ETF Update: The Agricultural Opportunity
Source: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/WuQQ/~3/455472253/etf-update-the-agricultural-opportunity.htmlPosted on Sunday, November 16th, 2008 | In Market Commentary
As investors survey the landscape of beaten-down ETF’s, different methods come into play. Some are looking for value. Some seek sectors with rebound potential. Others look for news-driven potential.
When we examine ETF charts and our model output, we see the results of this analysis. We see factors like Trends and Cycles and try to Anticipate the best opportunities. It is an interpretation of how the market is reacting to fundamental considerations. Each week we choose a sector for a more detailed focus. (For new readers, there is a more complete description of our methods at the end of the article.)
Spotlight on Agriculture
We follow the Ag sector via the Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The security is based upon the DAXglobal® Agribusiness Index. MOO is down about 36% YTD. The current P/E ratio is about 17 with a price-to-book ratio of about 2. The top five holdings constitute over 40% of the fund. It is a mixture of agriculture and fertilizer companies with about 40% in chemicals, 30% in operations, and 20% in chemicals. About half of the group is US based.
Tom Lydon picked up this connection right after the election. Citing Aaron Task who interviewed James Altucher, Lydon points out the Obama support for ethanol and infrastructure spending.
Jordan Kahn, a colleague at TheStreet.com’s Real Money site, noted the post-election bounce in MOO, and is adding to positions.
We expect to see other analysts picking up this theme.
Rising in the Ratings
We note with interest the rapid rise in our ratings of the Market Vectors Gold Index, GDX. This sector moved from #53 to #7 in the rankings.
Weekly TCA-ETF Rankings
Performance in the S&P 500 last week was very poor, down over 6%. Our portfolio was a little worse, more in line with the Q’s, down almost 8%.
It remains a time of great opportunity, but the market activity also shows great risk. We missed much of the downside by getting out of the market in September, and we are sticking with our signal to act in sectors where prices are much lower.
We are looking for a better way to tabulate and report results. This includes an updated report on the weekly trading program focusing on the top six ETF’s in our rankings. Accredited investors are eligible for our daily trading model, which also includes some discretionary choices. We are reporting the exact days of trading signals in our weekly updates. Those interested can see how this would have played out in a weekly trading program covering the entire period where we have revealed the ratings, as well as earlier extensive testing.
Based upon the current ratings, we have continued our recent bullish vote in the Ticker Sense Blogger Sentiment poll. Last week was the first time that we have had a bullish stance since August 18th.
We are very happy with the model signals, and especially the long period of safety during a slow-moving market crash. For readers interested in our program, we have a long-only method and one that embraces more market timing. Current reports are available to any interested reader — both the TCA-ETF method and the Gong Model. Just use the “email me” link at the top left of the page.
Note for New Readers
Our weekly ETF Update is designed to assist both investors and traders interested in ETF’s and Sector Rotation. Before turning to the current rankings, let us undertake a review for readers new to this series.
Our Method. In this past article, we described our basic methodology and why we believe the rankings are useful for fundamental traders and technical traders alike. While we urge readers to check out the entire article, the key point is that ETF’s pose challenges and opportunities different from investment in individual stocks. The fundamentals may be more difficult to assess. Even with a good grasp on fundamental trends, there is a lot of technically-based trading in ETF’s. This means that those trading with a fundamental approach (and we do this as well) want to monitor the “hot money” moves. Here is an article on that point.
The system synopsis. We look at Trending sectors, Cyclical Sectors, and build in an element of Anticipation for both entry and exit — thus the name of the model, TCA-ETF. While we do not reveal the exact methodology for spotting trends and cycles, the system is not a “black box.” The basic elements are used by many, and widely reported. We even discuss the need for human analysis as opposed to black box trading.
We report the rankings each week, now on the weekend with a one-day delay, using the Thursday output from the model. We monitor and trade this daily, and offer a free report (request via the email address on the top left of the site) for those interested in our weekly trading program.
Last 5 posts by Jeffrey Miller
- A Tough Nut to Crack - October 29th, 2009
- ETF Update: Looking to the Internet - October 25th, 2009
- Healthcare Reform Becoming Less Likely - October 21st, 2009
- ETF Update: Another Look at the Banks - October 18th, 2009
- Identifying Quackery (and Other Mistakes) - October 6th, 2009
Chemicals, Citing Aaron Task;, James Altucher, Jordan Kahn;, Market Commentary, Sp 500, Tom Lydon, United States
![]() About Jeffrey Miller (http://www.oldprof.typepad.com)
Jeffrey A. Miller, Ph.D. is a former college professor with a hands-on, real world attitude. His quantitative modeling helped inform state and local officials in Wisconsin for more than a decade. A Public Policy analyst, he taught advanced research methods at the University of Wisconsin, and analyzed many issues related to state tax policy. In 1987 Jeff began work for market makers at the Chicago Board Options Exchange. His approach included finding anomalies in the standard option pricing models and developing new forecasting techniques. Merging these quantitative techniques with specific company analysis, Jeff also generated trading ideas from sell-side analyst reports. Through his years of experience in trading options, futures and equities, Jeff has come to be regarded as an expert in interpreting the effect of news on the markets and individual stocks. Jeff has served as a forensic expert in several cases involving such issues. He has also written a series of papers on investment management, describing both quantitative methods and those related to behavioral economics. |



