What is Wrong With Matt Hougan?
Jim Wiandt (June 16th, 2009) Writes:
For all of his knowledge of exchange-traded products, Hougan still can’t get it right.
It is almost farcical to me, Matt, that, for all of your knowledge of the ETP industry, you still can’t get your terminology right. And the net result is that, while you portray yourself as being part of the solution for the problems in the industry, you are actually part of the problem.
Nothing you talked about in your blog is an “ETF”. Nothing. Leveraged products, futures-based products, USL, USO, all the Direxion and ProShares and some of the Rydex products, and even the iPath products…none of them are really “funds” and certainly not one of them would I classify as an ETF. These are all, to me, as I’ve repeatedly said in public and in my blog, exchange-traded products or notes or perhaps even structured products. And it’s high time we stopped calling them ETFs.
Because, as I
...

![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/silver/t24_ag_en_usoz_2.gif)

