Get Articles Daily from StraightStocks - Enter Email Address


  • National Debt Clock


Watchdog Agency Says TARP Overpaid $78 Billion for Bank Assets

Posted on Friday, February 6th, 2009 | In Market Commentary
Contributed by: Money Morning (http://moneymorning.com) -

The watchdog agency overseeing the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) said Friday that the Treasury Department paid banks $78 billion more for assets than they were worth.

The Congressional Oversight Panel said the Treasury dispersed $254 billion for capital purchases of bank assets worth about $176 billion under the TARP program.

“The loss estimate is conservative,” said House Financial Services Committee member Rep. Alan Grayson, (F-Fla.). “It could turn out that those assets in the end are worthless.”

The $700 billion TARP program has been under scrutiny since it began in October because of a general lack of understanding of how the program is being run and where the money is going.

Sign up below…
and we’ll send you a new investment report for free:

“Credit Crisis Report.”


The congressional report is the latest in a series of revelations about the taxpayer-provided bailout money. An ongoing investigation by Money Morning has detailed how banks have used the first $350 billion: They’ve used the capital to finance investments in other banks and to pay bonuses to executives. Then they audaciously refused to say where the money went, or how it was used, Money Morning has shown.

The Congressional Oversight Committee detailed what the Treasury has spent so far in the TARP program.  In addition to the $194.2 billion spent on direct equity investments in banks, $40 billion funded a program to shore up American International Group, Inc. (AIG), $52.5 billion was set aside to stabilize Citigroup, Inc. (C) and Bank of America Corp. (BAC), and $20.8 billion was earmarked for Detroit automakers.

Neil Barofsky, TARP’s special inspector general, said in congressional testimony Thursday that he will ask companies to detail their planned use of the funds, including how they will comply with executive compensation rules. He will also ask the companies to document how the funds were used and to give the inspector general’s office accuracy certifications, Forbes reported.

“The most significant failing from a transparency standpoint: Understanding the process and criteria Treasury used to decide who would receive TARP funds and what the recipients have done with the hundreds of billions of dollars that have been invested,” Barofsky said.

The public’s stake in the nation’s banking system continues to mushroom as President Barack Obama’s team works to pull the economy out of the deepest recession in at least two generations. TARP, which is part of the $8.5 trillion the government has pledged to stabilize the economy, has guaranteed $350 billion to banks and the auto industry so far, with another $350 billion set to be allocated in coming months.

“Our money – and our economy – are on the line, and we all have a stake in the outcome,” Harvard Law School professor Elizabeth Warren told the Senate Banking Committee. Warren heads the five-member congressional oversight panel overseeing TARP.

So far, TARP hasn’t succeeded in clearing bad assets from banks’ balance sheets, which would allow the companies to lend money and get the economy going again, Gregory Miller, chief economist at Sun Trust Banks Inc. (STI), told Bloomberg News.

“It hasn’t cleaned up the asset side of bank balance sheets and it hasn’t helped bank uncertainty about bank balance sheets at all,” Miller said. “Uncertainty has now overwhelmed economic decision making.”

The lack of transparency has put TARP administrators on the defensive.  Neel Kashkari, appointed by the Bush administration to run TARP, on Dec. 5 told the Mortgage Bankers Association that the government isn’t “looking for a return tomorrow.”

“We are looking to try to stabilize the financial system, get credit flowing again, and over time, we believe that the taxpayers will be protected and have a return on their investment,” he said.

Indeed, former Treasury Secretary Paulson, who was succeeded last month by Timothy Geithner, originally promoted TARP as a possible moneymaker.

“This is an investment, not an expenditure, and there is no reason to expect this program will cost taxpayers anything,” Paulson said Oct. 20.

Last 5 posts by Money Morning





About Money Morning (http://moneymorning.com)
Money Moves the Markets; Money Morning Lets You Move First

We’re in the midst of the greatest investing boom in almost 60 years. And rest assured - this boom is not about to end anytime soon.

You see, the “flattening of the world” continues to spawn new markets worth trillions of dollars; new customers that measure in the billions; an insatiable global demand for basic resources that’s growing exponentially ; and a technological revolution even in the most distant markets on the planet.

The bottom line is this: With U.S. influence slipping, and the dollar declining as well, investors who think too narrowly about this transformation will face years of meager returns. But those who embrace this new global reality can make themselves very wealthy.

# Over the next 25 years, America’s share of the worldwide economic pie will slip from 28% to 24%…

# Even as Asia’s share almost doubles ;which means it will account for a whopping 55% of the global economy by 2030.

The big brokerage firms are making a killing on the global boom. Yet Wall Street reserves the timeliest information - and the best profit opportunities - for its partners or wealthiest clients. And the Securities and Exchange Commission doesn’t help the everyday investor much either. The second sad fact is this: While you can buy any U.S. or Canadian stock you want, the SEC prohibits you from purchasing many of the available international stocks.

The reason: Foreign companies that haven’t registered with the SEC are off-limits to most U.S. individual investors.

Our worldwide research staff includes former investment bankers, international financiers, emerging markets specialists and veteran financial journalists.

Our experts know that certain capital flows essentially act as a “leading indicator” of future profit opportunities. These are opportunities that you won’t be reading or hearing about anywhere else.

Each weekday morning, in a readable style you can digest in just a few minutes, you will reap the benefits of our research and expert experiences. Indeed, Money Morning will bring you: # The latest reports on China, Japan, Emerging Europe, and the other global hot spots where most investor wealth will be created in the months and years to come…

# Reports on companies you’ve likely never heard of - even though they’re poised to sell billions worth of their wares to “new middle class” customers around the world…

# Information on the U.S. companies shrewd enough to cash in on this boom in global;

# The latest developments in banking, interest rates, foreign investment and other global investing topics;

# Advice on how to invest in currencies, precious metals, commodities and energy

# Inside news on the hottest investments, including water, uranium and private equity…

# And news on rules and regulations, financial trends and strategies - and any other “market intelligence” that you will need to become a shrewd-and-successful investor in the greatest global investing boom most of us will ever see.

Money does move markets. But Money Morning lets you move first.

Leave a Reply

Name

Email (kept private)

Website









No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.