Get Articles Daily from StraightStocks - Enter Email Address


  • National Debt Clock


ETF Update: Time for REITS?

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/WuQQ/~3/rzRChuDsnlk/etf-update-time-for-reits.html
Posted on Sunday, April 19th, 2009 | In Market Commentary, Real Estate
Contributed by: Jeffrey Miller (http://www.oldprof.typepad.com) -

Sometimes price action seems inconsistent with the fundamental story.  One of the ways we use our ETF rankings is to highlight developments that deserve further investigation.

While financial sectors in general earn continued strong ratings, the most noteworthy feature of the new ratings is the rapid rise of two Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) ETF’s.  (The complete current rankings are at the end of the article, along with an explanation of our methodology).

Surprising REIT Strength

Investors who choose REIT’s general seek high yield and tax advantages.  The REIT must return 90% of income to unit holders to avoid taxation at the trust level.  Since certain non-cash expenses like depreciation reduce income, investors determine value as a multiple of adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) rather than a PE multiple.  The REIT provides smaller investors the opportunity to add real estate of various types to their portfolios without directly buying properties.  (Those interested in learning more about REIT’s, valuation, and taxation can find a good start on the subject, including many specific articles by experts, at Investopedia.

The most obvious risk in REIT investing comes when there is reduced performance from the properties held in the trust.  The economic impact on commercial real estate has placed REIT shares among the worst performers performers  since last October’s turning point.

More recently, there has been a rebound.  Sameer Bhatia of Dow Jones writes as follows:

REIT shares have rallied between 30% and 60% over the last month despite continued weak retail sales, rising vacancies, structural overcapacity in the sector, staggering debt loads and significant refinancing risk at some of these companies.

Why the current strength?  Is there an opportunity for the ETF investor or trader?

REIT ETF’s

We evalute REIT’s through the iShares Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index Fund (ICF) and the iShares Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index Fund (IYR).  Both are currently in the top eight of our rankings, but we will focus on 2nd-ranked ICF, up from #29 last week.

ICF has reasonable diversity with 25% of the fund in five names and about 40% in the top ten.  Since the trusts are all very similar, this can be deceptive.  The beta for the group is about 1.6.

The chart below clearly shows the collapse last autumn, as well as the recent strength.
Icf
Reasons for the Rebound

The Dow Jones article cited above suggests an interesting reason for REIT strength, the potential for acquisitions.

Leading REITs such as Simon Property Group Inc. (SPG), Public Storage (PSA) and Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) can acquire the senior secured debt, or the mortgage notes securing assets, of their weaker competitors at their current discounted prices and then simply wait for these companies to sink under the weight of their own debt. This could prove a unique win-win strategy for well-capitalized companies looking to acquire others.

If the target company does default, it would give the acquirer a strong negotiating position and make it the leading contender to take possession of the assets of the defaulting company

We note that the leaders named in the article are also the top holdings in ICF.

Mark Jewell of the Associated Press, has a different slant.  His story, Opportunity abounds in battered REIT market, highlights the attractive yields after the collapse in prices.

Some see the REIT rally as just a part of the general market rebound.

Traders Drawing a Line

Two noted trading authorities are skeptical about IYR.

David Fry (not mentioning closely-related ICF) sees “clear resistance” for IYR.  Be sure to check out his charts with notes.

Maoxian sees a return to the March lows as part of a textbook setup with broader market implications.  Check out his chart.

Our Take

This is a very interesting question.  While we trade by following our model, it is wise to be aware of all viewpoints.  It is part of the process of improving methods.

Weekly TCA-ETF Rankings

47 of our 57 sectors are in the “buy” range.  Many sectors still have extremely strong ratings, although some energy and health care ETF’s have moved into our “penalty box”.  This designation means that the sector cannot qualify as  “buy” on technical grounds.  You can think of it like a sell stop, only with a more complicated basis.

It was another excellent week for the system, gaining over 4 percent and beating the S&P by more than 2.5%.

Based upon the model signals, we continue our official bullish position in the Ticker Sense Blogger Sentiment poll.

041609

Note for New Readers

Our weekly ETF Update is designed to assist both investors and traders interested in ETF’s and Sector Rotation.  Before turning to the current rankings, let us undertake a review for readers new to this series.

Our Method. In this past article, we described our basic methodology and why we believe the rankings are useful for fundamental traders and technical traders alike.  While we urge readers to check out the entire article, the key point is that ETF’s pose challenges and opportunities different from investment in individual stocks.  The fundamentals may be more difficult to assess.  Even with a good grasp on fundamental trends, there is a lot of technically-based trading in ETF’s.  This means that those trading with a fundamental approach (and we do this as well) want to monitor the “hot money” moves.  Here is an article on that point.

The system synopsis. We look at Trending sectors, Cyclical Sectors, and build in an element of Anticipation for both entry and exit — thus the name of the model, TCA-ETF.  While we do not reveal the exact methodology for spotting trends and cycles, the system is not a “black box.”  The basic elements are used by many, and widely reported.  We even discuss the need for human analysis as opposed to black box trading.

We report the rankings each week, now on the weekend with a one-day delay, using the Thursday output from the model.  We monitor and trade this daily, and offer a free report (request via the email address on the top left of the site) for those interested in our weekly trading program.

Last 5 posts by Jeffrey Miller





About Jeffrey Miller (http://www.oldprof.typepad.com)
Jeffrey A. Miller, Ph.D. is a former college professor with a hands-on, real world attitude. His quantitative modeling helped inform state and local officials in Wisconsin for more than a decade. A Public Policy analyst, he taught advanced research methods at the University of Wisconsin, and analyzed many issues related to state tax policy.

In 1987 Jeff began work for market makers at the Chicago Board Options Exchange. His approach included finding anomalies in the standard option pricing models and developing new forecasting techniques. Merging these quantitative techniques with specific company analysis, Jeff also generated trading ideas from sell-side analyst reports.

Through his years of experience in trading options, futures and equities, Jeff has come to be regarded as an expert in interpreting the effect of news on the markets and individual stocks. Jeff has served as a forensic expert in several cases involving such issues. He has also written a series of papers on investment management, describing both quantitative methods and those related to behavioral economics.

Leave a Reply

Name

Email (kept private)

Website









No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.