<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stock Market News &#38; Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks &#187; Fortune Brands Inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.straightstocks.com/tag/fortune-brands-inc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.straightstocks.com</link>
	<description>Leading Stock Market News, Opinions and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:35:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fortune Sells Cobra Golf to Puma &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/fortune-sells-cobra-golf-to-puma-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/fortune-sells-cobra-golf-to-puma-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cobra brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endorsement contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footwear apparel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puma ag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Investment Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/31500/Fortune+Sells+Cobra+Golf+to+Puma+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>Fortune Brands Inc</strong>. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/FO">FO</a>), a leading consumer brands company, recently sold its Cobra golf brand, including its related inventory, intellectual property, and endorsement contracts to Puma AG, a German multinational company that produces high-end athletic shoes, lifestyle footwear and other sportswear.<br />
 <br />
With the sale, Fortune Brands intends to concentrate its golf business on its leading brands &#8211; Titleist and FootJoy. While Titleist is the numero uno ball in golf, FootJoy is the leading brand in golf shoes and gloves. Titleist, the flagship golf club brand of Fortune Brands, generated the lion&#8217;s share of sales in the golf club category and registered strong sales in 2009, when the overall golf club market declined due to the global recession.<br />
 <br />
The acquisition of the Cobra brand would enable Puma to provide a full range of products in the golf category, including golf equipment, footwear, apparel and accessories. Fortune Brands will continue to provide production, distribution, field sales and customer service to Puma during the transition period until the completion of the transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.<br />
 <br />
Although the financial terms were not disclosed, Fortune Brands anticipates the sale to be dilutive by approximately two cents to 2010 earnings per share before a one-time gain on sale of approximately five cents. The transaction is expected to be completed by the second quarter of fiscal 2010.<br />
 <br /><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=FO">Read the full analyst report on "FO"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/fortune-sells-cobra-golf-to-puma-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fortune Tops, Guidance Falls &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/fortune-tops-guidance-falls-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/fortune-tops-guidance-falls-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brands;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus Estimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Per Share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golf businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incremental costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Beam;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarter;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rsquo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/29956/Fortune+Tops%2C+Guidance+Falls+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fortune Brands Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fo">FO</a>) reported fourth quarter results before the opening bell today. The company swung to a net income of $11.5 million from a net loss of $281.3 million in the year-ago quarter. Excluding special items, earnings per share came in at 66 cents, which topped the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 51 cents derived from 9 covering analysts.</p>
<p>However, the company offered a conservative outlook for 2010 and said that it expects EPS of $2.30 to $2.80 per share, which is below the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.89 per share derived from 12 covering analysts. Fortune Brands also stated that earnings for the first quarter of 2010 is expected to be lower compared to the year-ago period due to higher brand investment in the Spirits business and incremental costs associated with restructuring efforts.</p>
<p>The Zacks Consensus Estimate on the company&#8217;s earnings for the first quarter is currently pegged at 46 cents per share, which reduced by 7 cents over the past month as 1 of 6 covering analysts lowered expectations.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, net sales for the fourth quarter of 2009 grew slightly to $1.80 billion from $1.79 billion in the year-ago quarter, primarily due to growth in Spirits and Golf businesses. However, the top-line increase was partially offset by revenues declines in Fortune Brands&#8217; Home Products business.</p>
<p>Home Products declined 3.3% to $823.8 million as Fortune Brands continued to face the adverse impact of conservative spending by consumers on big-ticket discretionary items. However, the company witnessed improved results in Moen and Simonton brands, which helped moderate the sales decline in this segment.</p>
<p>Fortune Brands&#8217; Spirits division recorded a growth of 3.5% year-over-year to $746.4 million, mainly driven by improved performance by Jim Beam and Maker&#8217;s Mark brands in the U.S, which more than offset sluggishness in certain international markets. Moreover, the segment&#8217;s sales also benefitted from favorable foreign currency translations.</p>
<p>The Golf segment rose by 6.9% to $226.9 million as Fortune Brands outperformed the industry with double-digit sales increases for Titleist golf balls and FootJoy shoes coupled with solid performance in Asian markets.</p>
<p>At the end of the quarter, Fortune Brands had cash and cash equivalents of $417.2 million and long-term debt of $4.4 billion, compared to $163.3 million of cash and $4.7 billion of long-term debt in the year-ago period. During 2009, the company generated free cash flow of $724.7 million, compared to $691.5 million in the year-ago period. For 2010, Fortune Brands expects free cash flow to range between $375 million and $475 million.</p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=FO">Read the full analyst report on "FO"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/fortune-tops-guidance-falls-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tough Q3 for Fortune Brands &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/tough-q3-for-fortune-brands-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/tough-q3-for-fortune-brands-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruzan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overall home products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/26390/Tough+Q3+for+Fortune+Brands+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />
<strong>Fortune Brands Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fo">FO</a>) reported third quarter earnings of 82 cents per share. Although earnings were well above the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 63 cents, they were down 59.8% year-over-year.<br />
<br />
Net sales for the quarter declined 10.6% year-over-year to $1.72 billion, primarily due to flat sales for the company&#8217;s spirits business and comparatively moderate revenue declines in the golf and home products brands.<br />
<br />
The Spirits segment revenues were flat during the quarter, as higher sales of Jim Beam bourbon and Canadian Club whisky, the Cruzan acquisition and strong growth in emerging markets was almost fully offset by soft results in other international markets. In addition, a benefit from the company&#8217;s route-to-market initiatives was largely offset by unfavorable foreign exchange.<br />
<br />
There are signs that the U.S. housing downturn is decelerating, which coupled with the company&#8217;s share-gain initiatives across all product categories helped moderate the sales decline in the home products business compared to the prior two quarters.<br />
<br />
In the golf segment, the company outperformed the industry with successful new products and double-digit constant-currency sales gains in Europe and Korea which were partially offset by a double-digit decrease in the U.S.<br />
<br />
Cash flow from operations at the end of the quarter was $382.3 million and the company had a debt-to-capitalization ratio of 47%.<br />
<br />
Based on the results year-to-date, management raised the low end of the earnings target. The company now expects annual earnings in the range of $2.10 to $2.30 compared to the previous target of $2.00-2.30. Although, the moderate declines in the home and golf product categories are encouraging, management expects consumers to remain cautious in the months ahead.<br />
<br />
Also, the overall home products market -- particularly big-ticket remodeling purchases -- are expected to be challenging in 2010. The company reaffirmed its free cash flow guidance of $400 million.<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#038;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#038;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#038;t=FO">Read the full analyst report on "FO"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com" alt="Investment Research">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/tough-q3-for-fortune-brands-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DrStockPick.com Stock Report! 8/17/09, FO, PETD, HTZ, SXI, SPNG, RGR</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-81709-fo-petd-htz-sxi-spng-rgr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-81709-fo-petd-htz-sxi-spng-rgr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stock Pick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acushnet Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automoti Group Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Stock Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hertz Global Holdings Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major League Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Football League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petroleum Development Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail chains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail demand;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruger & Company Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruger & Company;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shalov Stone Bonner & Rocco LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpongeTech Delivery Systems Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpongeTechs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standex International Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sturm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States District Court for the  District of Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drstockpick.com/?p=2777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
DrStockPick.com Stock  Report!

Monday August 17, 2009




**************************************************************

Acushnet Company, the golf  business of Fortune Brands, Inc. (NYSE: FO), announced that on  August 14, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit  granted the company&#8217;s request for a new trial and issued other favorable  decisions in its patent dispute with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/drstockpick-com-stock-report-81709-fo-petd-htz-sxi-spng-rgr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Big Was the Housing ATM? &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/how-big-was-the-housing-atm-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/how-big-was-the-housing-atm-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amir Sufi;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atif Mian;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.R. Horton Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lower government services;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing presses working overtime;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the University of Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whirlpool Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/20186/How+Big+Was+the+Housing+ATM%3F+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style: italic;">Highlights include D.R. Horton, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/dhi">DHI</a>), Whirlpool Corp. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/whr">WHR</a>) and Fortune Brands, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fo">FO</a>).</span><br /><br /><a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1397607" target="_self">A recent academic paper</a> by Atif Mian and Amir Sufi, both of the University of Chicago and the NBER, took a very close look at the effect of mortgage equity withdrawal on the overall economy during the housing bubble. "Mortgage equity withdrawal" is the more technical name for the housing ATM.<br /><br />It was very actively pushed by the banks during the housing bubble, with ads showing money hidden in people's houses that they were not taking advantage of. I knew it was significant, but this paper indicates that it was even more important than I thought it was. Here is an abstract from the paper:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">"Using individual-level data on homeowner debt and defaults from 1997 to 2008, we show that borrowing against the increase in home equity by existing homeowners is responsible for a significant fraction of both the sharp rise in U.S. household leverage from 2002 to 2006 and the increase in defaults from 2006 to 2008.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">"Employing land topology-based housing supply elasticity as an instrument for house price growth, we estimate that the average homeowner extracts 25 to 30 cents for every dollar increase in home equity. Money extracted from increased home equity is not used to purchase new real estate or pay down high credit card debt, which suggests that consumption is a likely use of borrowed funds.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">"Home equity-based borrowing is stronger for younger households, households with low credit scores, and households with high initial credit card utilization rates. Homeowners in high house price appreciation areas experience a relative decline in default rates from 2002 to 2006 as they borrow heavily against their home equity, but experience very high default rates from 2006 to 2008.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">"Our estimates suggest that home equity-based borrowing is equal to 2.3% of GDP every year from 2002 to 2006, and accounts for over 20% of new defaults in the last two years."</span><br /><br />This is a much higher flow-through from the wealth effect of rising home values than is normally assumed, with most economists having modeled it at less than $0.10 on the dollar rather than over $0.25. It is not surprising that when house prices are rising quickly that default rates fall -- after all, if the borrower gets in trouble, he can always just sell the house.<br /><br />The 2.3% of GDP each year is stunning, since it accounts for nearly all of the economic growth the country experienced from 2002 through 2006 (real GDP growth averaged 2.68% in those years, inclusive). Put another way, if we didn't have growth due to the housing bubble, we would have hardly had any growth at all.<br /><br />This data does seem to correspond to the data showing no increase in median income over the period. It also explains why it is not just people who bought their houses near the top who are in trouble right now.<br /><br />Historically, Residential Investment (RI) has been the primary driver to lead the economy out of a recession. A housing recovery obviously helps homebuilders like <span style="font-weight: bold;">D.R. Horton</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/dhi">DHI</a>) and those that supply it like <span style="font-weight: bold;">Whirlpool </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/whr">WHR</a>) and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Fortune Brands</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fo">FO</a>).<br /><br />The equity extraction helped support just about every part of the consumer based economy. With foreclosures still on the rise and a huge inventory of houses (both new and used) still out there, it is hard to see RI lifting the economy this time around. RI has already shrunk to its smallest percentage of GDP on record (after being at near record highs just a few years ago), so it might not fall that much further.<br /><br />While it is true that an absence of a negative is a positive, it will not provide very much power for the economy. Right now, the most likely scenario is that the economy stops falling, but then bumps along the bottom for a very long time. This will not be a V shaped recovery, at best it will be a very broad-bottomed U. Zombie banks could turn it into an L, otherwise known as "turning Japanese" (not to be confused with the new-wave pop song).<br /><br />This, then, implies a lower long-run growth rate of corporate profits coming out of the recession. That is something that would argue for lower P/E multiples for the market as a whole (although the currently very low interest rates argue for higher P/E multiples).<br /><br />The "end of the world" scenarios have, for the most part, been pulled off the table by very aggressive policy responses on both the fiscal (stimulus package, very large budget deficits) and monetary side (Fed funds near zero, printing presses working overtime). However, the most fundamental rule in all of economics is that there is no free lunch (except if you work on the buy side, and with the possible exception of improvements in efficiency).<br /><br />These responses have prevented the current economy from turning into an absolute disaster (the second Great Depression), but will come with a cost down the road. The debt we have taken on will have to be serviced and eventually repaid. This implies either higher taxes or lower government services, especially if economic growth is anemic.<br /><br />The huge expansion of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet substantially raises the risk of out-of-control inflation as the economy recovers (not happening now, but could be a huge 2011 or 2012 story).  
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=DHI">Read the full analyst report on "DHI"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/how-big-was-the-housing-atm-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fortune Brands Offers Outlook; Cuts Dividend &#8211; Zacks Tale of the Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/fortune-brands-offers-outlook-cuts-dividend-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/fortune-brands-offers-outlook-cuts-dividend-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Beam;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/19611/Fortune+Brands+Offers+Outlook%3B+Cuts+Dividend+-+Zacks+Tale+of+the+Tape</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Shares of <b>Fortune Brands Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/FO">FO</a>) have advanced more than 5% today after the owner of Jim Beam and Moen brands provided a better-than-expected first-quarter earnings preview. 
<p>The company expects first-quarter earnings of 30 cents per share, excluding items, which is higher than the lowered consensus estimate of 17 cents. </p>
<p>However, the company also reduced its annual dividend to 76 cents per share, compared to $1.76 earlier. The initiative will enable the company retain an additional $110 million over the remainder of 2009 and $150 million on an annualized basis. </p>
<p>Analysts on average have reduced full-year earnings estimates, pulling the consensus lower by 4 cents over the past 60 days to $2.23 per share. </p>
<p>FO, a Zacks #4 Rank ("Sell") stock, is trading on higher than-usual-volume of 3 million, compared to average volume of about 2.7 million. </p>
<p></p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZRANK&#38;t=FO">"FO" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/fortune-brands-offers-outlook-cuts-dividend-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Home Sales Stabilize &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/new-home-sales-stabilize-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/new-home-sales-stabilize-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.R. Horton Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lennar Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masco Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weyerhaeuser Co;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/19499/New+Home+Sales+Stabilize+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Highlights include Lennar Corp. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/len">LEN</a>), D.R. Horton, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/dhi">DHI</a>), Weyerhaeuser Co. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wy">WY</a>), Masco Corp. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mas">MAS</a>) and Fortune Brands, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fo">FO</a>).</em><br />
<br />
New home sales fell just 0.6% in March from an upwardly revised February sales pace. However, at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of just 356,000, it was still the worst March since records of new home sales started in 1962.<br />
<br />
Nationwide, on a year-over-year basis, new home sales are down 30.6% -- and remember the slide in new home sales did not start a year ago. From the peak in mid-2005, new home sales are down almost 75% (see graph below; larger version available at: <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/">http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/</a>).<br />
<br />
Regionally the results were very mixed (the regional numbers have extremely large standard errors, so take all of them with a grain of salt). In the Northeast, sales plunged 32.1% for the month, and were down an identical 32.1% on a year-over-year basis.  At the other end of the spectrum was the West, where sales were up 15.1% for the month, but are down 31.1% on a year-over-year basis. In between were the Midwest (-7.8% for the month and down 32.9% year over year) and the super-important South region (0.0% for the month and -29.7% year over year). In March, the South represented 57.9% of all new home sales.<br />
<br />
<img src="/images/upload_dir/1240591375bmp" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Perhaps the best news in the report is the decline in inventories, which were down 5.2% on the month and are down 33.7% on a year-over-year basis. This drove the months supply down to 10.7 months from 11.2 months both last month and a year ago.<br />
<br />
As shown in the second graph (also from <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/">http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/</a>), this is the first time the months supply has been lower on a year-over-year basis since before the bubble started to burst. It now appears that January&#8217;s 12.5 months may mark the peak in this very important metric.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, the months supply figure is still near the worst levels ever seen before the current downturn. This is happening with mortgage rates near historical lows, rather than in the high teens where they were in the 1980 and 1982 peaks of months supply.<br />
<br />
There was mixed news on the pricing front. The median price fell 3.5% on the month to $201,400, but was down 12.2% from $229,300 a year ago. The average price (mean) was up 1.1% to $258,000 on the month, but down 10.3% from the $287,600 level a year ago. Some of this is due to the mix of houses being sold.<br />
<br />
Both starter houses (less than $200,000) and McMansions (over $500,000) gained as a percentage of houses sold at the expense of the move-up home market for the month. In March, starter homes represented 49% of all houses sold, up from 45% in February. McMansions represented 8% up from 7%, while the move-up segment plunged to 43% from 49%. A year ago, starter houses represented just 37% of the market, while move-up houses represented 54%, with McMansions at 9%.<br />
<br />
 <img src="/images/upload_dir/1240591390bmp" alt="" /><br />
<br />
While it is certainly welcome news to see the months supply start to fall -- and for the market to hold above its disastrous January level of just 331,000 houses sold -- we are far from out of the woods on the housing front. New home sales are typically what leads the economy out of a recession (see first graph again). So far we are seeing a stabilization at best, not a rebound.<br />
<br />
There is another huge wave of foreclosures coming as the moratoriums were lifted at the end of March. These will find their way back onto the market and will continue to provide very stiff competition for new houses. At this point, I would simply ignore the major homebuilding stocks like <strong>Lennar</strong> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/len">LEN</a>) and <strong>D.R. Horton </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/dhi">DHI</a>), neither buying them nor shorting them.<br />
<br />
Until the months supply figure gets down to a more normal level of six to seven months, there is really no reason to see an upturn in construction activity. This means that there is no real upturn in sight for the major suppliers to the housing market, such as lumber companies like <strong>Weyerhaeuser </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wy">WY</a>) or other major suppliers like <strong>Masco </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mas">MAS</a>) and <strong>Fortune Brands </strong>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fo">FO</a>).<br />
<br />
All in all this was a mixed report on housing. It was not the disaster that we have become accustomed to seeing, but it was not the huge positive surprise like we saw in the February report.</p><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=DHI">Read the full analyst report on "DHI"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MAS">Read the full analyst report on "MAS"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/new-home-sales-stabilize-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zacks #5 Rank Additions for Thursday  &#8211; Zacks Tale of the Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-5-rank-additions-for-thursday-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-5-rank-additions-for-thursday-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zacks Market Commentaries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Axis Capital Holdings Ltd;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caterpillar Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBL & Associates Properties Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise GP Holdings LP;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equinix Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exterran holdings inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GATX Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genuine Parts Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ingram Micro Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interline Brands Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KB Financial Group Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyocera Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln National Corp.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porter Bancorp Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunstone Hotel Investors Inc;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Textainer Group Holdings Ltd;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner Inc.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/18986/Zacks+%235+Rank+Additions+for+Thursday++-+Zacks+Tale+of+the+Tape</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left">Here are the stocks added to the Zacks #5 Rank ("strong sell") List today:<br /></p>
<ul>
<li><b>Axis Capital Holdings Ltd</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/axs">AXS</a>) </li>
<li><b>Caterpillar Inc</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cat">CAT</a>) </li>
<li><b>CBL &#38; Associates Properties Inc</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/cbl">CBL</a>) </li>
<li><b>Enterprise GP Holdings LP</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/epe">EPE</a>) </li>
<li><b>Equinix Inc</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/eqix">EQIX</a>) </li>
<li><b>Exterran Holdings Inc</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/exh">EXH</a>) </li>
<li><b>Fortune Brands Inc</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fo">FO</a>) </li>
<li><b>GATX Corp</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/gmt">GMT</a>) </li>
<li><b>Genuine Parts Co</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/gpc">GPC</a>) </li>
<li><b>Ingram Micro Inc</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/im">IM</a>) </li>
<li><b>Interline Brands Inc</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/ibi">IBI</a>) </li>
<li><b>KB Financial Group Inc</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/kb">KB</a>) </li>
<li><b>Kyocera Corp</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/kyo">KYO</a>) </li>
<li><b>Lincoln National Corp</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/lnc">LNC</a>) </li>
<li><b>Porter Bancorp Inc</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/pbib">PBIB</a>) </li>
<li><b>Sunstone Hotel Investors Inc</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/sho">SHO</a>) </li>
<li><b>Textainer Group Holdings Ltd</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/tgh">TGH</a>) </li>
<li><b>Time Warner Inc</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/twx">TWX</a>) </li>
<li><b>Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/tkc">TKC</a>) </li></ul><br />View the entire <a href="http://www.zacks.com/portfolios/rank/5rank.php">Zacks #5 Rank List</a>. 
<p align="left"></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/zacks-5-rank-additions-for-thursday-zacks-tale-of-the-tape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Will It All End?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/how-will-it-all-end/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/how-will-it-all-end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allegheny Energy Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cfa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colgate Palmolive Company;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.R. Horton Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirk van Dijk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e.g. software;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford Motor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lennar Corporation;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long neglected infrastructure;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masco Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rank Strong;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sempra Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Jude Medical Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Premium;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/18416/How+Will+It+All+End%3F</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left">The economy is in awful shape right now, but it is not in a terminal decline from which it will never recover. We have faced hard times before and always managed to come out stronger on the other side. While I do believe in happy endings, I do not look for one right around the corner. </p>
<p align="left">Waiting for the recovery does not mean sitting on your hands and doing nothing. There are things that you can be doing today to help yourself prosper for the long run. Indeed, now may be the best time in your life to make moves that will help you have greater wealth later in life. </p>
<p align="left">The stock market almost always turns up before the economy does. Trying to pick the absolute bottom is a fool's game. We are far enough along in the process that it is time to start tiptoeing back into the market. </p>
<p align="left">Remember that a bear market is a long term investor's best friend. Only in bear markets do serious values appear. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Why the Recovery Will be Slow</b> </p>
<p align="left">The timing and shape of the eventual recovery will play a very important role in the success of your portfolio. In trying to figure out how and when the recession will end, it is useful to look at how other recessions have come to an end. </p>
<p align="left">In every recession, the part of the economy that gets moving first is residential investment, which is mostly the construction of new houses. Existing home sales, which make up about 7 of every 8 home transactions, also tend to start rising at the same time. (Existing home sales, however, are pretty much irrelevant to GDP growth since no construction is taking place.) </p>
<p align="left">The graph below shows that both new and existing home sales tend to bottom in recessions and then rise sharply, helping to drive the economy out of the recession. The dramatic decline in both was the biggest clue that a recession was coming. </p>
<p align="left"></p>
<p align="center"><img alt="" src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1237487209.jpg" /> </p>
<p align="left"></p>
<p align="left">The next thing to get going is consumer spending, particularly on big ticket stuff that people do not buy every day. The classic example of this is auto sales. </p>
<p align="left">Business investment tends to lag behind and, at best, moves with the overall economy (e.g. software and equipment investment) or after the rebound has firmly started (e.g. investment in new office buildings and stores). </p>
<p align="left">The unemployment rate lags economic cycles and tends to rise even after a recovery gets underway. Still, employment will normally start to improve faster than investment in non-residential structures. Non-residential construction has just started to turn down, and has much further to fall. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Home Prices, Not Starts, Are Key</b> </p>
<p align="left">So, with February's shocking news that new home starts jumped by 22.2% over January; does it mean that happy times are here again? Sadly no, and I actually consider this to be extremely bad news. </p>
<p align="left">At the January sales pace (the February data will be released on Wednesday), it would take 13.3 months to clear the existing inventory of new houses. Never before in history has the months of supply of new houses even exceeded a year. </p>
<p align="left">So while in the short term, the rise in starts is good news for the homebuilders like <b>D.R. Horton, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/DHI">DHI</a>) and <b>Lennar Corporation</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/len">LEN</a>), over the longer term it is bad news. Do not pay attention to the recent speculation into these companies, or in the major suppliers to them, like <b>Masco Corporation</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/MAS">MAS</a>) or <b>Fortune Brands, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/FO">FO</a>). </p>
<p align="left">Put another way, we have to remember the first law of holes. If you find yourself in one, stop digging. In this case literally, we need to stop digging new foundations. </p>
<p align="left">Now perhaps it is not quite as bad as the numbers look at first blush. Housing starts are a notoriously inexact statistic. However, in the absence of better information we have to assume the up 22.2% number is correct. Also, most of the new construction being started is for apartments and condos. Single family starts were only up 1.1%, while starts in structures with 5 or more units were up 79.7%. </p>
<p align="left">These new apartments and condos will be competing with the existing stock of new houses for sale, and with existing homes, and increasing number of which are distressed sales, in or near foreclosure. Housing prices fell by 18.5% in 2008, as measured by the 20-metro area Case-Schiller Index. This plunge was a major factor in the $11 trillion loss of wealth in the country in just the fourth quarter. </p>
<p align="left">On the other hand, is it a good time to be buying a house? Not really, based on long standing relationships between the price of a median house and median incomes. Furthermore, based on the historical relationship between what it would cost to rent or buy a comparable house, nationwide housing prices still probably have another 15% or so downside to them. A flood of new apartments coming on line will only further depress the natural equilibrium price for housing. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Consumers Not Eying Big Purchases</b> </p>
<p align="left">That loss of wealth is going to make people try to save more out of their current paychecks. Saving more can be tough when one or both spouses have lost their job, but many consumers don't have a choice. The retirement plans of all but the wealthiest baby boomers have just been severely disrupted. The 401K has become a 201K, and the equity they once had in their houses is gone. While the assets might be gone, the debt lingers on. </p>
<p align="left">The last thing a worried consumer is going do is go out and take on $25,000 of more debt to buy a new car. Rather he will keep the old one running for a few more years. </p>
<p align="left">Keep in mind that the quality of new cars, both U.S. brands like <b>General Motors</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/GM">GM</a>) and <b>Ford Motor</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/F">F</a>) and foreign nameplates like <b>Toyota</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/TM">TM</a>) and <b>Honda</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/HMC">HMC</a>) has improved dramatically since the last recession we had of this magnitude, back in the early 1980s. </p>
<p align="left">Yes, the current sales rate of under 10 million light vehicles is probably unsustainable over the long term, but that does not mean that we will have a strong rebound in sales soon. </p>
<p align="left"></p>
<p align="center"><img alt="" src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1237487511.jpg" /> </p>
<p align="left"></p>
<p align="left">The only thing that the economy really has going for it right now is the economic stimulus package. This will keep the incomes of those hardest hit by this downturn somewhat intact so they can continue to spend on necessities. Most people will get a small tax cut, and they might even spend some of that. </p>
<p align="left">The package should help to prevent state and local governments from dramatically cutting back services or raising taxes to balance their budgets. It will spur the overhaul of our long neglected infrastructure. We will start to improve our energy efficiency and produce renewable power sources. This will keep the economy alive, but on life support. </p>
<p align="left">From a low base, it is likely that the GDP will start to grow again towards the end of this year and into 2010, but the pace of that growth will be extremely anemic. Unemployment will continue to rise even as the economy starts to grow. </p>
<p align="left">The low interest rates and loose monetary policy being pursued by the Federal Reserve will last help in this life support mission. </p>
<p align="left">Eventually people will feel they have saved up enough, and their old goods are in such dire states of disrepair, that they start to spend again. But we still have a ways to go before enough demand gets pent up that we can get the economy going full bore. Time heals all wounds, even deep economic ones. </p>
<p align="left"><b>What to Do Now</b> </p>
<p align="left">I would suggest dollar cost averaging in over a period of about 6 months. So if you have $30,000 you want to invest, put $5,000 of it to work each month. This is far more advantageous than trying to pick an exact bottom, which is impossible. </p>
<p align="left">Stick with only those firms with strong balance sheets and which make products for which there is a steady demand. As a shareholder, you are part owner of all the assets of the firm. A firm with lots of cash will be able to take advantage of the bad economy. Its weaker competitors will be forced out of business or greatly weakened. The stronger companies will be able to scoop up the bargains that become available and gain market share. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Key Sectors</b> </p>
<p align="left">The first sector I would be looking at would be health care, closely followed by consumer staples. Think of companies like <b>Johnson &#38; Johnson</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/JNJ">JNJ</a>), <b>St. Jude Medical, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/STJ">STJ</a>) and <b>Colgate-Palmolive Company</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/CL">CL</a>). The economy would have to be in very desperate straits for people to stop buying band-aids, decide not to get a needed heart valve replacement or stop buying toothpaste. </p>
<p align="left">There are also some interesting investments available in the electric utilities. Zacks Equity Research currently has buy recommendations on <b>Allegheny Energy, Inc.</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/AYE">AYE</a>) and <b>Sempra Energy</b> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/SRE">SRE</a>). </p>
<p align="left">I would continue to avoid the financial and consumer discretionary sectors. I fear that there are many more write-offs to come in the financial sector, particularly as commercial real estate starts to decline. </p>
<p align="left">If you are determined to play the financials, I would advise buying the bonds of banks, not the common stock. The common stock is likely to get diluted, but it is clear that the government is not going to let major banks go bankrupt, which makes the bonds very safe investments. Plus the current worries have their bonds trading with high yields. </p>
<p align="left">The consumer discretionary sector is filled with companies where consumers can easily go on strike for a while. Given the need to rebuild savings, they could be staying away in droves for a long time. </p>
<p align="left">Understand that the longer your time horizon, the more likely it is that your investments will pay off. The time to buy stocks is when they are on sale, even if they get marked down further in the short-term. We may not be out the woods, but we will emerge out the current crisis in better shape. </p>
<p align="left">Best of Luck,<br />Dirk van Dijk, CFA<br />Director of Research,<br />Zacks Equity Research </p>
<p align="left"><i>Dirk heads a staff of analysts that provide continuous coverage for a universe of 1,150 companies. These analysts issue long-term recommendations and target prices. 
<p align="left">During the past 6 years, while S&#38;P 500 stocks went downward, Zacks Equity Research recommendations compounded a +234% gain. </p>
<p align="left">If you'd like to tap the full power of this research, there's now a way to do it for free. You are invited to access private Zacks Premium information from the Zacks.com web site. </p>
<p align="left">You'll be able to download professional-grade in-depth research reports for hundreds of stocks. You'll also find the best stocks to buy from its list of Zacks #1 Rank Strong Buys that has averaged a remarkable +27% yearly gain. In addition, you may consult the list of Zacks #5 Rank Strong Sells to get rid of your worst stocks. With Zacks Premium, you'll also be clued in on today's hottest industries and receive alerts to fast-breaking buy-and-sell opportunities. </p>
<p align="left">To try Zacks Premium for 30 days free, click here: <a href="http://at.zacks.com/?id=5395">http://at.zacks.com/?id=5395</a> </p></i></p>
<p align="left"></p><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/how-will-it-all-end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Housing Numbers at Record Low &#8211; Analyst Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/housing-numbers-at-record-low-analyst-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/housing-numbers-at-record-low-analyst-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Van Dijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank-owned homes;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.R. Horton Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masco Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Pacific Corp.;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weyerhaeuser Company;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zacks Market Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/17757/Housing+Numbers+at+Record+Low+-+Analyst+Blog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Highlights include D.R. Horton, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/dhi">DHI</a>), Standard Pacific Corp. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/spf">SPF</a>), Weyerhaeuser Company (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wy">WY</a>), Masco Corporation (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mas">MAS</a>) and Fortune Brands, Inc. (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fo">FO</a>).</span><br /><br />Let's just keep this simple mantra in mind right now when it comes to new housing data. More new housing starts and permits: Bad; more new housing sales: Good. That is not because I want to see more construction workers out of work -- I don't -- but because each new home built adds to the towering inventory of homes waiting to be sold, and continues to push housing prices lower.<br /><br />Housing prices will continue to fall in any case, until they reach their historical relationships with incomes and rents, but adding to excess supply sure does not help matters. With that in mind, the new home sales data from January was an unmitigated disaster.<br /><br />Nationwide, new home sales fell to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of just 309,000, a 10.2% drop from the 344,000 pace in December and a 48.2% decline from a year ago. It's not like a year ago was boom times for the homebuilders, either. New home sales peaked all the way back in July of 2005 at a 1.389 million annual rate, so we are now 77.8% below the peak (see first chart below, larger version available at <a target="_self" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/">http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/</a>).<br /><br />The declines this month were not even across the regions, however, and to be fair, one must point out that this data series is subject to big errors and revisions, particularly at the regional level. The worst decline by far came in the West, where new home sales plunged 28.0% for the month and are down 59.9% from a year ago.<br /><br />Incidentally, the West was the standout in the other direction when it came to the existing home sales data that was released yesterday, with existing home sales jumping 29.0% on much lower median prices. Coincidence?  I think not. It means that the huge number of bank-owned homes, and people who are desperate to swim away from their underwater mortgages, are proving to be insurmountable competition for the home builders.<br /><br />At the other end of the spectrum was the Northeast, where new home sales were actually up 12.5% on the month, although down 50.9% on a year-over-year basis. However, even with the amazing relative performance for the month, the region is pretty insignificant when it comes to the overall new home picture -- it represented just 8.7% of overall sales. The West, even with its plunge, represented 19.1% of overall sales.<br /><br />The big kahuna of the new home sales market is the South region, where new home sales were down 6.5% on the month, and 45.9% year over year. It represents 55.7% of all new home sales. The Midwest saw a 5.6% monthly decline and is off 33.8% year over year. <br /><br />With the decline in new housing starts, the absolute inventory levels are coming down. The number of new houses for sale dropped by 3.1% on the month, and are down 29.3% from a year ago. However, the decline in inventories is nowhere close to being as big as the decline in sales.<br /><br />As a result, the months of inventory continue to climb, setting new records each month. At the January sales pace, it would take 13.3 months to clear out the existing inventory, up from 12.2 months in December and 9.8 months a year ago. To put this in perspective -- during the housing boom, the months supply number hovered around 4 months, and over the long sweep of history, a level of about 6 months is normal (see second chart, also from <a target="_self" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/">http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/</a>).<br /><br />The overall rate of new home sales are the lowest on record, and the records go back to 1963. For perspective, the civilian non-institutional population was 121.5 million in 1963, and it is 234.7 million now. At the previous record low, in April of 1982, the population was 171.8 million, and a 30-year mortgage was at 16.9%.<br /><br />Stay away, stay far away from the homebuilders like <span style="font-weight: bold;">D.R. Horton</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/dhi">DHI</a>) and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Standard Pacific</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/spf">SPF</a>), and the major suppliers to them such as lumber companies like <span style="font-weight: bold;">Weyerhaeuser </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/wy">WY</a>) and hardware firms like <span style="font-weight: bold;">Masco</span> (<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/mas">MAS</a>) and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Fortune Brands </span>(<a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/fo">FO</a>).<br /><br /><img src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1235671234bmp" alt="" /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.zacks.com/images/upload_dir/1235671207bmp" alt="" /><br /><br />
<br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=DHI">Read the full analyst report on "DHI"</a><br /><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=YAHOO_ZR&#38;d_alert=rd_final_rank&#38;ADID=GENSYND_ZER&#38;t=MAS">Read the full analyst report on "MAS"</a><br /><a href="http://www.zacks.com">Zacks Investment Research</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/housing-numbers-at-record-low-analyst-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stocks Going Ex Dividend Early November</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/stocks-going-ex-dividend-early-november/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/stocks-going-ex-dividend-early-november/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 06:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Fuld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Market News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stocks to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoa Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autoliv Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enbridge Energy Partners L.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FirstEnergy Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune Brands Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inergy L.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magellan Midstream Holdings LP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magellan Midstream Partners L.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nustar GP Holdings LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn Virginia GP Holdings L.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Edward Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipholding Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunoco Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia GP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23020893.post-2603163804182880694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In bull markets, investors sometimes use a stock trading technique called 'Buying Dividends,' which is the technique of buying stocks before the ex dividend date and selling the stock shortly after the ex date at approximately the same price, yet still being entitled to the dividend. This technique usually only works in bull markets.<br /><br />If you are interested in <a href="http://stockerblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/buying-dividends-top-7-stocks-going-ex.html">buying dividends</a>, there are several stocks in several different sectors and industries to choose from. In order to be entitled to the dividend, you have to buy the stock before the ex-dividend date, and you can't sell the stock until after the ex date. The actual dividend may not be paid for another month.<br /><br />All of the following stocks have market caps over $500 million, and yields over 3%. <br /><br />NuStar GP Holdings, LLC (NSH) is going ex-dividend on 11/3/2008. The stock has a PE of 17 , a PEG of 1.51 and a yield of 8.40% .<br /><br />Autoliv Inc. (ALV) is going ex-dividend on 11/4/2008. The stock has a PE of 5 , a PEG of 0.54 and a yield of 6.88% .<br /><br />Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (EEP) is going ex-dividend on 11/4/2008. The stock has a PE of 13 , a PEG of 3.29 and a yield of 12.16% .<br /><br />Penn Virginia Resources (PVR) is going ex-dividend on 11/4/2008 The stock has a PE of 14 , a PEG of 1.61 and a yield of 12.61% .<br /><br />Penn Virginia GP Holdings, L.P. (PVG) is going ex-dividend on 11/4/2008. The stock has a PE of 18 , a PEG of 0.99 and a yield of 8.78% .<br /><br />Alcoa Inc. (AA) is going ex-dividend on 11/5/2008. The stock has a PE of 6 , a PEG of 0.73 and a yield of 5.57% .<br /><br />FirstEnergy Corp. (FE) is going ex-dividend on 11/5/2008. The stock has a PE of 12 , a PEG of 1.69 and a yield of 4.47% .<br /><br />Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. (MMP) is going ex-dividend on 11/5/2008. The stock has a PE of 10 , a PEG of 1.45 and a yield of 9.23% .<br /><br />Inergy, L.P. (NRGY) is going ex-dividend on 11/5/2008. The stock has a PE of 28 , a PEG of 4.00 and a yield of 12.65% .<br /><br />Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. (OSG) is going ex-dividend on 11/5/2008. The stock has a PE of 5 , a PEG of 0.28 and a yield of 4.09% .<br /><br />Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P. (MGG) is going ex-dividend on 11/5/2008. The stock has a PE of 13 , a PEG of 0.77 and a yield of 8.05% .<br /><br />Sunoco, Inc. (SUN) is going ex-dividend on 11/6/2008. The stock has a PE of 13 , a PEG of 1.75 and a yield of 4.74% .<br /><br />Fortune Brands, Inc. (FO) is going ex-dividend on 11/7/2008. The stock has a PE of 12 , a PEG of 1.25 and a yield of 4.43% .<br /><br />For more details on dividend definitions, check out <a href="http://stockerblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/dividend-basics-and-whos-going-ex-in.html">definitions of dividend dates</a>. If you like dividend stocks, you should check out the the High Yield Utility stocks and the Monthly Dividend Stocks at <a href="http://WallStreetNewsNetwork.com">WallStreetNewsNetwork.com</a>.<br /><br /><em>Author does not own any of the above. </em><br /><br />By <a href="http://Stockerblog.com">Stockerblog.com</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><div class='adsense' style='0px 3px 0.5em 3px;'>



</div></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/current-market-news/stocks-going-ex-dividend-early-november/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
