a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZckZ-8naz0/SeoR7M1ERHI/AAAAAAAACiE/K8qb29LcEho/s1600-h/Cusick.jpg"img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 266px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZckZ-8naz0/SeoR7M1ERHI/AAAAAAAACiE/K8qb29LcEho/s400/Cusick.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5326089218072790130" border="0" //aThe second portion of the a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB124000828983730469.html"Barron's editorial commentary/a contained this little nugget;br /br /span style="color: rgb(0, 153, 0);"The Congressional Budget Office reported that payroll-tax receipts will barely cover Social Security benefits next fiscal year./spanbr /br /To repeat a href="http://twitter.com/randomroger"my tweet/a from yesterday about this; uh-oh.br /br /Entitlements loom as a $50 trillion problem. The estimates about when it starts to run into trouble starts, I believe, in 2018 with some estimates call for it going under in 2042, if memory serves. Of course there are other folks who come up with much rosier scenarios. I don't know what is right all I can tell you is that I am not planning on having it--if I am wrong then all the better.br /br /I write about this ...