Get Articles Daily from StraightStocks - Enter Email Address


  • National Debt Clock


Country Fund Portfolio Attributes Comparison

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/qvmgroup/yrMF/~3/ntxLftb-ry8/4791
Posted on Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 | In Market Commentary
Contributed by: Richard Shaw (http://www.QVMgroup.com) -

Looking at country and region funds in terms of fundamental portfolio attributes, there are significant valuation differences which should be appreciated when making selections.

This chart presents key data from Morningstar for 45 country and region funds, and color codes the data in comparison to the total US stock market as represented by VTI.

Attributes of funds that are more favorable than the same attribute for the total US market are shaded green.  Those less favorable are shaded pink, and those with an equal attribute value are shaded blue.

With respect to number of holdings and concentration of holdings, we acknowledge that there is opportunity to outperform a benchmark through a less diversified portfolio, however, for the purposes of this article greater diversification is deemed more favorable.  Readers seeking concentration would just need to reverse the color meaning for those two dimensions to get the information they want.

The full size file is large (1221 pix by 796 pix).

click image to enlarge

countryfundcomparisons

Some observations:

The funds in the list all have a higher expense ratios and fewer holdings than VTI (total US).  Some have much higher expenses and many fewer holdings.  It is important to understand that when you buy an index of a few dozen companies, you have more risk of a particular company driving results than if the portfolio has a few hundred (or even a few thousand) company holdings. Examples: FXI (China) and TRF (Russia and Eastern Europe) have only 27 holdings.

Similarly, funds with many holdings but large concentrations in a few holdings are driven more by single issue performance than funds without large concentrations. Examples: TKF (Turkey) has 83.89% of assets in the top ten holdings, and EWL (Switzerland) has 75.19% in the top ten holdings.

Most of the funds have higher 3-year total returns than the US, but also have higher 3-year standard deviation of return (volatility and range of returns).  Examples: US had a -7.4% return with 19.5% standard deviation, whereas FXI (China) and EWZ (Brazil) have approximately 19% returns and approximately 40% standard deviations.

Emerging markets of all sorts have dramatically outperformed the total US stock market year-to-date, as have some developed markets, such as EWA (Australia), EWO (Austria), EWK (Belgium), EWH (Hong Kong), EWS (Singapore), and EWD (Sweden).

On a trailing yield basis, there are greater opportunities than the total US market, but when year-to-date return is considered the list is shortened to these that have a higher trailing yield and a higher YTD return: VWO (emerging markets), EWZ (Brazil) EWM (Malaysia), EWW (Mexico), TRAMX (Middle-East & Africa — mostly GCC), EZA (South Africa), EWT (Taiwan), THD and TTF (Thailand), EWA (Australia), EWO (Austria), EWK (Belgium), EWH (Hong Kong), EWS (Singapore), EWD (Sweden) and EWU (United Kingdom).

If you want better 3-year returns as well, these countries drop off the list: EWO (Austria), EWK (Belgium) and EWU (United Kingdom).

If you seek lower volatility as well as higher yield and YTD return, the list goes to none — with opportunity comes risk.

Funds with substantially more favorable price-to-sales and price-to-cash flow ratios with at least moderately more favorable forward P/E estimates are: ISL (Israel), TRF (Russia & Eastern Europe) and TUR (Turkey). Toss in geopolitical risk issues and the list goes to none.

Staying on top of portfolio attributes such as these may be helpful to you as part (but not all) of the information you consider about choices for your portfolio.

Note also that data sources often provide different information about the same thing — sometimes errors, sometimes differences in data definition.  Checking more than one source and getting as close to primary sources as possible is important as you narrow your choices approaching a risk commitment decision.

Richard Shaw
QVM Group LLC

Last 5 posts by Richard Shaw





About Richard Shaw (http://www.QVMgroup.com)
Richard is a principal of QVM Group LLC, a fee-based investment advisor based in Connecticut with clients across the country. He provides investment coaching to "do-it-yourself" investors, and manages portfolios for those who prefer not to make their own decisions.

His investment approach is based on value, asset allocation, benchmarking, expense control, risk management, customizing portfolios to each client's specific circumstances, and regular communication about strategy and performance.

The QVM Group team also provides municipal refinance services, strategic business planning and financial analysis service for new ventures, private acquisition analysis, and custom investment research.

Richard's extensive experience, includes serving on the Board of Directors of Aberdeen Asset Management PLC (London Stock Exchange: ADN), membership on the Board of Directors of Phoenix Investment Counsel (renamed Virtus Investment Advisors), a U.S. pension manager and investment advisor to the Phoenix Funds (renamed Virtus Funds), as well as serving as Managing Director of a series of offshore investment funds based in Luxembourg. He has led institutional asset management sales and had overall responsibility for management of a U.S. mutual funds broker-dealer.

He was a charter investor and member of the Board of Directors of several internet companies, including Lending Tree prior to its IPO. He is a graduate of Dartmouth College.

QVM Group LLC is a Registered Investment Advisor.

Visit the QVM Group website http://www.qvmgroup.com/QVMinvest/

Leave a Reply

Name

Email (kept private)

Website









No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.