Is Goldman Sachs Controlling Washington?
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ContrarianProfits/~3/RC3TWj7_oeA/16198Posted on Monday, May 4th, 2009 | In Market Commentary
Contrary to the prevailing analysis, we believe that the Obama and Bush administration insistence on protecting banks at the expense of the taxpayer is the result of a Machiavellian effort by Goldman Sachs and other major banks to influence U.S. economic policy by infiltrating the corridors of power.
Today, we duly note that Goldman Sachs has just hired former Barney Frank staffer Michael Paese to be its top Washington lobbyist. This position was formerly held by Mark Patterson, the current chief of staff at the Treasury.
Pease and Patterson are not the only ones to pass through the revolving door between Washington and Goldman. Bush’s Treasury secretary, Hank “The Hammer” Paulson is a former Goldman CEO. And his replacement, Tim Geithner, was mentored by Gerald Corrigan, a former New York Fed president and current partner and managing director of the Office of the Chairman of Goldman Sachs.
Who else was President Obama considering for Treasury secretary? Former Goldman hotshots Robert Rubin and Jon Corzine (now the governor of New Jersey).
Are other Goldman alumni close to government? Just a few… Ed Liddy, who the government appointed as CEO of AIG was Goldman’s vice chairman. World Bank president Robert Zoellick was a managing director. Neel Kashkari (an appropriate surname for a government bagman if ever there was one), the 35-year-old overseer of the TARP program was a vice president. And Geithner’s replacement as president of the New York Fed, William C. Dudley, is also a former Goldman employee.
Oh… and Robert Rubin was Treasury secretary under President Clinton. And former Goldman senior partner Stephen Friedman headed Bush’s National Economic Council in the first term. And Josh Bolton, another former Goldman golden boy, served as White House chief of staff under Bush.
The former CEO of the NYSE, John Thain, is also a Goldman alumnus. And his replacement, Duncan Niederauer, spent 22 years of his career at the bank.
Of course, these high-level appointments are probably just coincidental. Just as it was probably coincidental that on September 15, 2008, then New York Fed president Tim Geithner pressed for AIG’s biggest counterparty, Goldman Sachs, to help the insurer raise capital after it became clear that AIG was at risk of going bankrupt. And that on the same day Goldman’s current CEO, Lloyd Blankfein, was at the New York Fed. And that Goldman ended up in receipt of about $12 billion in tax dollars thanks to AIG’s wholesale credit-default swap unwinds after the government bailed out the insurance giant.
Oh… and which bank’s employees were among the largest donors to President Obama’s recent campaign, giving more than $884,000? You guessed it…
If it’s a conspiracy to believe that Goldman Sachs gets preferential treatment from White House administrations that are 1) in receipt of major funding from Goldman Sachs employees and 2) populated by former Goldman Sachs insiders, we’d love to know what the official explanation is.
Goldman’s close ties with Washington are important because during the recent “junk-stock rally” that has pushed up the value of bank stocks and taken pressure off a beleaguered White House, Goldman has been by far the biggest program trader by volume on the NYSE (where former Goldman boy Niederauer is CEO). And when we say by far the biggest, we mean by far the biggest.
As you can see from the above chart, last week latest Goldman Sachs traded for their principal account (i.e. using the bank’s own funds) more than the next 14 largest institutions in the world combined! Goldman traded 1,028,100,000 shares versus 953,000,000 for all other reporting institutions.
Last 5 posts by Contrarian Profits
- How do retail sales stack up in an atypical recovery? - November 24th, 2009
- The Best Energy Investments in the World - November 23rd, 2009
- Transportation Sector: powered by recovery - November 23rd, 2009
- The Dollar, the Euro, and being Bullish on Gold - November 20th, 2009
- Audit the Fed – Amendment to a $200 billion bill frightens currency traders! - November 20th, 2009
Aig, Bank, Bank Stocks, Barney Frank, Bush, bush administration, Bush's National Economic Council;, Clinton, contrarian profits, Duncan Niederauer;, Ed Liddy;, Gerald Corrigan;, Goldman Sachs, Goldman Sachs Controlling Washington;, Hank, Insurance Giant, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, John Thain, Jon Corzine;, Josh Bolton;, Lloyd Blankfein, Mark Patterson;, Market Commentary, Michael Paese;, Neel Kashkari, New Jersey, new york fed, nyse, obama, Pease;, program trader;, Robert Rubin, Robert Zoellick, Stephen Friedman;, Tim Geithner;, United States, USD, Washington, White House, William C. Dudley;
ContrarianProfits.com is a financial news and opinion website with a twist. As investment guru Rick Rule puts it, “You are either a contrarian or a victim.” In the financial world, most people are losers because they just don’t know what game they’re playing. They think they can just get “into the market” along with everyone else, do what everyone else does, and they will make money. Not likely. By the time you’ve paid commissions, spreads, fees, taxes – and suffered the consequences of inflation – you’ll be very lucky just to have as much money as you started with.
ContrarianProfits.com is a contrarian site, in the sense that we provide ideas, opinions and recommendations that often run counter to the mainstream financial press. We do this not just to be contrary, but because we’ve realized that Rick is right. You don’t make money by following the crowd; you make money by leading it.
Why is this so? Well, it’s obvious that if you do the same thing everyone else does you’ll get the same results everyone else gets. On average, and over the long run, real investment returns for the typical investor cannot exceed the rate of growth of the economy itself. Everybody can’t get richer faster than everybody else. Real economic growth in the US today averages about 3% per year; if you don’t make any mistakes, that’s about what you can expect. Few people may be satisfied with 3% per year, but most feel comfortable in the middle of the financial herd and are happy to take whatever that gets them. If you’re one of those people, you will probably not like our site. It will make you uncomfortable.
If, on the other hand, you’re willing to look at things a little differently, you’ll appreciate the views of many of our columnists, contributors and visionaries.
No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.