Get Articles Daily from StraightStocks - Enter Email Address


  • National Debt Clock


Selling into Strength or Weakness

Posted on Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007 | In Investing Lessons
Contributed by: Roger Nusbaum (http://randomroger.blogspot.com) -

A reader commented on yesterday’s post, paraphrasing David Swensen, that “selling into weakness (ie panicking) is the biggest sin.” I can’t vouch for Swensen’s belief but assuming the reader is correct…

What about selling your losers and letting your winners run? Did William O’Neill come up with the 8% stop order? I’m thinking he had something sound in mind. Isn’t every stop that has ever been executed been a sale on weakness?

On the other hand “no one ever went broke taking profits.” We should buy when there is blood in the streets, we should buy when stocks are on sale.

Either camp (sell strength or sell weakness) can cherry pick thousands of examples to make their case but there is no way to know which is right except in hindsight. If a stock goes from $30 to $20 in a panic what it does next would just be a guess. If it goes to $10 then selling at $20 was the correct trade and if it goes right back to $30 a $20 sale was the wrong trade. Both examples exist.

Some people seem to be militantly devoted to one or the other and I have never understood this. The people who use 8% stops on everything got whipsawed hard this summer.

Can anyone say that the person who “panicked” out of the market during the first week of 2001 at the low of 1274 (this can been seen better by clicking on the chart) made a bad decision? Sure they would have done better to sell a week later but that misses the forest for the trees.

Either method can be articulately defended and either one can be easily refuted with plenty of examples.

I have sold into both weakness and strength and have been right with both methods and wrong with both. Going forward I will sell with both methods and again will be both right and wrong with each one. If you choose just one method you will get some right and some wrong, ditto if you go with both.

So is there a right answer? I don’t think so. I have written many times about not being married to either side and that works for me. You obviously have to do what works for you, more specifically what lets you sleep at night.

Last 5 posts by Roger Nusbaum

Tags for this Post:
Investing Lessons




About Roger Nusbaum (http://randomroger.blogspot.com)
Roger Nusbaum is a portfolio manager with Your Source Financial of Phoenix, and the author of Random Roger's Big Picture Blog, which has been profiled in several top business publications, including Barron's and Forbes. Nusbaum has also been a financial consultant with Morgan Stanley, an investment counselor with Fisher Investments and an institutional equities and options trader with Charles Schwab. He holds a bachelor's degree in economics from San Diego State University

Leave a Reply

Name

Email (kept private)

Website









No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.