The Truth about the Bank ‘Fudge Tests’
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ContrarianProfits/~3/wgWvxExgI28/16334Posted on Wednesday, May 6th, 2009 | In Market Commentary
“The data we have are accurate reflections of the financial conditions of those banks,” says Fed head Ben Bernanke regarding the stress test results… Hmmm…
Didn’t Bernanke also recently lean on BoA CEO Ken Lewis to commit securities fraud by not declaring losses at Merrill Lynch prior to its takeover by BoA? We appreciate that Gentle Ben is just doing his job and all. But does he really think we’re going to trust him following the Merrill-BoA episode?
We don’t believe a word Bernanke says about the economy… or about banks. As NYU economics professor Nouriel Roubini put it recently, the stress tests (or “fudge tests” as he calls them) aren’t worth the paper they’re written on. They’re meaningless, because they have been reverse engineered to create positive results. Here’s Roubini on the subject:
If you look at the actual data today macro data for Q1 on the three variables used in the stress tests – growth rate, unemployment rate, and home price depreciation – are already worse than those in U.S. government baseline scenario for 2009 AND even worse than those for the more adverse stressed scenario for 2009. Thus, the stress test results are meaningless as actual data are already running worse than the worst case scenario.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb, a scholar of risk and chance at Polytechnic Institute of New York University, author of The Black Swan:
The Impact of the Highly Improbable: “This stress test is the equivalent of testing the Brooklyn Bridge by running a single heavy truck on it.”
Last 5 posts by Contrarian Profits
- Gold – Not the end, but possibly a correction - November 24th, 2009
- How do retail sales stack up in an atypical recovery? - November 24th, 2009
- The Best Energy Investments in the World - November 23rd, 2009
- Transportation Sector: powered by recovery - November 23rd, 2009
- The Dollar, the Euro, and being Bullish on Gold - November 20th, 2009
ben bernanke, Brooklyn Bridge;, contrarian profits, Federal Reserve System, Ken Lewis, Market Commentary, Merrill Lynch, new york university, Nicholas Taleb, nouriel roubini, NYU, Polytechnic Institute, United States, Us Government



ContrarianProfits.com is a financial news and opinion website with a twist. As investment guru Rick Rule puts it, “You are either a contrarian or a victim.” In the financial world, most people are losers because they just don’t know what game they’re playing. They think they can just get “into the market” along with everyone else, do what everyone else does, and they will make money. Not likely. By the time you’ve paid commissions, spreads, fees, taxes – and suffered the consequences of inflation – you’ll be very lucky just to have as much money as you started with.
ContrarianProfits.com is a contrarian site, in the sense that we provide ideas, opinions and recommendations that often run counter to the mainstream financial press. We do this not just to be contrary, but because we’ve realized that Rick is right. You don’t make money by following the crowd; you make money by leading it.
Why is this so? Well, it’s obvious that if you do the same thing everyone else does you’ll get the same results everyone else gets. On average, and over the long run, real investment returns for the typical investor cannot exceed the rate of growth of the economy itself. Everybody can’t get richer faster than everybody else. Real economic growth in the US today averages about 3% per year; if you don’t make any mistakes, that’s about what you can expect. Few people may be satisfied with 3% per year, but most feel comfortable in the middle of the financial herd and are happy to take whatever that gets them. If you’re one of those people, you will probably not like our site. It will make you uncomfortable.
If, on the other hand, you’re willing to look at things a little differently, you’ll appreciate the views of many of our columnists, contributors and visionaries.