Get Articles Daily from StraightStocks - Enter Email Address


  • National Debt Clock


More About Reits

Posted on Wednesday, December 12th, 2007 | In Investing Lessons
Contributed by: Roger Nusbaum (http://randomroger.blogspot.com) -

A reader asks;

I am curious about your take on REIT etfs at this stage. It seems to me that as a group they have been overly beat down because of the sub-prime mess and perhaps the coming of the long awaited slow down in the economy. It avoid single stock risk, i have been thinking of putting a toe into this catagory of stocks. Any thoughts? Any best of breed insights?

A lot of people love REITs. You can find recommendations out there suggesting as much as 15 or 20% in REITs. If you do a search for lazy portfolios you will see various suggested weightings there as well.

REITs are an asset class, like most asset classes there are periods where they do very well. I think there is an element of REITs being too adored, people owning too much and the declines being very big when they happen.

The one REIT I own across the board has been hot very hard but not noticeably harder than other REITs. I have 2-3% allocation depending on the client which I consider an underweight.

One of the benefits of REITs is the low correlation to equities. iShares has two domestic REIT ETFs with long track record; IYR and ICF. According to PortfolioScience.com IYR has 0.758 correlation to the S&P 500 and ICF has 0.701 correlation. That isn’t that low. There is a closed end fund that invests in Asian real estate with ticker RAP that has a 0.486 correlation which is a little more like it. The one REIT I own has a 0.658 correlation, remember an ETF is likely to have a higher correlation than an individual name.

I am considering taking a tax loss on the one REIT I have and swapping it for something foreign, but not RAP. The logic behind possibly going foreign is the desire for a lower correlation.

The question seems to have a short term element to it. I don’t doubt that the decline in REITs is more than what us justified but to the extent they are guilty by association more decline would not be shocking. I said before I am not in a hurry to add financial exposure until the yield curve normalizes and it seems that the abnormal curve may have played a role in the REIT decline too.

Well there certainly appears to be a tight correlation there.

iyr.gifOn something like this I think I would need to have a fundamental justification for increasing exposure. Changing it, as I plan to do, is a different matter. It is an asset class and I believe some exposure is warranted in the interest of maintaining a diversified portfolio.

Last 5 posts by Roger Nusbaum

Tags for this Post:
Investing Lessons




About Roger Nusbaum (http://randomroger.blogspot.com)
Roger Nusbaum is a portfolio manager with Your Source Financial of Phoenix, and the author of Random Roger's Big Picture Blog, which has been profiled in several top business publications, including Barron's and Forbes. Nusbaum has also been a financial consultant with Morgan Stanley, an investment counselor with Fisher Investments and an institutional equities and options trader with Charles Schwab. He holds a bachelor's degree in economics from San Diego State University

Leave a Reply

Name

Email (kept private)

Website









No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.