From the The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel’s description of Krugman’s scientific contributions:

Trade and Geography — Economies of Scale,
Differentiated Products and Transport Costs

By the late 1980s, researchers had begun to integrate economies of scale into general
equilibrium models of location and trade, thereby giving precision to the verbal analyses of
earlier researchers and adding important new insights. In the resulting work, now commonly
known as the new economic geography, economic geographers made use of the new tools,
along with economists who took a renewed interest in the field. Several researchers took part
in these developments, but the most influential contributions were made by Paul Krugman.

Krugman has published a large number of important articles and monographs in the fields of
both trade and geography. In particular, he made the initial key contributions. He wrote the
first article in the trade theory, soon followed by another influential paper that extended his
initial analysis (Krugman, 1979a and 1980). Further, Krugman (1991a) is commonly viewed
as the starting point of new economic geography. In fact, the seeds of the new economic
geography can already be found in his 1979 (a) article which, in its final section, argues that
patterns of migration can be analyzed within the same framework as the new trade theory.
While this article had an immediate impact on the trade literature, it would take more than ten
years for the final section, on migration and agglomeration, to have an influence on the
geography literature – kindled by Krugman himself, in the 1991 (a) paper.

As an economist who received his training in the mid-to-late 1980’s, I can attest to the excitement that Krugman’s work engendered in the trade literature. As a newly minted PhD teaching at UC-Santa Cruz, I saw how the undergraduate trade textbooks were transformed from descriptions of Ricardian, specific factor, and factor proportion models, and partial equilibrium analyses of tariffs and quotas, to ones that could also formally address issues of intra-industry trade, and the role of internal and extenal economies of scale.

Commentators remarking on the fact that Krugman has been a strong critic of the Bush Administration ([1], and particularly [2]) are right, but miss the point. Krugman was awarded the prize for his academic work on trade, geography (and international finance), and not for his political views — just as George Stigler won for his academic work on industrial organization and regulation. And Finn Kydland and Ed Prescott for real business cycle theory and time consistency (none of these would be construed as forwarding left-wing theses). Hence, those who argue Krugman’s popular writings explain his selection simply do not know what they’re talking about. Among academic economists, the question for years was not whether Krugman would get the prize, but when. Now we know the answer. Congratulations to Paul Krugman!

Last 5 posts by Menzie Chinn

• Baselines, Counterfactuals and the Stimulus - November 21st, 2009
• China, the Renminbi, and Global Imbalances: A Quantitative View - November 20th, 2009
• GDP: Revisions and Forecasts - November 19th, 2009
• Assessing the Impact of Government Policy on Widget Consumption and Widget Sector Capital Usage - November 16th, 2009
• The Global Surface Temperature Anomaly - November 16th, 2009