
<br />
We have a Buy recommendation on the shares of China Life.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=LFC">Read the full analyst report on "LFC"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AIG">Read the full analyst report on "AIG"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=DB">Read the full analyst report on "DB"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MS">Read the full analyst report on "MS"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/china-lifes-profits-grow-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rationing? I Have to Disagree &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/rationing-i-have-to-disagree-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/rationing-i-have-to-disagree-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Federation of Labor - Congress of Industrial Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British national health service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[czar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excessive health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excessive insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generous health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance premiums;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance exclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high insurance copayments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual health insurance market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Feldstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oecd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiation Therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplemental insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Daschle;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment of a certain type of cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twin Towers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Council;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Health Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/23843/Rationing%3F+I+Have+to+Disagree+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
In yesterday&#8217;s <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, Martin Feldstein, Ronald Reagan&#8217;s top economist and a Harvard professor, claims the current health care proposals are all about rationing.  I have to disagree. <em>Excerpts from his article are below</em>, along with my critique.<br />
<em><br />
"Although administration officials are eager to deny it, rationing health care is central to President Barack Obama's health plan. The Obama strategy is to reduce health costs by rationing the services that we and future generations of patients will receive.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"The White House Council of Economic Advisers issued a report in June explaining the Obama Administration's goal of reducing projected health spending by 30% over the next two decades. That reduction would be achieved by eliminating 'high cost, low-value treatments' by 'implementing a set of performance measures that all providers would adopt' and by 'directly targeting individual providers . . . (and other) high-end outliers.'"</em><br />
<br />
First and foremost, it is important to recognize that the current system already relies on rationing. It uses rationing by price. If you can&#8217;t afford the treatment, or are one of the over 47 million uninsured, tough.<br />
<br />
However, insurance companies like <strong>Aetna</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aet">AET</a>) and <strong>United Health</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/unh">UNH</a>) will also routinely decide that a treatment is not covered because it is too costly. For many conditions, there are several potential treatment alternatives.<br />
<br />
The major health care reform proposals (there are currently 4 on the table, and one more is still being worked on) plan on looking at which methods work best, and eliminating costly treatment options that don&#8217;t work very well (but which might be highly lucrative to the doctor and/or hospital) in favor of lower cost, more effective options. If that be rationing, sign me up.  Sounds like simple &#8220;best practices" to me.<br />
<em><br />
"The president has emphasized the importance of limiting services to 'health care that works.' To identify such care, he provided more than $1 billion in the fiscal stimulus package to jump-start Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and to finance a federal CER advisory council to implement that idea.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"That could morph over time into a cost-control mechanism of the sort proposed by former Sen. Tom Daschle, Mr. Obama's original choice for White House health czar. Comparative effectiveness could become the vehicle for deciding whether each method of treatment provides enough of an improvement in health care to justify its cost."</em><br />
<br />
Could, could, could -- but Marty, you provide absolutely no evidence as to the probability of that occurring. If the CER finds, for example, that radiation therapy is more effective than surgery for the treatment of a certain type of cancer, and that radiation therapy is also 30% less expensive, it seems downright stupid to keep having doctors do a lot of that type of surgery. The surgeons might make less money, but that is not anything like the specter that has been floated of the government denying care to old folks.<br />
<em><br />
"In the British national health service, a government agency approves only those expensive treatments that add at least one Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) per £30,000 (about $49,685) of additional health-care spending. If a treatment costs more per QALY, the health service will not pay for it.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"The existence of such a program in the United States would not only deny lifesaving care, but would also cast a pall over medical researchers who would fear that government experts might reject their discoveries as 'too expensive.'"</em><br />
<br />
There is nothing in any of the proposals that would prevent people from paying extra to get these marginal treatments, either by paying out of pocket or through supplemental insurance. It would not deny lifesaving care, it would simply decline to pay for every procedure, regardless of how expensive or how ineffective.<br />
<br />
It might also focus researchers to look for treatments that bring down costs and are more effective. Those procedures would get a much bigger market share and would be very lucrative.<br />
<br />
<em>"One reason the Obama Administration is prepared to use rationing to limit health care is to rein in the government's exploding health-care budget. Government now pays for nearly half of all health care in the U.S. , primarily through the Medicare and Medicaid programs.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"The White House predicts that the aging of the population and the current trend in health-care spending per beneficiary would cause government outlays for Medicare and Medicaid to rise to 15% of GDP by 2040 from 6% now. Paying those bills without raising taxes would require cutting other existing social spending programs and shelving the administration's plans for new government transfers and spending programs."</em><br />
<br />
Note that government spending is about 20% of GDP now, so it is not just existing social spending programs that would have to be cut, but just about everything. That includes the military. Going on the current trajectory on health care spending has the potential to seriously harm national security.<br />
<br />
<em>"The rising cost of medical treatments would not be such a large burden on future budgets if the government reduced its share in the financing of health services. Raising the existing Medicare and Medicaid deductibles and coinsurance would slow the growth of these programs without resorting to rationing. Physicians and their patients would continue to decide which tests and other services they believe are worth the cost.</em><br />
<em><br />
"There is, of course, no reason why limiting outlays on Medicare and Medicaid requires cutting health services for the rest of the population. The idea that they must be cut in parallel is just an example of misplaced medical egalitarianism."</em><br />
<br />
&#8220;Misplaced medical egalitarianism" -- we are talking life and death here! Every year, 18,000 Americans die prematurely because they lack access to proper medical care. That is more than 6x as many who died when the Twin Towers came down.<br />
<br />
Raising the deductibles and coinsurance for Medicaid? Just who does the good Harvard professor think is on Medicaid? Here is a news flash for ya, Marty -- it's poor people. This would result in rationing of the very worst sort, not you get treatment A instead of treatment B because A is more cost effective, but you get no treatment at all and just suffer or die.<br />
<br />
If Grandma can&#8217;t afford the higher deductable and copayment then what happens? Does the plug get pulled? Does he seriously think that runaway medical cost inflation outside of Medicare and Medicaid is not a problem for the economy, even though costs in those two programs have already been rising slower than overall medical costs?<br />
<br />
<em>"But budget considerations aside, health-economics experts agree that private health spending is too high because our tax rules lead to the wrong kind of insurance. Under existing law, employer payments for health insurance are deductible by the employer but are not included in the taxable income of the employee.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"While an extra $100 paid to someone who earns $45,000 a year will provide only about $60 of after-tax spendable cash, the employer could instead use that $100 to pay $100 of health-insurance premiums for that same individual. It is therefore not surprising that employers and employees have opted for very generous health insurance with very low copayment rates.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"Since a typical 20% copayment rate means that an extra dollar of health services costs the patient only 20 cents at the time of care, patients and their doctors opt for excessive tests and other inappropriately expensive forms of care. The evidence on health-care demand implies that the current tax rules raise private health-care spending by as much as 35%.</em><br />
<em><br />
"The best solution to this problem of private overconsumption of health services would be to eliminate the tax rule that is causing the excessive insurance and the resulting rise in health spending. Alternatively, Congress could strengthen the incentives in the existing law for health savings accounts with high insurance copayments. Either way, the result would be more cost-conscious behavior that would lower health-care spending."</em><br />
<br />
The result would be to push people out of group employer-sponsored plans and into the individual health insurance market. That market is FAR more abusive than the employer group market. That is where people get rejected for pre-existing conditions. That is where people get their health care coverage cancelled on the flimsiest of excuses as soon as they file a serious claim and actually need the insurance.<br />
<br />
While I agree that the self-employed and those who are working for small businesses that don&#8217;t offer health benefits deserve a break, absent something reasonable to replace it, it would be reckless to dismantle the employer sponsored system. Now if you want to argue for scrapping the system and replacing it with a single-payer Medicare for All system, that would make a lot of sense.<br />
<br />
Our current system is not something that anyone designed, but an outgrowth of wage controls during WWII, and is not what anyone starting from scratch would design. It is the system we have in place, and without a replacement it would be dangerous to get rid of it.<br />
<br />
<em>"But unlike reductions in care achieved by government rationing, individuals with different preferences about health and about risk could buy the care that best suits their preferences. While we all want better health, the different choices that people make about such things as smoking, weight and exercise show that there are substantial differences in the priority that different people attach to health.<br />
</em><br />
<em>"Although there has been some talk in Congress about limiting the current health-insurance exclusion, the Administration has not supported the idea. The unions are particularly vehement in their opposition to any reduction in the tax subsidy for health insurance, since they regard their ability to negotiate comprehensive health insurance for their members as a major part of their raison d'être."<br />
</em><br />
Funny, the AFL-CIO has long argued for a single-payer system, one that would completely eliminate that major part of their raison d&#8217;etre. It is not just about your preferences for spending more or less on health care. Demand is the combination of desire for something plus the ability to pay for it. If you are poor, your desire to live and not to suffer counts for nothing in the world that Dr. Feldstein inhabits.<br />
<em><br />
"If changing the tax rule that leads to excessive health insurance is not going to happen, the relevant political choice is between government rationing and continued high levels of health-care spending. Rationing is bad policy. It forces individuals with different preferences to accept the same care.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"It also imposes an arbitrary cap on the future growth of spending instead of letting it evolve in response to changes in technology, tastes and income. In my judgment, rationing would be much worse than excessive care.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"Those who worry about too much health care cite the Congressional Budget Office's prediction that health-care spending could rise to 30% of GDP in 2035 from 16% now. But during that 25-year period, GDP will rise to about $24 trillion from $14 trillion, implying that the GDP not spent on health will rise to $17 billion in 2035 from $12 billion now. So even if nothing else comes along to slow the growth of health spending during the next 25 years, there would still be a nearly 50% rise in income to spend on other things.</em><br />
<br />
<em>"Like virtually every economist I know, I believe the right approach to limiting health spending is by reforming the tax rules. But if that is not going to happen, let's not destroy the high quality of the best of American health care by government rationing and misplaced egalitarianism."</em><br />
<br />
For starters there is a typo in the article, it is to $17 <em>trillion</em>, not billion. Leaving that aside, using his numbers, if we could just keep spending at 16% of GDP (keep in mind the next highest level of spending in the OECD is Switzerland at 11% of GDP, and everyone knows what a hellhole Swiss hospitals are), we are talking about a difference of $3.36 Trillion a year by 2035. That is a lot of money in my book.<br />
<br />
Dr. Feldstein must have an awfully small circle of economists he knows (doubtful) to make that statement. There are few questions in economics that are universally agreed upon, and that is certainly not one of them. Taxing &#8220;platinum plans" might be a useful way to raise some of the revenues needed to help cover the uninsured, but to think just changing the tax code would solve the problem by itself is just plain silly.<br />
 <br />
The high quality of the best of American health care means little if it is only available to a tiny fraction of the population. If a few people ride around in Mercedes and Bentleys and most people have to walk does that mean you have a great transportation system? The claim that America has the best health care system in the world is not one that Dr. Feldstein should be making.<br />
<br />
On every major public health indicator tracked by the World Health organization the U.S. is way down the list, and overall we rank neck and neck with Cuba, and far below places like France, Canada or the U.K. Sometimes when you pay the most, you get the best, other times it just means you are getting ripped off. The latter is clearly the case with the U.S. health care system.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UNH">Read the full analyst report on "UNH"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/rationing-i-have-to-disagree-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Cigna, United Health Care, Aetna, Ford and Toyota &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-cigna-united-health-care-aetna-ford-and-toyota-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-cigna-united-health-care-aetna-ford-and-toyota-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/23125/Zacks+Analyst+Blog+Highlights%3A+Cigna%2C+United+Health+Care%2C+Aetna%2C+Ford+and+Toyota+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><strong>For Immediate Release</strong></p>
<p align="left">Chicago, IL &#8211; August 3, 2009 &#8211; Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: <strong>Cigna </strong>(<a href="void(0)">CI</a>), <strong>United Health Care </strong>(<a href="void(0)">UNH</a>), <strong>Aetna </strong>(<a href="void(0)">AET</a>), <strong>Ford </strong>(<a href="void(0)">F</a>) and <strong>Toyota </strong>(<a href="void(0)">TM</a>).</p>
<p align="left">Get the most recent insight from Zacks Equity Research with the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513</a></p>
<p align="left">Here are highlights from Friday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/AnalystBlog">Analyst Blog</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><strong>What's It Worth to Avoid Competition? </strong></p>
<p align="left">There is an extremely interesting post that looks at both the change in the Intrade odds of having a public health care option and the movement in the stock prices of the three biggest health insurance companies, <strong>Cigna </strong>(<a href="void(0)">CI</a>), <strong>United Health Care </strong>(<a href="void(0)">UNH</a>) and <strong>Aetna </strong>(<a href="void(0)">AET</a>) in response to the Senate Finance committee&#8217;s decision not to include such a plan in its version of Health Care Reform. Clearly the current system of loosely regulated, for-profit, regional oligopolies is to the great benefit of these firms.</p>
<p align="left">I also think the evidence is pretty clear that it is not to the benefit of the American public. This is not a system designed to maximize the quality of care or hold down costs or reduce conflicts of interest. In most of the country, the combined market share of the top two health insurance companies exceeds 60%, so yes, we do have a system of regional oligopolies.</p>
<p align="left">But just how much is it worth to them? Well, the market cap of those three companies increased by about $4.5 billion in response to the announcement by the &#8220;Group of Six." At the same time, the betting odds on having a public plan dropped from 45% (somewhat less than a coin flip) to 30% in reaction to the announcement.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>GDP Down 1.0% - A Big Improvement</strong></p>
<p align="left">A big part of the improvement in trade in both quarters was lower oil prices. That part is not likely to be repeated. If residential investment is just at 0.0% in the third quarter, it will be a big help to the overall GDP numbers.</p>
<p align="left">Inventories are likely to swing from being a drag on growth to being a positive for growth, and possibly a very significant one. One area to watch will be the rebuilding of auto inventories. Increases in production at <strong>Ford </strong>(<a href="void(0)">F</a>) and <strong>Toyota </strong>(<a href="void(0)">TM</a>) as well as at still-non-Big-Board-traded GM and Chrysler are likely to add to growth. The "Cash for Clunkers" was a big success in clearing the lots (so much so it ran out of money almost immediately, but is likely to get reloaded).</p>
<p align="left">Not that I am expecting auto sales to return to the levels of a few years ago anytime soon, but going from an annual sales rate of just over 9 million a year to 12 million a year is a substantial percentage increase, swinging from being a negative to being a positive for growth.</p>
<p align="left">These are the signs one generally sees in the early stages of an economic recovery. I still think it is going to be a weak recovery and not enough to bring down unemployment anytime soon. To get unemployment to fall, we need to generate growth of about 2.0%.</p>
<p align="left">Want more from Zacks Equity Research? Subscribe to the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks Equity Research</strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.</p>
<p align="left">Continuous coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.</p>
<p align="left">Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517</a></p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks </strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.</p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/zacksresearch">http://twitter.com/zacksresearch</a></p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a></p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.</p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />
Mark Vickery<br />
Web Content Editor<br />
312-265-9380<br />
Visit: <a href="www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a></p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left"> </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-analyst-blog-highlights-cigna-united-health-care-aetna-ford-and-toyota-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s It Worth to Avoid Competition? &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/whats-it-worth-to-avoid-competition-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/whats-it-worth-to-avoid-competition-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/23117/What%27s+It+Worth+to+Avoid+Competition%3F+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
There is an extremely interesting guest post up over al the Baseline Scenario by Anindrajit Dube (<a href="http://baselinescenario.com/2009/07/31/the-value-of-not-having-the-public-plan/">http://baselinescenario.com/2009/07/31/the-value-of-not-having-the-public-plan/</a>) that looks at both the change in the Intrade odds of having a public health care option and the movement in the stock prices of the three biggest health insurance companies, <strong>Cigna</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ci">CI</a>), <strong>United Health Care</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/unh">UNH</a>) and <strong>Aetna</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aet">AET</a>) in response to the Senate Finance committee&#8217;s decision not to include such a plan in its version of Health Care Reform. Clearly the current system of loosely regulated, for-profit, regional oligopolies is to the great benefit of these firms.<br />
<br />
I also think the evidence is pretty clear that it is not to the benefit of the American public. This is not a system designed to maximize the quality of care or hold down costs or reduce conflicts of interest. In most of the country, the combined market share of the top two health insurance companies exceeds 60%, so yes, we do have a system of regional oligopolies.<br />
<br />
But just how much is it worth to them? Well, the market cap of those three companies increased by about $4.5 billion in response to the announcement by the &#8220;Group of Six." At the same time, the betting odds on having a public plan dropped from 45% (somewhat less than a coin flip) to 30% in reaction to the announcement.<br />
<br />
So what would the certainty of no public plan be worth to these companies? Well 1/.15 is 6.67, and 6.67 * $4.5 billion is $30 billion. Put another way, the market is figuring after the announcement that $21 billion of the combined market cap of those three firms is due to the probability that there will be no effective health care reform that holds back their current ways of doing business.<br />
<br />
If it becomes an absolute certainty that there will be no public option, we could thus expect to see their combined market capitalizations rise by $9 billion. Alternatively, if the public option becomes a reality, their market caps would collectively fall by $21 billion. Just as a point of reference, these three firms currently have a market cap of $52.8 billion.<br />
<br />
If you think the public option will die in Congress, you want to buy these companies. If you think that the will of the 70% of the U.S. public (according to Gallup) that favor a public option will be heeded, you want to avoid or short these stocks.<br />
<br />
If, as some claim, that the government can&#8217;t do anything efficiently, then these firms should have nothing to fear from the public option. However, looking at the cost effectiveness of Medicare, the existing socialized single-payer system we have here and at the degree of client satisfaction from surveys, they indeed have a lot to fear. The government option is likely to prove to be very competitive and their market shares will dwindle, and they will have to actually put out a competitive product, something they currently have the luxury of avoiding.<br />
<br />
The stock market is indicating that the public option would be a serious competitor to the health insurance option and would not shrivel away because the government is just a bloated bureaucracy that can&#8217;t do anything right. What else is indicated is that clearly the most profitable investment these firms ever made has been in campaign contributions.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=CI">Read the full analyst report on "CI"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UNH">Read the full analyst report on "UNH"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/whats-it-worth-to-avoid-competition-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Bull and Bear of the Day Highlights: NTT DoCoMo, Altria Group, United Health Care, Aetna and Humana &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-bull-and-bear-of-the-day-highlights-ntt-docomo-altria-group-united-health-care-aetna-and-humana-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-bull-and-bear-of-the-day-highlights-ntt-docomo-altria-group-united-health-care-aetna-and-humana-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G HSDPA technologies;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Altria Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance industry;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[important tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moist smokeless tobacco manufacturer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTT DoCoMo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on-line money transfer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Equity Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/22926/Zacks+Bull+and+Bear+of+the+Day+Highlights%3A+NTT+DoCoMo%2C+Altria+Group%2C+United+Health+Care%2C+Aetna+and+Humana+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><strong>For Immediate Release</strong></p>
<p align="left">Chicago, IL &#8211; July 29, 2009 &#8211; Zacks Equity Research highlights <strong>NTT DoCoMo </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/DCM">DCM</a>) as the Bull of the Day and <strong>Altria Group </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MO">MO</a>) the Bear of the Day. In addition, Zacks Equity Research provides analysis on <strong>United Health Care </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/UNH">UNH</a>), <strong>Aetna </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AET">AET</a>) and <strong>Humana </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/HUM">HUM</a>).</p>
<p align="left">Full analysis of all these stocks is available at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=2676">http://at.zacks.com/?id=2676</a></p>
<p align="left">Here is a synopsis of all five stocks:</p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/newsroom/commentary/index.php?type_id=6">Bull of the Day</a>:</p>
<p align="left">We maintain our Buy recommendation and the same valuation target for <strong>NTT DoCoMo </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/DCM">DCM</a>), the largest mobile service provider in Japan, ahead of first quarter of fiscal 2010 financial results. The company currently maintains a leading 50% share of the Japanese wireless market.</p>
<p align="left">DCM upgraded 98% of its total coverage area with 3G HSDPA technologies and emerging 4G LTE networks are planned for deployment through 2010. DCM's decisions to focus on mobile content along with a renewed geographic expansion drive outside Japan are positive indicators.</p>
<p align="left">Furthermore, the company is launching an innovative on-line money transfer service. We consider DCM as an attractive long-term investment opportunity.</p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/newsroom/commentary/index.php?type_id=7">Bear of the Day</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><strong>Altria Group </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MO">MO</a>) is the leading domestic tobacco company, which generates significant cash flow and the stock has a high dividend yield. In an effort to expand into adjacent categories, Altria acquired UST, the world's leading moist smokeless tobacco manufacturer.</p>
<p align="left">However, the company is engaged in numerous tobacco liability suits. Several large punitive damage awards have been upheld, most recently the $79.5 million judgment in the Williams case in 2009.</p>
<p align="left">In addition, the 150+% federal excise tax increase should dramatically reduce cigarette volume. A Sell rating is recommended.</p>
<p align="left">Latest Posts on the Zacks <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/AnalystBlog">Analyst Blog</a>:</p>
<p align="left"><em>&#8220;Blue-Dogging" Health Care</em></p>
<p align="left">Probably the most important tool on the table for controlling health care costs is the public option. Essentially, it will let individuals buy into Medicare early. Medicare is a FAR more efficient system than the private health insurance system. For each dollar that is spent on Medicare, more than 98 cents goes to paying for actual medical costs.</p>
<p align="left">At the major health insurance companies like <strong>United Health Care </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/UNH">UNH</a>), <strong>Aetna </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AET">AET</a>) and <strong>Humana </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/HUM">HUM</a>), less than 80% goes to pay for doctors and hospitals. The rest of the money goes to overhead -- principally trying to get lots of people to apply for health care coverage and then to weed out the ones that are more likely to get sick. These companies also spend a lot of money on trying to figure out if someone had an undisclosed pre-existing condition, so they can deny coverage to people who thought they were insured when they actually get sick and file a claim.</p>
<p align="left">The health insurance industry is rightly afraid of the public option, because it is a much better mousetrap and will eventually lead to the industry having a much smaller, supplemental role (equivalent to the current medigap policies offered to supplement Medicare) rather than being a huge industry.</p>
<p align="left">Get the full analysis of all these stocks by going to <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5507">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5507</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About the Bull and Bear of the Day</strong></p>
<p align="left">Every day, the analysts at Zacks Equity Research select two stocks that are likely to outperform (Bull) or underperform (Bear) the markets over the next 3-6 months.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About the Analyst Blog</strong></p>
<p align="left">Updated throughout every trading day, the <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/AnalystBlog">Analyst Blog</a> provides analysis from Zacks Equity Research about the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks Equity Research</strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.</p>
<p align="left">Continuous analyst coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.</p>
<p align="left">Zacks <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5508">"Profit from the Pros"</a> e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today by visiting <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5508">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5508</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>About Zacks </strong></p>
<p align="left">Zacks.com is a property of <a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/">Zacks Investment Research</a>, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the <a href="http://www.zacks.com/rank/index.php">Zacks Rank</a>, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5509">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5509</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Visit <a href="http://www.zacks.com/performance">http://www.zacks.com/performance</a> for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.</p>
<p align="left">Follow us on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/zacksresearch">http://twitter.com/zacksresearch</a></p>
<p align="left">Join us on Facebook: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts</a></p>
<p align="left">Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.</p>
<p align="left">Contact:<br />
Mark Vickery<br />
Web Content Editor<br />
312-265-9380<br />
Visit: <a href="www.zacks.com">www.zacks.com </a></p>
<p align="left"> </p>
<p align="left"> </p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-bull-and-bear-of-the-day-highlights-ntt-docomo-altria-group-united-health-care-aetna-and-humana-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Blue-Dogging&#8221; Health Care &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/blue-dogging-health-care-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/blue-dogging-health-care-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Dog leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Member]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance coverage;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance industry;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance stocks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[important tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public insurance option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/22903/%22Blue-Dogging%22+Health+Care+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
One of the traits that people prize most in dogs is loyalty. However, the question then becomes loyalty to whom or what?<br />
<br />
In the case of the "Blue Dog Caucus," the group of Congressional Democrats that has emerged as the major player in health care reform, it appears that its loyalty is first and foremost to its big campaign contributors -- the health insurance firms and the drug companies. The general claim that they make is that they are worried about the fiscal consequences of health care reform, but when it comes to specifics, they are most opposed to the very elements of the reform package that are most likely to be successful in driving down the overall cost.<br />
<br />
It is easy to figure out why the GOP is united in opposition to the primary plans being debated in Congress. (Some members of the GOP have proposed an alternate plan, but, overall, the party&#8217;s bottom line on the plans currently being considered by the Democrats is NO.) The GOP hopes that if the plan fails, so will the Obama presidency. Sen. Jim DeMint of S.C. pretty much came out and said so ("It will be his Waterloo").<br />
<br />
What the Blue Dogs are up to is harder to figure out. The main answer I come up with is the campaign contributions. For example, Mike Ross (D-AR), who has emerged as the Blue Dog leader on health care, got more than twice as much campaign money from health care professionals as any other source in the 2008 election campaign. Above all, dogs are loyal.<br />
<br />
Probably the most important tool on the table for controlling health care costs is the public option. Essentially, it will let individuals buy into Medicare early. Medicare is a FAR more efficient system than the private health insurance system. For each dollar that is spent on Medicare, more than 98 cents goes to paying for actual medical costs.<br />
<br />
At the major health insurance companies like <strong>United Health Care</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/unh">UNH</a>), <strong>Aetna</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aet">AET</a>) and <strong>Humana</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/hum">HUM</a>), less than 80% goes to pay for doctors and hospitals. The rest of the money goes to overhead -- principally trying to get lots of people to apply for health care coverage and then to weed out the ones that are more likely to get sick. These companies also spend a lot of money on trying to figure out if someone had an undisclosed pre-existing condition, so they can deny coverage to people who thought they were insured when they actually get sick and file a claim.<br />
<br />
The health insurance industry is rightly afraid of the public option, because it is a much better mousetrap and will eventually lead to the industry having a much smaller, supplemental role (equivalent to the current medigap policies offered to supplement Medicare) rather than being a huge industry.<br />
<br />
The Blue Dogs also want the public plan, and/or Medicare to increase the payment schedules for doctors and hospitals in rural areas. That is hardly a recipe for holding down costs, even if it does help solve the problem of not enough doctors in some areas. <br />
<br />
Congress has large Democratic majorities in both houses, so ultimately if health care reform does not come about, it will be their fault, and I suspect that the voters will punish them for it. The current path we are on is not sustainable. If nothing is done, more and more people will lose their access to health insurance. In 2007, 46 million Americans were without health insurance coverage.<br />
<br />
Since health insurance is largely tied to employment in this country (until retirement), it is highly likely that the number of uninsured right now is well north of 50 million U.S. citizens, given the number of jobs lost over the last 18 months. That is one in six Americans. If one considers that everyone over the age of 65 is already covered (in a "socialized single payer system," by the way), it is more like one in five people in this country has no health insurance.<br />
<br />
That does not count the huge number of people who are woefully underinsured. The current system also affects those lucky enough to have good insurance.  We will never know for sure how many people would like to strike out on their own and form their own companies, but they (or a family member) have a pre-existing medical condition. For them to quit work and start their own firm could be financial suicide, since they would most likely have to do without health insurance, or the premiums would be so high as to be unaffordable.<br />
<br />
As the graph below shows (from <a href="http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/us-health-spending-breaks-from-the-pack/">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/us-health-spending-breaks-from-the-pack/</a>), the U.S. spends far more than any other advanced country in the world on health care as a percentage of GDP, and while it has been going up in most countries, it has been going up much faster here. Considering that we have a much higher GDP per capita than most of the other countries on the graph, our absolute spending on health care dwarfs that of other countries. Yet on every major measure of health care outcomes, such as life expectance or infant mortality, the U.S. ranks mediocre at best.<br />
<br />
The projections are that if nothing is done, by 2025, we will be spending 25% of our GDP on health care. The last effort at health care reform in 1993 failed, but the political pressure and the movement of people into HMOs was able to slow the growth as a percentage of GDP for awhile. A rapidly growing GDP in the also helped in that regard.<br />
<br />
However, then the health care spending cancer came out of its temporary remission, and started to soar again. The graph only goes through 2007, but it is likely that with the shrinking of the overall economy, health care's share has soared again.<br />
<br />
The bottom line is that we need a strong public insurance option, one that will have the clout to figure out which treatments work best and to promote preventative care. Without it, the country is on the road to bankruptcy. The gap between what we pay and what the rest of the world pays for health care is sapping the country&#8217;s competitiveness and, yes, even preventing entrepreneurship. One can understand, but lament the political games being played by the GOP, but one must seriously wonder about what the Blue Dogs hope to accomplish.<br />
<br />
If the health care package goes down to defeat, or is so watered down as to be reform in name only (a very likely outcome at this point) health insurance stocks will soar, and the drug companies will be very attractive. Both have been beaten down to value levels on fears that their oligopolies will be broken up and they will no longer be able to suck the life out of the economy.  With a failure or an effective failure of health care reform, these companies will do very well, but the country will be in terminal condition.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1248806568.jpg" alt="" /><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=UNH">Read the full analyst report on "UNH"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=AET">Read the full analyst report on "AET"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=HUM">Read the full analyst report on "HUM"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/blue-dogging-health-care-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Healthcare Plan: A Prescription for Disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/obamas-healthcare-plan-a-prescription-for-disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/obamas-healthcare-plan-a-prescription-for-disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter D. Schiff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author and commentator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euro Pacific Capital Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out-of-control healthcare bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter D. Schiff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president and chief global strategist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sector insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/obamas-healthcare-plan-a-prescription-for-disaster/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Editor's Note: Peter D. Schiff, Euro Pacific Capital Inc.'s president and chief global strategist, is a well-known author and commentator, and is a periodic contributor to Money Morning. Schiff is the author of two New York Times best sellers: "Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse," as well as "The Little Book [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/obamas-healthcare-plan-a-prescription-for-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Dale Davidson: US Will Be Buried in $110.7 Trillion Avalanche of Debt</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/james-dale-davidson-us-will-be-buried-in-110-7-trillion-avalanche-of-debt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/james-dale-davidson-us-will-be-buried-in-110-7-trillion-avalanche-of-debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas taxes;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pJames Dale Davidson’s latest special report, “The Plague of the Black Debt,” went live to emNotes/em readers yesterday. For those of you who missed it, you can access it a id="s6vt" title="here" href="http://www.profitablenews.com/?p=519#38;source=bdniuedm"here/a.  James’s message is simple: the $110.7 trillion in outstanding US debt is about to bury the US economy./p
pUnfortunately, it’s too late to reverse course for America. President Obama’s spending program is speeding up the collapse, not slowing it down. Right now, 21 cents out of every $1 paid over to the feds in income tax goes to paying off the interest on the national debt. Soon, it will be almost double that amount. It doesn’t take a genius to work out that this is unsustainable./p
pIt doesn’t take a genius, either, to figure out#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/james-dale-davidson-us-will-be-buried-in-110-7-trillion-avalanche-of-debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Life Insurance Co. &#8211; Growth And Income &#8211; Zacks Rank Buy</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/china-life-insurance-co-growth-and-income-zacks-rank-buy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/china-life-insurance-co-growth-and-income-zacks-rank-buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Ryniec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Life Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/11459/China+Life+Insurance+Co.+-+Growth+And+Income+-+Zacks+Rank+Buy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>China Life Insurance</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/LFC">LFC</a>) saw first quarter income rise 55% and is expected to grow earnings by 39.19% in 2009.<p ALIGN="left">

<b>Company Description</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

China Life Insurance is China's largest life insurance company. It provides individual and group life insurance and accident and health insurance. With its network of agents, it is able to reach all provinces and areas in China compared to its competitors which have reach only in major cities.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Bullish on 2009</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

China Life saw first-quarter net income climb 55% year over year as investment income rose due to a rebound in the Shanghai stock market. China Life is one of China's largest institutional investors.</p><p ALIGN="left">

Covering analysts are bullish on the company for the full year. 2 out of 3 covering analysts raised 2009 estimates in the last 30 days with the consensus rising 5 cents to $2.30 per share. 1 of those analysts raised in just the last week.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Growth</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

Analysts expect year-over-year earnings growth in 2009 of 39.19% which is much higher than the industry average of 3.80%. </p><p ALIGN="left">

Five year average growth rates are expected to be 24.25%, also above that of the industry average of 11.30%.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Income</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

The company pays a dividend with a current yield of 2.40%.</p><p ALIGN="left">

<b>Fundamentals</b></p><p ALIGN="left">

China Life Insurance is a Zacks #2 Rank (buy) stock. It is trading with a forward P/E of 24.51. The company has a solid 1-year return on equity (ROE) of 22.99%.</p><p ALIGN="left">

The stock has been volatile. See the 6-month chart below:</p><p ALIGN="left">

<img src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1247173336.JPG"/> 





<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/china-life-insurance-co-growth-and-income-zacks-rank-buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deflation Hawks Pray for Inflation</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/deflation-hawks-pray-for-inflation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/deflation-hawks-pray-for-inflation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mogambo Guru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance premiums;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[less food;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental illness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starvation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Macro Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p class="byline"Just because I am safely and securely locked inside the Fabulous Mogambo Bunker (FMB) doesn’t mean that I am unaware of things, especially those things concerning inflation in consumer prices, which is the One Big Thing (OBT) to be feared above all others, even more than that paralyzing fear of someone seeing you doing you-know-what, especially when they see you doing you-know-what with you-know-who and the can of whipped cream, which you never did use, which is the one saving grace about the whole thing./p
div class="entry-content"
pAnyway, I keep hearing some doofus or another prattling on and on about deflation, and how prices will be going down and how this is a terrible idea, sort of like saying, “Shopping during a sale#8230;/p/div]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/deflation-hawks-pray-for-inflation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Timing the Trade in &#8220;Obama Stocks&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/timing-the-trade-in-obama-stocks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/timing-the-trade-in-obama-stocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan  Clifton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Bay;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media take]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[official]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sister site;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilbur  Mills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-68322329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The insatiable hunger for stories motivates financial media. At the first hint of a new development the process begins -- hard news, analysis, critics, and long-term effects. The cycle is so fast that we sometimes get the criticism before most...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/timing-the-trade-in-obama-stocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Killer Summer Ahead</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/killer-summer-ahead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/killer-summer-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martin wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theo Casey;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usa Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pA Collapse of Bond Prices Could Send Investors into Stocks./p
pSummer begins in 3 days. We can hardly wait. We predict it will be a killer./p
pstrongSeveral interesting things are likely to happen this summer/strong./p
p1) strongUnemployment rates will go up/strong./p
p2) strongRising joblessness will increase rates of defaults, foreclosures, and bankruptcies. Not just at the consumer level /strong– but throughout the system#8230; including banks, states, businesses, as well as households./p
p3) strongThe stock market will take a dive as earnings fall and investors realize that there will be no quick recovery/strong./p
pOh#8230; and one more thing: strongUS bonds could collapse/strong. But watch out; here’s where it gets tricky. Another swoon in the stock market could send investors running for the smelling salts in the bond#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/killer-summer-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Affordable Health Choice Act&#8221; &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/the-affordable-health-choice-act-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/the-affordable-health-choice-act-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward M. Kennedy;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare overhaul bill;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public insurance plan;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-sponsored insurance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20927/The+%22Affordable+Health+Choice+Act%22+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />The Senate health committee led by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts yesterday formally unveiled its healthcare overhaul bill -- the "Affordable Health Choice Act," one of several competing bills that Congress and President Obama will be considering in the weeks ahead.<br /><br />Kennedy's bill aims to improve access to coverage by regulating insurers, expanding Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), and building state-sponsored insurance Gateways (or exchanges) to help Americans find affordable coverage. The proposal would provide subsidies for buying health insurance to families with annual incomes as high as five times the poverty level.<br /><br />Also included was a new tax on employer-provided health benefits to help pay for expanding coverage to the uninsured, and a requirement for all individuals to purchase affordable coverage, with an unspecified penalty for those who refuse and a waiver for those who cannot cover the cost. The bill, however, did not include one of the most controversial items of the current debate -- the inclusion of a public insurance plan that would directly compete with private insurers.<br /><br />The question, of course, of whether a public insurance plan can effectively increase competition, lower costs and maintain (if not enhance) the quality of outcomes is contingent on a raft of variables, not the least of which is pricing methodologies. The two sides of the argument for now seem divided between those who view the public plan option as a tool for stimulating competition on the basis of quality and efficiency, and those that believe it represents unfair competition for private insurers and will in time lead to a single public system down the track.<br /><br />We maintain our Buy recommendations on both <span style="font-weight: bold;">Wellpoint</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wlp">WLP</a>) and Humana at current levels despite a neutral stance on the sector overall. 
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=WLP">Read the full analyst report on "WLP"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/the-affordable-health-choice-act-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hemispherx Fights Back Against Feuerstein</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/hemispherx-fights-back-against-feuerstein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/hemispherx-fights-back-against-feuerstein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vlaicu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Feuerstein;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Feurerstein;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agency on Health Research Quality;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alferon;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ampligen;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avian Influenza;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotech Select;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronic fatigue syndrome;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food And Drug Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forbes Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1 virus;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hemispherx Biopharma;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeostatic systems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Influenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese military;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Vlaicu;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Institute of Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snake oil;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media sites;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speculative Play - Biogen Idec Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swine Flu;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William A. Carter;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Reeves;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockshaven.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest developments of Hemispherx BioPharma, BioMedReports analyzes and dissects the latest article from TheStreet.com with an interview involving Dr. Carter. If you are an avid fan of Ampligen and have invested in Hemispherx, this read is definitely worth your time.

Article published by M.E. Garza of BioMedReports.com
“What do we think CFS is?” Dr. William [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/hemispherx-fights-back-against-feuerstein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks Industry Outlook Highlights: BioScrip, Inc., WellPoint and NovaMed Inc. &#8211; Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-industry-outlook-highlights-bioscrip-inc-wellpoint-and-novamed-inc-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-industry-outlook-highlights-bioscrip-inc-wellpoint-and-novamed-inc-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 - Zacks.com;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BioScrip Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Kallos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical management services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information technology platforms;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nova;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NovaMed Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmacy benefit management;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20572/Zacks+Industry+Outlook+Highlights%3A+BioScrip%2C+Inc.%2C+WellPoint+and+NovaMed+Inc.+-+Press+Releases</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For Immediate Release 
<p align="left">Chicago, IL - May 29, 2009 - Zacks.com releases the latest Industry Outlook. Today's interview is with senior analyst Chris Kallos, who talks about the Healthcare Industry, including <b>BioScrip, Inc.</b> (<a href="void(0)">BIOS</a>), <b>WellPoint</b> (<a href="void(0)">WLP</a>) and <b>NovaMed Inc.</b> (<a href="void(0)">NOVA</a>). </p>
<p align="left">A synopsis of today's Industry Outlook is presented below. The full article can be read at <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=2678">http://at.zacks.com/?id=2678</a>. </p>
<p align="left">Health technology holds promise of improved operating efficiencies for many parts of the healthcare industry, hospitals included. However, in the short term those that stand to benefit the most from the stimulus are the companies whose business models are based on information technology platforms. </p>
<p align="left">One such company is <b>BioScrip, Inc.</b> (<a href="void(0)">BIOS</a>) , a specialty pharmacy services provider and pharmacy benefit manager. Bioscrip operates two interrelated business segments, namely: Specialty Services, which is comprised of specialty pharmacy distribution and clinical management services; and PBM Services, which is comprised of pharmacy benefit management and traditional mail services. We currently rate the stock of BioScrip a Buy. </p>
<p align="left">Despite our currently neutral stance on managed care providers overall, we continue to rate <b>WellPoint</b> (<a href="void(0)">WLP</a>) as a Buy given its broad product offering, geographic reach and potential for added synergy gains from relatively recent acquisitions. That said, we believe the recent action by CMS to suspend the company from enrolling new patients in the health insurance Medicare Advantage plan and the prescription drug benefit, Medicare Part D will add to negative sentiment in the short term. We believe the action by CMS is reversible and highlights operational issues that can be addressed by management in the short term. </p>
<p align="left">Another current Buy recommendation is <b>NovaMed Inc.</b> (<a href="void(0)">NOVA</a>). NOVA is an emerging healthcare services company engaged in the operation of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and the provision of optical products and services to eye-care professionals. We remain positive with the company's performance to date, given the continued strength of cash flows from operations and same facility revenue growth. </p>
<p>Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today by visiting: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=2679">http://at.zacks.com/?id=2679</a>.</p>
<p style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">About Zacks </p>
<p>The performance of the Zacks Rank portfolios shown above for annual and year-to-date periods are the linked monthly total returns (price changes + dividends) of equal weighted hypothetical portfolios, consisting of those stocks with the indicated Zacks Rank, assuming monthly rebalancing and zero transaction costs. These are not the returns of actual portfolios. The hypothetical portfolios were created at the beginning of each month from Jan 1988 forward based on the values of the Zacks Rank available to Zacks' clients before the beginning of each month.</p>
<p>The portfolios created monthly from 1988 through September 2006 exclude ADRS and are comprised of stocks that have the indicated Zacks Rank and were covered by at least two analysts at the time of the stocks inclusion in the portfolio. Starting in October 2006 and going forward, the portfolios are comprised of all stocks with the indicated Zacks Rank and do not exclude ADRs, which is more reflective of the list of stocks that customers will find on the Zacks web sites. 2007 returns are for the period of Jan 1 - Jun 30, 2007. These performance numbers have been audited from 1995 through 2003 by Autschuler Melovan, a division of American Express Financial.</p>Contact:<br />Mark Vickery<br />Web Content Editor<br />312-265-9380<br />Visit: www.zacks.com<br />
<p align="left"></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-industry-outlook-highlights-bioscrip-inc-wellpoint-and-novamed-inc-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare Industry &#8211; Industry Outlook</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-industry-industry-outlook-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-industry-industry-outlook-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BioScrip Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical management services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Health Systems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information technology platforms;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nova;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NovaMed Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmacy benefit management;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned healthcare spending;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncertainties surrounding healthcare reform;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Health Services Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/11033/Healthcare+Industry+-+Industry+Outlook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investor sentiment in healthcare continues to be driven by both Washington and the state of the broader economy.
<p>
In late February, President Obama released his administration's first budget proposal, which included the provision of a $630B reserve fund for healthcare reform over the next 10 years, financed in part by increases in taxes and changes to government program payments for physicians, hospitals and insurers (Medicare Advantage in particular). Details of the measure continue to evolve as discussions continue at the congressional level.
</p><p>
Earlier in February, the $787B economic stimulus package was passed in the Senate and House. The $150B in planned healthcare spending will include $25B towards the expansion of COBRA, $20B for health technology, and $85B for Medicaid assistance to states. The package clearly aims to improve the infrastructure of the healthcare industry and ultimately lower costs and expand access to more Americans.
</p><p><b>
OPPORTUNITIES
 </b></p><p>
Health technology holds promise of improved operating efficiencies for many parts of the healthcare industry, hospitals included. However, in the short term those that stand to benefit the most from the stimulus are the companies whose business models are based on information technology platforms.
</p><p>
One such company is <b>BioScrip, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BIOS">BIOS</a>)</b>, a specialty pharmacy services provider and pharmacy benefit manager. Bioscrip operates two interrelated business segments, namely: Specialty Services, which is comprised of specialty pharmacy distribution and clinical management services; and PBM Services, which is comprised of pharmacy benefit management and traditional mail services. We currently rate the stock of Bioscip a Buy. 
</p><p>
Despite our currently neutral stance on managed care providers overall, we continue to rate <b>WellPoint (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/WLP">WLP</a>)</b> as a Buy given its broad product offering, geographic reach and potential for added synergy gains from relatively recent acquisitions. That said, we believe the recent action by CMS to suspend the company from enrolling new patients in the health insurance Medicare Advantage plan and the prescription drug benefit, Medicare Part D will add to negative sentiment in the short term. We believe the action by CMS is reversible and highlights operational issues that can be addressed by management in the short term.
 </p><p>
Another current Buy recommendation is <b>NovaMed Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/NOVA">NOVA</a>)</b>. NOVA is an emerging healthcare services company engaged in the operation of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and the provision of optical products and services to eye-care professionals. We remain positive with the company's performance to date, given the continued strength of cash flows from operations and same facility revenue growth.
 </p><p><b>
WEAKNESSES
 </b></p><p>
Medicaid-focused managed care providers are, to some degree, countercyclical and often perform well in mild recessions. However, and despite the $85B allocated to Medicaid in the stimulus, we remain cautious at this point, given the severity of the current economic downturn and uncertainties surrounding healthcare reform. Unlike other managed care players, Medicaid managed-care companies are highly reliant on funding from state governments, which in turn are subject to budgetary constraints and policy changes at the federal level.
</p><p>
We expect hospitals to gain some relief from the $15B in Medicaid assistance earmarked for immediate distribution to help close budget gaps coupled with the expansion of COBRA. COBRA provides temporary continuation of health coverage in the event of a job loss.
</p><p>
However, we believe the hospital sector will remain under pressure for the remainder of 2009 given anticipated lower consumer spending, high unemployment, and shifts in payer mix further already weakening 4Q08 admission numbers and increasing bad debt levels. We note that hospitals by law must treat all patients in need of emergency care, regardless of whether they have insurance.
</p><p>
We currently rate both <b>Community Health Systems (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CYH">CYH</a>)</b> and <b>Universal Health Services, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/UHS">UHS</a>)</b> with Hold recommendations.<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-industry-industry-outlook-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s GM Decision Will Destroy Wealth</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/obama%e2%80%99s-gm-decision-will-destroy-wealth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/obama%e2%80%99s-gm-decision-will-destroy-wealth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand advertising campaigns;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bury;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia country road;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Motors;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retiree healthcare;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports stadiums;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Auto Workers Union;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=16423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p#8220;GM burns through $10 billion#8221; reads the headline. Surprising no one, “Government Motors” continues to destroy wealth at a record pace./p
pZombie companies like GM stink up the marketplace like a dead skunk on a Georgia country road. Bury the corpse we say. Otherwise the same corrupt, failed policies continue. Legally obligated expenses like inflated bonuses and cushy retirement packages, big brand advertising campaigns (such as the company name on a sports stadiums), union costs, health insurance, and over-capacity of office space, all must be paid#8230; and the bill is being handed to the US taxpayer!/p
pThen there are the lost opportunities for innovators and entrepreneurs who could pick up the pieces and create real value. Instead, the birth of new technologies#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/obama%e2%80%99s-gm-decision-will-destroy-wealth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eHealth, Inc. (EHTH) is “One to Watch”</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/ehealth-inc-ehth-is-%e2%80%9cone-to-watch%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/ehealth-inc-ehth-is-%e2%80%9cone-to-watch%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ancillary products;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Care Center;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eHealth Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eHealthInsurance Services Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eligible health insurance plans;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance carriers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance information;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance policy;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance products;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance carrier partners;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet-based sale;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical health insurance coverage;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mountain View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online chat;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online source;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchase health insurance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short-term medical insurance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined health insurance application process;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student health insurance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.ehealthinsurance.com;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=15219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incorporated in 1997, eHealth, Inc. is the parent company of eHealthInsurance Services Inc., the leading online source of health insurance for individuals, families, and small businesses. eHealthInsurance presents complex health insurance information in an objective, user-friendly format. This enables the research, analysis, comparison, and purchase of health insurance products that best meet consumers&#8217; needs. eHealth, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/ehealth-inc-ehth-is-%e2%80%9cone-to-watch%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Healthcare Plan Is Big Bark, Small Bite</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/obamas-healthcare-plan-is-big-bark-small-bite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/obamas-healthcare-plan-is-big-bark-small-bite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbott Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcon inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amgen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aranesp;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astrazeneca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aventis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biogen Idec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol Myers Squibb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiovascular disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genzyme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform reserve fund;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Waxman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hepatitis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV/AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Energy and Commerce Committee;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infectious Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Napodano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Center for Policy Analysis;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's administration;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[past several years large-pharmaceutical;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfizer Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical earnings;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schering Plough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teva Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyeth Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Premium service;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Premium;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/18947/Obama%27s+Healthcare+Plan+Is+Big+Bark%2C+Small+Bite</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><b>Obama's Healthcare Plan Is Big Bark, Small Bite</b><br /> by Jason Napodano, CFA </p>  

<p align="left"> When President Obama's administration released the proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year, drug stocks quickly dropped. Fears of socialized medicine, or "Hillary-Care 2.0" turned investors away from the sector.</p>  

<p align="left"><b>Was the drop warranted?</b></p>  

<p align="left">There are 6 key components to healthcare reform that could have a meaningful impact on pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in the near future.Four of these are potentially negative, whereas the other 2 are potentially positive.</p>  

<p align="left"><b>First Potential Negative: Increasing Pricing Rebates</b> </p>  

<p align="left"> The new proposal calls for an increase in Medicaid rebates from the current level of 15% to 21%. This equates to a 6% decrease in pricing power by all the companies in our universe into the Medicaid market. If we delve deeper into the ramification of this action, we see that the potential earnings impact for most large pharmaceutical companies is in the area of 1%, at most.</p>  

<p align="left">Most pharmaceutical companies average roughly 5% to 20% of their U.S.business to Medicare / Medicaid. Some companies, including <b>Wyeth</b> (<a href="void(0)">WYE</a>), <b>Pfizer</b> (<a href="void(0)">PFE</a>), and <b>Abbott Labs</b> (<a href="void(0)">ABT</a>) are on the low-end, whereas others, such as <b>Bristol-Myers Squibb</b> (<a href="void(0)">BMY</a>), <b>Eli Lilly</b> (<a href="void(0)">LLY</a>), <b>Merck</b> (<a href="void(0)">MRK</a>), and <b>Gilead</b> (<a href="void(0)">GILD</a>) are on the high-end.</p>  

<p align="left">The overall impact to the top-line is muted significantly for companies with greater sales outside the U.S., including PFE, ABT and <b>Johnson &#38; Johnson</b> (<a href="void(0)">JNJ</a>).</p>  

<p align="left">Notice Abbott and Pfizer are on the right side of that list twice, low exposure to Medicaid, high percent of sales outside the U.S. But nevertheless, we would classify the 1% EPS risk associated with increased pricing rebates as mostly bark, only a tiny bite.</p>  

<p align="center">            

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" bgcolor="#ffffff">                                    

<tbody>  

<tr bgcolor="#a2d39c">   

<th colspan="4"><b>Segment Analysis For Top Drug    Companies</b></th> </tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left"><b><u>    Company    </u></b></td>      

<td align="center"><b><u>    % U.S.<br />Revenues*    </u></b></td>      

<td align="center"><b><u>    Est. %<br />Govt. Biz    </u></b></td>      

<td align="center"><b><u>    % At Risk<br />Exposure    </u></b></td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Abbott Labs    </td>      

<td align="center">    48%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~8%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~4%    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Bristol-Myers    </td>      

<td align="center">    59%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~14%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~9%    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Johnson &#38; Johnson    </td>      

<td align="center">    51%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~9%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~5%    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Merck &#38; Co.    </td>      

<td align="center">    56%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~10%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~6%    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Schering-Plough    </td>      

<td align="center">    30%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~8%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~3%    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Eli Lilly &#38; Co.    </td>      

<td align="center">    54%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~18%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~10%    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Pfizer, Inc.    </td>      

<td align="center">    42%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~6%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~3%    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Wyeth, Inc.    </td>      

<td align="center">    47%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~5%    </td>      

<td align="center">    ~2%    </td></tr>            

<tr>      

<th colspan="4"><font size="1">*Revenues include all operations, not    just Pharmaceuticals</font></th> </tr>              </tbody></table>                                                 </p>  

<p align="left"> <b>Second Potential Negative: Biologic Generics</b> </p>  

<p align="left"> It is clear that we will have some sort of path to approval for generic biologic drugs, or "biosimilars," in the near-future. New draft legislation is expected to call for 10 years of market data exclusivity for new biologic drugs - a victory for the biotech industry as Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA), Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, recently introduced a bill calling for only 5 years of data exclusivity.</p>  

<p align="left">But biosimilars will not be as devastating to biotech products as generics were to small molecules. Manufacturing biologic drugs is significantly more cost prohibitive and knowledge intensive than small molecules.</p>  

<p align="left">Biotechnology companies themselves often struggle with manufacturing scale-up and meeting demand. Manufacturing Eli Lilly's Erbitux or <b>Amgen's</b> (<a href="void(0)">AMGN</a>) Enbrel is no easy task. There are few generic manufacturers with the necessary expertise, or capital required, to manufacture large batches of biosimilars.</p>  

<p align="left">And, there are significant additional hurdles. If the FDA will require proof of bioequivalency, then generic manufacturers will need to start doing costly large-scale clinical trials - something most will shy away from doing. Conversely, if the FDA does not require a bioequivalency study, we believe most doctors will shy away from using the "biosimilar" products because they know the complexity of the manufacturing process and have no proof that the generic Aranesp really is identical to the branded Aranesp.</p>  

<p align="left">It's a catch-22 that generic companies looking to break into the biologic market will have to deal with.</p>  

<p align="left">That being said, firms with potentially the biggest risk exposure to generic biologic legislation include Amgen and <b>Biogen Idec</b> (<a href="void(0)">BIIB</a>). <b>Teva Pharmaceuticals</b> (<a href="void(0)">TEVA</a>) is most likely the biggest winner.</p>  

<p align="center">            

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" bgcolor="#ffffff">                                    

<tbody>  

<tr bgcolor="#a2d39c">   

<th colspan="4"><b>Top Biologic Drugs And Their Patent    Expiration</b></th> </tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Neupogen (Amgen)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2013    </td>      

<td align="center">    Neulasta (Amgen)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2015    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Aranesp (Amgen)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2014    </td>      

<td align="center">    Enbrel (Amgen)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2012    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Myozyme (Genzyme)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2016    </td>      

<td align="center">    Fabrazyme (Genzyme)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2015    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Herceptin (Roche)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2019    </td>      

<td align="center">    Avastin (Roche)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2018    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Rituxan (Roche)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2018    </td>      

<td align="center">    Lucentis (Roche)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2018    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Erbitux (Eli Lilly)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2017    </td>      

<td align="center">    Remicade (J&#38;J)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2014    </td></tr>            

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Humira (Abbott)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2016    </td>      

<td align="center">    Synagis (AstraZeneca)    </td>      

<td align="center">    2018    </td></tr>          </tbody></table>                                                 </p>  

<p align="left"><b>Third Potential Negative: Drug Reimportation </b> </p>  

<p align="left"> A consortium of 4 Senators (Dorgan D-ND, Stabenow D-MI, McCain R-AZ, and Snowe R-ME) introduced in early March 2009 the, "Pharmaceutical Market Access and Drug Safety Act." The bill would allow U.S.-licensed pharmacies and drug wholesalers to import FDA-approved medications from Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and Japan - areas where drug prices are on average 35% to 55% lower than in the U.S. The legislation would also allow individual consumers to purchase prescription drugs for personal use from safe, reliable, FDA-inspected Canadian pharmacies.</p>  

<p align="left">The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates the bill would save American consumers $50 billion over the next decade, including more than $10 billion in federal government savings. If we assume the savings are linear, or average roughly $5 billion per year, that represents approximately 2% of the total U.S. $250 billion pharmaceutical market. The EPS impact from a 2% haircut to the top-line of each pharmaceutical company, assuming drug reimportation hits everyone equally, is extremely manageable, and will most like average no more than 1% to 2% per company if enacted.</p>  

<p align="left"><b>Fourth Potential Negative: Tax Reform</b> </p>  

<p align="left"> (This also the one with the most teeth.) .</p>  

<p align="left">Tax reform has little to do with fixing the healthcare system and more to do with closing loopholes and going after drug company's profits directly.  It is also by far the most socialistic approach to the problem, as we would classify drug reimportation and biosimilars as more capitalistic approaches.</p>  

<p align="left">Over the past several years large-pharmaceutical companies have gotten quite good at lowering their effective tax rates thanks to foreign subsidiaries and R&#38;D credits. In fact, the average tax rate using the 14 largest U.S-based pharmaceutical and biotech companies in 2008 was 23%.</p>  

<p align="left">It is possible that the President's proposal could raise the effective rate for each firm to 30% by closing these loopholes and cutting R&#38;D tax credits.</p>  

<p align="left">That equates to a 7% increase in effective tax rate for the average company, or as much as a 20% to 30% decrease in net income. The details on the tax reform aspect to President Obama's proposal have yet to be divulged, but this does have the potential to be a significant negative for our coverage universe.</p>  

<p align="center">              

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" bgcolor="#ffffff">                                      

<tbody>  

<tr bgcolor="#a2d39c">     

<th colspan="4"><b>2008 Tax Rates for Top U.S. Drug    Companies</b></th> </tr>              

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Abbott Labs    </td>        

<td align="center">    22%    </td>        

<td align="center">    Amgen    </td>        

<td align="center">    22%    </td></tr>              

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Bristol-Myers    </td>        

<td align="center">    22%    </td>        

<td align="center">    Alcon, Inc.    </td>        

<td align="center">    15%    </td></tr>              

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Genentech    </td>        

<td align="center">    36%    </td>        

<td align="center">    Biogen Idec    </td>        

<td align="center">    29%    </td></tr>              

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Genzyme    </td>        

<td align="center">    34%    </td>        

<td align="center">    Gilead Sciences    </td>        

<td align="center">    27%    </td></tr>              

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Johnson &#38; Johnson    </td>        

<td align="center">    23%    </td>        

<td align="center">    Eli Lilly &#38; Co.    </td>        

<td align="center">    21%    </td></tr>              

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Merck &#38; Co.    </td>        

<td align="center">    17%    </td>        

<td align="center">    Pfizer, Inc.    </td>        

<td align="center">    22%    </td></tr>              

<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">  

<td align="left">    Schering-Plough    </td>        

<td align="center">    15%    </td>        

<td align="center">    Wyeth, Inc.    </td>        

<td align="center">    30%    </td></tr>          </tbody></table>                                                 </p>  

<p align="left">It's not all potentially bad news though with respect to healthcare reform.We see two potentially very positive changes that could emerge as a result of new legislation.</p>  

<p align="left"><b>First Potential Positive: New Research Funding</b> </p>  

<p align="left"> In early March 2009, President Obama reversed a standing executive order from the previous administration by lifting the federal ban on human clinical testing of embryonic stem cells. This opens the door to potentially billions of dollars in government funding for this new, and potentially breakthrough, platform.</p>  

<p align="left">Stem cell companies, although mostly small and unprofitable, are the biggest direct beneficiary of the news. However, big pharmaceutical companies are clearly interested in stem cell research, and with a significantly more friendly administration in control, we may see a big push in this area in the coming years.</p>  

<p align="left">Besides opening up funding for stem cell research, the Obama administration has made it clear it wants to see additional increases in funding for infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis-C, as well as for cancer and obesity-driven diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease.  At this point, similar to the proposed tax reform, the details are thin. How much money the government will spend and who will get the money remains to be seen, but <b>Genzyme</b> (<a href="void(0)">GENZ</a>) and Gilead would seem to be the two biggest beneficiaries of increased funding in their core areas.</p>  

<p align="left"><b>Second Potential Positive: Increase Coverage</b> </p>  

<p align="left"> This is the "no-brainer" when it comes to how universal healthcare would benefit big drug companies. There are an estimated 40 million people living in the U.S. without health insurance. Opening up some sort of government sponsored program that would insure even half of these people would be a significant revenue driver. We would view this as a systemic benefit across the entire universe of healthcare companies.</p>  

<p align="left">Potentially another 20 million Americans looking to use prescription drugs could mean as much as another $25 billion in drug sales per year. That would equate to an increase of over 10% in 2010. Therefore, even if pricing drops by 6% and reimportation takes down sales by another 2-3%, the net top-line impact of Obama's healthcare reform may be negligible if the size of the target market increases.</p>  

<p align="left"><b>Healthcare Reform Is Necessary</b></p>  

<p align="left">Fixing healthcare, or at least starting on a long-term solution, is at the center of President Obama's plans for the next 4 years, and for good reason.</p>  

<p align="left">According to the National Center for Policy Analysis, the unfunded liability associated with Medicare / Medicaid is roughly 7x that of the current unfunded liability for Social Security. By 2030, it grows to 15x the size.</p>  

<p align="left">Social Security may be the "third rail" in American politics, but Medicare / Medicaid is the train bearing down on the tracks.</p>  

<p align="left"><b>Still Waiting on the Details</b></p>  

<p align="left">It is also critical to realize that many of the details to President Obama's proposal have yet to be ironed out. That debate will take place on the floor of the House and Senate over the next few months.</p>  

<p align="left">What was released last month was more a broad stroke, sweeping legislation, plan of action. The President called for a $634 billion healthcare reform reserve fund over 10 years aimed at fixing many of the problems that exist with the current system. This $634 billion is paid for through $318 billion in tax increases on Americans earning over $250,000 and $316 billion in savings to be squeezed from drug makers, hospitals and managed-care companies.</p>  

<p align="left">The net result of healthcare reform is likely to be limited on big pharmaceutical earnings.</p>  

<p align="left">As noted above, the effective tax rate change has the potential to take the biggest bite out of profits. What we may end up seeing is a small reduction in revenue growth rates for the largest firms by 2% to 4%, with almost this entire drop hitting the gross margin line. Operating margins are likely to remain stable as most of the company look to cut costs and synergize through mega-mergers (Pfizer-Wyeth, Merck-Schering, Roche-Genentech). The mega-merger trend should continue, with names like Bristol-Myers, Eli Lilly, <b>Sanofi-Aventis</b> (<a href="void(0)">SNY</a>), and <b>AstraZeneca</b> (<a href="void(0)">AZN</a>) most likely the next to jump into the fray. Net margins could take a hit if tax rates increase, which would certainly have a negative impact on earnings, but we expect that this type of broad-based impact to the entire sector will have only limited impact on applied valuation multiples.</p>  

<p align="left">When the President's budget is finalized we should get a better sense on how the above 6 forces will impact each name individually. At this point, the fear of healthcare reform seems entirely more bark than bite. Although there is bite, the Amex Pharmaceutical Index is now down 13% YTD, and our calculations show that the expected earnings hit, excluding the tax rate issue, is significantly less.</p>  

<p align="left">Wishing you luck,<br />Jason Napodano, CFA<br />Senior Analyst, Zacks Equity Research</p>  

<p align="left"><i>Jason covers the pharmaceutical industry for Zacks Equity Research. His article on how health care reform may impact the drug sector helps us view certain stocks in a new light.For example, Teva Pharmaceuticals is identified as a potential big winner with new generic biologic legislation. If you'd like to see Jason's in-depth research report on TEVA issued April 1, you may download now by starting a free trial to our Zacks Premium service.</i></p>  

<p align="left"><i>This 30-day free trial entitles you to much more than just the TEVA research report. You will also gain full access to:</i></p>  

<ul>  

<li><i>Buy, Sell, Hold ratings on 4400 stocks </i></li>  

<li><i>In-depth research reports from Jason and the other 50 analysts at Zacks Equity Research </i></li>  

<li><i>IndustryRatings: What industries are hot and which are not.</i></li>  

<li><i>New: Zacks Mutual Fund Rank with ratings on nearly 19,000 funds.</i></li>  

<li><i>And much, much more.</i></li></ul>  

<p align="left"><i><a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5481">Learn more about the Zacks Premium Free Trial</a></i></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/obamas-healthcare-plan-is-big-bark-small-bite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare Industry &#8211; Zacks Analyst Interviews</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-industry-zacks-analyst-interviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-industry-zacks-analyst-interviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BioScrip Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical management services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Health Systems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Industry - Zacks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information technology platforms;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nova;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NovaMed Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmacy benefit management;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Health Services Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/10392/Healthcare+Industry+-+Zacks+Analyst+Interviews</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investor sentiment in healthcare continues to be driven by both Washington and the state of the broader economy.
<p>
In late February, President Obama released his administration's first budget proposal, which included the provision of a $630B reserve fund for healthcare reform over the next 10 years, financed in part by increases in taxes and changes to government program payments for physicians, hospitals and insurers (Medicare Advantage in particular). Details of the measure continue to evolve as discussions continue at the congressional level.
</p><p>
Earlier in February, the $787B economic stimulus package was passed in the Senate and House. The $150B in planned healthcare spending will include $25B towards the expansion of COBRA, $20B for health technology, and $85B for Medicaid assistance to states. The package clearly aims to improve the infrastructure of the healthcare industry and ultimately lower costs and expand access to more Americans.
</p><p><b>
OPPORTUNITIES
 </b></p><p>
Health technology holds promise of improved operating efficiencies for many parts of the healthcare industry, hospitals included. However, in the short term those that stand to benefit the most from the stimulus are the companies whose business models are based on information technology platforms.
</p><p>
One such company is <b>BioScrip, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/BIOS">BIOS</a>)</b>, a specialty pharmacy services provider and pharmacy benefit manager. Bioscrip operates two interrelated business segments, namely: Specialty Services, which is comprised of specialty pharmacy distribution and clinical management services; and PBM Services, which is comprised of pharmacy benefit management and traditional mail services. We currently rate the stock of Bioscip a Buy. 
</p><p>
Despite our currently neutral stance on managed care providers overall, we continue to rate <b>WellPoint (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/WLP">WLP</a>)</b> as a Buy given its broad product offering, geographic reach and potential for added synergy gains from relatively recent acquisitions. That said, we believe the recent action by CMS to suspend the company from enrolling new patients in the health insurance Medicare Advantage plan and the prescription drug benefit, Medicare Part D will add to negative sentiment in the short term. We believe the action by CMS is reversible and highlights operational issues that can be addressed by management in the short term.
 </p><p>
Another current Buy recommendation is <b>NovaMed Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/NOVA">NOVA</a>)</b>. NOVA is an emerging healthcare services company engaged in the operation of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and the provision of optical products and services to eye-care professionals. We remain positive with the company's performance to date, given the continued strength of cash flows from operations and same facility revenue growth.
 </p><p><b>
WEAKNESSES
 </b></p><p>
Medicaid-focused managed care providers are, to some degree, countercyclical and often perform well in mild recessions. However, and despite the $85B allocated to Medicaid in the stimulus, we remain cautious at this point, given the severity of the current economic downturn and uncertainties surrounding healthcare reform. Unlike other managed care players, Medicaid managed-care companies are highly reliant on funding from state governments, which in turn are subject to budgetary constraints and policy changes at the federal level.
</p><p>
We expect hospitals to gain some relief from the $15B in Medicaid assistance earmarked for immediate distribution to help close budget gaps coupled with the expansion of COBRA. COBRA provides temporary continuation of health coverage in the event of a job loss.
</p><p>
However, we believe the hospital sector will remain under pressure for the remainder of 2009 given anticipated lower consumer spending, high unemployment, and shifts in payer mix further already weakening 4Q08 admission numbers and increasing bad debt levels. We note that hospitals by law must treat all patients in need of emergency care, regardless of whether they have insurance.
</p><p>
We currently rate both <b>Community Health Systems (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CYH">CYH</a>)</b> and <b>Universal Health Services, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/UHS">UHS</a>)</b> with Hold recommendations.<a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-industry-zacks-analyst-interviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare Industry &#8211; Industry Outlook</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-industry-industry-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-industry-industry-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BioScrip Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical management services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Health Systems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health technology;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information technology platforms;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nova;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NovaMed Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmacy benefit management;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned healthcare spending;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncertainties surrounding healthcare reform;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Health Services Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/18456/Healthcare+Industry+-+Industry+Outlook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Investor sentiment in healthcare continues to be driven by both Washington, DC and the state of the broader economy.<br /><br />In late February, President Obama released his administration's first budget proposal, which included the provision of a $630B reserve fund for healthcare reform over the next 10 years, financed in part by increases in taxes and changes to government program payments for physicians, hospitals and insurers (Medicare Advantage in particular). Details of the measure continue to evolve as discussions continue at the congressional level.<br /><br />Earlier in February, the $787B economic stimulus package was passed in the Senate and House. The $150B in planned healthcare spending will include $25B towards the expansion of COBRA, $20B for health technology, and $85B for Medicaid assistance to states. The package clearly aims to improve the infrastructure of the healthcare industry and ultimately lower costs and expand access to more Americans.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">OPPORTUNITIES</span><br /> <br />Health technology holds promise of improved operating efficiencies for many parts of the healthcare industry, hospitals included. However, in the short term those that stand to benefit the most from the stimulus are the companies whose business models are based on information technology platforms.<br /><br />One such company is <span style="font-weight: bold;">BioScrip, Inc. </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/bios">BIOS</a>), a specialty pharmacy services provider and pharmacy benefit manager. Bioscrip operates two interrelated business segments, namely: Specialty Services, which is comprised of specialty pharmacy distribution and clinical management services; and PBM Services, which is comprised of pharmacy benefit management and traditional mail services. We currently rate the stock of Bioscip a Buy. <br /><br />Despite our currently neutral stance on managed care providers overall, we continue to rate <span style="font-weight: bold;">WellPoint</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wlp">WLP</a>) as a Buy given its broad product offering, geographic reach and potential for added synergy gains from relatively recent acquisitions. That said, we believe the recent action by CMS to suspend the company from enrolling new patients in the health insurance Medicare Advantage plan and the prescription drug benefit, Medicare Part D will add to negative sentiment in the short term. We believe the action by CMS is reversible and highlights operational issues that can be addressed by management in the short term.<br /> <br />Another current Buy recommendation is <span style="font-weight: bold;">NovaMed Inc. </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/nova">NOVA</a>). NOVA is an emerging healthcare services company engaged in the operation of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and the provision of optical products and services to eye-care professionals. We remain positive with the company's performance to date, given the continued strength of cash flows from operations and same facility revenue growth.<br /> <br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">WEAKNESSES</span><br /> <br />Medicaid-focused managed care providers are, to some degree, countercyclical and often perform well in mild recessions. However, and despite the $85B allocated to Medicaid in the stimulus, we remain cautious at this point, given the severity of the current economic downturn and uncertainties surrounding healthcare reform. Unlike other managed care players, Medicaid managed-care companies are highly reliant on funding from state governments, which in turn are subject to budgetary constraints and policy changes at the federal level.<br /><br />We expect hospitals to gain some relief from the $15B in Medicaid assistance earmarked for immediate distribution to help close budget gaps coupled with the expansion of COBRA. COBRA provides temporary continuation of health coverage in the event of a job loss.<br /><br />However, we believe the hospital sector will remain under pressure for the remainder of 2009 given anticipated lower consumer spending, high unemployment, and shifts in payer mix further already weakening 4Q08 admission numbers and increasing bad debt levels. We note that hospitals by law must treat all patients in need of emergency care, regardless of whether they have insurance.<br /><br />We currently rate both <span style="font-weight: bold;">Community Health Systems</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cyh">CYH</a>) and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Universal Health Services, Inc. </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/uhs">UHS</a>) with Hold recommendations. <br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/healthcare-industry-industry-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solving the Housing Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/solving-the-housing-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/solving-the-housing-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mauldin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Habib;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bruised group;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Council of Graduate Schools;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dakota Watch Company MY-1 35mm Film Camera;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Shilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home-Depot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Burns;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate agents  pockets;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard LeFrak;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Shiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.frontlinethoughts.com;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.johnmauldin.com;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pLast Tuesday the emWall Street Journal/em published an op-ed by my friend Gary Shilling and Richard LeFrak. They offer a simple solution for the housing crisis: give foreigners who will come to the US and buy a home resident status, green cards). This is a very important proposal and one that deserves national attention and action. Gary was kind enough to send me two lengthier white papers offering more facts. In this week#8217;s letter we are going to look at this proposal in more detail than the small space that an op-ed can offer. And while this letter will be somewhat controversial in some circles, I ask that you read it through, giving me the time to make the case. I#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/solving-the-housing-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Seeks $634 Bln For Health Insurance</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/obama-seeks-634-bln-for-health-insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/obama-seeks-634-bln-for-health-insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Shepard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare expansion;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reserve fund;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Seeks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navivest.com/blog/?p=593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thursday February 26, 2009
Navivest
President Obama is today, expected to announce the formation of a $634 billion healthcare reserve fund, that will be used to pay for his insurance plan. The reserve fund, which will only cover roughly half the expected cost of the President’s plan to ensure that every American has health insurance, will be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/obama-seeks-634-bln-for-health-insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate, House Reach Compromise on Stimulus Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/senate-house-reach-compromise-on-stimulus-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/senate-house-reach-compromise-on-stimulus-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=13489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pNegotiators from the House of Representatives and the Senate reached a compromise on the proposed economic stimulus bill today (Wednesday) and could have a bill on President Barack Obama’s desk by the end of the week, strongemCNN /em/strongreported./p
p“a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/11/stimulus.plan/index.html" target="_blank"The  bills were really quite similar, and I’m please to announce that we’ve been  able to bridge those differences/a,” said Reid, the Senate majority leader. “Like any negotiation, this involved give and take, and if you don’t mind my saying so, that’s an understatement.”/p
pThe package has been reduced, however, from the $838 billion  in spending approved by the Senate Tuesday to $789 billion./p
pMultiple  Democratic sources had offered details on topics that had to be worked out strongemCNN /em/strongsaid./p
ul
li35 percent of the bill would#8230;/li/ul]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/senate-house-reach-compromise-on-stimulus-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check Your Emotion at the Door &#8211; Investment Ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/check-your-emotion-at-the-door-investment-ideas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/check-your-emotion-at-the-door-investment-ideas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemed Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive energy;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond Foods Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Medical Services Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food choices;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food producer;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food producers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food wholesaler;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luxury food makers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael J. Mendes;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nash Finch Co.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/9984/Check+Your+Emotion+at+the+Door+-+Investment+Ideas</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Stocks highlighted in this article include: <b>Diamond Foods, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/DMND">DMND</a>), <b>Nash Finch Co.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/NAFC">NAFC</a>), <b>Chemed Corp.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CHE">CHE</a>), and <b>Emergency Medical Services Corp.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/EMS">EMS</a>). 
<p ALIGN="left">

</p><p ALIGN="left"><hr ALIGN="center" WIDTH="100%"/><br /></p><p ALIGN="left">


</p><p ALIGN="left">
When markets are in turmoil it seems that many investors seem to throw logic out the window.  While sustaining losses can cause anyone's blood pressure to rise, how we react to said losses is what separates the successful from the frustrated. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<table align="right"><tr><td></td></tr></table>
Many of us compartmentalize information and gathered throughout our years in an unconscious effort to save time and cognitive energy.  While this psychological process can help us cut corners in our everyday life, it can prove disastrous for your retirement. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>An Emotional Response</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
After seeing a downturn in their account balance many investors will compartmentalize all stocks into one negative, costly asset class.  Consequently investors will often choose to avoid stocks all together. However, in any market there are firms that do well.  Additionally, market timing has proven to be ineffective time and time again.  So, the important mental strategy to adopt now is one of defensive and, most importantly, logical portfolio construction.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>A Logical Solution</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Simple steps can be taken to find stocks that will out-perform and perhaps prosper in tough economic times.  Before even looking at fundamentals, take a look at the businesses that consumers can not do without.  An easy way to go about this is looking at your own budget.  
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Odds are you are not buying new cars or furniture, but I doubt you are cutting your health insurance.  Your eating habits may have changed so instead of luxury food makers you may want to investigate companies that offer inexpensive alternative when dining out or food producers geared toward cooking at home. Do yourself a favor and do not lump these types of stocks in with high-flying tech stocks.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
As for how to pick defensive stocks, you can read more about selecting defensive companies in a previous "Investment Ideas" article from my Sept 19 article <a href="http://www.zacks.com/commentary/8646/Getting+Defensive+in+an+Offensive+Market">Getting Defensive in an Offensive Market".</a>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Some Examples</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Below are just a few ideas of companies in industries with consistent demand and could benefit from consumers changing habits.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Diamond Foods, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/DMND">DMND</a>)announced record snack sales on Dec 23.  Snacks grew 22% in Nov, to above $5 million, the best month on record. The stocks beta is currently -0.1, ideal for uncertain markets. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The food producer makes affordable and healthy snacks as well as confections used in at home meal preparation.  
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Michael J. Mendes, President and CEO, said "Looking ahead, our brands are well positioned to benefit from changes in spending patterns as consumers prepare more meals at home or look for greater value in their food choices." 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Nash Finch Co.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/NAFC">NAFC</a>) has a beta of 0.6, which could me more conservative, but given their business they are quite attractive at roughly 10 times forward earnings. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Nash is a food wholesaler, retailer, and distributor for the nations military. Total sales of $1.44 billion were announced during the company's third-quarter earnings announcement on Nov 6.  Sales rose 5.1% on a year-over-year basis, up from $1.38 billion. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Chemed Corp.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CHE">CHE</a>) reported impressive third-quarter results in its latest announcement that included earnings per share of 79 cents.  Earnings came in 3 cents over the consensus for the second consecutive surprise and the third in the past 4 quarters.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The hospice provider, which has a beta of just 0.1, saw revenues rise to $288 million, a 5.8% year-over-year increase.  The main driver was the VITAS segment, which saw patient revenue rise 8.7% to $205 million. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Emergency Medical Services Corp.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/EMS">EMS</a>) is a leading provider of emergency medical and transportation services. In its latest announcement EMSC reported third-quarter results that included net revenue of $679 million, a 28% year-over-year increase. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Earnings per share were 66 cents, 94% higher than the third quarter of 2007. Net income was 47% higher than the consensus estimate, making it the third consecutive earnings surprise. The company also raised full-year guidance again and now expect EPS to be between $1.90 and $2.00, up from between $1.70 and $1.75.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The beta for the medical services provider is just 0.5.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Tying it All Together</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
As you can see, using a logical thought process and focusing on the basics is a necessity in this market.  Take a look at what changes you are making or not making to your lifestyle or spending habits and odds are most Americans are doing the same.  Find out who can profit from that and don't be afraid to get on board.  Just make sure to take your time, do the due diligence, and above all remember that not all stocks are the same. <br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=CHE">"CHE" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=NAFC">"NAFC" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=EMS">"EMS" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=DMND">"DMND" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/check-your-emotion-at-the-door-investment-ideas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check Your Emotions at the Door &#8211; Investment Ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/check-your-emotions-at-the-door-investment-ideas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/check-your-emotions-at-the-door-investment-ideas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemed Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive energy;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond Foods Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Medical Services Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food choices;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food producer;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food producers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food wholesaler;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luxury food makers;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael J. Mendes;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nash Finch Co.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/commentary/9985/Check+Your+Emotions+at+the+Door+-+Investment+Ideas</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Stocks highlighted in this article include: <b>Diamond Foods, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/DMND">DMND</a>), <b>Nash Finch Co.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/NAFC">NAFC</a>), <b>Chemed Corp.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CHE">CHE</a>), and <b>Emergency Medical Services Corp.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/EMS">EMS</a>). 
<p ALIGN="left">

</p><p ALIGN="left"><hr ALIGN="center" WIDTH="100%"/><br /></p><p ALIGN="left">


</p><p ALIGN="left">
When markets are in turmoil it seems that many investors seem to throw logic out the window.  While sustaining losses can cause anyone's blood pressure to rise, how we react to said losses is what separates the successful from the frustrated. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<table align="right"><tr><td></td></tr></table>
Many of us compartmentalize information and gathered throughout our years in an unconscious effort to save time and cognitive energy.  While this psychological process can help us cut corners in our everyday life, it can prove disastrous for your retirement. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>An Emotional Response</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
After seeing a downturn in their account balance many investors will compartmentalize all stocks into one negative, costly asset class.  Consequently investors will often choose to avoid stocks all together. However, in any market there are firms that do well.  Additionally, market timing has proven to be ineffective time and time again.  So, the important mental strategy to adopt now is one of defensive and, most importantly, logical portfolio construction.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>A Logical Solution</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Simple steps can be taken to find stocks that will out-perform and perhaps prosper in tough economic times.  Before even looking at fundamentals, take a look at the businesses that consumers can not do without.  An easy way to go about this is looking at your own budget.  
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Odds are you are not buying new cars or furniture, but I doubt you are cutting your health insurance.  Your eating habits may have changed so instead of luxury food makers you may want to investigate companies that offer inexpensive alternative when dining out or food producers geared toward cooking at home. Do yourself a favor and do not lump these types of stocks in with high-flying tech stocks.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
As for how to pick defensive stocks, you can read more about selecting defensive companies in a previous "Investment Ideas" article from my Sept 19 article <a href="http://www.zacks.com/commentary/8646/Getting+Defensive+in+an+Offensive+Market">Getting Defensive in an Offensive Market".</a>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Some Examples</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Below are just a few ideas of companies in industries with consistent demand and could benefit from consumers changing habits.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Diamond Foods, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/DMND">DMND</a>)announced record snack sales on Dec 23.  Snacks grew 22% in Nov, to above $5 million, the best month on record. The stocks beta is currently -0.1, ideal for uncertain markets. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The food producer makes affordable and healthy snacks as well as confections used in at home meal preparation.  
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Michael J. Mendes, President and CEO, said "Looking ahead, our brands are well positioned to benefit from changes in spending patterns as consumers prepare more meals at home or look for greater value in their food choices." 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Nash Finch Co.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/NAFC">NAFC</a>) has a beta of 0.6, which could me more conservative, but given their business they are quite attractive at roughly 10 times forward earnings. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Nash is a food wholesaler, retailer, and distributor for the nations military. Total sales of $1.44 billion were announced during the company's third-quarter earnings announcement on Nov 6.  Sales rose 5.1% on a year-over-year basis, up from $1.38 billion. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Chemed Corp.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CHE">CHE</a>) reported impressive third-quarter results in its latest announcement that included earnings per share of 79 cents.  Earnings came in 3 cents over the consensus for the second consecutive surprise and the third in the past 4 quarters.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The hospice provider, which has a beta of just 0.1, saw revenues rise to $288 million, a 5.8% year-over-year increase.  The main driver was the VITAS segment, which saw patient revenue rise 8.7% to $205 million. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Emergency Medical Services Corp.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/EMS">EMS</a>) is a leading provider of emergency medical and transportation services. In its latest announcement EMSC reported third-quarter results that included net revenue of $679 million, a 28% year-over-year increase. 
</p><p ALIGN="left">
Earnings per share were 66 cents, 94% higher than the third quarter of 2007. Net income was 47% higher than the consensus estimate, making it the third consecutive earnings surprise. The company also raised full-year guidance again and now expect EPS to be between $1.90 and $2.00, up from between $1.70 and $1.75.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
The beta for the medical services provider is just 0.5.
</p><p ALIGN="left">
<b>Tying it All Together</b>
</p><p ALIGN="left">
As you can see, using a logical thought process and focusing on the basics is a necessity in this market.  Take a look at what changes you are making or not making to your lifestyle or spending habits and odds are most Americans are doing the same.  Find out who can profit from that and don't be afraid to get on board.  Just make sure to take your time, do the due diligence, and above all remember that not all stocks are the same. <br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=CHE">"CHE" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=NAFC">"NAFC" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=EMS">"EMS" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=DMND">"DMND" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br /></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/check-your-emotions-at-the-door-investment-ideas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can We Trust Economists?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-india-stocks/can-we-trust-economists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-india-stocks/can-we-trust-economists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer-paid health insurance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandated employer-paid health insurance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princeton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uwe Reinhardt;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianeconomy.org/?p=721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does one differentiate between facts-based analysis and personal opinions?
Uwe Reinhardt, an economics professor at Princeton says
Matters are worse when, wittingly or unwittingly, economists infuse their analysis with their own (or a political client’s) preferred ideology.
Consider, for example, President Bill Clinton’s 1993-94 health-reform plan. In this plan, President Clinton proposed a mandate on employers to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-india-stocks/can-we-trust-economists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WellPoint a Buy Pre-Earnings &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wellpoint-a-buy-pre-earnings-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wellpoint-a-buy-pre-earnings-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellpoint Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/16800/WellPoint+a+Buy+Pre-Earnings+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>WellPoint, Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wlp">WLP</a>) is the largest publicly traded commercial health benefits company, in terms of membership in the US. On January 12, 2009, WLP announced that The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) had suspended the company from enrolling new patients in the health insurance Medicare Advantage plan and the prescription drug benefit, Medicare Part D due to a "sharp" increase in consumer complaints.</p>
<p>We believe the action by CMS is reversible and highlights operational issues that can be addressed by management in the short term. We are presently reviewing our 6-month share price target in light of recent guidance by management however maintain our Buy recommendation at current levels.</p>
<p>WellPoint had been working with CMS to resolve issues identified as a result of internal compliance audits and findings. The decision does not affect current Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in the company's plans. The company also announced it expects to record $349M in net investment losses after taxes for 4Q08. WLP will report 4Q08 financial results on January 28, 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zacks.com/ZER/zer_comp_reports.php?f_ticker=wlp">Read the analyst note on WLP</a></p>
<p></p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=YAHOO_content_ZRANK&#38;t=WLP">"WLP" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wellpoint-a-buy-pre-earnings-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Discussion on Capitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/more-discussion-on-capitalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/more-discussion-on-capitalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 05:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael E. Brisky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthem;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Jr.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deposit insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Watkins;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FULL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael brisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolas Sarkozy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yaron Brook;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-819581243324579563.post-3349121582545482426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to add an additional article that I found to the discussion of free-market capitalism and its role in the current economic crisis.  This comes from Yaron Brook and Don Watkins via the a href="http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=index"Ayn Rand Institue/a.  Ayn Rand is the author of classic novels such as Atlas Shrugged, The Fountainhead, and Anthem. br /br /br /strongStop Blaming Capitalism for Government Failuresbr /By /stronga href="http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=media_YaronBrook"strongYaron Brook/strong/astrong and /stronga href="http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=media_DonWatkins"strongDon Watkins/strong/abr /br /br /Speaking of the financial crisis, French president Nicolas Sarkozy recently said, “Laissez-faire is finished. The all-powerful market that always knows best is finished.”br /br /Sarkozy was echoing the views of many, including president-elect Obama, who assume that the financial crisis was caused by free markets--by “unbridled greed” unleashed by decades of deregulation and a “hands off” approach to the economy. And given this premise, the solution, they say, is obvious. To solve this crisis and prevent another one, we need a heavy dose of Uncle Sam’s elixir: government intervention. Whether it’s more bailouts, stricter regulation, a new round of nationalizations, or some other scheme, the only question since day one has been how, not whether, government is going to intervene.br /br /And the issue is wider than the financial crisis. Millions of Americans don’t have health insurance? Well, says Obama, that’s because we’ve left the health-care system to the free market. The solution: a complete government takeover of medicine. A few companies engaged in accounting fraud? It must be because we didn’t impose enough regulations on businessmen. The solution: rein in corporations with Sarbanes-Oxley.br /br /But while capitalism may be a convenient scapegoat, it did not cause any of these problems. Indeed, whatever one wishes to call the unruly mixture of freedom and government controls that made up our economic and political system during the last three decades, one cannot call it capitalism.br /br /Take a step back. In the lead up to the “Reagan Revolution,” the explosive growth of government during the ’60s and ’70s had left the American economy in disarray. A crushing tax burden, runaway inflation, brutal unemployment, and economic stagnation had Americans looking for an alternative. That’s what Reagan offered, denouncing big government and promising a new “morning in America.”br /br /Under Reagan, some taxes were reduced, inflation was subdued, a few regulations were relaxed--and the economy roared back to life. But while markets were able to function to a greater degree than in the immediate past, the regulatory and welfare state remained largely untouched, with government spending continuing to increase, as well as some taxes. Later administrations were even worse. Bush Jr., often laughably called a champion of free markets, presided over massive new governmental controls like Sarbanes-Oxley and massive new welfare programs like the prescription drug benefit.br /br /None of this is consistent with capitalism. As the economic system that fully recognizes and protects individual rights, including the right to private property, capitalism means, in Ayn Rand’s words, “the abolition of any and all forms of government intervention in production and trade, the separation of State and Economics, in the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of Church and State.” Laissez-faire means laissez-faire: no welfare state entitlements, no Federal Reserve monetary manipulation, no regulatory bullying, no controls, no government interference in the economy. The government’s job under capitalism is single but crucial: to protect individual rights from violation by force or fraud.br /br /America came closest to this system in the latter half of the nineteenth century. The result was an unprecedented explosion of wealth creation and consequent rise in the standard of living. Even now, when the fading remnants of capitalism are badly crippled by endless controls, we see that the freest countries--those which retain the most capitalist elements--have the highest standard of living.br /br /Why then should capitalism take the blame today--when capitalism doesn’t even exist? Consider the current crisis. The causes are complex, but the driving force is clearly government intervention: the Fed keeping interest rates below the rate of inflation, thus encouraging people to borrow and providing the impetus for a housing bubble; the Community Reinvestment Act, which forces banks to lend money to low-income and poor-credit households; the creation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with government-guaranteed debt leading to artificially low mortgage rates and the illusion that the financial instruments created by bundling them are low risk; government-licensed rating agencies, which gave AAA ratings to mortgage-backed securities, creating a false sense of confidence; deposit insurance and the “too big to fail” doctrine, whose bailout promises have created huge distortions in incentives and risk-taking throughout the financial system; and so on. In the face of this long list, who can say with a straight face that the housing and financial markets were frontiers of “cowboy capitalism”?br /br /This is just the latest example of a pattern that has been going on since the rise of capitalism: capitalism is blamed for the ills of government intervention--and then even more government intervention is proposed as the cure. The Great Depression? Despite massive evidence that the Federal Reserve’s and other government policies were responsible for the crash and the inability of the economy to recover, it was laissez-faire that was blamed. Consequently, in the aftermath, the government’s power over the economy was not curtailed but dramatically expanded. Or what about the energy crisis of the 1970s? Despite compelling evidence that it was brought on by monetary inflation exacerbated by the abandonment of the remnants of the gold standard, and made worse by prices controls, “greedy” oil companies were blamed. The prescribed “solution” was for the government to exert even more control.br /br /It’s time to stop blaming capitalism for the sins of government intervention, and give true laissez-faire a chance. Now that would be a change we could believe in.br /br /br /br /If you agree with this line of thinking, there are some great sources out there for reading. br /br /a href="http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=index"Ayn Rand Institue/abr /br /a href="http://www.mises.org/"Ludwig von Mises Institute/abr /br /a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/"Lew Rockwell.com /abr /br /a href="http://www.campaignforliberty.com/"Campaign For Liberty /a]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-energy-markets/more-discussion-on-capitalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double and Triple-Profit Ideas For 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/double-and-triple-profit-ideas-for-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/double-and-triple-profit-ideas-for-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Altria Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Madoff;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England's Christmas;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Steel Holding;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Tool Works;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobs Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil And Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pasadena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shirley Temple;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southwest airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=10409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pstrongQuote of the week/strong: emI stopped believing in Santa Claus when I was six. Mother took me to see him in a department store and he asked for my autograph. – /emShirley Temple/p
pHere are eight stocking stuffers to unwrap./p
p1) The conversation between Libertarians and the rest of us (who aren#8217;t on some nutty fringe) would go a lot smoother if we would all agree that laws and regulations do not prevent bad behavior./p
pRather, they are merely guideposts to measure the quality of deviance in a way that allows the US#8217;s local, state and federal judiciary to hand out retribution./p
pIf you need further proof of this, I offer you two words – Bernard Madoff./p
pIn an under-regulated world, Ponzi schemes might not#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/double-and-triple-profit-ideas-for-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Consumer Economy Can’t Run Without Its Consumers</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-consumer-economy-can%e2%80%99t-run-without-its-consumers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-consumer-economy-can%e2%80%99t-run-without-its-consumers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Carpenter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Automotive Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cherry   Pick;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Truman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute For Supply Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynn Carpenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewer systems;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Administration;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worn infrastructure;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=9614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pStop blaming the unions for Detroit#8217;s shortcomings, says strongLynn Carpenter/strong. Of course, jobs have to be cut in a recession. But this is not the silver bullet for businesses. And every job lost is a consumer lost, which is a big deal in a consumer economy. Lynn says we have no hope of an economic recovery until spiraling unemployment is brought under control./p
pThis from Investor#8217;s Daily Edge:/p
blockquotepConsumers drive the American economy. Give them confidence in their jobs and they work hard, create value, make money and exchange it gladly./p
pTake away their jobs, and it all stops.  The flow even stops when people who still have jobs become worried by the trouble they see around them. And that is exactly what#8230;/p/blockquote]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/a-consumer-economy-can%e2%80%99t-run-without-its-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston Globe: What Would a 2009 Depression Look Like?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/boston-globe-what-would-a-2009-depression-look-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/boston-globe-what-would-a-2009-depression-look-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trader Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans Stand;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bookstore chain;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution networks;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drive-through fast food;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mcdonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organic Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul  Farrell;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Boston Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterstone;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post-3095244252494721835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As negative as I am, I am not on the bandwagon for a "Depression" - while I  think unemployment is mightily understated by our government [Nov  7: October's Unemployment Rate Reaches "6.5%"] and probably will reach  levels (in real terms, not government terms) that will be debilitating in the  next 18 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/boston-globe-what-would-a-2009-depression-look-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgia Stocks</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/georgia-stocks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/georgia-stocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Fuld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Market News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFLAC Incorporated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coca-Cola Company;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food processing industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genuine Parts Company;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Depot Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improvement products;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intercontinental Exchange Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invesco Ltd.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oca Cola Enterprises Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Edward Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Company;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suntrust Banks Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Parcel Service Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23020893.post-7734811807573687183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T9VXVyuEITg/SSDXXfo70pI/AAAAAAAAAlc/m0SC4WuphaM/s1600-h/Georgia.JPG"><img style="240px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T9VXVyuEITg/SSDXXfo70pI/AAAAAAAAAlc/m0SC4WuphaM/s320/Georgia.JPG" border="0" /></a><br />As one of the states with the largest manufacturing industries in the country, it is no mystery as to why Georgia ranks as one of the top consumers of energy. Some interesting facts on what is the world 28th largest economy follow:<br /><br />1. The travel industry contributes around $20 billion a year to the state economy.<br />2. Georgia’s bioscience industry generates 15,000 jobs.<br />3. Over 250 bioscience companies are headquartered in the state.<br />4. The Georgia paper industry is second only to Alabama, and it employs 26,000 workers.<br />5. The state has the largest commercial forest in the country, which produce over $19 billion in revenue and employ more than 150,000 people.<br />6. The food processing industry generates more than 70,000 jobs, and produces sales receipt of over $16 billion a year.<br />7. The largest manufacturing employer is the textile-carpet industry which employs over 100,000 workers and produces more than $2.5 billion in revenue annually.<br />8. There are over 700 textile companies headquartered in Georgia.<br />9. The mining industry of non fuel minerals produces $1.8 billion in income, and it employs over 9,000 workers.<br />10. Georgia’s clay production amounts to 24% of total U.S. production<br /><br /> The following companies are headquartered in Georgia:<br /><br />The Coca-Cola Company (KO) makes, delivers and sells non alcoholic beverages around the globe. The stock has a market cap of $102.17 billion, a PE of 18, a PEG of 1.61, and it pays a yield of 3.4%.<br /><br />United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is a parcel delivery firm, and it operates worldwide. The stock has a market cap of $50.95 billion, a PE of 247, a PEG of 1.36, and it pays a yield of 3.5%.<br /><br />Home Depot, Inc. (HD) is a retailer of home improvement products in North America. The stock has a market cap of $34.33 billion, a PE of 10, a PEG of 1.06, and it pays a yield of 4.5%.<br /><br />Southern Company (SO) produces and markets electricity in the south. The stock has a market cap of $25.79 billion. A PE of 15, a PEG of 2.74, and it pays a dividend of 5.2%.<br /><br />Aflac Incorporated (AFL) is a life and health insurance company in the United States and Japan. The stock has a market cap of $20.54 billion, a PE of 12, a PEG of 0.74, and it pays a yield of 2.3%.<br /><br />SunTrust Banks, Inc (STI) is a financial institution providing services to individuals and businesses in the United States. The stock has a market cap of $14.81 billion, a PE of 12, a PEG of 2.49, and it pays a yield of 7%.<br /><br />Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) is an investment management company providing management services in the United States. The stock has a market cap of $5.67 billion, a PE of 9, and it pays a yield of 1.4%.<br /><br />Oca Cola Enterprises, Inc. (CCE)  makes, distributes and sells nonalcoholic drinks. The stock has a market cap of $5.45 billion, a PEG of 1.27 and it pays a yield of 2.5%.<br /><br />Genuine Parts Company (GPC) is a distributor of industrial and automobile parts in North America. The stock has a market cap of $5.48 billion, a PE of 11, a PEG of 1.30, and it pays a yield of 5.0%.<br /><br />Intercontinental Exchange Inc. (ICE) is an online marketplace for the trading of securities and commodities. The stock has a market cap of $5.49 billion, a PE of 19, and a PEG of 0.67.<br /><br />Don't forget to check out the stocks from the states of <a href="http://stockerblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/wisconsin-stocks.html">Wisconsin</a>, <a href="http://stockerblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/louisiana-stocks.html">Louisiana</a>, <a href="http://stockerblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/michigan-stocks.html">Michigan</a>, and <a href="http://stockerblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/kentucky-stocks.html">Kentucky</a>. <br /><br /><i>Author owns UPS.</i><br /><br />By <a href="http://Stockerblog.com">Stockerblog.com</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><div class='adsense' style='0px 3px 0.5em 3px;'>



</div></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/georgia-stocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush Calls for ‘Smarter Government’</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/bush-calls-for-%e2%80%98smarter-government%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/bush-calls-for-%e2%80%98smarter-government%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Strategic and International Studies;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grant Aldonas;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Whitehead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lower Manhattan Development Corp;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Embargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smarter Government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Trade Center;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=8480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Really. It&#8217;s too much. Yesterday, <strong>George W. Bush </strong>told foreign leaders &#8220;Our aim should not be more government, It should be smarter government.&#8221; Didn&#8217;t Bush just spend the past eight years embodying the exact opposite? Where was the smart part creating an &#8220;ownership society&#8221; with phony money? Where was the smart part of running up record deficits? Or the war in Iraq?</p>
<p>- But W. didn&#8217;t stop there. Apart from wanting governments to be &#8220;smarter&#8221; (who doesn&#8217;t?), <a title="Open a new browser window to learn more." href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/13/bush-speaks-on-the-financ_n_143661.html" target="_blank">he called for called for leaders to recognize that &#8220;government intervention is not a cure-all&#8221; for economic problems</a>. So what was Fannie and Freddie all about? Or Hank Paulson&#8217;s Troubled Assets Relief Program. Or the bailout of AIG? If government is not a cure-all,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/bush-calls-for-%e2%80%98smarter-government%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush Calls for ‘Smarter Government’</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/bush-calls-for-%e2%80%98smarter-government%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/bush-calls-for-%e2%80%98smarter-government%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Strategic and International Studies;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grant Aldonas;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Whitehead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lower Manhattan Development Corp;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Embargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smarter Government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Trade Center;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=8480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Really. It&#8217;s too much. Yesterday, <strong>George W. Bush </strong>told foreign leaders &#8220;Our aim should not be more government, It should be smarter government.&#8221; Didn&#8217;t Bush just spend the past eight years embodying the exact opposite? Where was the smart part creating an &#8220;ownership society&#8221; with phony money? Where was the smart part of running up record deficits? Or the war in Iraq?</p>
<p>- But W. didn&#8217;t stop there. Apart from wanting governments to be &#8220;smarter&#8221; (who doesn&#8217;t?), <a title="Open a new browser window to learn more." href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/13/bush-speaks-on-the-financ_n_143661.html" target="_blank">he called for called for leaders to recognize that &#8220;government intervention is not a cure-all&#8221; for economic problems</a>. So what was Fannie and Freddie all about? Or Hank Paulson&#8217;s Troubled Assets Relief Program. Or the bailout of AIG? If government is not a cure-all,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/bush-calls-for-%e2%80%98smarter-government%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Recession Cycle Grips The Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-recession-cycle-grips-the-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-recession-cycle-grips-the-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britainâ;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas party;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama government;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=8448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Forget about the office Christmas party this year, says <strong><a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/bill-bonner/" class="alinks_links">Bill Bonner</a></strong>. That&#8217;s if you are lucky enough to still have a job. Throughout the country, businesses and households are cutting costs. And this is only the beginning. Bill says the Obama government will try to take up the slack in the economy. But that will just create more debt problems in the long term.</p>
<p>This from The <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com" class="alinks_links">Daily Reckoning</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>â€œBalloon bursts on festive parties in tough times,â€ is a headline at the Financial Times. Companies are cutting back sharply on their holiday celebrations. We know that from personal experience. A memo just received from corporate headquarters in Baltimore tells us that the annual Christmas party will be greatly scaled down. â€œEmployees only,â€&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/the-recession-cycle-grips-the-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheap on the Lows &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/cheap-on-the-lows-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/cheap-on-the-lows-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aes Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ensco Intl Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flowserve Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humana Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lilly Eli & Co;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manitowoc Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marathon Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nabors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble Corp;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nucor Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfizer Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockwell;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rowan Cos Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transocean Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyco Intl Ltd;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valero Energy;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viacom Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellpoint Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/15783/Cheap+on+the+Lows+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As the economy deteriorates, one of the first casualties will be corporate profits.  Earnings estimates have been falling very fast for 2009.  Recently estimate cuts for 2009 have been running at about 8x the number of estimate increases.  P/E-based valuations become tricky in such an environment -- you are shooting at a moving target.  One way around this is to focus on the low (or most pessimistic) estimate, rather than on the mean estimate.  Assume that everyone else will move to where the biggest pessimist is now. This is not to say that the most pessimistic analyst today can't be too optimistic, but at least he will be closer than most. On this basis, there are some very compelling values out there.  </p>
<p>Below we present a list of the cheapest S&#038;P 500 companies based on 2009 low estimates.  Since I simply do not trust the numbers, I have excluded from the list all firms from the financial sector.  However, I would note that we classify the health insurance companies under health care, and not among the financials.  I kept those names on the list, however there is substantial reason to be worried that their portfolios have lots of toxic assets in them just as life or P&#038;C insurance companies.  Use this list as a starting point to scout for values, not as a blind buy list.  </p>
<p>We have eliminated all firms with Zacks ranks of 4 or 5 ("sell" or "strong sell").  The change in estimate column refers to the mean estimate, not the low estimate, but as you can see the estimates have been coming down for most of these firms, often falling quite sharply.  </p>
<p>Still if the low estimate holds, these firms look like fairly compelling values.  All have P/E's based on their low estimates of below 8, and several provide very nice dividend yields to reward you while you wait for economic conditions to improve. </p>
<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#a2d39c">
<td align="left" width="20%"><b><u>Company </u></b></td>
<td align="center" width="13.3%"><b><u>Ticker </u></b></td>
<td align="center" width="13.3%"><b><u>Stock<br />Price </u></b></td>
<td align="center" width="13.3%"><b><u>Low EPS<br />Estimate </u></b></td>
<td align="center" width="13.3%"><b><u>2009 P/E<br />Low Est </u></b></td>
<td align="center" width="13.3%"><b><u>Zacks<br />Rank </u></b></td>
<td align="center" width="13.3%"><b><u>Div<br />Yield </u></b></td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Manitowoc Inc </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=MTW">MTW</a> </td>
<td align="center">$8.70 </td>
<td align="center">$2.30 </td>
<td align="center">3.78 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.92% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Massey Egy Cpy </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=MEE">MEE</a> </td>
<td align="center">$18.14 </td>
<td align="center">$4.45 </td>
<td align="center">4.08 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">1.10% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Noble Corp </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=NE">NE</a> </td>
<td align="center">$28.32 </td>
<td align="center">$5.75 </td>
<td align="center">4.93 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.56% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Memc Elec Matrl </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=WFR">WFR</a> </td>
<td align="center">$17.74 </td>
<td align="center">$3.43 </td>
<td align="center">5.17 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.00% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Rowan Cos Inc </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=RDC">RDC</a> </td>
<td align="center">$18.00 </td>
<td align="center">$3.43 </td>
<td align="center">5.25 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">2.22% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Transocean Inc </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=RIG">RIG</a> </td>
<td align="center">$75.85 </td>
<td align="center">$14.30 </td>
<td align="center">5.3 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.00% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Ensco Intl Inc </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=ESV">ESV</a> </td>
<td align="center">$34.50 </td>
<td align="center">$6.00 </td>
<td align="center">5.75 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.29% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Rockwell Automt </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=ROK">ROK</a> </td>
<td align="center">$24.65 </td>
<td align="center">$4.00 </td>
<td align="center">6.16 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">4.71% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Peabody Energy </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=BTU">BTU</a> </td>
<td align="center">$27.83 </td>
<td align="center">$4.50 </td>
<td align="center">6.18 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.86% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Humana Inc New </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=HUM">HUM</a> </td>
<td align="center">$34.93 </td>
<td align="center">$5.60 </td>
<td align="center">6.24 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.00% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Harman Intl Ind </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=HAR">HAR</a> </td>
<td align="center">$17.06 </td>
<td align="center">$2.65 </td>
<td align="center">6.44 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.29% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Natl Oilwell Vr </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=NOV">NOV</a> </td>
<td align="center">$27.72 </td>
<td align="center">$4.25 </td>
<td align="center">6.52 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.00% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#a2d39c">
<td align="left" width="20%"><b><u>Tyco Intl Ltd </u></b></td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=TYC">TYC</a> </td>
<td align="center">$23.95 </td>
<td align="center">$3.65 </td>
<td align="center">6.56 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">3.34% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Nabors Ind </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=NBR">NBR</a> </td>
<td align="center">$14.92 </td>
<td align="center">$2.25 </td>
<td align="center">6.63 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.00% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Nucor Corp </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=NUE">NUE</a> </td>
<td align="center">$32.92 </td>
<td align="center">$4.85 </td>
<td align="center">6.79 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">3.89% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Pfizer Inc </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=PFE">PFE</a> </td>
<td align="center">$16.37 </td>
<td align="center">$2.40 </td>
<td align="center">6.82 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">7.82% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Wellpoint Inc </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=WLP">WLP</a> </td>
<td align="center">$38.02 </td>
<td align="center">$5.55 </td>
<td align="center">6.85 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.00% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Valero Energy </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=VLO">VLO</a> </td>
<td align="center">$18.66 </td>
<td align="center">$2.67 </td>
<td align="center">6.99 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">3.22% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Forest Labs A </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=FRX">FRX</a> </td>
<td align="center">$23.38 </td>
<td align="center">$3.33 </td>
<td align="center">7.02 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.00% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Precision Castp </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=PCP">PCP</a> </td>
<td align="center">$55.12 </td>
<td align="center">$7.85 </td>
<td align="center">7.02 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.22% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Embarq </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=EQ">EQ</a> </td>
<td align="center">$30.20 </td>
<td align="center">$4.28 </td>
<td align="center">7.06 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">9.11% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Flowserve Corp </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=FLS">FLS</a> </td>
<td align="center">$51.25 </td>
<td align="center">$7.25 </td>
<td align="center">7.07 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">1.95% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Utd States Stl </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=X">X</a> </td>
<td align="center">$32.21 </td>
<td align="center">$4.50 </td>
<td align="center">7.16 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">3.73% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Constellatn Brd </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=STZ">STZ</a> </td>
<td align="center">$12.48 </td>
<td align="center">$1.74 </td>
<td align="center">7.17 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.00% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Aes Corp </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=AES">AES</a> </td>
<td align="center">$6.61 </td>
<td align="center">$0.90 </td>
<td align="center">7.34 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.00% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Hewlett Packard </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=HPQ">HPQ</a> </td>
<td align="center">$33.64 </td>
<td align="center">$4.55 </td>
<td align="center">7.39 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.95% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Darden Restrnt </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=DRI">DRI</a> </td>
<td align="center">$20.35 </td>
<td align="center">$2.68 </td>
<td align="center">7.59 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">3.93% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Unitedhealth Gp </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=UNH">UNH</a> </td>
<td align="center">$22.16 </td>
<td align="center">$2.90 </td>
<td align="center">7.64 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.14% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Limited Inc </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=LTD">LTD</a> </td>
<td align="center">$10.41 </td>
<td align="center">$1.35 </td>
<td align="center">7.71 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">5.76% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Marathon Oil Cp </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=MRO">MRO</a> </td>
<td align="center">$28.02 </td>
<td align="center">$3.60 </td>
<td align="center">7.78 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">3.43% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Viacom Inc Cl B </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=VIA.B">VIA.B</a> </td>
<td align="center">$18.56 </td>
<td align="center">$2.35 </td>
<td align="center">7.9 </td>
<td align="center">3 </td>
<td align="center">0.00% </td></tr>
<tr bgcolor="#e6f3e7">
<td align="left">Lilly Eli &#038; Co </td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=main&#038;t=LLY">LLY</a> </td>
<td align="center">$32.87 </td>
<td align="center">$4.15 </td>
<td align="center">7.92 </td>
<td align="center">2 </td>
<td align="center">5.72% </td></tr></tbody></table><a href="http://www.zacks.com" alt="Investment Research">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/cheap-on-the-lows-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama Hedge Fund Link Fest</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-hedge-funds/barack-obama-hedge-fund-link-fest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-hedge-funds/barack-obama-hedge-fund-link-fest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard C. Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hedge Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama Hedge Fund Link Fest;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama Hedge Fund;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance/investment industry;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas  pump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedge Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intricate web;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jimmy carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Hedge Fund;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Link Fest;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sufficient health insurance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-125009547106294711.post-2227560110245762737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<h1><b>Obama Link Fest<br /></b></h1><h2><b><span style="rgb(102, 0, 0);">Barack Obama Hedge Fund Link Fest</span></b></h2><br /><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wM_OZdOMR_Y/SRHOEx1XwTI/AAAAAAAACgA/QXxK4s--_FA/s200/Barack-Obama-Hedge-Funds.jpg"><img style="186px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wM_OZdOMR_Y/SRHOEx1XwTI/AAAAAAAACgA/QXxK4s--_FA/s200/Barack-Obama-Hedge-Funds.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>(http://HedgeFundBlogger.com)  I have received many congratulatory emails over the past day from hedge fund/investment professionals in India, Switzerland, London and Singapore all thankful that Obama was elected.  I found that interesting in itself and also saw a flood of articles come out discussing Barack Obama and the hedge fund industry, or Obama and the finance/investment industry in general.<br /><br />Yesterday I published this piece: <span style="rgb(0, 0, 0);"><a href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/2008/11/barack-obama-hedge-funds-long-term.html" title="Barack Obama &#38; Hedge Funds &#124; The Long-Term Impact">Barack Obama &#38; Hedge Funds</a>... </span>Here are excerpts and links to many of these discussions:<br /><br />(I never discuss my own political views through this site throwing my opinion around regarding <a href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/2008/03/hedge-funds.html">hedge funds</a> is enough. I don't support any of these articles one way or another but simply provide them as an aggregation of what has been put out there over the last few days.)<br /><br /><span style="bold;">1) An excerpt from a story in the New York Times followed with commentary from my <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://fintag.com/">Mr. Fintag</a>.</span><br /><br />Today's economic turmoil, it seems, is an implicit indictment of the arcane field of financial engineering — a blend of mathematics, statistics and computing. Its practitioners devised not only the exotic, mortgage-backed securities that proved so troublesome, but also the mathematical models of risk that suggested these securities were safe.<br /><br />What happened?<br /><br />The models, according to finance experts and economists, did fail to keep pace with the explosive growth in complex securities, the resulting intricate web of risk and the dimensions of the danger. <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/05/business/05risk.html?_r=1&#38;scp=5&#38;sq=hedge+funds&#38;st=nyt&#38;oref=slogin">Read more of this story...</a><br /><br /><span style="bold;">Fintag says</span><br />My Obama mentor, now a Hedge Fund grandee living the high life in retirement told me many things. Spelling is for wimps is one but the other was never invest or trade more than 6 things at once. Now this is a little tricky when most funds are not allowed 20% concentration, but he was right. Many hedge funds boast about turnover and the number of positions in the Greg Coffey style of trading. It never works.<br /><br />Again, we can blame spreadsheet jockeys and quants who always forget that humans are irrational and rational at the same time. Irrationally rational.<br /><br />All of us are excited Obama is US president because he has a different skin configuration (if I hear another commentator say he is black ...it is wrong and totally irrelevant). We are being irrationally rational and how could any quant model or risk management process capture this?<br /><br />That is why I love the markets. People trying to find certainty out of chaos and gamblers finding chaos in certainty.<br />_________________________<br /><br />2) <span style="bold;">Financial Times Alphaville published this piece:</span><br /><br />The industry has donated over $1m to Obama’s campaign, according to OpenSecrets (small change to a <a title="hedge fund managers, hedge fund manager" href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/2007/10/hedge-fund-managers-pedigree.html">hedge fund manager</a>, perhaps, but it still makes Obama the biggest recipient of the industry’s largesse this year — and is nearly double what rival presidential candidate John McCain received).<br /><br />But despite the contributions, Obama’s taken a somewhat hostile stance towards the barrons of Mayfair and Stamford. Notably, he accused McCain of being the candidate of ‘Joe the Hedge Fund Manager’ as opposed to all-American blue-collar hero “Joe the Plumber.” <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/11/05/17866/hedge-funds-yes-we-can/">Source</a><br /><br /><span style="bold;">3) FinanceAsia.com published this piece:</span><br /><br />There are several reasons that Barack Obama won the US presidential election. He won because the economy is shockingly bad. He won for his campaign promise of “change”. He won because – unlike John McCain – he was in no way tied to the Bush administration, which has been roundly blamed for the economic disaster in which the USA is currently mired.<br /><br />Think about it: under Republican rule, wages – for those who have work (and often more than one job) – have flat-lined. The national debt has doubled from what it was when Bush took office and is fast approaching $10 trillion. Meanwhile, prices at the gas pump have skyrocketed, alongside the price of milk and eggs. Unemployment recently surpassed 6% – the highest level since the early 1990s – and approximately 47 million Americans have no health insurance. Do not even think about dwelling on mortgage defaults; unless your heart can take it, or you have sufficient health insurance, that is. No wonder 64% of America’s eligible voters went to the polls.<br /><br />And no wonder Obama capitalised on former Republican President Ronald Reagan’s famous question to voters in 1980: “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” For most Americans in 2008, the answer is an absolute “No”. But now the president-elect faces a tougher question: Can Obama fix what ails the nation? <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.financeasia.com/article.aspx?CIaNID=88369">Read more...</a><br /><br />4) <span style="bold;">Finalternatives published this piece:</span><br /><br />Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) won a decisive and historic victory, becoming the first African-American to win the U.S. presidency.<br /><br />The Illinois senator, who just four years ago was a state senator in the Land of Lincoln, became the first Democratic candidate since Jimmy Carter in 1976 to win an outright majority of votes cast, winning such traditionally Republican states as Indiana and Virginia, both of which had last given their electoral votes to a Democrat in 1964. Obama was buoyed in no small part by the ongoing financial crisis, which he successful pinned on the policies of the incumbent Republican president, George W. Bush, and his supporters in Congress, including Obama’s rival for the presidency, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).<br /><br />Obama, who enjoyed the substantial financial backing of the <a href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/">hedge fund</a> industry and many of its top players, has taken a bellicose tone with the industry on the campaign trail. Notably, he derisively riffed on McCain as the candidate of “<span style="rgb(0, 0, 0);"><a href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/2008/10/joe-hedge-fund-manager-not-joe-plumber.html" title="Joe The Hedge Fund Manager &#124; Not Joe The Plumber">Joe The Hedge Fund Manager</a></span>.” McCain staked much of his late campaign on trying to win over the “Joe the Plumbers” of the electorate. <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.finalternatives.com/node/5979">Source</a><br /><br />5) Dealbook put out this piece:<br /><br />The state of Connecticut went for Barack Obama in Tuesday’s election, as did Fairfield county, which is home to Greenwich — a major hub of the hedge fund industry — as well as many hedge fund managers and Wall Street executives.<br /><br />But while the county as a whole voted in favor of the Democratic presidential candidate, giving him 59 percent of the vote, some of the well-heeled towns in the county where many of those hedge funds and <a title="High Net Worth Investors" href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/2008/03/high-net-worth-investors.html">high net worth</a> Wall Street types are concentrated swung in favor of his Republican challenger, Senator John McCain. <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/05/obama-in-hedge-fund-land/">Read more...</a><br /><h4>Related to Barack Obama and the Hedge Fund Industry:</h4><ul><li><a title="Hedge Fund New York" href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/2008/03/hedge-fund-new-york.html"><span style="rgb(0, 0, 0);"></span></a><span style="rgb(0, 0, 0);"><a href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/2008/10/joe-hedge-fund-manager-not-joe-plumber.html" title="Joe The Hedge Fund Manager &#124; Not Joe The Plumber">Joe The Hedge Fund Manager &#124; Not Joe The Plumber</a></span></li><li><a title="Connecticut Hedge Fund Guide" href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/2008/09/connecticut-hedge-fund-guide.html"><span style="rgb(0, 0, 0);"></span></a><span style="rgb(0, 0, 0);"><a href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/2008/11/barack-obama-hedge-funds-long-term.html" title="Barack Obama &#38; Hedge Funds &#124; The Long-Term Impact">Barack Obama &#38; Hedge Funds &#124; The Long-Term Impact</a></span></li><li><a href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/2008/08/geographical-guide-to-hedge-funds.html" title="hedge fund guides">Geographical Guides </a></li><li><a href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/2008/10/cayman-island-hedge-fund-guide-hedge.html" title="Cayman Island Hedge Fund Guide &#124; Hedge Funds in the Cayman Islands"><span style="rgb(0, 0, 0);"></span></a><a href="http://richard-wilson.blogspot.com/2008/10/washington-dc-hedge-fund-guide-guide-to.html" title="Washington D.C. Hedge Fund Guide &#124; Guide to Hedge Funds in DC">Washington D.C. Hedge Fund Guide<br /></a></li></ul>Tags: Barack Obama Hedge Fund, Hedge Funds Barack Obama, Obama Hedge Fund, Hedge Fund Taxation Obama, Capital Gains Tax and Barack Obama, Capital Gains Tax<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/richard-wilson-blog?a=8frHn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/richard-wilson-blog?i=8frHn" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/richard-wilson-blog?a=qGcSN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/richard-wilson-blog?i=qGcSN" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/richard-wilson-blog?a=8e0xn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/richard-wilson-blog?i=8e0xn" border="0"/></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/richard-wilson-blog/~4/444429883" height="1"/>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-hedge-funds/barack-obama-hedge-fund-link-fest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MARKET COMMENT October 1, 2008 &#8220;I couldn&#8217;t have gotten this deal six months ago,&#8221; so says Warren Buffett regarding his GE score.</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/market-comment-october-1-2008-i-couldnt-have-gotten-this-deal-six-months-ago-so-says-warren-buffett-regarding-his-ge-score/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/market-comment-october-1-2008-i-couldnt-have-gotten-this-deal-six-months-ago-so-says-warren-buffett-regarding-his-ge-score/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Fry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange Traded Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy tax incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington DC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etfdigest.com/daveDaily.php?id=677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ MARKET COMMENT October 1, 2008 &#8220;I couldn&#8217;t have gotten this deal six months ago,&#8221; so says Warren Buffett regarding his GE score. Perhaps one might add, &#8220;&#8230;and you never will either, so bug out!&#8221; The gang at CNBC is pretty excited to have him as an owner. I wonder if they&#8217;ll give him his own show.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/investing-in-exchange-traded-funds/market-comment-october-1-2008-i-couldnt-have-gotten-this-deal-six-months-ago-so-says-warren-buffett-regarding-his-ge-score/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Election and Your Money</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/the-election-and-your-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/the-election-and-your-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=12467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent elections have revolved around issues of great importance to investors and consumers that are still, well, at issue. Although tax rates, health insurance, and the future of Social Security and Medicare dominated campaign rhetoric in 2004 and 2006, voters are still waiting for a clear direction on these matters.
But in this yearâ€™s election, there [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/small-cap-and-micro-cap-stocks/the-election-and-your-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beijing Demands Dividends; Eight Chinese ADRs &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/beijing-demands-dividends-eight-chinese-adrs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/beijing-demands-dividends-eight-chinese-adrs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nilus Mattive</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aluminum Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical producer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicken products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Securities Regulatory Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuous and steady long-term dividend  systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin D. Weiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martin weiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meat products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Larson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil And Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Securities and Exchange  Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.moneyandmarkets.com://b9709c266c8c9380c42bd062c297217b</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The China Securities Regulatory Commission — Beijing's equivalent of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — is pressing the country's listed companies to adopt more ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/beijing-demands-dividends-eight-chinese-adrs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympic Stocks</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/olympic-stocks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/olympic-stocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Fuld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Market News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing 2008 Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coca Cola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital imaging products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exclusive Suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous beverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Fuld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson & Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenovo Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Edward Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23020893.post-192051519157207863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2008 Summer Olympics are here, and there are several publicly traded companies that are official Worldwide Olympic Sponsors. If you think that being connected to the Olympics can help these companies, it may be worth taking a closer look at these stocks.<br /><br />Coca Cola (KO) is the famous beverage company. The stock has a PE of 22 , a PEG of 1.9 and pays a yield of  2.70% .<br /><br />General Electric (GE) the conglomerate involved in technology, media, and financial services. The stock has a PE of 14 , a PEG of 1.22 and pays a yield of  4.20% .<br /><br />Johnson &#038; Johnson (JNJ) famous for its Bandaids, makes and markets various health care products. The stock has a PE of 17 , a PEG of 1.98 and pays a yield of  2.60% .<br /><br />Kodak (EK) makes and sells photography and digital imaging products. The stock has a PE of 8 , a PEG of 9.59 and pays a yield of  3% .<br /><br />Lenovo Group (LNVGY.PK) makes and sells technology products and services. The stock has a PE of 13    and pays a yield of  4.70% .<br /><br />Manulife (MFC) is a life, group life and health insurance company. The stock has a PE of 14 , a PEG of 0.96 and pays a yield of  2.80% .<br /><br />McDonalds (MCD) is the operator of McDonalds fast food restaurants. The stock has a PE of 17 , a PEG of 1.57 and pays a yield of  2.30% .<br /><br />Visa (V) is the credit card processing company. The stock has a PE of 27 , a PEG of 1.42 and pays a yield of  0.60% .<br /><br />If you want an Excel database of all the publicly traded Worldwide Olympic Sponsors, along with the Sponsors, Exclusive Suppliers, and Beijing 2008 Partners, a total of 18 stocks, go to <a href="http://WallStreetNewsNetwork.com">WallStreetNewsNetwork.com</a>.<br /><br /><em>Author owns KO, MCD, and V.</em><br /><br />By Fred Fuld at <a href="http://Stockerblog.com">Stockerblog.com</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><div class='adsense' style='text-align:center; padding: 0px 3px 0.5em 3px;'>
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client="ca-pub-2427831169011625";
google_ad_width=300;
google_ad_height=250;
google_ad_format="300x250_as";
google_ad_type="text";
google_ad_channel ="8681602088";
google_color_border="FFF3DB";
google_color_bg="FFF3DB";
google_color_link="1B0431";
google_color_url="1B0431";
google_color_text="29303B";
//--></script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/olympic-stocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MedeFile International Inc. (MDFI.OB) Offers Safer Alternative to Google Health</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/medefile-international-inc-mdfiob-offers-safer-alternative-to-google-health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/medefile-international-inc-mdfiob-offers-safer-alternative-to-google-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QualityStocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Market News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTCBB Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small & Micro Cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance Portability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance Portability And Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance Portability And Accountability Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance Portability And Accountability Act Hip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Loophole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance Solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mdfi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medefile International Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace Of Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Medical Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Record Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Breaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Solution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Blog.QualityStocks.net/?p=10499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Google Health offers people the ability to organize their health records. However, many people are extremely skeptical of claims made by a company with a history of brushing security vulnerabilities under the rug. Do you really want to trust a huge corporation with the privacy of your personal medical data, especially when its integrity in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/medefile-international-inc-mdfiob-offers-safer-alternative-to-google-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the Fed Cut in September?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/will-the-fed-cut-in-september/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/will-the-fed-cut-in-september/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trader Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Market News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ex-food energy measure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smithfield Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyson Foods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/will-the-fed-cut-in-september/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a bit bemused by the government Consumer Price Index (CPI) and everyone screaming their is no inflation in the economy.
Anyone who has bought a house, went grocery shopping, went to the hospital without health insurance, sent a kid to college, bought gas, or paid for heat or A/C for their house in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/will-the-fed-cut-in-september/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
