ETF Update: A Focus on Health
Source: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/WuQQ/~3/340865676/etf-update-a-focus-on-health.htmlPosted on Sunday, July 20th, 2008 | In Current Market News, Exchange Traded Funds
Growing strength in health care sectors is the dominant theme in this week’s ETF Update. As usual, there are also some interesting implications for the overall market.
We noted the rise of these sectors in last week’s ratings, observing that the market continued to “play defense.” (For new readers tThere is a further explanation of our approach at the end of the article).
Health Care
Moving up into the “buy range” this week is the iShares S&P Global Healthcare Sector Index Fund (IXJ). The top five holdings reflect large-cap pharma, but constitute only 32% of the fund. The P/E ratio is under 20 and the beta only 0.43.
Mike Havrilla points out that most of the health care funds trade at low prices. He writes as follows:
Despite concerns over the health of the domestic economy along with surging food and energy prices, the healthcare sector has failed to garner investor interest as a safe haven. Most healthcare exchange-traded funds [ETFs] and drug stocks continue to languish near multi-year lows, despite an aging Baby Boomer population and ever-increasing proportion of the gross domestic product [GDP] accounted for by healthcare spending.
He also likes the balance in the top ten holdings with a split between the U.S. and Europe.
Gary Gordon suggests that concerns over government-mandated health care may be weighing on these sectors. Our own guess is that some health care stocks will benefit from broader benefit plans, but it is too soon to figure out which ones.
To summarize, these sectors are gaining some interest as money moves away from the energy and basic material sectors. They are defensive and trading at relatively low prices, perhaps because of political concerns.
Weekly TCA-ETF Rankings
We added three positions last week, all in the pharmaceutical and health care sectors. The bottom sectors continue to be financial issues. There is another interesting feature. Several of the recent winners have plummeted in the rankings. These include KOL, MOO, and various energy ETF’s that we recently held. It shows what can happen in the intermediate term when money pours out of a sector.
It is still a very defensive picture. The model shift to inverse ETF’s was a drag on our position this week, but the addition of the health care holdings helped. Most sectors are still in the “penalty box.” Using the model as our guide, we have continued our multi-week bearish posture in the Ticker Sense blogger sentiment poll.
Last 5 posts by Jeffrey Miller
- A Tough Nut to Crack - October 29th, 2009
- ETF Update: Looking to the Internet - October 25th, 2009
- Healthcare Reform Becoming Less Likely - October 21st, 2009
- ETF Update: Another Look at the Banks - October 18th, 2009
- Identifying Quackery (and Other Mistakes) - October 6th, 2009
![]() About Jeffrey Miller (http://www.oldprof.typepad.com)
Jeffrey A. Miller, Ph.D. is a former college professor with a hands-on, real world attitude. His quantitative modeling helped inform state and local officials in Wisconsin for more than a decade. A Public Policy analyst, he taught advanced research methods at the University of Wisconsin, and analyzed many issues related to state tax policy. In 1987 Jeff began work for market makers at the Chicago Board Options Exchange. His approach included finding anomalies in the standard option pricing models and developing new forecasting techniques. Merging these quantitative techniques with specific company analysis, Jeff also generated trading ideas from sell-side analyst reports. Through his years of experience in trading options, futures and equities, Jeff has come to be regarded as an expert in interpreting the effect of news on the markets and individual stocks. Jeff has served as a forensic expert in several cases involving such issues. He has also written a series of papers on investment management, describing both quantitative methods and those related to behavioral economics. |



