When Markets Stabilize Russia Is a Better Bet Than US
Posted on Sunday, September 21st, 2008 | In RussiaThe news that Washington is fast becoming the world’s biggest slumlord through the buyout of distressed mortgages helped send international markets skyward.
The biggest gains were in Russian stocks. And this could be the situation for quite some time, says emerging markets expert Irwin Greenstein, writing for Contrarian Profits.
The irony, of course, is that Washington and Moscow are now marching in lockstep with each other when it comes to their stance on market intervention. After a series of unprecedented bailouts, the US has effectively renounced the principle that markets are self-regulating.
This from Irwin…
Russia’s RTSI Index (RUS:RTS.RS) jumped 20.17%. That’s huge, especially in comparison China’s SSE Composite Index (Shanghai: 000001.SS), which gained 9.46% and the Hang Seng Index (HKSE:^HSI), which closed up yesterday 9.61%.
Meanwhile, the Dow closed yesterday with a gain of 3.9%.
That Moscow and Washington have both used massive bailouts to rescue domestic (and international) markets shows how close the former enemies have come in terms of their so-called capitalistic philosophies.
Like the US, Russia’s stock markets fell into disarray on fears of an economic slowdown. Depending on which news outlet you read and believe any number of reasons were dished about the Russian markets: that Moscow can’t manage markets; that the US played economic warfare and punished Moscow for the Georgia incursion; or that the international business community got completely freaked out by Putin’s nationalization movement and bailed.
Although Moscow and Washington weren’t the only central banks to pump cash into global markets, there is a sense of irony that these two in particular are operating in lockstep when it comes to rescue strategies.
Investors in the RTSI Index clearly came out on top with this huge gain (whether or not it’s sustainable remains to be seen). But profits aside, Moscow scored an even bigger win as the US pretty much renounced the notion that free markets are self-regulating – something that Russia and China have known for a while.
With Washington’s tacit admission that it really did lose the Cold War to Russia any forthcoming clashes will end up becoming mere theater.
It seems almost impossible to believe that future run-ins can have anything to do with contrasting political philosophies. Instead, we may be entering a new type of Cold War that’s all about natural resources – and consequently money.
If you believe that line of thinking, the long term bet would be on the RTSI Index. It’s almost comical to think that either of the presidential candidates and the current administration can stand up to Iron Man Putin (although it would be interesting to see what Sarah Palin can do).
Sooner rather than later the markets will once again stabilize. You should consider going long with the genuine article, the RTSI Index, versus the imitation capitalist index, the Dow.
Irwin Greenstein is a contributor to Contrarian Profits. He writes about finance and the shotgun sports from Maryland. Prior, he specialized in worldwide marketing and media outreach for small high-tech companies. Irwin was formerly a contributing author to the Emerging Markets blog, from the Taipan Publishing Group.
Last 5 posts by Contrarian Profits
- Transportation Sector: powered by recovery - November 23rd, 2009
- The Dollar, the Euro, and being Bullish on Gold - November 20th, 2009
- Audit the Fed – Amendment to a $200 billion bill frightens currency traders! - November 20th, 2009
- What if They Stop Buying our Debt? - November 19th, 2009
- Goldbugs Beware! The tax man cometh! - November 18th, 2009
BRIC Nations, China, Dow 30, Emerging Markets, finance, Georgia, Hang Seng 40, high-tech, investing in russia, Irwin Greenstein, Maryland, Moscow, RTSI, Russia, Russia, Sarah Palin, shanghai, shotgun sports, Taipan Publishing Group, United States, Washington



ContrarianProfits.com is a financial news and opinion website with a twist. As investment guru Rick Rule puts it, “You are either a contrarian or a victim.” In the financial world, most people are losers because they just don’t know what game they’re playing. They think they can just get “into the market” along with everyone else, do what everyone else does, and they will make money. Not likely. By the time you’ve paid commissions, spreads, fees, taxes – and suffered the consequences of inflation – you’ll be very lucky just to have as much money as you started with.
ContrarianProfits.com is a contrarian site, in the sense that we provide ideas, opinions and recommendations that often run counter to the mainstream financial press. We do this not just to be contrary, but because we’ve realized that Rick is right. You don’t make money by following the crowd; you make money by leading it.
Why is this so? Well, it’s obvious that if you do the same thing everyone else does you’ll get the same results everyone else gets. On average, and over the long run, real investment returns for the typical investor cannot exceed the rate of growth of the economy itself. Everybody can’t get richer faster than everybody else. Real economic growth in the US today averages about 3% per year; if you don’t make any mistakes, that’s about what you can expect. Few people may be satisfied with 3% per year, but most feel comfortable in the middle of the financial herd and are happy to take whatever that gets them. If you’re one of those people, you will probably not like our site. It will make you uncomfortable.
If, on the other hand, you’re willing to look at things a little differently, you’ll appreciate the views of many of our columnists, contributors and visionaries.