Get Articles Daily from StraightStocks - Enter Email Address


  • National Debt Clock


The New “New Deal” – Analyst Blog

Source: http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/16699/The+New+%22New+Deal%22+-+Analyst+Blog
Posted on Thursday, January 8th, 2009 | In Stocks to Watch
Contributed by: Dirk Van Dijk (http://www.zacks.com/) -

The Obama stimulus package, now provisionally set at about $775 billion over two years, but sure to grow as it makes its way through the halls of Congress, has in many quarters been compared to FDR’s New Deal of the 1930s. Certainly the economic conditions facing Obama more closely match those faced by FDR (although not as dire) than those faced by any of the postwar presidents. The only two post-war downturns of comparable magnitude were quite different animals, particularly on the inflation front.

One of the themes we will see as the package gets debated — particularly by those who think there is wisdom to be found in the editorial pages of The Wall Street Journal – is that “The New Deal didn’t work; only WWII solved the Depression.” This is, in fact, complete and utter hogwash. The New Deal was extremely effective, particularly while the economic stimulus was active.

The economy enjoyed extremely high rates of growth during FDR’s first term, and only slipped back into recession in 1937 as FDR pulled back from spending over fears about the budget deficit. The graph below shows two of the best measures of economic growth during the 1930’s — namely, real GDP growth (available only annually back then) and the year-over-year growth in Industrial Production.

For comparison, the second graph shows the growth during what the Wall Street Journal editorial-board-types think was the golden age of America, the 1980’s. The GDP data for the 1980’s is quarterly.

Both periods started from periods where the economy had been in distress, although the cause in the latter period was due to tight monetary policies designed to wring high inflation out of the system. Clearly the system had suffered more in the pre-New Deal period, with industrial production falling at double digit rates for several years rather than the brief period of contraction of more than 5% during the early years of the Reagan Revolution.

However, take a good look at the scales of the two graphs. Under FDR, industrial production soared initially at a year-over-year rate of greater than 60%, and real GDP growth stayed in the double-digit positive territory for over 3 years in a row. The best industrial production growth that was achieved in the 1980’s was a brief period of about 12%, with real GDP growth of around 8% for a short time.

All in all, from the objective data, one must conclude that the New Deal was a great success.


Zacks Investment Research

Last 5 posts by Dirk Van Dijk





About Dirk Van Dijk (http://www.zacks.com/)
Dirk Van Dijk is a Senior Analyst at Zacks Investment Research. He writes the Earnings Trends article on Zacks.com which provides investors with an in-depth analysis of the markets, along with the profit performance of S&P 500 companies. Each week, this report identifies which S&P 500 sectors are showing strength and which are showing weakness. In addition, this valuable report highlights the most attractive sectors based on valuation and projected earnings growth. For more information, visit www.zacks.com or for the RSS Feed of this article: http://www.zacks.com/external/rss.php?f=34

Leave a Reply

Name

Email (kept private)

Website









No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.