<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stock Market News &#38; Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks &#187; bank rescue package</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.straightstocks.com/tag/bank-rescue-package/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.straightstocks.com</link>
	<description>Leading Stock Market News, Opinions and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Finally, the plan … sort of</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/finally-the-plan-%e2%80%a6-sort-of/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/finally-the-plan-%e2%80%a6-sort-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prieur du Plessis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow 30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dublin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerald Isle;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard russell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy  Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/02/11/finally-the-plan-sort-of/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner yesterday disappointed the markets with the lack of detail on the Financial Stability Plan. This post considers the reaction of stock markets and asks the question: "where to now?".

Please visit my website (by cl...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/finally-the-plan-%e2%80%a6-sort-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dollar Falls vs. Euro</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/dollar-falls-vs-euro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/dollar-falls-vs-euro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Casey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Ruskin;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathy Lien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBS Greenwich Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=13224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pIn the currency market, the dollar sank against the euro. Late Friday, the euro was trading at $1.2932 vs. $1.2861 on Thursday. /p
pYesterday came the grim jobs figures everyone was expecting. The Labor Department reported that non-farm payrolls fell by a seasonally adjusted 598,000 in January after a revised loss of 577,000 in December. That marked the largest payroll loss since December 1974./p
pAt the same time, the unemployment rate soared to 7.6%, compared with 7.2% in December. That was even worse than already-pessimistic economists’ expectations for a rise to 7.5%, and is the highest unemployment rate since September 1992./p
p“These numbers are dreadful but does it matter?” asked Alan Ruskin of RBS Greenwich Capital. “No,” he wrote. “All the prior labor#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/dollar-falls-vs-euro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gold Falls 2 % as Investors Cash in on Gains</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/gold-falls-2-as-investors-cash-in-on-gains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/gold-falls-2-as-investors-cash-in-on-gains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglo Platinum;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue plans;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerzbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Falls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignored rising oil prices;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson Matthey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[main  external drivers   oil;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Kempinski;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palladium;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platinum miner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precious metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senior  trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPDR Gold Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TheBullionDesk.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white metal;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yellow metal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=13188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p style="text-align: left;"The Markets await the Obama economic stimulus and bank rescue plans#8230;  AngloPlat reports higher earnings but flags up cost fears#8230; Johnson Matthey (a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=LON:JMAT"JMAT/a) sees 2009 platinum demand declining 5 pct#8230;/p
pThis from Reuters, London:/p
blockquotepGold fell nearly 2 percent in Europe on Monday as investors took profits after recent gains, amid disappointment the metal had failed to beat resistance near $930 an ounce last week. /p
p Spot gold  slipped to $895.65/897.65 an ounce at 1446 GMT, down from $911.70 in New York late on Friday. Earlier it touched a low of $893.15. /p
p U.S. gold futures for April  delivery on the COMEX  division of the New York Mercantile Exchange fell $16.30 to  $897.60 an ounce. /p
p #8220;There has been some profit taking and disappointment we#8230;/p/blockquote]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/gold-falls-2-as-investors-cash-in-on-gains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dollar Little Changed Against Euro</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/dollar-little-changed-against-euro-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/dollar-little-changed-against-euro-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Casey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contrarian profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal reserve board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mervyn King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Volcker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Presses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy  Geithner;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=12121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p class="maintextDRP"In the currency market, the dollar was off slightly against the euro. Late Wednesday, the euro was trading at $1.2872 vs. $1.2856 on Tuesday. /p
pSterling continued to take a pounding, so to speak, falling nearly to $1.36 before edging back over $1.37./p
pWith the UK’s financial system in shambles, Bank of England Gov. Mervyn King said that the central bank is considering buying up a range of assets in the coming weeks, in an attempt to re-start stalled lending to businesses and households./p
pKing also promised #8220;quantitative easing#8221; measures that could be used to boost the money supply (i.e., roll the printing presses), considering the economic contraction that threatens to push inflation below the central bank#8217;s 2% target./p
pBack home, Timothy Geithner, Barack#8230;/p]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/market-commentary/dollar-little-changed-against-euro-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is The Level Of Deflation Risk In Germany?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/what-is-the-level-of-deflation-risk-in-germany-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/what-is-the-level-of-deflation-risk-in-germany-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAA government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander Kockerbeck;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angel Merkel;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel's administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue costs;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billion-euro bank rescue fund;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car purchases;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Heinz Daube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy Ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy price shock;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Finance Agency;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Labor Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Statistical Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Statistics Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frankfurter Allgemeine;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germann Economy Ministry;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germans;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GfK AG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative energy;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norbert Walter;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public finance;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sudden negative energy shock;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-2380847575101513569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: Barlecona br /br /br /Only one thing is really clear about the Germany economy at the present time, and that is that it is shrinking rapidly. In fact it contracted far more than most analysts and observers expected in the third quarter (although I, for one, a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/euro-monitor/252923/what_is_the_recession_risk_for_the_german_economy"was not especially surprised/a), entering what now appears to be its worst recession in at least 12 years as both exports and domestic spending continue to fall. German gross domestic product in Q3 dropped by a seasonally adjusted 0.5 percent from the second quarter, when it fell by a quarterly 0.4 percent, according to revised data from the Federal Statistics Office. The Germany economy last had a two quarter contraction of this magnitude back in 1996.br /br /br /pa href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SRwqCqomolI/AAAAAAAALd8/hUkBJVBg6wg/s1600-h/GDP+y-o-y.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5268131889409335890" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 198px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SRwqCqomolI/AAAAAAAALd8/hUkBJVBg6wg/s320/GDP+y-o-y.png" border="0" //abr /br /And all the signs are that the fourth quarter will be worse than the third one, so the situation may even surpass the 1996 recession.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SRwp90SJJdI/AAAAAAAALd0/o53dnYx-6I4/s1600-h/german+gdp+qoq.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5268131806100137426" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 197px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SRwp90SJJdI/AAAAAAAALd0/o53dnYx-6I4/s320/german+gdp+qoq.png" border="0" //abr /What's more the 2009 outlook promises to be even worse. The International Monetary Fund are now forecasting outright GDP contractions for the U.S., Japan and the eurozone next year, with Germany's economy expected to shrink by at least 0.8 percent (this as we will see is one of the most optimistic forecasts currently on the table for German GDP next year). The European Commission declared the 15-nation eurozone to be in recession in November, and just over 40 percent of the exports from this highly export dependent economy go to other eurozone nations.br /br /The only positive elements in the Q3 GDP data are to be found in the slight increases in both final household consumption and government expenditure. On a seasonal and calendar-adjusted basis, household consumption expenditure rose by a quarterly 0.3%, while government final consumption expenditure rose 0.8%. Gross fixed capital formation rose slightly (0.1%) due laregly to a sharp uptick in construction over the second quarter (+0.3%, following –3.4% in the second quarter and +5.5% in the first). /ppIn addition there was a large increase in inventories, and inventories contributed a whopping 0.9 percentage points to Q3 growth (see chart below), and without this build-up the contraction would have been much sharper - so watch out since this inventory increase which will more than likely be unwound in the fourth quarter, with considerable downside impact. Imports were up significantly (largely due to the rise in oil prices - oil peaked around $147 a barrel in July), while exports dropped, as a consquence movements in the net trade balance had a negative impact on final GDP.br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SSwl5MJvlMI/AAAAAAAALjU/We-sn8NG70c/s1600-h/Germany+gdp+components.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5272630928188871874" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 197px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SSwl5MJvlMI/AAAAAAAALjU/We-sn8NG70c/s320/Germany+gdp+components.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /Capital formation in machinery and equipment (ie investment) was down sharply (–0.5%), after increasing for seven quarters in a row. Thus the entire positive impact of domestic consumption and increased inventories was more than offset by a very rapid and sharp deterioration in the net export position. Between July and September exports were down by 0.4% over the previous quarter, whereas imports were up 3.8%. This meant that net exports contributed a whopping minus 1.7 percentage points to q-o-q GDP, and headline German GDP is extraordinarily sensitive to changes in the net trade position (see chart below).br //ppa href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SSwl-sm0VbI/AAAAAAAALjc/gnAKFDO-2g0/s1600-h/german+exports+and+GDP.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5272631022800098738" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 198px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SSwl-sm0VbI/AAAAAAAALjc/gnAKFDO-2g0/s320/german+exports+and+GDP.png" border="0" //a /ppstrongDeteriorating Short Term Outlookbr //strongbr /Looking forward into Q4, the signs, as I said, are for deterioration, as can be seen from the fact that (according to the latest flash PMI) German services contracted for the third consecutive month in December, even if the rate of contraction was slightly less than that in November.br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU_OaHMLKpI/AAAAAAAAL3E/tGssBSxnT-c/s1600-h/germany+services+PMI.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282667835930913426" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 175px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU_OaHMLKpI/AAAAAAAAL3E/tGssBSxnT-c/s320/germany+services+PMI.png" border="0" //abr /br /Worse still, the contraction in manufacturing accelerated, and sharply so, clocking up its fifth consecutive month of contraction according to the flash estimate. The data released by Markit Economics showed German manufacturing registering its lowest reading for manufacturing since the survey was started in April 1996, with the indicator falling to 33.5, down 2.2 points from the November result and significantly exceeding the 1.3 point decline expected by the analysts. If we break the figures down we find that output tumbled all the way to 29.9 (from 32.3 in November), while new orders slipped 3.3 points to a record low of 25.8. Meanwhile, the employment component reached its worse level in the history of the index, coming in at 40.9 for the month from November's 43.6.br /br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU_PRlmTdYI/AAAAAAAAL3M/ZVWhvpNu8nU/s1600-h/germany+manufacturing+PMI.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282668788986377602" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 174px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU_PRlmTdYI/AAAAAAAAL3M/ZVWhvpNu8nU/s320/germany+manufacturing+PMI.png" border="0" //abr /br /strongOctober Industrial Output Down/strongbr /br /br /The PMI data are obviously only survey-based forward-looking estimates, but when we come to the actual data we find they are normally pretty near to the mark, since German industrial output fell strongly in October - dropping a seasonally adjusted 2.1 percent from September - according to the latest data from the Economy Ministry. Year on year working day adjusted output fell 3.8 percent. And November’s drop was led by a 3.1 percent month-on-month slump in the demand for investment goods, which means that companies are anticipating a serious slowdown in final manufactured goods further on down the line.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ST_Yb_1D0oI/AAAAAAAALtk/6zy7FbcMUsY/s1600-h/german+industry.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5278175263803560578" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 177px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ST_Yb_1D0oI/AAAAAAAALtk/6zy7FbcMUsY/s320/german+industry.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /br /strongAnd the PMI is Confirmed By New Orders Data/strongbr /br /I think nothing gives us a clearer illustration the dramatic nature of the industrial slowdown the Germans are now experiencing than the chart reproduced below which shows changes in monthly orders (both domestic and for exports) for German manufacturing industry over the last decade. As you will see (to use one of my choice phrases of late) we just went careering off a cliff.br /br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ST_eF_9YMLI/AAAAAAAALts/FYOCAPv4Vkk/s1600-h/german+manufacturing+orders.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5278181482951094450" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 171px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ST_eF_9YMLI/AAAAAAAALts/FYOCAPv4Vkk/s320/german+manufacturing+orders.png" border="0" //abr /New manufacturing orders dropped 6.1% in October from September, and in September they fell 8.3% from August. The quarter on quarter drop is huge - in the order of 40%.br /br /Export orders are falling faster than domestic ones in the longer term during Sepetmber even domestic orders started to contract sharply as well - a 6.1% drop as compared to 6.2% for exports. What this suggests that the "second round effects" on domestic consumption from the drop in export sales are now hitting domestic manufacturing order books.br /br /strongExports Up Only 1.4% In October/strongbr /br /br /Now it is, I think, generally accepted that German domestic demand is lacklustre, and has been for some years, and the German economy lives (or dies) from exports, so it is not without importance that according to the most recent provisional data from the Federal Statistical Office, October German exports were worth up only 1.4% (non price adjusted) and imports up 5.4% from their respective October 2007 levels. After calendar and seasonal adjustment, exports in fact decreased by 0.5% (and imports by 3.5%) month on month when compared with September.br /br /The foreign trade surplus was 16.4 billion euros in October 2008, down from the October 2007 surplus of 18.9 billion euros.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ST_4nHtN2XI/AAAAAAAALt8/X51X4TAMTWs/s1600-h/german+exports.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5278210639268796786" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 170px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/ST_4nHtN2XI/AAAAAAAALt8/X51X4TAMTWs/s320/german+exports.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /strongGrowth Outlook/strongbr /br /It is very hard to put precise numbers on where the German economy is likely to go from here. Certainly GDP growth next year is going to be a shocker on the downside - with or without those notorious calendar adjustments. The Essen-based RWI economic institute are forecasting what now seems to be a "low end" prediction of a 2 percent contraction for next year, but even this would already be the biggest annual contraction since World War II. The have been joined by the IFO institute, who foresee a contraction of 2.2%. At the present time everyone is moving on the downside and accepting the reality of what is happening, with the Berlin-based DIW economic institute also cutting its forecast for the final quarter of 2008 to a contraction of 0.3 percent - down from previously anticipated growth of 0.2 percent (citing in justification the declines in industrial output and construction). The Kiel-based IfW suggested this week that the German economy will shrink 2.7 percent next year - the most pessimistic assessment by any leading research institute. Worse they are suggesting that equipment investment will drop 7.4 percent in 2009 (following a 4.9 percent this year) and that exports will decline 9 percent, (compared with an estimated gain of 5.1 percent in 2008). If these last two guess-timates are anywhere near right, then the German 2009 contraction will be very significant indeed, since exports are the key to the functioning of the German economy.br //ppAccording to a report in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung earlier this month the Germann Economy Ministry currently estimate that the economy may shrink by as much as 3 percent next year.br /br /Even further along the scale there is Deutsche Bank, who are forecasting a contraction of as much as 4 percent next year. Deutsche Bank chief economist Norbert Walter makes his forecast based on the deteriorating economic situation in Russia and in the Middle East, countries which have been vital in sustaining demand for German exports in recent months. As a fair weather pessimist on the German front, I feel that Walter may be near the mark than most, and my reasoning would be based on the severity of the downturn both in Russian and Eastern Europe, as well as the slump in Southern Europe, lead by Spain's sharp and resonant housing crash. Since these regions collectively are customers for a very sizeable part of German exports, I expect a pretty horrendous H1 for German GDP in 2009 - and the bad news could go on a good deal longer, since I am sure the East and Southern European agonies are going to drag on at least int0 2010. /ppstrongBusiness Confidence Plummets/strongbr /br /br /Certainly the omens for Q4 2008 are now clear enough. German business confidence has been falling sharply since the summer, and dropped to its lowest level in more than of a quarter century in December. The Ifo institute business climate index, which is based on a survey of 7,000 executives, fell to 82.6 from 85.8 in November, giving the main index lowest reading since November 1982. The drop was largely a product of a significant fall in the current economic situation component - which fell to 88.8 from 94.9 in December. Expectations remained largely unchanged at a very low level. /ppa href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SUospDdXGHI/AAAAAAAALzE/jDbO4EE2D6A/s1600-h/german+ifo.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5281082596860041330" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 196px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SUospDdXGHI/AAAAAAAALzE/jDbO4EE2D6A/s320/german+ifo.png" border="0" //abr /The main sub components all remained very low in December,but what is most striking is the rapidity of the deterioration we have been seeing in the manufacturing sector.br /br /br /a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SUotgbMIkAI/AAAAAAAALzM/jWWIOP5yhgs/s1600-h/german+IFO+2.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5281083548123041794" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 190px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SUotgbMIkAI/AAAAAAAALzM/jWWIOP5yhgs/s320/german+IFO+2.png" border="0" //abr /br /German consumer confidence has held up rather better (possibly a function of the resilience of the labour market, and the drop in inflation) and has remained largely unchanged following a fairly sharp deterioration in August. In December growing pessimism about the short term economic outlook was offset by a stronger willingness to buy, and GfK AG’s forward looking index for January, based on a survey of about 2,000 people, held steady at 2.1.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU-PVZDV3uI/AAAAAAAAL2M/Cz8rcrQdt4k/s1600-h/gfk2.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282598485593808610" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 158px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU-PVZDV3uI/AAAAAAAAL2M/Cz8rcrQdt4k/s320/gfk2.png" border="0" //abr /strongEmployment Resists The Downturn/strongbr /pGerman unemployment continued to drop in November, despite the scale of the recession that just hit the country, and employers continue to retain and even recruit staff while orders slump. The number of people out of work, adjusted for seasonal variations, dropped a further 10,000 in November to reach 3.15 million, following a 26,000 fall in October, according to data from the Federal Labor Agency. The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate held steady at 7.5 percent, a 16- year low.br //pa href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SS6dZ5gWymI/AAAAAAAALlE/9UbfR71hm14/s1600-h/germany+unemployed.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5273325281956252258" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 198px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SS6dZ5gWymI/AAAAAAAALlE/9UbfR71hm14/s320/germany+unemployed.png" border="0" //abr /br /Meanwhile separate data from the Federal Statistical Office show that in October 2008 there were 40.84 million Germans in employment, an increase of 538,000 (or 1.3%) over October 2007 . In facr this was the highest number of Germans employed ever. Month on month the number of those employed was up by 219,000 on an uncorrected basis, which was equivalent to an increase of 39,000 ( or 0.1%) on a seasonally adjusted basis. So the great German jobs machine is still working.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SS6c6ZsSehI/AAAAAAAALk8/a0j8IiKY8IQ/s1600-h/germany+employed.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5273324740840421906" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 193px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SS6c6ZsSehI/AAAAAAAALk8/a0j8IiKY8IQ/s320/germany+employed.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /The big question which is puzzling many economists however is why this increase in employment does not feed though to private consumption. My own personal feeling is that you need to look at the age profile of the German workforce, and the low value added content of much of the new employment. Some reflection of this can be found in the fact that (on aggregate) labour productivity (price-adjusted gross domestic product per person in employment) in the third quarter of 2008 was down by 0.1% year-on-year in Q3 2008. When measured on a per hour worked basis labour productivity was down by 0.2%.br /br /br /So jobs are created, but household consumption expenditure hardly moves, and in fact it decreased by 0.3% year on year in Q3, despite the 0.3% increase quarter-on-quarter. So as unemployment has fallen German households have been spending less, especially on food, beverages and tobacco (–1.5%) and on transport and communications (–3.1%). The big factor in the latter decline was the marked decrease in private car purchases and the sharp drop in petrol consumption. As can be seen in the chart below, following the pre- VAT rise spike in Q4 2006, household consumption has remained decidedly lacklustre, despite the economy have had one of its most substantial expansions in over a decade.br /br /br /pa href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SSwqwHDtCvI/AAAAAAAALjk/zWKdyMcqey0/s1600-h/german+household+consumption.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5272636269760678642" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 194px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SSwqwHDtCvI/AAAAAAAALjk/zWKdyMcqey0/s320/german+household+consumption.png" border="0" //abr /If we look at the seasonally adjusted monthly retail sales chart (see below) we will see that these have been dropping steadily (stripping out the December 2006 spike) since mid 2006, and the decline continues.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SVAE72setcI/AAAAAAAAL3c/4Mkkz1pUojQ/s1600-h/german+retail+sales.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282727789246461378" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 198px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SVAE72setcI/AAAAAAAAL3c/4Mkkz1pUojQ/s320/german+retail+sales.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /strongPrice Inflation Falls Dramatically/strongbr /br /br /So to get back to the question I ask in the title to this post, we know that the German economy is going to contract sharply next year - by anything between 2 and 4 percentage points - so given the severity of this shock just what are the dangers that the sudden negative energy shock can push core inflation over into deflation mode?br /pWell, if we look at German producer prices - which can reasonably be considered a forward looking indicator for future prices, we find that they dropped sharply in November - in fact by the most since records began in 1949. This was of course a reflection pf the fact that the cost of oil declined drastically, but it is also an indicator of growing excess capacity as the global economic slowdown curbs demand. Producer prices fell 1.5 percent month on month, while the year on year rate fell back 5.3 percent. But if we look at the index itself (see chart) we will see that prices peaked in July (when oil prices were at a record), and have been falling steadily since.br //ppa href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU_EuTpq68I/AAAAAAAAL28/o1uhnr75vMw/s1600-h/germany+PPI.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282657187756960706" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 174px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU_EuTpq68I/AAAAAAAAL28/o1uhnr75vMw/s320/germany+PPI.png" border="0" //abr /And if we take a look at German consumer and producer price inflation together (see chart below), we will see that the energy price shock went in two waves. When the first wave petered out, consumer prices also fell, but they soon steadied, as the force of the expansionary momentum helped prices find a floor. But look what is happening after the second wave, producer prices are in virtual freefall, and these are dragging consumer prices along behind them, and when we think of the scale of contraction which we may well see in 2009, then it seems to me that the danger of opening up a deflationary dynamic behind the shock is a real and credible one.br /br /a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU_D8RJ99LI/AAAAAAAAL20/z1UhPzm8lQU/s1600-h/germany+PPI+CPI.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282656328093660338" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 197px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU_D8RJ99LI/AAAAAAAAL20/z1UhPzm8lQU/s320/germany+PPI+CPI.png" border="0" //abr /br /In fact German consumer price growth slowed to 1.4 percent in Novermber according to the EU harmonized measure, down from 2.5 percent in October, falling significantly below the ECB’s price stability threshold of around two percent, and the lowest level in two years. Again this was the biggest decline since the federal statistics office started calculating German inflation using the HICP methodology in 1996. From a month earlier, prices were down 0.6 percent. /ppAgain if we look at the index itself, we can see that prices have been falling since the summer, but if we dig a bit deeper, and take a look at the core index (that's the one to watch really, without energy, food, alchohol and tobacco, see chart below) then we will find that even on this measure prices have been stationary, and what we now need to watch out for is that the shock from the credit crunch driven GDP contraction addeded to the negative energy shock doesn't simply drive the core index into negative territory. It is impossible to say at the present time whether this will actually happen, but obviously the risk is real, and those over at the ECB would do well to remember this.br /br /br //pa href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU_Dtmbn1nI/AAAAAAAAL2s/LNOjBRVjdfk/s1600-h/germany+HICP.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5282656076106815090" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 166px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SU_Dtmbn1nI/AAAAAAAAL2s/LNOjBRVjdfk/s320/germany+HICP.png" border="0" //abr /br /br /br /strongFiscal Stimulus And Rising Deficit Pressure/strongbr /br /Reactions to a problem of this magnitute will need to be on two fronts. The ECB obviously need to bring interest rates down rapidly and dramatically, and probably need to be thinking about how they can operate Japan and US style a href="http://japanjapan.blogspot.com/2008/12/did-or-didnt-japan-just-re-introduce.html"quantitative easing/a within a Eurosystem framework. On the other hand a fiscal response is essential, and Angela Merkel is reputedly considering a new package of measures in the early new year in addition to the stimulus package (estimated to have a net worth of about 31 billion euros in 2009) already announced.br /br /The German Premier met the leaders of Germany's 16 states last Thursday to discuss additional measures, but no details of the package under discussionhave yet been announced. Angel Merkel did, however, suggest on Friday that the emphasis will be on infrastructure projects such as schools and roads - but since the areas of the Germany economy which are currently suffering most are the exports and capital goods sectors it isn't clear how much value this will really be.br /br /But all of this has a downside, since it is now estimated that Germany will need to sell more debt next year than at any time since the end of World War II to finance the vaious measures being taken. Gross federal bond sales are set to expand by nearly 50 percent - to 323 billion euros ($471 billion) from 220 billion euros this year - according to the emissions calendar of the Federal Finance Agency. The 2009 issuance will be made up of 149 billion euros in bonds with a maturity of one year or more and 174 billion euros in shorter-dated money market securities.br /br /The bond sales calendar is based on a budget that assumes economic growth of 0.2 percent next year, but as we have seen above this forecast is way out of line with what leading economic forecasters anticipate, thus the level of financing will likely be considerably greater at the end of the day, even without any additional stimulus packages.br /br /Thus, following a 2008 budget which was basically balanced following a longer term strategy, Angela Merkel will now need to cope with a federal deficit which is certainly going to expand significantly as tax growth dwindles and spending rises. And bank rescue costs will come on top of the above, pushing the credit requirement up even further. Germany created a 480 billion-euro bank rescue fund in October comprising 400 billion euros in guarantees and as much as 80 billion euros in recapitalization steps, both of which will need to be financed in some form or other through the bond market. It is thought that around 200 billion euros will be approved in guarantees by the end of January and about 20 billion euros in capital measures. It seems however that bonds sold to boost banks’ capital reserves will be reported off budget, and thus not figure in accounts reported to the European Union's Eurostat office. blockquoteGermany plans to finance part of its 500 billion euro ($636 billion) bank rescue package by issuing bonds to banks in exchange for new preferred stock, according to Finance Agency head Carl Heinz Daube. ``The banks will not be allowed to sell the injected government bonds,'' Daube said in an interview in Tokyo today. ``So far there's obviously not a huge demand for any rescue measures, but this might change in the coming weeks.'' Germany's rescue plan, approved by lawmakers on Oct. 17, amounts to about 20 percent of the gross domestic product of Europe's biggest economy. Chancellor Angela Merkel's administration pledged 80 billion euros to recapitalize distressed banks, with the rest allocated to cover loan guarantees and losses./blockquotepDespite the changed dynamic in public finance, however, the German government is unlikely to experience any real difficulties selling its debt, and the country continues to enjoy a "stable'' outlook from Moody's Investors Service on its Aaa government bond ratings according to a report published earlier this month. /pblockquote"Germany's public debt payment capacity is strong and Moody's anticipates no problems with regard to affordability or adverse debt dynamics, even with the impact of the economic slowdown likely to be felt on both sides of the government balance sheet,'' said Moody's analyst Alexander Kockerbeck./blockquotepIt is not clear, however that things are going to remain quite so cut and dry in the future, as the government continues to expand net borrowing on the one hand while slower economic growth even after the recession, on the other, will continue to restrain revenue growth. And as Germany's population ages, health and pension costs are set to mount, and to some extent all this fiscal strain is going to undo a lot of the impact of the "good housekeeping" measures taken in earlier years, making another set of painful reforms more or less inevitable as and when the recovery comes. Angela Merkel is undoubtedly well aware of this harsh reality, and this is surely part of the explanation for why she has tried to keep debt growth under control as possible - much to the chagrin of her EU counterparts in London and Paris, where the demographic dynamics are, of course, much more favourable - even as her budget expands to pay for the emergency fiscal programs. /pblockquote"A balanced budget remains our target because the demographic changes in Germany will increasingly have an effect from the middle of the coming decade. We must not overburden the younger ones," Merkel said.br /br /a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SS2KzAyXmsI/AAAAAAAALkE/zC8e6ERpJTo/s1600-h/germany+median+age.png"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5273023347709942466" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 184px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SS2KzAyXmsI/AAAAAAAALkE/zC8e6ERpJTo/s320/germany+median+age.png" border="0" //a/blockquote]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/what-is-the-level-of-deflation-risk-in-germany-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bank Bailouts Are Very Well Intended, But Where Is All The Money Going To Come From?</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/german-stocks/the-bank-bailouts-are-very-well-intended-but-where-is-all-the-money-going-to-come-from/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/german-stocks/the-bank-bailouts-are-very-well-intended-but-where-is-all-the-money-going-to-come-from/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander Tsirigotis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel's administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austrian Federal Financing Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austrian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank recapitalisations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belarus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNP Paribas SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Heinz Daube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank Ag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bundesbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominique  Strauss-Kahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecuador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe Merrill Lynch & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frankfurt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypo Real Estate Holding AG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bank for Reconstruction and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kazakhstan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuart Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivek Tawadey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529397808101838812.post-5244321639083397303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As every woman who has ever had dealings with a man knows only too well, it is a lot easier for people to make promises than it is for them to keep them. And when Europe's leaders met in Paris on the 12 October, a lot of fine promises (which were all, surely, very well intentioned) were made. The reality of having to live up to them, however, is turning out, as might only have been expected, to be much more complicated.<br /><br />Basically, the kernel of the plan which is now being operationalised seems to have been thrashed out in Washington on 11 October, when key G7 leaders met with Dominique Strauss Kahn of the IMF, and it was decided to try and erect two great firewalls (corta fuegos) - at least as far as Europe is concerned. One of these was to be co-ordinated by the EU governments, and the other by the IMF, who were to act in the East. Both these parties essentially agreed to guarantee the banking systems in the countries for which they took responsibility, so the action, in a sense, moved from the banks (which are now, more or less "safe") to the governments and the IMF (who is ultimately backed by cash from governments), and it is the "safety" of these institutions which is likely to be more or less tested by the markets, with the first trial of strength taking place right now in Iceland.<br /><br />So the big question now is, do these various institutions have the resources to back up their guarantees, should the need arise?<br /><br /><strong>Problem Selling Bonds</strong><br /><br /><br />In this context the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fd782ada-a451-11dd-8104-000077b07658.html">Financial Times had a very interesting article yesterday</a> about the fact that the Austrian government had decided to cancel a bond auction.<br /><br /><blockquote>Austria, one of Europe’s stronger economies, cancelled a bond auction on Monday in the latest sign that European governments are facing increasing problems raising debt in the deepening credit crisis.</blockquote>According to the FT article the difficulties Austria, which has a triple A credit rating, is facing only serves to highlights the extent of the deterioration in the sovereign bond market, where benchmark indicators of credit risk such as the iTraxx index hit fresh record spreads yesterday.<br /><br />Austria now is the third European country to have cancelled a bond offering in the last few weeks - in the Autrian case the markets are getting more and more nervous over the exposure of some of its key banks (Erste, Raffeison) to the mounting disaster over in Eastern Europe - both Hungary and Ukraine received IMF loans this week (see below) and they certainly won't be the last.<br /><br />Austria seems to have dropped its plans for a bond launch next week due to the size of the premiums (spreads) investors seemed likely to demand, although the Austrian Federal Financing Agency did not give any explanation for the decision.<br /><br />Spain, which alos currently has a triple A rating, and Belgium have both cancelled bond offerings in the past month because of the market turbulence, with investors again demanding much higher interest rates than debt managers had bargained for.<br /><br />So really many European governments are now facing similar problems to those their banks faced earlier, they can get finance, but only at rates which they consider to be punitively high (remember, the interest has to be paid for from somewhere, in the present recessionary climate from cuts in services more than probably, since, remember, if we look over at Eastern Europe, investors are very likely to "punish" those governments who try to go down the easy road, and run large fiscal deficits over any length of time).<br /><br /><blockquote>Market conditions have steadily deteriorated in recent days with the best gauge to credit sentiment, the iTraxx investment grade index, which measures the cost to protect bonds against default in Europe, widening to more than 180 basis points, or a cost of €180,000 to insure €10m of debt over five years, on Monday.</blockquote>This is a steep increase since only as recently as Monday of last week, when the index closed at 142 base points. Also the cost of default protection on European companies has risen to record highs this week on investor concern that the global economic slowdown will curb company profits. The Markit iTraxx Europe index of 125 companies with investment-grade ratings fell 3.5 basis points yesterday to 166.5, after hitting a record high on Monday.<br /><br />The FT cites analyst warnings that the there is now a huge quantity of government debt building up in the pipeline, and the government bonds due to be issued in the fourth quarter and early next year will only add to the problems some countries are facing, and particularly those countries like Greece and Italy who already carrying large amounts of debt that needs to be refinanced or rolled over.<br /><br />It has been estimated that European government bond issuance will rise to record levels of more than €1,000bn in 2009 – 30 per cent higher than 2008 – as governments seek to stimulate their economies and pay for bank recapitalisations.<br /><br /><blockquote>The eurozone countries will raise €925bn ($1,200bn) in 2009, according to Barclays Capital. The UK, which is expected to increase its bond issuance from the current €137.5bn in the 2008-09 financial year, will take the figure above €1,000bn.</blockquote><br /><br />Italy, and Greece, both with a debt-to-GDP ratios of over 100 percent, are certainly the most exposed to continuing difficulties in the credit markets, (with analysts forecasting that Italy alone will need to raise €220bn in 2009). At the present time the <a href="http://italyeconomicinfo.blogspot.com/2008/10/colonialism-goes-into-reverse-gear-as.html">Libyans are lending the Italian government a helping hand</a> (and <a href="http://italyeconomicinfo.blogspot.com/2008/10/unicredit-stays-in-news.html">here</a>) in struggling forward, but even oil rich Libya doesn't have the money to fund the long term needs of the Italian banking, health and pension systems.<br /><br /><strong>IMF Have Only $250 Billion</strong><br /><br /><br />On the other hand <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&#38;sid=auEPqDcSNysg&#38;refer=latin_america">Bloomberg had an article yesterday</a> on the growing pressure on the IMF's somewhat limited resources, as one country after another in Central and Eastern Europe joins the "consultation queue" in the hope of getting a bail out.<br /><br />Bloomberg report that the cost of default protection on bonds sold by 11 emerging-market nations has now either approached or surpassed distress levels, raising the very immediate likelihood that the International Monetary Fund's ability to bailout countries may soon start to be put to the test.<br /><br />Credit-default swaps on eight countries including Pakistan, Argentina and Russia have now passed the 1,000 basis points mark, the level which is normally considered to signify "distress", according to data provided by CMA Datavision. Funding one basis point on a contract protecting $10 million of debt from default for five years is equivalent to $1,000 a year.<br /><br /><blockquote>``The resources of the IMF may not be sufficient for wider bailouts if needed,'' said Vivek Tawadey, head of credit strategy at BNP Paribas SA in London. ``If it can't raise the money, some of the more distressed emerging markets could end up defaulting.'' </blockquote>Ukraine, Hungary, and Iceland have already received IMF loans, while the fund is currently in "consultation" talks with Belarus, Turkey, Latvia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria and Pakistan, at the very least.<br /><br />According to Simon Johnson, former chief economist at the fund the IMF only has up to $250 billion it can currently lend (as quoted in the Financial Times yesterday).<br /><br />Credit-default swaps on Pakistan currently cost 4,412 basis points. Contracts on Argentina are at 3,650 basis points, Ukraine at 2,850, Venezuela at 2,400 and Ecuador costs 2,072. Default protection on Russia, Indonesia and Kazakhstan also costs more than 1,000 basis points, while Iceland costs 921, Latvia 850 and Vietnam 837. Contracts on Turkey cost 725 basis points.<br /><br /><br />The IMF agreed at the weekend to lend Ukraine $16.5 billion for 24 months and stated yesterday that they would contribute $12.5 billion towards a $25.5 billion loan for Hungary (with the other participants being the EU and the World Bank. Iceland got a $2 billion loan on Oct. 24 and Belarus has asked for at least $2 billion. Just how many more loans are now in the pipeline, and if the IMF does start to see its funds stretched, just who exactly is going to step up to the plate and fork the necessary money out? The sheer fact that they only put part of the cash for the Hungarian loan, and that the World Bank had to come on board with a symbolic $1 billion shows they are already aware that the problem may arise.<br /><br /><strong>Update</strong><br /><br />Well just after writing this, <a href="http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto102820082216558928">I see from reading the FT</a> that Gordon Brown got there just before me. Beaten by a short head!<br /><br /><blockquote>Gordon Brown on Tuesday spearheaded calls for a multi-billion pound "bail-out fund" to prevent the global crisis spreading to more countries, and warned of the need to stabilise economies "across eastern Europe".....<br /><br />The prime minister on Tuesday urged the oil-rich Gulf states and China to provide "substantial" funding to the International Monetary Fund, before flying to France for talks on an increase to the European Union's bail-out fund.  The government is keen to emphasise the link between global action and domestic voters' interests, as well as portraying Mr Brown as a world leader.<br /><br />The prime minister said it was "in every nation's interests and the interests of hard-working families in our country and other countries that financial contagion does not spread". While he did not rule out the UK making a contribution, he insisted the "biggest part can be played by the countries that have got the biggest [balance of payments] surpluses".<br /><br />The IMF's $250bn (£158bn) bail-out fund "may not be enough" to prevent the crisis destabilising more countries, Mr Brown said. His spokesman added the UK was "looking at a figure in the hundreds of billions of dollars" for the IMF. Mr Brown called for "action on this new fund immediately".</blockquote><br /><br />Also, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&#38;sid=apemzTQl4ilg&#38;refer=germany">another story in Bloomberg</a> gives us a further glimpse of how the EU governments are planning to do all that financing. The German government, it seems, is going to print IOUs (sorry, bonds) and give them directly to the banks. That is, they are not going to auction bonds and give the proceeds, they are simply giving the paper, and presumeably paying a coupon (or interest). Oh yes, and the bonds will not be sellable, since this would, of course, damage the yield curve via the supply and demand process, but they will count as debt, which means that the German government is being very naieve here (assuming the report is accurate) since of course the rise in the debt may well mean a breach of the 2011 balanced-books commitment, and falling back on this will almost inevitably have an impact on the extra implied risk investors will be looking to get paid for holding the bonds.<br /><br /><blockquote>Germany plans to finance part of its 500 billion euro ($636 billion) bank rescue package by issuing bonds to banks in exchange for new preferred stock, according to Finance Agency head Carl Heinz Daube. <br /><br />``The banks will not be allowed to sell the injected government bonds,'' Daube said in an interview in Tokyo today. ``So far there's obviously not a huge demand for any rescue measures, but this might change in the coming weeks.'' <br /><br />Germany's rescue plan, approved by lawmakers on Oct. 17, amounts to about 20 percent of the gross domestic product of Europe's biggest economy. Chancellor Angela Merkel's administration pledged 80 billion euros to recapitalize distressed banks, with the rest allocated to cover loan guarantees and losses. <br /><br />....Hypo Real Estate Holding AG, the Munich-based lender that's already had a 50 billion euro bailout, today asked the Deutsche Bundesbank for 15 billion euros to cover short-term liquidity needs. ....Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank AG may also need 8.9 billion euros of new capital, more than any bank in Europe, Merrill Lynch &#38; Co. analysts Stuart Graham and Alexander Tsirigotis wrote on Oct. 20. <br /><br />The bailout plan is still being discussed in Berlin and more information will probably be released at the end of this week, Daube said. <br /><br />Germany may meet additional funding needs for its bank rescue by selling six-month bills before examining options for borrowing using longer-term securities, Daube said. The government plans to offer between 212 billion euros and 215 billion euros of debt through its 2009 program, about the same as the 213 billion euros scheduled for this year. <br /><br />The debt-for-equity swap will probably have ``next to no effect'' on the country's yield curve because the notes offered to banks won't trade in the so-called secondary market, he said. The yield curve plots the rates of government bonds according to their maturities, and increases indicate higher borrowing costs. <br /><br />``The government deficit of course will increase, the outstanding volume of bonds will increase as well,'' Daube said. ``The number of outstanding bonds available in the secondary market will stay exactly the same.'' </blockquote><br /><br />Gentlemen, we are out of our depth here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/german-stocks/the-bank-bailouts-are-very-well-intended-but-where-is-all-the-money-going-to-come-from/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russia&#8217;s Crisis Spreads Right Across The Domestic Credit Market</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/russias-crisis-spreads-right-across-the-domestic-credit-market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/russias-crisis-spreads-right-across-the-domestic-credit-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice in Wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrei Molchanov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bnp Paribas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank felt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerzbank AG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe's tallest building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe's tallest skyscraper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federation Tower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frankfurt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imported products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ING Groep NV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[longest rail network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSR Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[main expressed concern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing Output Falls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mirax Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monaco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSCI Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Wealth Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OAO Sberbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail lending market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RUB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sberbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sistema-Hals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Petersburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Poors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-run development bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Treasuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VEB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vladimir putin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir Yevtushenkov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VTB Bank Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VTB Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-3138843050671192999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: Barcelona<br /><br />Well the action in Russia this week has moved on slightly, and the damage has started to spread from pressure on the domestic stock market (accompanied by capital flight) to the real economy - via a very rapid tightening in credit conditions for Russian domestic users. We are also seeing a rapid slowdown in Russian manufacturing industry as internal demand slows while the inflation-driven decline in cost competitiveness continues to make imported products (where available) an attractive alternative to the home produced variant.<br /><br />Emerging-market bonds have been generally falling this week as the U.S. Senate's approval of a $700 billion bank rescue package did little to revive demand for riskier debt, and Russia has, unsurprisingly, been among the worst affected. The extra yield investors demand to own developing-nation bonds rather than U.S. Treasuries rose 8 basis points yestreday to 4.14 percentage points after widening 12 basis points on Wednesday, according to the JPMorgan Chase EMBI+ index. At the same time the MSCI Emerging Markets Index of stocks fell 0.3 percent to 783.79, its lowest point in four days. While such data readouts do not of course exclusively define the outlook for the Russian economy, they do give us a good indication of  the context within which economic activity occurs, and they also give us a very clear measure of the current level of global risk sentiment whose influence, as we will see below, lies right at the heart of the immediate shock that is hitting Russian households and businesses.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Central Bank Reserves Actually Rise</strong><br /><br />One indication of the slightly different panorama to be found in Russia this week - and of the way in which the recent government intervention is moving the focal point of the crisis away from the equity markets and into the credit ones - is to be found in the little detail that the dollar value of Russia's international reserves actually rose $3.4 billion last week, following consecutive declines during each of the three previous weeks, according to data released this week by Bank Rosii. The value of Russia's Forex reserves increased to $562.8 billion in the week to Sept. 26, after decreasing $900 million to $559.4 billion in the previous week. A significant decline in the value of the dollar (which only represents about 47% of the reserves basket) seems to have been behind what is really a technical revaluation - given that the effect is produced by the rest of the currencies in the basket rising in value against the dollar. But there is no doubting the fact that the capital flight has - for the time being - lost momentum, even though the central bank felt forced to sell an estimated $4.9 billion from the reserves last week to support the ruble, and an estimated $20.6 billion over the last four weeks.<br /><br />About 47 percent of Russia's reserves are held in U.S. dollars, 42 percent in euros, 10 percent in pounds and 1 percent in yen, according to the most recent figures released by the central bank on June 30, 2007. The share of the reserves held in Swiss francs was reported as being "insignificant''.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Moody's Dowgrades Russian Banks</strong><br /><br /><br />But while the bloodletting on the foreign exchange side seems to have abated for the time being - PNB Paribas estmated that some $57 billion were taken out of the country between Aug. 8 and Sept. 19, BNP Paribas - the outlook for Russia's banking system has deteriorated significantly after been downgraded to a "negative'' rating by Moody's Investors Services last week.<br /><br />Slowing asset growth, higher inflation and a decline in equities may constitute as lethal cocktail which produce a sytematic deterioration in the undelying fundamental of Russian banks, is the conclusion many investors are drawing from Moody's latest "Banking System Outlook for Russia" report. Moody's main expressed concern was the way in which Russian banks hadn't cut back their lending in response to the recent change in risk sentiment, thus increasing their risk profile. The "structural weaknesses'' that surfaced this month in Russia's banking system and the possible impact of the global credit squeeze may hurt the ability of banks to repay debt and attract financing, Moody's said in the report. Both OAO Sberbank and VTB Group, Russia's biggest banks, declined following the issuing of the Moody's report.  Indeed only this morning (Friday) VTB shares have fallen back one more time, after the bank announced it lost 9.31 billion rubles ($360 million) in September due to ``negative market dynamics.''  Nine-month net income for the bank  (under Russian accounting standards) fell to 7.44 billion rubles from the 16.8 billion rubles in the first eight months of the year declared in August. The drop followed a  "revaluation of the bank's securities portfolio,'' according to the accompanying statement.<br /><br />And the other main credit rating agencies have not exactly been silent, with Fitch stating earlier this month that Russian real estate and construction companies are the most at risk as domestic and international banks curb lending, while Russia's credit outlook was cut to "stable'' from "positive'' by Standard &#38; Poor's on Sept. 19. S&#38;P's made the point that the Russian authorities face growing pressure to spend the country's oil generated reserve funds, undermining the country's longer term credit strength. They did however maintain Russia's rating of BBB+, the third- lowest investment grade ranking.<br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>Lending Conditions Tighten</strong><br /><br /><br />Of course the result of these downgrades (coming hard on the heels of the loss of confidence in the ability of the Russian institutional system to reform itself) wasn't hard to anticipate or slow in coming, and Russia's largest lender, the state-controlled, Sberbank reported on Wednesday that it was going to raise interest rates on retail loans due to the sharp rise in its own borrowing costs. This would seem to be the first major trickle-down from the global financial turmoil onto ordinary Russian citizens, who are already struggling to see the wood from the trees under the impact of double-digit inflation rates. The point about Russia's 15% inflation rate isn't simply the "Alice in Wonderland" quality it has given to Russia's recent growth spurt, what we need to think about is the way in which it distorts all those fundamental day to day decisions which the economy's principal actors (households, companies and the government) need to take. Thus, there is much more to think about in the Russian context than the evident fact that it is a "resource rich country": long term structural distortions which go unattended are never good news.<br /><br />And with 32 percent of the retail lending market, Sberbank's move will have a rapid impact on millions of ordinary Russians - since interest rates on loans are set to rise by anything between 0.25-2.25 percentage points, depending on the type of loan, and the quality of the collateral offered as guarantee. And, of course, the other consumer banks are all set to follow Sberbank's lead in adjusting their lending conditions.<br /><br />Sberbank is reported to be in the process of securing a $1.2 billion loan which will be 40 basis points more expensive than its last syndicated loan - a $750 million credit taken out in December 2007, before the impact of the credit crunch was really felt. Sberbank has said it will start passing these extra costs on to new customers immediately, while loan agreements that have already been signed will remain unchanged.<br /><br />Hardest hit will be rates on mortgage loans taken out in roubles, which will increase by 1.25-2.25 percentage points, while rates for mortgages in foreign currencies will go up between 0.75-1.75 percentage points. Thus interest charged on these loans will rise to between 12.75 and 15.5 percent, depending on the type of collateral and other factors. Interest on other consumer loans - such as cash loans or for consumer durables - will be up by an estimated 1 percentage point on average.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Property Market Starts To Crash</strong><br /><br /><br />And the trickle-down on loans is rapidly becoming a torrent on the mortgages front. One of the first casualties here would seem to be Moscow's decade-long building boom as the sharp rise in interest rates squeezes developers in what has suddenly become the world's third most expensive property market - bettered only by Monaco and London, according to Global Property Guide.<br /><br />The case of the Mirax Group - the Moscow-based company that's building the Federation Tower, which will be Europe's tallest skyscraper when completed - is typical, since Mirax have just had to cancel plans to develop 10 million square meters (108 million square feet) of commercial and residential space after they found that interest rates on some loans had risen to as high as 25 percent.<br /><br />Higher borrowing costs already are hitting demand for apartments, and Moscow-based Real Estate Market Indicators report that prices may fall in the fourth quarter of 2008 and continue falling in 2009. If this happens it will be the first decline in Moscow property prices in 11 years, they say. The property consultants suggest the drop may reach as much as 30 percent for some types of apartments by the end of 2009. This assertion is very hard to judge, but does give some indication of the kind of decline we may see.<br /><br />Prices for homes in Moscow have risen more than sixfold since 2003. In the first six months of 2008 they were up 25 percent, reaching a record average price of 136,404 rubles ($5,318) per square meter, according to data from Metrinfo.ru, a market research company. Since June prices have climbed another 13 percent.<br /><br />And it isn't just in Moscow that the credit crunch is tightening its grip, Russian developers are also cutting apartment prices in the regions as a decline in mortgage lending lowers demand for housing. According to Russia's regional press, sales of new apartments in Rostov-on-Don are down 40 percent this month from August, while sales in St. Petersburg have fallen by half since the spring. Prices are said to have declined as much as 24 percent as a result.<br /><br />And the investment analysts are hitting Russian real estate hard. JPMorgan advised investors, in a research note this week, to "steer clear'' of Russian real-estate stocks since the Russian property sector is expected to be one of the "hardest hit'' in a global recession, while Unicredit analysts state that "The current situation in Moscow partly resembles Japan's real-estate crisis of the 1990s" - personally I think that this is altogether the wrong comparison, but it does give some idea of the seriousness of the situation.<br /><br />Russia's builders have also started to take a beating. Shares of Sistema-Hals, the property company owned by billionaire Vladimir Yevtushenkov, dropped 25 percent to 75 cents at one point in London trading on Wednesday, touching their lowest level since shares began trading in November 2006, while PIK, the Russian developer with the highest market cap, has lost 78 percent of its value since going ahead with an initial public offering in June 2007. OAO Open Investment, Russia's second-largest publicly traded property company, has declined 52 percent this year. LSR Group, the Russian developer and building-materials maker controlled by billionaire Andrei Molchanov, has fallen 64 percent.<br /><br /><strong>Oh, How Are The Mighty Fallen</strong><br /><br />"The Federation Tower, which is due to be completed by the company in 2010, will be 506 meters (1,660 feet) tall and will replace Commerzbank AG's headquarters in Frankfurt as Europe's tallest building". And this, we may like to ask ourselves, will be a monument to what, exactly?<br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>Russia's Railways Delay Bond Issue</strong><br /><br />In another sign of the way in which the global credit strains are now biting, OAO Russian Railways, Russia's state owned rail monopoly, has said it is going to "hold off'' on selling $7 billion of 30-year bonds due to the turmoil in global financial markets. The company had planned to sell $600 million of Eurobonds by the end of 2008 to finance an upgrade in what is effectively the world's longest rail network. ING Groep NV, Barclays Capital and Morgan Stanley, the financial advisers on the loan, recommended waiting to sell the Eurobonds after they saw investor interest waning while the cost of borrowing surged. The impression that all this creates is that the global wholesale money markets are now firmly, but politely, closing their doors in Russia's face.<br /><br />Back in July, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was busying himself advocating a $525 billion overhaul of Russia's railway system, lauding the rail network as "one of the foundations of Russia's political, social, economic and cultural unity.'' Now, wasn't it Lenin who once said that Russian socialism was nationalisation plus electricity, well Vladimir Putin seems to be suggesting that the new Russian capitalism is lots of public money to support the price of Russian equities plus railways, or words to that effect.<br /><br />In fact the sad reality is, after all those ambitious words have been spoken and forgotten, that the current credit crunch will probably lead OAO Russian railways to reduce spending both this year and next (and after that we'll see), both delaying and reducing the scope of the principal projected projects. Of course, the Russian govenment could fund some of the activity itself from the National Wealth Fund, but wouldn't that be just the kind of activity which S&#38;P's are warning about? At the present time Russian Railways claim to have sufficient funds to pay off their current debt and state that they won't need to tap the state-run development bank VEB for refinancing. The rail operator does, however, have 128 billion rubles of loans and bonds outstanding, including 16 billion rubles worth due next year according to estimates, so the validity and realism of their recent statements looks like it is about to be tested.<br /><br />Moody's Investors Service rates Russian Railways A3, the fourth-lowest investment grade level, while Standard &#38; Poor's rates it one step lower at BBB+.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Russia's Manufacturing Output Falls</strong><br /><br /><br />Obviously the credit crunch and construction slowdown is bound to work its way through to Russia's real economy one of these fine days (as we have already seen in places like Spain and the Baltics), and one early warning sign on this front could be considered to be the recent evolution in Russian industrial output. In fact Russian manufacturing shrank for a second month in September, and in so doing registered its first back-to-back contraction since November 1998, as companies cut jobs and growth in new orders slowed, according to the latest VTB Bank Europe Purchasing Managers Report. The PMI came in at a seasonally adjusted 49.8, compared with 49.4 in August. The August reading was the lowest figure in three and a half years, according to the bank statement. On such indexes a figure above 50 indicates growth while one below 50 indicates a contraction.<br /><br /><p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SORxT5yx5OI/AAAAAAAAIBk/5bkoOr8XzAQ/s1600-h/russia+manufacturing.png"><img style="center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SORxT5yx5OI/AAAAAAAAIBk/5bkoOr8XzAQ/s320/russia+manufacturing.png" border="0" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br />Russia's economic growth is obviously slowing quite quickly - and evidently far more rapidly than the government anticipated - largely due to the impact of the global credit crunch, the downward movement in oil prices and investor reaction to Russia's "go it alone" attitude in international disputes.<br /></p><p>In the present environment inflation is likely to slow quite rapidly, and in September this easing in infaltion was noted in the prices that manufacturers pay and charge, as highlighted in the VTB report: "The rate of increase in prices charged by Russian manufacturers eased for the fifth straight month to its weakest' since at least January 2003".<br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>Oil Output Down</strong><br /><br /><br />And just to cap it all, Russia's oil production also fell in September as companies struggled with costs and maturing fields, effectively bringing the world's second-largest crude exporter closer to its first annual drop in output since 1998. Production fell to 9.83 million barrels of crude a day (40.2 million metric tons a month), 0.4 percent less than a year earlier, according to figures released by the Energy Ministry's CDU-TEK unit.<br /><br />So What Can We Expect?</p><p>Well, in broad outline I don't think the outlook has changed that much from when I wrote <a href="http://russiatooat.blogspot.com/2008/09/is-russia-just-another-emerging-economy.html">my last analysis two weeks ago</a>.</p><p>As I said at that point, Russia is hardly the Baltics, so we should not expect the economy to go into a complete nosedive. A lot depends on the view you take about the future of energy prices. While the global economy is now evidently set to slow considerably - in addition to the reduction in growth rates already seen so far this year -and especially in the aftermath of the most recent bout of financial turmoil. Cleary oil prices are set to drop even further - and this will only keep pushing Russian growth down - but at some point the market will find a floor, possibly in the region of $80 a barrel. More importantly when it comes to the future of oil prices, I would not be banking on some kind of long and deep global recession. Many of those developed economies who are significantly affected by the bursting of their construction booms (and the banking issues which have gone with it) will probably have weak domestic consumer demand for some time to come, but a solid core of emerging economies may well take off again quite rapidly as we move into 2009 -and especially if energy prices drop back, and the current near panic in the financial markets settles down (people do, after all, have to put their money somewhere). So the emergent (and numerous in population terms) emerging economies should give another strong shove to what may have become a rather listless global economy. As a knock on effect this should also serve to put some life back into export dependent economies like Germany and Japan (who by and large are not reeling under the impact of the construction bust, although their banks may have been lending to people who are).</p><p>So the bottom line here, I think, is be ready for a sharp slowdown in headline Russian GDP, but don't expect to see any imminent meltdown in the Russian financial system, one way or another they have the wherewithall at this point to keep limping forward. Of course, in the longer term, well, you know...... </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/russias-crisis-spreads-right-across-the-domestic-credit-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russia&#8217;s Crisis Spreads Right Across The Domestic Credit Market</title>
		<link>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/russias-crisis-spreads-right-across-the-domestic-credit-market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/russias-crisis-spreads-right-across-the-domestic-credit-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice in Wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrei Molchanov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rescue package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bnp Paribas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central bank felt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerzbank AG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe's tallest building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe's tallest skyscraper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federation Tower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frankfurt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imported products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ING Groep NV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jpmorgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[longest rail network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSR Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[main expressed concern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing Output Falls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mirax Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monaco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Investors Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSCI Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Wealth Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OAO Sberbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail lending market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RUB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sberbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sistema-Hals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Petersburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Poors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-run development bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Treasuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VEB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vladimir putin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir Yevtushenkov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VTB Bank Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VTB Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8991369883287712098.post-3138843050671192999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Edward Hugh: Barcelona<br /><br />Well the action in Russia this week has moved on slightly, and the damage has started to spread from pressure on the domestic stock market (accompanied by capital flight) to the real economy - via a very rapid tightening in credit conditions for Russian domestic users. We are also seeing a rapid slowdown in Russian manufacturing industry as internal demand slows while the inflation-driven decline in cost competitiveness continues to make imported products (where available) an attractive alternative to the home produced variant.<br /><br />Emerging-market bonds have been generally falling this week as the U.S. Senate's approval of a $700 billion bank rescue package did little to revive demand for riskier debt, and Russia has, unsurprisingly, been among the worst affected. The extra yield investors demand to own developing-nation bonds rather than U.S. Treasuries rose 8 basis points yestreday to 4.14 percentage points after widening 12 basis points on Wednesday, according to the JPMorgan Chase EMBI+ index. At the same time the MSCI Emerging Markets Index of stocks fell 0.3 percent to 783.79, its lowest point in four days. While such data readouts do not of course exclusively define the outlook for the Russian economy, they do give us a good indication of  the context within which economic activity occurs, and they also give us a very clear measure of the current level of global risk sentiment whose influence, as we will see below, lies right at the heart of the immediate shock that is hitting Russian households and businesses.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Central Bank Reserves Actually Rise</strong><br /><br />One indication of the slightly different panorama to be found in Russia this week - and of the way in which the recent government intervention is moving the focal point of the crisis away from the equity markets and into the credit ones - is to be found in the little detail that the dollar value of Russia's international reserves actually rose $3.4 billion last week, following consecutive declines during each of the three previous weeks, according to data released this week by Bank Rosii. The value of Russia's Forex reserves increased to $562.8 billion in the week to Sept. 26, after decreasing $900 million to $559.4 billion in the previous week. A significant decline in the value of the dollar (which only represents about 47% of the reserves basket) seems to have been behind what is really a technical revaluation - given that the effect is produced by the rest of the currencies in the basket rising in value against the dollar. But there is no doubting the fact that the capital flight has - for the time being - lost momentum, even though the central bank felt forced to sell an estimated $4.9 billion from the reserves last week to support the ruble, and an estimated $20.6 billion over the last four weeks.<br /><br />About 47 percent of Russia's reserves are held in U.S. dollars, 42 percent in euros, 10 percent in pounds and 1 percent in yen, according to the most recent figures released by the central bank on June 30, 2007. The share of the reserves held in Swiss francs was reported as being "insignificant''.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Moody's Dowgrades Russian Banks</strong><br /><br /><br />But while the bloodletting on the foreign exchange side seems to have abated for the time being - PNB Paribas estmated that some $57 billion were taken out of the country between Aug. 8 and Sept. 19, BNP Paribas - the outlook for Russia's banking system has deteriorated significantly after been downgraded to a "negative'' rating by Moody's Investors Services last week.<br /><br />Slowing asset growth, higher inflation and a decline in equities may constitute as lethal cocktail which produce a sytematic deterioration in the undelying fundamental of Russian banks, is the conclusion many investors are drawing from Moody's latest "Banking System Outlook for Russia" report. Moody's main expressed concern was the way in which Russian banks hadn't cut back their lending in response to the recent change in risk sentiment, thus increasing their risk profile. The "structural weaknesses'' that surfaced this month in Russia's banking system and the possible impact of the global credit squeeze may hurt the ability of banks to repay debt and attract financing, Moody's said in the report. Both OAO Sberbank and VTB Group, Russia's biggest banks, declined following the issuing of the Moody's report.  Indeed only this morning (Friday) VTB shares have fallen back one more time, after the bank announced it lost 9.31 billion rubles ($360 million) in September due to ``negative market dynamics.''  Nine-month net income for the bank  (under Russian accounting standards) fell to 7.44 billion rubles from the 16.8 billion rubles in the first eight months of the year declared in August. The drop followed a  "revaluation of the bank's securities portfolio,'' according to the accompanying statement.<br /><br />And the other main credit rating agencies have not exactly been silent, with Fitch stating earlier this month that Russian real estate and construction companies are the most at risk as domestic and international banks curb lending, while Russia's credit outlook was cut to "stable'' from "positive'' by Standard &#38; Poor's on Sept. 19. S&#38;P's made the point that the Russian authorities face growing pressure to spend the country's oil generated reserve funds, undermining the country's longer term credit strength. They did however maintain Russia's rating of BBB+, the third- lowest investment grade ranking.<br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>Lending Conditions Tighten</strong><br /><br /><br />Of course the result of these downgrades (coming hard on the heels of the loss of confidence in the ability of the Russian institutional system to reform itself) wasn't hard to anticipate or slow in coming, and Russia's largest lender, the state-controlled, Sberbank reported on Wednesday that it was going to raise interest rates on retail loans due to the sharp rise in its own borrowing costs. This would seem to be the first major trickle-down from the global financial turmoil onto ordinary Russian citizens, who are already struggling to see the wood from the trees under the impact of double-digit inflation rates. The point about Russia's 15% inflation rate isn't simply the "Alice in Wonderland" quality it has given to Russia's recent growth spurt, what we need to think about is the way in which it distorts all those fundamental day to day decisions which the economy's principal actors (households, companies and the government) need to take. Thus, there is much more to think about in the Russian context than the evident fact that it is a "resource rich country": long term structural distortions which go unattended are never good news.<br /><br />And with 32 percent of the retail lending market, Sberbank's move will have a rapid impact on millions of ordinary Russians - since interest rates on loans are set to rise by anything between 0.25-2.25 percentage points, depending on the type of loan, and the quality of the collateral offered as guarantee. And, of course, the other consumer banks are all set to follow Sberbank's lead in adjusting their lending conditions.<br /><br />Sberbank is reported to be in the process of securing a $1.2 billion loan which will be 40 basis points more expensive than its last syndicated loan - a $750 million credit taken out in December 2007, before the impact of the credit crunch was really felt. Sberbank has said it will start passing these extra costs on to new customers immediately, while loan agreements that have already been signed will remain unchanged.<br /><br />Hardest hit will be rates on mortgage loans taken out in roubles, which will increase by 1.25-2.25 percentage points, while rates for mortgages in foreign currencies will go up between 0.75-1.75 percentage points. Thus interest charged on these loans will rise to between 12.75 and 15.5 percent, depending on the type of collateral and other factors. Interest on other consumer loans - such as cash loans or for consumer durables - will be up by an estimated 1 percentage point on average.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Property Market Starts To Crash</strong><br /><br /><br />And the trickle-down on loans is rapidly becoming a torrent on the mortgages front. One of the first casualties here would seem to be Moscow's decade-long building boom as the sharp rise in interest rates squeezes developers in what has suddenly become the world's third most expensive property market - bettered only by Monaco and London, according to Global Property Guide.<br /><br />The case of the Mirax Group - the Moscow-based company that's building the Federation Tower, which will be Europe's tallest skyscraper when completed - is typical, since Mirax have just had to cancel plans to develop 10 million square meters (108 million square feet) of commercial and residential space after they found that interest rates on some loans had risen to as high as 25 percent.<br /><br />Higher borrowing costs already are hitting demand for apartments, and Moscow-based Real Estate Market Indicators report that prices may fall in the fourth quarter of 2008 and continue falling in 2009. If this happens it will be the first decline in Moscow property prices in 11 years, they say. The property consultants suggest the drop may reach as much as 30 percent for some types of apartments by the end of 2009. This assertion is very hard to judge, but does give some indication of the kind of decline we may see.<br /><br />Prices for homes in Moscow have risen more than sixfold since 2003. In the first six months of 2008 they were up 25 percent, reaching a record average price of 136,404 rubles ($5,318) per square meter, according to data from Metrinfo.ru, a market research company. Since June prices have climbed another 13 percent.<br /><br />And it isn't just in Moscow that the credit crunch is tightening its grip, Russian developers are also cutting apartment prices in the regions as a decline in mortgage lending lowers demand for housing. According to Russia's regional press, sales of new apartments in Rostov-on-Don are down 40 percent this month from August, while sales in St. Petersburg have fallen by half since the spring. Prices are said to have declined as much as 24 percent as a result.<br /><br />And the investment analysts are hitting Russian real estate hard. JPMorgan advised investors, in a research note this week, to "steer clear'' of Russian real-estate stocks since the Russian property sector is expected to be one of the "hardest hit'' in a global recession, while Unicredit analysts state that "The current situation in Moscow partly resembles Japan's real-estate crisis of the 1990s" - personally I think that this is altogether the wrong comparison, but it does give some idea of the seriousness of the situation.<br /><br />Russia's builders have also started to take a beating. Shares of Sistema-Hals, the property company owned by billionaire Vladimir Yevtushenkov, dropped 25 percent to 75 cents at one point in London trading on Wednesday, touching their lowest level since shares began trading in November 2006, while PIK, the Russian developer with the highest market cap, has lost 78 percent of its value since going ahead with an initial public offering in June 2007. OAO Open Investment, Russia's second-largest publicly traded property company, has declined 52 percent this year. LSR Group, the Russian developer and building-materials maker controlled by billionaire Andrei Molchanov, has fallen 64 percent.<br /><br /><strong>Oh, How Are The Mighty Fallen</strong><br /><br />"The Federation Tower, which is due to be completed by the company in 2010, will be 506 meters (1,660 feet) tall and will replace Commerzbank AG's headquarters in Frankfurt as Europe's tallest building". And this, we may like to ask ourselves, will be a monument to what, exactly?<br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>Russia's Railways Delay Bond Issue</strong><br /><br />In another sign of the way in which the global credit strains are now biting, OAO Russian Railways, Russia's state owned rail monopoly, has said it is going to "hold off'' on selling $7 billion of 30-year bonds due to the turmoil in global financial markets. The company had planned to sell $600 million of Eurobonds by the end of 2008 to finance an upgrade in what is effectively the world's longest rail network. ING Groep NV, Barclays Capital and Morgan Stanley, the financial advisers on the loan, recommended waiting to sell the Eurobonds after they saw investor interest waning while the cost of borrowing surged. The impression that all this creates is that the global wholesale money markets are now firmly, but politely, closing their doors in Russia's face.<br /><br />Back in July, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was busying himself advocating a $525 billion overhaul of Russia's railway system, lauding the rail network as "one of the foundations of Russia's political, social, economic and cultural unity.'' Now, wasn't it Lenin who once said that Russian socialism was nationalisation plus electricity, well Vladimir Putin seems to be suggesting that the new Russian capitalism is lots of public money to support the price of Russian equities plus railways, or words to that effect.<br /><br />In fact the sad reality is, after all those ambitious words have been spoken and forgotten, that the current credit crunch will probably lead OAO Russian railways to reduce spending both this year and next (and after that we'll see), both delaying and reducing the scope of the principal projected projects. Of course, the Russian govenment could fund some of the activity itself from the National Wealth Fund, but wouldn't that be just the kind of activity which S&#38;P's are warning about? At the present time Russian Railways claim to have sufficient funds to pay off their current debt and state that they won't need to tap the state-run development bank VEB for refinancing. The rail operator does, however, have 128 billion rubles of loans and bonds outstanding, including 16 billion rubles worth due next year according to estimates, so the validity and realism of their recent statements looks like it is about to be tested.<br /><br />Moody's Investors Service rates Russian Railways A3, the fourth-lowest investment grade level, while Standard &#38; Poor's rates it one step lower at BBB+.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Russia's Manufacturing Output Falls</strong><br /><br /><br />Obviously the credit crunch and construction slowdown is bound to work its way through to Russia's real economy one of these fine days (as we have already seen in places like Spain and the Baltics), and one early warning sign on this front could be considered to be the recent evolution in Russian industrial output. In fact Russian manufacturing shrank for a second month in September, and in so doing registered its first back-to-back contraction since November 1998, as companies cut jobs and growth in new orders slowed, according to the latest VTB Bank Europe Purchasing Managers Report. The PMI came in at a seasonally adjusted 49.8, compared with 49.4 in August. The August reading was the lowest figure in three and a half years, according to the bank statement. On such indexes a figure above 50 indicates growth while one below 50 indicates a contraction.<br /><br /><p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SORxT5yx5OI/AAAAAAAAIBk/5bkoOr8XzAQ/s1600-h/russia+manufacturing.png"><img style="center" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/SORxT5yx5OI/AAAAAAAAIBk/5bkoOr8XzAQ/s320/russia+manufacturing.png" border="0" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br />Russia's economic growth is obviously slowing quite quickly - and evidently far more rapidly than the government anticipated - largely due to the impact of the global credit crunch, the downward movement in oil prices and investor reaction to Russia's "go it alone" attitude in international disputes.<br /></p><p>In the present environment inflation is likely to slow quite rapidly, and in September this easing in infaltion was noted in the prices that manufacturers pay and charge, as highlighted in the VTB report: "The rate of increase in prices charged by Russian manufacturers eased for the fifth straight month to its weakest' since at least January 2003".<br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>Oil Output Down</strong><br /><br /><br />And just to cap it all, Russia's oil production also fell in September as companies struggled with costs and maturing fields, effectively bringing the world's second-largest crude exporter closer to its first annual drop in output since 1998. Production fell to 9.83 million barrels of crude a day (40.2 million metric tons a month), 0.4 percent less than a year earlier, according to figures released by the Energy Ministry's CDU-TEK unit.<br /><br />So What Can We Expect?</p><p>Well, in broad outline I don't think the outlook has changed that much from when I wrote <a href="http://russiatooat.blogspot.com/2008/09/is-russia-just-another-emerging-economy.html">my last analysis two weeks ago</a>.</p><p>As I said at that point, Russia is hardly the Baltics, so we should not expect the economy to go into a complete nosedive. A lot depends on the view you take about the future of energy prices. While the global economy is now evidently set to slow considerably - in addition to the reduction in growth rates already seen so far this year -and especially in the aftermath of the most recent bout of financial turmoil. Cleary oil prices are set to drop even further - and this will only keep pushing Russian growth down - but at some point the market will find a floor, possibly in the region of $80 a barrel. More importantly when it comes to the future of oil prices, I would not be banking on some kind of long and deep global recession. Many of those developed economies who are significantly affected by the bursting of their construction booms (and the banking issues which have gone with it) will probably have weak domestic consumer demand for some time to come, but a solid core of emerging economies may well take off again quite rapidly as we move into 2009 -and especially if energy prices drop back, and the current near panic in the financial markets settles down (people do, after all, have to put their money somewhere). So the emergent (and numerous in population terms) emerging economies should give another strong shove to what may have become a rather listless global economy. As a knock on effect this should also serve to put some life back into export dependent economies like Germany and Japan (who by and large are not reeling under the impact of the construction bust, although their banks may have been lending to people who are).</p><p>So the bottom line here, I think, is be ready for a sharp slowdown in headline Russian GDP, but don't expect to see any imminent meltdown in the Russian financial system, one way or another they have the wherewithall at this point to keep limping forward. Of course, in the longer term, well, you know...... </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.straightstocks.com/global-economics/russias-crisis-spreads-right-across-the-domestic-credit-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
