Rice vs. Gates on the NATO Response to Russia
Source: http://www.robertamsterdam.com/2008/09/rice_vs_gates_on_the_nato_resp.htmPosted on Monday, September 22nd, 2008 | In Russia
The Boston Globe appears to believe that the hard line being pushed by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Russia is inappropriate and unnecessary, especially when compared to the realist assessment of Minister of Defense Robert Gates, who apparently believes that Russia poses no military threat…
Defense Secretary Robert Gates offered a more dispassionate view the same day, noting that there is no real military threat from Russia. NATO countries should seek a prudent “middle ground” in responding to the war in Georgia, Gates said, and they should avoid sending provocative signals to Moscow. Rice may be the Russia expert, but American policy would be better shaped by Gates’s unflustered view of Russia.
I’m not sure what’s more strange about this op/ed: the portrayal of Gates as the dovish peacenik despite his clear awareness of Russia’s energy assault on Europe, or the assumption that treating Russia as exceptional case and responding softly would actually produce the future policy outcomes the West is looking for. Having internal competition between the State and Defense Departments over Russia policy is an ideal goal for the Kremlin to pursue.
Last 5 posts by Robert Amsterdam
- Energy Blast - Nov 26, 2009 - November 26th, 2009
- Today in Russian Business - Nov 26, 2009 - November 26th, 2009
- RA's Daily Russian News Blast - Nov 26, 2009 - November 26th, 2009
- How to Earn Putin Points and Survive in Russian Business - November 25th, 2009
- Putin's Eye of the Tiger - November 25th, 2009
Condoleezza Rice, energy assault, Europe, Georgia, Moscow, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Robert Gates, Russia, Russia, the Boston Globe
 About Robert Amsterdam (http://www.robertamsterdam.com/)
Robert Amsterdam is a lawyer and an advocate for rule of law. His blog was created to express views which may stimulate debate and discussion on topics of international interest. Robert believes that we live in a world of unchallenged impunity, and he views his blog as merely a small attempt to shine a light on issues he views as important in countries with which he is engaged. He make no apologies or pretense of objectivity - he is merely stating his opinions. |
No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.