XLF—Next Stop $10?
Source: http://www.indexuniverse.com/blog/4621-xlf-next-stop-10-.html?Itemid=3&utm_source=straightstocks.com&utm_medium=sidebar&utm_campaign=rssPosted on Wednesday, October 8th, 2008 | In Exchange Traded Funds
Short sales are (maybe) back to the market tomorrow. Has doomsday arrived? A look at the market through ETFs.
First, conventional wisdom is that despite the meltdown (and yes, Matt I will stand up here and call it that with pride, because if THIS isn’t a market meltdown, what would be?). I’ve seen markets plunge before and I’ve felt this same raw fear, but I think I’ve never quite felt this complete capital-freeze feeling that is in the air. I mean, where did all the money go?
First, on the short sales thing, I think I’ll put my odds with Matt that the Financials short sales ban will not be allowed to expire, though conventional wisdom is that allowing it to do so would not cause a meltdown of markets as you now actually have to have a locate on a borrowed share to sell it short. That will slow up the shorting activity a bit and make buying of more shares necessary to the process.
And now onto MELTDOWN 2008 (roll the dramatic CNN music).
Just to satisfy my own curiosity, I thought I’d take a gauge of just how bad it is out there, by selectively looking at the YTD returns of a number of the biggest ETFs. I’ll put in the fund names for those of you who aren’t big enough ETF geeks to have all the tickers memorized. I’ve used Morningstar data, which for ETFs now shows market total return percentage (which is based on actual market trading price returns) and NAV total return percentage (which is based on the returns of the actual underlying holding). And let me confuse you some more: This is NOT about tracking error. That would be to the actual underlying INDEX. This is about premium or discount of the ETF shares to their actual underlying holdings.
By the way, we’re radically expanding our own data and within the next month, will make the ETF and index fund database even better in terms of scope and utility.
Anyway, the returns picture is NOT pretty:
Year-To-Date 2008 Total Returns
|
Ticker |
Market Total Return % |
NAV Total Return % |
ETF Name |
|
VTI |
-30.21 |
-26.30 |
Vanguard Total U.S. Stock Market |
|
SPY |
-30.90 |
-31.40 |
SPDRs S&P 500 |
|
QQQQ |
-36.11 |
-36.05 |
NASDAQ 100 Trust |
|
DIA |
-27.16 |
-27.60 |
Dow Jones Industrial Average DIAMONDS Trust |
|
IWM |
-25.93 |
-26.22 |
iShares Russell 2000 |
|
EFA |
-37.86 |
-35.05 |
iShares MSCI EAFE Europe/Asia |
|
EEM |
-42.64 |
-45.00 |
MSCI Emerging Markets |
|
GLD |
5.83 |
4.48 |
SSgA Gold Shares Trust |
|
XLF |
-36.82 |
-36.12 |
Select Sector SPDRS Financials |
|
XLE |
-34.04 |
-33.86 |
Select Sector SPDRs Energy |
|
AGG |
-1.13 |
1.62 |
iShares Lehman Aggregate total bond fund |
|
DBC |
-6.21 |
-5.37 |
Deutsche Bank Commodities Index ETF |
Source: Morningstar. Data as of 10/7/2008 market close
Some of those numbers are clearly off a bit and look a bit like 10/7 market numbers and 10/6 NAVs (VTI in particular stands out). But you get the point—the market is TANKING. Big-time.
Ending on DBC, I thought it would be interesting to look at the ETNs, because the iShares GSCI is the only ETF which is directly comparable to an ETN tracking the same index. And I’ve thrown in the biggest commodities fund, the iPath DJ-AIG just for fun. Interesting numbers.
|
Ticker |
Mkt% |
NAV% |
ETF/ETN Name |
|
GSG |
-12.08 |
-9.92 |
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity ETF |
|
GSP |
-11.32 |
-10.87 |
iPath S&P GSCI Commodity ETN |
|
DJP |
-17.34 |
-17.41 |
iPath DJ AIG Commodity ETN |
So I guess that what this is saying is that iShares ETF NAV is beating the index NAV return (which is presumably represented by the iPath NAV %) by almost 100 basis points. And it sure needs it, as the market % is underperforming the NAV% by over 200 basis points. But look at that spread of returns across the commodities sector. From -6.21 to -17.34. And these are supposedly comparable broad baskets of commodities. I dare you to make try to make sense of the range of indexes and product structure in that space. A dissertation could be written on that subject alone.
This is just a blog—I welcome anyone’s thoughts on this in the comments after the article or in an email to me if you’d like. jwiandt@indexuniverse.com
Volatility Up, WAY Up
A couple of interesting things from yesterday’s continuation of the Stock Market Horror Show. I’d noted on Tuesday that VIX had cracked 50 for the first time in its 18-year history on Monday. It bettered itself in another wild day yesterday. Here’s a snapshot from Matt Moran of the CBOE:
- Today (10/7/2008) the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) closed at 53.68, another record closing price.
- Today’s volume for SPX options—1,225,700 contracts (501,809 calls and 723,891 puts).
- Today’s volume for SPX options—134,852 contracts (69,881 calls and 64,971 puts).
TOP 10 DAILY CLOSING PRICES FOR CBOE VOLATILITY INDEX (VIX)
1 7-Oct-2008 53.68
2 6-Oct-2008 52.05
3 29-Sep-2008 46.72
4 8-Oct-1998 45.74
5 10-Sep-1998 45.29
6 2-Oct-2008 45.26
7 3-Oct-2008 45.14
8 5-Aug-2002 45.08
9 23-Jul-2002 44.92
10 31-Aug-1998 44.28
ONE-YEAR % CHANGES (THROUGH OCT. 6)
207.8% VIX CBOE Volatility Index
119.9% OVX CBOE Crude Oil Volatility Index
111.2% VXV CBOE S&P 500 3-Month Volatility Index
52.3% VWX CBOE Lehman 5-Month VIX Futures Index
-10.4% PUT CBOE S&P 500 PutWrite Index
-12.6% BXD CBOE DJIA BuyWrite Index
-14.7% VPN CBOE Capped VIX Premium Strategy Index
-16.1% BXM CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index
-30.7% SPTR S&P 500 Total Return
-31.1% Russell 3000 Total Return Index
YEAR-TO-DATE % CHANGES (THROUGH OCT. 6)
131.3% VIX CBOE Volatility Index
78.9% OVX CBOE Crude Oil Volatility Index
67.9% VXV CBOE S&P 500 3-Month Volatility Index
21.6% VWX CBOE Lehman 5-Month VIX Futures Index
-12.1% PUT CBOE S&P 500 PutWrite Index
-12.8% BXD CBOE DJIA BuyWrite Index
-13.6% VPN CBOE Capped VIX Premium Strategy Index
-17.1% BXM CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index
-26.8% SPTR S&P 500 Total Return
-27.0% Russell 3000 Total Return Index
The Dow Down, WAY Down
And again, ALWAYS fun to watch when the markets are going insane is the Dow. Thanks to the Dow Jones people for putting together these little summaries:
Dow Jones Industrial Average
As of October 7, 2008:
- The DJIA, down 508.39 points, or -5.11%, to close at 9447.11.
- First time closing below 9500 since October 2, 2003.
- At its intraday high, the DJIA reached 10124.03.
- At its intraday low, the DJIA was down as much as 518.83 points, or 5.2%, to 9436.67.
- Lowest intraday level since October 2, 2003. The last time the DJIA had an intraday low below 9500 was on October 24, 2003.
- Lowest closing value in five years, since September 30, 2003
- Down for the fifth straight trading day and six of the last seven.
- Down 1403.55 points, or 12.9%, over the last five trading days.
- Largest five-day point decline in its history.
- Largest five-day percentage decline since September 21, 2001.
- Largest one-day point and percentage decline since September 29.
- Sixth largest point decline in its history.
- It has dropped 4717.42 points, or -33.30%, from its record close of 14164.53, hit on October 9, 2007.
- It has dropped -27.65% from its 2008 close high of 13058.20, hit on May 2.
- Month-to-date, the DJIA is down -12.94%. In September, it closed down 6.00%.
- Year-to-date, it is down -28.78%.
- Off 33.3% from 52 weeks ago.
Trading Presidents
And to add on a bit of politics again here, yesterday I mentioned Intrade. Well I didn’t talk about how it really works. And the actionable part of the Intrade market involves buying shares in a candidate or proposition. So, for example, predebate, the last price on Obama was 70.1, and the last price on McCain was 27.8. Presumably once someone is declared a winner in the election, their price goes up to 100. So if you bet on McCain right now, you could TRIPLE your money in a couple months if he wins. That seems to me like a pretty good bet to take. Am I missing something? Is McCain THAT much of an underdog? Markets seem to think so. The flip side is HOW people see it … betting on Obama gives you an easy 42.65% return on your money. But if he loses, of course, you have a 100% loss. It’s an interesting study in investing psychology.
Last 5 posts by Jim Wiandt
- FINRA Warns On Leveraged ETFs - June 19th, 2009
- What is Wrong With Matt Hougan? - June 16th, 2009
- ProShares, Direxion Are NOT ETFs - June 16th, 2009
- Shock And Awe - June 12th, 2009
- ETFs Are A Scam? - June 10th, 2009
Cnn, Deutsche Bank, Dow 30, Dow Jones Industrial Average DIAMONDS Trust, ETF, Exchange Traded Funds, Matt Moran, Nasdaq 100, NASDAQ 100 Trust, Nav, Russell 2000, Russell 3000, Sp 500, SSgA Gold Shares Trust, United States, USD, VPN, www.indexuniverse.com/data, www.intrade.com
![]() About Jim Wiandt (http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/blog.html)
Jim Wiandt is the editor and publisher of the Journal of Indexes and publisher of IndexUniverse.com and Exchange-Traded Funds Report (ETFR). Wiandt also oversees the Financial Technology and Design Group (FTDG) of Index Publications LLC. Wiandt was formerly publisher of IndexFunds.com, and is the author of Exchange Traded Funds, published by John Wiley & Sons in 2001. He previously worked as a contract journalist in West Africa, after serving in the Peace Corps in Niger. He graduated from Tufts University in 1991. |



