Get Articles Daily from StraightStocks - Enter Email Address


  • National Debt Clock


The Convict who Frightens the Kremlin

Source: http://www.robertamsterdam.com/2009/10/the_convict_who_frightens_the_kremlin.htm
Posted on Friday, October 23rd, 2009 | In Investing Lessons, Russia
Contributed by: Robert Amsterdam (http://www.robertamsterdam.com/) -

mbk102509.jpg

The following is a translation of an article about the second trial of Mikhail Khodorkovsky published in the French weekly magazine, Le Nouvel Observateur.

The Convict who Frightens the Kremlin
From our special correspondent in Moscow

Mikhail Khodorkovsky, former head of oil company Yukos, is serving eight years in prison in Siberia. He is again judged in a trial in which the arbitrary rivals absurdity. The Russian power in the hands of Putin, does not want to see out of prison the person who was formerly the richest man in the country…

It is in this tiny and outdated courtroom No. 7 on the second floor
of the Khamovnitchesky District Court of Moscow that is partly shaped
the future of the new Russia. The traditional cage bars for the
defendants has been replaced by a bullet-proof glass cell. “Officially,
it is a protection. In fact, the bars gave a disastrous image of the
country”, said Vera Tchelicheva, from the opposition newspaper “Novaya
Gazeta”, which has a very low circulation, the only one to continuously
monitor the hearings. The general public will know nothing of the
theater of the absurd that is played here, of what proves to be the
test case for the Russian government.

Rising to power in 1999, the former KGB lieutenant-colonel Vladimir
Putin had agreed to impose the “dictatorship of law”. Recognizing, nine
years later, the lack of judicial independence, his successor in the
Kremlin in 2008, the jurist Dmitry Medvedev has himself promised to end
“legal nihilism” and introduce the “rule of law,” in other words, to
transform Russia into a state where the law rules. But Vladimir Putin,
now Prime minister, has remained the “national leader”. While the press
and foreign ministries, weighing up the power of both, would like to
see in Medvedev a “new Russian Gorbachev” and are lost in conjectures
and expectations about the liberalization of a regime that has
particularly been hard under Putin, in the small room No. 7 of the
court, the matter appears settled.

A rigged trial

In the glass cage called “the aquarium”, two large fish: pale with
white, short shaven hair, thin glasses, wearing a sweatshirt, a black
jacket and jeans, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, 46 with his associate, Platon
Lebedev, 53. Without fear of ridicule, Russian “justice” seeks to drown
the two men in months and months of hearings, under hundreds of
witnesses, 188 volumes, nearly 10.000 pages of charges and hundreds of
kilos of documents, including personal letters , photo albums, and
laundry bills.

Before becoming the most famous political prisoner in
Russia, Khodorkovsky was the richest man in the country. Taking
advantage of the great buy-outs market in the 1990s, questionable
privatizations and the legal void, he had founded, from scratch, the
oil company Yukos.

Trained in Western management skills, a zealous
worker, knowing first to listen and then decide, Khodorkovsky, coming
from a modest family of chemists and the Young Communists, had
succeeded, often swimming in troubled waters, to make it the leading
company in the country, the best managed, the cleanest and the most
transparent one. Today, in front of him is Valery Lakhtine, chief
prosecutor. Stooped, with angular features and a haggard face, wearing
a luxury watch worth several months of his salary, he regularly makes
mistakes in the references and is lost under tons of papers.

The
audience, about fifty people at most, laughs. Indeed, the prosecutor,
assisted by four deputies, has put a laptop in front of him. But the
screen is blank. In two days of hearing, he will laboriously type a
sentence and a half with one finger. In front of them, stands the army
of lawyers of the defendants, also equipped with laptops but showing
formidable efficiency. All the documents have been scanned. As soon as
they are mentioned, they appear on the screen.

It is a gigantic battle
between the old and formidable Russian bureaucracy and the latest
Western technology. But a rigged battle. For whatever happens in this
room, Khodorkovsky will wiithout doubt be found guilty. First sentenced
in 2003 to eight years in prison for tax fraud, he saw his company
dismantled, officially in favor of the state and the “people” but in
fact to the benefit of people close to Putin.

His parole release was
denied, a (false) witness accused Khordorkovsky of returning from a
walk without holding his hands behind his back. He is regularly
punished and thrown into a dungeon. For keeping two “unauthorized”
lemons, drinking tea “out of time limits”, giving an interview in
writing, missing a sewing class, etc. Khodorkovsky must be kept in
prison. He is a dangerous man, “under video-surveillance twenty-four
seven, even in the toilets”, says his mother, Marina Filippovna, 73. He
served his first sentence more than 6000 kilometers away from Moscow
and his family, in Siberia. 40 Celsius degrees in the summer, – 40
Celsius degrees in the winter. Officially, because of a “lack of space,
in any closer location”.

Before Khodorkovsky’s entry into the glass box, a dog sniffs the
room. Then, under the applause of supporters’ applause and their waving
flowers, the two defendants arrive, handcuffed, escorted by police
officers from the special forces, heavily armed, who are making efforts
to appear watching but yawn at the hearing. The area is under high
surveillance. The matter is serious. Khodorkosvky and his partner might
spend twenty years in prison. This time, they are accused of stealing,
physically, at least 250 million tons of oil.

The problem is: the
volume of oil which is supposed to have been stolen exceeds the total
production of Yukos. “The amount would be enough to fill a train that
could go three times around the equator,” said Khodorkovsky, amused, at
the opening of his second trial in March. Another inconsistency: Yukos
has paid 40 billion dollars in taxes on the alleged stolen oil. The
company was the largest contributor to the Russian budget. Considering
the accusations as “schizophrenic”, the defence requested a psychiatric
examination of prosecutor. The prosecutor had to admit some
“inaccuracies”, “technical errors”. The trial continues.

That day, at the outset of the hearing, Mikhail Khodorkovsky repeats in
a soft but firm voice and his constant demand: let the documents
showing that his company delivered Transneft the allegedly “stolen” oil
be added to the file. Besides, how could it be otherwise? Transneft has
a monopoly for the pipelines and oil transportation on the Russian
territory. A request once more denied by Judge Viktor Danilkine, who
has consistently rejected the defence motions. Khodorkovsky will
therefore not be able to prove his innocence. Without doubt one of the
most brilliant, the most Westernized and least flashy member of the new
Russian elite, Khodorkovsky is an audacious man. Did not he have crazy
projects in Putin’s Russia: bringing American companies in his capital,
fostering relations with the West through his foundation “Open Russia”,
daring to defy the head of the Kremlin to take real steps against
corruption that more than ever is a gangrene up to the summit of power?
Did not he also sponsor the Democratic and liberal opposition to
counterbalance the hegemonic ruling party “United Russia”? With his
efficiency, organizational skills, determination, might he not become
tomorrow’s leader that the opposition is desperately seeking?

But in relentlessly pursuing him, the State has made him a martyr, one
of those characters from Dostoevsky novels which the Russians like,
although they had rather appreciated the first trial against the
oligarch, this “nouveau riche”- and even worse, in a country where
anti-Semitism is still alive, who had Jewish origins. And even if it is
clear that Khodorkovsky is not a saint, everyone knows he is not tried
for misconduct alleged against him. Otherwise, all the new Russian
elite who would be in prison today.

Judicial Farce

Second day of hearing. Big surprise. Attorney Latkhine triumphantly
waves a pack of new documents. The defence requests to examine them.
Recess. It turns out that these new pieces of “evidence” of guilt,
obtained outside any procedure, were requested the day before by the
defence but refused by the court. Bursts of laughter in the room.
Confusion of the prosecutor. Another interruption. A bit embarrassed,
the judge accepts the documents. Then comes the time Valeri Latkhine
waited for, he who probably dreams of being decorated by Putin himself,
just like the prosecutor of the first trial. Andrei Kraïnov, one of
innumerable prosecution witnesses, presents himself to the bar. He got
only a five year suspended sentence in the first trial. He had
cooperated with the prosecution. Embarrassed to be there, he lowers his
head, speaks in a voice barely audible, almost invariably responds to
questions during a day and a half: ‘ia nia znaïou’, ‘ia nia pomniou, “I
do not know”, “I do not remember”.

“Do you know who gave the order to
transform the legal structure of Yukos-Moscow? – No, I do not know”,
replies the witness. Attorney Latkhine sits down with a knowing look.
Nobody understands what he has in mind. Not even Judge Viktor
Danilkine, embarrassed by this show as boring as it is deplorable, who
eventually loses his temper: “But what are you talking about?” he
abruptly asks the prosecutor.

“I do not know if the accusation knows itself where it is going”, says
Vladimir Krasnov, a defence counsel. Like a beaten dog, Attorney
Lakhtine resumes the interrogation. “Now, you’re giving answers to the
witness!” cries the irritated the judge who has more than he can take
by this trial that is turning into a judicial farce, and which seems
like it came right out of a Kafka novel. In the aquarium, Khodorkovsky
does not lift an eye. He methodically examines the record of the
accusation. The cros-examination turns into a disaster for the
prosecutor. The witness has to even admit that he lied at the first
trial, and that he does not know the procedures for delivery of oil
from Yukos to Transneft.

Almost systematically, the prosecutor’s witnesses become those of the
defence: they must agree that it is physically impossible to steal 250
million tons of oil. At the end, Khodorkovsky speaks. In a clear and
firm voice, he is going to take apart, in three turns and a few
minutes, two days of hearings. He addresses the judge: “First, you
allowed the prosecutor to question a witness him specifying the
charges. Second, you allowed the prosecutor to act outside of this
trial by questioning a man that everybody understood that he knew
nothing: nothing about the oil delivery sites from Yukos to Transneft,
nothing about the people in charge. Thirdly, you refused to let me
speak during the study of the evidence. The result of all this? An
absurd scene that is wasting the court’s time. If you had let me speak,
if you wanted to know who gave the order to transform the status of
Yukos-Moscow, I would have told you.
That’s me. I would have said when, how and why. Vsyo!” “That’s all!”

The audience is delighted. Judge Danilkine wipes his glasses. Attorney
Lakhtin picks up piles of files. Without a shadow of visible emotion,
Khodorkovsky sits down, slowly drinking a glass of water. Truly a
dangerous man. -Jean-Baptiste Naudet

Last 5 posts by Robert Amsterdam





About Robert Amsterdam (http://www.robertamsterdam.com/)
Robert Amsterdam is a lawyer and an advocate for rule of law. His blog was created to express views which may stimulate debate and discussion on topics of international interest. Robert believes that we live in a world of unchallenged impunity, and he views his blog as merely a small attempt to shine a light on issues he views as important in countries with which he is engaged. He make no apologies or pretense of objectivity - he is merely stating his opinions.

Leave a Reply

Name

Email (kept private)

Website









No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.