Morningstar: Grading On A Curve
Source: http://www.indexuniverse.com/blog/5829-morningstar-grading-on-a-curve.html?Itemid=3&utm_source=straightstocks.com&utm_medium=sidebar&utm_campaign=rssPosted on Tuesday, May 12th, 2009 | In Exchange Traded Funds, Market Commentary
Morningstar is out with a new report on the global mutual funds industry, and the only country to score an “A” is the U.S. That’s flattering, I suppose. But it can mean only one thing: we’re grading on a curve.
The report—which is a great piece of research, and is available here—examines the mutual fund investor experience in 16 countries. It analyzes that experience on a variety of metrics: Investor Protection; Transparency in Prospectus and Shareholder Reports; Transparency in Sales Practices and Media; Fees and Expenses; Taxation and Distribution/Choice.
The U.S., as mentioned, is the only country to earn an “A.” China gets a “B+” while Italy, Japan, The Netherlands and Taiwan rank “B’s.” The numbers go on from there with New Zealand bringing up the rear, earning a big D-.
I don’t have the global experience to compare the U.S. and New Zealand, but I know one thing: we don’t deserve an “A.”
- How do we deserve an “A” when the majority of mutual funds are sold on commission, putting the interests of financial agents at odds with the interests of investors?
- How do we deserve an “A” if 70-85% of our funds trail the market average, due primarily to high fees?
- How do we deserve an “A” if the average mutual fund turns over its entire portfolio each and every year?
- How do we deserve an “A” when most mutual funds don’t bother to vote their shares in an intelligent fashion?
- How do we deserve an “A” when we have a 401(k) program that disguises its fees and shunts investors into overpriced, under-performing funds?
- How do we deserve an “A” when our shareholder communications (starting with prospectuses) are unintelligible legalese, and 99% of them are thrown away unread?
Savvy investors in the United States can find great mutual fund products: products with low fees, high transparency and dedicated management.
But the majority of Americans are poorly served by mutual funds, which charge high fees for a substandard product and uses tantalizing advertisements to lure investors into chasing returns.
An “A”? Not in my book.
Last 5 posts by Matt Hougan
- Long-Term Treasury Shorts? - July 16th, 2009
- Home Prices In 2014? Dead Flat From Here - June 30th, 2009
- Papering Over The Problem - June 16th, 2009
- What's Wrong With ETFs - June 15th, 2009
- A (Popular) ETF Down 97%??? - June 4th, 2009
China, dedicated management;, Exchange Traded Funds, Index Publications LLC;, Italy, Japan, Market Commentary, mutual fund products;, New Zealand, shareholder communications;, substandard product;, Taiwan, The Netherlands, United States
 About Matt Hougan (http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/blog.html)
Matt Hougan is senior editor of the Journal of Indexes, editor of IndexUniverse.com and a contributing writer for the Exchange-Traded Funds Report and Financial Advisor magazine. Prior to joining JoI, Matt directed the internal communications effort at Genzyme Corporation, and worked as a biotech analyst and journalist for the award-winning financial Web site MetaMarkets.com. Hougan, a 1998 graduate of Bowdoin College, lives on the coast of Maine. |
No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.