Get Articles Daily from StraightStocks - Enter Email Address


  • National Debt Clock


Fluor (FLR) v Perini (PCR) – a Rising Tide does not Lift all Boats

Source: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FundMyMutualFund/~3/330751227/fluor-flr-v-perini-pcr-rising-tide-does.html
Posted on Wednesday, July 9th, 2008 | In Current Market News, Stocks to Watch
Contributed by: Trader Mark (http://fundmyfund.blogspot.com) -

Fluor (FLR) and Perini (PCR) are in the same sector – infrastructure. That’s about all they have in common. I have owned both at one time or the other, but clearly owning Perini (PCR) was a mistake. My thesis with infrastucture is to focus on the customer base – oil rich Arabs, trade rich Chinese, and essentially bankrupt (federal) US government with unending pocketbook (read: your taxes) who runs deficits to their hearts content. That was my error with Perini – unfortunately their customer base is heavily focused on non federal government Americans (although they are trying to change that) i.e. local governments, US customers who need credit lines – casinos for example [Jan 17: Perini Shows Collateral Damage of Tightening Credit + Slowing Economy]

Construction company Perini Corp (PCR) said Deutsche Bank on Wednesday delivered a notice of loan default to the developer of the Cosmopolitan Resort and Casino project under construction in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Now compare this to the type of projects Fluor is working on – wind energy [May 16: Fluor as a Play on Wind? $1.8 Billion says Yes], solar energy (huge contract with LDK Solar), business with Kuwait, business with the US Department of Energy [Jan 11: Infrastructure Companies Cleaning Up on Contracts] The chart below shows the 1 year relative performance and you can see, based on customer bases alone, the massive difference. The call in this group for long time blog readers has always been – focus on their customer base.

(click to enlarge)
Now with that said, my one concern in this sector is the increasing cost of steel might curtail “some” projects, even for cash flush foreign customers, but all things relative – we still want to focus on those with customers not having to deal with US credit markets, or local governments which actually have to balance a budget unlike our “bottomless pit of spending” federal government. And once again, this shows – even if you get the trend right, picking the right boat to ride the wave is still very important. We closed the last of our Perini last November near $56 (for a smallish loss) as the stock was acting technically weak (breaking support); 8 months later it’s a $25 stock.

Long Fluor, LDK Solar in fund; no personal positions

Last 5 posts by Trader Mark





About Trader Mark (http://fundmyfund.blogspot.com)
Mark is a self taught private investor, fascinated by the market since an early age, discovering mutual funds as a teenager in the 80s, and then moving to equities by the mid 90s. His equity focus is identifying secular growth trends, and the companies most likely to benefit from these macro trends. Stocks are identified through fundamental analysis, although basic technical analysis is used in determining entry and exit points.

With a degree in Economics from the University of Michigan, a broader understanding of the economy as a whole, along with interpreting investor psychology is also a major interest for Mark. His career background has focused on financial analysis in corporate America.

Leave a Reply

Name

Email (kept private)

Website









No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.