$9 trillion– what, me worry?
James Hamilton (August 28th, 2009) Writes:
Paul Krugman may not be that concerned by the Obama administration's new projection that the unified federal budget deficits will sum to $9 trillion dollars over the next 10 years. But I am.
Here's the argument Paul Krugman gave for why $9 trillion maybe isn't as huge a sum as it sounds:
even if we do run these deficits, federal debt as a share of GDP will be substantially less than it was at the end of World War II. It will also be substantially less than, say, debt in several European countries in the mid to late 1990s.
Political Math (hat tip: Russ Roberts) takes a closer look at Paul's first comparison:
implicit in his observation is the concept that since we did fine after WWII, we'll do fine now. But the years after WWII saw drastic reductions in the inflation-adjusted debt driven by drastic reductions
...Concord Coalition;, Diane Lim Rogers, Economics, Fannie, Fdic, Federal Government, Federal Reserve System, Freddie, Market Commentary, Obama administration, Paul Krugman, Russ Roberts;, USD


![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/silver/t24_ag_en_usoz_2.gif)

