Get Articles Daily from StraightStocks - Enter Email Address


  • National Debt Clock


Jeremy Siegel: S&P’s Earnings Wrong

Source: http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/February/jeremy-siegel-sp-earnings-wrong.html
Posted on Thursday, February 26th, 2009 | In Contrarian Perspectives
Contributed by: Investment U (http://www.investmentu.com) -

Jeremy Siegel: S&P’s Earnings Wrong

Investment U Research Team

Jeremy Siegel, professor of finance at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and market guru, published an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal on how the S&P 500 had misstated its earnings.

A simple example can illustrate S&P’s error. Suppose on a given day the only price changes in the S&P 500 are that the largest stock, Exxon-Mobil, rose 10% in price and the smallest stock, Jones Apparel Group, fell 10%. Would S&P report that the S&P 500 was unchanged that day? Of course not. Exxon-Mobil has a market weight of over 5% in the S&P 500, while the weight of Jones Apparel is less than .04%, so that the return on Exxon-Mobil is weighted 1,381 times the return on Jones Apparel. In fact, a 10% rise in Exxon-Mobil’s price would boost the S&P 500 by 4.64 index points, while the same fall in Jones Apparel would have no impact since the change is far less than the one-hundredth of one point to which the index is routinely rounded.

Yet when S&P calculates earnings, these market weights are ignored. If, for example, Exxon-Mobil earned $10 billion while Jones Apparel lost $10 billion, S&P would simply add these earnings together to compute the aggregate earnings of its index, ignoring the vast discrepancy in the relative weights on these firms. Although the average investor holds 1,381 times as much stock in Exxon-Mobil as in Jones Apparel, S&P would say that that portfolio has no earnings and hence an “infinite” P/E ratio. These incorrect calculations are producing an extraordinarily low reported level of earnings, high P/E ratios, and the reported fourth-quarter “loss.”

While the current P/E ratio of the S&P 500 is listed at 12.5, it should be closer to 9.4. He gives good reasons why investors shouldn’t fool themselves into thinking the market is still overvalued. And when a guru like Siegel believes that the market is undervalued, we should all take notice.

To read his full commentary, go to the full Wall Street Journal article.

Last 5 posts by Investment U





About Investment U (http://www.investmentu.com)
Everything You Want To Know About Investing, But Don’t Trust Anyone Enough To Ask

It’s a shame, really, that much of what is offered here - at no charge - is not taught in the public schools. Why is it that you can graduate in the top of your high school class and know next to nothing about credit card debt, adjustable-rate mortgages, or 401(k)s?

Founded in 1999, the goal of Investment U is to give you impartial, no-nonsense advice on how to build long-lasting wealth.

Our mission is to analyze and discuss all the important financial tools at your disposal. And to make sure, too, that you use them effectively to jump-start your net worth, cut your investment costs dramatically, reduce your risk profile and, most importantly, achieve and maintain total financial independence.

It’s the latter point that is truly our goal here at Investment U. Because no one has the opportunity to live his life fully if he’s a slave to his job, his financial obligations, or his overhead. Or, worse, if he’s worried he won’t be able to maintain a comfortable retirement… or leave behind some kind of legacy.

Leave a Reply

Name

Email (kept private)

Website









No recommendations, either expressed or implied, are being made to buy, sell, hold or short any of the mentioned stocks. No legal, tax or accounting advice is expressed or implied. Always contact your attorney, CPA, or tax advisor before acting on any legal or tax issues. StraightStocks.com is not responsible for the content, products, or services of any of the advertisers on this site. StraightStocks.com receives compensation from advertisers on this blog. Services and products referred to herein are trademarks, registered trademarks, servicemarks, and/or registered servicemarks of their respective trademark or servicemark owners.